Double-blind comparison of bupropion sustained release and sertraline in depressed outpatients

BACKGROUND: A sustained-release formulation of bupropion (bupropion SR), developed with an improved pharmacokinetic profile to permit less frequent dosing than the immediate-release form, has not been evaluated in active comparator trials. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of bupropion SR and sertraline. METHOD: Outpatients with moderate to severe major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) received bupropion SR (100-300 mg/day) or sertraline (50-200 mg/day) for 16 weeks. Psychiatric evaluations, including the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), the Clinical Global Impressions scale for Severity of Illness (CGI-S), and for Improvement (CGI-I) were completed, and adverse events were assessed in the clinic periodically throughout treatment. Patients' orgasm function was also assessed. RESULTS: Mean HAM-D, HAM-A, CGI-I, and CGI-S scores improved over the course of treatment in both the bupropion SR group and the sertraline group; no between-group differences were observed on any of the scales. Orgasm dysfunction was significantly (p < .001) more common in sertraline-treated patients compared with bupropion SR-treated patients. The adverse events of nausea, diarrhea, somnolence, and sweating were also experienced more frequently (p < .05) in sertraline-treated patients. No differences were noted between the two treatments for vital signs and weight. CONCLUSION: This double-blind comparison of bupropion SR and sertraline demonstrates that bupropion and sertraline are similarly effective for the treatment of depression. Both compounds were relatively well tolerated, and orgasm dysfunction, nausea, diarrhea, somnolence, and sweating were reported more frequently in sertraline-treated patients.     

Initial and repeat screening for Chlamydia trachomatis during pregnancy

BACKGROUND: We examined the efficacy and safety of three different dosages of venlafaxine hydrochloride (75, 225, and 375 mg/day) in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-group study. METHOD: Outpatients, 18 to 65 years old, who met DSM-III criteria for major depression were included (N = 358 randomized; 194 completed). Of the total patients completing the trial, 59%, 56%, 51%, and 51% were in the placebo, 75-mg, 225-mg, and 375-mg groups, respectively. The primary outcome measures were the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D21) total, HAM-D21 depression item, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale total, and Clinical Global Impressions scale. RESULTS: Each dosage of venlafaxine was associated with statistically significant improvement as compared with placebo, based on the intent-to-treat sample. The two higher dosages were associated with a modestly greater antidepressant response than was the 75-mg dosage. Nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and anorexia were the most common adverse events attributable to venlafaxine. Since headache occurred at a similar frequency in both the drug and placebo groups, we did not consider it to be attributable to venlafaxine use. Withdrawal from the study due to adverse events occurred in 5%, 17%, 24%, and 30% of the patients in the placebo, 75-mg, 225-mg, and 375-mg groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine, at dosages of 75-375 mg/day, is an effective and well-tolerated antidepressant. With increasing dosage, greater efficacy and possibly more adverse effects will occur.     

Possible involvement of free radicals in lipopolysaccharide-induced labyrinthitis in the guinea pig: a morphological and functional investigation

BACKGROUND: There are few published placebo-controlled clinical trials demonstrating the efficacy of the newer antidepressants in markedly or severely depressed hospitalized patients. This study demonstrates the efficacy of nefazodone compared with placebo in the treatment of patients hospitalized for major depression. METHOD: Nefazodone and placebo treatment were compared in a 6-week trial of 120 patients hospitalized for DSM-III-R diagnosed major depression (without psychosis) at 2 study centers. Efficacy was evaluated using standard psychiatric rating scales, and patients were monitored for safety. RESULTS: Nefazodone treatment resulted in a significant reduction (p < .01) of the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score compared with placebo from the end of the first treatment week through the end of the study (-12.2 nefazodone vs. -7.7 placebo). At the end of the trial, significantly more nefazodone-treated patients (50%) than placebo-treated patients (29%) had responded, as indicated by their Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement score (p = .021) or by a > or = 50% reduction in their HAM-D-17 scores (p = .017). Significantly more patients treated with nefazodone (36%) than placebo-treated patients (14%) had a HAM-D-17 score < or = 10 at the end of treatment (p = .004). Significant treatment differences (p < .01) in favor of nefazodone were also seen in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; the HAM-D retardation, anxiety, and sleep disturbance factors; and HAM-D item 1 (depressed mood). Patients with dysthymia in addition to major depression also showed significant improvement (p < .05) when treated with nefazodone, with significant differences in response rates seen as early as week 2 and through the end of the trial. The mean nefazodone dose was 491 mg/day at the end of week 2 and 503 mg/day at the end of treatment. Nefazodone was well tolerated, and the number of patients discontinuing owing to adverse events was small, with no significant safety issues noted in either treatment group. Fewer nefazodone-treated than placebo-treated patients discontinued owing to lack of efficacy. CONCLUSION: Nefazodone was superior to placebo in the treatment of marked to severe major depression in patients requiring hospitalization. The clinical benefit of nefazodone was evident as early as the first week of treatment as judged by several measures of efficacy, with significant differences from placebo sustained throughout the trial.     

Personality disorder comorbidity with major depression and response to treatment with sertraline or citalopram

The purpose of this study was to investigate the frequency of DSM-III-R personality disorders in depressed patients treated in primary care, and to examine the effect of sertraline or citalopram on the diagnosis of personality disorders. A total of 308 patients with a major depressive disorder were assessed with the Swedish version of the Structured Clinical Interview for Personality Disorders (SCID) screen questionnaire, before and after 24 weeks double-blind treatment with sertraline (50-150 mg/day) or citalopram (20-60 mg/day). Following treatment, significant reductions in the frequency of paranoid, borderline, avoidant and dependent personality disorder diagnoses were seen in both treatment groups. When the personality disorders were analysed as continuous, dimensional personality traits significant reductions were seen for most personality categories. To elucidate if the observed reductions in personality disorder criteria could be explained by the improvement in depressive symptomatology, a series of multiple regressions were made. Reduction of depression scores was of some importance for the changes in most personality disorders. However, the multiple R never exceeded 0.24 (cluster C). Type of drug was of importance only as concerns obsessive-compulsive personality disorder. Overall, the results suggest that sertraline and citalopram may be beneficial in the treatment of certain personality disorder traits in patients with major depressive disorders.     

Do patients with chronic pain selectively attend to pain-related information?: preliminary evidence for the mediating role of fear

To date, there appears to be no consensus of opinion as to whether the adrenal glands are hyperresponsive during depression and, if so, whether this a state-dependent phenomenon. We aimed to determine the effects of antidepressant treatment on ACTH-induced cortisol responses in patients with melancholic depression. Seven female patients with DSM-III-R major depressive disorder, non-psychotic, melancholic subtype, were evaluated using the following rating scales: the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and the Newcastle Endogenicity Scale. All subjects were then given an intravenous bolus dose (250 micrograms) of tetracosactrin, a potent stimulus of adrenocortical hormone secretion. Plasma levels of cortisol were measured at times 0, + 30, + 60, + 90, + 120 and + 180 min. Patients were then randomised to receive either 50 mg of sertraline or 20 mg of paroxetine (both of which are selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors) and were re-tested while medication-free. Treatment resulted in a significant decrease in delta (the difference between the baseline values and the maximum increase post-ACTH administration) cortisol values of 1633.3 +/- 378.5 nmol/l vs. 595.1 +/- 207.7 nmol/l. Successful pharmacological treatment of major depressive disorder appears to be associated with a reduction in ACTH-induced cortisol release in drug-free patients.     

Triacetyluridine (TAU) decreases depressive symptoms and increases brain pH in bipolar patients.

Eleven patients with bipolar depression were given doses of up to 18 g per day of triacetyluridine (TAU) over 6 weeks to test the effect of uridine on symptoms of depression via Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS; Asberg, Montgomery, Perris, Schalling, & Sedvall, 1978) scores and on cellular bioenergetics using phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (31P-MRSI). All patients and comparison participants (n = 9) completed baseline 31P-MRSI scans, and 9 patients completed posttherapy scans. The percentage changes for MADRS scores (Week 2, -23.8; Week 3, -34.9; Week 4, -42.5) and the time effects of TAU on MADRS scores (Week 2, z = -2.07, p = .039; Week 3, z = -4.28, p     

A controlled, prospective, 1-year trial of citalopram in the treatment of panic disorder

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of citalopram in the long-term treatment of adult outpatients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. METHOD: Patients in this double-blind, parallel-group trial were assigned to 1 of 3 fixed dosage ranges of citalopram (10 or 15 mg/day, 20 or 30 mg/day, or 40 or 60 mg/day), 1 dosage range of clomipramine (60 or 90 mg/day), or placebo. After the completed 8-week acute treatment period, the eligible patients could continue the treatment for up to 1 year. Of the 475 patients who were randomly assigned for the short-term trial, 279 agreed to continue double-blind treatment at their assigned doses. The primary efficacy measure used was the Clinical Anxiety Scale panic attack item, and the response was defined as no panic attacks (score of 0 or 1). The other key measures used were the Physician's Global Improvement Scale, the Patient's Global Improvement Scale, and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A). RESULTS: In all drug-treated groups, except the group receiving the lowest citalopram dose, the treatment outcome was generally better than with placebo. As determined by a life table analysis of response, the probability of response during the 12 months was significantly greater with all treatment regimens than with placebo (p < .05), with citalopram 20 or 30 mg/day demonstrating the best response. Panic attacks tended to disappear in all patients remaining in the study until the end of follow-up. Analysis of the difference in the number of patients in different treatment groups remaining in the study (perhaps the best measure of long-term efficacy) also demonstrated that the patients treated with citalopram in dosage ranges of 20 or 30 mg/day and 40 or 60 mg/day had better response than placebo-treated patients (p < .0002 and p < .004, respectively). HAM-A and Global Improvement Scale scores also showed that patients treated with active drug showed greater improvement than placebo-treated patients. All treatment groups showed no new or exceptional adverse event clusters. CONCLUSION: Citalopram in the dosage range of 20 to 60 mg/day is effective, well tolerated, and safe in the long-term treatment of patients who have panic disorder.     

The prevalence of verbal communication disability in patients with Parkinson''s disease

BACKGROUND: We evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of sertraline and fluvoxamine in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study during a follow-up of 24 months. METHOD: Sixty-four patients with recurrent, unipolar depression (DSM-IV criteria) who had at least one depressive episode during the 18 months preceding the index episode were accepted into the trial. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two long-term treatment groups and evaluated monthly by trained psychiatrists, blinded to treatment option, on the basis of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. RESULTS: All patients completed the 24-month follow-up period. Sertraline and fluvoxamine showed an equal efficacy in preventing new recurrences. In fact, there was no significant difference in survival rates between the two medication groups: 7 sertraline-treated patients (21.9%) and 6 fluvoxamine-treated patients (18.7%) had a single new recurrence (z = 0.14; p = .88). Moreover, recurrence observed during maintenance therapies was less severe and/or of shorter duration than index episodes. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with sertraline or fluvoxamine has been shown to be effective for prevention of highly recurrent unipolar depression. The high tolerability of these compounds, together with their prophylactic effectiveness, has an important role in improving the quality of life of these patients.     

An open study of sertraline in acute and continuation treatment of depressed out-patients

The efficacy and tolerability of sertraline in 422 out-patients with major depression (DSM-III-R) was evaluated in an open multicentre 8-month study. Patients received sertraline 50 mg/day; if there was insufficient response at week 4, the dose was increased to 100 mg/day. After 8 weeks, 68.6% of patients had responded (> or = 50% reduction in Montgomery Asberg depression rating scale and clinical global impression scale scores of two or less (improvement of illness) and three or less (severity of illness); of patients receiving continuation treatment, 87.9% maintained at least a partial response at the final visit. The clinical response to the 50 mg/day dose was maintained throughout the acute treatment in 64% of patients. In all, 23% of the patients had mild or moderate drug-related gastrointestinal disturbances, which generally disappeared after 2 weeks. Only 8% of the patients withdrew because of side-effects. Just over half of the patients were taking other psychotropic drugs. Nevertheless the results of this open study are consistent with those of controlled studies in which sertraline was effective and well tolerated, in acute and continuation treatment for major depression, at 50 mg/day in most patients.     

Sociocultural influences and care of dying children in Japan and the United States

Depression is a common cause of sexual dysfunction, but also antidepressant medication is often associated with sexual side effects. This article includes two related studies. The first double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation and aimed to assess putative differences between the major selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) with regard to their ejaculation-delaying effect. Sixty men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) of 1 minute or less were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine 20 mg/day, fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, paroxetine 20 mg/day, sertraline 50 mg/day, or placebo for 6 weeks. During the 1-month baseline and 6-week treatment periods, the men measured their IELT at home using a stopwatch. The trial was completed by 51 men. During the 6-week treatment period, the geometric mean IELT in the placebo group was constant at approximately 20 seconds. Analysis of variance revealed a between-groups difference in the evolution of IELT delay (p = 0.0004); in the paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups there was a gradual increase to about 110 seconds, whereas in the fluvoxamine group, IELT was increased to only approximately 40 seconds. The paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups differed significantly (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.017, respectively) from placebo but the fluvoxamine group did not (p = 0.38). Compared with baseline, paroxetine exerted the strongest delay in ejaculation, followed by fluoxetine and sertraline. There was no clinically relevant delay in ejaculation with fluvoxamine. In men with lifelong rapid ejaculation, paroxetine delayed ejaculation most strongly, whereas fluvoxamine delayed ejaculation the least. The second double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation (IELT < or = 1 minute) and in men with lifelong less-rapid ejaculation (IELT > 1 minute) to investigate whether data about SSRI-induced delayed ejaculation in men with rapid ejaculation may be extrapolated to men with less-rapid ejaculation. After measurement of IELT at home (using a stopwatch) during a 1-month baseline assessment, 32 men with an IELT of 1 minute or less (group 1) or more than 1 minute (group 2) were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks in a double-blind manner. Patients continued to measure their IELTs at home during the 6 weeks of the study. At baseline, 24 patients consistently had IELTs of one minute or less (group 1), and eight patients had IELTs of more than 1 minute (group 2). The geometric mean IELT was 14 seconds in group 1 and 83 seconds in group 2. Twelve patients in group 1 and five in group 2 were randomized to the paroxetine 20 mg/day. The percentage increase in the geometric mean IELT compared with baseline in patients treated with paroxetine was 420% (95% confidence interval [CI], 216-758%) in group 1 and 480% (95% CI, 177-1,118%) in group 2 (p = 0.81). After 6 weeks of treatment with paroxetine, the geometric mean IELT was 92 seconds in group 1 and 602 seconds in group 2 (p < 0.001). Therefore, the paroxetine-induced percentage increase in IELT seems to be independent of the baseline IELT. This suggests that ejaculation-delaying side effects of some SSRIs investigated in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation may be generalized to men with less-rapid ejaculation.     

Major depressive subtypes and treatment response

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between depressive subtypes and response to fluoxetine treatment in a large cohort of outpatients. We studied 294 outpatients with major depressive disorder who were then treated with fluoxetine 20 mg/day for 8 weeks. Treatment outcome was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS)-17, the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity, and with the HDRS-8; the latter is proposed to be a relatively more specific measure of depression severity than the HDRS-17. We assessed the relationships between degree of treatment response and several depressive subtypes (melancholic, atypical, hostile, and anxious depression, double depression, and depression with comorbid personality disorders), after adjusting for baseline depression severity. We found that nonanxious depressives (patients without any comorbid anxiety disorder) improved slightly but significantly more during treatment than anxious depressives on all outcome measures. Melancholic depression was associated with slightly less improvement on the HDRS-17 only, whereas the other subtypes of depression were not associated with differences in treatment outcome.     

The synthesis and in vitro characterization of the mucoadhesion and swelling of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels

Depression is a significant problem in epilepsy. Suicides occur in epileptic patients five times more often than in general population. Material included 34 epileptics with 76 suicidal attempts and 24 patients with no history of suicide. Psychical state was studied with Beck Depression Inventory and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. In the group with suicidal attempts 65% of patients had depression (54.5% of them had major depression) and in group without suicide attempts depression was noted in 54% (23% with major depression). Patients with depression were divided into two groups: group I with suicidal attempts and group II without history of suicide. In group I more patients were alcohol abusers (50% vs 31%), more were treated because of epilepsy longer than 10 years (59% vs 46%) and more had tonic-clonic seizures (82% vs 46%). In group I, 54% of patients were on polytherapy (more than half of them with fenobarbital). In group II, 31% of epileptics were on polytherapy (no one with fenobarbital). Major depression was significantly more frequent in epileptics with suicidal attempts. The severity of depression may influence the risk of suicide. Major depression may be associated with late age of onset of epilepsy, longer treatment duration, tonic-clonic seizures, polytherapy (mainly with fenobarbital) and alcohol abuse.     

Differential effects of migraine drugs on cerebral blood flow autoregulation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in depressed inpatients and outpatients. METHOD: Patients with a major depressive episode (DSM-III-R), a baseline score of > or=21 on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), and > or=2 on HAM-D Item 1 (depressed mood) were randomly assigned to a 6-week treatment with either mirtazapine (N=66, 15-60 mg/day) or fluoxetine (N=67, 20-40 mg/day). The upper limit of the mirtazapine dose range was above the dose range approved in the United States (15-45 mg/day). Efficacy was evaluated by the HAM-D, Clinical Global Impressions, the Visual Analogue Mood Rating Scale (VAMRS), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (QLESQ). The efficacy analyses were performed on the intent-to-treat group using the last-observation-carried-forward method. RESULTS: Mean total 17-item HAM-D scores at baseline were 26.0 for the mirtazapine- and 26.1 for the fluoxetine-treated group. The decrease from baseline on the HAM-D was larger in the mirtazapine than in the fluoxetine group throughout the treatment period, reaching statistical significance at days 21 and 28. At assessments from day 21 and onward, the absolute difference between the 2 study groups favoring mirtazapine ranged from 3.7 to 4.2 points, the magnitude of difference usually seen between an efficacious antidepressant drug and placebo. Mean dosages at weeks 1-4 were 36.5 mg/day for mirtazapine and 19.6 mg/day for fluoxetine; the respective dosages at weeks 5-6 were 56.3 mg and 35.8 mg. Similar numbers of patients dropped out due to adverse events; tolerability profiles were comparable except for changes in body weight from baseline which were statistically significantly more pronounced in the mirtazapine group compared to the fluoxetine group. CONCLUSION: We found that mirtazapine was as well tolerated as fluoxetine and significantly more effective after 3 and 4 weeks of therapy.     

A 1 year double-blind placebo-controlled fixed dose study of sertraline in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy, over a 1 year treatment period, of three dose levels of sertraline and placebo in the treatment of non-depressed adult out-patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Following 1 week of single-blind placebo washout, patients (n = 325) from 11 sites following identical protocols were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with one of three fixed doses of sertraline (50, 100 or 200 mg) or placebo. At the end of 12 weeks, treatment responders (including placebo patients) were offered an additional 40 weeks of double-blind treatment at their assigned doses. Efficacy measures were the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, the NIMH Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness and Global Improvement and the Maudsley Obsessive Compulsive Inventory. Patients in the pooled sertraline group showed greater improvement than placebo-treated patients on all efficacy measures, based on the endpoint analyses. Moreover, pairwise comparisons at endpoint revealed a significant effect on all three investigator-rated scales in patients receiving 50 or 200 mg of sertraline; in the 100 mg group, there was a significant effect on the NIMH Global Obsessive Compulsive Scale only. Patients completing 3 months of sertraline treatment exhibited excellent toleration and sustained improvement during an additional 40 weeks of therapy. Results support the safety, efficacy and tolerability of daily doses of 50-200 mg of sertraline in the long-term treatment of patients with OCD.     

Excision of Ds1 from the genome of maize streak virus in response to different transposase-encoding genes

Reliability and validity of direct visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings of improvement were assessed in 162 patients with Seasonal Affective Disorder, Winter Depression type (W-SAD), after light treatment for 6 consecutive days. The patients were rated with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and a scale for the 'atypical' symptoms hypersomnia, hyperphagia and carbohydrate craving (the ATYP scale) before and after treatment. After treatment the patients also self-rated their global improvement on a 10-cm VAS, with anchoring points of 'No improvement' and 'Complete improvement'. VAS ratings were repeated several times, with 1-4 weeks between assessments, in a follow-up period, always referring to improvement in relation to baseline, and accompanied by a statement whether there had been any change since the former VAS rating. Shortly after treatment there was a mean reduction of 59.8% on the MADRS and 57.1% on the ATYP score, and 58.4% improvement as measured by the VAS. VAS rating correlated highly with percentage reduction of MADRS scores (r=0.85) and somewhat less with reduction of ATYP scores (r=0.64). VAS ratings in the follow-up period showed an extremely high test-retest reliability (r=0.96) for two consecutive ratings between which the patient stated that there had been no definite change. The results support the use of VAS ratings for assessment of global improvement after light treatment in patients suffering from W-SAD; use in other kinds of depression and with other types of treatment remains to be explored.     

Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on brown adipose tissue and energy balance in mice

BACKGROUND: Psychotropic drug dosing regimens are often based on the pharmacokinetic elimination half-life of the compound. This implies that the pharmacokinetic half-life of the drug may be the critical or sole determinant of pharmacodynamic half-life. In the present study, we examined the safety and efficacy of once- versus twice-daily dosing regimens of the immediate-release formulation of venlafaxine, a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake site blocker with a short elimination half-life. METHOD: Forty-eight patients with a diagnosis of DSM-IV major depressive episode were randomly assigned to once-daily (N = 25) versus twice-daily (N = 23) venlafaxine. Venlafaxine was started at 37.5 mg daily with specified increments up to 225 mg daily. Efficacy was rated using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Clinical Global Impressions scale (CGI). RESULTS: Twenty-one patients in each group completed 6 weeks of treatment. We observed a significant reduction in mean weekly HAM-D and MADRS scores at weeks 1 through 6 for both dosing groups (p < .001). There were no statistically significant differences in mean HAM-D or MADRS scores between dosing groups at any time point. There was, however, a nonsignificant trend for a more rapid reduction in the mean HAM-D score at week 2 (p < .06) and in the mean MADRS score at week 1 (p < .07) and week 2 (p < .09) in the b.i.d. dosing group. Similarly, there was a significant decrease in the CGI score at week 2 (p < .02) in the b.i.d. dosing group. The rate of adverse events was similar between treatment groups; the most common adverse events were transient nausea and headaches. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the immediate-release formulation of venlafaxine may be safe and effective in some patients when used in a once-daily dose regimen. Moreover, the present results suggest that the short elimination half-life of immediate-release venlafaxine should not be the sole determinant for multiple daily dosing and that antidepressant activity may be more profoundly influenced by a drug's pharmacodynamic half-life than by its pharmacokinetic half-life.     

Enhancement of morphine antinociception by ibogaine and noribogaine in morphine-tolerant mice

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated and compared the efficacy of 20 mg versus 40 mg of paroxetine in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study during a maintenance period of 28 months. METHOD: Ninety-nine inpatients with recurrent, unipolar depression (DSM-IV criteria) who had at least 1 depressive episode during the 18 months preceding the index episode were openly treated with paroxetine 40 mg/day. Seventy-two subjects had a stable response (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score < 8) to paroxetine treatment and remained in the continuation treatment as outpatients for 4 months. At the time of recovery, 68 patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 maintenance treatment groups: paroxetine 20 mg or paroxetine 40 mg daily. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients completed the 28-month follow-up period. Seventeen (51.5%) of 33 patients in the 20-mg paroxetine regimen had a single recurrence compared with 8 (23.5%) of 34 subjects in the 40-mg dose regimen (chi2 = 5.56, p = .018). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a full dose of paroxetine is recommended in unipolar patients who are at high risk for recurrent depressive episodes.     

Moclobemide and imipramine in chronic depression (dysthymia): an international double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. International Collaborative Study Group

An international, multicenter, placebo-controlled study was undertaken to determine the safety and antidepressant efficacy of moclobemide, a new reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A, and imipramine in the treatment of dysthymia (DSM-III-R). A total of 315 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to an 8-week treatment in one of three groups (moclobemide, imipramine and placebo). Patients were male or female outpatients aged between 18 and 65 years meeting DSM-III-R criteria for dysthymia, primary type, with late or early onset. Of the patients in each group 85% completed the 8-week treatment period. The percentage of patients who no longer fulfilled DSM-III-R symptom criteria at treatment endpoint was significantly higher in the moclobemide (60%) and imipramine (49%) treatment groups than in the placebo group (22%). Differences to placebo were also statistically significant both for moclobemide and for imipramine on the other efficacy variables (i.e. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, final overall efficacy assessment, Clinical Global Impression and symptom check list self-rating). A significant superiority of moclobemide and imipramine over placebo was found in pure dysthymia and in double-depression, as well as in early and late onset subgroups. In early onset cases, moclobemide was significantly more effective than was imipramine on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Anticholinergic symptoms and sleepiness were significantly more frequent side effects on imipramine than on moclobemide or on placebo, and the investigators' final overall assessment of tolerability significantly favoured moclobemide over imipramine. This study demonstrates the efficacy of high dose moclobemide (mean dose 675 mg/day) and high dose imipramine (220 mg/day) against placebo in the treatment of dysthymia. Moclobemide was better tolerated than was imipramine.     

Destructive arthropathy in fibroblastic rheumatism: comment on the article by Romas et al

This pilot study involved six men with major depression treated with nefazodone dosed either twice/day or once/day at bedtime. Depression was rated before nefazodone therapy and at 4 weeks by the self-report version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. A simple 10-cm visual analog side effect scale for daytime drowsiness was completed at the latter time. Dosages of nefazodone were at least 400 mg/day. The results suggest that nefazodone given once/day at bedtime may be as effective as the currently accepted twice/day regimen, with less daytime drowsiness.     

A multicenter evaluation of the efficacy and safety of 150 and 300 mg/d sustained-release bupropion tablets versus placebo in depressed outpatients

This multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study compared the antidepressant efficacy and safety of bupropion sustained-release (SR) tablets (150 mg QD or 150 mg BID) with placebo in outpatients with moderate-to-severe depression. The study consisted of a 1-week placebo phase followed by 8 weeks of active treatment with bupropion SR 150 mg/d (150 mg QD, n = 121) or 300 mg/d (150 mg BID, n = 120) or placebo (n = 121). Efficacy was measured by changes in scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) and the Clinical Global Impressions for Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions for Improvement of Illness (CGI-I) scales. Safety was monitored by regular assessment of vital signs and adverse events as well as by pretreatment and posttreatment physical and clinical laboratory examinations. By day 56, both bupropion SR treatments were more effective in relieving the symptoms of depression than was placebo. Compared with those receiving placebo, patients in the bupropion SR 150- and 300-mg/d groups had significantly reduced symptoms by treatment day 56, as measured on the 17-item HAM-D, CGI-S, and CGI-I scales (P < 0.05). Bupropion SR was well tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported by bupropion-treated patients; 95% of all reported adverse events were of mild or moderate intensity. No clinically significant changes in vital signs, laboratory test results, or physical findings were observed. A greater mean weight loss was observed at the end of treatment in both the bupropion SR 150-mg (0.5 kg) and bupropion SR 300-mg (1.0 kg) group compared with placebo (0.2 kg). We found that bupropion SR 150 mg administered either once or twice daily was more effective than placebo in treating depression and that once-daily dosing appears to be at least as effective as twice-daily dosing. Should this prove true, depressed patients may be able to benefit from the convenience and improved tolerability associated with once-daily dosing.