Multilayered core–shell structure of the dispersed phase in high‐impact polypropylene

The multiphase morphology of high impact polypropylene (hiPP), which is a reactor blend of polypropylene (PP) with ethylene–propylene copolymer, was investigated by transmission electron microscopy, selected area electron diffraction, atomic force microscopy, and field‐emission scanning electron microscopy techniques in conjunction with an analysis of the hiPP composition and chain structure based on solvent fractionation, ¹³C‐NMR, and differential scanning calorimetry measurements. A multilayered core–shell structure of the dispersed phase of hiPP in solution‐cast films and the bulk was observed. The inner core was mainly composed of polyethylene (including its long blocks) together with part of PP, the intermediate layer was ethylene–propylene random copolymer, and the outer shell consisted of ethylene–propylene multiblock copolymers. The formation process and controlling factors of the multilayered core–shell structure are discussed. This kind of multiphase morphology of hiPP caused the material to possess both a high rigidity and high toughness. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Influence of copolymerization conditions on the structure and properties of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys synthesized in gas‐phase with spherical ziegler‐natta catalyst

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly (ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys by sequential homopolymerization of ethylene, homopolymerization of propylene, and copolymerization of ethylene and propylene in gas‐phase. Different conditions in the third stage, such as the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture and the feed ratio of ethylene, were investigated, and their influences on the compositions, structural distribution and properties of the in‐reactor alloys were studied. Increasing the feed ratio of ethylene is favorable for forming random ethylene–propylene copolymer and segmented ethylene–propylene copolymer, however, slightly influences the formation of ethylene‐b‐propylene block copolymer and homopolyethylene. Raising the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture results in the increment of segmented ethylene–propylene copolymer, ethylene‐b‐propylene block copolymer, and PE fractions, but exerts a slight influence on both the random copolymer and PP fractions. The impact strength of PE/PP/EPR in‐reactor alloys can be markedly improved by increasing the feed ratio of ethylene in the ethylene–propylene mixture or increasing the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture. However, the flexural modulus decreases as the feed ratio of ethylene in the ethylene–propylene mixture or the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture increases. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2481–2487, 2006     

Study of crystallization and melting behavior of polypropylene‐block‐polyethylenes copolymers fractionated from polypropylene and polyethylene mixtures

A series of ethylene–propylene block copolymer fractions of differing compositions, while still retaining broad molecular weight distributions, were obtained by fractionation of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) copolymers prepared by sequential polymerization of ethylene and propylene. The crystallization and melting behavior of the polypropylene‐block‐polyethylene fractions were studied. It was observed that the major component could suppress crystallization of the minor component, leading to a decrease in crystallinity and melting temperature. Non‐isothermal crystallization showed that crystallization of the ethylene block was less influenced by composition and cooling rate than the propylene block. At fast cooling rates, the ethylene block could crystallize prior to the propylene block. Isothermal crystallization kinetics experiments were also conducted. We found that the block copolymers with minor ethylene components had smaller Avrami exponents (n ≈ 1.0), hence indicating a reduced growth dimension of the PE crystals by the pre‐existing PP crystals. On the other hand, the ethylene block exhibited much larger Avrami exponents in those block copolymers with major ethylene contents. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Effect of composition and component structure on thermal behavior and miscibility of polypropylene catalloys

The thermal behavior and the miscibility of an in‐situ polypropylene blend named polypropylene catalloys (PP‐cats) were investigated by using modulated differential scanning calorimeter (MDSC). It is found that all PP‐cats samples present two glass transitions, one of which is ascribed to the ethylene‐propylene random copolymer (EPR), and the other, to isotactic polypropylene (PP). However, no glass transition of ethylene‐propylene block copolymer (E‐b‐P) responsible for a third component in PP‐cats could be found. With the increase of EPR, the glass transition temperatures responding to PP and EPR components, T_g, _PP and T_g, _EPR, shift to low temperature, because of the enhancement of the interaction between PP and EPR component and the increase of ethylene content in EPR, respectively. Furthermore, the difference between T_g, _PP and T_g, _EPR remarkably decreases with the increase of the total ethylene content in PP‐cats, which indicates that the miscibility of PP‐cats is strongly dependent on the composition. Comparing the T_g, _PP and T_g, _EPR with T_g of fractionated PP and EPR, we ascribe the T_g change of PP fraction to the increase of EPR content; while that of EPR, to the increase of ethylene content in EPR. These experimental results suggest that the existence of E‐b‐P plays an important role in improving the miscibility between propylene homopolymer and EPR in PP‐cats. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Structure and morphology of a commercial high‐impact polypropylene in‐reactor alloy synthesized using a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A commercial high‐impact polypropylene (hiPP) was fractionated by temperature‐gradient elution fractionation into nine fractions. All fractions were studied using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry. The amount of ethylene in the fractions was also determined. The results demonstrate that the ethylene–propylene statistical copolymer (or ethylene–propylene rubber, EPR) content in this hiPP is rather low and the amounts of ethylene–propylene segmented copolymer and ethylene–propylene block copolymer (that act as adhesive and compatibilizer between elastomeric phase and matrix, respectively) are negligible. Furthermore, the morphology of the resin was studied using scanning electron microscopy observations of microtome‐cut original and etched samples, which reveals that EPR particles are too large and their distribution inside the matrix is not uniform. Copyright © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry     

Improving the antifouling properties of polypropylene surfaces by melt blending with polyethylene glycol diblock copolymers

Protein‐resistant polyethylene‐block‐poly(ethylene glycol) (PE‐b‐PEG) copolymers of different molecular weights at various concentrations were compounded by melt blending with polypropylene (PP) polymers in order to enhance their antifouling properties. Phase separation of the PE‐b‐PEG copolymer and its migration to the surface of the PP blend, was confirmed by attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared, X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and static water contact angle measurements. Enrichment of PEG chains at the surface of the blends increased with increasing PE‐b‐PEG copolymer concentration and molecular weight. The PP blends compounded with PE‐b‐PEG copolymer having the lowest molecular weight (875 g mol^?1), at the lowest concentration (1 wt %), gave the lowest bovine serum protein adsorption (30% less) compared to that of neat PP. At higher concentrations (5 and 10 wt %), and higher molecular weights (920, 1400, and 2250 g mol^?1), the PE‐b‐PEG copolymers leached‐out resulting in protein adsorption comparable to that of neat PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 46122.     

Structure and morphology of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloys synthesized by spherical high‐yield Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A series of spherical polyethylene/polypropylene (PE/PP) in‐reactor alloys were synthesized with spherical high‐yield Ziegler–Natta catalyst by sequential multistage polymerization in slurry. The morphology of PE/PP alloy granule was evaluated by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The results show PE/PP in‐reactor alloy with excellent morphology, high porosity, and narrow distribution of the particle size. The PE/PP in‐reactor alloys show excellent mechanical properties with good balance between toughness and rigidity. It was fractionated into five fractions by temperature‐gradient extraction fractionation, and every fractionation was analyzed by FTIR, ¹³C‐NMR, DSC, and WAXD. The PE/PP in‐reactor alloy was found to contain mainly five portions: PP, PE, segmented copolymer with PP and PE segment of different length, ethylene‐b‐propylene copolymer, and an ethylene–propylene random copolymer. The characteristic chain structure leads to good compatibility between the fractions of the alloy that shows a multiphase structure. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 2075–2085, 2007     

Probing into the pristine basic morphology of high impact polypropylene particles

In this paper, the pristine basic morphology of high impact polypropylene (hiPP) particles prepared with an industrial MgCl₂/TiCl₄ Ziegler–Natta catalyst undergoing sequentially occurred propylene (P) homopolymerization and ethylene (E)/propylene copolymerization has been probed mainly using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) techniques including plain TEM and the advanced transmission electron microtomography (TEMT). It is revealed that the basic structure units comprising a whole hiPP particle are the submicron PP (polypropylene) globule and nano-sized EP (ethylene-co-propylene) droplet. EP rubber (EPR) domain is formed by the agglomeration of EP droplets. Continually formed EP droplets turn to fill, from inside out, the micro- and macro-pores inside the preformed PP skeleton, affording different-sized EPR domains. Taking the two basic structure units into account, new quaternary structure model describing the manifold structures of hiPP particles has been proposed. From these findings, it is suggested that, to gain hiPP polymers with excellent stiffness/toughness-balanced properties, it is crucial to control the first-staged propylene homopolymerization alongside a rational design of the catalyst architecture to accomplish desired EPR dispersion morphologies that dictate hiPP properties.     

Structural characterization of reactor blends of polypropylene and ethylene‐propylene rubber

Blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐propylene rubber copolymer (EPR), and ethylene‐propylene crystalline copolymer (EPC) can be produced through in situ polymerization processes directly in the reactor and blends with different structure and composition can be obtained. In this work we studied the structure of five reactor‐made blends of PP, EPR, and EPC produced by a Ziegler‐Natta catalyst system. The composition of EPR was related to the ratio between ethylene and propylene used in the copolymerization step. The ethylene content in the EPR was in the range of 50–70 mol %. The crystallization behavior of PP and EPC in the blends was influenced by the presence of the rubber, and some specific interactions between the components could be established. By preparative temperature rising elution fractionation (P‐TREF) analysis, the isolation and characterization of crystalline EPC fractions were made. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2155–2162, 2004     

Chain structure of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloy synthesized in gas phase with spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst

Two polyethylene/polypropylene (PE/PP) in‐reactor alloy samples were synthesized by multi‐stage gas‐phase polymerization using a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst. The alloys show excellent toughness and stiffness. FTIR, ¹³C‐NMR and thermal analysis proved that the alloys are mainly composed of polyethylene, PE‐block‐PP copolymer and polypropylene. There are also a few percent of ethylene‐propylene segmented copolymer with very low crystallinity. The block copolymer fraction accounts for more than 25 % of the alloy. The role of the block copolymer as compatibilizer between PE and PP is believed to be the key factor that results in the excellent toughness–stiffness balance of the material. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compositional differences of propylene–ethylene block copolymers manufactured by degradation and hydrogenation techniques

The purpose of the present work is to investigate the compositional difference of polypropylene–polyethylene block copolymers (PP‐b‐PE) manufactured industrially by the process of degradation and hydrogenation, respectively. Each of the PP‐b‐PE copolymers was fractionated into three fractions with heptane and chloroform. The compositions of the three fractions were characterized by ¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, as well as differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermal fractionation. The results showed that the Chloroform‐soluble fraction was amorphous ethylene‐propylene rubber, and the content of the rubber in PP‐b‐PE manufactured by hydrogenation was less than that by degradation. The degree of crystallinity of the chloroform‐insoluble fraction of the PP‐b‐PE manufactured by hydrogenation is higher than that of by degradation. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 3301–3306, 2006     

Preparation and characterization of high MFR polypropylene and polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys

In this work, high melt flow rate (MFR) polypropylene (HF‐PP) and polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys (HF‐PP/EPR) with MFR ≈ 30 g/10 min were synthesized by spherical MgCl₂‐supported Ziegler–Natta catalyst with cyclohexylmethyldimethoxysilane (CHMDMS) or dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (DCPDMS) as external donor (De). The effects of De on polymerization activity, chain structure, mechanical properties, and phase morphology of HF‐PP and HF‐PP/EPR were studied. Adding CHMDMS caused more sensitive change of the polymers MFR with H₂ than DCPDMS, and produced PP/EPR alloys containing more random ethylene‐propylene copolymer (r‐EP) and segmented ethylene‐propylene copolymer (s‐EP). CHMDMS also caused formation of s‐EP with higher level of blockiness than DCPDMS. HF‐PP/EPR alloy prepared in the presence of DCPDMS exhibited higher flexural properties but lower impact strength than that prepared with CHMDMS. Toughening efficiency of the rubber phase was nearly the same in the alloys prepared using CHMDMS or DCPDMS as De, but stiffness of the alloy can be improved by using DCPDMS. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42984.     

Study on thermal behavior of impact polypropylene copolymer and its fractions

An impact polypropylene copolymer (IPC) was fractionated into three fractions using n‐octane as solvent by means of temperature‐gradient extraction fractionation. The glass transitions, melting, and crystallization behavior of these three fractions were studied by modulated differential scanning calorimeter (MDSC) and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). In addition, successive self‐nucleation and annealing (SSA) technique was adopted to further examine the heterogeneity and the structure of its fractions. The results reveal that the 50°C fraction (F₅₀) mainly consists of ethylene‐propylene random copolymer and the molecular chains may contain a few of short but crystallizable propylene and/or ethylene unit sequences; moreover, the lamellae thicknesses of the resulting crystals are extremely low. Furthermore, 100°C fraction (F₁₀₀) mainly consist of some branched polyethylene and various ethylene‐propylene block copolymers in which some ethylene and propylene units also randomly arrange in certain segments, and some polypropylene segments can form crystals with various lamellae thickness. An obvious thermal fractionation effect for F₁₀₀ samples after being treated by SSA process is ascribed to the irregular and nonuniform arrangement of ethylene and propylene segments. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Partial replacement of EPR by GTR in highly flowable PP/EPR blends: Effects on morphology and mechanical properties

This research analyzes the effect of ground tire rubber (GTR) and a novel metallocene‐based ethylene–propylene copolymer (EPR), with high propylene content, on the morphology and mechanical behavior of ternary polymer blends based on a highly flowable polypropylene homopolymer (PP). The PP/EPR blends morphology, with very small domains of EPR dispersed in the PP matrix, indicates a good compatibility among these materials, which leads to a significant improvement on elongation at break and impact strength. The incorporation of EPR on the rubber phase of thermoplastic elastomeric blends (TPE) based on GTR and PP (TPE^GTR) has a positive effect on their mechanical performance, attributed to the toughness enhancement of the PP matrix and to the establishment of shell‐core morphology between the rubber phases. The mechanical properties of the ternary blends reveal that TPE^GTR blends allow the upcycling of this GTR material by injection molding technologies. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42011.     

Influence of polymerization conditions on the structure and properties of polyethylene/polypropylene in‐reactor alloy synthesized in the gas phase with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of in‐reactor polyethylene/polypropylene alloys by polyethylene homopolymerization and subsequent homopolymerization of propylene in the gas phase. Different conditions in the ethylene homopolymerization stage, such as monomer pressure and polymerization temperature, were investigated, and their influences on the structure and properties of in‐reactor alloys were studied. Raising the polymerization temperature is the most effective way of speeding up polymerization and regulating the ethylene content of polyethylene (PE)/polypropylene (PP) alloys, but it will cause a greater increase in the PE‐b‐PP block copolymer fraction (named fraction D) than in the fraction of PP‐block‐PE in which the PP segments have low or medium isotacticity (named fraction A). Although changing ethylene monomer pressure could influence the ethylene content of PE/PP alloys slightly, it is an effective way of regulating the structural distribution. Reducing the monomer pressure will evidently increase fractions A and D. The mechanical properties of the alloys, including impact strength and flexural modulus, can be regulated in a broad range with changes in polymerization conditions. These properties are highly dependent on the amount, distribution, and chain structure of fractions A and D. The impact strength is affected by both fraction A and fraction D in a complicated way, whereas the flexural modulus is mainly determined by the amount of fraction A. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 101: 2136–2143, 2006     

Fabrication of polypropylene blends with excellent low‐temperature toughness and balanced toughness‐rigidity by a combination of EPR and SEEPS

To overcome serious rigidity depression of rubber‐toughened plastics and fabricate a rigidity‐toughness balanced thermoplastic, a combination of styrene‐[ethylene‐(ethylene‐propylene)]‐styrene block copolymer (SEEPS) and ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR) was used to toughen polypropylene. The dynamic mechanical properties, crystallization and melting behavior, and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/EPR/SEEPS blends were studied in detail. The results show that the combination of SEEPS and EPR can achieve the tremendous improvement of low‐temperature toughness without significant strength and rigidity loss. Dynamic mechanical properties and phase morphology results demonstrate that there is a good interfacial strength and increased loss of compound rubber phase comprised of EPR component and EP domain of SEEPS. Compared with PP/EPR binary blends, although neither glass transition temperature (T_g) of the rubber phase nor T_g of PP matrix in PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, the brittle‐tough transition temperature (T_bd) of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends decreases, indicating that the increased interfacial interaction between PP matrix and compound rubber phase is also an effective approach to decrease T_bd of the blends so as to improve low‐temperature toughness. The balance between rigidity and toughness of PP/EPR/SEEPS blends is ascribed to the synergistic effect of EPR and SEEPS on toughening PP. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135, 45714.     

New synthesis methods for polypropylene‐co‐ethylene‐propylene rubber

In this research, the reinforcement of polypropylene (PP) was studied using a new method that is more practical for synthesizing polypropylene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐propylene) copolymer (PP‐co‐EP), which can be used as a rubber toughening agent. This copolymer (PP‐co‐EP) could be synthesized by varying the feed condition and changing the feed gas in the batch reactor system using Ziegler–Natta catalysts system at a copolymerization temperature of 10°C. The ¹³C‐NMR tested by a 21.61‐ppm resonance peak indicated the incorporation of ethylene to propylene chains that could build up the microstructure of the block copolymer chain. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) results also confirmed these conclusions. Under these conditions, the morphology of copolymer trapped in PP matrix could be observed and the copolymer T_g would decrease when the amount of PP‐co‐EP was increased. DMA study also showed that PP‐co‐EP is good for the polypropylene reinforcement at low temperature. Moreover, the PP‐co‐EP content has an effect on the crystallinity and morphology of polymer blend, i.e., the crystallinity of polymer decreased when the PP‐co‐EP content increased, but tougher mechanical properties at low temperature were observed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 103: 3609–3616, 2007     

The effect of talc on the crystal orientation in polypropylene/ethylene‐propylene rubber/talc polymer blends in injection molding

The effect of tale on the b‐axis orientation of the polypropylene crystals in polypropylene (PP)/ethylene‐propylene rubber (EPR)/talc blends of injection moulding was examined using the X‐ray diffraction method. The b‐axes of the PP crystals were most strongly oriented in the thickness direction for the injection molded PP/EPR/talc blends. The b‐axis orientation in the thickness direction of injection moldings was promoted by increasing the concentration of talc, by reducing the particle size, or by purifying the tale. The dependence of the specimens' rigidity on talc content, particle size, and purity was also investigated. The rigidity depended on the degree of b‐axis orientation. The result of our investigated suggest that increasing the orientation of the PP crystals that are near talc particles may improve the rigidity.     

Characterization and properties of polypropylene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) synthesized by short‐period polymerization

The morphology and mechanical properties of novel block copolymers consisting of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) synthesized by a short‐period polymerization method were examined using differential scanning calorimetry, atomic force microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, and a rheooptical technique. It was found that the novel block copolymers show a single glass transition and EPR segments are trapped into the amorphous region of PP. Furthermore, the rheooptical analysis demonstrates that a drawing process of the EPR‐rich block copolymer induces orientation of the PP lamellae in the EPR matrix. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 958–964, 1999     

Influence of cocatalyst on the structure and properties of polypropylene/poly (ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys prepared by MgCl2/TiCl4/diester type Ziegler‐Natta catalyst

In this work, a series of polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) (iPP/EPR) in‐reactor alloys were prepared by MgCl₂/TiCl₄/diester type Ziegler‐Natta catalyst with triethylaluminium/triisobutylaluminium (TEA/TIBA) mixture as cocatalyst. The influence of cocatalyst and external electron donor, e.g., diphenyldimethoxysilane (DDS) or dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (D ‐donor), on the structure and mechanical properties of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloys were studied and discussed. According to the characterization results, PP/EPR was mainly composed of random poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), segmented poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene), and high isotactic PP. Using TEA/TIBA mixture as cocatalyst and DDS as external electron donor, as TEA/TIBA ratio increased, the impact strength of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloys had an increasing trend. Using TEA/TIBA mixture as cocatalyst and D ‐donor as external electron donor, the impact strength of iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloy were dramatically improved. In this case, the iPP/EPR in‐reactor alloy prepared at TEA: TIBA = 4 : 1 was the toughest. The influence of cocatalyst and external electron donor on the flexural modulus and flexural strength could be ignored. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011