共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
矿山采场顶板冒落是地下矿山开采的常见灾害,根据某矿采场顶板冒落的各种现象,分析了其产生的原因,提出了预防顶板冒落的措施,希望能对该矿的采矿生产有指导作用。 相似文献
2.
3.
胶东某矿采场顶板冒落原因分析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
矿山采场顶板冒落是地下矿山开采的常见灾害,根据某矿采场顶板冒落的各种现象,分析了其产生的原因,提出了预防顶板冒落的措施,希望能对该矿的采矿生产有指导作用。 相似文献
4.
为了计算某铁矿采矿稳定的暴露面积,针对顶板、侧帮、上下盘围岩在不同采场尺寸下的稳定性问题,采用Mathews稳定图方法对其进行了计算分析,得到了某铁矿顶板、侧帮、上下盘围岩在不同采场尺寸条件下的暴露面积,得出了某铁矿稳定的暴露面积大小范围,从而使矿山能更好地控制顶板、侧帮、上下盘围岩的稳定性。 相似文献
5.
6.
采场顶板大面积冒落的破坏性及防治原理 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
熊仁钦 《矿山压力与顶板管理》1995,(3):35-38
本文利用流体力学理论和能量理论,论述了采场顶板大面积冒落的破坏机理,分析了防治顶板大面积冒落的各种主动措施。 相似文献
7.
8.
为了分析大尺寸采场的稳定性并优化采场参数,对森鑫矿业三道桥铅锌矿试验采场进行了现场地质调查、地质编录、室内岩石力学试验等工作,得到了评价矿山岩体质量的多种基础指标。对试验采场矿岩进行了岩体质量分级,并估算了其岩体力学参数。根据取得的结果,利用扩展的Mathews稳定图法对试验采场在当前尺寸下的稳定性进行了分析,试验采场上盘的破坏概率较大,需要进行采场结构参数的优化。基于扩展的Mathews稳定图法对试验采场参数进行优化,利用理论法和数值模拟对优化的结果进行验证。验证的结果与利用扩展的Mathews稳定图法得出的结果一致,最终确定了试验采场需保留顶柱的安全厚度为7 m。 相似文献
9.
10.
张东俭 《矿山压力与顶板管理》1999,(2):54-55,61
在实测的基础上,分析了济宁二号炮矿复杂地质条件下采场直接顶的垮落特征和老顶的运动规律,并据此进行了顶板分类,分析了该地质条件下支架与围岩的相互作用特征及支架的适应性,为支架合理选型、顶板的有效控制提供了依据。 相似文献
11.
12.
合理的采矿结构参数是保障金属矿地下开采的前提。为了优化缓倾斜破碎金矿体的采场结构参数,以采场稳定概率大于95%为目标,引进拓展的 Mathews 稳定图法来优化采场最大跨度和暴露面尺寸,并采用考虑岩梁自重的弹性力学简支梁等理论进行验证。结果表明,当采场长度80 m时,回采进路跨度小于4.36 m时即可保证采场不会破坏;当采场长度80m时,采场顶板跨度为4.3 m,采场上盘跨度为3.0 m,采场稳定概率能达到95%;优化后的上向进路充填法采场结构参数为3 m×3.5 m。现场工业试验表明,该采场结构参数条件下回采过程中采场顶板及围岩未发生垮落及剥落现象,采场稳定性良好。因此,基于拓展的Mathews稳定图法适用于缓倾斜破碎矿体的采场结构参数优化。 相似文献
13.
针对环境再造采场顶板沉降影响因素复杂、数据离散等特点,选用一种仿生智能算法改进的概率神经网络(CFOAPNN),避免模型陷入局部极值,增加网络预测精度,建立采场顶板沉降量预测模型。模型选取岩体强度、充填体抗拉强度等8个主要影响因素。以广东某铅锌矿的29个代表性样本对模型进行训练、预测,并对比传统预测模型结果准确性,利用局部敏感性分析法评价模型影响因素对预测精度的影响。结果表明:最主要影响因素为充填体抗拉强度,其次为采场暴露面积。所构建的CFOA-PNN模型正确率为88.9%,明显优于传统预测模型。 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
针对某矿急倾斜采场上盘顶板局部冒落,提出采用2~3排预应力锚杆加条网构成的锚杆条网带沿倾向间隔一定距离支护该顶板。应用材料力学建立该顶板的锚杆条网带支护力学模型,分析其冒落机理,并基于三弯矩方程推导锚杆条网带支护间距设计公式。应用FLAC3D正交数值模拟各种赋存条件下上盘顶板锚杆条网带支护的最佳间距,系统分析矿体埋深、倾角、厚度及顶板岩梁高度对锚杆条网带支护间距的影响,并多元线性回归修正了该支护间距设计公式,最后将修正的公式应用于该矿深部留矿法采场上盘顶板锚杆条网带支护间距设计。研究结果表明:急倾斜采场上盘顶板中央弯矩最大,是冒落控制的关键部位;锚杆条网带支护该顶板具有减跨效应,可以有效减小其中央的集中拉应力,经济有效地避免其冒落。 相似文献
17.
18.
《国际露天开采、回填与环境杂志》2013,27(4):307-339
The stability graph was introduced approximately three decades ago for open stope design. Since then, it has gained wide recognition in open stope design around the world in hard rock metalliferous mining. Several developments have taken place following its initial inception aimed at improving its reliability in predicting the stability state of open stopes. These developments include redefinition of the stability graph number factors, the transition zones and addition of new factors. Various types of stability graphs have also emerged over the years for other purposes such as cablebolt layout design. The original database has also been significantly expanded from the 26 cases in 1981 to 483 cases to date. This article critically reviews the developments of the stability graph to date with the objective of: (1) Synthesising the scattered knowledge of these developments in the literature to a single source. (2) Creating awareness among potential users of the method, of the problems and risks arising from the uncoordinated developments in the method and the consequences of the lack of consensus in the choice of stability number factors. (3) Identifying areas for further research to improve the reliability of the method. (4) Finally, providing guidelines to inexperienced users and practitioners unaware of the various developments on the stability graph on when to use any one of the several stability graph types currently available. The article stresses that as an empirical method, the reliability of the stability graph method is largely dependent on the size, quality and consistency of the database. Hence, there must be consistency in the determination of the stability graph factors and accepted stope stability state transition zones. The present tendency for authors to arbitrarily choose between the original and modified stability number factors result in incomparable data that cannot be combined, while the different transition zones result in different interpretations of the stability state of stopes. The review also shows that there is need for factors that account for stope stand-up time, blast damage and gravity factor that is stress factor dependent. There is also a need to develop procedures for determining stability of open stope surfaces that are made of backfill. The inexperienced user and practitioner unaware of the various versions of the stability graph should be conscious of the different versions and types of stability graphs to make the appropriate choice for his/her design. The stability graph should also be used with caution, when applied to narrow vein orebodies because no version of the graphs accounts for orebody thickness in the definitions of the stability states. 相似文献