Regulatory role of nucleotides in axonemal function

In 46 female outpatients with android-type obesity, body mass index (BMI) 36.6 +/- 1.0, waist to hip ratio (WHR) > 0.86, and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) who were hypertensive at entry study [blood pressure (BP) > 140/90 mm Hg] and in 10 clinically healthy, nonobese, normotensive women, we evaluated the relationship between BMI, fat mass, WHR, fasting blood glucose, sum of blood glucose levels during oral glucose tolerance test and casual BP levels, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABP) parameters as the 24-hour mean, day-time mean, night-time mean and, by using a periodic model of cosine regression, MESOR (midline estimating statistic of rhythm), amplitude, acrophase, and baric impact. In android obese women, a negative correlation between ABP levels (day-/night-time, MESOR, and baric impact of systolic BP; night-time and MESOR of diastolic BP) and BMI has been documented. A positive correlation between systolic BP (casual, night-time mean, MESOR, amplitude, and baric impact), diastolic baric impact, and the WHR has been found. No correlation has been demonstrated between ABP monitoring parameters, and BMI, body fat, and WHR in the control group. Our data could suggest that, when enrolling obese subjects, it must be taken into account that obesity is a heterogeneous disorder. There are in fact obese subjects with normal or impaired glucose tolerance, as well as diabetics with moderate to severe obesity and with gynecoid or android-type obesity. In our android obese subjects with NGT, the WHR rather than the BMI was found to be a better predictor of hypertension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Epidemiology of extrapulmonary tuberculosis among persons with AIDS in the United States

We compared the antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily amlodipine (AM) versus nitrendipine (NTR) by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24-h ABPM) in 32 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (EH). After a 2-week single-blind, placebo run-in period, patients were randomized in a double-blind, parallel fashion: 14 received AM 5 mg and 18 NTR 10 mg. After 2 weeks, dose was adjusted if necessary (AM 10 mg or NTR 20 mg) and continued for another 6-week period. At the end of the placebo period and during the last week of treatment, patients underwent 24-h ABPM. Initial office BP mean values were similar in both groups (169.8 +/- 14/102.5 +/- 6 vs. 167.1 +/- 14/98.7 +/- 5 mm Hg, respectively, p = NS). A comparable decrease in office mean values of systolic BP (SBP, -22.3 +/- 13 vs. -19.1 +/- 16 mm Hg) and diastolic BP (DBP, -12.0 +/- 5 vs. -8.1 +/- 8 mm Hg) was observed. Nevertheless, 24-h ABPM mean values differed significantly between patients treated with AM or NTR with regard to 24-h SBP (120.0 +/- 10 vs. 132.5 +/- 1 mm Hg, p = 0.01). Moreover, the average decrease in 24-h SBP (-19.3 +/- 6 vs. -5.2 +/- 11 mm Hg, p = 0.0036) and 24-h DBP (-10.7 +/- 4 vs. -3.7 +/- 6 mm Hg, p = 0.0047) was higher in the AM group, with no changes in 24-h heart rate (HR). At equivalent once-daily dosage, AM was more effective than NTR in decreasing BP assessed by 24-h ABPM.     

Do geomagnetic disturbances of solar origin affect arterial blood pressure?

OBJECTIVE: Episodic reports suggest that geomagnetic disturbances of solar origin are associated with biological and clinical events, including increased arterial blood pressure (BP). We reassessed this aspect by relating solar activity levels to ambulatory BP measured in our out-patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ambulatory BP measurements of 447 consecutive untreated patients attending a hypertension out-patient clinic who did a monitoring for diagnostic purposes over 5 years were retrieved. The mean daytime, night-time and 24-h BP and heart rate values were related to the temporally corresponding geomagnetic index k-sum obtained by the nearest observatory. K-sum is a local measurement of the irregular disturbances of the geomagnetic field caused by solar particle radiation. RESULTS: Significant to highly significant positive correlations were observed for k-sum with systolic (daytime and 24 h) and diastolic BP (daytime, night-time and 24 h), but not with heart rate. No correlations were found with the k-sum of 1 or 2 days before the monitorings. Multiple correlations which also included other potential confounding factors (date, age) confirmed a significant effect of k-sum on BP. Comparison made in season-matched subgroups of quiet and disturbed days (using three different criteria of definition), always showed significantly higher values in the disturbed days for all BP parameters except systolic night-time pressure. The difference between the quietest and the most disturbed days was of about 6 to 8 mm Hg for 24-h systolic and diastolic BP. CONCLUSION: These results are unlikely to be due to unrelated secular trends, but seem to reflect a real relation between magnetic field disturbances and BP.     

White coat effect detected using self-monitoring of blood pressure at home: comparison with ambulatory blood pressure

The objective of the study was to investigate whether home blood pressure (HBP) is a reliable alternative to ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) for the detection of the white coat effect (WCE). Hypertensive patients were randomized to measure HBP for 2 weeks or ABP for 24 h. The alternative measurement was then performed. Clinic blood pressure (CBP) was measured in the beginning and end of the study. Subjects with a difference of > or = 20 mm Hg systolic or > or = 10 mm Hg diastolic BP between CBP and awake ABP or CBP and HBP, were classified as clinic reactors. A total of 189 patients completed the study (79 on stable antihypertensive treatment). There was no difference in the magnitude of WCE assessed using the ABP or the HBP method (mean discrepancy, systolic BP: -1.5 +/- 11.7 mm Hg, 95% CI -3.2, 0.2; diastolic BP: 0.9 +/- 7.0, 95% CI -0.1, 1.9). A strong association existed between WCE calculated using the HBP or the ABP method (r = 0.64/0.59 systolic/diastolic, P < .001). The proportion of patients classified as clinic reactors was identical using the HBP or the ABP method (25.9%). Agreement between methods in the classification of clinic reactors was found in 147 patients (78%). The sensitivity and specificity of the HBP method to classify correctly clinic reactors (ABP method used as the standard) were 57% and 85%, respectively, whereas its positive and negative predictive value were 57% and 85%. These results indicate that HBP is not appropriate as an alternative to ABP diagnostic testing in the detection of WCE. Nevertheless, HBP appears useful as a screening test for the detection of this phenomenon.     

Activation of amylin gene transcription by LIM domain homeobox gene isl-1

The main objective of the Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension (APTH) trial is to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive treatment based on ambulatory monitoring may be more beneficial than treatment guided by conventional sphygmomanometry. After a 2-month run-in period on single-blind placebo, hypertensive patients were randomized to two groups, one in which the target pressure was a sitting diastolic pressure from 80 through 89 mm Hg on conventional sphygmomanometry (conventional blood pressure [CBP] group), and one in which a daytime (from 10 to 20 h) diastolic pressure from 80 through 89 mm Hg had to be achieved (ambulatory blood pressure [ABP] group). After randomization all patients were started on lisinopril 10 mg/day. One month later lisinopril could be continued at 10 or 20 mg/day or discontinued depending on the attained blood pressure level. This article is an interim report on 207 patients followed for two months into the trial. At one month lisinopril was discontinued more frequently in the ABP than the CBP group (24 vs 9 patients, p = 0.004). Nevertheless at two months, blood pressure control was not significantly different in the two treatment groups. The baseline-adjusted differences in systolic pressure between the two treatment arms of the trial (ABP-CBP group) were +2.7 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]): -2.9, +8.3) for the conventional pressure, +0.4 mm Hg (CI: -4.3, +5.1) for the 24 h pressure, -0.1 mm Hg (CI: -5.1, +4.8) for the daytime pressure and -0.7 mm Hg (CI: -6.7, +5.4) for the night-time pressure. The corresponding differences in diastolic pressure were -1.3 mm Hg (CI: -4, +1.4), +0.1 mm Hg (CI: -3, +3.1), -1.1 mmgH (CI: -4.4, +2.1) and +0.3 mm Hg (CI: -3.7, +4.3), respectively. Thus, the present findings do not refute the APTH research hypothesis. In terms of blood pressure control and the number of patients remaining on antihypertensive drugs, treatment based on ambulatory recordings may be preferable to treatment guided by conventional sphygmomanometry.     

Antihypertensive effects of combined lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with systodiastolic or systolic hypertension: results of a multicenter trial

This study was aimed at evaluating the antihypertensive effect of lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide administered in the fixed combination of 20 and 12.5 mg, respectively, on clinic and 24-h blood pressure in elderly patients (age, 68.8 +/- 5.8 years, mean +/- SD) with mild-to-moderate essential systodiastolic or isolated systolic hypertension. After a washout period of 4 weeks, patients received once daily lisinopril combined with hydrochlorothiazide for a 6-week period. At the end of the washout and treatment periods, clinic blood pressure was assessed 24 h after dosing, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was monitored, taking blood pressure readings every 15 min. Pretreatment clinic blood pressure was 171.3 +/- 14.0/103.7 +/- 5.1 mm Hg (systolic/diastolic) in the group with systodiastolic hypertension (n = 405) and 179.6 +/- 9.4/83.6 +/- 5.4 mm Hg in the group with isolated systolic hypertension (n = 165). The corresponding 24-h average blood pressures were 144.1 +/- 13.9/88.7 +/- 8.4 mm Hg (n = 114) and 150.7 +/- 15.5/80.8 +/- 9.4 mm Hg (n = 40). Clinic blood pressure was significantly reduced by treatment in both groups. This was the case also for ambulatory blood pressure, which was reduced by 9.6 +/- 0.9%/9.9 +/- 0.9% in systodiastolic and by 11.8 +/- 1.3%/8.5 +/- 1.5% in isolated patients with systolic hypertension (p < 0.05 at least for all differences). The antihypertensive effect was similar in patients older and younger than 70 years. In all groups, it was manifest both during the day and the nighttime and was still significant after 24 h. Thus single daily administration of combined lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide effectively reduces blood pressure in elderly patients with hypertension.     

Pain description and severity of chronic orofacial pain conditions

The Finapres non-invasive blood pressure (BP) monitor uses the method of Penaz to indirectly record the arterial waveform; studies on its accuracy have suggested little systematic bias vs intra-arterial pressure (IAP) but substantial variability. Inconsistency between studies, in respect of the magnitude, direction and variance of bias, was described in the validation studies against the direct IAP. We have employed a novel re-sampling statistical method to combine the data from 20 published studies; a robust overall estimate of the accuracy and precision of the Finapres was thereby obtained. Based on 449 patients and 4490 re-samples, the average Finapres systolic bias (IAP- Finapres) was 2.2 mm Hg (s.d.+/-12.4) with limits of agreement (bias+/-2 s.d.) of -22.6 and 26.9 mm Hg. The average precision was 12.1 mm Hg (s.d.+/-8.4). The Finapres diastolic bias was -0.3 mm Hg (s.d.+/-7.9) with the limits of agreement of -16.1 and 15.5 mm Hg. The average precision was 7.6 mm Hg (s.d.+/-5.3). The average Finapres mean arterial pressure bias was 2.1 mm Hg (s.d.+/-8.6) with precision of 7.6 mm Hg (s.d.+/-5.3). The calculated percentage of Finapres systolic values expected to fall within +/-5 or +/-10 of the direct intra-arterial pressure was 35.9% and 73.1%, respectively. The calculated precision of the Finapres systolic pressure between 0-5 mm Hg was 1.6% and between 0-10 mm Hg 36.4%. The comparable values for Finapres diastolic BP for accuracy were 63.5% and 92.8% and for precision 23.1% and 79.2%. The Finapres device can provide an accurate estimate of diastolic and mean arterial pressure compared with the intra-arterial record; the apparent inaccuracy of the Finapres systolic pressure may have a physiological explanation. When the Finapres device is used in experimental or in clinical situations, then calibration against a reliable reference arterial pressure is desirable to obviate the possibility of an 'offset' error.     

Development of a statistical model for the formation of poly [acryloyl hydroxyethyl starch] microspheres

Approximately 1 in 4 patients with systemic hypertension have a 24-hour blood pressure (BP) profile characterized by a blunted or absent nocturnal decline in pressure. We evaluated the effects of a chronotherapeutic delivery system of controlled-onset extended-release (COER) verapamil hydrochloride and placebo in 257 hypertensive patients according to their circadian BP pattern in an 8-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, and double-blind clinical trial. Patients were stratified into 193 dippers (>10% decline in BP during the period of 10 P.M. to 5 A.M. compared with the hours of 5 A.M. to 10 P.M.) and 64 nondippers (<10% decline in BP during nighttime). During daytime, placebo-subtracted BP was similarly decreased in dippers and nondippers by COER verapamil. During nighttime, the placebo increased nocturnal BP in dippers (baseline nocturnal BP, 133/78 mm Hg) by 3/3 +/- 2/2 mm Hg and reduced BP by -5/-3 +/- 2/2 mm Hg in nondippers (baseline nocturnal BP, 152/94 mm Hg) (p = NS between groups). After controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and the regression to the mean observed on placebo for all doses, COER verapamil reduced nocturnal BP more in nondippers than dippers -5.8/-2.4 mm Hg, p <0.0001 for systolic BP and p = 0.09 for diastolic BP). Additionally, a significant dose-related reduction in systolic and diastolic nocturnal BP (r = 0.56, p <0.0001 for systolic BP and r = 0.62, p <0.0001 for diastolic BP) was observed with COER verapamil after controlling for baseline covariates. These data demonstrate that nocturnal BP is decreased by a greater extent in nondipper hypertensives than in dipper hypertensives following treatment with COER verapamil HCL.     

Comparative accuracy of three automated techniques in the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure in men

Automated devices have regularly replaced manual sphygmomanometry for the determination of blood pressure not only in homes and clinics, but also in emergency and critical care settings. Few studies exist that correctly assess the accuracy of these devices, and even fewer that specifically compare commercially available units that rely on different physiologic events for measurement. Six hundred pressure measurements were obtained from 120 subjects using 1 of 3 randomly selected blood pressure monitors. In addition, central arterial pressure measurements were obtained simultaneously and directly from the ascending aorta of each subject. Overall, these devices tended to overestimate diastolic (+2.5 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) and mean (+3.8 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) pressures, but not systolic (+0.7 mm Hg, p = NS) pressure. Compared with the other 2 devices, device I, relying on oscillometric detection, demonstrated a significantly smaller mean absolute error for diastolic pressure (4.9 +/- 3.0 vs 7.0 +/- 4.8 and 6.2 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, p < 0.0001) and mean pressure (4.0 +/- 3.2 vs 7.8 +/- 5.9 and 8.6 +/- 7.5 mm Hg, p < 0.0001), and a trend toward smaller error with systolic pressure (6.8 +/- 6.5 vs 7.3 +/- 6.8 and 8.0 +/-5.6 mm Hg, p = 0.19). Clinically significant (+/-10 mm Hg) errors were common with each device (24.8% overall), but serious (+/-20 mm Hg) errors were unusual (3.2%) and did not occur at all with device I during diastolic and mean pressure measurement. All of the devices tested could be expected to perform satisfactorily in most clinical settings provided that an average error of 4.0 to 8.6 mm Hg is tolerable. This level of accuracy typically extended throughout the range of pressures anticipated in most noncritical clinical situations. As implemented in the devices tested, noninvasive measurement by oscillometry with stepped deflation is more accurate than automated auscultation.     

Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring in healthy, middle-aged smokeless tobacco users, smokers, and nontobacco users

Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring was conducted in 135 healthy, normotensive, middle-aged (35 to 60 years) men, with no antihypertensive medication, to study the influence of habitual smokeless tobacco use (n = 47) and smoking (n = 29) on diurnal blood pressure and heart rate. Comparisons were made with nonusers of tobacco (n = 59). Adjustments were made for differences in age, body mass index, waist-hip ratio, physical fitness, and alcohol intake. Daytime ambulatory heart rates were significantly (P < .05) elevated in both smokeless tobacco users and smokers compared with nonusers (69 +/- 14 and 74 +/- 13 beats/min, respectively, versus 63 +/- 12 beats/min). In subjects > or = 45 years old, ambulatory daytime diastolic blood pressures were significantly elevated, on average by 5 mm Hg, in both smokeless tobacco users and smokers (P < .001) compared with nonusers. Clinical measurements of heart rate and systolic blood pressure in smokers were significantly lower compared with the ambulatory mean values. Nighttime measurements showed only minor differences between the tobacco habit groups. The higher heart rates and blood pressures noted during the daytime in smokers and smokeless tobacco users were most likely due to the effects of nicotine. A strong positive relationship was found between cotinine (major nicotine metabolite) and blood pressure in smokeless tobacco users (systolic blood pressure, r = 0.48, P < .001; diastolic blood pressure, r = 0.41, P = .005), whereas an inverse relationship was found in smokers (systolic blood pressure, r = -0.12, P = .47; diastolic blood pressure, r = -0.03, P = .84), indicating additional and more complex influences on vascular tone in smokers than the influence of nicotine in smokeless tobacco users.     

Low dosages of felodipine ER once daily as monotherapy in elderly hypertensive patients: effect on ambulatory blood pressure and quality of life

OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy of 24-h ambulatory and casual blood pressure (BP) reduction, and the tolerability of once daily felodipine extended release (ER) 2.5 mg and felodipine ER 5 mg as monotherapy. DESIGN: Randomised, double-blind placebo controlled 6 weeks parallel study. SETTING: From 15 general practices centres (with 19 GPs) in the region of the University of Maastricht, The Netherlands. SUBJECTS: A total of 129 subjects aged 50-80 years with primary hypertension were screened; 27 men and 61 women with a casual diastolic BP of 100-115 mm Hg and/or a systolic BP of less than 200 mm Hg entered the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Casual and 24-h ambulatory BP and a subjective symptom assessment (SSA) questionnaire after 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: After correlation for placebo response the mean casual systolic/diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) reduction was 10/5 mm Hg (NS) and 12/10 mm Hg (P < 0.05) for felodipine ER 2.5 and 5 mg, respectively. By using 24-h ambulatory BP measurements these reduction were 6/4 mm Hg (NS) and 13/8 mm Hg (P < 0.05), respectively. No significant difference for SBP and DBP was found during the night time between felodipine 2.5 and placebo (-1/0). Felodipine ER 5 mg lowered the BP load significantly during both daytime and night time but felodipine ER 2.5 mg only for DBP during the daytime. There was a significant difference for the number of responders between placebo (28%) vs felodipine ER 2.5 mg (55%) and ER 5.0 mg (59%). Both felodipine dosages and placebo were comparable in (a low) number of adverse events and results of the SSA. CONCLUSIONS: During daytime felodipine ER 2.5 mg and 5 mg are effective in BP lowering in elderly hypertensive patients. However, only felodipine ER mg is effective in reducing BP during night time (22.00-7.00). Only felodipine ER 5 mg has a significant reducing effect on BP load during day and night time. Both felodipine ER 2.5 and ER 5.0 have a significant effect on the responder rate. It appeared from this study that compared to placebo, and in contrast with felodipine ER 5 mg, the ER form of felodipine 2.5 mg has no BP lowering effect during night time in elderly patients. To assess the effectivity during night time of felodipine ER 2.5 mg in an individual patient it is recommendable to measure the BP at the end of the dose interval.     

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring during pregnancy. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometry

There is little information concerning the relationship between blood pressures obtained by standard mercury sphygmomanometry and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in pregnancy. We compared readings obtained with these two methods using an Hawksley random zero mercury sphygmomanometer and an Accutracker II ABPM device. Blood pressures were compared over 90 min with the pregnant woman seated and, in a separate study, over 30 min during standing and ambulation. When pregnant women were seated, the ABPM overestimated the systolic blood pressure (BP) by 5 (3,6) mm Hg (mean, 95% confidence limits) (P < .001) and underestimated diastolic phase IV readings by 7 (-9, -6) mm Hg (P < .001) and phase V readings by 3 (-5, -1) mm Hg (P < .01). Eighty-three percent of systolic readings agreed within 10 mm Hg. Seventy-six percent of diastolic phase V (but only 45% of phase IV) readings agreed within 6 mm Hg. When pregnant women were ambulatory, the ABPM overestimated systolic BP by 7 (4,10) mm Hg (P < .001) and underestimated diastolic phase IV readings by 6 (-8, -4) mm Hg (P < .001) and phase V readings by 4 (-6, -2) mm Hg (P < .01). Eighty percent of systolic readings agreed within 10 mm Hg. Fifty-five percent of diastolic phase V and 50% of diastolic phase IV readings agreed within 6 mm Hg. The Accutracker II blood pressure readings are reasonably comparable to those of mercury sphygmomanometry in pregnant women, particularly when assessing group data.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Phasic changes in human right coronary blood flow before and after repair of aortic insufficiency

We have shown previously that acute aortic insufficiency in chronically instrumented dogs reverses the normally high ratio of diastolic to systolic coronary blood flow. Phasic blood flow in the dominant right coronary artery was measured directly with an electromagnetic flow meter during surgery in eight patients with severe aortic insufficiency before and after relacement of the aortic valve. Before the insufficiency was eliminated, right coronary flow average 116 +/- 37 ml./minute and the diastolic to systolic flow ratio was 0.88 +/- 17. Mean arterial blood pressure averaged 106 +/- 17 mm. Hg, heart rate 84 +/- 19 beats/minute, and mean diastolic pressure averaged 67 +/- 10 mm. Hg. After the aortic valve was replaced with an average heart rate of 90 +/- 15 and mean blood pressure of 103 +/- 13 mm. Hg, the average right coronary blood flow increased to 180 +/- 40 ml./minute with a D/S ratio of 2.18 +/- 0.8. In all cases the right coronary blood flow increased after the aortic insufficiency was eliminated surgically. Right coronary flow probably increased because of the improved diastolic perfusion pressure and the change from predominantly systolic to diastolic coronary flow.     

A case report of two siblings with familial leukoencephalopathy in normotensive male adults with alopecia and lumbago

The aim of the study was to examine the hypotensive efficacy and tolerance of bisoprolol in elderly patients. Sixty patients (40 <65 years and 20 >65 years) with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension (diastolic blood pressure (DBP) between 95 and 109 mm Hg) were included in the study. After a 2-week run-in period on placebo, patients began bisoprolol therapy (5 mg/d) for 12 weeks. After 4 weeks the dose was increased to 10 mg/d in those with a DBP > or =95 mm Hg. Additionally, in 10 patients over 65 years old, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed, after placebo and after bisoprolol (5 mg) administration. The hypotensive efficacy of bisoprolol in the elderly and younger patients was similar. Before and after treatment the mean difference of systolic BP (SBP) was 19.6 +/- 12.5 mm Hg and DBP 9.6 +/- 6.2 mm Hg in the younger patients and 16.1 +/- 13.6 mmHg and 9.5 +/- 6.0 mmHg in the elderly patients. Bisoprolol produced a similar reduction in heart rate (23.1% vs 17.1%) in the estimated groups. The tolerance of bisoprolol was good in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse drug reactions between the groups.     

Nocturnal blood pressure elevation in patients with type 1 diabetes receiving intensive insulin therapy compared with that in patients receiving conventional insulin therapy

Studies have shown that type 1 diabetic patients may suffer from nocturnal elevation in blood pressure and that this elevation may be related to hyperinsulinemia. In this study we tested the hypothesis that tight type 1 diabetes control, which is usually accompanied by hyperinsulinemia and subclinical nocturnal hypoglycemia, may result in a higher rise in nocturnal blood pressure compared with conventional type 1 diabetes control. Eighteen patients treated with intensive insulin therapy (multiple daily injections; IIT) were compared with 18 patients treated with conventional insulin regimens (twice daily injections of regular and intermediate acting insulin; CIT). Both groups were matched for age, sex, duration of diabetes, body weight, body mass index, baseline daytime blood pressure, and microalbuminuria levels. Hemoglobin A1c was lower in the IIT group compared with that in the CIT group (8.1 +/- 1.2% vs. 11.0 +/- 3.2%; P < 0.01). The amount of insulin/body weight (units per kg) was higher in the IIT group than that in the CIT group (1.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.7 +/- 0.2 U/kg; P < 0.05). In all patients, a 24-h ambulatory blood pressure was recorded. The nocturnal diastolic blood pressure was higher in the IIT group (66 +/- 9 mm Hg) than in the CIT group (55 +/- 4 mm Hg; P < 0.01). The nocturnal decline in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure was lower in the IIT group (7 +/- 5 and 6 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively) compared with that in the CIT group (13 +/- 6 and 16 +/- 6 mm Hg, respectively; P < 0.01). The nocturnal heart rate was higher in IIT group than in the CIT group (81 +/- 12 vs. 67 +/- 9/min; P < 0.05). These findings show that the intensive insulin therapy regimen may have a more deleterious effect than the conventional insulin therapy regimen on the nocturnal blood pressure of patients with type 1 diabetes.     

HPLC fractionated soluble egg antigen from Schistosoma mansoni elicits a heterogeneous human immune response

Antihypertensive effects of beni-koji were studied using 29 outpatients with mild hypertension in a placebo-controlled double-blind comparative fashion. After a 4-week vehicle (apple juice) run-in period, 13 patients were assigned to receive beni-koji aqueous extracts containing juice once daily (27 g of beni-koji eq. per day) for 8 weeks and 16 were assigned to vehicle. Two patients assigned to the vehicle group did not complete the study. In addition to casual blood pressure, 24-hr non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was monitored in 6 patients given the beni-koji drink and 5 patients given the vehicle. 1) In the beni-koji group, both casual systolic and diastolic pressure decreased significantly during the treatment period (from 150 +/- 10/96 +/- 6 mmHg to 140 +/- 10/89 +/- 10 mmHg, p < 0.01). The averages of the 24-hr blood pressure recorded in ABP (24-BP) also significantly decreased (from 141 +/- 17/95 +/- 13 mmHg to 132 +/- 21/86 +/- 10 mmHg, p < 0.05) when compared with those of the control period. Casual pressure normalized (less than 140/90 mmHg) in 4 patients who received beni-koji. Circadian variation of the blood pressure by ABP showed a significant decrease during the daytime. 2) In the vehicle group, casual systolic pressure did not change significantly (from 155 +/- 8 mmHg to 151 +/- 12 mmHg), but diastolic pressure decreased significantly (98 +/- 7 mmHg to 93 +/- 6 mmHg). Casual blood pressure did not normalize in any of the patients and 24-BP did not change significantly. 3) Summative evaluation of safety showed that no problems appeared in the beni-koji group. In conclusion, beni-koji appears to be an effective and safe food material for mild essential hypertension. The mechanism of the antihypertensive effect of beni-koji still remains to be investigated.     

The hypertension of autonomic failure and its treatment

We studied the incidence and severity of supine hypertension in 117 patients with severe primary autonomic failure presenting to a referral center over a 9-year period. Patients were uniformly characterized by disabling orthostatic hypotension, lack of compensatory heart rate increase, abnormal autonomic function tests, and unresponsive plasma norepinephrine. Fifty-four patients had isolated autonomic impairment (pure autonomic failure). Sixty-three patients had central nervous system involvement in addition to autonomic impairment (multiple-system atrophy). Patients were studied off medications, in a metabolic ward, and on a controlled diet containing 150 mEq of sodium. Fifty-six percent of patients had supine diastolic blood pressure > or =90 mm Hg. The prevalence of hypertension was slightly greater in females (63%) than in males (52%). Potential mechanisms responsible for this hypertension were investigated. No correlation was found between blood volume and blood pressure. Similarly, plasma norepinephrine (92+/-15 pg/mL) and plasma renin activity (0.3+/-0.05 ng/mL per hour) were very low in the subset of patients with pure autonomic failure and supine hypertension (mean systolic/diastolic pressure, 177 +/- 6/108 +/- 2 mm Hg, range 167/97 to 219/121). Supine hypertension represents a challenge in the treatment of orthostatic hypotension. We found these patients to be particularly responsive to the hypotensive effects of transdermal nitroglycerin. Doses ranging from 0.025 to 0.1 mg/h decreased systolic blood pressure by 36+/-7 mm Hg and may effectively treat supine hypertension overnight, but the dose should be individualized and used with caution.     

Diurnal blood pressure patterns in normotensive and hypertensive children and adolescents

As abnormalities in diurnal ambulatory blood pressure (BP) have been associated with hypertensive target organ damage in adults, we investigated the diurnal systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) patterns of 54 normotensive children, age 13.4 +/- 3.0 years, and 45 untreated borderline and mildly hypertensive children, age 14.4 +/- 2.6 years. Subjects wore the SpaceLabs 90207 ambulatory BP monitor for 24 h. BP was measured q 15 min from 08.00-21.00 h then q 30 min from 21.00-08.00 h. Nocturnal BP fall, the night-day ratio and cusum derived measures were calculated from time-weighted daytime and night-time SBP and DBP. The groups were compared using analysis of covariance with adjustment for age, race, gender and body mass index. The influence of age, gender and race on the diurnal BP profile was also examined. Nocturnal SBP fall was greater in hypertensive compared to normotensive subjects (17.1 +/- 6.7 vs 14.6 +/- 7.1 mm Hg; unadjusted mean +/- s.d., P = 0.022). Normotensive and hypertensive groups did not differ in nocturnal DBP fall or SBP or DBP night-day ratio. Race appeared to influence the diurnal BP pattern as black subjects had less nocturnal SBP fall (12.9 +/- 6.9 vs 17.1 +/- 6.5 mm Hg; P < 0.005) and a higher night-day SBP ratio (90.1 +/- 5.3 vs 86.7 +/- 4.6%; P < 0.005) than white subjects. In conclusion, hypertensive children and adolescents have a similar diurnal BP pattern as their normotensive counterparts, except that the entire BP profile is shifted upward with a greater absolute fall in SBP at night. Race also appears to influence the diurnal BP profile of normotensive and hypertensive children and adolescents.     

Modifiable stroke risk factors in volunteers willing to participate in a prevention program

The current trends in stroke incidence require continued efforts to improve primary prevention. Compared to large-scale public health approaches, more limited programs targeting volunteers may offer some advantages. We invited all 12,824 members of a health insurance company program who lived within 50 km form one of two study sites to participate in a vascular screening program and aimed at reducing modifiable risk factors. 1,837 persons registered and participated (14.3%, mean age 53 +/- 12 years, 50% men). Using the Framingham stroke risk profile for persons aged 55 years or above (n = 961, 52.3%), 97 stroke events can be predicted for this age group within 10 years. The majority of these 97 events will occur in those with men resting blood pressure values +/- 140mm Hg (systolic) or +/- 90 mm Hg (diastolic; 420 persons, mean age 64 +/- 7 years, 60 expected events), or with a particularly high age- and sex-adjusted risk (288 persons, mean age 68 +/- 7 years, 60 expected events). Our pilot study provides an estimate of the prevalence of modifiable vascular risk factor among volunteer participants of a prevention program. Possible benefits of this approach will be investigated in a second step using a randomized intervention.     

Repair of coarctation of the aorta in adults: the fate of systolic hypertension

BACKGROUND: The benefit of coarctation repair in adults has been questioned by suggesting that hypertension may not be relieved by the operation and that surgical intervention may have no impact on the natural history of the disease. METHODS: To delineate the impact of surgical intervention on systolic hypertension, we conducted a retrospective review of 26 adults with a mean age of 32 +/- 10 years who underwent coarctation repair between 1987 and 1993. All patients were hypertensive (mean systolic blood pressure, 174 +/- 21 mm Hg; range, 140 to 220 mm Hg), and 18 patients (69%) were on a regimen of at least one hypertensive medication at the time of surgical admission. All patients underwent catheterization, and the mean peak systolic gradient across the coarctation was 61 +/- 25 mm Hg (range, 25 to 120 mm Hg). Operation included resection and end-to-end anastomosis (3 patients), resection with an interposition tube graft (6 patients), a bypass graft (11 patients), and patch angioplasty (6 patients). There was no hospital mortality or late morbidity. RESULTS: Intermediate follow-up was available at a mean of 2.3 +/- 2 years (range, 1 to 7 years). At last follow-up, the peak systolic gradient between the upper and lower body was trivial (< or = 10 mm Hg) in 23 patients (88%) and mild (11 to 20 mm Hg) in 3 (12%). All patients had significant improvement in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001) compared to preoperative values, and the majority (23, 88%) were normotensive. More than half of the patients (14, 54%) were still on a regimen of antihypertensive medication at last follow-up, with a trend (p = 0.06) toward older patients requiring medication. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of coarctation in adults is an effective, low-risk procedure, which results in a significant improvement in systolic hypertension and a decreased requirement of antihypertensive medications.