Thermoplastic vulcanizates based on epoxidized natural rubber/polypropylene blends: Effect of epoxide levels in ENR molecules

Epoxidized natural rubbers (ENR) with various levels of epoxide groups were prepared. Thermoplastic vulcanizates based on 75/25 ENRs/PP blends with Ph‐PP compatibilizer were later prepared by dynamic vulcanization using sulfur curing system. Influence of various levels of epoxide groups on rheological, mechanical morphological properties, and swelling resistance of the TPVs was investigated. It was found that the mixing torque, apparent shear stress, apparent shear viscosity, tensile strength, and hardness properties increased with increasing levels of epoxide groups in the ENR molecules. This may be attributed to increasing level of chemical interaction between the methylol groups of the Ph‐PP molecules and polar functional groups of the ENR molecules. Also, the PP segments in the Ph‐PP molecules are capable of compatibilizing with the PP molecules used as a blend composition. In SEM micrographs, we observed finer dispersion of vulcanized rubber domains as increasing levels of epoxide contents. This corresponds to increasing trend of strength and hardness properties of the TPVs. An increasing trend of tension set and a decreasing trend of elongation at break were observed as increasing levels of epoxide groups in the ENR molecules. This is because of higher rigidity of the vulcanized ENR phase with higher epoxide groups. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3046–3052, 2006     

Thermoplastic elastomers based on epoxidized natural rubber and high‐density polyethylene blends: Effect of blend compatibilizers on the mechanical and morphological properties

Epoxidized natural rubber (ENR) with a level of epoxide groups of 20 mol % was prepared via the performic epoxidation method. It was then used to blend with high‐density polyethylene (HDPE) at various blend ratios. Three types of blend compatibilizers were prepared. These included a graft copolymer of HDPE and maleic anhydride (MA; i.e., HDPE‐g‐MA) and two types of phenolic modified HDPEs using phenolic resins SP‐1045 and HRJ‐10518 (i.e., PhSP‐PE and PhHRJ‐PE), respectively. We found that the blend with compatibilizer exhibited superior tensile strength, hardness, and set properties to that of the blend without compatibilizer. The ENR and HDPE interaction via the link of compatibilizer molecules was the polar functional groups of the compatibilizer with the oxirane groups in the ENR molecules. Also, another end of the compatibilizer molecules (i.e., HDPE segments) was compatibilizing with the HDPE molecules in the blend components. The blend with compatibilizer also showed smaller phase morphology than the blend without compatibilizer. Among the three types of the blend compatibilizer, HDPE‐g‐MA provided the blend with the greatest strength and hardness properties but the lowest set properties. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Effect of grafted maleic anhydride content and recyclability of dynamically cured maleated natural rubber/polypropylene blends

Maleated natural rubbers (MNRs) were prepared using various levels of maleic anhydride (MA) at 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 phr. Dynamically cured 60/40 MNR/PP blends with phenolic‐modified polypropylene (Ph‐PP) compatibilizer at a loading level of 5 wt % of PP were prepared by melt mixing process using sulfur vulcanization system. The influence of the level of MA on properties of the thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) was studied. It was found that the mixing torque, apparent shear stress, shear viscosity, tensile strength, and hardness properties increased with increasing levels of the MA or grafted succinic anhydride groups in the MNR molecules. This is attributed to an increase in chemical interaction and reaction between methylol groups in the Ph‐PP molecules and polar functional groups in the MNR molecules upon increasing levels of the grafted succinic anhydride groups. As a consequence, compatibilizing block copolymers of MNR and PP blocks were formed. The block copolymers were capable of compatibilizing with MNR and PP blend components via the respective blocks. Recyclability of the MNR/PP TPVs was also studied. It was found that, after processing through a number of cycles by injection molding and extrusion processing, the TPV exhibited marginal decreases in mechanical properties. This corresponded to slightly increasing size of the dispersed vulcanized rubber domains. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Poly(L‐lactide)/polypropylene blends: Evaluation of mechanical,thermal, and morphological characteristics

Poly(L lactide) (PLA) was blended with polypropylene (PP) at various ratios (PLA:PP = 90 : 10, 80 : 20, 70 : 30, and 50 : 50) with a melt‐blending technique in an attempt to improve the melt processability of PLA. Maleic anhydride (MAH)‐grafted PP and glycidyl methacrylate were used as the reactive compatibilizers to induce miscibility in the blend. The PLA/PP blend at a blend ratio of 90 : 10, exhibited optimum mechanical performance. Differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis studies showed that the PLA/PP/MAH‐g‐PP blend had the maximum thermal stability with the support of the heat deflection temperature values. Furthermore, dynamic mechanical analysis findings revealed an increase in the glass‐transition temperature and storage modulus with the addition of MAH‐g‐PP compatibilizer. The interaction between the compatibilizers and constituent polymers was confirmed from Fourier transform infrared spectra, and scanning electron microscopy of impact‐fractured samples showed that the soft PP phase was dispersed within the PLA matrix, and a decrease in the domain size of the dispersed phase was observed with the incorporation of MAH‐g‐PP, which acted as a compatibilizer to improve the compatibility between PLA and PP. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of the compatibilizer,on the engineering properties of TPV based on Hypalon® and PP prepared by dynamic vulcanization

Elastomeric Chlorosulfonated polyethylene (Hypalon^®) and thermoplastic Polypropylene (PP) based thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) were prepared in presence of different doses of compatibilizer, maleic anhydride grafted PP (PP‐g‐MA) by employing dynamic vulcanization technique. The effect of incorporation in different proportions of compatibilizer on mechanical, spectral, morphological, thermal, and rheological properties of such TPVs was studied and the same were compared to that of virgin PP and amongst themselves. The mechanical analysis of the prepared TPVs exhibited significant improvements in stress at 25% modulus, ultimate tensile strength (UTS), and hardness values. FTIR studies revealed that a chemical interaction had taken place between Hypalon^® and functionalized compatibilizer during the process of dynamic vulcanization which led to an enhancement of interfacial adhesion between them. The two‐phase morphologies were clearly observed by scanning electron microscopic studies. The T_g values of Hypalon^® was modified in the TPVs as exhibited by differential scanning calorimetric studies. TGA studies indicated the increase in thermal stability of all TPVs with respect to the elastomeric Hypalon^®. Rheological properties showed that the compatibilizer reduces the melt viscosity of TPVs and thus facilitates the processibility of such TPVs. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014 , 131, 40312.     

The effect of maleated compatibilizers on the structure and properties of EVOH/clay nanocomposites

The effect of compatibilizers on the blending torque, crystallization behavior, intercalation level, thermal stability and morphology of EVOH/treated clay systems was investigated. Maleic anhydride‐grafted ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐MA) or maleic anhydride‐grafted linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE‐g‐MA) were used as compatibilizers of EVOH with clay, in various concentrations (1, 5 and 10 wt%). The blends were processed using Brabender Plastograph and characterized by XRD, SEM, DSC, DMTA and TGA. X‐ray diffraction shows advanced intercalation within the galleries when the compatibilizers were added. Unique results were obtained for the EVOH/clay/compatibilizer systems, owing to a high level of interaction developed in these systems, which plays a major role. Thermal analysis showed that with increasing compatibilizer content, lower crystallinity levels result, until at a certain content no crystallization has taken place. Significantly higher viscosity levels were obtained for the EVOH/clay blends compared to the neat polymer, as seen by a dramatic torque increase when processed in the Brabender machine. The DMTA spectra showed lower T_g values for the compatibilized nanocomposites compared to the neat EVOH and the uncompatibilized composites. Storage modulus was higher compared to the uncompatibilized EVOH/clay blend when EVA‐g‐MA compatibilizer was added (at all concentrations), and only at low contents of LLDPE‐g‐MA. TGA results show significant improvement of the blends thermal stability compared to the neat EVOH, and to the uncompatibilized blend, indicating an advanced intercalation.     

Experimental and computational investigation of EVOH/clay nanocomposites

Ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH)/organoclay nanocomposites were prepared via a dynamic melt‐intercalation process. The effect of compatibilizers on the melt blending torque, intercalation level, and morphology of EVOH/organoclay systems was investigated. Maleic anhydride grafted ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐ MA), or maleic anhydride grafted linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE‐g‐MA), were used to compatibilize EVOH with clay, at various concentrations (1, 5, and 10 wt %). Computer‐simulation techniques are used to predict structural properties and interactions of EVOH with compatibilizers in the presence and absence of clay. The simulation results strongly support the experimental findings and their interpretation. X‐ray diffraction shows enhanced intercalation within the galleries when the compatibilizers were added. Interestingly, results were obtained for the EVOH/clay/compatibilizer systems, owing to a high level of interaction developed in these systems. Thermal analysis shows that, upon increasing the compatibilizer content, lower crystallinity levels result, until at a certain compatibilizer content no crystallization is taking place. Significantly higher mixing viscosity levels were obtained for the EVOH/organoclay blends compared with the neat EVOH polymer. The storage modulus was higher compared with the uncompatibilized EVOH/organoclay blend in the presence of EVA‐g‐MA compatibilizer (at all concentrations), and only at low contents of LLDPE‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2060–2066, 2005     

Rheology‐morphology correlation in PET/PP blends: Influence of type of compatibilizer

Rheological and morphological properties of melt processed poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/polypropylene (PP) blends are presented. Two types of compatibilizer namely, PP‐g‐MA <MA= maleic anhydtide> and Elvaloy PTW, an n‐butyl acrylate glycidyl methacrylate ethylene terpolymers, were incorporated at different levels to the PET/PP blend system. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the dispersed particle sizes were smaller in PET‐rich blends than PP‐rich blends. With increasing compatibilizer level, the refinement of morphology was observed in both the systems. However, the blends compatibilized with PTW showed a more refined (smaller) particle size, and at high PTW content (10 wt%), the morphology changed towards monophasic. The significant changes in morphology were attributed to the highly reactive nature of PTW. Investigation of rheological properties revealed that the viscosity of the PET/PP blends followed typical trends based on mixing rule, which calculates the properties of blends based on a linear average. Incorporation of PP‐g‐MA into the blends resulted in a negative deviation in the viscosity of the system with respect to that of the neat blend. With increasing PP‐g‐MA level, the deviation became more pronounced. Although incorporation of the compatibilizer into the PET/PP blends refined the morphology, it led to a drastic drop of viscosity, which could be attributed to inherently lower molecular weight of the compatibilizer. In the case of the blends compatibilized by PTW, a strong positive deviation in rheological properties was observed that confirmed the stronger interaction between the blend components due to reactive compatibilization process, which led to the more refined morphology in this series of blends. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 19:25–30, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Effects of compounding procedure on morphology development,melt rheology,and mechanical properties of nanoclay reinforced dynamically vulcanized EPDM/polypropylene thermoplastic vulcanizates

New nanocomposite thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) comprising dynamically cross‐linked nanoscale EPDM rubber particles dispersed throughout the polypropylene (PP) matrix have been prepared by both batch and continuous melt blending of PP with EPDM in the presence of vulcanizing ingredients, nanoclay and maleated EPDM (EPDM‐g‐MA) as compatibilizer. X‐ray diffraction, linear melt viscoelastic measurement, and tensile mechanical behavior results revealed that the developed microstructure is strongly affected by the type of the melt compounding process as well as the route of material feeding. When EPDM phase was precompounded with a vulcanizing agent, nanoclay, and EPDM‐g‐MA prior to the melt blending with PP, not only nanosize cross‐linked rubber particles appeared uniformly throughout the PP continuous phase, but also the melt blending leads to the significant enhancement of the mechanical properties compared with counterpart samples prepared by one‐step melt mixing process. Also better dispersion of nano layers in the rubber compound before melt blending with PP results in higher mechanical properties of the resulted TPV. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:914–921, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Study on the microstructure and properties of bromobutyl rubber (BIIR)/polyamide‐12 (PA12) thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs)

In this study, polyamide‐12 (PA12)/brominated isobutylene‐isoprene (BIIR) TPVs with good mechanical properties and low gas permeability were prepared by dynamic vulcanization in a twin‐screw extruder. The effects of three kinds of compatibilizers on the microstructure and properties of BIIR/PA12 TPV were studied. The compatibility between BIIR and PA12 was improved when maleated hydrocarbon polymeric compatibilizer is added. The reaction between maleic anhydride and amine in polyamide leads to the in situ formation of hydrocarbon polymer grafted polyamide which subsequently can be used to lower the interfacial tension between BIIR and polyamide. The compatibilizing effect of maleic anhydride modified polypropylene (PP‐g‐MAH) on BIIR/PA12 blends is the best among these compatibilizers because the surface energy of PP‐g‐MAH is very close to that of BIIR. The dispersed rubber phase of the blend compatibilized by PP‐g‐MAH shows the smallest size and more uniform size distribution, and the resulting TPVs show the best mechanical properties. The effects of fillers on the properties of BIIR/PA12 TPV were also investigated. The size of the BIIR phase increases with the increase in the content of CaCO₃. The modulus and tensile strength of TPVs increased with the increase in the content of CaCO₃ because of the reinforcing effect of CaCO₃ on TPVs. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43043.     

Influence of compatibilizers and processing temperature on microcellular injection‐molded polypropylene/(waste tire powder) composites

Nowadays the economic recycling of waste tires has become a global challenge. The use of waste tire powder as a dispersed elastomeric phase in a polypropylene (PP) matrix offers an interesting opportunity for recycling of waste tire rubber. Compatibilized PP/(waste tire powder) composites are microcellularly processed to create a new class of materials with unique properties. Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of developing microcellular structures in PP/waste ground rubber tire (WGRT) composites. Microcellular PP/WGRT composites are prepared by an injection‐molding process using a chemical blowing agent. In this study, cell sizes, cell density, void fraction, and mechanical properties of the composite foams were measured, as well as the shear viscosity of the unfoamed composites. The influence of various compatibilizers and processing temperatures on cell morphology and the mechanical properties of injection‐molded PP/WGRT composites were investigated. It was seen that the addition of maleic anhydride‐grafted styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene (SEBS‐g‐MA) increased the shear viscosity of the composites. The void fraction and cell density of the PP/WGRT composites increased with addition of compatibilizers, whereas the average cell sizes decreased. A processing temperature range of 180–195°C gave finer microcellular structure and regular cell distribution. The SEBS‐g‐MA enhanced the elongation properties and acted as an effective compatibilizer in this particular system. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 2011. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

The Effect of Multiple Compatibilizers on the Impact Properties of Polypropylene/Polystyrene (PP/PS) Blend

Effects of compatibilizers on impact properties of polypropylene/ polystyrene (PP/PS) blends were studied and carried out through melt blending using co- rotating twin-screw extruder. A combination of two compatibilizers, maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (PP-g-MA) and styrene maleic anhydride (SMA) was applied into PP/PS blends. Results from the Izod impact strengths, SEM observations and contact angle measurements in PP(50)/PS(50) blends indicated a better compatibilization effect with the use of dual compatibilizers. This was most probably due to improved adhesion between phases in PP/PS blend systems. The use of dual compatibilizers in the blend compositions produced higher impact properties in the PP/PS blend systems compared to single compatibilizer system.     

Study on the microstructures and mechanical behaviour of compatibilized polypropylene/polyamide‐6 blends

A series of blends of polypropylene (PP)–polyamide‐6 (PA6) with either reactive polyethylene–octene elastomer (POE) grafted with maleic anhydride (POE‐g‐MA) or with maleated PP (PP‐g‐MA) as compatibilizers were prepared. The microstructures and mechanical properties of the blends were investigated by means of tensile and impact testing and by scanning electron microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. The results indicated that the miscibility of PP–PA6 blends was improved with the addition of POE‐g‐MA and PP‐g‐MA. For the PP/PA6/POE‐g‐MA system, an elastic interfacial POE layer was formed around PA6 particles and the dispersed POE phases were also observed in the PP matrix. Its Izod impact strength was four times that of pure PP matrix, whilst the tensile strength and Young's modulus were almost unchanged. The greatest tensile strength was obtained for PP/PA6/PP‐g‐MA blend, but its Izod impact strength was reduced in comparison with the pure PP matrix. © 2002 Society of Chemical Industry     

Rheological behavior of polyester blend and mechanical properties of the polypropylene–polyester blend fibers

The article deals with method of preparation, rheological properties, phase structure, and morphology of binary blend of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and ternary blends of polypropylene (PP)/(PET/PBT). The ternary blend of PET/PBT (PES) containing 30 wt % of PP is used as a final polymer additive (FPA) for blending with PP and subsequent spinning. In addition commercial montane (polyester) wax Licowax E (LiE) was used as a compatibilizer for spinning process enhancement. The PP/PES blend fibers containing 8 wt % of polyester as dispersed phase were prepared in a two‐step procedure: preparation of FPA using laboratory twin‐screw extruder and spinning of the PP/PES blend fibers after blending PP and FPA, using a laboratory spinning equipment. DSC analysis was used for investigation of the phase structure of the PES components and selected blends. Finally, the mechanical properties of the blend fibers were analyzed. It has been found that viscosity of the PET/PBT blends is strongly influenced by the presence of the major component. In addition, the major component suppresses crystallinity of the minor component phase up to a concentration of 30 wt %. PBT as major component in dispersed PES phase increases viscosity of the PET/PBT blend melts and increases the tensile strength of the PP/PES blend fibers. The impact of the compatibilizer on the uniformity of phase dispersion of PP/PES blend fibers was demonstrated. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 4222–4227, 2006     

Compatibilization of polypropylene/ poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) blends

Blending polypropylene (PP) with biodegradable poly(3‐hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) can be a nice alternative to minimize the disposal problem of PP and the intrinsic brittleness that restricts PHB applications. However, to achieve acceptable engineering properties, the blend needs to be compatibilized because of the immiscibility between PP and PHB. In this work, PP/PHB blends were prepared with different types of copolymers as possible compatibilizers: poly(propylene‐g‐maleic anhydride) (PP–MAH), poly (ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate) [P(E–MA)], poly(ethylene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–GMA)], and poly(ethylene‐co‐methyl acrylate‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) [P(E–MA–GMA)]. The effect of each copolymer on the morphology and mechanical properties of the blends was investigated. The results show that the compatibilizers efficiency decreased in this order: P(E–MA–GMA) > P(E–MA) > P(E–GMA) > PP–MAH; we explained this by taking into consideration the affinity degree of the compatibilizers with the PP matrix, the compatibilizers properties, and their ability to provide physical and/or reactive compatibilization with PHB. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Effect of interfacial interaction on the crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO3 composites modified by compatibilizers

To investigate the effect of interfacial interaction on the crystallization and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/nano‐CaCO₃ composites, three kinds of compatibilizers [PP grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA), ethylene–octene copolymer grafted with MA (POE‐g‐MA), and ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer grafted with MA (EVA‐g‐MA)] with the same polar groups (MA) but different backbones were used as compatibilizers to obtain various interfacial interactions among nano‐CaCO₃, compatibilizer, and PP. The results indicated that compatibilizers encapsulated nano‐CaCO₃ particles, forming a core–shell structure, and two interfaces were obtained in the compatibilized composites: interface between PP and compatibilizer and interface between compatibilizer and nano‐CaCO₃ particles. The crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO₃ composites were dependent on the interfacial interactions of these two interfaces, especially the interfacial interaction between PP and compatibilizer. The good compatibility between PP chain in PP‐g‐MA and PP matrix improved the dispersion of nano‐CaCO₃ particles, favored the nucleation effect of nano‐CaCO₃, increased the tensile strength and modulus, but reduced the ductility and impact strength of composites. The partial compatibility between POE in POE‐g‐MA and PP matrix had little effect on crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO₃ composites. The poor compatibility between EVA in EVA‐g‐MA and PP matrix retarded the nucleation effect of nano‐CaCO₃, and reduced the tensile strength, modulus, and impact strength. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Influences of compatibilizers on rheology and mechanical properties of propylene random copolymer/styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer/organic‐montmorillonite nanocomposites

Propylene random copolymer (PPR)/styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS)/compatibilizer/organic‐montmorillonite (OMMT) quaternary nanocomposites and PPR/compatibilizer/OMMT ternary nanocomposites were prepared via two‐stage melt blending and influences of compatibilizers, maleic anhydride (MA) grafted styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA), poly(octene‐co‐ethylene) (POE‐g‐MA), or propylene block copolymers (PPB‐g‐MA), on rheology and mechanical properties of the nanocomposites were investigated. The results of X‐ray diffraction measurement and transmission electron microscopy observation showed that OMMT layers were mainly intercalated in the nanocomposites except for the mainly exfoliated structure in the quaternary nanocomposites using POE‐g‐MA as compatibilizer. The nanocomposites exhibited pseudo‐solid like viscoelasticity in low frequencies and shear‐thinning in high shear rates. As far as OMMT dispersion was concerned, POE‐g‐MA was superior to SEBS‐g‐MA and PPB‐g‐MA, which gives rise to the highest viscosities in both the ternary and quaternary nanocomposites. The quaternary nanocomposites containing POE‐g‐MA were endowed with balanced toughness and rigidity. It was suggested that a suitable combination of compatibilizer and SEBS was an essentially important factor for adjusting the OMMT dispersion and distribution, the rheological and mechanical performances of the nanocomposites. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Effect of the compatibility on the morphology and properties of acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber/polypropylene thermoplastic vulcanizates

In this study, the morphologies of three types of acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (NBR)/polypropylene (PP) thermoplastic vulcanizates (TPVs) (with an NBR/PP blend ratio of 70/30) were compared. The TPVs were (1) an ultrafine fully vulcanized acrylonitrile–butadiene rubber (UFNBR)/PP TPV made by the mechanical blending of UFNBR with PP, (2) a dynamically vulcanized NBR/PP TPV without the compatibilization of maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene (MP) and amine‐terminated butadiene–acrylonitrile copolymer (ATBN), and (3) a dynamically vulcanized NBR/PP TPVs with the compatibilization of MP and ATBN. The influence of the compatibility therein on the size of the dispersed vulcanized NBR particles and the crystallization behavior of the PP in the TPVs and the resultant properties are also discussed. As indicated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, polarizing microscopy, dynamic mechanical thermal analysis, and rheological and mechanical testing, the compatibility was significantly improved by the reactive compatibilization of MP and ATBN, which led to a uniform and fine morphology. The compatibilization increased the crystallization rate and reduced the size of the spherulites of PP. On the other hand, it was found that the dispersed vulcanized NBR particles lowered the degree of crystallinity. The better the compatibility of the blend was, the lower the degree of crystallinity and the storage modulus were, but the higher the loss factor and the processing viscosity were. All TPVs showed almost the same oil resistance, but the TPV prepared with reactive compatibilization had the best mechanical properties. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

An investigation on recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP compatibilized blends: Rheological,morphological, and mechanical properties

The effectiveness of P(E‐co‐MA‐co‐GMA) as a compatibilizer for recycled PET/PP and recycled PET/PP‐EP (polypropylene (ethylene‐propylene) heterophase copolymer) blends was investigated by means of morphological (scanning electron microscopy), rheological (small amplitude oscillatory shear), mechanical (tensile, flexural and impact tests), and thermal (differential scanning calorimetry) properties. Compatibilizer concentration ranged from 1 to 5 wt % with respect to the whole blend. All blends were obtained in a 90/10 composition using a twin screw extruder. Compatibilization effects for PETr/PP‐EP were more pronounced due to ethylene segments present in both PP‐EP and P(E‐co‐EA‐co‐GMA). PETr/PP‐EP has shown greater dispersed phase size reduction, a more solid‐like complex viscosity behavior and larger storage modulus at low frequencies in relation to PETr/PP blend. For both investigated blends, mechanical properties indicated an improvement in both elongation at break and impact strength with increasing compatibilizer content. PETr/PP‐EP blends showed improved performance for the same level of compatibilizer content. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41892.     

Effects of different compatibilizers on the rheological,thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposites

The influence of two different compatibilizers and their combination (maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene, HDPE‐g‐MA; maleic anhydride grafted linear low density polyethylene, LLDPE‐g‐MA; and 50/50 wt % mixture of these compatibilizers) on the rheological, thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE/organoclay blend‐based nanocomposites was evaluated. Nanocomposites were obtained by melt‐intercalation in a torque rheometer in two steps. Masterbatches (compatibilizer/nanoclay 2:1) were obtained and subsequently diluted in the HDPE/LLDPE matrix producing nanocomposites with 2.5 wt % of nanoclay. Wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), steady‐state rheological properties, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to determine the influence of different compatibilizer systems on intercalation and/or exfoliation process which occurs preferentially in the amorphous phase, and thermomechanical properties. The LLDPE‐g‐MA with a high melt index (and consequently low viscosity and crystallinity) was an effective compatibilizer for this system. Furthermore, the compatibilized nanocomposites with LLDPE‐g‐MA or mixture of HDPE‐g‐MA and LLDPE‐g‐MA exhibited better nanoclay's dispersion and distribution with stronger interactions between the matrix and the nanoclay. These results indicated that the addition of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene facilitates both, the exfoliation and/or intercalation of the clays and its adhesion to HDPE/LLDPE blend. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 1726–1735, 2013