Solution and solid‐state NMR investigation of poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) blends

The development of polymer blends has become very important for the polymer industry because these blends have shown to be a successful and versatile alternative way to obtain a new polymer. In this study, binary blends formed by poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) were prepared by solution casting and evaluated by solution and solid‐state NMR. Variations in the microstructure of PMMA were analyzed by ¹³C solution NMR. Solid‐state NMR promotes responses on physical interaction, homogeneity, and compatibility to use these blends to understand the behavior of the ternary blends. The NMR results led‐us to acquire information on the polymer blend microstructure and molecular dynamic behavior. From the NMR solution, it was possible to evaluate the microstructure of both polymer blend components; they were atactic. From the solid state, good compatibility between both polymer components was characterized. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 93: 372–377, 2004     

Miscibility and transesterification in ternary blends of poly(ethylene naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide)

Miscibility and morphology of poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate)/poly(pentamethylene terephthalate)/poly(ether imide) (PEN/PPT/PEI) blends were studied by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), optical microscopy (OM), proton nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (¹H‐NMR), and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). OM and DSC results from ternary blends revealed the immiscibility of PEN/PPT/PEI blends, but ternary blends of all compositions were phase‐homogeneous following heat treatment at 300°C for over 60 min. Annealing samples at 300°C yielded an amorphous blend with a clear and single T_g at the final state. Experimental data from ¹H‐NMR revealed that PEN/PPT copolymers (ENPT) were formed by the so‐called transesterification. The effect of transesterification on glass transition and crystallization was discussed in detail. The sequence structures of the copolyester were identified by triad analysis, which showed that the mean sequence lengths became shorter and the randomness increased with heating time. The results reveal that a random copolymer improved the miscibility of the ternary blends, in which, the length of the homo segments in the polymer chain decreased and the crystal formation was disturbed because of the irregularity of the structure, as the exchange reaction proceeded. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 3840–3849, 2006     

Structural evolution of poly(lactic acid)/poly(ethylene oxide)/unmodified clay upon ambient ageing

Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/unmodified clay masterbatches are compounded together in order to investigate the ambient ageing of the resulting PLA/PEO/clay ternary blends. Binary blends are miscible up to 20 wt PEO% and in ternary counterparts, clay is intercalated at a nanometric scale, similarly to the clay dispersion state in masterbatches. PEO/clay interactions are strong, as confirmed by the lower plasticization of ternary blends. Furthermore, structural modifications occurring over time are evidenced for all blends through the observation of changes in thermal responses. Over the 220‐day observation period, lower plasticized samples undergo physical ageing only whereas blends close to the miscibility limit know a rapid PLA/PEO phase separation without physical ageing. For blends with intermediate PEO concentrations, both phenomena are observed with slower PLA chain mobility transition. Remarkably clay appears to affect both phenomena, ternary blends having limited physical ageing and slower PLA/PEO segregation. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40426.     

Crystallization behavior of PEO in blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐(ethylene oxide) block copolymer

The crystallization behavior of two molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide)s (PEO) and their blends with the block copolymer poly(2‐vinyl pyridine)‐b‐poly(ethylene oxide) (P2VP‐b‐PEO) was investigated by polarized optical microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). A sharp decreasing of the spherulite growth rate was observed with the increasing of the copolymer content in the blend. The addition of P2VP‐b‐PEO to PEO increases the degradation temperature becoming the thermal stability of the blend very similar to that of the block copolymer P2VP‐b‐PEO. Glass transition temperatures, T_g, for PEO/P2VP‐b‐PEO blends were intermediate between those of the pure components and the value increased as the content of PEO homopolymer decreased in the blend. AFM images showed spherulites with lamellar crystal morphology for the homopolymer PEO. Lamellar crystal morphology with sheaf‐like lamellar arrangement was observed for 80 wt% PEO(200M) and a lamellar crystal morphology with grain aggregation was observed for 50 and 20 wt% blends. The isothermal crystallization kinetics of PEO was progressively retarded as the copolymer content in the blend increased, since the copolymer hinders the molecular mobility in the miscible amorphous phase. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Solution and solid state nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of poly(methylmethacrylate)/ poly(ethylene oxide) blends

It is well known that nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is a powerful method to characterize blends compatibility at the molecular level. In this work binary blends formed by poly(methylmethacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide), PMMA/PEO, were investigated by different solution and solid state NMR techniques to obtain information on blends homogeneity and compatibility. It was characterized that the values of T₁^Hρ obtained by variable contact time and delayed contact time experiments, for each composition, were distinct and this fact suggests that regions with different molecular mobilities exist, as a consequence of blending interaction. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2955–2958, 2003     

Miscibility and crystallization kinetics of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/ poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization kinetics of the blends of random poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) [P(HB‐co‐HV)] copolymer and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were miscible in the melt. Thus the single glass‐transition temperature (T_g) of the blends within the whole composition range suggests that P(HB‐co‐HV) and PMMA were totally miscible for the miscible blends. The equilibrium melting point (T°_m) of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends decreased with increasing PMMA. The T°_m depression supports the miscibility of the blends. With respect to the results of crystallization kinetics, it was found that both the spherulitic growth rate and the overall crystallization rate decreased with the addition of PMMA. The kinetics retardation was attributed to the decrease in P(HB‐co‐HV) molecular mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) concentration resulting from the addition of PMMA, which has a higher T_g. According to secondary nucleation theory, the kinetics of spherulitic crystallization of P(HB‐co‐HV) in the blends was analyzed in the studied temperature range. The crystallizations of P(HB‐co‐HV) in P(HB‐co‐HV)/PMMA blends were assigned to n = 4, regime III growth process. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 3595–3603, 2004     

Casting solvent effect on crystallization behavior and morphology of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate)

Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) blends were prepared by casting from either chloroform or benzene solvents. After casting from solvents, all samples used in this study were preheated to 100°C and held for 10 min. Then, the solvent effect on the crystallization behavior and thermodynamic properties were studied by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC). Also, the morphology of spherulite of casting film was studied by polarized optical microscope. From the DSC and polarizing optical microscopy (POM) results, it was found that PEO/PMMA was miscible in the molten state no matter which casting solvent was used. However, the crystallization of PEO in the chloroform‐cast blend was more easily suppressed than it was in the benzene‐cast blend. Relatively, the chloroform‐cast blend showed the greater melting‐point depressing of PEO crystals. Also, the spherulite of chloroform‐cast film showed a coarser birefringence. It was supposed that the chloroform‐cast blend had more homogeneous morphology. It is fair to say that polymer blends, cast from solvent, are not necessarily in equilibrium. However, the benzene‐cast blends still were not in equilibrium even after preheating at 100°C for 10 min. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 1627–1636, 2000     

Crystallization behavior and hydrophilicity of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) ternary blends

Ternary blends composed of matrix polymer poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) with different proportions of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)/poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP) blends were prepared by melt mixing. The miscibility, crystallization behavior, mechanical properties and hydrophilicity of the ternary blends have been investigated. The high compatibility of PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends is induced by strong interactions between the carbonyl groups of the PMMA/PVP blend and the CF₂ or CH₂ group of PVDF. According to the Fourier transform infrared and wide‐angle X‐ray difffraction analyses, the introduction of PMMA does not change the crystalline state (i.e. α phase) of PVDF. By contrast, the addition of PVP in the blends favors the transformation of the crystalline state of PVDF from non‐polar α to polar β phase. Moreover, the crystallinity of the PVDF/PMMA/PVP ternary blends also decreases compared with neat PVDF. Through mechanical analysis, the elongation at break of the blends significantly increases to more than six times that of neat PVDF. This confirms that the addition of the PMMA/PVP blend enhances the toughness of PVDF. Besides, the hydrophilicity of PVDF is remarkably improved by blending with PMMA/PVP; in particular when the content of PVP reaches 30 wt%, the water contact angle displays its lowest value which decreased from 91.4° to 51.0°. Copyright © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry     

Molecular dynamics and dissipative particle dynamics simulations for the miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(vinyl chloride) blends

The miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO)/poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends are investigated by atomistic molecular dynamics and mesoscale dissipative dynamics simulations. The specific volumes of three PEO/PVC blends (with weight ratio at 70/30, 50/50 and 30/70) as well as pure PEO and PVC are examined as a function of temperature. The glass transition temperatures are estimated to be 251, 268, 280, 313 and 350 K for pure PEO, PEO/PVC 70/30, 50/50, 30/70 and pure PVC. Among different energy contributions, the torsion and van der Waals energies exhibit pronounced kinks versus temperature. The Flory-Huggins parameters determined from the cohesive energy densities and the radial distribution functions of the inter-molecular atoms suggest that PEO/PVC 70/30 and 30/70 blends are more miscible than 50/50 blend. This is further supported by the morphologies of PEO/PVC blends, in which the 50/50 blend exhibits segregated domains implying a weak phase separation. Hydrogen bonds are found to form between O atoms of PEO and H atoms of PVC, with a larger degree in PEO/PVC 70/30 and 30/70 blends than in 50/50 blend. The addition of PVC into PEO suppresses the mobility of PEO chains, which is consistent with the experiment observation of decreased crystallization rate as well as crystallization temperature of PEO.     

Miscibility enhancement on the immiscible poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) and poly (ethyl methacrylate) with poly (vinyl phenol)

The miscibility behavior of ternary blends of poly (vinyl phenol) (PVPh)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP)/poly (ethyl methacrylate) (PEMA) was investigated mainly with calorimetry. PVPh is miscible with both PVP and PEMA on the basis of the single T_g observed over the entire composition range. FTIR was used to study the hydrogen bonding interaction between the hydroxyl group of PVPh and the carbonyl group of PVP and PEMA at various compositions. Furthermore, the addition of PVPh is able to enhance the miscibility of the immiscible PVP/PEMA and eventually transforms it into a miscible blend, especially when the ratio between PVP/PEMA is 3:1, probably because of favorable physical interaction. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1205–1213, 2006     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Ionomeric blends of poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer: Miscibility,crystallization, and melting behavior

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomer (SMAI) blends were studied by the dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). This study has demonstrated that the presence of ion–dipole interactions enhances the miscibility of otherwise immiscible polymers in the PEO and high molecular weight poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA). The effect of ion–dipole interactions on enhancing miscibility is confirmed by the presence of a single glass transition temperature (T_g) and a depression of the equilibrium melting temperature of the PEO component. The equilibrium melting temperature of PEO in the blends are obtained using Hoffman‐Weeks plots. The interaction energy density, β, is calculated from these data using the Nishi‐Wang equation. The results suggest that PEO and SMAI blends are thermodynamically miscible in the melt. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 77: 1–7, 2000     

Miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

The miscibility and crystallization behavior of poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate‐co‐3‐hydroxyvalerate) (P(HB‐co‐HV))/poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) blends have been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarized optical microscopy (POM). It was found that P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends were miscible in the melt over the whole compositions. Thus the blend exhibited a single glass transition temperature (T_g), which increased with increasing PVAc composition. The spherulitic morphologies of P(HB‐co‐HV)/PVAc blends indicated that the PVAc was predominantly segregated into P(HB‐co‐HV) interlamellar or interfibrillar regions during P(HB‐co‐HV) crystallization because of the volume‐filled spherulites. As to the crystallization kinetics study, it was found that the overall crystallization and crystal growth rates decreased with the addition of PVAc. The kinetics retardation was primarily attributed to the reduction of chain mobility and dilution of P(HB‐co‐HV) upon mixing with higher T_g PVAc. The overall crystallization rate was predominantly governed by the spherulitic growth rate and promoted by the samples treated with the quenched state because of the higher nucleation density. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 980–988, 2006     

Effect of the tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the phase diagram of its ternary blends

Previously, isotactic and atactic poly(methyl methacrylates) (PMMAs) were found to be miscible with poly(vinyl phenol) (PVPh) and poly(hydroxy ether of bisphenol‐A) (phenoxy) because all the prepared films were transparent and showed composition‐dependent glass transition temperatures (T_g's). However, syndiotactic PMMA was immiscible with PVPh because most of the cast films had two T_g's. On the contrary, syndiotactic PMMA was still miscible with phenoxy. According to our preliminary results, PVPh and phenoxy are not miscible. Also to our knowledge, nobody has reported any results concerning the effect of the tacticity of PMMA on its ternary blend containing PVPh and phenoxy. The miscibility of a ternary blend consisting of PVPh, phenoxy, and tactic PMMA was thus investigated and reported in this article. Calorimetry was used as the principal tool to study miscibility. An approximate phase diagram of the ternary blends containing different tactic PMMA was established, probably for the first time, based on differential scanning calorimetry data. Immiscibility was found in most of the studied ternaries but a slight difference due to the effect of tacticity of PMMA was definitely observed. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 86: 2720–2726, 2002     

Viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) having various acrylonitrile contents

Dynamic viscoelastic properties of blends of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile) (SAN) with various AN contents were measured to evaluate the influence of SAN composition, consequently χ parameter, upon the melt rheology. PMMA/SAN blends were miscible and exhibited a terminal flow region characterized by Newtonian flow, when the acrylonitrile (AN) content of SAN ranges from 10 to 27 wt %. Whereas, PMMA/SAN blends were immiscible and exhibited a long time relaxation, when the AN content in SAN is less than several wt % or greater than 30 wt %. Correspondingly, melt rheology of the blends was characterized by the plots of storage modulus G′ against loss modulus G″. Log G′ versus log G″ plots exhibited a straight line of slope 2 for the miscible blends, but did not show a straight line for the immiscible blends because of their long time relaxation mechanism. The plateau modulus, determined as the storage modulus G′ in the plateau zone at the frequency where tan δ is at maximum, varied linearly with the AN content of SAN irrespective of blend miscibility. This result indicates that the additivity rule holds well for the entanglement molecular weights in miscible PMMA/SAN blends. However, the entanglement molecular weights in immiscible blends should have “apparent” values, because the above method to determine the plateau modulus is not applicable for the immiscible blends. Effect of χ parameter on the plateau modulus of the miscible blends could not be found. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(L‐lactide)/poly(vinyl acetate) blends

Poly(vinyl acetate) (PVAc) was added to the crystalline blends of poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and poly(L ‐lactide) (PLLA) (40/60) of higher molecular weights, whereas diblock and triblock poly(ethylene glycol)–poly(L ‐lactide) copolymers were added to the same blend of moderate molecular weights. The crystallization rate of PLLA of the blend containing PVAc was reduced, as evidenced by X‐ray diffraction measurement. A ringed spherulite morphology of PLLA was observed in the PEO/PLLA/PVAc blend, attributed to the presence of twisted lamellae, and the morphology was affected by the amount of PVAc. A steady increase in the elongation at break in the solution blend with an increase in the PVAc content was observed. The melting behavior of PLLA and PEO in the PEO/PLLA/block copolymer blends was not greatly affected by the block copolymer, and the average size of the dispersed PEO domain was not significantly changed by the block copolymer. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 3618–3626, 2001     

Poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends: Influence of tacticity of poly(methyl methacrylate) on blend structure and miscibility

The influence of different configurations of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the miscibility and superstructure of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) blends was examined using small-angle X-ray scattering and differential scanning calorimetry. The blends prepared by solution casting were isothermally crystallized at 48°C. The miscibility, the melting behaviour, the glass transition temperature and the structural parameters of the blends were strongly dependent on the tacticity and blend composition. The small-angle X-ray intensity profiles were analysed using a recently developed methodology. For the poly(ethylene oxide)/atactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/APMMA) and poly(ethylene oxide)/syndiotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/SPMMA) blends, the long period and the amorphous and transition region thicknesses increased with increase of PMMA content, whereas for the poly(ethylene oxide)/isotactic poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/IPMMA) blends they are independent of composition. The structural properties of the blends were attributed to the presence of non-crystallizable material in the interlamellar or interfibrillar regions, depending on PMMA tacticity. From the glass transition and melting temperatures, it has been supposed that one homogeneous amorphous phase is present in the case of PEO/APMMA and PEO/SPMMA blends and that the PEO/IPMMA amorphous system is phase-separated. The free-volume contribution to the energy of mixing for the various tactic PMMAs is hypothesized to be responsible for the difference in mixing behaviour.     

On the deformation of poly(methyl methacrylate) poly(ethylene oxide) blends: A molecular characterization by small-angle neutron scattering

The deformation behavior of miscible amorphous/amorphous PMMA/PEO poly(methyl methacrylate)/poly(ethylene oxide) blends was compared with that of pure PMMA. Small-angle neutron scattering experiments were performed on labeled systems made of PEO + D-PMMA + HPMMA. Characteristic molecular parameters such as radius of gyration, Rg, molecular weight, M_w, and interaction parameter, X, were extracted from the coherent scattering cross sections, Molecular anisotropy was measured on the solid state coextruded samples, and the observed drawing efficiency is compared with, the results of shrinkage tests. In the case of PMMA/PEO blends, anomalous scattering behavior precludes any quantitative Interpretation of the scattering patterns, but revealed important structural changes upon drawing, namely a deformation-induced phase separation.     

Biodegradable blends of high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) with poly(3‐hydroxypropionic acid) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyric acid): a miscibility study by DSC,DMTA and NMR spectroscopy

The miscibility of high molecular weight poly(ethylene oxide) blends with poly(3‐hydroxypropionic acid) and poly(3‐hydroxybutyric acid) (P(3HB)) has been investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA) and high‐resolution solid state ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). The DSC thermal behaviour of the blends revealed that the binary blends of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(3‐hydroxypropionic acid) (OP blends) were miscible over the whole composition range while the miscibility of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(3‐hydroxybutyric acid) blends (OB blends) was dependent on the blend composition. OB blends were found to be partly miscible at the middle P(3HB) contents (25 %, 50 %) and miscible at other P(3HB) contents (10 %, 75 % and 90 %). Single‐phase behaviour for OP blends and phase separation behaviour for OB blends were observed from DMTA. The results from NMR spectroscopy revealed that the two components in the OP50 blend were intimately mixed on a scale of about 35 nm, while the domain sizes in the OB blend with a P(3HB) content of 50 % were larger than about 32 nm. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Study of the non-isothermal crystallization of poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) blends

Crystallization during cooling of a poly(ethylene oxide)/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PEO/PMMA) blend has been studied using differential scanning calorimetry. Five different cooling rates V_r have been used (namely 10, 5, 2.5, 1.25 and 0.625°C min⁻¹). The presence of PMMA for a given V_r reduces the overall PEO crystallization rate. This effect can be ascribed to reduction of the mobility of the crystallizable chains due to the presence of the amorphous component. It was found that in quasi-static conditions at lower V_r, when nucleation and growth processes are determined by a thermal mechanism alone, the experimental data for the pure PEO and the PEO/PMMA $\text{90}\text{10}$ and $\text{80}\text{20}$ blends agree quite well with the theoretical results obtained using the zero-order approximation of Ziabicki's theory. At higher V_r, in the case of the blends, athermal nucleation cannot be neglected, and then the same approximation does not fit the experimental results. The experimental data analysed showed no agreement with Ozawa's theoretical predictions.