Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux on hemoglobin cycling in hemodialysis patients

Many studies found that hemoglobin (Hb) fluctuation was closely related to the prognosis of the maintenance hemodialysis patients. We investigated the association of factors relating dialysis dose and dialyzer membrane with Hb levels. We undertook a randomized clinical trial in 140 patients undergoing thrice‐weekly dialysis and assigned patients randomly to a standard or high dose of dialysis; Hb level was measured every month for 12 months. In the standard‐dose group, the mean (±SD) urea reduction ratio was 65.1% ± 7.3%, the single‐pool Kt/V was 1.26 ± 0.11, and the equilibrated Kt/V was 1.05 ± 0.09; in the high‐dose group, the values were 73.5% ± 8.7%, 1.68 ± 0.15, and 1.47 ± 0.11, respectively. The standard deviation (SD) and residual SD (liner regression of Hb) values of Hb were significantly higher in the standard‐dose group and low‐flux group. The percentage achievement of target Hb in the high‐dose dialysis group and high‐flux dialyzer group was significantly higher than the standard‐dose group and low‐flux group, respectively. Patients undergoing hemodialysis thrice weekly appear to have benefit from a higher dialysis dose than that recommended by current KDQQI (Kidney Disease Qutcome Quality Initiative) guidelines or from the use of a high‐flux membrane, which is in favor of maintaining stable Hb levels.     

Comparison of urea clearance in low‐efficiency low‐flux vs. high‐efficiency high‐flux dialyzer membrane with reduced blood and dialysate flow: An in vitro analysis

Rapid removal of small molecules during hemodialysis places an acutely ill patient with kidney failure at an increased risk of hemodynamic instability and for dialysis disequilibrium syndrome. The use of high‐flux, high‐efficiency (HEF) dialyzers may increase this risk despite reductions in blood and dialysate flow. We performed in vitro experiments to compare urea clearance at low dialysate flow and various blood flows using a low‐efficiency low‐flux (LEF) and a HEF membrane. Compared to LEF, there was a significant increase in the clearance of urea at all blood flows with the HEF (all P values < 0.005). HEF dialyzer (F180NR) had higher urea clearance at a blood flow of 150 mL/min than LEF dialyzer (F5) at blood flow of 300 mL/min (144.1 ± 0.99 vs. 130.1 ± 0.001 mL/min for F180 vs. F5, respectively, P < 0.002). Our data suggest that use of HEF dialyzer are not as safe as LEF in high‐risk acute dialysis patients since these are associated with more rapid removal of urea despite reduction in blood and dialysate flow as compared to LEF.     

Phosphorus Clearance Using Two Hemodialyzers Placed in Parallel

Control of hyperphosphatemia is a major goal in patients with end‐stage renal disease. However, removal of retained inorganic phosphorus during hemodialysis remains a major problem. We compared clearances and total phosphate removal in large patients treated with two F‐80 dialyzers (Fresenius Medical Care of North America, Lexington, MA, U.S.A.) placed in parallel, and small patients dialyzed with a single F‐80 dialyzer (SD). Clearances were obtained using total dialysate collections. Eight dialysate collections (5 patients) using double parallel dialyzers (DD group) were compared with 5 dialysate collections (4 patients) using single dialyzers (SD group). Blood and dialysate flow rates and time of dialysis treatment were identical between the groups. The DD group's Kt/V _urea was 1.46 ± 0.13; SD group's Kt/V _urea was 1.35 ± 0.09 (p = 0.2). Absolute phosphorus removal was 1594 ± 300 mg for the DD group, compared to 1108 ± 285 mg in the SD group (p = 0.03). Urea clearance in the DD group was 285 ± 25 mL/minute and 251 ± 27 mL/ min in the SD group (p = 0.082). Phosphorus clearance was 178 ± 32 mL/min in the DD group and 149 ± 38 mL/min in the SD group (p = 0.039). There was no correlation between phosphorus clearance and dialyzer reuse. The bulk of phosphorus removal was achieved during the first 2 hours of hemodialysis. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that there are at least two pools of body phosphorus. Using hemodialyzers placed in parallel led to higher phosphate clearance and total phosphorus removal. This higher phosphate removal may be related in part to increasing the concentration gradient for transfer out of a second compartment.     

Phosphate removal model: an observational study of low-flux dialyzers in conventional hemodialysis therapy

Precise assessing phosphate removal by hemodialysis (HD) is important to improve phosphate control in patients on maintenance HD. We reported a simple noninvasive model to estimate phosphate removal within a 4‐hour HD. One hundred sixty‐five patients who underwent HD 4 hours per session using low‐flux dialyzers made of polysulfone (1.2 m²) or triacetate (1.3 m²) were enrolled. Blood flows varied from 180 to 300 mL/min. Effluent dialysate samples were collected during the 4‐hour HD treatment to measure the total phosphate removal. Predialysis levels of serum phosphate, potassium, hematocrit, intact parathyroid hormone, total carbon dioxide (TCO₂), alkaline phosphatase, clinical and dialysis characteristics were obtained. One hundred thirty‐five observations were randomly selected for model building and the remaining 30 for model validation. Total amount of phosphate removal within the 4‐hour HD was mostly 15–30 mmol. A primary model (model 1) predicting total phosphate removal was Tpo₄ = 79.6 × C₄₅ (mmol/L) ? 0.023 × age (years) + 0.065 × weight (kg) ? 0.12 × TCO₂ (mmol/L) + 0.05 × clearance (mL/min) ? 3.44, where C₄₅ was phosphate concentration in spent dialysate measured at the 45 minute of HD and clearance was phosphate clearance of dialyzer in vitro conditions offered by manufacturer's data sheet. Since the parameter TCO₂ needed serum sample for measurement, we further derived a noninvasive model (model 2):Tpo₄ = 80.3 × C₄₅ ? 0.024 × age + 0.07 × weight + 0.06 × clearance ? 8.14. Coefficient of determination, root mean square error, and residual plots showed the appropriateness of two models. Model validation further suggested good and similar predictive ability of them. This study derived a noninvasive model to predict phosphate removal. It applies to patients treated by 4‐hour HD under similar conditions.     

Enhanced solute removal with intermittent, in-center, 8-hour nocturnal hemodialysis

Advances in the dialysis technique and increasing urea Kt/V have not improved outcomes for end‐stage renal disease patients maintained on hemodialysis (HD) therapy. Attention has, thus, focused on enhancing solute removal via prolonged HD sessions. A reduction in the serum levels of phosphorus and β‐2‐microglobulin (B2M) with longer HD treatments has been linked to improved patient outcomes. We have shown that serum phosphorus levels are significantly lowered in patients maintained on thrice‐weekly, in‐center, 8‐hour nocturnal HD performed at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min. The kinetics of this modality were examined. A total of 8 patients participated in the study (age 45±7 years). Serum creatinine levels decreased from 9.2±1.9 to 3.0±1.0 mg/dL at 8 hours while serum phosphorus decreased from 5.7±1.9 to 2.5±0.7 mg/dL at 8 hours. The initial decrease from predialysis values to 1 hour after the start of HD was significant for both creatinine (P<0.0001) and phosphorus (P<0.001). Serum B2M decreased from 26.8±5.5 mg/L predialysis to 14.9±7.0 mg/L at 8 hours (P<0.01). Dialysate‐side clearances of phosphorus and creatinine were 136±13 and 143±27 cm³/min, respectively. Phosphorus clearances were steadily maintained during the 8‐hour session. A total of 904±292 mg of phosphorus was removed during the 8‐hour treatment, with 501±174 mg (55%) removed during the first 4 hours and the remaining 45% continuously removed during the latter one‐half of the session. The overall calculated B2M clearance was 55.1±40.3 cm³/min using the immediate post‐B2M value and 28.4±34.2 mg/L using the 30‐minute postdialysis value for the calculation. Serum levels of phosphorus and B2M decrease dramatically during an 8‐hour session. Future studies are necessary to determine whether the enhanced solute removal with longer HD sessions translates into an improved outcome for HD patients.     

Assessment of subjective and hemodynamic tolerance of different high‐ and low‐flux dialysis membranes in patients undergoing chronic intermittent hemodialysis: A randomized controlled trial

Clinical experience and experimental data suggest that intradialytic hemodynamic profiles could be influenced by the characteristics of the dialysis membranes. Even within the worldwide used polysulfone family, intolerance to specific membranes was occasionally evoked. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamically some of the commonly used polysulfone dialyzers in Switzerland. We performed an open‐label, randomized, cross‐over trial, including 25 hemodialysis patients. Four polysulfone dialyzers, A (Revaclear high‐flux, Gambro, Stockholm, Sweden), B (Helixone high‐flux, Fresenius), C (Xevonta high‐flux, BBraun, Melsungen, Germany), and D (Helixone low‐flux, Fresenius, Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany), were compared. The hemodynamic profile was assessed and patients were asked to provide tolerance feedback. The mean score (±SD) subjectively assigned to dialysis quality on a 1–10 scale was A 8.4 ± 1.3, B 8.6 ± 1.3, C 8.5 ± 1.6, D 8.5 ± 1.5. Kt/V was A 1.58 ± 0.30, B 1.67 ± 0.33, C 1.62 ± 0.32, D 1.45 ± 0.31. The low‐ compared with the high‐flux membranes, correlated to higher systolic (128.1 ± 13.1 vs. 125.6 ± 12.1 mmHg, P < 0.01) and diastolic (76.8 ± 8.7 vs. 75.3 ± 9.0 mmHg; P < 0.05) pressures, higher peripheral resistance (1.44 ± 0.19 vs. 1.40 ± 0.18 s × mmHg/mL; P < 0.05) and lower cardiac output (3.76 ± 0.62 vs. 3.82 ± 0.59 L/min; P < 0.05). Hypotension events (decrease in systolic blood pressure by >20 mmHg) were 70 with A, 87 with B, 73 with C, and 75 with D (P < 0.01 B vs. A, 0.05 B vs. C and 0.07 B vs. D). The low‐flux membrane correlated to higher blood pressure levels compared with the high‐flux ones. The Helixone high‐flux membrane ensured the best efficiency. Unfortunately, the very same dialyzer correlated to a higher incidence of hypotensive episodes.     

Quotidian dialysis Survival in 221 patients treated by short daily hemodialysis for 315 patient years

Scanty data suggests that large solutes show a kinetic behavior that is different from urea. The question investigated in this study is whether other small water‐soluble solutes such as some guanidino compounds show a kinetic behavior comparable or dissimilar to that of urea. This study included 7 stable conventional hemodialysis patients without residual diuresis undergoing low flux polysulphone dialysis (F8 and F10HPS). Blood samples were collected from the inlet and outlet blood lines before the dialysis session, after 5, 15, 30, 120 minutes, and immediately after discontinuation of the session. Plasma concentrations of urea, creatinine (CTN), creatine (CT), guanidinosuccinic acid (GSA), guanidinoacetic acid (GAA), guanidine (G), and methylguanidine (MG) were used to calculate corresponding dialyzer clearances. A two‐pool kinetic model was fitted to the measured plasma concentration profiles, resulting in the calculation of the perfused volume (V₁), the total distribution volume (V_tot), and the inter‐compartmental clearance (K₁₂); solute generation and ultrafiltration were determined independently. No significant differences were observed between V₁ and K₁₂ for urea (6.4 ± 3.3 L and 822 ± 345 mL/min) and for the guanidino compounds. However, with respect to V_tot, GSA was distributed in a smaller volume (30.6 ± 4.2 L) compared to urea (42.7 ± 6.0 L ? P < 0.001), while CTN, CT, GAA, G, and MG showed significantly larger volumes (54.0 ± 5.9 L, 98.0 ± 52.3 L, 123.8 ± 66.9 L, 89.7 ± 21.4 L, and 102.6 ± 33.9 L, respectively). These differences resulted in markedly divergent effective solute removal: 67%(urea), 58%(CTN), 42%(CT), 76%(GSA), 37%(GAA), 43%(G), and 42%(MG). In conclusion, the kinetics of the guanidino compounds under study are different from that of urea; hence, urea kinetics are not representative for the removal of other uremic solutes, even if they are small and water‐soluble like urea.     

Safety analysis of intermittent hemodialysis in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices

Dialysis centers adopt a cautious approach when it comes to performing intermittent hemodialysis (HD) on patients with continuous flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) because of the potential for volume flux‐related complications and absence of pulsatile blood pressure for monitoring. Many patients have to remain hospitalized because of the inability of the dialysis centers to accept them for outpatient dialysis. In this study, the effect of HD was observed in such patients. Between June 2009 and October 2012, 139 patients received LVADs, of which 10 patients (7%) required intermittent HD postoperatively. The mean age of the patients was 53 ± 14 years and 90% were men. A total of 281 dialysis sessions were administered amounting to 1025 hours of dialysis. The mean systolic blood pressure monitored with Doppler device was 97 ± 18 mmHg. Dialysis durations averaged 218 ± 18 minutes. Mean blood flow rate was 334 ± 38 cc/min, and 2.6 ± 1.1 L was ultrafiltrated during each session. Only 15 (5.3%) sessions were interrupted or terminated in six patients. The reasons for termination were symptomatic hypotension—6 (2.1%), asymptomatic hypotension—3 (1%), ventricular tachycardia—1 (0.36%), dialysis machine malfunction—2 (0.7%), low phosphorus—2 (0.7%), and abdominal cramps—1 (0.36%). Volume expansion was necessary on three occasions. Low‐flow device alarms were registered during two (0.71%) sessions. The results showed no serious adverse effects or deaths.     

Regional Anticoagulation with Sodium Citrate in Pediatric Patients on Intermittent Hemodialysis Therapy with Bleeding Risks

Heparin‐free anticoagulation in hemodialysis (HD) is advocated for patients with clotting abnormalities and risk of bleeding. Objective: First publication on regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) in children. RCA is free from systemic effects, guarantees excellent dialyzer life, but requires careful monitoring. Methods: We report on 3 patients treated by intermittent RCA HD (4 h each, high‐flux dialyzer F40, Fresenius): (1) 17‐year‐old boy (renal transplant failure, access via cubital Cimino fistula) after hypertensive intra‐cerebral hemorrhage (2 sessions); (2) 13‐year‐old girl (hemolytic uremic syndrome, access via jugular vein Shaldon catheter) after abdominal surgery and bleeding (8 sessions); and (3) 7‐year‐old boy (hyperoxaluria, access via PermCath^® jugular vein catheter) after renal transplant biopsy (3 sessions). Sodium citrate 30% was infused into the extra corporeal circuit (blood flow 150 mL/min) before dialyzer (initial flow 30 mL/min) and calcium gluconate 10% for antidote into venous line near of catheter or fistula (initial flow 40 mL/min). Post‐dialyzer extracorporeal serum Ca⁺⁺ (aim < 0.3 mmol/L) and pre‐dialyzer intra‐corporeal Ca⁺⁺ (aim > 0.9) were measured for every 30 min. Serum Na⁺, K⁺, base excess (BE), blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate, and blood out‐flow and in‐flow pressure were also monitored. Results: For adequate RCA (mean extracorporeal serum Ca⁺⁺ 0.24 ± 0.04 mmol/L), a mean citrate flow of 36.1 ± 5.9 mL/h and a mean calcium substitution rate of 40.8 ± 3.4 mL/h were needed. Intra‐corporeal Ca⁺⁺ was kept at 1.10 ± 0.07 mmol/L. Extracorporeal activated clotting time (ACT) was 194 ± 41 and intra‐corporeal ACT 90 ± 12 sec. Serum Na⁺, K⁺, and BE during HD were 138 ± 2, 3.5 ± 0.3, and ?0.6 ± 1.1 mmol/L, respectively. Mean arterial blood pressures of patients 1–3 were 117 ± 5, 103 ± 5, and 102 ± 6 mmHg. All patients were stable and without any bleeding during HD. The only adverse event was 1 episode of hypocalcemia (Ca⁺⁺ < 0.6 mmol/L) cured by stopping dialysis. Conclusions: Local anticoagulation with sodium citrate during intermittent HD can be applied safely in children and adolescents.     

Dialysate saving by automated control of flow rates: comparison between individualized online hemodiafiltration and standard hemodialysis

Cost reduction and quality improvement seem to be conflicting issues. However, online hemodiafiltration (oHDF) with new automatic functions offers a cost‐efficient therapy compared to hemodialysis (HD). Seven dialysis centers conducted a randomized clinical trial with cross‐over design: high‐flux HD vs. postdilutional oHDF with functions coupling both dialysate and substitution flow rates to blood flow rates. During the 6 weeks of the study, all treatment parameters remained unchanged for HD and oHDF, apart from dialysate and substitution flow rate. Treatment data were recorded during each treatment, and predialytic and postdialytic concentrations of urea were recorded at the end of each study phase. The analysis involved 956 treatments of 54 patients. The mean dialysate consumption was 123.2 ± 6.4 l for HD and 113.4 ± 14.9 l for oHDF (p < 0.0001), the mean dialysis dose was 1.42 ± 0.23 for HD and 1.47 ± 0.26 for oHDF (p < 0.0001); oHDF resulted in a lower dialysate consumption (8.0% less) and a slightly increased dialysis dose (Kt/V 3.5% higher) compared to HD. oHDF with the investigated automatic functions offers substantial savings in dialysate consumption without decreasing dialysis dose.     

Hemodialysis‐induced acute pancreatitis secondary to kinked hemodialysis blood lines

Objective: Blood‐membrane interaction during hemodialysis may contribute to inflammatory process, which accelerates the development of atherosclerosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients (MHD). Vitamin E has been widely used against oxidative stress in MHD. One of the strategies for the utilization of vitamin E in MHD patients is the usage of vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer. We investigated the effects of vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer on serum C‐reactive protein and interleukin‐6, the biomarker of inflammation, compared to polysulfone membrane dialyzer. Methods: Vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer (1.5‐m² surface area) and synthetic polysulfone dialyzer (1.5‐m² surface area) were manipulated in a crossover clinical study for 24 weeks in 10 non‐diabetic MHD patients. Run‐in and wash‐out periods (Cellulose tri‐acetate) were performed for 4 weeks before the treatment. Pre‐ and post‐dialysis blood samples were taken at the begining and the end of each dialyzer period (12 weeks). High‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) were examined. Results: Mean age of the patients was 54.9 years old. CRP and IL‐6 levels were similarly increased after dialysis in both groups (4.8 ± 0.7 and 37.2 ± 9.4, respectively). The CRP and IL‐6 level in vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer treatment were lower than in polysulfone treatment (5.0 ± 1.2, p < 0.008 and 67.2 ± 12.4, p < 0.04, respectively). Serum albumin, hemoglobin level, and white blood cell count were not affected by types of dialyzer membrane. Conclusions: In our study, hemodialysis stimulated the inflammation as the previous study. Vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer may diminish the inflammatory process in MHD patients and may also prevent further atherosclerosis.     

Effects of silymarin on biochemical and oxidative stress markers in end‐stage renal disease patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

Introduction End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients especially those undergoing dialysis are vulnerable to several complications, in particular those related to oxidative stress. Silymarin is an herbal medicine commonly used as an antioxidant in different pathologies. Methods To evaluate the effect of silymarin on biochemical and oxidative stress markers, 50 ESRD patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis were randomly divided into two groups of silymarin (n = 28) and control (n = 22) and received silymarin (140 mg every 8 hours) or placebo for 2 months, respectively. Ferric reducing antioxidant power and total 8‐iso‐prostaglandin F_2α were measured in plasma, while catalase enzyme activity was measured in erythrocytes of both groups before and after treatment. Findings Ferric reducing antioxidant power values after treatment were significantly decreased in silymarin group compared to before treatment values (17.2 ± 2.9 and 15.9 ± 3.1 µM equivalent of quercetin/dL, respectively, P < 0.05). Conversely, catalase levels were increased 17.3% after silymarin consumption, while it was decreased 9.1% in control group. Further, hemoglobin (from 10.94 ± 2.17 to 11.54 ± 2.03 g/dL, P < 0.05) and albumin levels (from 3.48 ± 0.67 to 3.61 ± 0.53 g/dL, P < 0.05) were significantly increased after silymarin administration. Discussion It is concluded that silymarin could be regarded as a supplementary therapy for ESRD patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis in order to reduce complications.     

Platelet activation and clotting cascade activation by dialyzers designed for high volume online hemodiafiltration

Introduction: Hemodialysis patients are pro‐thrombotic. Higher volume online postdilutional hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF), with increasing hematocrit increases the risk of clotting in the extracorporeal circuit (ECC). We wished to determine whether OL‐HDF increased platelet activation and ECC clotting. Methods: Coagulation parameters, platelet, white cell, and endothelial activation markers were measured at the start and end of dialysis sessions in 10 patients and also pre‐ and post‐dialyzer after 15 minutes using two different dialyzers designed for high volume OL‐HDF; cellulose triacetate (TAGP) and polysulphone (PS), and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). Patients were anticoagulated with a heparin bolus. Findings: At the start of OL‐HDF, D dimers, thrombin antithrombin complexes (TATs), and soluble adhesions molecules (sICAM‐1 and sVCAM‐1) were increased. Post‐treatment soluble P selectin (PS/PVP 26.7 ± 7.1 versus 36.6 ± 9.9; TAGP 28.7 ± 7.2 versus 43.5 ± 8.4 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and soluble CD40 ligand (PS/PVP 297 ± 228 versus 552 ± 272, TAGP 245 ± 187 versus 390 ± 205 ng/ml, P < 0.05) increased. Post‐dialyzer concentrations increased versus pre‐dialyzer for tissue factor (PS/PVP 117 ± 12 versus 136 ± 16, TAGP 100 ± 25 versus 128 ± 40 ng/ml, P < 0.05), factor VIIIc (PS/PVP 174 ± 54 versus 237 ± 83, TAGP 163 ± 60 versus 247 ± 102 IU/ml, P < 0.01), sVCAM‐1 (PS/PVP 782 ± 64 versus 918 ± 140, TAGP 722 ± 121 versus 889 ± 168 ng/ml, P < 0.01), and D‐dimers (PS/PVP 292 ± 132 versus 355 ± 167, TAGP 300 ± 129 versus 391 ± 171 ng/ml, P < 0.001). There was no macroscopic thrombus noted in the ECC, and no increase in microparticles, platelet factor‐4, or TATs. Discussion: Despite being pro‐thrombotic, with activation of platelets, and lymphocytes during passage through ECC, no macroscopic clotting, or increased TATs were noted during OL‐HDF, and no major differences between cellulosic and polysulphone dialyzers.     

Use of 3‐hour daily hemodialysis and paricalcitol in patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism: A case series

Patients with poor metabolic control receiving conventional hemodialysis are at risk for developing severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. We postulated that daily hemodialysis may be effective at controlling parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the setting of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism by improving the control of hyperphosphatemia and allowing increased use of vitamin D analogs. We present 5 patients with severe secondary hyperparathyroidism (median iPTH=1783 pg/mL) who were treated with 3‐hour daily hemodialysis (3 hours × 6 times a week). Daily hemodialysis, at 1 year, was associated with a 70.4% reduction in median PTH (1783 pg/mL [interquartile range: 1321–1983]–472 pg/mL [334, 704], P<0.001). Additionally, there was an increase in paricalcitol dose from 0 mcg/d to 10.8 (2.00, 11.7) mcg/d, a 39% reduction in calcium × phosphorus product (80.3 ± 26.8–48.9 ± 14.0, P<0.01), a 52% reduction in serum phosphorus (9.90 ± 2.34–4.75 ± 0.79 mg/dL, P<0.0001), and a 17.6% increase in serum calcium (8.18 ± 2.04–9.62 ± 0.93 mg/dL, P<0.01). Three‐hour daily hemodialysis with the use of high‐dose paricalcitol is associated with improved control of severe secondary hyperparathyroidism.     

Antibiotic lock: In vitro stability of gentamicin and sodium citrate stored in dialysis catheters at 37 °C

Catheter‐related bacteremia (CRB) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality especially among patients receiving hemodialysis. Antibiotic lock therapy represents a promising technique in the treatment of CRB. Several studies have evaluated antibiotics in combination with heparin as an interdialytic locking solution for prophylaxis of CRB. The objective of this study was to evaluate the stability of gentamicin and sodium citrate in hemodialysis catheters as an interdialytic lock. Solutions containing gentamicin 2.5 mg/mL and sodium citrate 40 mg/mL (4%) were prepared individually and in combination. The solutions were instilled into dialysis catheters and stored at 37 °C for 96 h. Samples were withdrawn randomly from catheter lumens at 24‐hour intervals for 4 days and stored at ?20 °C until analysis. The samples were analyzed with validated, stability‐indicating HPLC assays. The luminal concentration of gentamicin 2.5 mg/mL, sodium citrate 40 mg/mL (4%), and the combination was determined on study days 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4. When gentamicin was combined with sodium citrate and stored at 37 °C in dialysis catheters, the solution showed no decrease in either the gentamicin or the sodium citrate concentrations over the 96‐hour study period. The percent of the original concentration at 96 h was 102.4±1.03 for gentamicin and 102.9±1.25 for citrate (P=0.5556). The combination of gentamicin 2.5 mg/mL and sodium citrate 40 mg/mL (4%) can be retained in hemodialysis catheters for at least 96 h at 37 °C with no evidence of degradation.     

Reprocessing high‐flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short‐daily online hemodiafiltration

There are no studies evaluating the impact of dialyzer reprocessing on solute removal in short‐daily online hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of dialyzer reuse on solute removal in daily OL‐HDF and compare with that in high‐flux short‐daily hemodialysis (SDH). Fourteen patients undergoing a SDH program were included. Pre‐dialysis and post‐dialysis blood samples and effluent dialysate were collected in the 1st, 7th, and 13th dialyzer uses in SDH sessions and in daily OL‐HDF sessions. Directly quantified small solute (urea, phosphorus, creatinine, and uric acid) total mass removal (TM_DQ) and clearance (K_DQ) were similar when the 1st, 7th, and 13th dialyzer SDH uses were compared with the 1st, 7th, and 13th daily OL‐HDF uses. TM_DQ and K_DQ of small solutes were similar among analyzed dialyzer uses in SDH sessions and in daily OL‐HDF sessions. β₂‐Microglobulin TM_DQ and K_DQ were statistically higher in daily OL‐HDF dialyzer uses than in the respective SDH uses. There was no difference in β₂‐microglobulin TM_DQ and K_DQ among dialyzer uses in daily OL‐HDF sessions or in SDH sessions. In daily OL‐HDF, albumin loss was significantly different among dialyzer uses (P < 0.001), being lower in the 7th and 13th dialyzer uses than in the first use. Dialyzer reprocessing did not impair solute extraction in daily OL‐HDF. β₂‐Microglobulin removal was greater in daily OL‐HDF than in SDH sessions, without significant differences in other solutes extraction. There was a significant reduction in intradialytic albumin loss with dialyzer reprocessing in daily OL‐HDF sessions.     

Tandem dialyzers with dual monitors to meet Kt/V targets

Purpose:  This study evaluated improvements in dialyzer reuse parameters and clinical outcomes associated with a CQI project in a hospital‐based dialysis center in which high flux polysulfone dialyzers were replaced with high flux Polyflux® dialyzers (GAMBRO® Renal Products). Methods:  Dialyzers were reprocessed using a Renatron® II Dialyzer Reprocessing System in conjunction with Renalin® sterilant (Minntech Corp.). Renalog® RM software was used to track dialyzer reprocessing rates and failures. Reasons for dialyzer failure included inadequate dialyzer volume; excess pressure; appearance; clotting during use; and maximum number of uses reached. The average number of dialyzer reuses with polysulfone dialyzers between January and June 2002 were compared to that achieved with Polyflux® dialyzers for the same periods in 2003 and 2004. Analysis periods were separated to avoid the impact of dialyzer transition on clinical parameters. Achievement of URR goals during these same periods was likewise compared. Results:  Transition from polysulfone to Polyflux® dialyzers was associated with a >40% increase in average number of reuses between 2002 and 2003 and a >63% increase comparing the 2002 and 2004 periods. During the 2002 analysis period with polysulfone dialyzers the target URR of 65% was achieved in approximately 75% of hemodialysis patients; this increased to nearly 95% with Polyflux® dialyzers in both the 2003 and 2004 periods, despite more reprocessing of these dialyzers. Conclusions:  These results demonstrate an improvement in both reuse efficiency and clinical outcomes associated with Polyflux dialyzers. Identifying clinical products through CQI studies that provide an economic and clinical advantage plays an important role in the success of hospital‐based hemodialysis.     

Effect of Vitamin E Dialyzer Membrane on Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients

Red blood cell (RBC) survival in patients on chronic maintenance hemodialysis (HD) has been reported to be shortened due to the oxidative damage of RBC membrane. The use of antioxidants might help in the control of anemia and reduce the erythropoietin (EPO) dose needed. Objective: The objective was to determine the effects of vitamin E‐bonded dialyzer membrane (VEM) on anemia and EPO requirements in chronic HD patients. Patients and methods: We prospectively studied 19 stable patients on HD (8 males, age 58.47, range 31–76 years) who were shifted from other dialyzer membranes to VEM for 6 months. At baseline they were given a mean dose of EPO of 90.6 ± 51 U kg^–1 BW^–1 week^–1. Clinical data, dry body weight corrected pre‐dialysis RBC, hemoglobin, reticulocytes, serum iron and ferritin, complete biochemistry, iPTH, and CRP were studied at 3 and 6 months, while therapy scheme was reevaluated monthly. Results: A significant rise, compared to the baseline, was found in hemoglobin and in RBC at 3 months of treatment (12.44 ± 1.16 g/dL vs. 11.2 ± 1.2 g/dL, p = 0.002; and 4.01 ± 0.53 × 10⁶/μL vs. 3.64 ± 0.5 × 10⁶/μL, p < 0.05) and at the end of follow‐up (12.17 ± 1.33 g/dL vs. 11.2 ± 1.2 g/dL, p < 0.05; and 4.03 ± 0.53 × 10⁶/μL vs. 3.64 ± 0.5 × 106/μL, p < 0.05). No significant change in serum iron and ferritin, reticulocytes, EPO dose used, iPTH, Kt/V, or CRP was found at the end of follow‐up compared to the baseline (68.8 ± 17 mg/dL vs. 67.9 ± 18 mg/dL, p = NS; 421 ± 296 mg/dL vs. 478 ± 359 mg/dL, p = NS; 3.76 ± 0.89 × 10⁴/μL vs. 3.82 ± 0.78 × 10⁴/μL, p = NS; 90.2 ± 53 U kg^–1 BW^–1 week^–1 vs. 90.6 ± 51 U kg^–1 BW^–1 week^–1, p = NS; 157 ± 43 pg/dL vs. 148 ± 56 pg/dL, p = NS; 1.21 ± 0.22 vs. 1.2 ± 0.17, p = NS; 7.15 ± 5.42 mg/L vs. 15.38 ± 29.8 mg/L, p = NS, respectively). Conclusions: Despite the small number of patients and the short time interval of treatment, an antioxidant effect of VEM apparently achieved early a better control of anemia in HD patients.     

Patient‐specific phosphorus mobilization clearance during nocturnal and short daily hemodialysis

The kinetics of plasma phosphorus during different hemodialysis (HD) modalities are incompletely understood. We recently demonstrated that a pseudo one‐compartment kinetic model including phosphorus mobilization from various body compartments into extracellular fluids can describe intradialytic and postdialytic rebound kinetics of plasma phosphorus during conventional and short 2‐hour HD treatments. In this model, individual patient differences in phosphorus kinetics were characterized by a single parameter, the phosphorus mobilization clearance (K_M). In this report we determined K_M in patients treated by in‐center nocturnal HD (ICNHD) and short daily HD (SDHD) with low dialyzer phosphate clearance. In the ICNHD study, eight patients underwent 8‐hour HD treatments where intradialytic and postdialytic plasma samples were collected; K_M values were determined by nonlinear regression of plasma concentration as a function of time. In the SDHD study, five patients were studied during 28 treatments for approximately 3 hours. Here, K_M was calculated using only predialytic and postdialytic plasma phosphorus concentrations. Dialyzer phosphate clearances were 134 ± 20 (mean ± SD) and 95 ± 16 mL/min during ICNHD and SDHD, respectively. K_M values for the respective therapies were 124 ± 83 and 103 ± 33 mL/min, comparable to those determined previously during conventional and short HD treatments of 98 ± 44 mL/min. When results from ICNHD, SDHD, and previous HD modalities were combined, K_M was directly correlated with postdialytic body weight (r = 0.38, P = 0.025) and inversely correlated with predialytic phosphorus concentration (r = ?0.47, P = 0.005). These findings suggest that phosphorus kinetics during various HD modalities can be described by a pseudo one‐compartment model.