One-step analytical method for required reinforcement stiffness of vertical reinforced soil wall with given factor of safety on backfill soil

The selection of geosynthetic reinforcements in the design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) retaining walls has been based on the requirement on the long-term strength. However, the mobilized loads in the reinforcements are related to both the reinforcement stiffness and soil deformation, and the desired factor of safety may not exist in the earth structure if they are not properly considered. Therefore, it is also important to take into account the long-term reinforcement stiffness when designing GRS retaining walls. In this study, a simplistic analytical method is proposed to determine the required reinforcement stiffness with given factor of safety on the backfill soil. The method takes into account soil-reinforcement interaction, nonlinear stress-strain behavior of soil, and soil dilatancy. The reinforcement strains predicted by the proposed method were compared to those analyzed by validated nonlinear Finite Element analyses, and close agreement was obtained.     

Soil-reinforcement interaction: Stress regime evolution in geosynthetic-reinforced soils

Understanding the stress regime that develops in the vicinity of reinforcements in reinforced soil masses may prove crucial to understanding, quantifying, and modeling the behavior of a reinforced soil structures. This paper presents analyses conducted to describe the evolution of stress and strain fields in a reinforced soil unit cell, which occur as shear stresses are induced at the soil-reinforcement interface. The analyses were carried out based on thorough measurements obtained when conducting soil-reinforcement interaction tests using a new large-scale device developed to specifically assess geosynthetic-reinforced soil behavior considering varying reinforcement vertical spacings. These experiments involved testing a geosynthetic-reinforced mass with three reinforcement layers: an actively tensioned layer and two passively tensioned neighboring layers. Shear stresses from the actively tensioned reinforcement were conveyed to the passively tensioned reinforcement layers through the intermediate soil medium. The experimental measurements considered in the analyses presented herein include tensile strains developed in the reinforcement layers and the displacement field of soil particles adjacent to the reinforcement layers. The analyses provided insights into the lateral confining effect of geosynthetic reinforcements on reinforced soils. It was concluded that the change in the lateral earth pressure increases with increasing reinforcement tensile strain and reinforcement vertical spacing, and it decreases with increasing vertical stress.     

Residual Deformation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Sand in Plane Strain Compression Affected by Viscous Properties of Geosynthetic Reinforcement

A series of plane strain compression (PSC) tests were performed on large sand specimens unreinforced or reinforced with prototype geosynthetic reinforcements, either of two geogrid types and one geocomposite type. Local tensile strains in the reinforcement were measured by using two types of strain gauges. Sustained loading (SL) under fixed boundary stress conditions and cyclic loading (CL) tests were performed during otherwise monotonic loading at a constant strain rate to evaluate the development of creep deformation by SL and residual deformation by CL of geosynthetic-reinforced sand and also residual strains in the reinforcement by these loading histories. It is shown that the creep deformation of geosynthetic-reinforced sand develops due to the viscous properties of both sand and geosynthetic reinforcement, while the residual deformation of geosynthetic-reinforced sand during CL (defined at the peak stress state during CL) consists of two components: i) the one by the viscous properties of sand and reinforcement; and ii) the other by rate-independent cyclic loading effects with sand. The development of residual deformation of geosynthetic-reinforced sand by SL and CL histories had no negative effects on the subsequent stress-strain behaviour and the compressive strength was maintained as the original value or even became larger by such SL and CL histories. The local tensile strains in the geosynthetic reinforcement arranged in the sand specimen subjected to SL decreased noticeably with time, due mainly to lateral compressive creep strains in sand during SL of geosynthetic-reinforced sand. This result indicates that, with geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures designed to have a sufficiently high safety factor under static loading conditions because of seismic design, it is overly conservative to assume that the tensile load in the geosynthetic reinforcement is maintained constant for long life time. Moreover, during CL of geosynthetic-reinforced sand, the residual tensile strains in the geosynthetic reinforcement did not increase like global strains in the geosynthetic-reinforced sand that increased significantly during CL. These different trends of behaviour were also due to the creep compressive strains in the lateral direction of sand that developed during CL of geosynthetic-reinforced sand.     

Model tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with marginal backfill subjected to rainfall

A series of model tests were conducted to investigate the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls with marginal backfill subjected to rainfall infiltration. The effectiveness of improvement measures—such as decreasing reinforcement spacing and increasing sand cushion thickness—to prevent the GRS wall failure due to heavy rainfall was evaluated. The distribution and variation of the volumetric water content, porewater pressure, wall deformation, and reinforcement tensile strain were monitored during the test. The advancement of the wetting front and the drainage function of sand cushions were visually observed using the fluorescent dyeing technique. For the baseline case, the wall began to deform as rainfall proceeded, causing the potential failure surface to gradually move backward. When the potential failure surface moved beyond the reinforced zone, the pullout of the topmost reinforcement layers occurred, resulting in the collapse of the GRS wall in a compound failure mode. Decreases in reinforcement spacing and increases in sand cushion thickness effectively reduced wall deformation and enhanced wall stability. The placing of sand cushions between the reinforcement layers can also delay water infiltration and reduce the accumulation of porewater pressure inside the wall. Suggestions for designing rain-resistant GRS walls are also proposed based on the findings.     

A new generation of soil-geosynthetic interaction experimentation

A new device was developed to comprehensively assess the interaction between soil and reinforcement as well as the interaction between neighboring reinforcement layers in a reinforced soil mass, under both working and ultimate interface shear stress conditions. An understanding of these two interactions is required to assess the mechanical behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil mass considering varying vertical reinforcement spacings. Specifically, the new device allows direct visualization of the kinematic response of soil particles adjacent to the geosynthetic reinforcement layers, which facilitates evaluation of the soil displacement field via digital image analysis. Evaluation of the soil displacement field allows quantification of the extent of the shear influence zone around a tensioned reinforcement layer. Ultimately, the device facilitates investigating the load transfer mechanisms that occur not only at the soil-reinforcement interface, but also at distances farther from the interface, thereby providing additional insight into the effect of vertical reinforcement spacing on a reinforced soil mass. Finally, the device allows monitoring of dilatancy within the reinforced soil mass upon shear stress generation at the interface between soil and reinforcement. Overall, the device was found to provide the measurements needed to adequately predict the strains developing both in reinforcement layers tensioned by direct application of external loads as well as in reinforcement layers tensioned by the shear transfer induced by adjacent geosynthetic reinforcements. Ultimately, the proposed experimentation technique allows generation of data required to evaluate the load transfer mechanisms amongst soil and reinforcement layers in reinforced soil structures. The strain magnitude in the neighboring reinforcements was found to exceed a magnitude of 10% of the strain magnitude obtained in the active reinforcement. The zone of shear stress transfer from the soil-reinforcement interface was found to exceed 0.2 m on each side of the active reinforcement.     

Effect of infiltration on the performance of an unsaturated geotextile-reinforced soil wall

A full-scale geotextile-reinforced soil wall was built in order to assess the characteristics of water infiltration and its effect on the structure performance. Nonwoven geotextiles were selected as inclusions in order to provide not only reinforcement, but also internal drainage to the fine-grained soil used as backfill material. The structure was built in a laboratory setting, which facilitated implementation of a thorough instrumentation plan to measure volumetric water content changes of soil, suction, facing displacements and reinforcement strains. An irrigation system was used to simulate controlled rainfall events. The monitoring program allowed the evaluation of the advancement of infiltration and internal geosynthetic drainage. Evaluation of the effect of the hydraulic response on the overall performance of the structure included assessment of the development of capillary breaks at soil-geotextiles interfaces. Capillary breaks resulted in water storage above the geotextile reinforcements and led to retardation of the infiltration front in comparison to the infiltration that would occur without the presence of permeable reinforcements. After breakthrough, water was also found to migrate along the geotextiles, suggesting that the reinforcement layers ultimately provided in-plane drainage capacity. While generation of positive pore water pressures was not evidenced during the tests, the advancing infiltration front was found to affect the performance of the wall. Specifically, infiltration led to increasing reinforcement strains and facing displacements, as well as to the progressive loss of suction. While the accumulation of water due to the temporary capillary break also resulted in an increased backfill unit weight, its effect on deformation of the wall was not possible to be captured but it is intrinsic on the overall behavior observed in this study. Correlations between reinforcement strains/face displacement and the average of suction in the backfill soil, as measured by tensiometers in different locations within the backfill mass, point to the relevance of the suction as a representative indicator of the deformability of the geotextile-reinforced wall subjected to water infiltration. Reinforcement strains and face displacements were found to reduce more significantly with reduction of suction until a certain value of suction from which the rate of decreasing declines.     

Novel experimental techniques to assess the time-dependent deformations of geosynthetics under soil confinement

A new experimental approach to assess the impact of soil confinement on the long-term behavior of geosynthetics is presented in this paper.The experimental technique described herein includes a novel laboratory apparatus and the use of different types of tests that allow generation of experimental data suitable for evaluation of the time-dependent behavior of geosynthetics under soil confinement.The soil-geosynthetic interaction equipment involves a rigid box capable of accommodating a cubic soil mass under plane strain conditions.A geosynthetic specimen placed horizontally at the mid-height of the soil mass is subjected to sustained vertical pressures that,in turn,induce reinforcement axial loads applied from the soil to the geosynthetic.Unlike previously reported studies on geosynthetic behavior under soil confinement,the equipment was found to be particularly versatile.With minor setup modifications,not only interaction tests but also in-isolation geosynthetic stress relaxation tests and soil-only tests under a constant strain rate can be conducted using the same device.Also,the time histories of the reinforcement loads and corresponding strains are generated throughout the test.Results from typical tests conducted using sand and a polypropylene woven geotextile are presented to illustrate the proposed experimental approach.The testing procedure was found to provide adequate measurements during tests,including good repeatability of test results.The soilegeosynthetic interaction tests were found to lead to increasing geotextile strains with time and decreasing reinforcement tension with time.The test results highlighted the importance of measuring not only the time history of displacements but also that of reinforcement loads during testing.The approach of using different types of tests to analyze the soilegeosynthetic interaction behavior is an innovation that provides relevant insight into the impact of soil confinement on the time-dependent deformations of geosynthetics.     

Earth pressure coefficients for reinforcement loads of vertical geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under working stress conditions

Based on the nonlinear elastic theory and stress-dilatancy theory, two earth pressure coefficients were proposed to analyze the reinforcement loads at the potential failure surface of vertical geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls under working stress conditions. The earth pressure coefficients take into account the force equilibrium and compatible deformations between soil and reinforcement, and can be obtained by solving two implicit functions by an iterative or graphic method. The effects of backfill compaction and facing restriction are taken into account in the earth pressure coefficients by two additional stress factors, which have been derived analytically using straightforward approaches. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, comparisons were made with the results from large scale tests and numerical simulations. It was demonstrated that the reinforcement loads predicted by the proposed methods were in good agreement with the experimental or numerical results.     

A novel 2D-3D conversion method for calculating maximum strain of geosynthetic reinforcement in pile-supported embankments

For design of a geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) embankment over soft soil, the methods used to calculate strains in geosynthetic reinforcement at a vertical stress were mostly developed based on a plane-strain or two-dimensional (2-D) condition or a strip between two pile caps. These 2-D-based methods cannot accurately predict the strain of geosynthetic reinforcement under a three-dimensional (3-D) condition. In this paper, a series of numerical models were established to compare the maximum strains and vertical deflections (also called sags) of geosynthetic reinforcement under the 2-D and 3-D conditions, considering the following influence factors: soil support, cap shape and pattern, and a cushion layer between cap and reinforcement. The numerical results show that the maximum strain in the geosynthetic reinforcement decreased with an increase of the modulus of subgrade reaction. The 2-D model underestimated the maximum strain and sag in the geosynthetic reinforcement as compared with the 3-D model. The cap shape and pattern had significant influences on the maximum strains in the geosynthetic reinforcements. An empirical method involving the geometric factors of cap shape and pattern, and the soil support was developed to convert the calculated strains of geosynthetic reinforcement in piled embankments under the 2-D condition to those under the 3-D condition and verified through a comparison with the results in the literature.     

Reinforcement load and deformation mode of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls subject to seismic loading during service life

A Finite Element procedure was used to investigate the reinforcement load and the deformation mode for geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls subject to seismic loading during their service life, focusing on those with marginal backfill soils. Marginal backfill soils are hereby defined as filled materials containing cohesive fines with plasticity index (PI) >6, which may exhibit substantial creep under constant static loading before subjected to earthquake. It was found that under strong seismic loading reinforced soil walls with marginal backfills exhibited a distinctive “two-wedge” deformation mode. The surface of maximum reinforcement load was the combined effect of the internal potential failure surface and the outer surface that extended into the retained earth. In the range investigated, which is believed to cover general backfill soils and geosynthetic reinforcements, the creep rates of soils and reinforcements had small influence on the reinforcement load and the “two-wedge” deformation mode, but reinforcement stiffness played a critical role on these two responses of GRS walls. It was also found that the “two-wedge” deformation mode could be restricted if sufficiently long reinforcement was used. The study shows that it is rational to investigate the reinforcement load of reinforced soil walls subject to seismic loading without considering the previous long-term creep.     

Characterization of geogrid mechanical and chemical properties from a thirty-six year old mechanically-stabilized earth wall

The mechanical properties of geosynthetic reinforcements are known to be time-, environment- and stress-dependent. Characterization of these reinforcement properties is often assessed under controlled laboratory settings and extrapolated to the design life of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. However, despite the wide application of geosynthetic reinforcement in earth retaining structures, there is limited evaluation of how mechanical properties of geosynthetic materials change in situ on constructed works; and primarily limited to case studies within the first decade following construction. This study describes the change in mechanical properties of geogrids retrieved from the facing of the wrapped-face of one of the oldest geosynthetic-reinforced mechanically-stabilized earth (MSE) walls in the United States, constructed in 1983 in a relatively harsh, coastal environment. Laboratory characterization of mechanical and chemical properties of the geogrid are presented, and compared to properties of archived samples, as well as samples from another structure exhumed 8 and 11 years after its respective construction. The laboratory test results demonstrate that the geogrid mechanical and chemical properties have not significantly changed in the 35+ years of service. While the data from this study represents a limited set of conditions, these results demonstrate that geogrids may perform well long after construction.     

Analyzing the influence of facing batter on reinforcement loads of reinforced soil walls under working stress conditions

The level of reinforcement loads in a reinforced soil retaining wall is important to its satisfactory operation under working stress conditions since it basically determines the wall deformation. Consequently, proper estimation of the reinforcement load is a necessary step in the service limit-state design of this type of earth retaining structures. In this study, a force equilibrium approach is proposed to quantify the influence of facing batter on the reinforcement loads of reinforced soil walls under working stress conditions. The approach is then combined with a nonlinear elastic approach for GRS walls without batter to estimate the reinforcement loads neglecting toe restraint. The approximate average mobilized soil strength in the retaining wall is employed in the force equilibrium analysis. The predictions of reinforcement loads by the proposed method were compared to the experimental results from four large-scale tests. It is shown that the proposed semianalytical approach has the capacity to reproduce the reinforcement loads with acceptable accuracy. Some remaining issues are also pinpointed.     

Influence of uncertainty in geosynthetic stiffness on deterministic and probabilistic analyses using analytical solutions for three reinforced soil problems

The paper examines the quantitative influence of uncertainty in the estimate of geosynthetic reinforcement stiffness on numerical outcomes using analytical solutions for a) the maximum outward facing deformation in mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls, b) maximum reinforcement tensile loads and strain in MSE walls under operational conditions, and c) the mobilized reinforcement stiffness in a geosynthetic layer used to reinforce a fill over a void. The stiffness of the reinforcement is modelled using an isochronous two-parameter hyperbolic load-strain model. A linear relationship between isochronous stiffness and the ultimate tensile strength of the reinforcement is used to estimate reinforcement stiffness when product-specific creep data are not available at time of design. Solution outcomes are presented deterministically and probabilistically. The quantitative link between nominal factor of safety used in deterministic working stress design practice and reliability index is provided. The latter is preferred in modern performance-based design to quantify margins of safety within a probabilistic framework. Finally, the paper highlights the practical benefit of using product-specific isochronous secant stiffness data when available, rather than estimates of isochronous stiffness values based on reinforcement type or pooled data.     

An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand

This research was performed to investigate the behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced sandy soil foundations and to study the effect of different parameters contributing to their performance using laboratory model tests. The parameters investigated in this study included top layer spacing, number of reinforcement layers, vertical spacing between layers, tensile modulus and type of geosynthetic reinforcement, embedment depth, and shape of footing. The effect of geosynthetic reinforcement on the vertical stress distribution in the sand and the strain distribution along the reinforcement were also investigated. The test results demonstrated the potential benefit of using geosynthetic-reinforced sand foundations. The test results also showed that the reinforcement configuration/layout has a very significant effect on the behavior of reinforced sand foundation. With two or more layers of reinforcement, the settlement can be reduced by 20% at all footing pressure levels. Sand reinforced by the composite of geogrid and geotextile performed better than those reinforced by geogrid or geotextile alone. The inclusion of reinforcement can redistribute the applied footing load to a more uniform pattern, hence reducing the stress concentration, which will result reduced settlement. Finally, the results of model tests were compared with the analytical solution developed by the authors in previous studies; and the analytical solution gave a good predication of the experimental results of footing on geosynthetic reinforced sand.     

Stability assessment of 3D reinforced soil structures under steady unsaturated infiltration

Internal stability assessment of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures (GRSSs) has been commonly carried out assuming plane-strain conditions and dry backfills. However, failures of GRSSs usually show three-dimensional (3D) features and occur under unsaturated conditions. A procedure based on the kinematic limit-analysis method is proposed herein to assess 3D effects and the role of steady unsaturated infiltration on the required geosynthetic strength for GRSSs. A suction stress-based framework is used to describe the soil stress behavior under steady unsaturated infiltration. Based on the principle of energy-work balance, the required geosynthetic strength is determined. A comparison analysis with the prior research is conducted to verify the developed method. Two kinds of backfills, i.e., high-quality backfill and marginal backfill, are considered for comparison in this work. It is shown that accounting for 3D effects and the role of unsaturated infiltration considerably reduces the required geosynthetic strength. The 3D effects are primarily affected by the width-to-height ratio of GRSSs, and the contribution of unsaturated infiltration is mainly influenced by the soil type, flow rate, GRSS's height, and location of the water table.     

关于土工合成材料加筋设计的若干问题

目前土工合成材料加筋技术被广泛应用,但人们对于加筋土中筋材与土间的相互作用的机理的认识还不够深入,因而在设计中总体上趋于保守。结合岩土工程的设计理论,指出土工合成材料在设计方法方面的不合理性;对于加筋挡土墙、加筋土坡、加筋软土地基上的土堤和桩网结构的设计分别进行了讨论;结合一些案例中的实测和预计的筋材应变和应力,进一步指出目前设计的保守性。最后指出,目前基于极限平衡法的设计不尽合理,而通过变形协调的筋土共同作用的研究,采用更能反映其相互作用机理的设计方法是非常必要的。     

Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology

The advantages of geosynthetic-reinforcing technology to construct new soil structures including; (a) a relatively short construction period; (b) small construction machines necessary; and (c) a higher stability of completed structures, all contributing to a higher cost-effectiveness, are addressed. A number of case successful histories of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls have been reported in the literature (e.g., [Tatsuoka, F., Koseki, J., Tateyama, M., 1997a. Performance of Earth Reinforcement Structures during the Great Hanshin Earthquake, Special Lecture. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, IS Kyushu ‘96, Balkema, vol. 2, pp. 973–1008; Tatsuoka, F., Tateyama, M, Uchimura, T., Koseki, J., 1997b. Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls as important permanent structures, 1996–1997 Mercer Lecture. Geosynthetics International 4(2), 81–136; Tatsuoka, F., Koseki, J., Tateyama, M., Munaf, Y., Horii, N., 1998. Seismic stability against high seismic loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining structures, Keynote Lecture. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp.103–142; Helwany, S.M.B., Wu, J.T.H., Froessl, B., 2003. GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 21(3), 177–196; Lee, K.Z.Z., Wu, J.T.H., 2004. A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(4), 181–204; Yoo, C., Jung, H.-S., 2004. Measured behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall in a tiered configuration. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(5), 359–376; Kazimierowicz-Frankowska, K., 2005. A case study of a geosynthetic reinforced wall with wrap-around facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23(1), 107–115; Skinner, G.D., Rowe, R.K., 2005. Design and behaviour of a geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall and bridge abutment on a yielding foundation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23(3), 234–260]). Techniques for analyzing the seismic response of reinforced walls and slopes have also been developed (e.g. Nouri, H. Fakher, A., Jones, C.J.F.P., 2006. Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24(2),175–187). Several typical cases in which embankments having a gentle slope and conventional-type soil retaining walls that were seriously damaged or failed were reconstructed to geosynthetic-reinforced steepened slopes or geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls are also reported in this paper. It has been reported that the reconstruction of damaged or failed conventional soil structures to geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures was highly cost-effective in these cases. Rehabilitation of an old earth-fill dam in Tokyo to increase its seismic stability by constructing a counter-balance fill reinforced with geosynthetic reinforcement is described. Finally, a new technology proposed to stabilize the downstream slope of earth-fill dams against overflowing flood water while ensuring a high seismic stability by protecting the slope with soil bags anchored with geosynthetic reinforcement layers arranged in the slope is described.     

双面加筋路堤的地震动力响应分析

双面加筋路堤作为加筋土挡土墙的一种衍生结构,沿袭了加筋土挡土墙优良的抗震性能,被广泛应用于道路建设工程,然而国内外关于双面加筋路堤的抗震设计还不够完善,采用的基于极限平衡法的抗震设计仍存在诸多问题。采用基于PLAXIS软件的有限元分析方法,对双面加筋路堤进行了较为全面的动力特性分析,结果表明,地震作用下双面加筋路堤的各层筋材最大内力分布、单侧面板侧移形式及路面沉降形式同单一的加筋土挡土墙表现形式相似;通过对不同宽高比结构筋材内力的分析得出,在地震作用下,加筋区及非加筋区之间存在第二潜在破裂面发育的可能。基于单自由度强迫振动理论及数值分析结果,建立了整体最大筋材内力与地震动及结构参数的关系。     

Upper bound seismic limit analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced unsaturated soil walls

The assessment of the internal stability of geosynthetic-reinforced earth retaining walls has historically been investigated in previous studies assuming dry backfills. However, the majority of the failures of these structures are caused by the water presence. The studies including the water presence in the backfill are scarce and often consider saturated backfills. In reality, most soils are unsaturated in nature and the matric suction plays an important role in the wall's stability. This paper investigates the internal seismic stability of geosynthetic-reinforced unsaturated earth retaining walls. The groundwater level can be located at any reinforced backfill depth. Several nonlinear equations relating the unsaturated soil shear strength to the matric suction and different backfill type of soils are considered in this study. The log-spiral failure mechanism generated by the point-to-point method is considered. The upper-bound theorem of the limit analysis is used to evaluate the strength required to maintain the reinforced soil walls stability and the seismic loading are represented by the pseudo-dynamic approach. A parametric study showed that the required reinforcement strength is influenced by several parameters such as the soil friction angle, the horizontal seismic coefficient, the water table level, the matric suction distribution as well as the soil types and the unsaturated soils shear strength.     

Evaluation of permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil through laboratory tests

The objective of this paper is to examine the permeability characteristics of geosynthetic layers under confinement with soils having relatively low permeability. For this purpose, a large permeameter was custom designed and a series of permeability tests were carried-out by varying soil type and number of geosynthetic layers. Further, effect of provision of sand cushion and the thickness of sand cushion on permeability characteristics was also examined. Normal stress was increased in intervals of 50 kPa up to 200 kPa. With an increase in normal stress, a decrease in the permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil was observed. The permeability characteristics were found to improve significantly with the provision of sand cushion and an increase in its thickness. Based on the definition of equivalent coefficient of permeability of stratified soils for parallel flow, an equation for estimating coefficient of permeability of soil–geosynthetic system with and without sand cushion is proposed. Considering the application of geosynthetics in reinforced slopes and walls with low-permeable backfill soils, a suitable geosynthetic with a thin layer of sand cushion is recommended. This in turn can also help in enhancing the pore-water pressure dissipation.