Effects of compatibility between tackifier and polymer on adhesion property and phase structure: Tackifier‐added polystyrene‐based triblock/diblock copolymer blend system

The effects of compatibility of tackifier with polymer matrix and mixing weight ratio of triblock/diblock copolymers as the matrix on the adhesion property and phase structure of tackifier‐added polystryrene triblock/diblock copolymer blends were investigated. For this purpose, polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene‐block‐polystyrene triblock and polystyrene‐block‐polyisoprene diblock copolymers were used and the diblock weight ratio in the blend was varied from 0 to 1. Spherical polystyrene domains with a mean size of about 20 nm were dispersed in the polyisoprene (PI) continuous phase. In the case of the hydrogenated cycloaliphatic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with PI and a poor compatibility with polystyrene, the peel strength increased with an increase of the tackifier content, and the degree of increase became significant above 40 wt % of tackifier. It was found that the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier in the PI matrix were formed and the distance between the nearest neighbors of agglomerates was about 15 nm from SAXS measurement. The peel strength increased with an increase of the nanometer‐sized agglomerates of tackifier from TEM observation. On the other hand, in the case of the rosin phenolic resin as tackifier having a good compatibility with both polystyrene and PI, the peel strength increased effectively at the lower tackifier content, while no significant increase at higher tackifier content was observed. The agglomerates of tackifier were never confirmed in this system. The higher peel strength was obtained at the diblock weight ratio in the blend of 0.5–0.7 for both tackifier‐added systems. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Temperature dependence of tack and pulse NMR analysis of polystyrene block copolymer/tackifier system

The influence of tackifier structure on the temperature dependence of tack for a polystyrene block copolymer/tackifier system was investigated. A blend of polystyrene-block-polyisoprene-block- polystyrene triblock and polystyrene-block-polyisoprene diblock copolymers was used as the base polymer. Four different tackifiers were used: special rosin ester resin (RE), rosin phenolic resin (RP), hydrogenated cyclo-aliphatic resin (HC), and aliphatic petroleum resin (C5). Tack at 20?°C increased with the tackifier content for both RE and HC tackifier systems. Tack is affected by two factors: the work of adhesion at the adherend interface and the viscoelastic properties of the adhesive. The good balance of these two factors brought high tack. The adhesive with 10 wt.% tackifier exhibited the highest tack at 20?°C, whereas those with 30 and 50 wt.% tackifier were lower than those systems with 10 wt.% of the RP or C5 tackifiers. The adhesive with overly high hardness lowered the work of adhesion and the tack was not improved with more than 30 wt.%. A compatibility test in toluene solution and in solid state showed that tackifier RE has good compatibility with both polyisoprene and polystyrene, whereas tackifier RP has lower compatibility. Tackifiers HC and C5 had good compatibility with polyisoprene, but poor compatibility with polystyrene, and that of C5 was poorer. Pulse nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses indicated that tackifiers RE and HC effectively restrict the molecular mobility of polyisoprene phase.     

The effect of tackifier on phase structure and peel adhesion of a triblock copolymer pressure-sensitive adhesive

The role of tackifier on the adhesive properties of pressure-sensitive adhesive tape was investigated. For this purpose, a model system consisting of polystyrene-b-polyisoprene-b-polystyrene triblock copolymer and a tackifier was prepared. The hydrogenated cyclo-aliphatic resin, such as tackifier, which has poor compatibility with polystyrene increased the peel adhesion significantly. The increase became stronger above 40 wt% tackifier. Nanometer-sized agglomerates of tackifier were found in the polyisoprene matrix and these agglomerates increased in number with an increase in the tackifier content. The higher peel adhesion was obtained in the system with the larger amount of agglomerates of tackifier in the polyisoprene matrix. It was estimated that the tackifier dissolved with initial mixing at the molecular level in the polyisoprene matrix, enhancing the wettability of the adhesive, and separated out in the form of agglomerates over time, developing the cohesive strength. On the other hand, the rosin phenolic resin tackifier had good compatibility with polystyrene, and the peel adhesion increased effectively at the lower tackifier content. However, no significant additional increase at higher tackifier content was observed.     

Tack and viscoelastic properties of an acrylic block copolymer/tackifier system

The role of tackifier in a pressure sensitive adhesive tape was investigated. For this purpose, a model pressure sensitive adhesive was prepared using an acrylic block copolymer consisting of poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(butyl acrylate) as base polymer and a tackifier. The poly(butyl acrylate) oligomer was also used as a diluent to compare the effect on the adhesion properties. Tack was measured using a rolling tack tester in wide temperature and rolling rate ranges, and the master curve was made in accordance with the time–temperature superposition law. The tack increased and the failure mode varied from cohesive failure to interfacial failure with an increase in the rolling rate. The tack was higher in the tackifier added system than in the oligomer added system. From a dynamic mechanical analysis, the modulus at high temperature decreased by the addition of both tackifier and oligomer, however, the glass transition temperature of poly(butyl acrylate) and the modulus at low temperature increased only by the addition of tackifier. The dynamic viscoelastic properties were measured in wide temperature and frequency ranges, and the master curve was also made. The viscoelastic properties varied in the order of viscosity, rubbery and glassy with an increase in the deformation rate. It was clarified that the tack value and the failure mode were strongly dependent upon the viscoelastic properties of adhesive. Both tackifier and oligomer improves the mobility of base polymer, whereas, only tackifier increases the cohesive strength of base polymer.     

Fundamental Understanding in Rolling Ball Tack of Tackified Block Copolymer Adhesives

In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball tack is a very common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. This work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolling ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer(SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bulk properties of the adhesive.

Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Part of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to vary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is observed that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecular weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorporation of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent tends to produce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, and surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisoprene, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation.

Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an equation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball tack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these suggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.     

Fundamental Understanding in Rolling Ball Tack of Tackified Block Copolymer Adhesives

In the pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) industry, rolling ball tack is a very common tack test, which is simple, inexpensive and easy to operate. This work attempts to search for key parameter(s), which will affect the rolling ball tack of a PSA based on a blend of styrene-isoprene-styrene triblock copolymer(SIS) and hydrocarbon tackifier(s). We want to better understand whether this particular PSA performance is controlled by the surface or bulk properties of the adhesive.

Firstly, to test the contribution from the surface properties, we employ a model system of SIS/aliphatic tackifier in 1/1 wt. ratio as the control. Part of the tackifier in this PSA is then replaced by various amounts of low molecular weight diluents with different surface tensions. The idea is to vary the surface properties of the PSA because these low surface tension and low molecular weight diluents tend to migrate to the PSA surface. It is observed that the incorporation of a lower surface tension and a lower molecular weight diluent in the PSA tends to produce a larger increase in rolling ball tack compared with the unmodified PSA. On the other hand, the incorporation of a higher surface tension and a more compatible diluent tends to produce a larger increase in loop, peel and quick stick. Each diluent lowers the shear adhesion failure temperature (SAFT) of the diluent-modified PSA. These observations are explained in terms of tackifier molecular weight, and surface tension and compatibility of the various components (polyisoprene, tackifier, diluent and oil) in the adhesive formulation.

Secondly, to test the contribution from the bulk properties, we derive an equation for rolling ball tack in terms of the bulk viscoelastic behavior of the block copolymer PSA. However, experimental values of rolling ball tack do not follow this equation. Also, with increasing tackifier concentration in SIS, rolling ball tack has very different behavior compared with loop, peel, quick stick and probe tack. The latter set of performance criteria is known to be related to PSA bulk viscoelastic behavior. Therefore, these suggest that rolling ball tack is related more to the surface properties than to the bulk properties of the adhesive based on these results and those of the diluent-modified PSA systems.     

Influence of diblock addition on tack in a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system measured using a probe tack test

The influence of diblock copolymer addition on the tack properties of a polyacrylic triblock copolymer/tackifier system was investigated. For this purpose, poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐poly(n‐butyl acrylate)‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer consisting of the same components (MA) were used as base polymers, and a tackifier was added in amounts ranging from 10 to 30 wt %. The temperature dependence of tack was measured by a probe tack test. The tack of MAM/MA at room temperature was significantly higher than that of MAM, and the improvement of MAM/MA upon the addition of the tackifier was higher than that of MAM. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during the probe tack test was observed using a high‐speed microscope. It was found that for MAM/MA, cavitation was caused in the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed by the absorption of strain energy due to deformation of the adhesive layer. In contrast, for MAM, peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe. The greater flexibility of the soft block chain in the diblock copolymer resulted in improved interfacial adhesion. ¹H pulse nuclear magnetic resonance analysis showed that the addition of the tackifier improved the cohesive strength of the adhesive. Adhesion strength is affected by two factors: the development of interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength. In the MAM/MA/tackifier system, the presence of MA and the tackifier improved the interfacial adhesion and cohesive strength, respectively. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Tack and Shear Strength of Adhesives Prepared from Styrene-Butadiene Rubber (SBR) Using Gum Rosin and Petro Resin as Tackifiers

Tack and shear strength of styrene-butadiene rubber (SBR)-based pressure-sensitive adhesive were studied using gum rosin and petro resin as the tackifiers. The concentration of the tackifying resin was varied from 0 to 100 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr). Toluene was used as the solvent throughout the experiment. The rolling ball technique was used to measure the tack of the adhesive, whereas, shear strength was determined by a TA-HDi Texture Analyser. Results show that the tack of the adhesive increases with increasing tackifier loadings for both tackifier systems. However, shear strength indicates the reverse behavior with increasing resin content, an observation which is attributed to the decrease in cohesive strength as the tackifier concentration is increased. Both tack and shear strength of the adhesives increases with molecular weight of SBR. Adhesive containing petro resin consistently exhibits higher values than the gum rosin system due to better wettability and compatibility in the former system.     

Effects of hydrocarbon tackifiers on the adhesive properties of contact adhesives based on polychloroprene - III. The effect of the molecular weight of the tackifier

Aromatic hydrocarbon resins with different molecular weights (M_w = 1300-50400 daltons) were added to a solvent-based polychloroprene adhesive. The hydrocarbon resins were characterized using infra-red (IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements. The properties and compatibility of the polychloroprene/resin blends were studied using mechanical tests, DSC measurements, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and stress-controlled rheology. Tack measurements were also carried out and the adhesion strength was obtained from T-peel tests on roughened styrene-butadiene rubber/polychloroprene adhesive joints. The addition of low-molecular-weight tackifiers produced a compatible polychloroprene/tackifier system (only one T_g was found in DSC measurements), while the addition of a high-molecular-weight (and broad molecular weight distribution) tackifier produced a partially incompatible system (two Tg's were found in DSC measurements). The compatibility of polychloroprene/tackifier blends was also assessed with stress-controlled rheology and SEM. An increase in the T-peel strength and tack were produced when the molecular weight of the tackifier increased, although the addition of a hydrocarbon resin with a M_w higher than about 50 000 reduced the tack. A broad molecular weight distribution in the tackifier favoured incompatibility with the polychloroprene, resulting in a reduction in the tack and rheological properties.     

Miscibility and pressure‐sensitive adhesive performances of acrylic copolymer and hydrogenated rosin systems

Relationship between the miscibility of pressure‐sensitive adhesives (PSAs) acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin systems and their performance (180° peel strength, probe tack, and holding power), which was measured over a wide range of time and temperature, were investigated. The miscible range of the blend system tended to become smaller as the molecular weight of the tackifier increased. In the case of miscible blend systems, the viscoelastic properties (such as the storage modulus and the loss modulus) shifted toward higher temperature or toward lower frequency and, at the same time, the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance shifted toward the lower rate side as the T_g of the blend increased. In the case of acrylic copolymer/hydrogenated rosin acid systems, a somewhat unusual trend was observed in the relationship among the phase diagram, T_g, and the pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance. T_g of the blend was higher than that expected from T_gs of the pure components. This trend can be due to the presence of free carboxyl group in the tackifier resin. However, the phase diagram depended on the molecular weight of the tackifier. The pressure‐sensitive adhesive performance depended on the viscoelastic properties of the bulk phase. A few systems where a single T_g could be measured, despite the fact that two phases were observed microscopically, were found. The curve of the probe tack of this system shifted toward a lower rate side as the T_g increases. However, both the curve of the peel strength and the holding power of such system did not shift along the rate axis. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 71: 651–663, 1999     

Probing the viscoelastic properties of brominated isobutylene‐co‐p‐methylstyrene rubber/tackifier blends using a rubber process analyzer

The viscoelastic behavior of brominated isobutylene‐co‐p‐methylstyrene (BIMS) rubber/hydrocarbon resin blends and BIMS/phenol formaldehyde resin blends was studied with the use of a rubber process analyzer. Dynamic mechanical analysis and scanning electron microscopy were used to evaluate the compatibility between the BIMS/tackifier blends. Strain sweep tests at temperature below the softening point of the tackifiers showed the formation of resin–resin networks in the incompatible BIMS/phenolic resin blends. However, resin–resin network was not prominent in the case of the compatible BIMS/hydrocarbon resin blends. Frequency sweep tests were performed at the strain amplitude within the linear region at several temperatures and the variations of shear storage modulus, G′ and complex viscosity, η* against frequency were recorded. The tackifying resins modified the viscoelastic properties of the BIMS rubber by reducing the storage modulus at lower frequency and by increasing the storage modulus at higher frequencies. However, this action was found to be highly dependent on (a) rubber‐tackifier compatibility, (b) blend proportions, and (c) test temperature. Furthermore, stress relaxation measurements of the BIMS/tackifier blends at temperature below the softening point of the tackifiers showed longer period of relaxation for the incompatible BIMS/phenolic resin blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 2008. © 2008 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Compatibility and viscoelastic properties of brominated isobutylene‐co‐p‐methylstyrene rubber/tackifier blends

Brominated isobutylene‐co‐p‐methylstyrene (BIMS) rubber has been blended with hydrocarbon resin tackifier and alkyl phenol formaldehyde resin tackifier, and the compatibility between the blend components has been systematically evaluated. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) studies show that BIMS rubber and hydrocarbon resin tackifier blends are compatible at all blend proportions studied. However, BIMS rubber and phenol formaldehyde resin blends exhibit very limited compatibility with each other and phase separation even at very low phenolic tackifier concentration. Morphological studies of the rubber–resin blends by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) corroborate well with the DMA and DSC results. From the DMA frequency sweep and temperature sweep studies, it is shown that the hydrocarbon resin tackifier acts as a diluent and causes a decrease in the storage modulus values (by reducing the entanglement and network density) in the rubbery plateau region. On the other hand, phenol formaldehyde resin behaves in the way similar to that of the reinforcing filler by increasing the storage modulus values (by increasing the entanglement and network density) in the rubbery plateau zone. The relaxation time estimated from the different zones of frequency sweep master curves provides information about the influence of the two tackifiers on the viscoelastic properties of the BIMS rubber in the respective zones. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Viscoelastic and adhesion properties of EVA/tackifier/wax ternary blend systems as hot-melt adhesives

Two types of wax were added to a ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer/aromatic hydrocarbon resin (tackifier) blend in the molten state and the miscibility, viscoelastic and adhesion properties of ternary blends as hot-melt adhesives (HMAs) were investigated. Miscibility and viscoelastic properties were studied using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Brookfield viscometry and dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA), and their adhesion strength was determined in terms of single lap shear strength. DSC thermograms of both types of waxes showed their melting peaks in a similar region to that of EVA/tackfier blend. It was difficult to evaluate the miscibility of ternary blends using DSC because the melting peaks of the waxes overlapped with those of the EVA/tackifier blend, although the glass transition temperature (T _g) of the ternary blend systems slightly increased with increasing wax concentration. However, their storage modulus (E′) increased slightly and loss tangent (tan δ) showed different peaks when two types of wax were added to the EVA/tackifier blend. Therefore, the miscibility of EVA/tackifier blend altered with addition of waxes. In addition, their melt viscosity decreased with increasing wax concentration. Furthermore, the adhesion strength of the ternary blends decreased with increasing wax concentration, despite the increment of storage modulus. These results suggested that the ternary blends of EVA/tackifier/wax were heterogeneous.     

压敏胶带Loop Tack试验方法初探

以SBS(苯乙烯-丁二烯-苯乙烯嵌段共聚物)弹性体为热熔型压敏胶(PSA)的基体树脂,采用Loop Tack(环形或胶圈初粘力)法和斜面滚球法测定PSA的初粘力,并探讨了胶层厚度、PSA的储能模量以及黏贴材料的种类等对PSA初粘力测试结果的影响。结果表明:Loop Tack法中基材因折痕作用力给胶层施加了瞬间应力;在储能模量相差不大的情况下,斜面滚球法测试结果不理想的胶体却在Loop Tack测试中表现出良好的初粘力值;同一PSA在玻璃面板上测得的最大剥离力均大于镜面钢板上测得的数据(两者相差2.56%～6.12%)。     

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) copolymer on the properties of polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) blend

The effect of the addition of poly(styrene‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate) P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer on the properties of melt blended polylactide/poly(methyl methacrylate) (PLA/PMMA) 80/20 (wt %) composition was studied. In the literature high ductility levels were achieved by melt blending PLA with different additives. However, the gained ductility was counter balanced with drastic drops in strength and modulus values. The novelty of this work was the preparation of PLA‐based blends with polylactide content higher than 75 wt % which showed an impact resistance value improvement of about 60% compared with the neat PLA and maintained similar tensile strength and modulus values as well as glass transition temperature to neat PLA. The addition of only 3 pph of copolymer to PLA/PMMA blend improved the impact resistance almost 100%. The chemical reaction between PLA/PMMA blend and P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer were analyzed by FTIR, rotational rheometry, and GPC/SEC. Phase structure and morphology were studied by Differential Scanning Calorimetry and Scanning Electronic Microscopy. Tensile and impact properties as well as thermal stability were also studied. Results showed that as the amount of copolymer in the blend was increased then higher was average molecular weight and polydispersity index. After the addition of P(S‐co‐GMA) copolymer to the PLA/PMMA blend the impact resistance, elongation at break and thermal stability were improved while tensile strength and elastic modulus remained almost unaltered. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 43935.     

Influences of debonding rate and temperature on tack properties and peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system

The influences of debonding rate and temperature on the peel behavior of polyacrylic block copolymer/tackifier system were investigated. Poly(methyl methacrylate)-block-poly(n-butyl acrylate)-block-poly(methyl methacrylate) triblock copolymer (MAM) with hard block contents of 23 (MAM-23) and 16 wt.% (MAM-16) and a 1/1 blend with a diblock copolymer (MA) consisting of the same components (MAM-23/MA, total hard block content of 15 wt.%) were used as the base polymer. A special rosin ester was used as a tackifier at various contents in the block copolymer/tackifier system. The peeling process at the probe/adhesive interface during probe tack testing was observed using a high-speed microscope at 23 °C with debonding rate of 10 mm/s. Three different peeling mechanisms were observed. Type A, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe without cavitation (MAM-23). Type B, where peeling progressed linearly from the edge to the center of the probe with cavitation (MAM-16). Type C, where cavitation occurred over the entire adhesive layer, and peeling initiation was delayed (MAM-23/MA). The peel behavior of MAM-23 changed from Type A to Type B with a decrease of the debonding rate (1 mm/s) or increase of the temperature (40 °C). In contrast, there was no change for MAM-16 and MAM-23/MA. Cavity formation in an adhesive layer restrains peeling; therefore, it is desirable for improvement of the adhesion strength. The tack properties increased with the tackifier content, and the formation of cavitation was less than that for the systems without the tackifier.     

Adhesion properties of polyurethane pressure-sensitive adhesive

In this study, the adhesion properties of polyurethane (PUR) pressure-sensitive adhesive (PSA) were investigated. The PUR-PSA was prepared by the cross-linking reaction of a urethane polymer consisting of toluene-2,4-diisocyanate and poly(propylene glycol) components using polyisocyanate as a cross-linking agent. The peel strength increased with the cross-linking agent content and exhibited cohesive failure until the maximum value, after which it decreased with interfacial failure. The PUR-PSA exhibited frequency dependence of the storage modulus obtained from dynamic viscoelastic measurements, but did not show dependence of the tack on the rolling rate measured using a rolling cylinder tack test under the experimental conditions used, which is quite different from the acrylic block copolymer/tackifier system. The PUR-PSA showed strong contact time dependence of tack measured by a probe tack test. The tendency was significantly larger than for the acrylic block copolymer/tackifier system. Therefore, the storage modulus increased, whereas the interfacial adhesion seems to be decreased with increase in the rolling rate for this PUR-PSA system. It was estimated that the influence of rolling rate on the interfacial adhesion and the storage modulus was offset, and, as a result, the rolling cylinder tack did not exhibit rate dependency.     

Effects of miscibility and viscoelasticity on shear creep resistance of natural‐rubber‐based pressure‐sensitive adhesives

Natural rubber (NR) was blended in various ratios with 29 kinds of tackifier resins. Miscibilities of all the blend systems were illustrated as phase diagrams. From these blend systems, we selected 8 systems having typical phase diagrams (completely miscible, immiscible, lower critical solution temperature [LCST] types) and carried out measurements of shear creep resistance (holding power). Holding time was recorded as required time for the pressure‐sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape under shear load to completely slip away from the adherend. Holding time of miscible PSA systems tended to decrease as the tackifier content increased. This is attributable to a decrease in plateau modulus of the PSA with increasing tackifier content. There was rather large difference in holding time by tackifier among the miscible PSA systems; the reason for this is also considered to be a difference in plateau modulus. Holding time of an immiscible PSA system scarcely changed by tackifier content. But in another immiscible system, holding time tended to increase with increasing tackifier content. In fact, in the case of immiscible PSAs, the effect of tackifier content on holding time was different from tackifier to tackifier. This may be caused by difference in extent of phase separation. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 75: 1535–1545, 2000     

聚乙烯/石蜡油共混体系动态流变行为和相容性

将分子量相差较大的两种聚乙烯(PE)分别与石蜡油(LP)组成共混体系,通过旋转流变仪、偏光显微镜(PLM)、差示扫描量热仪(DSC)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)研究了温度和LP含量对共混体系动态流变行为的影响,并对两相共混体系的相容性及微孔结构进行了表征.结果表明,随着温度的升高和LP含量的增加,PE/LP共混体系的储能...     

Reactive blending of poly(L‐lactic acid) with poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol)

Poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA) was blended with poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) (EVOH) in the presence of an esterification catalyst to induce reaction between the hydroxyl groups of EVOH and the terminal carboxylic group of PLLA. Nascent low‐molecular‐weight PLLA, obtained from a direct condensation polymerization of L ‐lactic acid in bulk state, was used for the blending. Domain size of the PLLA phase in the graft copolymer was much smaller than that corresponding to a PLLA/EVOH simple blend. The mechanical properties of the graft copolymer were far superior to those of the simple blend, and the graft copolymer exhibited excellent mechanical properties even though the biodegradable fraction substantially exceeded the percolation level. The grafted PLLA reduced the crystallization rate of the EVOH moiety. Melting peak temperature (T_m) of the PLLA phase was not observed until the content of PLLA in the graft reaction medium went over 60 wt %. The modified Sturm test results demonstrated that biodegradation of EVOH‐g‐PLLA took place more slowly than that of an EVOH/PLLA simple blend, indicating that the chemically bound PLLA moiety was less susceptible to microbial attack than PLLA in the simple blend. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 98: 886–890, 2005