Seating discomfort for tractor operators – a critical review

A large number of studies have been conducted and researchers have suggested several criteria for evaluating discomfort and the suitability of a tractor seat in a given working condition. The studies have led to various parameters, viz. the body pressure distributed under and supporting both the buttocks, thighs and the back of an operator, control of posture in static or dynamic condition, ride vibration, exposure time on task and other factors. But in the absence of a more definitive and the most logical criteria particularly from biomechanical viewpoint, the researchers will continue to design conditions and procedures to understand the seat dynamics and evaluate the seating discomfort. Therefore, this paper reviews the research information available in this regard and attempts to set the most appropriate procedure for assessment of seating discomfort during tractor driving.

Relevance to industry

This paper attempts to project the most appropriate method of assessment and selection of tractor seats from engineering and biomechanical view point which could be adopted by the tractor seat manufacturers. It is designed to enhance the feeling of comfort, safety, convenience, and results in higher work output from the operator.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m x s(-2) rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

Qualitative models of seat discomfort including static and dynamic factors

Judgements of overall seating comfort in dynamic conditions sometimes correlate better with the static characteristics of a seat than with measures of the dynamic environment. This study developed qualitative models of overall seat discomfort to include both static and dynamic seat characteristics. A dynamic factor that reflected how vibration discomfort increased as vibration magnitude increased was combined with a static seat factor which reflected seating comfort without vibration. The ability of the model to predict the relative and overall importance of dynamic and static seat characteristics on comfort was tested in two experiments. A paired comparison experiment, using four polyurethane foam cushions (50, 70, 100, 120 mm thick), provided different static and dynamic comfort when 12 subjects were exposed to one-third octave band random vertical vibration with centre frequencies of 2.5 and 5.5 Hz, at magnitudes of 0.00, 0.25 and 0.50 m.s^-2 rms measured beneath the foam samples. Subject judgements of the relative discomfort of the different conditions depended on both static and dynamic characteristics in a manner consistent with the model. The effect of static and dynamic seat factors on overall seat discomfort was investigated by magnitude estimation using three foam cushions (of different hardness) and a rigid wooden seat at six vibration magnitudes with 20 subjects. Static seat factors (i.e. cushion stiffness) affected the manner in which vibration influenced the overall discomfort: cushions with lower stiffness were more comfortable and more sensitive to changes in vibration magnitude than those with higher stiffness. The experiments confirm that judgements of overall seat discomfort can be affected by both the static and dynamic characteristics of a seat, with the effect depending on vibration magnitude: when vibration magnitude was low, discomfort was dominated by static seat factors; as the vibration magnitude increased, discomfort became dominated by dynamic factors.     

Virtual optimisation of car passenger seats: Simulation of static and dynamic effects on drivers’ seating comfort

The virtual investigation of static and dynamic effects on seating comfort requires the application of an adequate human model. An appropriate seat model considering static and dynamic properties of the structure, the foam and the trim is needed to perform an optimisation for a lower load level on the driver. The evaluation of the seating comfort must be divided into a static and a dynamic part. For the computation of the relevant physical quantities with the human model CASIMIR and a detailed seat model, the finite-element solver ABAQUS (ABAQUS Inc., http://www.abaqus.comwww.abaqus.com) is used.

To reflect a real driving situation, in the first step the human model is adapted to the right posture, which is given by the inclination of the cushion and the backrest. The seating process is then computed by the load due to gravity. The static comfort is mainly evaluated by the seat pressure distribution. Results such as the H-point and the meat-to-metal value can give additional important informations for the ergonomic and structural design of the seat. As the model reflects the nonlinear properties and the finite-element solver considers the effects out of finite displacements and contact, a good correlation with measurement is achieved.

The dynamic simulation is carried out by a unit excitation of the seat slides at the clamping points. To consider frequency-dependent properties of foam, structure and the human body, the computation uses an implicit solver. Therefore the model is linearised after the nonlinear static seating process.

Dynamic comfort is evaluated by the seat-transfer function. The presented numerical method leads to a good correlation with the measurements. Superposing the results with real excitation signals enables the estimation of the dynamic loads as muscle or intervertebral disc forces on the driver.

Altogether this method, in an early state of the development enables the user to optimise a car passenger seat structure due to the static and dynamic comforts. Considering boundary conditions as higher load amplitudes and accelerations, the advantages of virtual development can also be applied for construction vehicle seats.

Relevance to Industry

The present method allows the evaluation of static and dynamic comforts in a virtual phase of seat development. Besides the reduction of time and costs, the application of the simulation enables the testing of new materials and ways of construction with low investment.     

Review of anthropometric considerations for tractor seat design

Tractor driving imposes a lot of physical and mental stress upon the operator. If the operator's seat is not comfortable, his work performance may be poor and there is also a possibility of accidents. The optimal design of tractor seat may be achieved by integrating anthropometric data with other technical features of the design. This paper reviews the existing information on the tractor seat design that considers anthropometry and biomechanical factors and gives an approach for seat design based on anthropometric data. The anthropometric dimensions, i.e. popliteal height sitting (5th percentile), hip breadth sitting (95th percentile), buttock popliteal length (5th percentile), interscye breadth (5th and 95th percentile) and sitting acromion height (5th percentile) of agricultural workers need to be taken into consideration for design of seat height, seat pan width, seat pan length, seat backrest width and seat backrest height, respectively, of a tractor. The seat dimensions recommended for tractor operator's comfort based on anthropometric data of 5434 Indian male agricultural workers were as follows: seat height of 380 mm, seat pan width of 420–450 mm, seat backrest width of 380–400 mm (bottom) and 270–290 mm (top), seat pan length of 370±10 mm, seat pan tilt of 5–7° backward and seat backrest height of 350 mm.

Relevance to industry

The approach presented in this paper for tractor seat design based on anthropometric considerations will help the tractor seat designers to develop and introduce seats suiting to the requirements of the user population. This will not only enhance the comfort of the tractor operators but may also help to reduce the occupational health problems of tractor operators.     

Study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vertical vibration

The influence of whole-body vertical vibration on the dynamic human–seat interface pressure is investigated using a flexible grid of pressure sensors. The ischium pressure and the overall pressure distribution at the human–seat interface are evaluated as functions of the magnitude and frequency of vibration excitation, and seated posture and height. The dynamic pressure at the seat surface is measured under sinusoidal vertical vibration of different magnitudes in the 1–10 Hz frequency range. Two methods based on ischium pressure and ischium force are proposed to study the influence of seat height, posture and characteristics of vibration. The results of the study reveal that the amplitude of dynamic pressure component increases with an increase in the excitation amplitude in almost entire frequency range considered in this study. The dynamic components of both the ischium pressure and the ischium force reveal peaks in the 4 to 5 Hz frequency band, the range of primary resonant frequency of the seated human body in the vertical mode. The mean values of the dynamic ischium pressure and the ischium force remain constant, irrespective of the excitation frequency and amplitude. The magnitudes of mean pressure and force at the human–seat interface, however, are dependent upon the seat height and the subject's posture. The inter-subject variability of the static ischium pressure and effective contact area are presented as functions of the subject weight and subject weight-to-height ratio. It was found that heavy subjects tend to induce low ischium pressure as a result of increased effective contact area.

Relevance to industry

Pressure distribution at the human–seat interface has been found to be an important factor affecting the seating comfort and work efficiency of various workers. The study of human–seat interface pressure distribution under vibration is specifically critical to the comfort, work efficiency and health of vehicle drivers, who are regularly exposed to vibration. The results reported in this paper will be useful to study dynamic response of the interface pressure and design vehicle seats.     

Evaluation of a new work seat for industrial sewing operations: results of three field studies

A newly developed work seat for industrial sewing operations was compared with a traditional sewing work seat to evaluate the effectiveness of design features. The new seat was designed with special seat-pan and backrest features to accommodate the musculoskeletal geometry of a low sit-stand posture. The seat-pan consisted of a pelvic support which supported the ischial tuberosities and areas behind them, and a thigh support which maintained the thighs at a 15 degrees downward angle, resulting in a 105 degrees trunk-thigh angle. The backrest consisted of a lumbar support which preserved lumbar lordosis and a thoracic support which supported the upper back during backward leaning. The traditional work seat was similar to an office chair (i e, a large horizontal seat-pan and a wide backrest) with the exception of having a higher than normal seat-height. This investigation consisted of three studies to compare the seats: (1) A user comfort and acceptance experiment which compared the initial psychophysical responses of 50 industrial sewers when introduced to the new seat; (2) a backrest usage experiment which compared the duration of backrest use among 10 industrial sewers; and (3) a follow-up experiment to evaluate chair preference after extended use of the new seat. The results of the user comfort and acceptance experiment found that the new work seat had greater comfort and user preference; the results of the backrest usage experiment found that the new seat had greater backrest use than the traditional seat; the results of the follow-up experiment found that the preference for the new seat was maintained over time and not due to a Hawthorne Effect.     

Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort

To improve the understanding of factors affecting automobile seat cushion comfort in static conditions (i.e. without vibration), relationships between the static physical characteristics of a seat cushion and seat comfort have been investigated. The static seat comfort of four automobile cushions, with the same foam hardness but diOEerent foam compositions, was investigated using Scheffe?s method of paired comparisons. The comfort judgements were correlated with sample stiOEness, given by the gradient of a force-deflection curve at 490 N (= 50 kgf). Samples with lower stiffness were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater stiffness. A similar comfort evaluation was conducted using five rectangular foam samples of the same composition but different foam hardness (and a wider range than in the first experiment). There was no linear relationship between the sample stiffness and seat comfort for these samples. Static seat cushion comfort seemed to be affected by two factors, a ‘bottoming feeling’ and a ‘foam hardness feeling’. The bottoming feeling was reflected in the sample stiffness when loaded to 490 N, while the foam hardness feeling was reflected in foam characteristics at relatively low forces. The pressures underneath the buttocks of subjects were compared with the comfort judgements. The total pressure over a 4 cm × cm area beneath the ischial bones was correlated with static seat comfort, even when the differences among samples were great; samples with less total pressure in this area were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater total pressure. It is concluded that the pressure beneath the ischial bones may reflect both comfort factors: the bottoming feeling and the foam hardness feeling.     

Factors affecting static seat cushion comfort.

To improve the understanding of factors affecting automobile seat cushion comfort in static conditions (i.e. without vibration), relationships between the static physical characteristics of a seat cushion and seat comfort have been investigated. The static seat comfort of four automobile cushions, with the same foam hardness but different foam compositions, was investigated using Scheffe's method of paired comparisons. The comfort judgements were correlated with sample stiffness, given by the gradient of a force-deflection curve at 490 N (= 50 kgf). Samples with lower stiffness were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater stiffness. A similar comfort evaluation was conducted using five rectangular foam samples of the same composition but different foam hardness (and a wider range than in the first experiment). There was no linear relationship between the sample stiffness and seat comfort for these samples. Static seat cushion comfort seemed to be affected by two factors, a 'bottoming feeling' and a 'foam hardness feeling'. The bottoming feeling was reflected in the sample stiffness when loaded to 490 N, while the foam hardness feeling was reflected in foam characteristics at relatively low forces. The pressures underneath the buttocks of subjects were compared with the comfort judgements. The total pressure over a 4 cm x 4 cm area beneath the ischial bones was correlated with static seat comfort, even when the differences among samples were great; samples with less total pressure in this area were judged to be more comfortable than samples with greater total pressure. It is concluded that the pressure beneath the ischial bones may reflect both comfort factors: the bottoming feeling and the foam hardness feeling.     

Quantitative prediction of overall seat discomfort

Static seat characteristics (seat stiffness) and dynamic seat characteristics (vibration magnitude) can both influence judgements of seat comfort. It is proposed that seat comfort can be predicted on the basis of Steven's psychophysical law: psi = kphi(n), where psi is a sensation magnitude, phi is the stimulus magnitude and k is a constant. The law is modified to: psi = a + bphis[n(s)] + cphiv[n(v)], where phis and phiv represent seat stiffness and vibration magnitude, n(s) and n(v) are exponents determined by the rate of increase in discomfort associated with the stiffness and vibration magnitude, and a, b and c are constants. The stiffness of foam loaded to 490 N may indicate static seat comfort, while the vibration dose value (VDV) on the seat surface may indicate vibration discomfort. Two experiments with 20 subjects investigated this approach. The first experiment with five magnitudes of vibration, three foams and a rigid wooden flat seat yielded 0.929 for the exponent, n(v), for VDV. In the second experiment subjects judged the overall seat discomfort while exposed six vibration magnitudes with the same four seating conditions. This experiment yielded 1.18 for the exponent, n(s), for seat stiffness. The overall prediction of seat discomfort was given by: psi = -50.3 + 2.68phis1.18 + 101phiv0.929. The prediction equation provided more accurate estimates of subject discomfort than models using either the VDV alone or the stiffness alone, especially when the vibration magnitude was low or the seats were similar. An interaction variable between the VDV and the stiffness slightly improved the prediction. The equivalence of the two stimuli was given by log10 (stiffness) = 0.787 log10 (VDV) + 1.34, or log10 (VDV) = 1.27 log10 (stiffness) - 1.70.     

A swivelling seat to improve tractor drivers' posture

Most agricultural equipment works behind the tractor, requiring the driver to spend a large proportion of his time looking backwards and adopting a poor posture. An evaluation was made of a mechanism that allowed a tractor seat to swivel up to 20 degrees from the normal forward facing position. Electromyographic techniques were used to monitor muscle activity during static laboratory experiments and angles of body twist were measured from photographic records in a separate study. The results showed a decrease in muscle activity in the shoulder and neck regions when the seat was swivelled up to 20 degrees. Measured angles of body twist showed that the potential benefit of swivelling the seat was not fully utilised by subjects although the mean twist between the shoulders and hips reduced significantly with increasing swivel angle. A subjective evaluation at three farms over a period of 6-12 months confirmed that a swivelling seat was of benefit to the driver, particularly for tasks requiring mainly rearward visual monitoring.     

Aspects to improve cabin comfort of wheel loaders and excavators according to operators

Comfort plays an increasingly important role in interior design of earth moving equipment. Although research has been conducted on vehicle interiors of wheel loaders and excavators, hardly any information is known about the operator's opinion. In this study a questionnaire was completed by machine operators to get their opinion about aspects which need to be improved in order to design a more comfortable vehicle interior. The results show that almost half of the operators rate the comfort of their cabin "average" or "poor". According to the operators, cab comfort of wheel loaders can be increased by improving seat comfort. Besides improving seat comfort, cabin comfort of excavators can be improved by changing the cab design (including dimensions, ingress/egress), view, reliability, and climate control.     

The effect of posture and seat suspension design on discomfort and back muscle fatigue during simulated truck driving

Several studies have shown a relationship between low-back problems and exposure to seated whole-body vibration. The amount of vibration transmitted to the operator is influenced by the posture of the subject in the vehicle. The aim of this study was to determine whether a truck seat with a gas spring in its suspension is superior to the standard spring seat in slowing the onset of muscle fatigue and reducing the level of discomfort experienced during road vibrations while maintaining typical driving postures. The experiment used a 2 x 3 (2 seats x 3 postures) repeated measures design. It was conducted on six males free from low-back pain. Subject comfort was rated before and directly after exposure to typical vibrations. Muscle fatigue using centre frequency was determined during vibration exposure, and the magnitude and phase of acceleration transfer were calculated from the base plate to the seat pan and from the seat pan to the bite bar. None of comfort, fatigue rate or fatigue average were affected by seat type or seat suspension design in the short term, 10 min vibration exposure. Fatigue and comfort measures could continue to be used to detect postural defects, but the more sensitive measures of seat/driver interactions remain mechanical ones using motion-measuring techniques such as accelerometry and correcting for the heavily damped nature of the system. Until more sophisticated manikins are available the characteristics of vibration-attenuating seats should be confirmed using live humans.     

An evaluation of comfort of a bus seat

The aim of this research was to evaluate the comfort of a passenger seat for a new type of bus. A fuzzy set model of a multistage comfort scale (MCS) was adopted for the assessment of comfort, together with the techniques of human back shape and EMG measurements as well as posture analysis. The subjects were 30 university students. It is concluded that MCS is a rapid but comprehensive evaluation method for single chair evaluation. The overall rating of MCS is 0.532, which is acceptable under the conditions of the prototype evaluation. The seat profile fits better with the back curve of subjects who had higher comfort rating in the way that the upper profile of the seat coincides with the human back curve and the lower part of the profile intersects the human back curve in the lumbar region; here the human back curves were measured in the slumped sitting posture. There was a significant difference in the EMGs of back muscles between the two sitting postures (sitting upright and the slumped sitting posture) at all the seat heights.     

Whole-body vibration: Measurement of horizontal and vertical transmissibility of an agricultural tractor seat

The seats may significantly reduce the exposures levels transmitted to the driver, but the European Directive 2002/44/EC (2002) requires only tests on the damping seat capacity along the vertical direction, whereas nothing is required for the longitudinal and transversal directions.Field tests were carried out using a 93 kW tractor to verify the vibrational comfort values given by seat with pneumatic suspension. The tests were executed with the tractor running on different surfaces, at two different forward speed and tire pressures and with different tractor masses. Three repetition were carried out for each configuration. Accelerations were always measured on both the seat and the cabin platform and the calculations were done using the ISO 2631 standard suggestions. The vibration total values and the acceleration transmissibility along the 3 perpendicular axes were calculated and analysed.Despite different boundary conditions (surface, tire pressure, forward speed and tractor mass distribution), along the Z axis the transmissibility was constantly around 0.7, to confirm that the seat worked well to damp the vertical exposures. Different were the situations for the X and the Y axes. Excluding the asphalt, on the other crossed surfaces high transmissibility values were observed (never less than 1), especially along the X axis.Relevance to industry. This paper describes the vibration transmissibility of an agricultural tractor seat. Tests were carried out with the tractor running on different surfaces and with different configurations. The seat transmissibility along the three orthogonal directions was acquired.Results suggest that the tractor manufacturer should consider, during the machine design, also the rolling and pitching movements, because the seat accelerations along the X and Y axes are influenced by them. The seat manufacturer could reduce the rolling and pitching effects using specific suspension systems along the horizontal and lateral directions.     

Perceived comfortable posture and optimum riding position of Indian male motorcyclists for short-duration riding of standard motorcycles

Dimensional incompatibility between rider and motorcycle is one of the most causative factors responsible for the prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort among motorcyclists. The present study aims to identify the comfortable riding posture (CRP) and optimum riding position (ORP) for improving motorcycle design for better riding experience. The data (through image processing technique) was acquired from 120 Indian male motorcyclists (aged 19–40 years) using a static simulator test-rig. The CRP was achieved by adjusting three controls (handgrip, seat, and footrest of the test-rig), and perceived comfort and discomfort ratings. Weighed mean comfort joint angles of ten body-joints defining CRP were estimated and compared with the earlier studies. The best possible ORP among the nine test conditions (defined by the positions of the three controls) was estimated using Taguchi DOE. The study outcomes will help automobile designers to conceptualize the comfortable standard motorcycles.     

Expected versus experienced neck comfort

There is certainly room for economy‐class travelers to make their trips more pleasant. A travel pillow might improve comfort. In this study, the comfort expectations and experience of travel pillows were examined. Comparing these 2 aspects indicated that it is not always possible to predict the comfort experience associated with a product based on a picture, and that there is a discrepancy between expected and experienced comfort. Experienced comfort is highest for travel pillows that restrict head movements in all directions in order to maintain a neutral posture. The results of this study also support earlier studies that suggested that discomfort experience can be predicted by observing the number of participants’ in‐seat movements; more movements result in higher experienced discomfort.     

Biomechanical model to predict loads on lumbar vertebra of a tractor operator

A biomechanical model is important for prediction of loads likely to arise in specific body parts under various conditions. The biomechanical model was developed to predict compressive and shear loads at L4/L5 (lumbar vertebra) of a tractor operator seating on seats with selected seat pan and backrest cushion materials. A computer program was written to solve the model for various inputs viz. stature and weight of the tractor operators, choice of operating conditions, and reaction forces from seat pan and backrest cushions. It was observed that maximum compressive and shear forces ranged 943–1367 N and 422–991 N, respectively at L4/L5 of tractor operators steering the tractor with leg and hand control actions and occasionally viewing the implement at back. The compressive forces were maximum (1202–1367 N) with coir based composite seat backrest cushion materials (thickness of 80 mm, density of 47.19 kg/m³) and were minimum (943–1108 N) with high density polyurethane foam (thickness of 44 mm, density of 19.09 kg/m³) for the seats.Relevance to industryThe biomechanical model of a tractor operator is important for theoretical understanding the problem of sitting and is also valuable in prediction of compressive and shear loads at L4/L5 of operator under various operating conditions. It will help in design of tractor seat for operator's comfort.     

Optimum seat pan and back-rest parameters for a comfortable tractor seat

An experimental set up was fabricated to measure the pressure distribution on the seat pan and back-rest of a tractor seat. Experiments were conducted with four different seat pans having radius of curvatures of 60, 75, 90 and cm, four backrests with radius of curvatures of 30, 60, 90 and cm, and three back-rest inclinations of 0°, 5° and 10° on representative Indian tractor operators. The subjective assessment of perceived comfort at the seat-operator interface was also recorded. Experiments were conducted in a randomized block design and the data obtained were analysed using suitable computer packages. Results indicate that all the parameters, namely seat pan, back-rest profile curvatures and the back-rest angle of inclination, affect the pressure distribution. It is concluded that a seat pan with radius of curvature 75cm, back-rest with radius of curvature 30 cm and back-rest inclination of 10° are the most suitable parameters for Indian tractor operators.     

Construction of parametric model of operator and workstation.

The purpose of development of a parametric model and the construction and formulation of the parametric model are described. To validate the parametric model, the distribution of the difference between the preferred and theoretical seat height settings of a number of office workers was evaluated from the standpoint of the static posture that does not change with time. The results of precise measurements made for an engineering workstation and an operator were also evaluated. Finally, the theoretical seat height settings with dynamic posture were evaluated. The validity of the parametric model was verified under the experimental conditions.