The effect of different restoration techniques on fracture strength of teeth with flared roots

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture strength of roots with flared canals. The crowns of 50 extracted single-rooted human teeth were removed and the canals were flared. Five groups were created (n = 10): Group 1: ReforPost (Angelus) was luted using Clearfil SA Cement (Kuraray); Group 2: ReforPost and two accessory posts (Reforpin, Angelus) were luted with Clearfil SA Cement; Group 3: Restored with i-TFC post-core system (Sun Medical); Group 4: The thickness of the root-dentine was increased using composite resin (Clearfil AP-X, Kuraray) and cured with the help of Luminex. ReforPost was then luted; Group 5: Anatomic posts were created by relining ReforPost with Clearfil AP-X and then luted using Clearfil SA Cement. The cores were created with composite resin in all the samples. The crowns of sound teeth were prepared similar to a core (control, n = 10). The specimens were vertically loaded (1 mm/min), the force that was required to fracture each sample was recorded (N) and analyzed (One Way Anova, Tukey tests). No significant difference was found among the groups (p > 0.05). The roots restored by using accessory post and i-TFC post-core (Groups 2 and 3) indicated a 100% favorable fracture pattern. Ten percent of the root fractures were observed in other groups. All techniques saved the root structure and showed 80–100% favorable failure pattern. The use of i-TFC system in flared roots could be an alternative to anatomic, accessory, and prefabricated fiber posts.     

Adhesion of bulk-fill resin composites as core and intraradicular post materials only versus the use of glass-fiber posts in different regions of root dentin

This study assessed adhesion of bulk-fill resin-composites as core and post materials only versus the use of fiber resin composite (FRC) posts. Human teeth (N?=?84) were cut at the CEJ and endodontically treated and randomly divided into seven groups: TP: Titanium post (Flat Head T); SFRC: S2-glass FRC (Pinpost); EFRC1: E-glass FRC (GC Everstick) directly bonded; GFRC: E-glass FRC (Glassix Nordin); EFRC2: E-glass FRC (Everstick); BF1: Bulk-fill resin (Surefill SDR); BF2: Bulk-fill resin (SonicFill). Groups TP, SFRC, EFRC and GFRC were cemented (Panavia 21), while other groups were bonded directly to the intraradicular dentin. The core parts were constructed using a resin composite (G-aenial) except for Groups BF1 and BF2. The core-cervical dentin interface was loaded under shear forces. Push-out tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1?mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey`s tests (α?=?0.05). Not the root level (p?>?0.05) but the type of core and post material significantly affected shear and push-out bond results (p?<?0.001). BF1 (9.2?±?2.1) and BF2 (9.3?±?3.1) showed significantly lower bond strength to the cervical dentin (p?<?0.05) compared to other groups (11.6?±?2.5–19?±?6.8). FRC post types did not show significant difference being higher than those of TP, BF1 and BF2 (0.57?±?0.37–2.34?±?1.98) (p?>?0.05). Partial cohesive core fracture was more common while BF1 and BF2 showed exclusively adhesive failures. Cohesive failure in the cement was frequent in Group TP (53%) compared to other groups (3–24%). BF1 and BF2 presented exclusively complete adhesive failure of the bulk-fill material.     

Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface conditioning on the adhesion of fiber- reinforced composite and zirconia intraradicular posts to the root dentin

This study evaluated the influence of Er,Cr:YSGG laser surface conditioning on push-out bond strength of different root posts to the root dentin. Extracted (N = 27, n = 9 per group) and endodontically treated human mandibular premolars were prepared to receive the posts. Three types of posts, namely quartz fiber (D), glass fiber (S), and zirconium dioxide post (C) were luted with resin cement. The posts were randomly assigned to one of the surface conditioning method: (a) No conditioning, control (L0), (b) Er,Cr:YSGG laser at 175 mJ, 3.5 W for 60 s (L1), and (c) at 225 mJ, 4.5 W for 60 s, with 60 μs pulse duration and repetition rate was 20 Hz (L2) irradiation. Six sections (two coronal, two middle, and two apical) were made in each tooth yielding to 1 mm thick specimens. The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37?°C for 24 h and push-out bond strength (MPa) was tested in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data were analyzed using Kruskall–Wallis and Dunns`s post hoc tests (α = 0.05). In group D, both laser treated groups (L1:16.16 ± 19.89; L2:8.24 ± 9.26) presented significantly less bond strength compared to control group (L0:28.3 ± 16.8) (p < 0.001). Mean push-out bond strength values did not significantly differ according to the root segments (coronal, middle, and apical) (p = 0.106). Application of Er,Cr:YSGG laser, with the parameters tested, did not increase the bond strength of zirconium glass fiber and zirconium oxide posts. Laser surface conditioning decreased the bond strength of quartz fiber posts in the root canal.     

Degree of conversion and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements with phosphonic or phosphoric acid acrylate to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin

This study evaluated the degree of conversion (DC) and adhesion of methacrylate-based resin cements to glass fiber posts at different regions of intraradicular dentin. Single-rooted teeth (N?=?24, n?=?12 per group) were cut at the cement–enamel junction (CEJ), endodontically treated and post space (depth?=?8 mm) was prepared. Teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to the resin cements: (a) Group ML: methacrylate-based cement with phosphonic acid acrylate (Multilink Automix, Ivoclar Vivadent); (b) Group RXU: methacrylate-based cement with phosphoric acid acrylate (RelyX Unicem 2 Automix, 3 M ESPE). Fiber-reinforced composite root posts (RelyX Fiber Post, 3 M ESPE) were cemented according to the manufacturers’ instructions of the resin cements. Root slices of 2-mm thickness (n?=?3 per tooth) were cut below the CEJ 1, 3, and 5 mm apically. The DC of each section was analyzed with micro-Raman spectrometer and push-out test was performed in the Universal Testing Machine (0.5 mm/min). After debonding, all specimens were analyzed using optical microscope to categorize the failure modes. While data (MPa) were statistically evaluated using Kruskal Wallis, Mann–Whitney U tests for DC data 3-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used (α?=?0.05). Regardless of the resin cement type, the mean push-out bond strength results (MPa), were significantly higher for the coronal slices (ML: 9.1?±?2.7; RXU: 7.3?±?4.1) than those of the most apical ones (ML: 7?±?4.9; RXU: 2.89?±?1.5) (p?=?0.002). Resin cement type and (p?p?=?0.002) significantly affected the DC values, while the interaction terms were not significant (p?=?0.606). Overall, DC was significantly higher for ML (67?±?8.2%) than RXU (26?±?8.8%) (p?相似文献   

Influence of the ER,CR:YSGG laser and different irrigation methods on push-out bond strength of fiber post

Er,Cr:YSGG lasers are currently being investigated for disinfecting the root canal treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of various irrigation protocols on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Fifty maxillary anterior teeth were divided into five groups (n = 10) according to the protocol that applied into the post space. Group-1: distilled water, Group-2: 5% NaOCl, Group-3: 2% CHX, Group-4: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.5 W, 20 Hz, 85 air, 75 water, 26.7 J/cm²), Group-5: Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.25 W, 50 Hz, 34 air, 24 water, 12.7 J/cm²). Fiber posts were cemented with resin cement. The remaining part of the root, three slices were obtained from each specimen and push-out test was performed. One-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test at a 5% level of significance were used for the statistical analysis. Post space irradiation with Er,Cr:YSGG laser (1.5 W 20 Hz, 85 air, 75 water, 26.7 J/cm²) increases push-out bond strength of fiber post to root canal dentin. Further investigations are needed to establish and optimize ER,Cr:YSGG laser parameters to increase the push-out bond strength of fiber posts.     

Impact of conditioning regimens and time on adhesion of a fiber post to root dentin using two resin cements

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of irrigation protocols on the bond strength of a glass fiber post bonded to dentin using two resin cements. In 200 root-filled teeth, post space was prepared and divided into five groups (n?=?40) based on the irrigation protocol: group 1 (3% sodium hypochlorite), group 2 (3% sodium hypochlorite – 17% Ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), group 3 (a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and etidronic acid), group 4 (sodium hypochlorite – QMix), and group 5 (distilled water). Samples were subdivided into two subgroups (n?= 10) and fiber posts were cemented using subgroup A (Self-adhesive dual-cure resin cement; SEA) or B (dual-cure resin cement following an etch-and-rinse protocol, ER). Push-out bond strength was performed after 24 h and four months (n?= 10) and failure modes were categorized. Statistical analysis of data was carried out by appropriate analyses (p < 0.05). The irrigation protocol and the resin cement had a significant impact on push-out bond strength. Subgroup A group showed lower bond strength than B at both time periods when 3% NaOCl–17% EDTA and 1:1 mixture of 6% NaOCl + 18%EA protocols were used. Three percent NaOCl used in combination with 17% EDTA or QMix significantly decreased the push-out bond strength of ER at the end of four months (p < 0.05). In conclusion, dual-cure resin cements bonded with etch-and-rinse protocol showed highest bond strength when a mixture of NaOCl and etidronic acid was used as root canal irrigant. These values were differentially influenced by time.     

Test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin: A review

ABSTRACT

In this paper, a review of the test methods for bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin is presented. The main variables that influence the bond strength tests are related to substrate, to specimen properties, specimen preparation, and test methodology. The impact of these variables on the test outcome is analyzed. The search was performed on studies published between 2007 and 2015. Most of the tests carried out, in the literature, were the push-out (75%), pull-out (13%), and microtensile (11.9%) tests, showing an inversion compared to the results found in studies published between 2005 and 2010, when push-out test was used in a proportion of 2% and microtensile test in a proportion of 67%. The push-out test emerged as a practical tool for evaluating the interfacial shear strength between fiber post and root canal walls.     

Effect of intracanal medicaments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine in comparison with Bioaggregate apical plugs

To evaluate the effect of intracanal medicaments on the push-out bond strength of Biodentine in comparison with DiaRoot BioAggregate (BA) when used as apical plugs. Forty single-rooted teeth were prepared using Peeso reamers. The samples were divided into four groups. The intracanal medicaments were applied to the root canals as follows: Group1: a combination of metronidazole–ciprofloxacin–cefaclor, Group2: a combination of metronidazole–ciprofloxacin, Group3: calcium hydroxide, and Group4: no medication. After 21 days, the medicaments were removed. The apical part of each root was horizontally sectioned into 1-mm thick slices. The samples were divided into two subgroups, and the following materials were placed: Biodentine, DiaRoot-BioAggregate. After 48-h incubation, the push-out bond strength was measured. The data were analyzed by a two-way ANOVA. Biodentine showed a significantly higher mean push-out bond strength value than DiaRoot-BioAggregate (P = 0.00). The medications have an effect on the push-out bond strength of both materials (P = 0.002). Biodentine showed better adhesive performance as an apical plug than DiaRoot-BioAggregate.     

The effects of chelation on the adhesion of two different root canal sealers

Objective: This study aims to evaluate alterations in the root canal dentin after irrigation with EDTA, HEBP, and Chitosan in order to determine the push-out bond strengths of the different root canal sealers on altered dentin surfaces. Materials And Methods: Crowns of 70 maxillary single-rooted teeth were removed to obtain a standardized length of 16 mm. The canals were instrumented using rotary files and the step back technique. The master apical file used in this study was #40. The subgroups were determined based on the chelation agent and the material of the root canal sealer that was used (17% EDTA, 18% HEPB, 0.2% Chitosan, Well Root ST (WRST) or AH Plus). Three slices with 1 mm thickness were cut from the root thirds of each tooth and subjected to a push-out test. The data (MPa) were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA and a Duncan’s multiple comparison test at a level of α = 0.05. Finally, scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs were taken. Results: Groups that used WRST exhibited significantly higher push-out bond strength values in all subgroups independent of the irrigant that was used (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Group 1 showed higher push-out bond strength than the other AH Plus subgroups. Conclusion: The EDTA improved the push-out bond strength of the AH Plus. The WRST root canal sealer had the highest push-out bond strength and did not depend on the irrigant used.     

Effect of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strengths of tooth-colored posts to root dentine

Objectives: This study evaluated the effect of different root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength of tooth-colored posts to root dentin. Material and methods: Eighty human mandibular premolar teeth with single roots were decoronated and randomly divided into two groups according to post material: G1–G5: Cytec blanco; G6–G10: Cosmopost. In each group, the specimens were further subgrouped according to the filling material plus sealer (n = 8): G1, G6: Gutta-percha + AH Plus; G2, G7: Resilon + Epiphany SE; G3, G8: Gutta-percha + Sealite; G4, G9: Gutta-percha + iRoot SP; and G5, G10: control (unobturated). Cytec blanco and Cosmopost of 1.4 mm diameter were adhesively luted to samples using Variolink II. Push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine, and failure modes were examined under stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with the two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s tests. Statistical significance was set to 0.05. Results: Roots obturated with AH Plus (3.48 ± 1.41 MPa), Sealite (3.47 ± 0.65 MPa), and Resilon (3.36 ± 1.23 MPa) had the lowest bond strength (p < 0.005). iRoot SP and control group samples showed the highest bond strength values (7.38 ± 0.89 MPa and 6.43 ± 1.16 MPa, respectively) (p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed among tooth-colored posts and sealers (p < 0.05). Adhesive failures were predominant in all groups (48%). Conclusions: When the resin cement Variolink II was used, the types of root canal filling materials and sealers could affect the retentions of the fiber/zirconium posts; the fiber post revealed the higher bond values than the zirconium post; and the calcium silicate-based sealer (iRoot SP) revealed the highest bond strengths.     

Bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite to root canal dentin following cyclic loading*

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading on the bond strength of fiber posts and short fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) to root canal. One hundred single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups according to the material used for luting fiber posts: (1) Resin-core material (Gradia Core, GC Corp.) and (2) Short FRC (EverX Posterior, GC Corp.). Then the specimens were randomly assigned into three sub-groups according to the post material and the groups are indicated as follows: (1) Short FRC (EverX Posterior) used instead of post and core, (2) Fiber post (GC post, GC Corp.) cemented with resin-core (Gradia Core), (3) Fiber post (GC post, GC Corp.) cemented with short FRC (EverX Posterior), (4) Experimental fiber post cemented with resin-core (Gradia Core, GC Corp), (5) Experimental fiber post cemented with short FRC (EverX Posterior). Then the specimens were subdivided into a further two groups in accordance with the storage condition (cyclic loading and 24 h water storage-control group) (n = 10/per group). The micropush-out bond strength between root dentin and posts was measured. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests (α = 0.05). Micropush-out bond strength of the posts to dentin was significantly affected by the type of post material (p < 0.05). However, the load cycling and the resin-based luting agent used had no effect on bond strength values (p = 0.706 and p = 0.346, respectively).     

The Disk-Specimen Thickness Does Not Influence the Push-Out Bond Strength Results Between Fiber Post and Root Dentin

This study evaluated the effect of different thickness of disk-shaped specimens on the push-out bond strength test. Eighteen lower bovine teeth were sectioned (20 mm) and prepared (15 mm) with the same post system drill (Light Post® #1, Schaumburg, IL, Bisco, USA). The apical third of each specimen was embedded in a plastic matrix filled with an acrylic resin (Dencrilay?, Dencril, Sao Paulo, Brazil). The posts were cleaned with alcohol, silanated (ProSil®, FGM, Joenville, SC, Brazil) and cemented with the RelyX? U100 (3 M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Each specimen was sectioned into three pieces of differing thicknesses (1, 2, and 4 mm). These disk-samples were allocated into 3 groups (n = 18) and subjected to push-out testing. One-way ANOVA showed no influence of the specimen thickness on the results (p = 0.842). No correlation was observed between thickness and push-out bond strength (Pearson Correlation, r² = 0.0688; P = 0.6209). The push-out bond strength test was not affected by the thickness of the disk-specimens.     

Microscopic evaluation of the thickness and structure of the cement and cement–dentin interdiffusion zone after luting posts with three different luting cements

Clinical studies report that failures of fiber post cementation occur mainly at the cement–dentin interface. The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the scanning electron microscopic (SEM) evaluations of the cement thicknesses in the root canals and the thickness of cement–dentin interface zones obtained after luting standardized glass-fiber posts with three different types of luting cements. Thirty single-rooted mandibular premolars of similar sizes were prepared for post insertion after biomechanical preparation and obturation. They were divided into three groups containing 10 samples each. Standardized glass-fiber posts were cemented with zinc phosphate cement for ZNP group, with conventional adhesive resin cement for CAR group, and with self-adhesive resin cement for SAR group. The formation and thickness of cement and cement–dentin interface zone were evaluated by stereomicroscope and SEM using ×800 magnification, and the data were analyzed. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of cement thickness (p = 0.835); however, there were significant differences among the cement layer thicknesses measured at the three examined levels of the root canals (p = 0.000). The groups using conventional adhesive resin cement presented longer micromechanical interlocking while the groups using self-adhesive resin cement showed wide gaps and zinc phosphate cement showed no bonding between cement–dentin interdiffusion zones along the root canal. As a clinical consequence, the use of zinc phosphate cement may not provide strong bond between dentin–cement interface. Conventional adhesive resin cements showed reliable bond to dentin when compared to zinc phosphate and self-adhesive resin cement.     

The effect of combined use of chitosan and PIPS on push-out bond strength of root canal filling materials

Adhesion of root canal filling materials to root dentin is important for the long-term success of the treatment. Push-out bond strength test is used to evaluate the adhesion capacity of root canal filling materials to root canal walls. The aim of the present study is to compare the bond strength of root canal filling materials to root dentin after irrigation with EDTA, chitosan and the combination of chitosan and PIPS irridation using push-out bond strength test. Forty-eight extracted teeth were resected until 13-mm long roots were obtained. Root canals were prepared with a size-25 OneShape instrument. Samples were divided into three groups each including 15 roots. Group 1: Canals were rinsed with 0.2% chitosan and subjected to laser irridation with PIPS at the same time. Group 2: Canals were rinsed with 0.2% chitosan. Group 3: Canals were rinsed with EDTA. All canals were filled with .06 tapered gutta-percha and AH-plus sealer. One-mm thick slices were taken from coronal, middle and apical one-thirds of the roots. Push-out bond strength was determined using a Universal Testing Machine. One root from each group was observed under SEM to evaluate the degree of smear removal. Statistical analysis was performed with Kruskall-Wallis test. Results showed that bond strength values were statistically similar in overall evaluation for all groups (p > .05). In segmental evaluation, group 1 revealed the highest bond strength in apical one-third compared to other groups (p < .05).     

Effect of the frequency of mechanical pulses for fatigue aging testing on push-out bond strength between glass fiber posts and root dentin

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the frequency of mechanical pulses during mechanical fatigue aging on bond strength between glass fiber posts and root dentin. Fiber posts were adhesively cemented in 30 bovine roots and the core was built up with composite. All specimens were subjected to mechanical cycling (45° angle; 37 °C; 50 N; 2×10⁶ pulses) at different frequencies: 2, 4, and 8 Hz. After the fatigue, each specimen was submitted to push out test. The bond strength was calculated for data analysis (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.05). The frequency did not affect the push-out (p = 0.7). The main failure mode was between dentin and cement in all groups. The mechanical pulses were not influenced by the bond strength between root dentin and fiber posts. Thus, it is possible to decrease the time-consuming in vitro tests involving posts without damaging the reliability of the test.     

Effect of calcium hydroxide removal techniques on the bond strength of root canal sealers

To evaluate the influence of calcium-hydroxide(CH) with different vehicles on the push-out bond strength of different canal sealers to radicular dentin. 152 decrowned single-rooted human teeth were used. After preparation of root canals with nickel-titanium rotary files, 8 roots served as control groups. Then, the roots were divided as follows: (1) Calasept and (2) Surepaste (n = 72). Roots were further subgrouped according to the CH removal techniques: (1) %17 ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) + rotary file, (2) %17EDTA + hand file, and (3) %17EDTA (n = 24). Eight roots from each group sectioned longitudinally, divided into two pairs and photographed by stereomicroscope (n = 16). The remaining 16 roots in CH intracanal dressing groups were further divided into 2 subgroups according to the sealer used: (1) AH-Plus-jet and (2) Apexit-Plus (n = 8). Bond strengths of the root canal sealers to root canal dentin were measured using a push-out test setup. The data were statistically analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance p = 0.05. The push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by type of vehicle and the removal techniques (p < 0.05). The mean bond strength of AH-Plus-jet was significantly higher than Apexit-Plus, regardless of type of vehicle and the removal techniques (p < 0.05). There was no difference between vehicles on CH removal (p > 0.05). When examining the removal techniques, only irrigation with %17 EDTA left significantly larger amount of residue (p < 0.05). AH-Plus-jet showed better dislocation resistance than Apexit-Plus. Type of vehicle does not play a fundamental role in the degree of persistence of CH residues on the dentin walls. Instrumentation improves the removal efficiency of CH from root canal.     

Influence of glass fiber post translucency on microhardness and dentin bond strength of resin cement at different root levels

The aims of this study were (a) to evaluate the influence of glass fiber post translucency on the hardness of a light-cure resin cement within the root canal; (b) to assess dentin bond strength at different root levels. Fifty human canine roots were randomly divided into five groups. Translucent posts (Exacto, Angelus; White Post DC, FGM; FRC Postec Plus, Ivoclar Vivadent) were used in three groups, opaque posts (Exacto Opaco, Angelus) were used in one group and no posts were used in the last group. The posts were cemented using a light-cure resin cement (Variolink N Base, Ivoclar Vivadent). The roots were cross-sectioned into slices (two from the cervical, two from the middle, and two from the apical thirds) which were then submitted to microhardness and push-out tests. Two-way analysis of variance and Tukey test were performed. Cement microhardness was significantly higher in the translucent post groups when compared to opaque posts and no post. At the apical third, the White Post DC and FRC Postec groups showed higher microhardness values than those in the Exacto Translucido group. The type of glass fiber post did not significantly influence bond strength values. White Post DC and FRC Postec Plus provided higher resin cement microhardness values, especially at the most apical thirds. Bond strength was not dependent on the type of post used. Failure mode analysis suggested superior cement curing when the translucent posts were used.     

Effects of mixing techniques and dentin moisture conditions on push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine

Objective: To evaluate the influence of manual and mechanical mixing techniques as well as the effects of moisture on the push-out bond strength of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, USA) and Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France) to radicular dentin.

Material and methods: Two hundred and forty dentin discs were assigned into three groups with respect to the moisture condition tested: (1) dry, (2) paper points, (3) wet. The discs were further divided into four subgroups according to the calcium silicate cements (CSCs) and mixing techniques used: (1) ProRoot MTA mixed manually, (2) ProRoot MTA mixed mechanically, (3) Biodentine mixed manually, and (4) Biodentine mixed mechanically. Bond strengths of the cements to root canal dentin were measured using a push-out test setup. The data were statistically analyzed using three-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post hoc test p = 0.05.

Results: The data indicated that the push-out bond strength values were significantly affected by CSCs, mixing techniques, and moisture conditions (p < 0.001). Dry conditions caused a significant decrease in bond strength values for both CSCs (p < 0.001). The mean bond strength of Biodentine was significantly higher than that of ProRoot MTA, regardless of the mixing techniques and moisture conditions (p < 0.001). Mechanical mixing favored bond strength values statistically compared to manual mixing (p < .001).

Conclusion: The mixing techniques and moisture conditions have an effect on the push-out bond strengths of ProRoot MTA and Biodentine. Dry samples and manual mixing of cements deteriorate the push-out bond strengths values.     

The effect of intracanal placement of various medicaments on the bond strength of three calcium silicate-based cements to root canal dentin

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of intracanal placement of various medicaments on the bond strength of ProRooT MTA, Biodentine, and Endosequence root repair material (ERRM) putty. Ninety extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were decoronated and instrumented using Protaper Next rotary system and #1 to #6 Peeso reamers. The prepared teeth were randomly divided into six groups according to the intracanal medicaments: Group 1: double antibiotic paste (DAP) consisting of metronidazole and ciprofloxacin; Group 2: Triple antibiotic paste (TAP) with cefaclor; Group 3: TAPwith clindamycin; Group 4: amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (Augmentin®); Group 5: calcium hydroxide (CH); Group 6: control (no medicament) (n = 15). Parallel transverse sections were obtained in the coronal to the apical direction (4 slices/ tooth) and were divided into three subgroups according to the cements: Group A: ProRoot MTA; Group B: Biodentine; Group C: ERRM (n = 20 slices/subgroup). A push-out test was used to measure bond strength. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc test. The bond strength was significantly lower for DAP and TAPs than for Augmentin®, CH, or the control (p < 0.05). Biodentine and ERRM had significantly higher bond strength values than ProRooT MTA (p < 0.05) regardless of the intracanal medicaments tested, while no significant difference existed between Biodentine and ERRM (p > 0.05). While the application of DAP or TAPs decreased the bond strength, application of CH or Augmentin® did not. ERRM and Biodentine had higher bond strength values than ProRoot MTA.     

Push-out bonding strengths of four different dowel systems luted with two different adhesive systems

This in vitro study investigates the bonding capacity of resin cements to dowels, using the push-out bonding strength of four different dowel systems, namely, stainless steel dowels (SSD), resin-supported polyethylene fiber dowels (RSPFD), zirconia dowels (ZD), and superpost glass fiber dowels (GFD), luted in root canals, using two different resin cements, namely, Multilink Automix Cement and Clearfil Esthetic Cement. Ninety-six maxillary central incisor teeth were sectioned below the cementoenamel junction, and the roots were treated endodontically. Then the roots were placed into four groups, based on the dowel systems used. The roots were further placed into two subgroups, based on the cement type used as subgroup A and subgroup B. Push-out bonding tests were performed on the bonded specimens, which were cut into 1 mm thick sections. A two-way ANOVA test and Tukey’s HSD tests were performed. The push-out bonding strength values for SSD, ZD, and RSPFD were not significantly different (p > 0.05). The means for GFD were significantly higher than the means for ZD (p < 0.05) when Multilink Automix Cement was used. However, when Clearfil Esthetic Cement was used, the means for RSPFD were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the means for the other systems. When Clearfil Esthetic Cement was used, the RSPF dowel system provided significantly higher bonding strength values than the other systems.