2-Hydroxyisonicotinate dehydrogenase isolated from Mycobacterium sp. INA1

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with poor mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) or delayed platelet engraftment after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with lymphoma. Fifty-eight patients with Hodgkin's disease or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma underwent PBPC transplantation as the "best available therapy" at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) between 1993 and 1995. PBPCs were mobilized with either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone (n = 19) or G-CSF following combination chemotherapy (n = 39). Forty-eight of these patients underwent a PBPC transplant, receiving a conditioning regimen containing cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and either total body irradiation, total lymphoid irradiation, or carmustine. A median number of 4.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were obtained with a median of three leukapheresis procedures. Mobilization of PBPCs using chemotherapy plus G-CSF was superior to G-CSF alone (6.7 x 10(6) versus 1.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.0002). Poorer mobilization of progenitor cells was observed in patients who had previously received stem cell-toxic chemotherapy, including (a) nitrogen mustard, procarbazine, melphalan, carmustine or > 7.5 g of cytarabine chemotherapy premobilization (2.0 x 10(6) versus 6.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.005), or (b) > or = 11 cycles of any previous chemotherapy (2.6 x 10(6) versus 6.7 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg; P = 0.02). Platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter was delayed in patients who received < 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells (median, 13 versus 22 days; P = 0.06). Patients who received > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization tended to have delayed platelet recovery to > 20,000/microliter and to require more platelet transfusions than less extensively pretreated patients (median, 13.5 versus 23.5 days; P = 0.15; median number of platelet transfusion episodes, 13 versus 9; P = 0.17). These data suggest that current strategies to mobilize PBPCs may be suboptimal in patients who have received either stem cell-toxic chemotherapy or > or = 11 cycles of chemotherapy prior to PBPC mobilization. Alternative approaches, such as ex vivo expansion or the use of other growth factors in addition to G-CSF, may improve mobilization of progenitor cells for PBPC transplantation.     

Combination chemotherapy with mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX, etoposide (MIME) and G-CSF can efficiently mobilize PBPC in patients with Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Many centers use CY and G-CSF to mobilize PBPC. In this study we explored whether a standard chemotherapy regimen consisting of mitoguazon, ifosfamide, MTX and etoposide (MIME) combined with G-CSF was capable of mobilizing PBPC in lymphoma patients. Twelve patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and 38 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were mobilized with MIME/G-CSF. Most patients were heavily treated with different chemotherapy regimens receiving a median of 11 cycles (range 3 to 20) of chemotherapy prior to mobilization. It was found that the optimal time of PBPC harvest was at days 12 and 13 after initiating the mobilization regimen. The median number of collected CD34+ cells per kg body weight was 7.1 x 10(6) (range 0.5-26.2). More than 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg were achieved in 69% of the patients after one apheresis. When additional cycles of apheresis were done, only 6% failed to harvest this number of CD34+ cells. There was a statistically significant inverse correlation between the number of prior chemotherapy cycles and CD34+ cell yield (P = 0.003). No such association was found between CD34+ cell yield and prior radiotherapy. When MIME/G-CSF was compared with Dexa-BEAM/G-CSF, it was found that MIME/G-CSF tended to be more efficient in mobilizing PBPC in spite of being less myelotoxic. All patients transplanted with MIME/G-CSF mobilized PBPC had fast and sustained engraftment. These results demonstrate that an ordinary salvage chemotherapy regimen, such as MIME combined with G-CSF can be successfully used to mobilize PBPC.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in children using G-CSF after carboplatin containing myelosuppressive chemotherapy

PURPOSE: Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) apheresis provides an alternative to autologous marrow harvest as a source of hematologic stem cells for transplantation in children with solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight children with metastatic or recurrent solid tumors underwent 27 apheresis procedures. Recovery from myelosuppressive chemotherapy occurred without continuous daily growth factor support prior to mobilization. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) at 16 microgs/kg/day was used to increase stem cells in the peripheral circulation. CD 34 positive cells, mononuclear cells (MNC), and CFU-GM were measured in the apheresis products. Prior chemotherapy was examined as a clinical factor that affected PBSC yield. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between CD 34+/kg and CFU-GM/kg of the products (r = 0.758, P < 0.001). Patients receiving cumulative doses of carboplatin over 1,600 mg/m2 produced adequate MNC (1 x 10(8)/kg) but yielded significantly less CD 34+ cells or CFU-GM than those patients receiving less carboplatin. Prior doses of etoposide and ifosfamide did not effect PBSC yield. CONCLUSIONS: The mobilization technique was well tolerated, and the products obtained produced trilineage engraftment in the patients that underwent peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Peripheral blood stem cell apheresis in children can be optimized by selection of appropriate candidates and mobilization with G-CSF after an absence of hematopoietic growth factor support.     

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) dose-dependent efficacy in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients who had failed initial mobilization with chemotherapy and G-CSF

For 10 consecutive patients in our unit who did not show a significant rise in blood progenitor cells within 14 days following chemotherapy and G-CSF, we increased the G-CSF dose from 5 to 10 microg/kg/day (n = 9) or from 10 to 15 microg/kg/day (n = 1). As a result, there were significant increases in total yield as well as yield per apheresis of mononuclear cells, CD34+ cells and CFU-GM (P < 0.025, <0.01 and <0.005, respectively). After G-CSF dose escalation, six of the 10 patients had sufficient CD34+ cells for performing transplantation. These results demonstrate a dose-dependent response of progenitor cell mobilization by G-CSF when used in combination with chemotherapy. Moreover, increasing the dose of G-CSF as late as the third week of mobilization may still provide sufficient cell yield even with patients who did not show a significant mobilization with conventional doses of G-CSF.     

Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization

BACKGROUND: We compared hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection and neoplastic cell contamination in breast cancer patients given cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or G-CSF alone for mobilization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 57 stage II-III breast cancer patients, CD34+ cells, colony-forming units-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM), early HPC and breast cancer cells were counted in HPC collections obtained after CTX plus G-CSF (n = 27) or G-CSF-alone mobilization (n = 30). RESULTS: The CD34+ cell collection was about two-fold greater after CTX plus G-CSF mobilization (11.0 +/- 7.9 vs. 5.8 +/- 3.5 x 10(6)/kg, P < 0.001). Similarly, the total number of CFU-GM, CD34+CD38- cells and of week-5 cobblestone area forming cells (CAFC) collected was significantly higher in patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF. Breast cancer cells were found in the apheresis products of 22% of patients mobilized with CTX plus G-CSF and in 10% of patients mobilized with G-CSF alone (P = 0.36). Of seven patients who failed G-CSF-alone mobilization and eventually underwent chemotherapy plus G-CSF mobilization, none had cytokeratin-positive cells after G-CSF mobilization, whereas four out of seven had cytokeratin-positive cells after chemotherapy plus G-CSF (P = 0.07 by chi 2 test). CONCLUSION: The CTX plus G-CSF mobilization protocol was associated with a significantly higher HPC collection. However, this benefit was not accompanied by a reduction in the incidence of tumor-contaminated HPC graft.     

The role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in mobilization and transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor and stem cells

The article provides a review of the role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization and transplantation of peripheral blood progenitor and stem cells. Recombinant gene technology has permitted the production of highly purified material for therapeutic use in humans. Progenitor cells can be assessed using semisolid and liquid culture assays or direct immunofluorescence analysis of cells expressing CD34. This antigen is found on lineage-determined hematopoietic progenitor cells as well as on more primitive stem cells with extensive self-renewal capacity. Administration of G-CSF during steady-state hematopoiesis or following cytotoxic chemotherapy leads to an increase of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the peripheral blood. The level of circulating CD34+ cells post-chemotherapy is greater compared with G-CSF administration during steady state. On the other hand, CD34+ cells harvested post-chemotherapy contain a smaller proportion of more primitive progenitor cells (CD34+/HLA-DR- or CD34+/CD38-) compared with G-CSF treatment alone. Independent of the mobilization modality, the amount of previous cytotoxic chemo- and radiotherapy adversely affects the yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells. While continuous subcutaneous administration of G-CSF between 5 and 16 micrograms/kg bodyweight is preferred, additional dose-finding studies may be helpful to optimize current dose schedules. Adhesion molecules like L-selectin, VLA (very late antigen)-4 and LFA (leukocyte function antigen)-1 are likely to play a role in mobilization, since these antigens are expressed on CD34+ cells from bone marrow in different densities compared with blood-derived CD34+ cells collected following G-CSF-supported cytotoxic chemotherapy. It is also relevant for transplantation that during G-CSF-enhanced recovery post-chemotherapy, peripheral blood is enriched with a greater proportion of CD34+ cells expressing Thy-1 in comparison with CD34+ cells from bone marrow samples obtained on the same day or before the mobilization therapy was started. The early nature of the CD34+/Thy-1+ cells is very likely since this phenotype has been found on stem cells from human fetal liver and bone marrow and on cord blood cells. As a result, G-CSF-mobilized blood stem cells provide rapid and sustained engraftment following high-dose therapy, including myeloablative regimens. Positive selection of CD34+ cells as well as ex vivo expansion using different cytokines are currently being investigated for purging and improvement of short-term recovery post-transplantation. Future developments include the use of blood-derived hematopoietic stem cells for somatic gene therapy. The availability of growth factors has been an important prerequisite for the development of these new avenues for cell therapy.     

High-dose etoposide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells: efficacy and toxicity at three dose levels

High-dose etoposide (2.0-2.4 g m(-2)) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is an effective strategy to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs), although in some patients this is associated with significant toxicity. Sixty-three patients with malignancy were enrolled into this non-randomized sequential study. The majority (55/63, 87%) had received at least two prior regimens of chemotherapy, and seven patients had previously failed to mobilize following high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. Consecutive patient groups received etoposide at three dose levels [2.0 g m(-2) (n = 22), 1.8 g m(-2) (n = 20) and 1.6 g m(-2) (n = 21)] followed by daily G-CSF. Subsequent leukaphereses were assayed for CD34+ cell content, with a target total collection of 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Toxicity was assessed by the development of significant mucositis, the requirement for parenteral antibiotics or blood component support and rehospitalization incidence. Ten patients (16%) had less than the minimum target yield collected. Median collections in the three groups were 4.7 (2 g m(-2)), 5.7 (1.8 g m(-2)) and 6.5 (1.6 g m(-2)) x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1). Five of the seven patients who had previously failed cyclophosphamide mobilization achieved more than the target yield. Rehospitalization incidence was significantly lower in patients receiving 1.6 g m(-2) etoposide than in those receiving 2.0 g m(-2) (P = 0.03). These data suggest that high-dose etoposide with G-CSF is an efficient mobilization regimen in the majority of heavily pretreated patients, including those who have previously failed on high-dose cyclophosphamide with G-CSF. An etoposide dose of 1.6 g m(-2) appears to be as effective as higher doses but less toxic.     

Randomized comparison of progenitor-cell mobilization using chemotherapy, stem-cell factor, and filgrastim or chemotherapy plus filgrastim alone in patients with ovarian cancer

PURPOSE: This was the first randomized study to investigate the efficacy of peripheral-blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization using stem-cell factor (SCF) in combination with filgrastim (G-CSF) following chemotherapy compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with ovarian cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide and randomized to receive filgrastim 5 microg/kg alone or filgrastim 5 microg/kg plus SCF. The dose of SCF was cohort-dependent (5, 10, 15, and 20 microg/kg), with 12 patients in each cohort, nine of whom received SCF plus filgrastim and the remaining three patients who received filgrastim alone. On recovery from the WBC nadir, patients underwent a single apheresis. RESULTS: SCF in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy enhanced the mobilization of progenitor cells compared with that produced by filgrastim alone following chemotherapy. This enhancement was dose-dependent for colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM), burst-forming unit-erythrocyte (BFU-E), and CD34+ cells in both the peripheral blood and apheresis product. In the apheresis product, threefold to fivefold increases in median CD34+ and progenitor cell yields were obtained in patients treated with SCF 20 microg/kg plus filgrastim compared with yields obtained in patients treated with filgrastim alone. Peripheral blood values of CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CD34+ cells per milliliter remained above defined threshold levels longer with higher doses of SCF. The higher doses of SCF offer a greater window of opportunity in which to perform the apheresis to achieve high yields. CONCLUSION: SCF (15 or 20 microg/kg) in combination with filgrastim following chemotherapy is an effective way of increasing progenitor cell yields compared with filgrastim alone following chemotherapy.     

Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells

The availability of hematopoietic growth factors has greatly facilitated the mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC). It was the aim of this double-blind study to compare the PBSC-mobilizing efficacy of recombinant human G-CSF and GM-CSF when administered post-chemotherapy. Twenty-six patients with relapsed Hodgkin's disease were included in the study. Their median age was 31 years (range, 22-59) and 14 patients were males and 12 were females. Patients were pretreated with a median of eight cycles of cytotoxic chemotherapy, while 18 patients had undergone extended field irradiation. The patients received dexamethasone 24 mg days 1-7, melphalan 30 mg/m2 day 3, BCNU 60 mg/m2 day 3, etoposide 75 mg/m2 days 4-7, Ara-C 100 mg/m2 twice daily days 4-7 (Dexa-BEAM). Twelve patients were randomized to receive 5/microg/kg/day G-CSF and 14 patients to receive 5 microg/kg/day GM-CSF, both administered subcutaneously starting on day 1 after the end of Dexa-BEAM. Primary endpoints of the study were the number of CD34+ cells harvested per kg body weight on the occasion of six consecutive leukaphereses and the time needed for hematological reconstitution following autografting. Twenty-one patients completed PBSC collection, and six patients of the G-CSF group and nine of the GM-CSF group were autografted. No difference was observed with respect to the median yield of CFU-GM and CD34+ cells: 32.5 x 10(4)/kg vs 31.3 x 10(4)/kg CFU-GM, and 7.6 x 10(6)/kg vs 5.6 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells, for G-CSF and GM-CSF, respectively (U test, P= 0.837 and 0.696). High-dose chemotherapy consisted of cyclophosphamide 1.7 g/m2 days 1-4, BCNU 150 mg/m2 days 1-4, etoposide 400 mg/m2 days 1-4. All patients transplanted with more than 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg had a rapid platelet recovery (20 x 10(9)/l) between 6 and 11 days and neutrophil recovery (0.5 x 10(9)/1) between 9 and 16 days, while patients transplanted with less than 5 x 10(6)/kg had a delayed reconstitution, regardless of the kind of growth factor used for PBSC mobilization. In conclusion, our data indicate that in patients with Hodgkin's disease G-CSF and GM-CSF given after salvage chemotherapy appear to be not different in their ability to mobilize PBSC resulting in a similar time needed for hematological reconstitution when autografted following high-dose therapy.     

Successful collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia following early consolidation therapy with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-supported high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone

We evaluated the feasibility of collecting peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) following two cycles of induction chemotherapy with idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide (ICE), and one cycle of consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM). Thirty-six patients of the multicentre treatment trial AML HD93 were enrolled in this study, and a sufficient number of PBPC was harvested in 30 (83%). Individual peak concentrations of CD34+ cells in the blood varied (range 13.1-291.5/microl; median 20.0/microl). To reach the target quantity of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, between one and six (median two) leukaphereses (LP) were performed. The LP products contained between 0.2 x 10(6) and 18.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (median 1.2 x 10(6)/kg). Multivariate analysis showed that the white blood cell count prior to HAM and the time interval from the start of HAM therapy to reach an unsupported platelet count > 20 x 10(9)/l were predictive for the peak value of CD34+ cells in the blood during the G-CSF stimulated haematological recovery. In 16 patients an intraindividual comparison was made between bone marrow (BM) and PBPC grafts. Compared to BM grafts, PBPC grafts contained 14-fold more MNC, 5-fold more CD34+ cells and 36-fold more CFU-GM. A CD34+ subset analysis showed that blood-derived CD34+ cells had a more immature phenotype as indicated by a lower mean fluorescence intensity for HLA-DR and CD38. In addition, the proportion of CD34+/Thy-1+ cells tended to be greater in the PBPC grafts. The data indicate that sufficient PBPC can be collected in the majority of patients with AML following intensive double induction and first consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone.     

Stromal factors support the expansion of the whole hemopoietic spectrum from bone marrow CD34+DR- cells and of some hemopoietic subsets from CD34+ and CD34+DR+ cells

Ex vivo expanded bone marrow CD34+DR- cells could offer a graft devoid of malignant cells able to promptly reconstitute hemopoiesis after transplant. We investigated the specific expansion requirements of this subpopulation compared to the more mature CD34+ and CD34+DR+ populations. The role of stromal factors was assessed by comparing the expansion obtained when the cells were cultured in (1) long-term bone marrow culture (LTBMC) medium conditioned by an irradiated human BM stroma (CM), (2) medium supplemented with 15% FBS (FBSM) and (3) non-conditioned LTBMC medium (LTM) for 21 days. The effect of the addition of G-CSF (G) and/or of MIP-1alpha (M) to a combination of IL-3, SCF, IL-6 and IL-11 (3, S, 6, 11) was analyzed. Compared to CD34+DR- cells, CD34+ and CD34+DR+ cells gave rise to a similar number of viable cells and to a lower progenitor expansion. The expansion potential of CD34+ and CD34+DR+ cells was equivalent in CM and in FBSM except for both the emergence of CD61 + megakaryocytic cells and LTC-IC maintenance which were improved by culture in CM. In contrast, expansion from CD34+DR- cells was enhanced by CM for all the parameters tested. Compared to FBSM, CM induced a higher level of CFU-GM and BFU-E expansion and allowed the emergence of CD61+ cells. HPP-CFC were maintained or expanded in CM but decreased in FBSM. Compared to input, the number of LTC-IC remaining after 21 days of CD34+DR- expansion culture was strongly decreased in FBSM and variably maintained or expanded in CM. Comparison with LTM indicated that stroma conditioning is responsible for this effect. G-CSF significantly improved CFU-GM and HPP-CFC expansion from CD34+DR- cells without being detrimental to the LTC-IC pool. The growth of CD61+ cells was significantly enhanced by G-CSF in CM. Addition of MIP-1alpha had no significant effect either on progenitor expansion or on LTC-IC, regardless of culture medium. We conclude that factors present in stroma- conditioned medium are necessary to support the expansion of the whole spectrum of hematopoietic cells from CD34+DR- cells and to support the expansion of cell subsets from CD34+ and CD34+DR+.     

Giant cell tumor of bone with selective metastases to mediastinal lymph nodes

We examined the efficiency of disease-specific "standard" chemotherapies epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (EC); cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, etoposide, prednisolone (CHOEP); epirubicin, ifosfamide (EPI/IFOS) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in comparison to well-characterized mobilization protocols, i.e. etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, epirubicin (VIPE) and dexamethasone, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan (DexaBEAM). Twenty-seven patients with various malignancies underwent 75 apheresis procedures for PBPC collection. Median cell yields from all 75 aphereses were 1.18 x 10(5) mononuclear cells/kg [range (0.28-3.7) x 10)8)], 1.4 x 10(5) granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units (CFU-GM)/kg [range (0.2-11) x 10(5)] and 3.3 x 10(6) CD34+cells/kg [range (0.35-17.7) x 10(6). CD34+/ CD90+ cells could be mobilized by all mobilization regimens used. The difference observed in the mobilization of CD34+ cells was only of low significance when the mobilization regimens were compared, whereas the mobilizations of MNC and CFU-GM were significantly different between the groups. Breast cancer patients treated with the VIPE regimen (including pretreated women) had a significantly higher CFU-GM rate than patients treated with EC (P=0.0005). Mobilized CD34+ PBPC were correlated with CFU-GM in all apheresis products. The linear correlation coefficients differed for the various mobilization groups: DexaBEAM (r=0.9, P < 0.0001), VIPE (r=0.68, P=0.0024), CHOEP (r=0.52, P=0.022), EPI/ IFOS (r=0.34, P=0.11) and EC (r=0.23, P=0.2). We conclude that clonogenic assays can provide additional information about the autotransplant quality, particularly when alternative or new mobilization regimens are being investigated.     

Factors affecting the efficiency of collection of CD34-positive peripheral blood cells by a blood cell separator

BACKGROUND: The yield of CD34-positive cells obtained from an apheresis procedure is determined, in part, by the efficiency of collection. Optimization of the efficiency of CD34-positive peripheral blood cell collection requires identification of predictive factors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Demographic, stem cell collection, mobilization, and disease-related measures from autologous and allogeneic donors undergoing 252 progenitor cell apheresis procedures were retrospectively reviewed. Statistical relationships between CD34 collection efficiency and the various measures were determined by correlation and multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: CD34 collection efficiency inversely correlated with the peripheral white cell count, hematocrit, and serum albumin concentration (R2 = 0.29). White cell count was the single best predictor of CD34 efficiency (R2 = 0.19). Donor groups with cytopenias (patients vs. normal donors; increased cycles of prior chemotherapy; bone marrow involvement; chemotherapy plus growth factor mobilization) had higher collection efficiencies. Only 29 percent of the variability in the data could be attributed to white cell count, hematocrit, and albumin concentration. The majority of the remaining variability was due to unexplained differences between donors. CONCLUSION: CD34 collection efficiencies show considerable variation. Higher peripheral white cell counts, hematocrits, and/or albumin concentrations result in decreased CD34 collection efficiency, but most of the variability in the data is not accounted for by these three factors.     

Composition and function of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell harvests from patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue has been proposed as an intensive therapy for severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In view of previous observations of abnormal haemopoiesis in RA patients, the composition and function of peripheral blood stem cell harvests (PBSCH) was investigated. Compared with PBSCH from healthy allogeneic donors mobilized with the same dose of G-CSF (filgrastim; 10 microg/kg/d, n = 14), RA PBSCH (n = 9) contained significantly fewer mononuclear cells (375 v 569 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.03) and CD34+ cells (2.7 v 5.8 x 10(6)/kg, P = 0.003). However, there were increased proportions of CD14+ cells (P = 0.006) and CD14+ CD15+ cells (the phenotype of previously described 'abnormal' myeloid cells, P = 0.002) in the RA PBSCH which translated into 3.5- and 7-fold increases respectively on a per CD34+ cell basis. There were no differences in T-cell activation status as judged by proportions of CD4+ and CD8+ expressing CD45RA, CD45RO, HLA-DR and CD28 (RA PBSCH, n = 7, donor PBSCH, n = 5, P = 0.2-0.7). Phytohaemagglutinin responses determined fluorocytometrically with induction of CD69 expression were reduced in CD4+ and CD8+ cells following filgrastim administration in 3/3 RA patients tested. Compared with bone marrow as a potential source of CD34+ cells, PBSCH contained 11-fold more T cells (P < 0.0005), 8-fold more B cells (P < 0.0005) and 4-fold more monocytes (P = 0.02). In short-term methylcellulose culture there were no differences in colony counts (CFU-GM, CFU-GEMM, BFU-E) per CD34+ cell from PBSCH from RA patients (n = 11) and healthy donors (n = 10). Long-term culture initiator cells were cultured successfully from cryopreserved PBSCH from RA patients (n = 9). In conclusion, PBSCH from RA patients differed significantly in composition from normal individuals, but in vitro studies support normal stem and progenitor cell function. Changes in T-cell function occur during mobilization in RA patients. This work provides reassurance for the use of PBSCH as haematological rescue and baseline data for clinical trials of graft manipulation strategies in patients with RA.     

A successful case report of one and one half ventricle repair for pure pulmonary stenosis in a 4-year-old girl]

We tested two positive selection techniques for separation of CD34+ cells from bone marrow and analyzed the yields of CD34+ cells, BFU-E, CFU-GM, CFU-MK and LTC-IC after selection and expansion. An immunoadsorption procedure (CellPro) and an immunomagnetic (Baxter) CD34+ cell separation method were employed to purify the same bone marrow samples from seven normal subjects. Mean yields of CFU-GM and CFU-MK and absolute numbers of LTC-ICs were not different in the two purified cell populations. In contrast, the mean recovery of BFU-E was significantly lower for the immunoadsorption (21 +/- 14%) than for the immunomagnetic technique (44 +/- 27%). After separation, CD34+ cells were evaluated in 10-day liquid cultures for their expansion capacity in terms of total cells and progenitors. The expansion capacity of progenitors such as CFU-GM, CFU-MK and especially BFU-E selected by immunoadsorption was higher than the capacity of progenitors obtained by immunomagnetism, although final total and progenitor cell numbers are similar. Our results suggest that the populations separated by the two techniques differ mainly in the expansion capacity of progenitors and in the recovery of BFU-E after the selection procedure. These differences between two methods, which already are widely employed in research and in clinical transplantation, should be taken into account when considering the aims of the experiments.     

Synergy of growth factors during mobilization of peripheral blood precursor cells with recombinant human Flt3-ligand and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in rabbits

The potential of recombinant human (rh)Flt3 ligand (FL), alone or in combination with other recombinant growth factors, to mobilize peripheral blood precursor cells (PBPCs) was examined in an animal model. Adult outbred New Zealand White rabbits received subcutaneous injections daily for 14 days in a standardized protocol; whole blood cell counts and colony-forming unit-granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) colonies were measured 3 times weekly during the injection period and for an additional observation period of 14 days. Two animals in each group were treated as follows: 200 or 500 microg/kg FL, 10 microg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 10 or 75 microg/kg stem cell factor (SCF), 10 microg/kg G-CSF + 500 microg/kg FL, 10 microg/kg G-CSF + 75 microg/kg SCF + 500 microg/kg FL. Both G-CSF and FL induced a sustained and dose-dependent increase in the leukocyte count to a maximum of 5-fold. They were additive in combination, leading to a tenfold increase in white blood cell counts. No consistent pattern was observed for platelet counts or red blood cells. No toxic side effects were seen. Both G-CSF and FL mobilized CFU-GM in a dose-dependent fashion to a 59-fold increase for G-CSF and 116-fold for FL. Maximum mobilization occurred on day 4 with G-CSF and on day 11 with FL. G-CSF + FL in combination acted synergistically, inducing a 503-fold increase of CFU-GM over baseline. The addition of SCF to this combination did not alter leukocyte counts or CFU-GM mobilization. Our results indicate that FL is a potent and safe agent for the mobilization of PB-PCs and is synergistic with G-CSF.     

Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by disease-specific chemotherapy in patients with soft tissue sarcoma

We investigated peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization by disease-specific chemotherapy in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Nine patients, five females and four males, aged 12-51 years, pretreated by one to nine courses of cytotoxic chemotherapy, underwent STS-specific mobilization followed by G-CSF at 5 microg/kg/day. PBPC were collected by 19 conventional-volume aphereses (8-12 l) with one to four procedures in individual patients. Leukaphereses started on median day 15 (range 13-18) from the first day of mobilization chemotherapy at medians of 25.8 x 10(3) WBC/microl (6.8-46.9), 3.5 x 10(3) MNC/microl (1.1-8.8), 122 x 10(3) platelets/microl (72-293) and 30.7 CD34+ cells/microl (6.7-207.8). Cumulative harvests resulted in medians of 4.6 x 10(8) MNC/kg (3.0-6.4), 2.9 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (1.1-11.1) and 12.0 x 10(4) CFU-GM/kg (2.0-37.8). Eight patients underwent high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by PBPC rescue. Seven patients recovered hematopoiesis at medians of 12 days (8-15) for ANC >0.5 x 10(3)/microl and 14 days (8-27) for platelets >20 x 10(3)/microl. One patient, who received 1.6 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, exhibited delayed ANC recovery on day +37 and failed to recover platelets until hospital discharge on day +55. We conclude that in patients with metastatic STS, who are pretreated by standard chemotherapy, PBPC can be mobilized by a further course of STS-specific chemotherapy plus G-CSF. One to four conventional-volume aphereses result in PBPC autografts that can serve as hematopoietic rescue for patients scheduled for HDCT.     

Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells after the administration of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of 497 patients

BACKGROUND: There is great interpatient variability in the number of peripheral blood stem cells collected, as measured by CD34+ cell content, after the administration of chemotherapy and a growth factor. The ability to predict patients who fail to yield adequate quantities of CD34+ cells would be of value. However, very few reports include large numbers of patients treated in an identical fashion. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Between 1991 and 1995, 497 consecutive patients with a variety of malignant diseases received cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), etoposide (600 mg/m2), and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (6 micrograms/kg/day) for mobilization and collection of a target dose > or = 2.5 x 10(8) CD34+ cells per kg. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with failure to achieve this target harvest. RESULTS: A median of 14.71 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg (range, 0.08-137.55) was harvested with a median of 2 (range, 1-11) apheresis procedures. Ninety-one percent of patients yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(5) CD34+ cells per kg. Patients with Stage II-III breast cancer, who had pretreatment platelet counts > or = 150 x 10(9) per L and patients who underwent < or = 1 prior chemotherapy regimen had improved CD34+ cell yields. However, most patients with adverse risk factors yielded > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. CONCLUSION: A regimen of cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor led to the successful collection of adequate numbers of CD34+ cells in most patients without excessive toxicity. These observations confirm previous reports that intense prior therapy adversely affects the quantity of CD34+ cells harvested. Pretreatment and posttreatment variables did not predict with any certainty the small fraction of patients who fail to yield > or = 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg via multiple apheresis procedures.     

Mifepristone modulation of ACTH and CRH regulation of bovine adrenocorticosteroidogenesis in vitro

In this article, we review neoplastic contamination in the peripheral blood (PB) of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) upon stem cell mobilization. We first evaluated PB samples from pretreated MM patients following administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide (Cy, 7 g/m2 or 4 g/m2) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for the presence of myeloma cells as well as hematopoietic progenitors. Plasma cells containing intracytoplasmic immunoglobulin (cIg) were counted by immunofluorescence microscopy after incubation with appropriate antisera against light and heavy chain Ig. Flow cytometry studies were performed to determine the presence of malignant B lineage elements, using monoclonal antibodies against the CD19 antigen and the monotypic light chain. Prior to PBSC mobilization, circulating plasma cells were detected in all MM patients at 0.1%-1.8% of the mononuclear cell (MNC) fraction (mean value 0.7 +/- 0.4% SD). In these patients, a higher absolute number of PB neoplastic cells was detected after administration of chemotherapy and G-CSF. Kinetic analysis showed a pattern of tumor cell mobilization similar to that of normal hematopoietic progenitors, with the peak coinciding with the optimal period for the collection of PBSC. The absolute number of plasma cells showed a 10-50-fold increase over the baseline value. Apheresis products contained 0.7 +/- 0.2% SD myeloma cells (range 0.2%-2.7%), which demonstrated the capacity of plasma cells to proliferate, differentiate, and mature in response to c-kit ligand (SCF), IL-3, IL-6, and a combination of IL-3 and IL-6. Subsequently, in an attempt to reduce tumor cell contamination prior to autologous transplantation, circulating hematopoietic CD34+ cells were highly enriched by avidin-biotin immunoabsorption, cryopreserved, and used to reconstitute bone marrow (BM) function after myeloablative therapy in 13 patients. The median purity of the enriched CD34+ cell population was 89.5% (range 51%-94%), with a 75-fold enrichment compared with the pretreatment samples. The median overall recovery of CD34+ cells and CFU-GM was 58% (range 33%-95%) and 45% (range 7%-100%), respectively. Positive selection of CD34+ cells resulted in 2.5-3 log depletion of plasma cells and CD 19+ B lineage cells as determined by immunofluorescence studies, although DNA analysis of the CDR III region of the IgH gene demonstrated the persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) in 5 of 6 patient samples studied. Myeloma patients were reinfused with enriched CD34+ cells after myeloablative therapy consisting of total body irradiation (TBI, 1000 cGy) and high-dose melphalan (140 mg/m2) or melphalan (200 mg/m2) alone. They received a median of 5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and showed a rapid reconstitution of hematopoiesis. The median time to 0.5 x 10(9) neutrophils, 20 x 10(9) and 50 x 10(9) platelets/L of PB was 10, 11, and 12 days, respectively. These results, as well as other clinically significant parameters, did not significantly differ from those of patients (n = 13) receiving unmanipulated PBSC following the same pretransplant conditioning regimen. Our data demonstrate the concomitant mobilization of tumor cells and hematopoietic progenitors in the PB of MM patients. Positive selection of CD34+ cells reduces the contamination of myeloma cells from the apheresis products up to 3 log and provides a cell suspension capable of restoring normal hematopoiesis following a TBI-containing conditioning regimen.