Quality of life, self‐care and sense of coherence in patients on hemodialysis: A comparative study

The number of patients treated for end-stage renal disease increases in Sweden like the rest of the world. During the last six years more than 1000 persons a year started renal replacement therapy. Today hemodialysis patients have the opportunity to choose different treatment modalities—home hemodialysis, self‐care dialysis, or conventional dialysis. Purpose:  The aim of the study was to investigate differences in patient on home hemodialysis, self‐care dialysis, and conventional dialysis regarding quality of life, self‐care, and sense of coherence. Methods:  Questionnaires were used: Short Form (SF‐36), Appraisal of Self‐Care Agency (ASA‐scale), and Sense of Coherence scale (SOC). 19 patients were included in the study (five patients on home hemodialysis, six self‐care patients, and eight patients on conventional dialysis). Results:  The results showed a tendency of higher scores in quality of life, self‐care, and sense of coherence for the home hemodialysis patients. Conclusion:  Since the number of participants in this study was low, it is necessary to include more patients in a future study in order to verify the results.     

Patient experiences and preferences on short daily and nocturnal home hemodialysis

Quotidian/intensive hemodialysis (short daily and nocturnal) has variable effects on health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by standard HRQOL tools. We sought to understand the perceived benefits and limitations of quotidian dialysis by interviewing patients who had switched from conventional to home quotidian dialysis. We used a qualitative, phenomenological approach to explore the perceived benefits of quotidian dialysis from 10 patients using either short daily or nocturnal hemodialysis at a tertiary health care center in London, Canada. The patients varied in gender, age, employment status, home support, physical capacity, primary cause of kidney disease, previous forms of renal replacement therapy, and level of education. Four major themes emerged: (1) improvement in physical and mental well‐being including better blood pressure and concentration, (2) increased control over patient's own life including time availability, choosing when to dialyze, and dialyzing at home, (3) decreased perception of being sick including returning to regular employment and avoiding sicker patients who must have in‐center dialysis, and (4) identification of the competencies and supports required for quotidian dialysis including ability to provide self‐care, supportive family, and medical support. Our findings suggest when patients' willingness and physical ability to use quotidian dialysis are coupled with education and support systems to assist patients' and families' self‐directed care, patients qualitatively perceive benefits of both increased physical and mental health, both measures of health‐related quality of life.     

Personal Support Worker (PSW)‐supported home hemodialysis: A paradigm shift

Introduction: Despite improving clinical outcomes associated with the use of home hemodialysis (HD), its utilization is low in most countries. The inability or unwillingness of patients and their families to participate in their own treatment is one of the most important barriers to the adoption of home HD. Methods: We hypothesized that paid helper‐delivered home HD supported by public funds would be successful and welcomed by patients and be delivered at an affordable cost. We conducted a pilot project to dialyze six patients at home using Personal Support Workers (PSW) and resolve regulatory, organizational and financial constraints. Findings: cWe provided publically‐funded PSW‐supported home HD to six patients. We describe the administrative structure of the pilot project allowing scalability and turnkey operation in the province of Ontario. Regulatory and insurance concerns were resolved and patients and staff were enthusiastic. The projected total dialysis cost, when economies of scale are met, are expected to be lower than the cost of in‐center HD. Discussion: A second phase of the project is currently under way including 8 hospitals and 67 patients. If equally successful, it may have significant implications for the delivery of care for End Stage Renal Disease in Ontario and similar jurisdictions. It promises to increase the utilization of home dialysis possibly at a lower cost than in‐center HD. This would be particularly important in providing dialysis in underserviced and geographically hard to access areas.     

The advantages and disadvantages of home hemodialysis

In Australia, 12% of the hemodialysis population dialyze at home. Until recently, the majority of these patients dialyzed for similar hours to those in satellite dialysis. However, in the past 5 years there has been a new departure such that in many centers the concept of home hemodialysis is now synonymous with extended hours dialysis. Registry data supports the concept that increased frequency and duration of dialysis may result in improved patient survival and a reduction in cardiovascular risk profile. It is hoped, therefore, that the long recognized survival benefit observed in home hemodialysis patients may be further augmented by the swing to extended hours dialysis in this patient population. In addition to the physiological benefits of extended hours home dialysis, there are clear quality of life, social, and economic advantages associated with dialyzing at home. There are however a number of perceived disadvantages to home hemodialysis including the application and time commitment required for training, the potential for relationship strain or "burnout," and reluctance to "hospitalize" the home. Overall, however, in this new era of extended hours dialysis, the advantages both physiological and lifestyle of home hemodialysis far outweigh the disadvantages.     

Nightly Home Hemodialysis: Fifteen Months of Experience in Lynchburg,Virginia

What constitutes adequate dialysis has been debated in the nephrology literature over the past eight years. The mortality rate of patients on dialysis in the United States is about 20% per year. We believed that short and infrequent dialysis sessions contributed to poor outcomes. To improve the results, Lynchburg Nephrology started the nightly home hemodialysis (NHHD) program in September 1997. Ten patients were trained in the first 15 months of the program. Patients dialyzed 7 – 9 hours, 6 nights/week, using the Fresenius 2008H machine. A standard dialysis solution with 2.0 mEq/L potassium, calcium concentration of 3.0 – 3.5 mEq/L was used. Dialysis solution flow rates were 200 – 300 mL/min. Serum phosphate levels were maintained above 2.5 mg/dL by adding 0 – 45 mL Fleet's Phosphosoda to the bicarbonate bath. Patients had marked improvement in quality of life as measured with the SF-36. Blood pressure was better controlled with fewer medications. All phosphate binders were eliminated. Caloric intake and protein intake increased to normal levels as measured by three-day dietary histories pre-NHHD, and at 3, 6, and 12 months on NHHD. Epoetin alfa dosages were reduced by about 50%. Nightly home hemodialysis should be considered as a valuable modality option for end-stage renal disease patients; it is potentially superior to conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis.     

Pathways to improve nephrologist comfort in managing patients on in-center or home self-care dialysis

In end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), patient engagement and empowerment are associated with improved survival and complications. However, patients lack education and confidence to participate in self-care. The development of in center self-care hemodialysis can enable motivated patients to allocate autonomy, increase satisfaction and engagement, reduce human resource intensiveness, and cultivate a curiosity about home dialysis. In this review, we emphasize the role of education to overcome barriers to home dialysis, strategies of improving home dialysis utilization in the COVID 19 era, the significance of in-center self-care dialysis (e.g., cost containment and empowering patients), and implementation of an in-center self-care dialysis as a bridge to home hemodialysis (HHD).     

Heparin Use in Daily Hemodialysis

More frequent dialysis is thought to be associated with increased heparin requirements; however, limited data are available which compare heparin requirements of conventional to daily dialysis. Objectives: To determine differences in heparin dose during conventional thrice‐weekly dialysis (CHD) compared to daily hemodialysis (DHD). Methods: All patients within the daily home hemodialysis at the Northwest Kidney Centers were evaluated for heparin dose both pre‐ and post initiation of daily hemodialysis. Patients on DHD received an initial bolus of heparin, without a continuous heparin drip, and supplemental heparin midway through the dialysis run as needed to maintain adequate activated clotting times (ACTs). CHD patients received a heparin bolus, followed by initiation of heparin drip as needed to maintain adequate ACTs. Results: Of the 1117 patients who dialyze at the NKC, 55% were Caucasian, 21% African‐American, 20% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 35% were of other ethnicity. The majority of patients were greater than 60 years (56%), while 36% ranged from 40–60 years and 13% ranged from 20–40 years. Male patients constituted 54% of patients. Diabetes was the primary cause of renal disease (36%), followed by hypertension (21%) and glomerular disease (18%). Of those patients in the home hemodialysis program (n = 45), 10 patients started daily home hemodialysis using the Aksys daily home hemodialysis system. Of those, the majority was male (100%), Caucasian (78.8%) with an average age of 46.7 ± 18 years. Glomerulonephritis was the primary cause of end‐stage renal disease (40%), while the percentages of other diseases were similar [Alport's syndrome (20%), hypertension (20%) and diabetes (10%)]. Compared to initial DHD heparin requirements (10,111 ± 2219 units), CHD heparin dose requirements (6833 ± 2715 units) were significantly lower (p = 0.045); however, total heparin needs were similar between groups (10,166 ± 4380 units vs. 10,778 ± 2959 units) (p = 0.324). Conclusion: Although patients initiating DHD have greater initial heparin requirements than when on CHD, total heparin doses remain similar to those required on conventional thrice‐weekly hemodialysis. Greater initial heparin doses required during short daily dialysis appear safe compared to those of conventional dialysis.     

Impact of advanced dialysis technology on the prevalence of dialysis‐related amyloidosis in long‐term maintenance dialysis patients

Dialysis‐related amyloidosis (DRA) is a unique type of amyloidosis (beta‐2 microglobulin) predominantly in end‐stage renal disease. Its clinical manifestations add to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in DRA manifestations when hemodialysis (HD) patients are treated with advanced HD technology, but changes of the course of DRA are uncertain. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in long‐term dialysis patients receiving either conventional or high‐flux, online‐produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. The cross‐sectional study included 147 HD patients (at least 10 years). The definitive diagnosis of CTS was made histologically or by the coexistence of CTS with other radiological DRA manifestations (bone cysts, arthropathies). The two HD patient groups did not differ significantly in age at start of HD, gender, major co‐morbid diseases, anuria, and dialysis vintage. The conventional HD group had significantly higher circulating beta‐2 microglobulin and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels. The prevalence of DRA was 68% for the conventional HD group and 28% for the advanced HD group. Duration of dialysis treatment was the only significant risk factor for the development of clinical DRA manifestations in both study groups, but CTS, bone cysts, or arthropathies occurred significantly earlier in conventional HD patients. The prevalence and severity of DRA have decreased with advances in dialysis technology during the last two decades, although its occurrence is simply delayed.     

What limits the expansion of self‐care dialysis at home?

Self-care dialysis at home, whether peritoneal dialysis or hemodialysis, is more cost-effective than in-center dialysis and treatment outcome is at least comparable. Still, both self-care modalities are considered underutilized and we wished to identify the perceived reasons for this underutilization among nephrology professionals. A questionnaire was distributed at 5 international nephrology meetings in 2006. Questions addressed the most important stakeholders and the most important issues for patients and nephrology professionals to enable the expansion of self-care dialysis and commonly mentioned barriers were given as alternative responses. The proportion of patients considered suitable for self-care was also investigated. Seven thousand responses were collected. The listed stakeholders, i.e., health care and reimbursement authorities, nurses and physicians, and finally patients and their families, are considered approximately equally important for the process. Nephrology professionals feel that patient motivation for choosing and performing self-care dialysis is the strongest driver. The need for dedicated resources for self-care is judged to be vital for the expansion of this modality of treatment. Thirty-two percent of incident patients are considered able to perform self-care dialysis at home. This international survey among 7000 nephrology professionals has identified patient motivation as one of the strongest drivers of self-care dialysis at home. The need for dedicated resources for the staff to devote time to developing such motivation is given as one of the major reasons for the slow adoption. Under ideal conditions, it is felt that one-third of all patients starting dialysis can be trained to perform self-care dialysis.     

Compliance, quality of life, and contributing factors in renal transplantation waiting list patients

Poor patient compliance is common during dialysis therapy. We aimed to study incidence of noncompliance, contributing factors, and effects on quality of life (QOL) among cadaveric renal transplantation waiting list patients. We included 86 renal transplantation waiting list patients (56M/30F). Dialysis duration, previous renal transplantation history, comorbid conditions, interdialytic weight gain, predialysis BUN, creatinine, potassium, and phosphate were recorded. Noncompliance criteria were skipping >1 dialysis session or shortening a dialysis session>10 min in 1 month, interdialytic weight gain>5.7% of body weight, predialysis serum potassium >6 mEq/L, and phosphate level >7.5 mg/dl. There were 49 noncompliant (age: 46.8 ± 21.8 years, HD duration: 83.9 ± 48.7 months) and 37 compliant (age: 42.8 ± 12.1 years, HD duration: 96.5 ± 45.2 months) patients. QOL was evaluated by short form 36 and depression levels by Beck Depression Inventory. Previous renal transplantation was present in 24.4% and comorbid diseases in 31.3% of all patients. In depressed patients, 77.8% had comorbid diseases. No difference was found between the groups considering age, gender, dialysis duration, previous transplantation history, and comorbid diseases (p > 0.05). Noncompliant patients had lower QOL (p < 0.04). Noncompliant patients had higher degree of depression (p = 0.01). QOL and Beck scores were negatively correlated (p = 0.001, r = −0.561). Noncompliance to diet and dialysis therapy is associated with depression, which further decreases QOL in renal transplantation waiting list patients. Early diagnosis of depression, is possible by monitoring noncompliance, and therapeutic intervention may benefit during the transplantation‐waiting period.     

Oral health of hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study at two German dialysis centers

The aim of the study was to investigate the oral hygiene behavior and state of oral health of hemodialysis (HD) patients in Germany. HD patients attending two dialysis centers were asked to participate in the study. Anamneses and oral hygiene behavior were recorded in a questionnaire. Dental examination included the dental status (DMF-T) and the degree of gingival inflammation (PDI: Periodontol Disease Index). Of 129 patients contacted, 54 (42%), aged 63.9 ± 13.0 years (23 women and 31 men), took part in the study. At an average, dialysis was required for 4.1 years. The cause of terminal renal failure was glomerulonephritis in 30% of patients and diabetic nephropathy in 22% of patients. Since dialysis therapy, 63% of the patients (n = 34) only visited a dentist when they had complaints. In 46 cases (85%), the dentist had been informed about the patient's requirement for dialysis, and in most cases (70%), the dental treatment took place on the day after dialysis. The mean DMF-T of the HD patients was 22.1 ± 6.5. The proportion of carious teeth was low (D-T: 0.7 ± 1.2), of missing teeth (M-T) high (16.2 ± 9.3). The median degree of gingival inflammation (PDI) was 1. Availing themselves of dental treatment after patients needed to have dialysis was mostly "complaint oriented." In addition to a high proportion of missing teeth, a good level of restoration of caries was found. The gingiva showed only a low level of inflammatory changes.     

Health-related qualıty of lıfe, sleep qualıty, and depressıon in peritoneal dialysis and hemodıalysıs patıents

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and sleep quality (SQ) were impaired in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The impairment of both HRQoL and SQ and being in a depressive mood were found to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality in dialysis patients. We aimed to investigate the association between SQ, HRQoL, and depression, and to define independent predictors of SQ and depression in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients. Ninety HD patients (41 females, 49 males with mean age 50 ± 15.7 years) and 64 PD patients (27 females, 37 males with mean age 52.4 ± 15.3 years) receiving renal replacement therapy for at least 3 months were screened for the assessment of SQ, HRQoL, and depression in this cross-sectional study. A modified postsleep inventory, Short Form of Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36) and Beck depression inventory (BDI) were applied to all patients for evaluating SQ, HRQoL, and depression, respectively. HD and PD patients had similar total SQ scores. Physical and mental component scale of HRQoL were found to be significantly higher in HD patients (p < 0.001). PD patients were found to be much more in depressive mood when compared with HD patients (p < 0.001). Independent predictors of depression in patients were mental component scale of HRQoL, gender (being female), and dialysis modality (being PD patient). Physical component scale was also found to be an independent predictor of SQ. This study showed that despite similar SQ scores between two groups, HD patients had better HRQoL and less depression than PD patients.     

Does a history of peritoneal dialysis result in an impaired gastrointestinal life quality?

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) invariably induces sclerotic changes in the peritoneal membrane. The impact of these changes on the well-being of PD patients has not been studied sufficiently. In a matched-pair analysis, the gastrointestinal life quality of patients with a history of PD was compared with end-stage renal disease patients who never performed PD, using a standardized questionnaire (gastrointestinal life-quality index [GLQI]). We identified all patients in our dialysis unit who underwent PD between 1989 and 2001 and who were alive in October 2001 (PD patients; n=53). Patients who were treated by hemodialysis (HD patients) were recruited as pairs. Hemodialysis and PD patients did not differ in gastrointestinal life quality (GLQI: HD 106.0+/-16.4 points; PD 104.0+/-16.7 points; p=0.70). Gastrointestinal life quality was neither correlated with the number of peritonitis episodes, nor with the duration of PD treatment. Peritoneal dialysis treatment is not associated with a long-term impairment of gastrointestinal life quality.     

Daily dialyses decrease plasma levels of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), a biomarker of left ventricular dysfunction

Brain natriuretic peptide or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) is a sensitive marker of heart disease. Plasma levels of BNP increase in left ventricular failure and determination of plasma BNP has become a useful tool in the diagnosis of heart failure. Hemodialysis (HD) patients may have elevated plasma levels of BNP, particularly predialysis, that correlate with echocardiographic signs of left ventricular dysfunction. High BNP levels are also a strong predictor of mortality in both nonrenal and HD patients. We studied plasma BNP levels in patients who changed from conventional thrice-weekly dialysis to daily dialysis 6 times a week while maintaining a total weekly time on dialysis of 12 hr. Twelve HD patients, mean age 55 years, had 4 hr of conventional thrice-weekly treatment for 4 weeks. Predialysis and postdialysis blood samples were obtained at the last dialysis. Patients were then dialyzed for 2 hr, 6 times weekly, for 4 weeks (daily dialysis). Again, predialysis and postdialysis blood samples were collected at the last HD. Brain natriuretic peptide plasma concentrations were determined by immunoradiometric assay. Predialysis BNP levels decreased from 194+/-51 ng/L (68+/-19 pmol/L; mean+SE) during thrice-weekly HD to 113+/-45 ng/L (41+/-18 pmol/L; p = 0.001) after 4 weeks on daily dialysis. With thrice-weekly HD, predialysis BNP levels were higher than postdialysis levels: 120+/-26 ng/L (39+/-8 pmol/L; p = 0.059). With daily dialysis, predialysis BNP levels did not differ significantly from postdialysis levels. Elevated predialysis plasma levels of BNP, considered sensitive and early markers of left ventricular dysfunction, decreased when patients were changed from conventional thrice-weekly HD to daily dialysis maintaining total hours of dialysis per week constant. Given the accumulated evidence that BNP is a biomarker of left ventricular dysfunction and can be used for risk stratification and guidance in pharmacotherapy of heart failure, daily dialysis appears to lead to less cardiac distress.     

Does the presence of an arteriovenous fistula alter changes in body water following hemodialysis as determined by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance assessment?

Multifrequency bioelectrical impedance assessments (MFBIAs) aid clinical assessment of hydration status for hemodialysis (HD) patients. Many MFBIA devices are restricted to whole body measurements and as many patients dialyze using arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), we wished to determine whether AVFs affected body water measurements. We reviewed pre‐ and post‐HD segmental MFBIA measurements in 229 patients attending for midweek HD sessions. Up to 144 were dialyzed with a left arm AVF (L‐AVF), 42 with a right arm AVF (R‐AVF), and 43 by central venous access catheter (CVC). Water content and lean tissue were greater in the left compared to right arm in those patients with L‐AVFs both pre and post dialysis (pre 2.1 ± 0.7 vs. 2.0 ± 0.7 L, and post 1.9 ± 0.6 vs. 1.8 ± 0.6 L and pre 2.65 ± 0.9 vs. 2.56 ± 0.8 kg, and post 2.34 ± 0.8 vs. 2.48 ± 0.8 vs. 2.34 ± 0.8 kg, respectively) and were also greater in the right compared to left arm for those patients dialyzing with R‐AVFs (pre‐HD 1.92 ± 0.5 vs. 1.86 ± 0.6 L and post‐HD 1.79 ± 0.5 vs. 1.7 ± 0.5 L, and pre‐HD 2.47 ± 0.6 vs. 2.38 ± 0.7 kg and post‐HD 2.3 ± 0.74 vs. 1.28 ± 0.7 kg, respectively), all Ps < 0.05. There were no significant differences in arm volumes or composition pre or post dialysis in those dialyzing with CVCs. Segmental MFBIA detects differences in arm water and lean mass in patients with AVFs. The presence on an AVF increases the water content in the ipsilateral arm both pre and post HD. This increased water content of the fistula arm will not be detected by whole body bioimpedance devices.     

Insights into nephrologist training, clinical practice, and dialysis choice

There is variable emphasis on dialysis-specific training among US nephrology fellowship programs. Our study objective was to determine the association between nephrology training experience and subsequent clinical practice. We conducted a national survey of clinical nephrologists using a fax-back survey distributed between March 8, 2010 and April 30, 2010 (N = 629). The survey assessed the time distribution of clinical practice, self-assessment of preparedness to provide care for dialysis patients at the time of certification examination, distribution of dialysis modality among patients, and nephrologists' choice of dialysis modality for themselves if their kidneys failed. While respondents spent 28% of their time caring for dialysis patients, 38% recalled not feeling very well prepared to care for dialysis patients when taking the nephrology certification examination. Sixteen percent obtained additional dialysis training after fellowship completion. Only 8% of US dialysis patients use home dialysis; physicians very well prepared to care for dialysis patients at the time of certification or who obtained additional dialysis training were significantly more likely to provide care to home peritoneal dialysis patients. Even though 92% of US dialysis patients receive thrice weekly in-center hemodialysis, only 6% of nephrologists selected this for themselves; selection of therapy for self was associated with dialysis modalities used by their patients. Nephrology training programs need to ensure that all trainees are very well prepared to care for dialysis patients, as this is central to nephrology practice. Utilization of dialysis therapies other than standard hemodialysis is dependent, in part, on training experience.     

Psychological Symptoms Are Greater in Caregivers of Patients on Hemodialysis Than Those of Peritoneal Dialysis

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare psychosocial characteristics in caregiving relatives (caregivers) of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Methods: Thirty‐three caregivers (17 women, 16 men) of HD patients, 27 caregivers (11 women, 16 men) of PD patients, and a control group of 49 subjects who do not care for family members with chronic illness (23 women, 26 men) are included in this study. The brief symptom inventory (BSI), social disability schedule (SDS), and brief disability questionnaire (BDQ) were used for the psychosocial evaluation. Results: The mean age, men‐to‐women ratios, duration of education, and distribution of marital status did not differ significantly among the three groups. In addition, dialysis duration and distribution of caregiver type were not different between the HD and PD groups. Although the mean global severity index scores of the three groups were similar, somatization and depression scores from BSI subitems were greater in the HD group than the scores of the PD and control groups. Although the mean SDS and BDQ scores were higher in the HD group, the differences did not achieve statistical significance. BSI subitems such as somatization, obsession–compulsion, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, and anxiety were positively correlated among themselves. Hostility and somatization were negatively correlated with age and education, respectively. Nevertheless, somatization was positively correlated with age. Social disability was negatively correlated with duration of education. Conclusion: Somatization and depression are greater in the caregivers of center HD patients compared to PD and control groups. According to the findings of this study, we suggest that caregiving family members of dialysis patients especially on HD also should be evaluated for psychosocial problems and supported as needed. Further studies are needed to explore whether psychosocial parameters of caregivers predict outcomes for caregivers and patients.     

Survival with short‐daily hemodialysis: Association of time,site, and dose of dialysis

In thrice‐weekly hemodialysis, survival correlates with the length of time (t) of each dialysis and the dose (Kt/V), and deaths occur most frequently on Mondays and Tuesdays. We studied the influence of t and Kt/V on survival in 262 patients on short‐daily hemodialysis (SDHD) and also noted death rate by weekday. Contingency tables, Kaplan‐Meier analysis, regression analysis, and stepwise Cox proportional hazard analysis were used to study the associations of clinical variables with survival. Patients had been on SDHD for a mean of 2.1 (range 0.1–11) years. Mean dialysis time was 12.9 ± 2.3 h/wk and mean weekly stdKt/V was 2.7 ± 0.5. Fifty‐two of the patients died (20%) and 8‐year survival was 54 ± 5%. In an analysis of 4 groups by weekly dialysis time, 5‐year survival continuously increased from 45 ± 8% in those dialyzing <12 hours to 100% in those dialyzing >15 hours without any apparent threshold. There was no association between Kt/V and survival. In Cox proportional hazard analysis, 4 factors were independently associated with survival: age in years Hazard Ratio (HR)=1.05, weekly dialysis hours HR=0.84, home dialysis HR=0.50, and secondary renal disease HR=2.30. Unlike conventional HD, no pattern of excessive death occurred early in the week during SDHD. With SDHD, longer time and dialysis at home were independently associated with improved survival, while Kt/V was not. Homedialysis and dialysis 15+ h/wk appear to maximize survival in SDHD.     

Effects of frequent hemodialysis on blood pressure: Results from the randomized frequent hemodialysis network trials

Hypertension is a common complication of chronic kidney disease and persists among most patients with end‐stage renal disease despite the provision of conventional thrice weekly hemodialysis (HD). We analyzed the effects of frequent HD on blood pressure in the randomized controlled Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. The daily trial randomized 245 patients to 12 months of 6× (“frequent”) vs. 3× (“conventional”) weekly in‐center hemodialysis; the nocturnal trial randomized 87 patients to 12 months of 6× weekly nocturnal HD vs. 3× weekly predominantly home‐based hemodialysis. In the daily trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered predialysis systolic blood pressure by ?7.7 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI): ?11.9 to ?3.5] and diastolic blood pressure by ?3.9 mmHg [95% CI: ?6.5 to ?1.3]. In the nocturnal trial, compared with 3× weekly HD, 2 months of frequent HD lowered systolic blood pressure by ?7.3 mmHg [95% CI: ?14.2 to ?0.3] and diastolic blood pressure by ?4.2 mmHg [95% CI: ?8.3 to ?0.1]. In both trials, blood pressure treatment effects were sustained until month 12. Frequent HD resulted in significantly fewer antihypertensive medications (daily: ?0.36 medications [95% CI: ?0.65 to ?0.08]; nocturnal: ?0.44 mediations [95% CI: ?0.89 to ?0.03]). In the daily trial, the relative risk per dialysis session for intradialytic hypotension was lower with 6×/week HD but given the higher number of sessions per week, there was a higher relative risk for intradialytic hypotensive requiring saline administration. In summary, frequent HD reduces blood pressure and the number of prescribed antihypertensive medications.     

Why Our Patients Like Daily Hemodialysis

The option of daily hemodialysis (HD) was discussed in November 1998 with a group of 35 HD patients on home or self‐care/limited‐care HD in a single, freestanding unit. After the meeting, 3 patients on home HD chose to switch to daily HD. The clinical success of the first patient and the immediate followers was one of the main reasons for further extension of this experience. At the time of this writing (February 2000), 10 patients were on a daily HD program (8 at home and 2 in a self‐care/limited‐care center) and one was in training for home daily HD. One further patient who tried 1 month of daily HD dropped out for logistic reasons. On daily HD, patients are dialyzed 2 – 3 hours/day, 6 days/ week, with blood flow of 270 – 300 mL/min, on bicarbonate dialysate with individually determined levels of Na and K. The schedule is flexible and a switch to 3 – 4 dialyses/week is occasionally allowed for working needs or for vacation. In addition to the well‐known clinical advantages (better well‐being, blood pressure control, nutrition, etc.), some patients preferred daily HD because of easier organization of daily activities, including work schedule. Patients initially feared frequent needle punctures and excessive burden on partners, but those concerns proved to be less a problem than anticipated. All current patients are willing to continue daily HD; only a nursing shortage limits further extension of the program in the self‐care/limited‐care center.