Discriminative stimulus effects of a cocaine/heroin "speedball" combination in rhesus monkeys

Cocaine and heroin often are abused together in a combination known as a "speedball," but relatively little is known about ways in which cocaine and heroin may interact to modify each other's abuse-related effects. The present study evaluated the discriminative stimulus effects of a speedball combination of cocaine and heroin. Three rhesus monkeys were trained to discriminate vehicle from a 10:1 ratio of cocaine (0.4 mg/kg) in combination with heroin (0.04 mg/kg). Both cocaine alone and heroin alone substituted completely for the cocaine/heroin combination, although cocaine and heroin were more potent when administered together than when administered alone. Combined pretreatment with the dopamine antagonist flupenthixol and the opioid antagonist quadazocine dose-dependently antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of the cocaine/heroin combination, but pretreatment with either antagonist alone was less effective. These findings suggest that either cocaine or heroin alone was sufficient to substitute for the cocaine/heroin training combination. To characterize the discriminative stimulus properties of this speedball more fully, a series of cocaine-like and heroin-like agonists were studied in substitution tests. The indirect dopamine agonists CFT, amphetamine and bupropion and the mu opioid agonists alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine produced high levels of speedball-appropriate responding. However, the indirect dopamine agonist GBR12909, the D1 dopamine agonist SKF82958, the D2 dopamine agonist quinpirole and the partial mu opioid agonist nalbuphine did not substitute for the cocaine/heroin combination. Because these compounds produce discriminative stimulus effects similar to either cocaine or mu opioid agonists alone, these findings suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of the cocaine/heroin combination do not overlap completely with the effects of cocaine and heroin alone. Finally, a series of compounds that produce partial or no substitution for cocaine or mu agonists alone also did not substitute for the cocaine/heroin combination, which indicates that the discriminative stimulus effects of the combination were pharmacologically selective. Taken together, these findings suggest that a combination of cocaine and heroin produces a pharmacologically selective discriminative stimulus complex that includes aspects of both component drugs.     

Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine antagonist PNU-99194A in rats: comparison with psychomotor stimulants

The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine receptor antagonist PNU-99194A [5,6-di-methoxy-2-(dipropylamino)indan-hydrochloride] in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Eight rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline in a two-choice, water-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. In tests of stimulus generalization, PNU-99194A (1.25-40.0 mg/kg, s.c. and i.p.) did not substitute for cocaine. PNU-99194A (5.0-20 mg/kg) also did not significantly block the discrimination of cocaine (10 mg/kg), nor did it potentiate a low dose (1.25 mg/kg) of cocaine. A separate group of eight rats were trained to discriminate PNU-99194A from saline. These subjects met the discrimination criterion within an average of 68 (S.E.M. = 6.5) training sessions; the ED50 for PNU-99194A was 2.6 mg/kg. In stimulus generalization tests, cocaine (1.25-10 mg/kg) did not substitute for PNU-99194A, when administered by either i.p. or by s.c. injection. In addition, neither amphetamine (0.25-1.0 mg/kg) nor caffeine (8.0-64 mg/kg) produced stimulus generalization in these rats. These results indicate that D3 receptors do not play a critical role in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Furthermore, although PNU-99194A is capable of establishing and maintaining discriminative stimulus control in rats, the effects of this D3-preferring antagonist are dissimilar from those of psychomotor stimulants. Given the unique behavioral profile of D3 receptor antagonists, the potential utility of these agents as adjunctive treatments for psychostimulant abuse is discussed.     

Avoiding labor problems during vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

Dopamine has been proposed to mediate some of the behavioral effects of caffeine. This review discusses cellular mechanisms of action that could explain the role of dopamine in the behavioral effects of caffeine and summarizes the results of behavioral studies in both animals and humans that provide evidence for a role of dopamine in these effects. Caffeine is a competitive antagonist at adenosine receptors and produces a range of central and physiological effects that are opposite those of adenosine. Recently, caffeine has been shown to enhance dopaminergic activity, presumably by competitive antagonism at adenosine receptors that are colocalized and interact functionally with dopamine receptors. Thus, caffeine, as a competitive antagonist at adenosine receptors, may produce its behavioral effects by removing the negative modulatory effects of adenosine from dopamine receptors, thus stimulating dopaminergic activity. Consistent with this interpretation, preclinical behavioral studies show that caffeine produces behavioral effects similar to classic dopaminergically mediated stimulants such as cocaine and amphetamine, including increased locomotor activity, increased turning behavior in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned animals, stimulant-like discriminative stimulus effects, and self-administration. Furthermore, caffeine potentiates the effects of dopamine-mediated drugs on these same behaviors, and some of caffeine's effects on these behaviors can be blocked by dopamine receptor antagonists. Although more limited in scope, human studies also show that caffeine produces subjective, discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects that have some similarities to those produced by cocaine and amphetamine.     

Evaluation of the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in combination with (+)-AJ76 or clozapine

Because self-administration and discrimination of a drug by animals correlate with its abuse and subjective effects in humans, interventions that modify the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of the drug may be useful in the treatment of its abuse. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of the putative dopamine autoreceptor antagonist (+)-AJ76 (AJ) or the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (CLZ) on the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in monkeys. One group of rhesus monkeys (n = 6) was allowed to self-administer cocaine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg/injection i.v. fixed-ratio 10, 2 hr/day). A second group of monkeys (n = 5) was trained to discriminate cocaine (0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg i.m., 10 min presession) from saline in a two lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination paradigm. When behavior was stable, AJ or CLZ was administered i.m., 15 or 30 min presession. Intermediate doses of both compounds (1.0-3.0 mg/kg of AJ; 0.3-1.0 mg/kg of CLZ) increased cocaine self-administration, while responding remained evenly distributed over the session. A higher dose of CLZ decreased cocaine self-administration in an apparently nonspecific manner. When combined with saline, partial substitution for cocaine was seen in one of three monkeys with AJ and in none with CLZ. In combination with the training dose of cocaine in the discrimination experiment, both AJ and CLZ decreased drug appropriate responding by at least 50% in two of four monkeys, but had little or no effect in the other monkeys up to doses that completely suppressed lever pressing (6.4 mg/kg of AJ; 3.2 mg/kg of CLZ). Taken together, the present findings suggest that any blockade of the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine by AJ and CLZ was, at best, partial. Furthermore, the stimulant effects of AJ observed in rats were not prominent in monkeys.     

Effects of kappa opioid agonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

The study examined the effects of the kappa opioid agonists U50,488 and ethylketocyclazocine (EKC) on cocaine discrimination in rhesus monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine (0.4 mg/kg) from saline. Administration of U50,488 and EKC alone produced primarily saline-appropriate responding. Kappa agonist pretreatments produced variable effects on cocaine discrimination across monkeys, attenuating the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in some monkeys, but either having no effect on cocaine discrimination or enhancing the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in other monkeys. The effects of kappa agonists on cocaine discrimination were reversed by pretreatment with the opioid antagonist naloxone (1.0 mg/kg). These results indicate that kappa agonists do not consistently block the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Nicotine-like discriminative stimulus effects of bupropion in rats.

Bupropion, a tobacco-cessation product, shares discriminative stimulus effects with cocaine and methamphetamine. The discriminative stimulus effects of these drugs, in turn, overlap with those of nicotine. This study investigated the overlap in discriminative stimulus effects of bupropion and nicotine. Rats were trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg (-)-nicotine from saline in 2-lever drug discrimination. Both nicotine and bupropion substituted for nicotine: however nicotine's effects were blocked by the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine, whereas those of bupropion were not. These results suggest that bupropion may be producing its nicotine-like discriminative stimulus effect though a different mechanism that nicotine. Give bupropion's shared pharmacology with dopamine transport inhibitors, these effects may be produced in part through bupropion's actions on dopaminergic neurotransmission. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Demonstration of complimentarity between monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and polyclonal antibodies to luteinizing hormone/hCG receptor (LH-R) and their use in better understanding hormone-receptor interaction

The concurrent influence of multiple neurotransmitter systems in mediating cocaine-induced convulsions is predicted by the results of previous receptor binding studies. The present results demonstrate that pharmacological manipulations of these predicted neurotransmitter systems alters the occurrence of cocaine-induced convulsions. The 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine enhanced the occurrence and severity of convulsions produced by 100 mg/kg (-) cocaine, while the 5-HT2 receptor antagonists cinanserin, ketanserin and pirenperone antagonized cocaine-induced convulsions in a dose-dependent manner. Further, the M1 receptor antagonist pirenzepine antagonized cocaine-induced convulsions, but atropine did not. In addition, both the (+) and (-) stereoisomers of the sigma ligand SKF 10047 significantly attenuated cocaine-induced convulsions. (+)SKF 10047 was more potent than (-)SKF 10047 in this effect, suggesting a stereoselective effect at sigma receptor sites. In constrast, DA and NE neurotransmission do not appear to modulate the proconvulsant effects of cocaine in a specific, dose-dependent manner. Thus, of the CNS binding sites with which cocaine is known to interact, the results are consistent with the conclusion that 5-HT transporters and 5-HT2 receptor sites appear to be direct and primary sites related to cocaine-induced convulsions, while M1 and sigma binding sites appear to play important but secondary and modulatory roles in this response.     

Methcathione ("cat"): an enantiomeric potency comparison

With regard to its chemical structure, methcathinone is to cathinone what methamphetamine is to amphetamine. Although it is a drug of abuse outside the United States, methcathione is only recently making an appearance on the clandestine market in this country and has just been classified a Schedule I substance under the Emergency Scheduling Act. We have previously demonstrated that racemic methcathinone produces locomotor stimulation in mice, and substitutes for cocaine and (+)amphetamine in rats trained to discriminate either cocaine or (+)amphetamine, respectively, from saline in tests of stimulus generalization. Because an enantiomeric potency comparison has never been reported for the optical isomers of methcathinone, in the present investigation we synthesized samples of S(-)- and R(+)methcathinone and compared them for their ability: a) to produce locomotor stimulation in mice, b) to elicit cocaine-like responding in rats trained to discriminate 8.0 mg/kg of cocaine from saline vehicle, and c) to elicit (+)-amphetamine-appropriate responding in rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of (+)amphetamine from saline vehicle. S(-)Methcathinone was about twice as potent as S(+)amphetamine and three to five times more potent than R(+)methcathinone in the three pharmacologic assays. We conclude that both optical isomers possess central stimulant character, but that S(-)methcathinone is somewhat more potent than R(+)methcathinone.     

Behavioral effects of the delta-selective opioid agonist SNC80 and related compounds in rhesus monkeys

The behavioral effects of the nonpeptidic delta opioid agonist SNC80 and a series of related piperazinyl benzamides derived from the parent compound BW373U86 were evaluated in rhesus monkeys. SNC80 (0.1-10 mg/kg) decreased response rates maintained by food-reinforcement in a dose- and time-dependent manner, with maximal effects occurring within 10 min of intramuscular injection. The potency of SNC80 and five other piperazinyl benzamides in this assay of schedule-controlled responding correlated with their affinity at cloned human delta opioid receptors but not with their affinity for cloned human mu receptors. Moreover, the effects of SNC80 were selectively antagonized by the delta-selective antagonist naltrindole (1.0 mg/kg), but not by the mu selective antagonist quadazocine (0.1 mg/kg) or the kappa-selective antagonist norbinaltorphimine (3.2 mg/kg). These findings indicate that SNC80 functions as a systemically active, delta-selective agonist with a rapid onset of action in rhesus monkeys. The antinociceptive effects of SNC80 were examined in a warm-water tail-withdrawal assay of thermal nociception. SNC80 (0.1-10 mg/kg) produced weak but replicable antinociceptive effects that were antagonized by naltrindole (1.0 mg/kg). SNC80 antinociception was also dose-dependently antagonized by BW373U86 (0.56-1.0 mg/kg), which was inactive in this procedure. These findings suggest that SNC80 may have higher efficacy than BW373U86 at delta opioid receptors. Moreover, SNC80 at doses up to 32 mg/kg did not produce convulsions, which suggests that SNC80 may also be safer than BW373U86. The effects of SNC80 were also examined in monkeys trained to discriminate cocaine (0.4 mg/kg i.m.) or self-administer cocaine (0.032 mg/kg/injection,i.v.). In drug discrimination studies, SNC80 (0.1-10 mg/kg) produced a dose-dependent and naltrindole-reversible increase in cocaine-appropriate responding, and complete substitution for cocaine was observed in five of seven monkeys tested. However, SNC80 (1.0-100 micrograms/kg/injection) did not maintain responding in monkeys trained to self-administer cocaine. Thus, despite its ability to produce cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, SNC80 may have relatively low abuse potential.     

m-Chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) Modulates the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Cocaine Through Actions at the 5-HT?C Receptor.

Agonists acting at the serotonin-1B receptor (5-HT?BR) and 5-HT?CR have been reported to potentiate and block, respectively, the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. The present investigation reassessed the antagonistic effects of the mixed 5-HT?C/?BR agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in the presence or absence of selective antagonism of the 5-HT?BR or 5-HT?CR. The stimulus effects of cocaine were attenuated by mCPP at doses that reduced response rates. The selective 5-HT?CR antagonist SB 242084, but not the selective 5-HT?BR antagonist GR 127935, reversed the mCPP-evoked attenuation of the cocaine cue and the suppression of response rates. These results demonstrate that the suppressive effects of mCPP on cocaine discrimination are related to stimulation of the HT?CR. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Generalization of D-, L- and DL-chlorpheniramine and zolantidine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine

We recently demonstrated that some H-antagonists have cocaine or methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, the effects of optical isomers of chlorpheniramine (D-, L- and DL-forms) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and saline, to determine whether these effects of H1-antagonists are mediated by the blockade of H-receptors. In generalization tests with optical isomers of chlorpheniramine, the D-, L- and DL-forms all completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but did not generalize to those of methamphetamine. Dose-generalization by the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine did not correlate with the H-antagonistic potency of these drugs. These results suggest that all of the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine have cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, but that these effects are not mediated by H1-receptor blockade. On the other hand, the H2-antagonist, zolantidine, generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, but not to those of cocaine, suggesting that zolantidine may have methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, GBR12909 (dopamine uptake inhibitor) completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but not to those of methamphetamine, whereas apomorphine (dopamine receptor agonist) generalized more potently to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine than to those of cocaine. These findings imply that although the dopaminergic system plays an important role in the discriminative stimulus effects of both cocaine and methamphetamine, there may be differences between their effects.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of (±)-fenfluramine: The role of 5-HT? receptor subtypes.

The role of serotonin 5-HT? receptors (5-HT?R) in the discriminative stimulus effects of fenfluramine was investigated. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate (±)-fenfluramine (2 mg/kg ip) from saline using a 2-lever, water-reinforced paradigm. Drug-lever responding after fenfluramine was dose-dependent. The 5-HT2C/1BR agonist mCPP and the 5-HT2CR agonist MK 212 fully substituted, whereas the 5-HT2A/2CR agonist DOI partially substituted, for the training drug. The 5-HT2BR agonist BW 723C86 engendered saline-lever responding. The 5-HT2C/2BR antagonist SB 206553 completely antagonized the fenfluramine discrimination as well as the full substitutions of mCPP and MK 212 and the partial substitution of DOI. The selective 5-HT2AR antagonist M100907 partially suppressed the stimulus effects of fenfluramine, mCPP, and MK 212 and almost fully attenuated the partial substitution of DOI. RS 102221, a selective 5-HT2CR antagonist that does not cross the blood-brain barrier, did not alter the fenfluramine cue. Results demonstrate that the discriminative stimulus effects of fenfluramine are centrally mediated by 5-HT2CR and to some extent by 5-HT2AR. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discriminative stimulus effects on enadoline in pigeons

The discriminative stimulus effects of enadoline were characterized in pigeons responding under a fixed-ratio 20 schedule of food presentation and discriminating between intramuscular injections of the kappa opioid agonist enadoline and saline. Cumulative doses of enadoline dose-dependently increased drug-key responding with the training dose of enadoline (0.178 mg/kg) producing > or = 90% drug key responding (% DR). In time course studies, doses of enadoline larger than 0.32 mg/kg produced > or = 90% DR for more than 40 min. Naltrexone antagonized both the discriminative stimulus and the rate-decreasing effects of enadoline (pA2 = 6.79 and 6.73, respectively); in some pigeons, naltrexone produced an unsurmountable antagonism of the enadoline discriminative stimulus. Substitution tests using the kappa agonists U-50,488, spiradoline, U-69,593 and ethylketocyclazocine resulted in > or = 90% DR in most, but not all, pigeons; at larger doses, all compounds markedly decreased response rates. Up to rate-decreasing doses, nalorphine, dynorphin A(1-13) amide (DYN), nalbuphine, butorphanol, morphine and ketamine failed to occasion > or = 90% DR; nalbuphine, nalorphine, butorphanol, but not DYN, antagonized the discriminative stimulus and the rate-decreasing effects of enadoline. This study established stimulus control with enadoline in pigeons and results from substitution studies in these pigeons support the view that the enadoline discriminative stimulus is mediated by kappa opioid receptors; these results further demonstrate that nalbuphine and butorphanol have kappa antagonist actions in pigeons. The negative results obtained with DYN are in contrast to previous demonstrations of kappa agonist effects for DYN and might provide support for the hypothesized importance of nonopioid systems in the effects of this peptide.     

Interactions between N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists and the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine in rats

NMDA receptor antagonists have previously been reported to alter some pharmacological and behavioral effects of acute and chronic opioid administration. The present study assessed the interactions of NMDA antagonists with the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Adult male Long Evans rats were trained to discriminate 3.2 mg/kg of s.c. morphine from water under a two-lever fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions. I.p. injections of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist dizocilpine (0.03-0.2 mg/kg), the competitive antagonists NPC 17742 (1-16 mg/kg), and SDZ 220-581 (0.1-3 mg/kg), the polyamine site antagonist eliprodil (3-17.3 mg/kg), the glycine-site partial agonist (+)-HA-966 (3-56 mg/kg), and the nonselective glutamate antagonist kynurenic acid (30-150 mg/kg) were coadministered with s.c. morphine (1-3.2 mg/kg; interaction tests) or water (generalization tests). In generalization tests, none of the compounds completely substituted for morphine. Concurrent administration of morphine and NMDA antagonists did not greatly alter the discriminative stimulus properties of morphine. Various doses of NPC 17742, SDZ 220-581, or (+)-HA-966 somewhat increased levels of morphine-appropriate lever selection, whereas some attenuation of morphine-lever selection was obtained when morphine was coadministered with eliprodil. These results show that NMDA antagonists have minimal interactions with the discriminative stimulus effects of morphine.     

Tramadol induces antidepressant-type effects in mice

Tramadol is a clinically-effective, centrally-acting analgesic. This drug is a racemic mixture of two enantiomers, each one displaying different mechanisms: (+)tramadol displays opioid agonist properties and inhibits serotonin reuptake while (-)tramadol inhibit preferentially noradrenaline reuptake. The action of tramadol on the monoaminergic reuptake is similar to that of antidepressant drugs. Therefore, we have examined the effects of (+/-)tramadol, (+)tramadol and (-)tramadol in a test predictive of antidepressant activity, the forced swimming test in mice. Both (+/-)tramadol and its (-) enantiomer displayed a dose-dependent reduction on immobility; while the effect induced by the (+) enantiomer was not significant. Inhibition of noradrenaline synthesis, but not of serotonin synthesis, was capable of blocking the effect of (+/-)tramadol. The alpha-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine, as well as the alpha2-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine, and the beta-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol countered the immobility-reducing action of (+/-)tramadol. Moreover, neither the serotoninergic blocker methysergide nor the opioid antagonist naloxone antagonized the effect of (+/-)tramadol. Our results show that (+/-)tramadol and (-)tramadol have antidepressant-like effect in mice, probably mediated by the noradrenergic system rather than the serotoninergic or opioidergic ones.     

Discriminative Stimulus Effects of the Cannabinoid Antagonist, SR 141716A, in Δ?-Tetrahydrocannabinol-Treated Rhesus Monkeys.

This study examined whether the cannabinoid antagonist, SR 141716A, could be established as a discriminative stimulus in rhesus monkeys treated with Δ?-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ?-THC). Stimulus control was established with SR 141716A (1.0 mg/kg) in 3 Δ?-THC-treated monkeys (1.12 mg/kg/day) in 113-124 sessions. The SR 141716A discriminative stimulus was dose related, attenuated by an acute injection of Δ?-THC, and not mimicked by cocaine or ketamine. SR 141716A-appropriate responding occasioned by temporary discontinuation of Δ?-THC treatment was attenuated by Δ?-THC and not ketamine. The SR 141716A discriminative stimulus in Δ?-THC-treated monkeys appears to be mediated by cannabinoid receptors and could be related to Δ?-THC withdrawal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Antagonism of cocaine's reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects by !a-flupenthixol.

Examined the effects of the D?/D? dopamine receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol in animal models designed to assess abuse-related behavioral effects of cocaine. Rhesus monkeys self-administered cocaine (17 or 33 μg/kg/injection, iv) during 1-hr daily sessions; periods of food-maintained behavior preceded and followed cocaine access. α-Flupenthixol (0.003–0.03 mg/kg, iv) increased self-administration rates, indicating an antagonism of cocaine's reinforcing effects but decreased rates of food-maintained responding. α-Flupenthixol (0.03 mg/kg) blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (0.3 mg/kg) in squirrel monkeys but did not do so in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline. On the basis of available animal data and preliminary clinical trials, α-flupenthixol may warrant further study as a cocaine abuse pharmacotherapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Behavioral evaluation of modafinil and the abuse-related effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Modafinil is a central nervous system stimulant used to promote wakefulness, and it is being evaluated clinically as an agonist medication for treating stimulant abuse. This is the first report of the effects of modafinil on the abuse-related effects of cocaine in nonhuman primates. The behavioral effects of modafinil were examined in three studies. First, the discriminative stimulus effects of modafinil (3.2–32 mg/kg) were evaluated in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) trained to discriminate either low (0.18 mg/kg, IM) or high (0.4 mg/kg, IM) doses of cocaine from saline. Modafinil dose-dependently substituted for cocaine in 6 of 7 monkeys. In the second study, the effects of chronically administered modafinil (32–56 mg/kg/day, IV) on food- and cocaine-maintained (0.001–0.1 mg/kg/inj) operant responding were examined. Modafinil was administered 3 times/hr for 23 hr/day to ensure stable drug levels. Chronic treatment with 32 mg/kg/day modafinil selectively reduced responding maintained by intermediate and peak reinforcing doses of cocaine, but responding maintained by higher doses of cocaine was unaffected. Food-maintained behavior did not change during chronic modafinil treatment. In a third study, modafinil (32 and 56 mg/kg/day, IV) was examined in a reinstatement model. Modafinil transiently increased responding during extinction. These findings indicate that modafinil shares discriminative stimulus effects with cocaine and selectively reduces responding maintained by reinforcing doses of cocaine. In addition, modafinil reinstated cocaine-seeking behavior, which may reflect its cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects. These data support clinical findings and indicate that these preclinical models may be useful for predicting the effectiveness of agonist medications for drug abuse treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Discriminative stimulus effects of opioids in pigeons trained to discriminate fentanyl, bremazocine and water: evidence of pharmacological selectivity

The purpose of the present investigation was to examine the discriminative stimulus effects of opioids with activity at mu and kappa opioid receptors, in pigeons trained to discriminate the mu opioid fentanyl, the kappa opioid bremazocine and water in a three-choice discrimination task. The apparent pkB values obtained for naloxone as an antagonist of the stimulus effects of fentanyl were higher than those obtained against the bremazocine stimulus. The mu opioids morphine and l-methadone substituted for the fentanyl stimulus, the kappa opioids U50,488 and U69,593 substituted for the bremazocine stimulus, and the non-opioid pentobarbital failed to substitute for either the fentanyl or bremazocine stimulus. A series of opioids with activity at both the mu and kappa opioid receptor sites, including nalorphine, butorphanol, buprenorphine, nalbuphine, ethylketocyclazocine, (-)-ketocyclazocine, (-)-n-allylnormetazocine (NANM) and levallorphan, produced high levels of substitution for the fentanyl stimulus without producing appreciable levels of substitution for the bremazocine stimulus. At doses that did not substitute for the fentanyl stimulus, (-)-NANM, levallorphan, nalorphine and nalbuphine partially antagonized the bremazocine stimulus (i.e. produced responding on the water key). Butorphanol and buprenorphine also antagonized the bremazocine stimulus, although this effect was evidenced only at doses that substituted for the fentanyl stimulus. In contrast, even when tested up to doses that markedly decreased rates of responding, ethylketocyclazocine and (-)-ketocyclazocine failed to antagonize the bremazocine stimulus. The present findings indicate that in this three-choice task the fentanyl-like substitution patterns produced by opioids with activity at both the mu and kappa opioid receptors are similar to those reported in pigeons trained to discriminate either fentanyl or bremazocine from saline (i.e. two-choice tasks). In this task, however, the level of kappa antagonist activity evidenced by these opioids was considerably less than that obtained in pigeons trained to discriminate bremazocine from saline.     

Aripiprazole as a potential pharmacotherapy for stimulant dependence: Human laboratory studies with d-amphetamine.

Amphetamine and cocaine dependence present significant public health concerns, yet no broadly effective pharmacotherapy for stimulant dependence has been developed. Two human laboratory studies are reviewed that tested the ability of aripiprazole, a novel antipsychotic with partial agonist activity at D2 dopamine receptors, to alter the behavioral effects of stimulants using d-amphetamine as a model agent. In each of these experiments, volunteers learned to discriminate 15 mg d-amphetamine (i.e., ≥80% drug-appropriate responding over 4 consecutive sessions). The effects of a range of doses of d-amphetamine (0, 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 mg) were then tested alone and following pretreatment with aripiprazole (20 mg in Experiment 1; 10 mg in Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, aripiprazole (20 mg) attenuated the discriminative stimulus and many of the subject-rated effects of amphetamine. Aripiprazole alone produced performance decrements. To determine whether a lower dose of aripiprazole would also attenuate the behavioral effects of d-amphetamine without impairing performance, Experiment 2 was conducted. Aripiprazole (10 mg) failed to alter the discriminative-stimulus effects but attenuated some of the subject-rated effects of d-amphetamine. This dose of aripiprazole did not impair performance. The results of these experiments indicate that aripiprazole may have clinical utility in treating stimulant dependence. Future human laboratory research should better model the clinical use of aripiprazole by examining the effects of chronic aripiprazole combined with either methamphetamine or cocaine in dependent individuals. A large-scale clinical trial is also needed to evaluate the efficacy of aripiprazole for the treatment of stimulant dependence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)