Biomass gasification opportunities in a district heating system

This paper evaluates the economic effects and the potential for reduced CO₂ emissions when biomass gasification applications are introduced in a Swedish district heating (DH) system. The gasification applications included in the study deliver heat to the DH network while producing renewable electricity or biofuels. Gasification applications included are: external superheater for steam from waste incineration (waste boost, WB), gas engine CHP (BIGGE), combined cycle CHP (BIGCC) and production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) for use as transportation fuel. Six scenarios are used, employing two time perspectives – short-term and medium-term – and differing in economic input data, investment options and technical system. To evaluate the economic performance an optimisation model is used to identify the most profitable alternatives regarding investments and plant operation while meeting the DH demand. This study shows that introducing biomass gasification in the DH system will lead to economic benefits for the DH supplier as well as reduce global CO₂ emissions. Biomass gasification significantly increases the potential for production of high value products (electricity or SNG) in the DH system. However, which form of investment that is most profitable is shown to be highly dependent on the level of policy instruments for biofuels and renewable electricity. Biomass gasification applications can thus be interesting for DH suppliers in the future, and may be a vital measure to reach the 2020 targets for greenhouse gases and renewable energy, given continued technology development and long-term policy instruments.     

Main routes for the thermo-conversion of biomass into fuels and chemicals. Part 2: Gasification systems

Gasification as a thermo-chemical process is defined and limited to combustion and pyrolysis. The gasification of biomass is a thermal treatment, which results in a high production of gaseous products and small quantities of char and ash. The solid phase usually presents a carbon content higher than 76%, which makes it possible to use it directly for industrial purposes. The gaseous products can be burned to generate heat or electricity, or they can potentially be used in the synthesis of liquid transportation fuels, H₂, or chemicals. On the other hand, the liquid phase can be used as fuel in boilers, gas turbines or diesel engines, both for heat or electric power generation. However, the main purpose of biomass gasification is the production of low- or medium heating value gas which can be used as fuel gas in an internal combustion engine for power production. In addition to limiting applications and often compounding environmental problems, these technologies are an inefficient source of usable energy.     

Mechanisms of Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes. Part 2: Reactions of Gasification

Abstract

Gasification as a thermochemical process is defined and limited to combustion and pyrolysis. The gasification of biomass is a thermal treatment which results in a high proportion of gaseous products and small quantities of char (solid product) and ash. Biomass gasification technologies have historically been based upon partial oxidation or partial combustion principles, resulting in the production of a hot, dirty, low Btu gas that must be directly ducted into boilers or dryers. In addition to limiting applications and often compounding environmental problems, these technologies are an inefficient source of usable energy. The main objective of the present study is to investigate gasification mechanisms of biomass structural constituents. Complete gasification of biomass involves several sequential and parallel reactions. Most of these reactions are endothermic and must be balanced by partial combustion of gas or an external heat source.     

Performance of large‐scale biomass gasifiers in a biorefinery,a state‐of‐the‐art reference

The Gothenburg Biomass Gasification plant (2015) is currently the largest plant in the world producing biomethane (20 MW_biomethane) from woody biomass. We present the experimental data from the first measurement campaign and evaluate the mass and energy balances of the gasification sections at the plant. Measures improving the efficiency including the use of additives (potassium and sulfur), high‐temperature pre‐heating of the inlet streams, improved insulation of the reactors, drying of the biomass and introduction of electricity as a heat source (power‐to‐gas) are investigated with simulations. The cold gas efficiency was calculated in 71.7%LHV_daf using dried biomass (8% moist). The gasifier reaches high fuel conversion, with char gasification of 54%, and the fraction of the volatiles is converted to methane of 34%_mass. Because of the design, the heat losses are significant (5.2%LHV_daf), which affect the efficiency. The combination of potential improvements can increase the cold gas efficiency to 83.5%LHV_daf, which is technically feasible in a commercial plant. The experience gained from the Gothenburg Biomass Gasification plant reveals the strong potential biomass gasification at large scale. © 2017 The Authors. International Journal of Energy Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.     

Biomass gasification for sustainable energy production: A review

Gasification process is considered as one of the best routes of energy recovery from biomass by producing syngas mostly including H₂, CO, and CH₄. Biomass as the main renewable energy resources has great advantages regarding its diversity, availability, and sustainability for supplying energy needs in heat, electricity production, biofuel production for transportation, etc. Various gasifiers based on the gasifying process and agents have been examined. This paper reviewed the theory of biomass gasification by comparing and analyzing different gasification models-designs and configurations, also different operational conditions. It aimed to bring a holistic approach for hydrogen rich syngas production based on the present technologies, techno-economic analysis, and industrial/commercialization pathways. The biomass gasification technologies need to be improved for hydrogen production regarding the global environmental and economic issues. The review provided better insights into the enhancement of syngas production from biomass.     

Hydrogen Production from Carbonaceous Solid Wastes by Steam Reforming

Abstract

In this study, gas and liquid fuels from biomass by steam reforming were investigated. The steam reforming process provides the opportunity to convert renewable biomass materials into clean fuel gases or synthesis gases. Synthesis gas includes mainly hydrogen and carbon monoxide which is also called as syngas (H₂ + CO). Bio-syngas is a gas rich in CO and H₂ obtained by gasification of biomass. The aim of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) is synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons from CO and H₂ gas mixture. The products from FTS are mainly aliphatic straight-chain hydrocarbons (C_xH_y). The distribution of the products depends on the catalyst and the process parameters such as temperature, pressure, and residence time. Typical operation conditions for the FTS are a temperature range of 475–625 K and pressures of 15–40 bar, depending on the process.     

Modular biomass gasification-based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) for sustainable development

The integration of biomass gasification with SOFCs offers the potential of highly efficient and renewable power generation, primarily in modular solutions. SOFC seems to be the most promising fuel cell technology of biomass gasifier producer gases. Solid oxide fuel cells, because of their high operating temperature, do not require pure hydrogen as fuel, exhibiting high fuel flexibility. Sufficient amounts of cereal, cotton, corn, olive, coffee or palm tree residues are available in Mediterranean areas, while the climatic conditions are favorable for energy crops cultivations. Their residues can be utilized for electricity production by modular biomass gasification-based solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC).     

SOLAR THERMOCHEMICAL CONVERSION OF BIOMASS

The purpose of this paper is first to briefly describe the usual routes of biomass thermochemical conversion and then to discuss the possibility of using concentrated solar energy to provide the necessary heat for the processes. Gasification, fast and slow pyrolysis are more particularly described. They can be carried out for the preparation of a vast range of possible products that can be used as energy carriers and/or as a source of chemical commodities. The gasification processes are intended for the preparation of gas mixtures (CO, H₂, etc.) for chemical synthesis, heat or electricity generation. The fast pyrolysis formerly carried out for gas production (CO, H₂, light hydrocarbons, etc.) is now mainly studied with the objective to produce liquids (bio-oils). Slow pyrolysis is in use for a long time for the preparation of solids (charcoal). The nature and quality of the products depend mainly on the experimental conditions of the process (temperature, heating rates, residence times, etc.). The possibility of a solar entry in the gasification and pyrolysis processes is then discussed. The technical and scientific benefits, as well as the difficulties, are underlined, showing the necessity to design new types of specific reactors. From a fundamental point of view the advantages are also underlined of using a concentrated radiation as a laboratory tool for studying the very fast primary steps of biomass thermal decomposition as well as the possible existence of intermediate short life time species that are still not well known.     

Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste

Four technologies are investigated which produce energy from municipal solid waste (MSW): incineration, gasification, generation of biogas and utilisation in a combined heat and power (CHP) plant, generation of biogas and conversion to transport fuel.Typically the residual component of MSW (non-recyclable, non-organic) is incinerated producing electricity at an efficiency of about 20% and thermal product at an efficiency of about 55%. This is problematic in an Irish context where utilisation of thermal products is not the norm. Gasification produces electricity at an efficiency of about 34%; this would suggest that gasification of the residual component of MSW is more advantageous than incineration where a market for thermal product does not exist. Gasification produces more electricity than incineration, requires a smaller gate fee than incineration and when thermal product is not utilised generates less greenhouse gas per kWh than incineration. Gasification of MSW (a non-homogenous fuel) is, however, not proven at commercial scale.Biogas may be generated by digesting the organic fraction of MSW (OFMSW). The produced biogas may be utilised for CHP production or for transport fuel production as CH₄-enriched biogas. When used to produce transport fuel some of the biogas is used in a small CHP unit to meet electricity demand on site. This generates a surplus thermal product.Both biogas technologies require significantly less investment costs than the thermal conversion technologies (incineration and gasification) and have smaller gate fees. Of the four technologies investigated transport fuel production requires the least gate fee. A shortfall of the transport fuel production technology is that only 50% of biogas is available for scrubbing to CH₄-enriched biogas.     

生物质加压气化技术的研究与应用现状

生物质气化气可以替代化石燃料用于发电、供热和用于生产合成反应的化工原料,解决日益严重的能源短缺和环境污染等问题.加压气化具有生产能力大、效率高,可降低单位投资成本,减少焦油的产生,有利于后续发电及合成工艺等诸多优点.文章介绍了压力对气化的影响,加压气化存在的主要问题,加压在生物质和劣质煤等联合气化、定向气化制备合成气、IGCC上应用的研究和应用现状.     

High quality product gas from biomass steam gasification combined with torrefaction and carbon dioxide capture processes

Gasification is currently recognized as a mature technology to convert biomass into useful and versatile product gas for further energy and fuel applications. However, there are some remaining problems relating to the process operation and process efficiency due to inherent properties of biomass feedstock such as high moisture content, low energy density and high oxygen content. Strategies to improve the efficiency of biomass gasification as well as the quality of product gas are thus required. For this purpose, a combined process of torrefaction, gasification, and carbon dioxide capture is developed and simulated in a commercial simulator to investigate the performance of a biomass gasification coupled with a pre-treatment and a post-treatment processes. The results show that the quality of product gas is enhanced when combining gasification with a torrefaction and a CO₂ capture processes. The heating value of the product gas and the cold gas efficiency are both increased with additional torrefaction. The CO₂ capture process using monoethanolamine offers a CO₂ removal efficiency of about 83% and consequently increase the product gas heating value up to 27%.     

生物质气化过程的混合神经网络模拟

用几种生物质的料进行了水蒸汽流化条件下的常压气化实验。为得到各种生物质的气化特性,用混合神经网络模型于气化过程进行了模拟。模型得到的气化产率与实验数据吻合得较好。神经网络给出的气化特性能正确地反映实际的生物质气化过程。模拟结果还显示,草本生物质和木本生物质在气化过程中,各种煤气成分的释放有不同的规律。     

Lime enhanced biomass gasification. Energy penalty reduction by solids preheating in the calciner

Hydrogen is expected to be one of the most important energy carriers in the future. Gasification process may be used to produce hydrogen when joined with carbon capture technologies. Furthermore, the combination of biomass gasification and carbon capture presents a significant technical potential in net negative greenhouse gas emissions. Lime enhanced biomass gasification process makes use of CaO as a high temperature CO₂ carrier between the steam biomass gasifier and an oxy-fired regenerator. Important energy penalties derive from the temperature difference between the reactors (around 250–300 °C). A cyclonic preheater similar to those used in the cement industry may improve the energetic efficiency of the process if the particles entering the regenerator reactor are heated up by the gas leaving this reactor. A lime enhanced biomass gasification system was modelled and simulated. A cyclonic preheater was included to evaluate the improvement. Results show an increase of the gasification chemical efficiency and a reduction of the energy consumption in the regenerator.     

Implications of system expansion for the assessment of well‐to‐wheel CO2 emissions from biomass‐based transportation

In this paper we show the effects of expanding the system when evaluating well‐to‐wheel (WTW) CO₂ emissions for biomass‐based transportation, to include the systems surrounding the biomass conversion system. Four different cases are considered: DME via black liquor gasification (BLG), methanol via gasification of solid biomass, lignocellulosic ethanol and electricity from a biomass integrated gasification combined cycle (BIGCC) used in a battery‐powered electric vehicle (BPEV). All four cases are considered with as well as without carbon capture and storage (CCS). System expansion is used consistently for all flows. The results are compared with results from a conventional WTW study that only uses system expansion for certain co‐product flows. It is shown that when expanding the system, biomass‐based transportation does not necessarily contribute to decreased CO₂ emissions and the results from this study in general indicate considerably lower CO₂ mitigation potential than do the results from the conventional study used for comparison. It is shown that of particular importance are assumptions regarding future biomass use, as by expanding the system, future competition for biomass feedstock can be taken into account by assuming an alternative biomass usage. Assumptions regarding other surrounding systems, such as the transportation and the electricity systems are also shown to be of significance. Of the four studied cases without CCS, BIGCC with the electricity used in a BPEV is the only case that consistently shows a potential for CO₂ reduction when alternative use of biomass is considered. Inclusion of CCS is not a guarantee for achieving CO₂ reduction, and in general the system effects are equivalent or larger than the effects of CCS. DME from BLG generally shows the highest CO₂ emission reduction potential for the biofuel cases. However, neither of these options for biomass‐based transportation can alone meet the needs of the transport sector. Therefore, a broader palette of solutions, including different production routes, different fuels and possibly also CCS, will be needed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Biomass gasification in district heating systems – The effect of economic energy policies

Biomass gasification is considered a key technology in reaching targets for renewable energy and CO₂ emissions reduction. This study evaluates policy instruments affecting the profitability of biomass gasification applications integrated in a Swedish district heating (DH) system for the medium-term future (around year 2025). Two polygeneration applications based on gasification technology are considered in this paper: (1) a biorefinery plant co-producing synthetic natural gas (SNG) and district heat; (2) a combined heat and power (CHP) plant using integrated gasification combined cycle technology. Using an optimisation model we identify the levels of policy support, here assumed to be in the form of tradable certificates, required to make biofuel production competitive to biomass based electricity generation under various energy market conditions. Similarly, the tradable green electricity certificate levels necessary to make gasification based electricity generation competitive to conventional steam cycle technology, are identified. The results show that in order for investment in the SNG biorefinery to be competitive to investment in electricity production in the DH system, biofuel certificates in the range of 24–42 EUR/MWh are needed. Electricity certificates are not a prerequisite for investment in gasification based CHP to be competitive to investment in conventional steam cycle CHP, given sufficiently high electricity prices. While the required biofuel policy support is relatively insensitive to variations in capital cost, the required electricity certificates show high sensitivity to variations in investment costs. It is concluded that the large capital commitment and strong dependency on policy instruments makes it necessary that DH suppliers believe in the long-sightedness of future support policies, in order for investments in large-scale biomass gasification in DH systems to be realised.     

New concepts in biomass gasification

Gasification is considered as a key technology for the use of biomass. In order to promote this technology in the future, advanced, cost-effective, and highly efficient gasification processes and systems are required. This paper provides a detailed review on new concepts in biomass gasification.Concepts for process integration and combination aim to enable higher process efficiencies, better gas quality and purity, and lower investment costs. The recently developed UNIQUE gasifier which integrates gasification, gas cleaning and conditioning in one reactor unit is an example for a promising process integration. Other interesting concepts combine pyrolysis and gasification or gasification and combustion in single controlled stages. An approach to improve the economic viability and sustainability of the utilization of biomass via gasification is the combined production of more than one product. Polygeneration strategies for the production of multiple energy products from biomass gasification syngas offer high efficiency and flexibility.     

Utilization of Coal as a Source of Chemicals

Abstract

Coal consists carbon-based substances can be used as a source of specialty aromatic chemicals and aliphatic chemicals. Four widespread processes allow for making chemicals from coals: gasification, liquefaction, direct conversion, and co-production of chemicals and fuels along with electricity. Coal is gasified to produce synthesis gas (syngas) with a gasifier which is then converted to parafinic liquid fuels and chemicals by Fischer-Trops synthesis. Liquid product from coal gasification mainly contains benzene, toluene, xylene (BTX), phenols, alkylphenols, and cresol. Methanol is made using coal or syngas with hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a 2 to 1 ratio. Coal-derived methanol has many preferable properties as it is free of sulfur and other impurities. Syngas from coal can be reformed to hydrogen. Ammonium sulfate from coal tar by pyrolysis can be converted to ammonia. The humus substances can be recovered from brown coal by alkali extraction.     

Economic implications of pre- and post-combustion calcium looping configurations applied to gasification power plants

Gasification is a promising conversion technology to deliver high energy efficiency simultaneously with low energy and cost penalties for carbon capture. This paper is devoted to in-depth economic evaluations of pre- and post-combustion Calcium Looping (CaL) configurations for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants. The poly-generation capability, e.g. hydrogen and power co-generation, is also discussed. The post-combustion CaL option is a gasification power plant in which the flue gases from the gas turbine are treated for CO₂ capture in a carbonation–calcination cycle. In pre-combustion CaL option, the Sorbent Enhanced Water Gas Shift (SEWGS) feature is used to produce hydrogen which is used for power generation. As benchmark case, a conventional gasification power plant without carbon capture was considered. Net power output of evaluated cases is in the range of 550–600 MW with more than 95% carbon capture rate. The pre-combustion capture configuration was evaluated also in hydrogen and power co-generation scenario. The evaluations are concentrated for estimation of capital costs, specific investment cost, operational & maintenance (O&M) costs, CO₂ removal and avoidance costs, electricity costs, sensitivity analysis of technical and economic assumptions on key economic indicators etc.     

Gasification of torrefied oil palm biomass in a fixed-bed reactor: Effects of gasifying agents on product characteristics

Gasification represents an attractive pathway to generate fuel gas (i.e., syngas (H₂ and CO) and hydrocarbons) from oil palm biomass in Malaysia. Torrefaction is introduced here to enhance the oil palm biomass properties prior to gasification. In this work, the effect of torrefaction on the gasification of three oil palm biomass, i.e., empty fruit bunches (EFB), mesocarp fibres (MF), and palm kernel shells (PKS) are evaluated. Two gasifying agents were used, i.e., CO₂ and steam. The syngas lower heating values (LHV_syngas) for CO₂ gasification and steam gasification were in the range of 0.35–1.67 MJ m⁻³ and 1.61–2.22 MJ m⁻³, respectively. Compared with EFB and MF, PKS is more effective for fuel gas production as indicated by the more dominant emission of light hydrocarbons (CH₄, C₂H₄, and C₂H₆) in PKS case. Gasification efficiency was examined using carbon conversion efficiency (CCE) and cold gas efficiency (CGE). CCE ranges between 4% and 55.1% for CO₂ gasification while CGE varies between 4.8% and 46.2% and 27.6% and 62.9% for CO₂ gasification and steam gasification, respectively. Our results showed that higher concentration of gasifying agent promotes higher carbon conversion and that steam gasification provides higher thermal efficiency (CGE) compared to CO₂ gasification.     

Numerical modeling of the gasification based biomass co-firing in a 600 MW pulverized coal boiler

Gasification based biomass co-firing was an attractive technology for biomass utilization. Compared to directly co-firing of biomass and coal, it might: (1) avoid feeding biomass into boiler, (2) reduce boiler fouling and corrosion problem, and (3) avoid altering ash characteristics. In this paper, CFD modeling of product gas (from biomass gasification) and coal co-firing in a 600 MW tangential PC boiler was carried out. The results showed that NO_x emission was reduced about 50–70% when the product gas was injected through the lowest layer burner. The fouling problem can be reduced with furnace temperature decreasing for co-firing case. The convection heat transfer area should be increased or the co-firing ratio of product gas should be decreased to keep boiler rated capacity.