Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2

This paper assesses the three leading technologies for capture of CO₂ in power generation plants, i.e., post-combustion capture, pre-combustion capture and oxy-fuel combustion. Performance, cost and emissions data for coal and natural gas-fired power plants are presented, based on information from studies carried out recently for the IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme by major engineering contractors and process licensors. Sensitivities to various potentially significant parameters are assessed.     

The environmental impact and risk assessment of CO2 capture, transport and storage - An evaluation of the knowledge base

In this study, we identify and characterize known and new environmental consequences associated with CO₂ capture from power plants, transport by pipeline and storage in geological formations. We have reviewed (analogous) environmental impact assessment procedures and scientific literature on carbon capture and storage (CCS) options. Analogues include the construction of new power plants, transport of natural gas by pipelines, underground natural gas storage (UGS), natural gas production and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects. It is investigated whether crucial knowledge on environmental impacts is lacking that may postpone the implementation of CCS projects. This review shows that the capture of CO₂ from power plants results in a change in the environmental profile of the power plant. This change encompasses both increase and reduction of key atmospheric emissions, being: NO_x, SO₂, NH₃, particulate matter, Hg, HF and HCl. The largest trade-offs are found for the emission of NO_x and NH₃ when equipping power plants with post-combustion capture. Synergy is expected for SO₂ emissions, which are low for all power plants with CO₂ capture. An increase in water consumption ranging between 32% and 93% and an increase in waste and by-product creation with tens of kilotonnes annually is expected for a large-scale power plant (1 GW_e), but exact flows and composition are uncertain. The cross-media effects of CO₂ capture are found to be uncertain and to a large extent not quantified. For the assessment of the safety of CO₂ transport by pipeline at high pressure an important knowledge gap is the absence of validated release and dispersion models for CO₂ releases. We also highlight factors that result in some (not major) uncertainties when estimating the failure rates for CO₂ pipelines. Furthermore, uniform CO₂ exposure thresholds, detailed dose-response models and specific CO₂ pipeline regulation are absent. Most gaps in environmental information regarding the CCS chain are identified and characterized for the risk assessment of the underground, non-engineered, part of the storage activity. This uncertainty is considered to be larger for aquifers than for hydrocarbon reservoirs. Failure rates are found to be heavily based on expert opinions and the dose-response models for ecosystems or target species are not yet developed. Integration and validation of various sub-models describing fate and transport of CO₂ in various compartments of the geosphere is at an infant stage. In conclusion, it is not possible to execute a quantitative risk assessment for the non-engineered part of the storage activity with high confidence.     

Can ‘negative net CO2 emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas?

The article analyses to what extent ‘negative net CO₂ emissions’ from decarbonised biogas-to-electricity can contribute to solving Poland’s carbon capture and sequestration dilemmas. From the criteria-based evaluation of low-carbon power technologies it is found, that biogas-to-electricity is among technologies having increasing production potential in Poland. Therefore, in future biogas will be able to contribute to solving Poland’s CCS dilemmas, because it offers carbon-neutral electricity. Moreover, by applying CCS into biogas-to-electricity the ‘negative net CO₂ emissions’ can be achieved. The article examines three biogas-to-electricity technologies involving CO₂ capture, i.e. biogas-to-biomethane, biogas-to-CHP and biogas-to-electricity via the ORFC cycle. It is emphasised that the ORFC cycle offers low-cost CO₂ separation from a CO₂-H₂ mixture, low O₂-intensity, and the opportunities for advanced mass and energy integration of involved processes. Besides, energy conversion calculations show that the ORFC cycle can offer comparable cycle efficiency with air- and oxy-combustion combined cycles. In regard to the design of biogas-based energy systems it is recommended to include (i) distributed production of biogas in order to avoid costs of long-distance transportation of high-moisture content biomass and (ii) centralised large-scale decarbonised biogas-to-electricity power plants since costs of pipeline transportation of gases are low but large-scale plants could benefit from increased energy and CCS efficiencies.     

MCFC-based CO2 capture system for small scale CHP plants

Carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere are considered among the main reasons of the greenhouse effect. The largest share of CO₂ is emitted by power plants using fossil fuels. Nowadays there are several technologies to capture CO₂ from power plants' exhaust gas but each of them consumes a significant part of the electric power generated by the plant. The Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell (MCFC) can be used as concentrator of CO₂, due to the chemical reactions that occurs in the cell stack: carbon dioxide entering into the cathode side is transported to the anode side via CO₃⁼ ions and is finally concentrated in the anodic exhaust. MCFC systems can be integrated in existing power plants (retro fitting) to separate CO₂ in the exhaust gas and, at the same time, produce additional energy. The aim of this study is to find a feasible system design for medium scale cogeneration plants which are not considered economically and technically interesting for existing technologies for carbon capture, but are increasing in numbers with respect to large size power plants. This trend, if confirmed, will increase number of medium cogeneration plants with consequent benefit for both MCFC market for this application and effect on global CO₂ emissions. System concept has been developed in a numerical model, using AspenTech engineering software. The model simulates a plant, which separates CO₂ from a cogeneration plant exhaust gases and produces electric power. Data showing the effect of CO₂ on cell voltage and cogenerator exhaust gas composition were taken from experimental activities in the fuel cell laboratory of the University of Perugia, FCLab, and from existing CHP plants. The innovative aspect of this model is the introduction of recirculation to optimize the performance of the MCFC. Cathode recirculation allows to decrease the carbon dioxide utilization factor of the cell keeping at the same time system CO₂ removal efficiency at high level. At anode side, recirculation is used to reduce the fuel consumption (due to the unreacted hydrogen) and to increase the CO₂ purity in the stored gas. The system design was completely introduced in the model and several analyses were performed. CO₂ removal efficiency of 63% was reached with correspondent total efficiency of about 35%. System outlet is also thermal power, due to the high temperature of cathode exhaust off gases, and it is possible to consider integration of this outlet with the cogeneration system. This system, compared to other post-combustion CO₂ removal technologies, does not consume energy, but produces additional electrical and thermal power with a global efficiency of about 70%.     

Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture

This paper presents a summary of technical-economic studies. It allows evaluating, in the French context, the production cost of electricity derived from coal and gas power plants with the capture of CO₂, and the cost per tonne of CO₂ avoided. Three systems were studied: an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC), a conventional combustion of Pulverized Coal (PC) and a Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC). Three main methods were envisaged for the capture of CO₂: pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion.For the IGCC, two gasification types have been studied: a current technology based on gasification of dry coal at 27 bars (Shell or GE/Texaco radiant type) integrated into a classical combined cycle providing 320 MWe, and a future technology (planned for about 2015–2020) based on gasification of a coal–water mixture (slurry) that can be compressed to 64 bars (GE/Texaco slurry type) integrated into an advanced combined cycle (type H with steam cooling of the combustion turbine blades) producing a gross power output of 1200 MWe.     

Stakeholder perceptions of CO2 capture and storage in Europe: Results from a survey

During 2006, a survey was conducted of European energy stakeholders (industry, government, environmental non-governmental organizations (NGOs), researchers and academicians and parliamentarians). A total of 512 responses was received from 28 countries as follows: industry (28%), research (34%), government (13%), NGOs (5%) and parliamentarians (4%). Three-quarters of the sample thought that widespread use of CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) was ‘definitely’ or ‘probably necessary’ to achieve deep reductions in CO₂ emissions between now and 2050 in their own country. Only one in eight considered that CCS was ‘probably’ or ‘definitely not necessary’. For a range of 12 identified risks, 20–40% thought that they would be ‘moderate’ or ‘very serious’, whilst 60–80% thought that there would be no risks or that the risks would be ‘minimal’. A particular risk identified by nearly half the sample is the additional use of fossil fuels due to the ‘energy penalty’ incurred by CCS. Further concerns are that development of CCS would detract from investment in renewable energy technologies. Half of the respondents thought that incentives for CCS should be set either at the same level as those for renewables or at a higher level. Environmental NGOs were consistently less enthusiastic about CCS than the energy industry.     

The environmental impact of post-combustion CO2 capture with MEA, with aqueous ammonia, and with an aqueous ammonia-ethanol mixture for a coal-fired power plant

In this paper the authors compare monoethanolamine (MEA) to aqueous ammonia (AA) and a solvent mixture of aqueous ammonia and ethanol (EAA) with respect to their post-combustion CO₂ capture performance and their environmental impact. Simulation of all processes was carried out with Aspen Plus^® and compared to experimental results for CO₂ scrubbing with ammonia. Of special interest was the formation of stable salts, which could be observed in the experimental CO₂ capture with both ammonia solvents. If CO₂ can be captured in the form of ammonium salts, energy requirements are greatly reduced, since no energy is required for solvent regeneration and CO₂ compression. The environmental impact of CO₂ capture was investigated for a 500 MW pulverised coal power plant employing Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) using the software SimaPro^®. For a comprehensive evaluation of this impact, influencing factors such as solvent production and solvent emissions were included. With kinetics taken into account, no salt formation could be observed in CO₂ removal with aqueous ammonia. The necessary reduction of ammonia emissions leads to further energy requirements, and solvent production as well as the remaining ammonia losses to the environment have a more significant environmental impact than CO₂ removal with MEA.     

Economic implications of pre- and post-combustion calcium looping configurations applied to gasification power plants

Gasification is a promising conversion technology to deliver high energy efficiency simultaneously with low energy and cost penalties for carbon capture. This paper is devoted to in-depth economic evaluations of pre- and post-combustion Calcium Looping (CaL) configurations for Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plants. The poly-generation capability, e.g. hydrogen and power co-generation, is also discussed. The post-combustion CaL option is a gasification power plant in which the flue gases from the gas turbine are treated for CO₂ capture in a carbonation–calcination cycle. In pre-combustion CaL option, the Sorbent Enhanced Water Gas Shift (SEWGS) feature is used to produce hydrogen which is used for power generation. As benchmark case, a conventional gasification power plant without carbon capture was considered. Net power output of evaluated cases is in the range of 550–600 MW with more than 95% carbon capture rate. The pre-combustion capture configuration was evaluated also in hydrogen and power co-generation scenario. The evaluations are concentrated for estimation of capital costs, specific investment cost, operational & maintenance (O&M) costs, CO₂ removal and avoidance costs, electricity costs, sensitivity analysis of technical and economic assumptions on key economic indicators etc.     

A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage. Part A: Review and selection of promising conversion and capture technologies

We performed a consistent comparison of state-of-the-art and advanced electricity and hydrogen production technologies with CO₂ capture using coal and natural gas, inspired by the large number of studies, of which the results can in fact not be compared due to specific assumptions made. After literature review, a standardisation and selection exercise has been performed to get figures on conversion efficiency, energy production costs and CO₂ avoidance costs of different technologies, the main parameters for comparison. On the short term, electricity can be produced with 85–90% CO₂ capture by means of NGCC and PC with chemical absorption and IGCC with physical absorption at 4.7–6.9 €ct/kWh, assuming a coal and natural gas price of 1.7 and 4.7 €/GJ. CO₂ avoidance costs are between 15 and 50 €/t CO₂ for IGCC and NGCC, respectively. On the longer term, both improvements in existing conversion and capture technologies are foreseen as well as new power cycles integrating advanced turbines, fuel cells and novel (high-temperature) separation technologies. Electricity production costs might be reduced to 4.5–5.3 €ct/kWh with advanced technologies. However, no clear ranking can be made due to large uncertainties pertaining to investment and O&M costs. Hydrogen production is more attractive for low-cost CO₂ capture than electricity production. Costs of large-scale hydrogen production by means of steam methane reforming and coal gasification with CO₂ capture from the shifted syngas are estimated at 9.5 and 7 €/GJ, respectively. Advanced autothermal reforming and coal gasification deploying ion transport membranes might further reduce production costs to 8.1 and 6.4 €/GJ. Membrane reformers enable small-scale hydrogen production at nearly 17 €/GJ with relatively low-cost CO₂ capture.     

CO2 emissions and carbon capture and storage prospects in the electric power industry of Guangdong Province,China

The main objective of this study is to characterise the electric power industry's CO₂ emissions and to understand its carbon capture and storage (CCS) prospects in China's Guangdong Province. Coal-fired power plants in Guangdong are the major point sources, contributing to more than 90% of CO₂ emissions of the electric power industry. The fossil-fuelled power plants are mainly located in the Pearl River Delta (PRD), and the newly built and planned large plants are mainly located in coastal zones. More basic research and investigation are necessary in the coming years to develop CCS. In the medium term, the harbours of eastern cities can be the key areas for CCS demonstration projects. In the long term, the reduction effect can be more remarkable if the CO₂ capture and pipeline project could be constructed on a large scale within the densest CO₂ point source area in the PRD.     

Electricity consumption and CO2 capture potential in Spain

In this paper, different electricity demand scenarios for Spain are presented. Population, income per capita, energy intensity and the contribution of electricity to the total energy demand have been taken into account in the calculations. Technological role of different generation technologies, i.e. coal, nuclear, renewable, combined cycle (CC), combined heat and power (CHP) and carbon capture and storage (CCS), are examined in the form of scenarios up to 2050. Nine future scenarios corresponding to three electrical demands and three options for new capacity: minimum cost of electricity, minimum CO₂ emissions and a criterion with a compromise between CO₂ and cost (CO₂-cost criterion) have been proposed. Calculations show reduction in CO₂ emissions from 2020 to 2030, reaching a maximum CO₂ emission reduction of 90% in 2050 in an efficiency scenario with CCS and renewables. The contribution of CCS from 2030 is important with percentage values of electricity production around 22–28% in 2050. The cost of electricity (COE) increases up to 25% in 2030, and then this value remains approximately constant or decreases slightly.     

CO2 capture using carbide slag modified by propionic acid in calcium looping process for hydrogen production

Lime enhanced gasification (LEGS) process based on calcium looping in which CaO is employed as CO₂ sorbent is an emerging technology for hydrogen production and CO₂ capture. In this work, carbide slag which was an industrial solid waste was utilized as CO₂ sorbent in hydrogen production process. Modification of carbide slag by propionic acid was proposed to improve its reactivity. The CO₂ capture behavior of raw and modified carbide slags was investigated in a dual fixed-bed reactor (DFR) and a thermo-gravimetric analyzer (TGA). The results show that modification of carbide slag by propionic acid enhances its CO₂ capture capacity in the multiple calcination/carbonation cycles. The favorable carbonation temperature and calcination temperature for modified carbide slag are 680–700 °C and 850–950 °C, respectively. Prolonged carbonation treatment is beneficial to CO₂ capture of raw and modified carbide slags. The prolonged carbonation for 9 h in the 21st cycle increases the conversions of raw and modified carbide slags in this cycle. And then the carbonation conversions of the two sorbents were also improved in the subsequent cycles. Calcined modified carbide slag shows more porous microstructure compared with calcined raw one for the same number of cycles. Modification of carbide slag by propionic acid increases the surface area, pore volume and pore area. In addition, the volume and area of the pores in 20–100 nm in diameter were improved, which had been proved to be more effective to capture CO₂. The microstructure of calcined modified carbide slag favors its higher CO₂ capture capacity in the multiple calcination/carbonation cycles.     

Cost of energy and environmental policy in Portuguese CO2 abatement—scenario analysis to 2020

This paper quantifies the contribution of Portuguese energy policies for total and marginal abatement costs (MAC) for CO₂ emissions for 2020. The TIMES_PT optimisation model was used to derive MAC curves from a set of policy scenarios including one or more of the following policies: ban on nuclear power; ban on new coal power plants without carbon sequestration and storage; incentives to natural gas power plants; and a cap on biomass use. The different MAC shows the policies’ effects in the potential for CO₂ abatement. In 2020, in the most encompassing policy scenario, with all current and planned policies, is possible to abate only up to +35% of 1990 emissions at a cost below 23 € t/CO₂. In the more flexible policy scenarios, it is possible to abate up to −10% of 1990 emissions below the same cost. The total energy system costs are 10–13% higher if all policies are implemented—76 to 101 B€—roughly the equivalent to 2.01–2.65% of the 2005 GDP. Thus, from a CO₂ emission mitigation perspective, the existing policies introduce significant inefficiencies, possibly related to other policy goals. The ban on nuclear power is the instrument that has the most significant effect in MAC.     

Carbon capture: Energy wasting technologies or the MCFCs challenge?

Carbon dioxide is more and more pointed out as one of the factors mostly responsible of climate changes. As a consequence the reduction of CO₂ emissions, especially in the energy generation field, is becoming a worldwide must.This paper presents an overview on the main issues that are expected to affect, from this standpoint, power generation scenario and a spur for a critical comparison among ways to capture CO₂ by proposing new aspects to be considered within the evaluation criteria.In particular attention is drawn on the fully innovative opportunities that are offered by Molten Carbonate Fuel Cells (MCFCs) as a unique option suitable to effectively combine carbon capture from thermal plants and typical benefits of hydrogen and fuel cell power generation.As an example, such a new option is compared with one of the most common technologies forecast for reducing carbon dioxide emissions and relevant results are shortly presented.     

Optimised integration of post-combustion CO2 capture process in greenfield power plants

Newly built (greenfield) power plant offer the advantage of optimised integration measures to reduce the efficiency penalty associated with the application of a post-combustion CO₂ capture process by wet chemical absorption. Especially, the integration of waste heat from the desorber overhead condenser of the CO₂ capture unit (CCU) and from the CO₂ compressor into the water-steam-cycle of the power plant offers optimisation potential.     

Sulphur impacts during pulverised coal combustion in oxy-fuel technology for carbon capture and storage

The oxy-fuel process is one of three carbon capture technologies which supply CO₂ ready for sequestration - the others being post-combustion capture and IGCC with carbon capture. As yet no technology has emerged as a clear winner in the race to commercial deployment. The oxy-fuel process relies on recycled flue gas as the main heat carrier through the boiler and results in significantly different flue gas compositions. Sulphur has been shown in the study to have impacts in the furnace, during ash collection, CO₂ compression and transport as well as storage, with many options for its removal or impact control. In particular, the effect of sulphur containing species can pose a risk for corrosion throughout the plant and transport pipelines. This paper presents a technical review of all laboratory and pilot work to identify impacts of sulphur impurities from throughout the oxy-fuel process, from combustion, gas cleaning, compression to sequestration with removal and remedial options. An economic assessment of the optimum removal is not considered. Recent oxy-fuel pilot trials performed in support of the Callide Oxy-fuel Project and other pilot scale data are interpreted and combined with thermodynamic simulations to develop a greater fundamental understanding of the changes incurred by recycling the flue gas. The simulations include a sensitivity analysis of process variables and comparisons between air fired and oxy-fuel fired conditions - such as combustion products, SO₃ conversion and limestone addition.     

Recent developments in membrane-based technologies for CO2 capture

Developing new methods and technologies that compete with conventional industrial processes for CO₂ capture and recovery is a hot topic in the current research. Conventional processes do not fit with the current approach of process intensification but take advantage due to their maturity and large-scale implementation. Acting in a precombusion scenario or post-combustion scenario involves the separation of CO₂/H₂ or CO₂/N₂, respectively.     

Capturing CO2 in flue gas from fossil fuel-fired power plants using dry regenerable alkali metal-based sorbent

CO₂ capture and storage (CCS) has received significant attention recently and is recognized as an important option for reducing CO₂ emissions from fossil fuel combustion. A particularly promising option involves the use of dry alkali metal-based sorbents to capture CO₂ from flue gas. Here, alkali metal carbonates are used to capture CO₂ in the presence of H₂O to form either sodium or potassium bicarbonate at temperatures below 100 °C. A moderate temperature swing of 120–200 °C then causes the bicarbonate to decompose and release a mixture of CO₂/H₂O that can be converted into a “sequestration-ready” CO₂ stream by condensing the steam. This process can be readily used for retrofitting existing facilities and easily integrated with new power generation facilities. It is ideally suited for coal-fired power plants incorporating wet flue gas desulfurization, due to the associated cooling and saturation of the flue gas. It is expected to be both cost effective and energy efficient.     

CO2 capture efficiency and energy requirement analysis of power plant using modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle

This paper examines the average carbonation conversion, CO₂ capture efficiency and energy requirement for post-combustion CO₂ capture system during the modified calcium-based sorbent looping cycle. The limestone modified with acetic acid solution, i.e. calcium acetate is taken as an example of the modified calcium-based sorbents. The modified limestone exhibits much higher average carbonation conversion than the natural sorbent under the same condition. The CO₂ capture efficiency increases with the sorbent flow ratios. Compared with the natural limestone, much less makeup mass flow of the recycled and the fresh sorbent is needed for the system when using the modified limestone at the same CO₂ capture efficiency. Achieving 0.95 of CO₂ capture efficiency without sulfation, 272 kJ/mol CO₂ is required in the calciner for the natural limestone, whereas only 223 kJ/mol CO₂ for the modified sorbent. The modified limestone possesses greater advantages in CO₂ capture efficiency and energy consumption than the natural sorbent. When the sulfation and carbonation of the sorbents take place simultaneously, more energy is required. It is significantly necessary to remove SO₂ from the flue gas before it enters the carbonator in order to reduce energy consumption in the calciner.     

Comparative assessment of CO2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes

This article presents a consistent techno-economic assessment and comparison of CO₂ capture technologies for key industrial sectors (iron and steel, cement, petroleum refineries and petrochemicals). The assessment is based on an extensive literature review, covering studies from both industries and academia. Key parameters, e.g., capacity factor (91-97%), energy prices (natural gas: 8 €₂₀₀₇/GJ, coal: 2.5 €₂₀₀₇/GJ, grid electricity: 55 €/MWh), interest rate (10%), economic plant lifetime (20 years), CO₂ compression pressure (110 bar), and grid electricity CO₂ intensity (400 g/kWh), were standardized to enable a fair comparison of technologies. The analysis focuses on the changes in energy, CO₂ emissions and material flows, due to the deployment of CO₂ capture technologies. CO₂ capture technologies are categorized into short-mid term (ST/MT) and long term (LT) technologies. The findings of this study identified a large number of technologies under development, but it is too soon to identify which technologies would become dominant in the future. Moreover, a good integration of industrial plants and power plants is essential for cost-effective CO₂ capture because CO₂ capture may increase the industrial onsite electricity production significantly.For the iron and steel sector, 40-65 €/tCO₂ avoided may be achieved in the ST/MT, depending on the ironmaking process and the CO₂ capture technique. Advanced LT CO₂ capture technologies for the blast furnace based process may not offer significant advantages over conventional ones (30-55 €/tCO₂ avoided). Rather than the performance of CO₂ capture technique itself, low-cost CO₂ emissions reduction comes from good integration of CO₂ capture to the ironmaking process. Advanced smelting reduction with integrated CO₂ capture may enable lower steel production cost and lower CO₂ emissions than the blast furnace based process, i.e., negative CO₂ mitigation cost. For the cement sector, post-combustion capture appears to be the only commercial technology in the ST/MT and the costs are above 65 €/tCO₂ avoided. In the LT, a number of technologies may enable 25-55 €/tCO₂ avoided. The findings also indicate that, in some cases, partial CO₂ capture may have comparative advantages. For the refining and petrochemical sectors, oxyfuel capture was found to be more economical than others at 50-60 €/tCO₂ avoided in ST/MT and about 30 €/tCO₂ avoided in the LT. However, oxyfuel retrofit of furnaces and heaters may be more complicated than that of boilers.Crude estimates of technical potentials for global CO₂ emissions reduction for 2030 were made for the industrial processes investigated with the ST/MT technologies. They amount up to about 4 Gt/yr: 1 Gt/yr for the iron and steel sector, about 2 Gt/yr for the cement sector, and 1 Gt/yr for petroleum refineries. The actual deployment level would be much lower due to various constraints, about 0.8 Gt/yr, in a stringent emissions reduction scenario.