Access to health care. Part 2: Working-age adults

OBJECTIVES: This report presents data on access to health care for U.S. working-age adults, 18-64 years old. Access indicators are examined by selected sociodemographic characteristics including sex, age, race and/or ethnicity, place of residence, employment status, income, health status, and health insurance status. METHODS: Data are from the 1993 Access to Care and 1993 Health Insurance Surveys of the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a continuing household survey of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of the United States. The sample contained 61,287 persons in 24,071 households. RESULTS: In 1993, approximately 3 out of 4 working-age adults had a regular source of medical care. Nine out of 10 adults with health insurance had a regular source of care compared with 6 out of 10 adults without health insurance. For adults with a regular source of care, 86 percent received care in a private doctor's office, 9 percent in a clinic, and 2 percent in a hospital emergency room. The two main reasons given for not having a regular source of care were "do not need a doctor" (49 percent), and "no insurance can't afford it" (22 percent). Persons in the highest income group were more likely to report no need for a doctor (59 percent) than persons in the lowest income group (35 percent). About 40 percent of uninsured persons and 16 percent of insured persons reported an unmet medical need. CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance plays a key role in the access to medical care services. Persons who are uninsured or have low incomes are at the greatest risk of having unmet medical needs.     

Ensuring health care quality: a purchaser's perspective--a health care coalition

This paper explores how one health care purchasing coalition in Minnesota, the Buyers Health Care Action Group (BHCAG), has taken an active role in restructuring its local health care market. BHCAG started with the belief that the consumer should be the motivating force in health care delivery. Unfortunately, providing consumers with the information and incentives they need to make informed, effective health care decisions has triggered numerous problems. This paper examines groups of providers who network to form care systems, and explores the roles of consumers, employers, and health plans in the current market. It identifies specific methods for gathering data and distributing information to the consumer, and discusses the problems associated with attempting to implement quality improvement, as well as the questions that arise when the market does not support those improvements.     

Measuring psychosocial work quality and health: Development of health care measures of measurement.

Demands on workload and work efficiency have increased because of ongoing global changes in health care organizations. Assessing and evaluating effects of changes on organizational and individual well-being require valid and reliable methods. Questionnaires from 3 large health care studies were used to develop instruments for work quality and health. Study 1 included 2,935 participants from all occupational groups. Study 2 sampled 3,545 nurses and midwives. Participants in Study 3 consisted of 3,506 employees at a large hospital. Variable fields of work quality, health and well-being, and modifying factors were factor analyzed with replicated structures in new samples, including 6 factors of work quality, 5 health factors, and 2 modifying factors. All except 2 factors had high internal consistency (Cronbach's α?=?.69–84) and low factor intercorrelations within areas. Social climate (but not individual resources) had, according to our model, a modifying effect on the work-health interaction (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Restraint-free care. Part 1: Legal and regulatory mandates. Part 2: Creating a restraint-free environment

In response to the revised 1996 Joint Commission of Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's restraint standards, many facilities are assessing and revising their current practice. Part 1 discusses the regulatory, legal and ethical dimensions of patient restraints. Part 2 describes one hospital's approach to promoting a restraint-free environment. As a result of this hospital's assessment, restraint use decreased 25% in intubated patients; 50% in nonintubated patients.     

The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality

OBJECTIVE: To identify issues related to the quality of health care in the United States, including its measurement, assessment, and improvement, requiring action by health care professionals or other constituencies in the public or private sectors. PARTICIPANTS: The National Roundtable on Health Care Quality, convened by the Institute of Medicine, a component of the National Academy of Sciences, comprised 20 representatives of the private and public sectors, practicing medicine and nursing, representing academia, business, consumer advocacy, and the health media, and including the heads of federal health programs. The roundtable met 6 times between February 1996 and January 1998. It explored ongoing, rapid changes in health care and the implications of these changes for the quality of health and health care in the United States. EVIDENCE: Roundtable members held discussions with a wide variety of experts, convened conferences, commissioned papers, and drew on their individual professional experience. CONSENSUS PROCESS: At the end of its deliberations, roundtable members reached consensus on the conclusions described in this article by a series of discussions at committee meetings and reviews of successive draft documents, the first of which was created by the listed authors and the Institute of Medicine project director. The drafts were revised following these discussions, and the final document was approved according to the formal report review procedures of the National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of health care can be precisely defined and measured with a degree of scientific accuracy comparable with that of most measures used in clinical medicine. Serious and widespread quality problems exist throughout American medicine. These problems, which may be classified as underuse, overuse, or misuse, occur in small and large communities alike, in all parts of the country, and with approximately equal frequency in managed care and fee-for-service systems of care. Very large numbers of Americans are harmed as a direct result. Quality of care is the problem, not managed care. Current efforts to improve will not succeed unless we undertake a major, systematic effort to overhaul how we deliver health care services, educate and train clinicians, and assess and improve quality.     

Health care systems in transition: People's Republic of China. Part I: An overview of China's health care system

The People's Republic of China for the first 30 years of its existence had a centrally directed health care system which achieved impressive health gains for its population. By emphasizing prevention; organizing innovative, low-cost, locally controlled health services; and promoting accessible primary health care in rural areas, China increased life expectancy for most of its people, dramatically reduced levels of infant mortality, and eradicated or controlled a range of infectious and parasitic diseases. Since 1978, however, China's leadership has come to depend more upon market forces than central direction and planning to achieve economic growth. These new orientation has had major effects upon the organization and financing of health services. After more than a decade of economic and agricultural reform, China still has problems providing good-quality, affordable, and equitable health services for the majority of the rural population and both urban and rural poor. The need to pay for health care considerably exacerbates poverty in China. This paper describes the structure of government and the health care system, the nature of change during 1978-90, the impact of the reforms upon health status and health care delivery, and future challenges.     

Towards quality and cost-effective health care

Although rich cumulative evidence exists on nursing's effectiveness, few policymakers and healthcare executives apparently are familiar with it. To make such scientific-based knowledge more available so that it can be considered and integrated in healthcare policy and reform, the WHO Collaborating Centre at Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada, complied and reviewed research evidence about how nursing services contribute towards cost effectiveness and quality health outcomes. Below, a summary of its findings.     

Quality management for psychology services in health care facilities.

Describes a model of quality management, designed by a task force of the Canadian Psychological Association, to meet revised standards of the Canadian Council on Health Facilities Accreditation for psychology services. The incorporation of aspects of Continuous Quality Improvement, Total Quality Management, Indicators, and Benchmarking are discussed in relation to their application to psychology services in health care facilities. The Quality Management Model is based on the assumptions that everyone wants to do their job well and improve in their job performance; that the improvement in the quality of services is everyone's responsibility; and that psychological service provision in a health care facility involves complex linkages between providers, suppliers, and customers. The model also assumes that the major problems affecting quality of service are usually those same linkages, or the customers themselves; and that identifying and monitoring these linkages is crucial to understanding how to improve quality. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)