Effect of hot-etching treatment on shear bond strength of zirconia to resin cement

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of hot-etching surface treatment on the shear bond strength between zirconia ceramics and resin cement. Ceramic cylinders were divided randomly into 10 groups (n?=?10) according to different surface treatments (blank control; airborne particle abrasion; hot-etching for 10?min; hot-etching for 30?min; hot-etching for 60?min) and whether or not performed thermal cycling fatigue test. Flat enamel surfaces, were prepared from human permanent incisors and were bonded to the zirconia discs. All specimens were subjected to shear bond strength test by a universal testing machine. All data were statistically analysed using one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparison least significant difference tests (α?=?0.05). Hot-etching for 60?min treatment produced higher bond strengths than the other treatment. Surface treatment of zirconia with a hot-etching solution might enhance surface roughness and bond strength between zirconia and resin cement.     

Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cement to zirconia ceramic and metal alloy*

The bonding of resin cement to ceramic materials plays an important role in dentistry. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of various surface treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of zirconia ceramic and metal alloy. A total of 60 specimens were prepared from Y-TZP ceramic and metal alloy. The specimens were divided into three subgroups (n = 10) that received different surface treatments for each material. An Er:YAG laser (ER), a femtosecond laser (FS), and air-borne particle abrasion (A) were employed as surface treatments. One specimen from each group was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 500 x magnification after surface treatments. The self-adhesive resin cement was then bonded to the treated surfaces using a Teflon mold. The specimens were thermocycled for 5,000 cycles at 5–55 °C, and then the SBS test was performed. Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests were used to determine the differences between the groups (p = 0.05), and failure modes were evaluated for each specimen. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences between the surface treatment methods. The mean SBS values of the air-borne particle-abraded groups were higher than those of the other groups. The femtosecond-irradiated groups of each material showed significantly higher SBS values than the Er:YAG-irradiated groups (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, air-borne particle abrasion and the femtosecond laser were more effective than Er:YAG laser treatment.     

Effect of femtosecond laser beam angle and formed shape on surface roughness and shear bond strength between zirconia and resin cement

Achieving adhesion between resin cement and zirconia requires pretreatment of the surface. This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of femtosecond laser beam angle and the shape of the formed surfaces, on the roughness and shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement to zirconia ceramic. Seventy Y-TZP ceramic specimens were divided into seven groups (n = 10). A femtosecond laser irradiation was performed on the ceramic surface of three shapes (spiral (SP), square (SQ) and circular (CI) and at two angles (30 and 90°) to give SP-30, SQ-30 and CI-30 and SP-90, SQ-90 and CI-90, respectively. After treatment, the surface roughness of all specimens was evaluated using a profilometer. One specimen from each group was analysed using a scanning electron microscope. The bonded specimens were thermocycled 5000 times and then an SBS test was performed. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to analyse surface roughness and SBS values. The control group had statistically lower surface roughness (R_a) values than the treated groups (p < 0.05). SP-30 and SQ-30 laser treated specimens showed higher R_a values than the other specimens. Statistically significant SBS values (p = 0.000) were observed between the groups. All laser treated samples showed greater SBS compared to the control group. SP-30, SQ-30 and SQ-90 groups showed the highest SBS values. Within the limitations of this experimental study, the highest mean values for R_a and SBS were achieved with SP and SQ surfaces using a 30° angle laser beam.     

Effect of different surface shapes formed by femtosecond laser on zirconia-resin cement shear bond strength

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface shapes formed by femtosecond (FS) laser on zirconia (Y-TZP)-resin cement shear bond strength (SBS). Background data: All ceramic restoration is used as an alternative to metal-ceramic restorations, due to its better aesthetics, strength, and toughness properties. However, bond strength of restoration to tooth and other materials is effective to long term success of the restoration, and to achieve it surface treatment is required on ceramic surface. Materials and methods: Forty square-shaped zirconia samples were prepared and assigned to four groups of 10. The details of the groups are as follows: Group A, square-shaped recessed surface; Group B, square-shaped projection surface; Group C, circular-shaped recessed surface; Group D, circular-shaped projection surface. The SBSs values were performed with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. The data were analyzed statistically using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey HSD multiple comparisons tests. Results: The one-way ANOVA results on SBSs of the zirconia material bonded with resin cement revealed significant differences among the groups (p < 0.05). The Tukey HSD test results revealed that Group B and D had significantly higher SBS values than other groups (p < 0.05), but there were no significant differences between each other (p > 0.05). Additionally, Group A and C had significantly lower values than other groups (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Different surface shapes formed by FS laser provided a significant increase in SBSs. The SBS values of projection surfaces of circular and square-shapes are greater than that of recessed surfaces of circular and square-shapes.     

Influence of post-etch cleaning and silane heat treatment on resin bond strength to silica-based leucite: an in vitro study

Adhesive cementation of bonded all-ceramic restorations is critical for their long-term clinical performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of post-etch cleaning (PEC) and silane heat treatment on the micro-tensile bond strength of silica-based leucite (SBLE) ceramic when bonded to composite resin. Twenty-four blocks of SBLE ceramic (HeraCeram Press®, Heraeus Kulzer GmbH Grüner Weg 11 63450 Hanau) were fabricated and bonding surfaces were etched using 9.5% hydrofluoric acid. Six experimental groups were made from the various surface treatment combinations including: PEC (37.5% phosphoric acid for 1 min, rinsed with water for 20 s and ultrasonic bath immersion), silane application and silane heat treatment (100 °C for 5 min). An adhesive resin and a light-cured restorative composite were used to bond the ceramic and composite resin blocks under standard conditions. Three hundred and sixty specimen sticks (8 × 1 mm²) were subjected to micro-tensile testing. The means of the micro-tensile bond strength (μ-TBS) were analysed with ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test. The specimens tested were assessed for mode of failure using scanning electron microscopy. The highest μ-TBS value (38.25 ± 3.40 MPa) of the specimen was achieved by PEC and heated silane. PEC and silane application showed statistically significant improvements in the μ-TBS (p < 0.01). The mean maximum difference was due to PEC (18.91 ± 3.70 MPa). In the surface treatment of SBLE ceramics, PEC had the most significant factor which affected the μ-TBS of resin composite.     

Influence of different surface treatments on zirconia/resin shear bond strength using one-bottle universal adhesive

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to evaluate the effect of different treatments on the zirconia/resin shear bond strength (SBS) using commercial one-bottle universal adhesive. Zirconia discs with different surface treatments (blank control; airborne-particle-abrasion; glazing) were bonded to the bovine enamel surfaces using one-bottle universal adhesive. All specimens were tested for SBS (MPa) before and after 10000 thermocycles. Statistically analysis were conducted by using one-way analysis of variance and multiple-comparison least significant difference tests (α = 0.05). Airborne-particle-abrasion group showed higher SBS (36.19 ± 11.86) than control group (14.98 ± 5.90) and glazing group (10.63 ± 5.39) (p < 0.05). After thermocycling test, the SBS significantly decreased for control group (8.84 ± 2.55) and glazing group (6.18 ± 2.78) while not for airborne-particle-abrasion group (41.5 ± 7.95). One-bottle universal adhesives combined with airborne-particle-abrasion showed quite high SBS of zirconia/resin, which was appropriate for bonding of zirconia restoration.     

Effects of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to zirconia

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of resin cements to zirconia. Material and methods: Sintered zirconia specimens (n = 192) were divided into four different surface treatment groups: control (no treatment); airborne-particle abrasion; glaze layer and hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, and hot etching solution application. Then, each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 12), and three different resin cements were applied to the zirconia surfaces. The shear bond strength value of each specimen was measured after 5000 thermo cycles. The failure types were examined with a stereomicroscope and the effects of the surface treatments were evaluated with a scanning electron microscope. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results: The surface treatment and resin cement type significantly affected the bond strength results (p < 0.05). For all resin cements, the airborne-particle abrasion treatment increased the shear bond strength values (p < 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application increased shear bond strength values for all groups, except the Single Bond Universal-RelyX Unicem Aplicap group (p < 0.05). The surface roughness values of airborne-particle abraded specimens were similar to comparable values for specimens from the control group and the hot etching solution group (p > 0.05). The glaze layer & HF application group produced the highest surface roughness values (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study recommend using the appropriate combination of surface treatment and adhesive/silane coupling agent to achieve durable zirconia-resin bonding.     

The effect of different surface pretreatments on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different surface pretreatment methods on the bond strength of veneering resin to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) based aesthetic frameworks. Five hundred and forty PEEK disks were fabricated and divided into 6 pretreatment groups (n = 90); (C) untreated control group, (B) airborne-particle abrasion, (S) silica coating, (L) etching with Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser, (LB) etching with Er:YAG laser and airborne-particle abrasion and (LS) etching with Er:YAG laser and silica coating. After topographical surface examinations, specimens were conditioned with adhesive and veneering resin was polymerized onto the PEEK specimens. Twenty-four hours after veneering, specimens were subjected to thermal aging. Afterwards, shear bond strength (SBS) tests were performed and the obtained data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at a significance level of α = .05. Group B (1.58 ± 0.15 μm), Group L (1.79 ± 0.29 μm), Group LB (2.20 ± 0.23 μm) and Group LS (2.31 ± 0.52 μm) demonstrated significantly higher surface roughness (SR) values compared to Group C (1.03 ± 0.11 μm). Group B (10.97 ± 2.88 MPa), Group S (12.07 ± 2.82 MPa), Group LB (12.09 ± 2.08 MPa) and Group LS (13.14 ± 1.45 MPa) demonstrated significantly higher SBS values compared to Group C (6.35 ± 1.21 MPa). Airborne-particle abrasion, silica coating or their combined use with Er:YAG laser system establish durable bond between PEEK and resin; however, only Er:YAG laser treatment has no positive effect on resin-PEEK bond.     

Adhesion of resin cements to contaminated zirconia resin cements on zirconia: effect saliva-contamination and surface conditioning

This study evaluated the adhesion of resin cements to zirconia after saliva contamination using resin cements with different chemistries. Zirconia discs (N?=?240, n?=?10 per group) were randomly divided into three groups: (a) C: No contamination (Control), (b) S: Contamination with saliva, (c) S?+?AA: Contamination with saliva followed by air-abrasion (CoJet). While half of the specimens were not conditioned, the other half were conditioned with 37.5% H₃PO₄ for 60?s. After rinsing, all specimen surfaces were silanized (Monobond Plus). Resin cements based on either methacrylate (Variolink II–VL) or MDP monomer (Panavia 21-PN) were polymerized on the substrates. The specimens were randomly divided into two further groups to be tested either after (a) 24?h dry storage at 37?°C or (b) thermocycling (×5000, 5–55?°C). Microshear bond (MSB) tests were conducted in a Universal Testing Machine and failure types were analyzed. Data were analyzed using Univariate analysis and Tukey’s tests (alpha = 0.05). While saliva contamination, 37.5% H₃PO₄ application (p?<?.001) and aging (p?<?.05) significantly affected the bond results, cement type did not show significant difference after aging (p?>?.05). Adhesive strength of PN (1.2–4.4?MPa) on saliva contaminated and etched zirconia was more stable than that of VL (0–2.8?MPa). After aging, bond strength results decreased the most with VL (3–100%) compared to PN (32–71%) but the decrease was less in the air-abraded groups after aging (VL: 3%; PN: 32%). Exclusively adhesive failures were experienced in all groups.     

Strengthen adhesion between zirconia and resin cement using different surface modifications

The aim of this research was to assess the influence of different surface modifications on the bond strength between resin cement and zirconia ceramics. Eighty-four zirconium samples were prepared. Four different surface treatments were applied; nano-alumina coating, 2 minutes gas-phase fluorination, 50 μm alumina airborne-particle abrasion, and 50 μm airborne-particle abrasion + 2 minutes gas-phase fluorination. Then specimens were bonded to resin cement. Half of the samples were then incubated in 37°C distilled water for 24 hours. The remaining samples were subjected to thermocycling for 5000 cycles. Shear-bond strength testing was applied at a cross head speed of 5 mm/s. Two-way ANOVA was used in comparison between groups. There is a significant difference between the groups with 5000 cycles and the groups with 24 hours of water cycling. The highest shear-bond strength values were observed in the groups with airborne-particle abrasion + 2 minutes fluorination (27.57 MPa) and nano-alumina coating (26.45 MPa) which were not subjected to thermal cycling. Nano-alumina coating of the zirconia surface and the 2 minutes gas-phase fluorination method following airborne-particle abrasion process increased bond strength between resin cement and zirconia.     

Bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia after different surface treatments

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various surface treatments on the bond strength of veneering feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Methods: Fifty yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline specimens were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to various surface treatments. The groups were as follows: Group 1: control group with liner application and no further surface treatment; Group 2: air-particle abrasion with 110 μm of alumina (Al₂O₃) particles; Group 3: grinding with a diamond disk; Group 4: Nd:YAG laser irradiation (the laser and the energy parameters were 10 Hz, and 2 W and 200 mJ, and the pulse duration (short pulse) range was up to 180 μs); Group 5: selective infiltration etching (SIE). After surface treatments, a liner application was performed for all surfaces according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Veneering porcelain was applied on zirconia surfaces using a Teflon mold. Shear bond strength was tested using a universal testing machine. The fractured surface morphologies were examined with scanning electron microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests (α = .05). Results: The Megapascal values of the bonding groups were as follows: G1 = 8.62 ± 1.12, G2 = 13.87 ± 5.08, G3 = 12.31 ± 3.35, G4 = 17.32 ± 6.16, and G5 = 16.17 ± 4.55. Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and the other groups (p < 0.05). Group 4 had the highest bond strength while G1 showed the lowest bond strength. No significant differences were found between the Nd:YAG, grinding, sandblasting, and SIE groups. Conclusion: Surface treatments had different effects on the shear bond strength of feldspathic porcelain to zirconia. Surface treatment techniques used in this study can be used on zirconia specimens prior to liner application to obtain an acceptable bond strength of veneering porcelain to zirconia. The effect of Nd:YAG laser irradiation and SIE techniques on bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia should be evaluated with further studies.     

Effect of different ceramic primers on shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cement to zirconia

Purpose: This study evaluated and compared the effect of different ceramic primers on the shear bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia with and without air-particle abrasion. Material and Methods: 120 zirconia square specimens (5 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm) were fabricated. Half of the specimens were air-particle abraded (A) and the other half were left untreated (NA). Both groups were further divided into six subgroups (n = 10). Composite cylinders (2.9 mm × 3.0 mm) were fabricated and bonded to the zirconia samples with RMGIC (RelyX Plus) after different priming methods: no ceramic primer (group NS); Z-Prime (group ZP); Clearfil ceramic primer (group CP); cleaned with Ivoclean then Monobond plus (IV/MS); Monobond plus (group MS); and Rely X ceramic primer (group RX). Specimens were rinsed, stored in distilled water, and thermocycled (TC) for 10,000 cycles between 5 and 60 °C with a dwell time of 15s. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and the Tukey–Kramer method test (a = .05). Results: air-particle abrasion significantly affected bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia regardless of the primer used (p < 0.001 for all primers and the control). After TC, A-ZP (11.1 ± 0.6 MPa), A-CP (11.9 ± 0.6 MPa), and A-MS (11.9 ± 0.5 MPa) revealed the highest shear bond strength values, while NA-NS (2.9 ± 0.3 MPa) and NA-RX (4.7 ± 0.5 MPa) had the lowest. Failure modes were primarily adhesive. Conclusion: air-particle abrasion with aluminum oxide and application of MDP-based ceramic primers provide the highest bond strength of RMGIC to zirconia.     

Effects of different surface treatments of zirconia on the bond strength of self-adhesive resinous cement

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of different zirconia surface treatments on the bond strength of two self-adhesive resinous cements (SARC).

Methods: Two hundred and eight cylindrical specimens were obtained from Y-TZP zirconia (half with diameter 3.2 mm and half with 4.8 mm). After sintering and polishing, specimens were divided into four groups (n = 26), according to surface treatment: Control (no treatment); Sandblasting (Al₂O₃ particles); Rocatec (Al₂O₃ particles, tribochemical silica coating and silane application); Laser (Nd: YAG laser: 20 Hz, 100 mJ, 0.2 J/cm²). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated after the surface treatments, and the groups were divided into two subgroups (n = 13), according to the SARC tested: RelyX U200 and Bifix SE. The 2.2-mm cylinders were bonded to 4.8-mm cylinders and stressed until failure under shear using a universal testing machine. Bond strength and Ra were analyzed using ANOVA, and Tukey’s test (α = 0.05).

Results: Surface treatment was significant (p < 0.0001), but cement type (p = 0.73) was not. Related to roughness, significant differences were found for the treatment type (p < 0.0001), with laser being the treatment with higher Ra values.

Conclusions: Nd:YAG laser produced a rougher surface and a higher bond strength compared with sandblasting, silicatization, and control groups.     

Efficacy of uncommon surface treatment methods on titanium in order to improve bond strengths for adhesive cementation

The aim of this study is to comparison of effects of uncommon surface treatments, especially new alternatives on the adhesive strength between resin and titanium surfaces. Fifty-five titanium disks were prepared and they were separated into 5 groups as follows: (1) Control group; (2) Tribochemical treatment group in the laboratory; (3) Tribochemical treatment group in the clinic; (4) Acid etch group; and (5) Nd:YAG Laser-irradiated group. Surface roughness of the specimens was measured using a profilometer, and the topographic patterns were observed by scanning electron microscope. After these tests, resin cement was applied to the titanium samples. Shear bond test was performed via a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/minute. In addition, the correlation between the surface roughness and bond strength was checked using Spearman correlation test (0.01 level). The highest surface roughness value was observed for the acid etch group (1.53 μm). The highest mean shear bond strength was recorded with the tribochemical procedure group in the laboratory (13.74 MPa) and the lowest with the control group (3.69 MPa). A positive correlation was found between the bond strength and surface roughness for all groups. All of the surface treatment methods that were used in present study increased the bond strength between resin and titanium except for the laser group.     

Bond strength of short-pulsed laser-irradiated zirconia to veneer ceramic

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the effect of 1064 nm Yb-doped fiber-based nanosecond pulsed laser on surface roughness and bond strength between veneer ceramic and zirconia. Material and methods: Zirconia discs were divided into three groups: sandblasted (SB), laser irradiated (YL), and control (n?=?12). YL group was treated with ytterbium laser with the setting of 85 W/25 kHz. Sandblasting was done using 50 μm Al₂O₃ particles from a distance of 10 mm for 20 s under 3.5 atm. No surface treatment was applied to the control group. The surface roughness values and SEM images of the groups were obtained. X-ray diffraction analysis was applied to a spare sample of each group to determine the monoclinic phase ratio. The samples were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) test with a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min after being veneered. The fracture modes were evaluated. One-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s HSD tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The YL group had higher surface roughness than the control (p?≤?0.0001) and the SB group (p?=?0.007) with a mean value of 2.90 μm. The SEM images of the groups supported this result, but formation of the microcracks was more intense for the YL group. The monoclinic phase ratio was highest for the SB group. However, the differences of SBS between SB and YL groups were not statistically significant. Mostly the combined failure of samples was observed. Conclusions: Ytterbium laser treatment increased the surface roughness of zirconia, but the SBS was not higher than sandblasting. Surface roughness results did not correlate with the SBS results.     

Evaluation of different desensitizing agents effect on shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin

Desensitizing agents can inhibit the bonding strength between dentin and adhesive resin cement. This study evaluated the effects of different desensitizing agents on the shear bond strength of adhesive resin cement to dentin. Sixty freshly extracted and caries free teeth were classified into five experimental groups, randomly (n?=?12). Each group was treated with a different desensitizing agent (Teethmate, Shield Force Plus, Admira Protect and Ultra-Ez) respectively, except for an untreated control group. After desensitizing agents and adhesive resin cement were applied to each dentin surface, all specimens were stored in incubator at 37?°C for 24?h. The shear bond strength was tested with a Universal testing machine at a 0.5?mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analysed by using a statistical software (SPSS 22). The results of the measurements were analysed by Kruskal Wallis test with Bonferroni correction and multiple comparisons were made by Wilcoxon test (p???.01). Specimens were examined by a scanning electron microscope, additionally. The Shield Force Plus showed significantly the highest shear bond strength compared with other groups (p?<?.01). Ultra-Ez showed the lowest shear bond strength (p?>?.01). There was no significant difference among Teethmate and Admira Protect groups (p?>?.01). Desensitizing agents containing resin monomers increased the bonding strength, however desensitizers containing calcium phosphate, potassium nitrate and fluoride did not effect the bonding strength of resin cement to dentin.     

Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength of different composite resins

This study was aimed to observe the relationship between the different surface treatments and the bond strength of both composite based adhesive cement and zirconia ceramic. Thirty-two zirconia ceramic discs were fabricated by following the instructions of manufacturer (5 × 5 × 1.5 mm). Four subgroups were obtained from the specimens according to the specified surface treatments respectively: (a) C: control groups: no treatment; (b) SB: sandblasting with 125 μm aluminum oxide particles for 10 s; (c) SC: silica coating for 10 s; (d) Nd :YAG laser . The composite resin specimens Panavia F and Clearfil SA were introduced and polymerized to the treated bonding areas. Afterwards the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C during 24 h, and the shear test was applied. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA and Duncan tests. The bond strength was stated significantly higher in silica coating/Panavia F group (23.35 MPa). The lowest bond strength was stated in control groups cemented with Clearfil SA (12.25 MPa). As a result it was determined that the bond strength has affected the both surface treatments and cement types (p < 0.001). The silica coating –treated zirconia ceramic recorded a significant increase in mean bond strength values.     

Effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength between ceramic systems and metal brackets

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different kinds of ceramic surfaces after different surface conditioning methods. A total of 120 ceramic disks were divided into two main groups in terms of feldspathic or lithium disilicate. Each ceramic group was further subdivided into six subgroups depending on surface treatment (n = 10). The ceramic surfaces were conditioned by one of the following methods: Group C: control group; Group P: %37.5 orthophosphoric acid; Group HF: %9.6 hydrofluoric acid; Group L: Nd-YAG laser irradiation; Group SB: sandblasting with 50 µm Al₂O₃ particles; and Group DB: grinding with a diamond bur. Surface roughness value was evaluated with a digital profilometer. Surface topographies of one specimen from each group were observed by atomic force microscopy (AFM) after surface treatments. All samples were primed with silane before the bracket bonding, including the control group. Metal brackets were bonded to the specimens with a light curing composite resin. The samples were stored in distilled water for 24?h and thermocycled 2500× at 5 and 55 ºC for 30?s. Shear bond strengths between the ceramic surface and the bracket were measured with a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. Failure modes were classified as adhesive, cohesive, or mixed. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's tests (α = .05). Group SB had significantly rougher surface compared with the other groups in each ceramic system (p < .05), and Group SB demonstrated significantly higher shear bond strengths than other groups as well. Within the limitations of this study, surface conditioning methods, except for sandblasting and grinding, were associated with lower shear bond strengths; however, thermocycling may have had negative effects on bond strengths of specimens. Furthermore, in each ceramic system, there was a significant difference between surface-conditioning methods and surface roughness with regard to shear bond strength.     

Shear bond strength to enamel and failure type of different periodontal splints: an in vivo and in vitro study

The goal of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) and failure mode of four different splint materials [Polyethylene FRC Ribbond Thm (RB), Polyethylene FRC Construct (Kerr), Multifilament Fishing Line (MFL), and Non Fiber Reinforced Composite (control)]. Thirty-seven subjects were randomly divided into four splint methods. After splinting procedures, the subjects were recalled 12 months later. One hundred and sixty human mandibular incisors (for extracoronal and intracoronal splinting) and 40 sheep mandibles (only extracoronal splinting) were used for the in vitro part. The specimens were subjected to SBS at their incisoproximal contact, and debonding forces were measured with a universal testing machine (1 mm/min crosshead speed). Failure sites were examined under a stereomicroscope (×40 magnification). The SBS data were assessed via analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s tests. The survival rate was significantly affected by the splint type (RB:95.3%, Kerr:91.6%, MFL:93.5%, Control:52.5%). No statistically significant differences were found between RB, Kerr, and MFL (p > 0.05) at all in vitro parts. Intracoronal splinting showed lower SBS values than extracoronal (p < 0.05). Lower SBS values were obtained in sheep teeth than human teeth (p < 0.05). Significantly different fracture patterns were noted between groups (p < 0.05). Only resin composite application seems to be inadequate for periodontal splinting. MFL splints are also economic and quite resistant, and they might be used as an alternative to fiber-reinforced composites.     

The shear bond strength of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites with different adhesive systems and resin composite types

This study compared the effect of different adhesive systems and composite resins on the shear bond strength (SBS) of repaired high-viscosity bulk-fill composites(Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and investigated failure modes. One hundred twenty cylindrical bulk-fill composite blocks (diameter 5?mm) were fabricated and thermocycled for 5000 cycles (5–55?°C). Specimens were roughened by diamond bur and divided into 8 groups (n?=?15). Bulk-fill blocks were repaired with the same material or nanohybrid composite resin(Tetric EvoCeram Nanohybrid) (diameter 3?mm) using different adhesive systems:Tetric N-Bond Universal (TSE);37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Tetric N-Bond Universal (TER); Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); 37% phosphoric acid etching?+?Adper^TMSingle Bond 2(SB). After repair procedures, all specimens were thermocycled again. The shear bond strengths were measured for all specimens using a universal test machine (crosshead speed of 1?mm/min). Cohesive strengths of bulk-fill composites were measured and described as control group. Debonded surfaces were observed with a stereomicroscope under 10x magnification to determine mode of failure. The SBS data of all groups was statistically analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni correction test (p?<?0.05). The specimens repaired with bulk-fill composites showed significantly higher SBS values (25.86?±?5.74, 27.05?±?4.93, 24.49?±?6.95MPa) than those with nanohybrid composites (20.41?±?3.70, 22.08?±?6.37, 18.74?±?6.40?MPa) for TER,CSE,SB, respectively (p?<?0.05). There were no significant differences in SBS according to the type of adhesive systems for both repair materials (p?>?0.05). The predominant mode of failure was a mixed type in the restorative material except for the ones repaired with nanohybrid composites using Adper^TMSingle Bond 2. High-viscosity bulk-fill composites could be successfully repaired with the same materials. SBS of repaired bulk-fill composites reached cohesive strength for all tested groups.