New one-week, low-dose triple therapy for the treatment of duodenal ulcer with Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial therapy is the recommended treatment for duodenal ulcer associated with Helicobacter pylori infection. The eradication of bismuth-based triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole and amoxicillin is limited by low compliance, drug resistance and side-effects. Two-week proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy has a higher eradication rate but is costly. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, patient compliance and cost of short-term PPI-based triple therapy with those of bismuth-based triple therapy. METHODS: Ninety patients with active duodenal ulcer disease and H pylori infection, proven with the 13C-urea breath test and CLO test (Campylobacter-like organism test) were treated randomly in three therapeutic groups: Group A, DeNol 120 mg, amoxicillin 500 mg and metronidazole 250 mg four times a day orally for 14 days; Group B, omeprazole 20 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day and amoxicillin 500 mg four times a day for 14 days; Group C, omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice a day for seven days. Nizatidine 150 mg twice a day was given continuously following the end of anti-H pylori therapy for each group. Two months later, endoscopy, the CLO test and 13C-urea breath test were repeated to assess the eradication rate of H pylori and the ulcer-healing rate. Drug tolerance was evaluated by patients themselves by daily recording of any side-effects. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients completed the entire course of therapy and evaluation for H pylori infection. The H pylori eradication rates in Groups A, B and C were 75% (21/28), 93% (26/28) and 89% (25/28), respectively (p = 0.466). The ulcer healing rate was 86% (24/28) in Group A and 89% (25/28) in Groups B and C (p = 0.764). A total of 74 patients (88%) were free from symptoms at the end of the triple therapy. Symptom relief was faster in patients with PPI-based triple therapy (Groups B and C) (days 3 and 4) than for patients with bismuth-based triple therapy (day 5). The cost of Group C therapy was lower than that for Groups A and B. There were no major side-effects in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy with omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole is highly effected for the eradication of H pylori. A therapeutic regime of one week's duration with lower cost, good compliance and mild side-effects may offer a good choice for treatment of duodenal ulcer associated with H pylori infection in clinical practice.     

CT in Fournier''s gangrene

BACKGROUND: Few outcome studies directly compare Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with maintenance H2-antagonist therapy in duodenal ulcer disease. AIM: To examine prospectively the efficacy of H. pylori eradication therapy with ranitidine maintenance therapy over 1 year in patients with confirmed chronic duodenal ulcer. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with active H. pylori infection were randomized to receive ranitidine, 150 mg/day initially (58 patients), or omeprazole, 40 mg/day, amoxycillin 2 g/day and metronidazole 1.2 g/day for 14 days, or omeprazole 40 mg/day and clarithromycin 1.5 g/day, for 14 days (if penicillin-allergic). Symptoms were assessed using the Gastrointestinal System Rating Scale (GSRS) and SF36 quality of life index. RESULTS: 13C urea breath testing confirmed overall treatment success in 100% of patients (58/58) per protocol and 95.1% (58/61) on an intention-to-treat basis. At 4 and 12 months there were no differences in any GSRS symptoms between treatment groups. SF36 analysis showed a perceived health improvement at 4 and 12 months in patients who received H. pylori eradication. However, despite successful H. pylori eradication, one-fifth of patients still required antisecretory therapy. CONCLUSION: Following successful H. pylori eradication, chronic duodenal ulcer patients were at least as well symptomatically as when taking maintenance ranitidine. They perceived that their health had improved, but a subgroup was still acid-suppression dependent.     

Twice-daily, 10-day triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease: results of three multicenter, double-blind, United States trials

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the safety and efficacy of 10-day twice-daily triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in three double-blind, controlled trials in patients with duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with one or more duodenal ulcer(s) at endoscopy (studies 1, 2) or with a documented duodenal ulcer history and no duodenal ulcer or erosions at endoscopy (study 3) were randomly assigned to 10-day courses of omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (OAC) or placebo plus amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. plus clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (AC). In studies 1 and 2, patients received an additional 18 days of omeprazole 20 mg q.d. (OAC group) or placebo (AC group). Endoscopy was repeated 4 wk after therapy in studies 1 and 2 and 4-6 wk after therapy in study 3. At baseline, H. pylori was diagnosed by CLOtest plus histology, or by culture. Eradication was defined as no positive biopsy test and two or more negative tests. Patients were defined as compliant if they took 75% or more of each study drug and missed < or = 3 consecutive days of the 10-day therapy. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat populations of the three studies combined were 241 patients for OAC and 266 for AC. Of all OAC patients combined, 2% stopped study medications due to adverse events, and 93% were compliant. Per-protocol cure rates were 78% to 90% (all studies combined, 84%) for OAC vs 33% to 45% (combined, 39%) for AC (p < 0.001, OAC vs AC); intent-to-treat eradication rates were 69% to 83% (combined, 75%) for OAC vs 32% to 37% (combined, 35%) for AC; (p < 0.001, OAC vs AC). CONCLUSION: Rigorously designed studies indicate that 10 days of twice-daily triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin achieves per-protocol eradication rates of approximately 80% to 90% in the U.S.     

Short-term low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection in duodenal ulcer patients

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection has been achieved using various therapy regimens, but the efficacy of the proton-pump inhibitor pantoprazole as part of these regimens has not yet been widely tested. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 1-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori-positive duodenal ulcer. METHODS: In an open single-centre prospective study, 71 patients with endoscopically proven active duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection received pantoprazole 40 mg o.m. for 4 weeks, and during the first week a combination antimicrobial treatment comprising tinidazole 500 mg b.d. plus clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. H. pylori eradication was defined as concordant negative histology and rapid urease test performed at endoscopy 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment, confirmed 4 weeks later by 13C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (93%) completed the trial and five patients were lost to follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured in 61 out of the 66 patients who completed the trial (per-protocol analysis: 92.4%, 95% CI: 83.2-97.5%; intention-to-treat analysis: 85.9%, 95% CI: 75.7-93.0%). At final endoscopy, 65 out of 66 patients had healed ulcer (98.5%). Mild adverse events occurred in six patients (9.1%). CONCLUSIONS: One-week low-dose pantoprazole-based triple therapy is a simple, effective and well-tolerated regimen for ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

Acid suppression with ranitidine plus oral triple therapy improves ulcer healing but not Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate whether the addition of 2 weeks of ranitidine to a 1-week oral triple therapy (OTT) regimen improved ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication. METHODOLOGY: Two hundred and eleven consecutive patients with an endoscopic diagnosis of active duodenal ulcer (DU) and a positive antrum biopsy for H. pylori were enrolled. Those attending the Hospital Vera Cruz (Group A, n=142) received a 14-day course of ranitidine (150 mg after breakfast and dinner) plus a 1-week OTT, consisting of bismuth subcitrate, (240 mg after the 3 meals), tetracycline (500 mg, 10 min before the three meals and at bedtime), and furazolidone (200 mg after breakfast and dinner). Patients from the Hospital das Clinicas (Group B, n=69) received the same OTT as Group A but without ranitidine. Patients underwent endoscopy again on average 40 days (range: 30-60 days) after completing therapy in order to assess ulcer healing and H. pylori status. RESULTS: Both schedules were equally efficient in eradicating H. pylori with 90% (128/142) eradication in group A, and 84% (58/69) in group B (p=0.2). In contrast, the addition of ranitidine to OTT improved ulcer healing when compared with OTT alone (96%, 137/142, vs. 70%, 48/69; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the association of acid suppression, obtained with 2 week ranitidine administration with OTT improved ulcer healing but did not enhance H. pylori eradication.     

One-week use of ranitidine bismuth citrate, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori-related duodenal ulcer

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have been widely used in combination with amoxycillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. AIM: To study the effects of 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based triple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. METHOD: Patients with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori infection were prospectively randomized to receive either RBC with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (RAC), or omeprazole with amoxycillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (OAC). No additional ulcer healing drug was used after the 1-week medication. Patients were assessed for H. pylori eradication, ulcer healing and side-effects after receiving the therapies. RESULTS: One hundred consecutive patients were recruited to this study, with 50 patients randomized to each treatment group. In the intention-to-treat analysis, duodenal ulcers were completely healed in 45 (90%) patients in the RAC group and 43 (89.6%) in the OAC group (P = 1.0). H. pylori eradication was confirmed in 47 (94%) in the RAC group and 42 (87.5%) in the OAC group (P = 0.31). There was no significant difference in the severity of side-effects experienced by the two treatment groups. CONCLUSION: One-week RBC-based triple therapy is an effective treatment for H. pylori-related duodenal ulcers. The therapeutic effects are comparable to a 1-week course of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy.     

Triple therapy with sucralfate is not effective in eradicating Helicobacter pylori and does not reduce duodenal ulcer relapse rates

OBJECTIVES: The most used therapeutic schedule to eradicate Helicobacter pylori is the "triple therapy," which is based on the simultaneous use of a bismuth salt and two antibiotics. Sucralfate, a basic aluminum salt of sucrose sulfate, is supposed to have an antibacterial activity and is said to reduce the bacterial density of H. pylori. This randomized, prospective clinical trial compares the efficacy of an alternative oral triple therapy consisting of sucralfate, tinidazol, and tetracycline with a conventional therapy using ranitidine, with respect to H. pylori eradication and duodenal ulcer healing and recurrence in a 12-month follow-up. METHODS: Forty-three patients with active duodenal ulcers diagnosed at endoscopy were enrolled to receive either 1 g of sucralfate four times daily for 30 days, 500 mg of tetracycline four times daily, and 500 mg of tinidazol three times daily, for 10 days (group A; n = 23) or 150 mg of ranitidine twice daily for 30 days (group B; n = 20). The groups were age- and sex-matched and balanced for tobacco use and H. pylori status. Compliance assessed by post-treatment interviews was considered high (all patients declared that they had ingested at least 80% of the drugs). RESULTS: Both therapies were efficient in healing ulcers (group A, 95%; group B, 90%), the relapse rates were high in both groups (group A, 77%; group B, 89%), and the alternative triple therapy eradicated H. pylori in only 4% of the patients. CONCLUSION: Alternative oral triple therapy presented no significant advantage over ranitidine treatment of active ulcer disease.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication and ulcer healing with daily lansoprazole, plus 1 or 2 weeks co-therapy with amoxycillin and clarithromycin

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor based combination therapy is one standard strategy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To compare the eradication and duodenal ulcer healing efficacy of two 2-week, single dose, lansoprazole based combination therapies. METHODS: Healthy adult patients with endoscopically confirmed, H. pylori associated duodenal ulcer disease (3 mm > ulcer < 20 mm) were eligible for the study. All patients received a 14 day course of lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., and were randomized to receive either 7 or 14 days of amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. Patients were endoscoped at entry and 14-17 days later. Symptomatic, unhealed patients received a further 14 days of therapy with lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. Eradication was confirmed a minimum of 28 days after cessation of all therapy by urease reaction and histological assessment of gastric body and antral biopsies (three biopsies each site). RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to a treatment arm, of which 58 could be included in an intention-to-treat and key-point-available analysis. H. pylori eradication rates were identical, at 93% (95% CI: 73-98% (1 week), 78-99% (2 week)). In the combined group, all but 13 ulcers were healed at 2 weeks; six required further therapy because of symptoms, while six of the seven asymptomatic patients went on to heal. CONCLUSION: An eradication regimen, based on a 2-week course of single dose lansoprazole with 1 week of antibiotic co-therapy, is effective in eradicating H. pylori, while the 2 weeks of acid suppression is usually effective in duodenal ulcer healing.     

Improvement of glucose/insulin metabolism reduces hypertension in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus recipients of kidney-pancreas transplantation

OBJECTIVE: The current guidelines recommend 1-wk triple therapy regimens for eradicating H. pylori infection. Until now, shorter regimens have scarcely been investigated. Azithromycin is a new generation macrolide antibiotic with unusual and favorable pharmacokinetics, and seems to be a very promising agent for innovative anti-H. pylori regimens. We assessed the efficacy and tolerability of a new 4-day low dose triple therapy in comparison with a well established 1-wk triple therapy in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred-sixty consecutive patients with biopsy-proven H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. on days 1-4, azithromycin 500 mg u.i.d. on days 2-4, and tinidazole 2000 mg u.i.d. on day 3 (LAT group), or 7 days of triple therapy of omeprazole 20 mg u.i.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.i.d., and tinidazole 500 mg b.i.d. (OCT group). Patients with gastric or duodenal active ulcer received proton pump inhibitors for an additional 4 wk. H. pylori eradication was defined as negative of both rapid urease test and histology on biopsies taken from the gastric body and antrum at least 1 month after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients in the LAT group and four in the OCT group were lost to follow-up. No significant difference in either efficacy or tolerability was observed between the two regimens. Active ulcers healed in 97.8% of cases with LAT and in 100% of cases with OCT. The eradication rate was 80.8% in the LAT group and 85.5% in the OCT group, considering the per-protocol results, and 73.3% and 81.2%, respectively, considering the intention-to-treat results. Side effects occurred in one LAzT patient and in two OCT patients; they were mild and did not interfere with compliance. CONCLUSION: The new proposed ultrashort triple therapy, including lansoprazole, low dose azithromycin for 3 days, and a single dose of tinidazole, appears to be a very effective anti-H. pylori regimen, a simpler, cheaper, well-tolerated, and equally effective alternative to 1-wk triple therapy.     

Comparative effect of lansoprazole/amoxicillin with omeprazole/amoxicillin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer

Lansoprazole, a potent antisecretory drug, possesses on an equimolar basis a 4-fold higher in vitro anti-Helicobacter pylori activity than omeprazole. In a prospective randomized study we compared lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. with omeprazole 40 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days followed by lansoprazole 30 mg q.d. or omeprazole 20 mg q.d. for 14 additional days in 50 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients (14f, 36m, age 27-83 [mean 43] years). H. pylori infection was diagnosed by histology (3 antral biopsies and 2 from gastric body, H & E- and Giemsa stain), rapid urease test (CLO) and culture in 39 patients, or by histology and rapid urease test in 11 patients. Control endoscopy was performed 4-6 weeks after the end of treatment. For eradication, a negative result in all 3 diagnostic modalities was required. The eradication rate was 43% (9/21 patients) in both treatment groups. 8 patients were lost to follow-up. The ulcer healing rate was 100% in both groups. Nonsmokers had a significantly higher (p = 0.026) eradication rate than smokers. No relevant adverse effects of the therapy occurred. 24 patients with persistent H. pylori infection were subsequently treated with lansoprazole 60 mg b.i.d. and amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. for 14 days. Eradication was achieved in 5/22 (23%) patients (3/14 smokers, 2/8 nonsmokers), while 2 patients were lost to follow-up. 17 patients with persistent H. pylori infection after the second treatment received quadruple therapy consisting of metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. bismuth-subcitrate 120 mg q.i.d. and lansoprazole 30 mg for 10 days. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 12/15 patients (80%). In conclusion, lansoprazole plus amoxicillin was equal to omeprazole plus amoxicillin in the treatment of H. pylori infected duodenal ulcer patients. Patients with eradication failure after dual therapy were successfully treated by quadruple therapy. In contrast, high dose lansoprazole and amoxicillin therapy was effective in only 23% of patients with persistent infection after standard dual therapy.     

A three-day octreotide-containing helicobacter pylori eradication therapy for cure of peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Octreotide is used to arrest peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Since it has anti-secretory properties, it could also be used in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, to cure peptic ulcer before discharging patients from hospital. The aim of this pilot study was to determine safety and efficacy of an ultra short quadruple octreotide containing H. pylori eradication therapy in patients with peptic ulcer. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-six consecutive symptomatic H. pylori-positive patients with duodenal (n = 20) or gastric ulcer (n = 6), were treated with a three-day course of octreotide 0.3 mg/day subcutaneously, amoxicillin plus metronidazole 2 g/day orally and colloid bismuth subcitrate 480 mg/day. CLO-test, culture and crush tissue smears were performed on admission to the study, at 4 and 8 weeks post treatment. The effect of octreotide on intragastric pH (n = 10) was also investigated. RESULTS: Octreotide significantly increased the mean 24-hour intragastric pH > 3 over 68.9% of the time (37.1%-99.5%). There were no treatment side effects. Ulcer pain was abolished at between 2-12 days. By intention-to-treat 24/26(92.3%, 95% CI 82%-100%) ulcers had healed at 4 weeks. H. pylori eradication rate at 8 weeks was 88.5% (23/26) (95% CI 76%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: Our ultra-short octreotide containing quadruple therapy is a safe and effective regime in eradicating H. pylori and healing peptic ulcers. It may be a suitable therapy for hospitalized patients with peptic ulcer hemorrhage.     

Omeprazole/amoxicillin versus triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer disease: two-year follow-up of a prospective randomized study

The present study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy and dual therapy for Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients and to evaluate the long-term clinical course of ulcer disease. Forty duodenal ulcer patients with proven H. pylori infection were enrolled into the study and randomly treated with either triple therapy consisting of bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole and tetracycline plus ranitidine or with dual therapy comprising omeprazole and amoxicillin. Patients were investigated clinically and endoscopically including assessment of H. pylori infection by means or rapid urease test, culture, histology and urea breath testing 4 weeks after cessation of eradication therapy, in 1-year intervals and when dyspeptic symptoms recurred. One patient of each group was lost during follow-up. H. pylori infection was cured by triple therapy in 84.2% and by dual therapy in 78.9% (p = 1.00). During follow-up, all patients with cure of H. pylori infection (n = 31) remained in stable remission with respect to duodenal ulcer disease, while 6 out of 7 patients persistently infected with H. pylori developed an ulcer relapse (p < 0.001). One patient with cured infection had had an episode of dyspeptic symptoms requiring pharmacotherapy and in another 3 patients mild refluxesophagitis without necessity of medical treatment had been detected on the occasion of a scheduled endoscopy. In the short-term, cure of the infection resulted in a marked reduction of the degree of antral gastritis and in a loss of activity in all but one patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

One-week low-dose triple therapy vs. two-week medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Our study is to compare a short-term low-dose triple therapy with a long-term medium-dose double therapy for H.pylori eradication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ten consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms, with H.pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of the following 2 groups with different therapeutic regimens: A) omeprazole 20 mg/day for 7 days, tinidazole 500 mg bid for 7 days, clarithromycin 250 mg bid for 7 days (55 pts, 20 with peptic ulcer); B) omeprazole 20 mg bid for 14 days, amoxycillin 1000 mg bid for 14 days (55 pts, 28 with peptic ulcer). The "H.pylori status" was evaluated by means of histology, culture and urease test, at entry and 8 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Two group A and one group B pts didn't complete the treatment. The H.pylori eradication was obtained in 38 pts of group A (71.69%) (C.I.95%: 55.19176-80.86293), in 31 of group B (58.49%) (C.I.95%: 42.32777-69.7017); on Intention-to-Treat analysis, the rate of eradication gave similar results. Side effects occurred in 9 pts of group A (16.98%), in 8 of group B (14.81%). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term low-dose triple therapy with omeprazole/tinidazole/clarithromycin has a better cost/benefit ratio than long-term dual therapy with omeprazole/amoxycillin in the H.pylori eradication, but it causes more side-effects.     

Randomised trial of eradication of Helicobacter pylori before non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy to prevent peptic ulcers

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is common in patients with peptic ulcers caused by the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). But the pathogenic role of H pylori in this disease is controversial. We studied the efficacy of eradication of H pylori in the prevention of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers. METHODS: We recruited patients with musculoskeletal pain who required NSAID treatment. None of the patients had previous exposure to NSAID therapy. Patients who had H pylori infection but no pre-existing ulcers on endoscopy were randomly allocated naproxen alone (750 mg daily) for 8 weeks or a 1-week course of triple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 400 mg, each given orally four times daily) before administration of naproxen (750 mg daily). Endoscopy was repeated after 8 weeks of naproxen treatment or when naproxen treatment was stopped early because of bleeding or intractable dyspepsia. All endoscopic examinations were done by one endoscopist who was unaware of treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the cumulative rate of gastric and duodenal ulcers. FINDINGS: 202 patients underwent endoscopic screening for enrolment in the trial, and 100 eligible patients were randomly assigned treatment. 92 patients completed the trial (47 in the naproxen group, 45 in the triple-therapy group). At 8 weeks, H pylori had been eradicated from no patients in the naproxen group and 40 (89%) in the triple-therapy group (p < 0.001). 12 (26%) naproxen-group patients developed ulcers: five had ulcer pain and one developed ulcer bleeding. Only three (7%) patients on triple therapy had ulcers, and two of these patients had failure of H pylori eradication (p = 0.01). Thus, 12 (26%) patients with persistent H pylori infection but only one (3%) with successful H pylori eradication developed ulcers with naproxen (p = 0.002). INTERPRETATION: Eradication of H pylori before NSAID therapy reduces the occurrence of NSAID-induced peptic ulcers.     

Cure of Helicobacter pylori infection and healing of duodenal ulcer: comparison of pantoprazole-based one-week modified triple therapy versus two-week dual therapy. The International Pantoprazole HP Study Group

OBJECTIVE: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is recommended as the first-line therapeutic concept for reliable long-term prevention of duodenal ulcer (DU) relapse. Current treatment regimens vary in efficacy, complexity, and compliance. To assess the efficacy of pantoprazole in H. pylori eradication in parallel groups of patients using two eradication regimens. METHODS: Patients, (18-85 yr old; intention-to-treat, n=286) with proven DU, positive rapid urease test (biopsy), and 13C-urea breath test (UBT) were included in a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Modified triple therapy consisted of 40 mg pantoprazole b.i.d., 500 mg clarithromycin t.i.d., and 500 mg metronidazole t.i.d. for 7 days (PCM therapy); dual therapy consisted of 40 mg pantoprazole b.i.d. and 500 mg clarithromycin t.id. for 14 days (PC therapy). In both groups 40 mg pantoprazole o.d. was given until day 28 when healing of DU was evaluated endoscopically; H. pylori status was assessed by UBT on day 56. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rate was 95% in PCM versus 60% in PC therapy groups (perprotocol population, p < 0.001), and 82% in PCM versus 50% in PC therapy in the intention-to-treat patient population (p < 0.001). The DU healing rate was 98% in the PCM and 95% in the PC therapy groups (per-protocol population). Both regimens were similarly well tolerated. Adverse events in both regimens included taste disturbance, diarrhea, and increased serum concentration of liver enzymes, at an incidence of < 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to 2-wk PC therapy (pantoprazole and clarithromycin), the 1-wk PCM therapy (pantoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole) is a significantly superior and highly promising strategy for eradication of H. pylori.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori with lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole--an open pilot study

BACKGROUND: The most extensively studied Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen comprises omeprazole, clarithromycin and metronidazole. Macrolide antibiotics other than clarithromycin should achieve similar efficacy, but they have not yet been thoroughly tested. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy regimen using lansoprazole, roxithromycin, and metronidazole on the basis of multicentre outpatient care in an open pilot study. METHODS: 163 patients with duodenal ulcer and proven H. pylori infection received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., roxithromycin 300 mg b.d. and metronidazole 500 mg b.d. for 7 days followed by another 7 days of lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. H. pylori status was determined by urease quick test, histology, microbiology and 13C-urea breath test before starting and at least 4 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: 150 patients were available for evaluation; H. pylori was successfully eradicated in 84.7% (127/ 150) as determined by urease quick test, 78.0% (117/150) by histology, 81.3% (109/134) by 13C-urea breath test; and in 75.3% (113/150), at least two tests were negative. Side-effects were reported in 34 patients (most commonly diarrhoea and changes in liver function tests), in two cases the study medication was interrupted. Prior to treatment, 23% of the H. pylori isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 3.4% against roxithromycin. After unsuccessful treatment, 84% of the isolates were resistant against metronidazole and 21% against roxithromycin. Primary resistance to metronidazole increased the chance of treatment failure approximately sevenfold (7% vs. 53%). CONCLUSIONS: For H. pylori eradication, the combination of lansoprazole, roxithromycin and metronidazole proved to be as safe as other current triple therapy regimens, while a comparison of efficacy rates yet remains to be assessed in prospective controlled trials. The metronidazole-resistant H. pylori is not rare in Germany and, in the present study, has strongly influenced treatment success.     

Cost-effectiveness analysis of the eradication of Helicobacter pylori as treatment for duodenal ulcer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in patients with duodenal ulcer in Spain. METHODS: A decision model was used to compare the cost per cured patient and the cost per patient without recurrence in one year for four treatment strategies: 1) intermittent antisecretory therapy, 2) initial antisecretory therapy and H. pylori eradication if ulcer recurrence, 3) initial H. pylori eradication with antibiotics and antisecretory drugs, 4) antisecretory therapy followed by continuous maintenance therapy with ranitidine. Clinical variables were obtained from published studies made in Spain. RESULTS: Initial H. pylori eradication is the cheapest strategy (74,702-82,028 ptas per cured patient) and the most effective (83.3-85.2% patients without recurrence in one year). Intermittent antisecretory therapy is one of the most expensive (94,891-105,324 ptas per cured patient) and the less effective (12% patients without recurrence in one year). CONCLUSION: Initial eradication of H. pylori is the treatment of choice in patients with duodenal ulcer.     

One-week antibiotics versus maintenance acid suppression therapy for Helicobacter pylori-associated peptic ulcer bleeding

Bleeding peptic ulcer is the most important cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Our aim was to compare the effect of anti-Helicobacter therapy with maintenance treatment of H2-receptor antagonist in the prevention of relapses of ulcer and bleeding. Patients with bleeding duodenal or gastric ulcers and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either a one-week course of triple therapy with bismuth subcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline plus ranitidine or a six-week course of ranitidine 300 mg/day. After the ulcers healed, the antibiotic-treated patients were not given any medication, whereas the ranitidine-treated patients continued to receive a maintenance dose of 150 mg/day. One hundred twenty-six patients were randomized to receive anti-Helicobacter therapy and 124 patients to receive long-term ranitidine. H. pylori eradication was achieved in 98.2% in those who received triple therapy and 6.1% in those who received ranitidine (P < 0.0001). At the six-week follow-up, ulcer healing was documented in 88.2% in those who received triple therapy and 86.1% in those who received ranitidine (P = 0.639). Recurrent ulcer developed in nine of the ranitidine-treated patients and three of them presented with recurrent upper gastrointestinal bleeding. One patient in the antibiotic group developed recurrent ulcer without rebleeding (P = 0.01). It is concluded that eradication of H. pylori is sufficient for the prevention of recurrent bleeding ulcers.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction of duodenal ulcer recurrence

OBJECTIVES: An abundance of data exists documenting the association of H. pylori eradication with the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. AIM: To evaluate the validity of using H. pylori eradication as a surrogate marker for the reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence using rigorously controlled studies. METHODS: Three controlled clinical trials were conducted in patients with uncomplicated, active duodenal ulcers. Patients were treated with various combinations of omeprazole and amoxycillin. Ulcer healing and H. pylori eradication were assessed. For patients whose duodenal ulcer healed, duodenal ulcer recurrence was determined over a 6-month period in patients with H. pylori eradication and those remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment. To support the data obtained from these clinical trials, a search of the medical literature was conducted to identify additional human clinical trials in which duodenal ulcer recurrence rates were measured and categorized by H. pylori status at least 1 month post-treatment. RESULTS: In 11 controlled trials, the overall 6-18-month duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 54% among patients remaining positive for H. pylori at least 4 weeks after treatment compared to 6% among patients with H. pylori eradication following treatment. This finding was corroborated by the uncontrolled trials, in which the duodenal ulcer recurrence rate was 64% among patients found to be H. pylori-positive and 6% for patients found to be H. pylori-negative at least 4 weeks after treatment. A time course of duodenal ulcer recurrence rates using pooled data from both controlled and uncontrolled studies demonstrated that duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-negative patients persisted for up to 4 years following treatment. Duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive patients increased for the first year, then levelled off. A comparison of the duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for different treatment regimens revealed that eradication regimens based on omeprazole plus antibiotics and bismuth plus antibiotics exhibited similar duodenal ulcer recurrence rates for H. pylori-positive and -negative patients. CONCLUSION: Regardless of treatment regimens, H. pylori eradication produced a consistent and significant reduction in duodenal ulcer recurrence. Therefore H. pylori eradication, 4 weeks post-therapy, can be used as a surrogate marker for reduced duodenal ulcer recurrence in investigational clinical trials.     

Midazolam improves postoperative epidural analgesia with continuous infusion of local anaesthetics

BACKGROUND: A number of triple drug regimens using proton pump inhibitors and two antibiotics have been evaluated in the West and reported to achieve Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of over 90%. In developing countries however, these combinations have neither been well evaluated, nor the optimum treatment for H. pylori infection well defined. AIM: To compare the combination of a proton pump inhibitor with a nitroimidazole and another antibiotic in eradicating H. pylori infection and healing duodenal ulcer. METHODS: Sixty consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer who were positive for H. pylori (by rapid urease test and 14C-urea breath test) were randomized into three treatments groups: (1) LAS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., amoxycillin 500 mg q.d.s. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks; (2) LCS (n=18): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 1 week; (3) LPS (n=21): lansoprazole 30 mg o.m., pefloxacin 400 mg o.m. and secnidazole 2 g on alternate days for 2 weeks. Urease and breath tests were performed at 0, 6 and 12 weeks to check for H. pylori eradication. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat eradication rates were as follows: LAS 86%, LCS 83%, LPS 71%; the overall ulcer healing rate was 90% at 6 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: High H. pylori eradication rates were achieved using the amoxycillin- and clarithromycin-based therapies. Fewer side-effects, better compliance and low cost favoured the amoxycillin-based therapy.