Multivariate changes in coordination of postural control following spaceflight

BACKGROUND: Bright light therapy is the recommended treatment for winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD). However, the studies with the best placebo controls have not been able to demonstrate that light treatment has a benefit beyond its placebo effect. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with SAD completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatments for 4 weeks, each 1.5 hours per day: morning light (average start time about 6 AM), evening light (average start about 9 PM), or morning placebo (average start about 6 AM). The bright light (approximately 6000 lux) was produced by light boxes, and the placebos were sham negative-ion generators. Depression ratings using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, SAD version (SIGH-SAD) were performed weekly. RESULTS: There were no differences among the 3 groups in expectation ratings or mean depression scores after 4 weeks of treatment. However, strict response criteria revealed statistically significant differences; after 3 weeks of treatment morning light produced more of the complete or almost complete remissions than placebo. By 1 criterion (24-item SIGH-SAD score <50% of baseline and < or =8), 61% of the patients responded to morning light, 50% to evening light, and 32% to placebo after 4 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Bright light therapy had a specific antidepressant effect beyond its placebo effect, but it took at least 3 weeks for a significant effect to develop. The benefit of light over placebo was in producing more of the full remissions.     

Morning vs evening light treatment of patients with winter depression

BACKGROUND: According to the phase-shift hypothesis for winter depression, morning light (which causes a circadian phase advance) should be more antidepressant than evening light (which causes a delay). Although no studies have shown evening light to be more antidepressant than morning light, investigations have shown either no difference or morning light to be superior. The present study assesses these light-exposure schedules in both crossover and parallel-group comparisons. METHODS: Fifty-one patients and 49 matched controls were studied for 6 weeks. After a prebaseline assessment and a light/dark and sleep/wake adaptation baseline week, subjects were exposed to bright light at either 6 to 8 AM or 7 to 9 PM for 2 weeks. After a week of withdrawal from light treatment, they were crossed over to the other light schedule. Dim-light melatonin onsets were obtained 7 times during the study to assess circadian phase position. RESULTS: Morning light phase-advanced the dim-light melatonin onset and was more antidepressant than evening light, which phase-delayed it. These findings were statistically significant for both crossover and parallel-group comparisons. Dim-light melatonin onsets were generally delayed in the patients compared with the controls. CONCLUSIONS: These results should help establish the importance of circadian (morning or evening) time of light exposure in the treatment of winter depression. We recommend that bright-light exposure be scheduled immediately on awakening in the treatment of most patients with seasonal affective disorder.     

Effects of light treatment on sleep structure in seasonal affective disorder

Twelve outpatients with seasonal affective disorder (depression, winter type) were treated by 1 h of bright light exposure for five mornings. The intervention produced a significant reduction in depression scores, but no change was seen in the sleep electroencephalographic variables recorded after light treatment. Significant changes were seen, however, in ratings of subjective sleepiness. The acrophase of the circadian sleepiness rhythm was phase advanced, the mean level of the sleepiness rhythm was diminished, and the mean values of sleepiness scores were reduced at 8 and 10 a.m. This minimal influence of bright light on sleep structure is unlikely to explain the well-documented antidepressant effect.     

Greater improvement in summer than with light treatment in winter in patients with seasonal affective disorder

OBJECTIVE: The authors sought to compare the degree of mood improvement after light treatment with mood improvement in the subsequent summer in patients with seasonal affective disorder. METHOD: By using the Seasonal Affective Disorder Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the authors rated 15 patients with seasonal affective disorder on three occasions: during winter when the patients were depressed, during winter following 2 weeks of light therapy, and during the following summer. They compared the three conditions by using Friedman's analysis of variance and the Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: The patients' scores on the depression scale were significantly higher after 2 weeks of light therapy in winter than during the following summer. CONCLUSIONS: Light treatment for 2 weeks in winter is only partially effective when compared to summer. Further studies will be necessary to assess if summer's light or other factors are the main contributors to this difference.     

A multicenter study of the light visor for seasonal affective disorder: no difference in efficacy found between two different intensities

Fifty-five patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) were treated with a light visor, a newly developed portable light-delivery system, in a controlled parallel design. A dim (400 lux) visor was compared with a bright (6000 lux) visor for either 30 or 60 minutes in the morning for 1 week. Response rates for these two treatments were 36% and 56%, respectively; the duration of treatment sessions did not affect outcome. There was no evidence that the brighter visor was superior in efficacy to the dimmer one. Significantly greater relapse occurred following withdrawal of the dimmer visor. Alternative explanations for these findings are that the light visor is acting as a placebo or that it is equally effective over a wide range of intensities.     

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression

BACKGROUND: Depression is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children and adolescents. To date, randomized, controlled, double-blind trials of antidepressants (largely tricyclic agents) have yet to reveal that any antidepressant is more effective than placebo. This article is of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression. METHODS: Ninety-six child and adolescent outpatients (aged 7-17 years) with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder were randomized (stratified for age and sex) to 20 mg of fluoxetine or placebo and seen weekly for 8 consecutive weeks. Randomization was preceded by 3 evaluation visits that included structured diagnostic interviews during 2 weeks, followed 1 week later by a 1-week, single-blind placebo run-in. Primary outcome measurements were the global improvement of the Clinical Global Impressions scale and the Children's Depression Rating Scale--Revised, a measure of the severity depressive symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients, 48 were randomized to fluoxetine treatment and 48 to placebo. Using the intent to treat sample, 27 (56%) of those receiving fluoxetine and 16 (33%) receiving placebo were rated "much" or "very much" improved on the Clinical Global Impressions scale at study exit (chi 2 = 5.1, df = 1, P = .02). Significant differences were also noted in weekly ratings of the Children's Depression Rating Scale--Revised after 5 weeks of treatment (using last observation carried forward). Equivalent response rates were found for patients aged 12 years and younger (n = 48) and those aged 13 years and older (n = 48). However, complete symptom remission (Children's Depression Rating Scale--Revised < or = 28) occurred in only 31% of the fluoxetine-treated patients and 23% of the placebo patients. CONCLUSION: Fluoxetine was superior to placebo in the acute phase treatment of major depressive disorder in child and adolescent outpatients with severe, persistent depression. Complete remission of symptoms was rare.     

Seasonal affective disorders

Seasonal affective disorder is a pattern of major depressive episodes that occur and remit with changes in seasons. It may be seen in major depressive or bipolar disorders, as described in the Diagnostic and Statistical. Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV). The most recognized form of seasonal affective disorder, "winter depression," is characterized by recurrent episodes of depression, hypersomnia, augmented appetite with carbohydrate craving, and weight gain that begin in the autumn and continue through the winter months. Physicians have many options for treating seasonal affective disorder. While questions regarding the validity of seasonal affective disorder as a syndrome and the mechanism of action of light therapy continue to be investigated, the established effectiveness of light therapy in patients with winter depression supports the usefulness of assessment for this seasonal pattern and consideration of light therapy as an option in addition to existing treatment choices.     

Fall/winter depression and its therapy

Seasonal changes in human behavior have been recognized since ancient times. Starting in 1980 systematic research has been carried out by Rosenthal et al. (1984), who described and characterized a psychopathological and clinical syndrome which is linked to fall/winter and shows remission in spring/summer and which was termed seasonal affective disorder (SAD). The symptomatology includes depressed mood, decreased energy, hypersomnia, increased appetite and subsequently weight gain and frequently carbohydrate craving. The efficacy of light therapy with bright, fluorescent, full-spectrum light has been widely demonstrated for treatment of fall/winter SAD. In addition, treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors appears to be successful in this condition.     

Phototherapy. An alternative for seasonal affective disorders or sleep disorders

Although clinicians have observed for centuries that som depressed patients become worse in the winter, it was first in 1984 that Norman Rosenthal and co-workers described a syndrome which they called seasonal affective disorder (SAD), characterised by winter depression, lethargy and a craving for carbohydrate. Phototherapy was proved to be an effective treatment right from the start. Recently it has been reported that not only depression, but also panic disorder and obsessive compulsive disorders may exhibit a seasonal pattern and thus benefit from phototherapy. Phototherapy may also benefit patients suffering from "sun-downing", a syndrome of confusion and agitation in the evening in persons with Alzheimer's disease. Based on the observation that bright light may both elevate brain serotonin and ameliorate sleep abnormalities, the authors report the results of phototherapy for treatment of non-seasonal depressions, either alone or in combination with antidepressants or sleep deprivation.     

Effects of meta-chlorophenylpiperazine infusions in patients with seasonal affective disorder and healthy control subjects. Diurnal responses and nocturnal regulatory mechanisms

BACKGROUND: Multiple lines of evidence suggest that brain serotonergic systems may be disturbed in seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Previously, we found that the serotonergic agent meta-chlorophenylpiperazine (m-CPP) produced increases in activation and euphoria in depressed patients with SAD, but not in patients with SAD following light treatment or in the summer, nor in healthy control subjects in any condition. In the present study, we attempted to replicate and extend this finding using better methods. METHODS: Seventeen outpatients with SAD and 15 control subjects underwent successive 3-week periods of bright light treatment and light avoidance in a randomized order. During the third week of each condition, on 2 different occasions, subjects were admitted to the hospital for a night of sleep (core temperatures were recorded), followed by infusions of m-CPP (0.08 mg/kg) or placebo the next morning. Dependent measures included the 24-item National Institute of Mental Health Self-Rating Scale, plasma corticotropin, cortisol, prolactin, growth hormone, and norepinephrine concentrations, and core temperatures. RESULTS: Meta-chlorophenylpiperazine produced (1) significant increases in "activation-euphoria" ratings only in depressed patients with SAD in the untreated condition and (2) blunted corticotropin and norepinephrine responses in patients with SAD compared with controls across both light treatment conditions. In both groups, light treatment was associated with significant reductions in nocturnal core temperatures, which were correlated with similarly significant reductions in mean diurnal growth hormone concentrations. In patients with SAD, (1) the reductions in nocturnal core temperatures also were correlated with the reductions in baseline depression ratings and (2) the reductions in mean growth hormone concentrations were significantly smaller compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The abnormal m-CPP-induced activation-euphoria responses represent a replicated state marker of winter depression in patients with SAD. The blunted m-CPP-induced responsiveness of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system may represent traitlike abnormalities. The improvements in mood following light treatment in patients with SAD seem to be associated with the lowering of nocturnal core temperatures. The findings, although not easily explained based on a uniform abnormality of serotonin receptors, are nonetheless compatible with the notion that selected regions of the central nervous system are deficient in serotonin transmission during winter depression.     

Winter depression and phototherapy. The state of the art

Winter depression (seasonal affective disorder, SAD) is characterised by a seasonal major depressive episode in the last 2 years. Hypersomnia, carbohydrate-craving and weight-gain are specific traits. These patients preferentially seek help from their General Practitioner. Current research on the aetiology of SAD covers fields such as retinal deficiency, phase-disturbance of the internal circadian rhythms given by internal oscillators and neuro-endocrinologically expressed disorders, assuming that melatonin is the main mediator of human circadian systems in the CNS. Disorders of neurotransmitters (serotonin) are another cue. Recent longitudinal studies show a prevalence of seasonal depressive symptoms in up to 10% of the general population. Among patients treated for depression, the prevalence of SAD is even higher. The SAD sex-ratio of women to men of 3 to 1 is found repeatedly. SAD becomes rare above the age of 50. Effectiveness of phototherapy is showed in nearly all controlled studies. Bright light appears to be most effective for patients with mild SAD. Hypersomnia and hyperphagia seem to be predictors of response to bright light therapy. To enable evaluation of unspecific therapeutic factors in phototherapy a true placebo for bright light-studies is still to be found. Possible new indications for photo therapy are currently being explored. Bright light for non- seasonal depression has been tested with encouraging results; panic disorders seem to have features in common with SAD; effectiveness in bulimia has been suggested and recently sleep disorders in elderly patients have been successfully and substantially diminished.     

Cognitive-behavioral factors in seasonal affective disorder.

To longitudinally examine cognitive-behavioral correlates of seasonal affective disorder (SAD), the authors assessed women with a history of SAD and nondepressed, matched controls across fall, winter, and summer. SAD history participants reported more automatic negative thoughts throughout the year than controls and demonstrated a progression from decreased activity enjoyment during fall to reduced activity frequency during winter. Ruminative response style, measured in fall, predicted symptom severity during the winter. Across assessments, SAD history women endorsed greater depressive affect in response to low light intensity stimuli than to bright or ambiguous intensity stimuli, but less depressed mood to bright light stimuli than controls. These results suggest that the cognitive-behavioral factors related to nonseasonal depression may play a role in SAD. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of bright light on sleepiness, melatonin, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) in winter seasonal affective disorder

Sixteen patients with winter seasonal affective disorder and 13 healthy controls were exposed to 3300 lx of cool-white fluorescent light for either 1 hour or 15 min in the morning for 2 weeks during the winter. Subjective sleepiness, melatonin concentration in saliva, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) concentration were measured before and after the 2-week trial as well as the following summer when the patients were well. There were no significant differences in the baseline values between the patients and healthy subjects. No significant differences in the outcome measures were observed in the patients or the controls in the two groups of each after the trial. The exposure to bright light resulted in a significant decrease in subjective sleepiness early in the evening in the patients but not in the control subjects. The reduction of depressive symptoms was associated with the decrease in subjective sleepiness but not with the changes in the melatonin or vitamin D concentrations.     

Melatonin and seasonal depression

Melatonin (MEL) hypothesis in seasonal affective disorders (SAD) is supported by: a) historical hint; b) circadian and seasonal MEL periodicity with evidence that the SAD is related to photoperiod; c) relationship between incidence and severity of SAD and latitude; d) the response to bright artificial light (ineffective in depression) which mimics summer time; e) MEL administration can induce some symptoms of the SAD; f) several antidepressant drugs increase MEL plasma levels. Several of these findings are disproved: the light acts independently from the MEL, some antidepressant agents act without modifying MEL levels; a consistent alteration in MEL secretion within SAD has not been convincingly demonstrated. Relationship between incidence and severity of SAD and latitude suggests a new potential implication of MEL in SAD. The daytime melatonin values reflect changes along the scale of a year in sunshine. Accordingly, the about-yearly periodicity, much larger in amplitude than the half-yearly component, yields ratios smaller than unity. By contrast during darkness an about-half-yearly component is more prominent. As the aurora zone is approached, the intensity of magnetic disturbances increases. Thus, the intensity of these two variables shows inverse relationships with latitude and geomagnetic field decreases plasma levels of MEL and inhibits MEL function.     

Melatonin in light treatment of patients with seasonal and nonseasonal depression

Melatonin as a marker of circadian rhythm and the effect of bright light on melatonin were studied in 63 depressed patients, 42 with a seasonal pattern and 21 with a nonseasonal pattern. The patients were matched for age, time of treatment and severity of depression. Before light treatment, blood was sampled for melatonin and depression was clinically rated with the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Two hours of light treatment, 350 cd/m2, was given daily for 10 days 0600 to 0800 or 1800 to 2000. Of the 42 patients with seasonal depression, 26 were treated with morning light and, 16 with evening light. The melatonin amplitude was significantly decreased by light, and the melatonin phase position was advanced by morning light and delayed by evening light. All patients except for 3 in each group changed in the expected direction. Although the patients with seasonal pattern had a more favorable outcome than patients with nonseasonal pattern, there was no difference in therapeutic outcome related to the baseline melatonin phase position. The hypothesis that the short term clinical effects of light therapy either in the morning or evening are related to pretreatment melatonin levels or alteration of melatonin amplitude or phase position was not supported in the study. There was also no significant difference between the seasonal and nonseasonal patients related to the degree of light suppression of melatonin and the rebound effect of serum melatonin levels following bright level exposure between 2200 and 2300 before regular light treatment.     

Treatment of major depression in HIV-seropositive men. HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center Group

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine plus group psychotherapy versus group psychotherapy alone in HIV-seropositive men (based on 1986 CDC classes II, III, and IV.C.2) who had been diagnosed with major depressive disorder (DSM-III-R). METHOD: During a 7-week trial, patients were treated with fluoxetine 20-60 mg or placebo 1-3 capsules per day and were seen in weekly supportive group psychotherapy. In addition, subjects were rated on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17), Clinical Global Impressions scales for Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and the short version of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-13). Of the 47 patients enrolled in the study, 25 were administered fluoxetine and 22 were given placebo. RESULTS: Subjects who received fluoxetine began to show significantly more improvement than patients who received placebo on both self- and observer-rated scales by the end of the first week of treatment. By endpoint, patients treated with fluoxetine experienced greater mean changes from baseline compared with placebo-treated patients on the HAM-D-17 (12.1 vs. 6.6; F = 6.53, df = 1,45; p < .05) and BDI-13 (5.9 vs. 1.2; F = 5.73, df = 1,45; p < .05), and a greater percentage of fluoxetine-treated patients experienced a > or = 50% in HAM-D-17 scores (64% vs. 23%; chi2= 8.60, df = 1, p < .01). Differences were particularly apparent in subjects whose initial depressive episodes were rated as severe (i.e., HAM-D-17 score > or = 24). Severely depressed patients treated with fluoxetine had an endpoint CGI-I of 1.4 compared with an endpoint CGI-I of 2.7 for patients treated with placebo (F = 6.02, df = 1,11; p < .05). Further, side effects were generally mild and transient. The most frequently noted effects reported by subjects treated with fluoxetine were nausea, dry mouth, headache, and diarrhea, in decreasing order of frequency. CONCLUSION: This study supports the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine over and above group psychotherapy for the treatment of HIV-associated major depression.     

Magnetoreception attributed to the efficacy of light therapy

A group of specialized photoreceptors are suggested to amplify the weak interaction of the geomagnetic field with a single electron spin to the level of photon detection, resulting in a modulation of the response to light. Under exposure to rotating magnetic field, the size of pinealocytes is bigger at night than during the day in spring, but there is no day-night difference in autumn. Specialized photoreceptors are hypothesized to modulate the response of the photoreceptive system to light, and the pineal response to a magnetic stimulus, in patients with winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD). This could explain why some winter SAD patients show excessive sensitivity to light in winter.     

Dawn simulation treatment of abstinent alcoholics with winter depression

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that winter depression (seasonal affective disorder [SAD]) may be a subtype of affective disorder that is closely related to alcoholism. Dawn simulation has been shown in controlled trials to be effective in SAD. The present study examined the effectiveness of dawn simulation in abstinent alcoholics who met DSM-III-R criteria for major depression, or bipolar disorder, depressed with seasonal pattern. METHOD: All 12 subjects with winter depression had a history of either alcohol dependence or alcohol abuse according to DSM-III-R and had been abstinent from alcohol for at least 6 months. They also fulfilled criteria for SAD according to Rosenthal and were hypersomnic and drug free. After a 1-week baseline period, the subjects were randomly assigned to a 1-week treatment period at home with either a white 1.5-hour dawn from 4:30 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. peaking at 250 lux or a red 1.5-hour dawn from 4:30 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. peaking at 2 lux. The subjects were told that they would receive daily either a red or a white dawn reaching the same illuminance, an illuminance that would be much dimmer than standard bright light treatment. At the end of each week, the subjects were blindly assessed by a psychiatrist using the Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorder version (SIGH-SAD). RESULTS: For the 6 subjects completing the white dawn treatment, the mean SIGH-SAD score decreased from 33.0 at baseline to 15.8 after treatment. For the 6 subjects completing the dim red dawn treatment, the mean SIGH-SAD score decreased from 34.3 to 32.7. The mean post-dawn SIGH-SAD score was significantly lower after the white dawn treatment than after the dim red dawn treatment (ANCOVA with baseline SIGH-SAD as the covariate, F = 12.95, p < .01). Superiority of the white dawn was also found by analogous analyses for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) (p < .01) and the SAD Subscale (p < .05). CONCLUSION: The present study suggest that dawn simulation may be helpful in decreasing depression in abstinent alcoholics with SAD. Further study is necessary to confirm these preliminary findings and to determine whether dawn simulation might be helpful in preventing relapse in abstinent alcoholics who have SAD.     

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review of surgical indications and decision making

Patients with seasonal affective disorder were randomly assigned to treatment with light in the morning (9.00-12.00 a.m.; n = 16; ML) or evening (6.00-9.00 p.m.; n = 11; EL). An intensive 24-day assessment procedure revealed the same response rates: 57% for ML, 50% for EL. During the rest of the winter season a relatively low relapse rate of 54% was found. No differences between ML and EL were found in the time course of depressed mood or fatigue. A significant negative correlation was found between diurnal variation during baseline and therapeutic response: the larger the diurnal variation the less the response, indicating a potential negative predictive value for this symptom. There were no significant correlations between baseline fatigue or hypersomnia and response.