Acute and chronic effects of ramelteon in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta): Dependence liability studies.

The acute and chronic effects of ramelteon, an MT?/MT? receptor agonist, were evaluated in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to assess discriminative stimulus effects in comparison with traditional benzodiazepine receptor agonists and to assess physical dependence potential. Discriminative effects of ramelteon were compared with midazolam in untreated monkeys and in diazepam-dependent monkeys that discriminated flumazenil. Dependence potential of ramelteon after daily 1-year administration (and intermittent discontinuation) was evaluated with standard operant procedures. Ramelteon did not produce benzodiazepine-like discriminative stimulus effects at doses up to 10 mg/kg. Long-term treatment or its discontinuation had no significant effect on spontaneous behavior, operant behavior, body weight, motor activity, or posture. These findings suggest that ramelteon is not likely to have benzodiazepine-like abuse or dependence liability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Endobronchial tumours in childhood

Like psychomotor stimulants, a weak amphetamine-like agent, such as phenylpropanolamine, enhances the analgesic effects of morphine (MOR). Thus, it is possible that full psychomotor stimulant potency is not required to increase the analgesic action of opiates. The validity of this assumption is here tested by studying the ability of (-)-norpseudoephedrine (NPE), an enantiomer of phenylpropanolamine and a metabolite of cathinone, to influence both the analgesic effects of MOR and its discriminative stimulus properties. In mice NPE (5.6-10.0-17.0 mg/kg i.p.) did not prolong the latency to lick or to remove paws from a plate warmed at 54 degrees C. However, it significantly potentiated the analgesic effect of 3.2 mg/kg of MOR. These results were replicated in rats by use of the formalin test, which measures the numbers of hind paw flinches produced by injecting 50 microl of formalin into the dorsal surface of the paw. The higher dose of NPE (17 mg/kg) increased the effect of sub-analgesic doses of MOR (0.56 and 1.0 mg/kg). In rats trained to discriminate between 0.5 mg/kg of amphetamine and solvent in a two-lever operant behavior reinforced by water access. NPE induced a dose-dependent increment of drug lever responding from 0% at 1.0 mg/kg to 100% at 32.0 mg/kg. In contrast, NPE did not generalize for the MOR cue up to the dose of 56.0 mg/kg, which produced a substantial reduction of the response rate. However, when given in combination, NPE attenuated the discriminative effects of MOR and potentiated its inhibitory action on the response rate. These results exclude a direct action of NPE on the mu opiate system. In conclusion, NPE preserves amphetamine-like properties and these properties are probably responsible for the interaction of the drug with the analgesic and discriminative effects of MOR. Therefore, this study contradicts the assumption that the analgesic effects of MOR can be enhanced by a sympathomimetic drug that lacks significant psychostimulant actions.     

Discriminative and reinforcing stimulus effects of nicotine, cocaine, and cocaine + nicotine combinations in rhesus monkeys.

Concurrent cigarette smoking and cocaine use is well documented. However, the behavioral pharmacology of cocaine and nicotine combinations is poorly understood, and there is a need for animal models to examine this form of polydrug abuse. The purpose of this study was twofold: first to assess the effects of nicotine on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, and second, to study self-administration of nicotine/cocaine combinations in a novel polydrug abuse model. In drug discrimination experiments, nicotine increased the discriminative stimulus effects of low cocaine doses in two of three monkeys, but nicotine did not substitute for cocaine in any monkey. Self-administration of cocaine and nicotine alone, and cocaine + nicotine combinations was studied under a second-order fixed ratio 2, variable ratio 16 (FR2[VR16:S]) schedule of reinforcement. Cocaine and nicotine alone were self-administered in a dose-dependent manner. The combination of marginally reinforcing doses of cocaine and nicotine increased drug self-administration behavior above levels observed with the same dose of either cocaine or nicotine alone. These findings indicate that nicotine may increase cocaine's discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys, and illustrate the feasibility of combining cocaine and nicotine in a preclinical model of polydrug abuse. Further studies of the behavioral effects of nicotine + cocaine combinations will contribute to our understanding the pharmacology of dual nicotine and cocaine dependence, and will be useful for evaluation of new treatment medications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Behavioral evaluation of modafinil and the abuse-related effects of cocaine in rhesus monkeys.

Modafinil is a central nervous system stimulant used to promote wakefulness, and it is being evaluated clinically as an agonist medication for treating stimulant abuse. This is the first report of the effects of modafinil on the abuse-related effects of cocaine in nonhuman primates. The behavioral effects of modafinil were examined in three studies. First, the discriminative stimulus effects of modafinil (3.2–32 mg/kg) were evaluated in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) trained to discriminate either low (0.18 mg/kg, IM) or high (0.4 mg/kg, IM) doses of cocaine from saline. Modafinil dose-dependently substituted for cocaine in 6 of 7 monkeys. In the second study, the effects of chronically administered modafinil (32–56 mg/kg/day, IV) on food- and cocaine-maintained (0.001–0.1 mg/kg/inj) operant responding were examined. Modafinil was administered 3 times/hr for 23 hr/day to ensure stable drug levels. Chronic treatment with 32 mg/kg/day modafinil selectively reduced responding maintained by intermediate and peak reinforcing doses of cocaine, but responding maintained by higher doses of cocaine was unaffected. Food-maintained behavior did not change during chronic modafinil treatment. In a third study, modafinil (32 and 56 mg/kg/day, IV) was examined in a reinstatement model. Modafinil transiently increased responding during extinction. These findings indicate that modafinil shares discriminative stimulus effects with cocaine and selectively reduces responding maintained by reinforcing doses of cocaine. In addition, modafinil reinstated cocaine-seeking behavior, which may reflect its cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects. These data support clinical findings and indicate that these preclinical models may be useful for predicting the effectiveness of agonist medications for drug abuse treatment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The effect of the reduction of colloid oncotic pressure, with and without reduction of osmolality, on post-traumatic cerebral edema

The fact that centrally acting analgesics have abuse potential commensurate with their analgesic activity raises the question of whether these effects are related. The abuse potential of drugs depends on their ability to produce reinforcing effects, which are mediated by a neural system that includes the ventral tegmental dopamine cells and their connections with the ventral striatum. Morphine and amphetamine are both powerful analgesics and have high abuse potential. Their analgesic and reinforcing effects are mediated by similar receptors, similar sites of action, and overlapping neural substrates. These coincidences suggest that reinforcers may produce analgesia by transforming the aversive affective state evoked by pain into a more positive affective state. The implications of this hypothesis and its relation to other known mechanisms of analgesia are discussed. The hypothesis predicts that drugs with reinforcing effects should produce analgesia. A survey of drugs acting through 21 classes of receptors reveals that in 13 classes there is evidence for both analgesic and reinforcing effects that are approximately equipotent. The GABA(A) agonists were found to be the only drugs with confirmed abuse potential that lack analgesic activity. The interpretation of this and several other anomalous cases is discussed.     

Nicotine-like discriminative stimulus effects of bupropion in rats.

Bupropion, a tobacco-cessation product, shares discriminative stimulus effects with cocaine and methamphetamine. The discriminative stimulus effects of these drugs, in turn, overlap with those of nicotine. This study investigated the overlap in discriminative stimulus effects of bupropion and nicotine. Rats were trained to discriminate 0.4 mg/kg (-)-nicotine from saline in 2-lever drug discrimination. Both nicotine and bupropion substituted for nicotine: however nicotine's effects were blocked by the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine, whereas those of bupropion were not. These results suggest that bupropion may be producing its nicotine-like discriminative stimulus effect though a different mechanism that nicotine. Give bupropion's shared pharmacology with dopamine transport inhibitors, these effects may be produced in part through bupropion's actions on dopaminergic neurotransmission. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Biphalin, an enkephalin analog with unexpectedly high antinociceptive potency and low dependence liability in vivo, selectively antagonizes excitatory opioid receptor functions of sensory neurons in culture

The mechanism of action of the dimeric enkephalin peptide, biphalin (Tyr-D-Ala-Gly-Phe-NH2)2, which was previously shown to have remarkable high antinociceptive potency and low dependence liability in vivo, has now been studied by electrophysiologic analyses of its effects on the action potential duration (APD) of nociceptive types of sensory dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons in culture. Acute application of biphalin (pM-microM) elicited only dose-dependent, naloxone-reversible inhibitory (APD-shortening) effects on DRG neurons. Furthermore, at pM concentrations that evoked little or no alteration of the APD of DRG neurons biphalin selectively antagonized excitatory (APD-prolonging) effects of low (fM-nM) concentrations of bimodally-acting mu and delta opioid agonists and unmasked potent inhibitory effects of these opioids. This dual opioid inhibitory-agonist/excitatory-antagonist property of biphalin is remarkably similar to that previously observed in studies of the ultra-potent opioid analgesic, etorphine on DRG neurons and in sharp contrast to the excitatory agonist action of most mu, delta and kappa opioid alkaloids and peptides when tested at low (pM-nM) concentrations. Chronic treatment of DRG neurons with high (microM) concentrations of biphalin did not result in supersensitivity to the excitatory effects of naloxone nor in tolerance to opioid inhibition effects, in contrast to the excitatory opioid supersensitivity and tolerance that develop in chronic morphine- or DADLE-treated, but not chronic etorphine-treated, neurons. These studies on DRG neurons in vitro may help to account for the unexpectedly high antinociceptive potency and low dependence liability of biphalin as well as etorphine in vivo.     

The influence of caffeine on nicotine's discriminative stimulus, subjective, and reinforcing effects.

Caffeine may acutely alter the discriminative stimulus and subjective effects of nicotine, perhaps explaining the association of coffee intake with smoking status. In this study, smokers were initially trained to discriminate 20 μg/kg nicotine by nasal spray from placebo (0). Then, generalization of nicotine discrimination was tested, using both 2- and 3-choice ("novel" option) procedures, across a range of doses (0-20 μg/kg) following pretreatment with 0, 2.5, and 5.0 mg/kg caffeine p.o. Nicotine reinforcement was assessed after the end of generalization testing using a choice procedure. Caffeine pretreatment did not alter nicotine discrimination and self-administration. Caffeine and nicotine influenced some subjective and cardiovascular responses, but there were no interaction effects except for diastolic blood pressure. These results do not support the notion that caffeine acutely alters nicotine's discriminative stimulus, subjective, or reinforcing effects. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Generalization of D-, L- and DL-chlorpheniramine and zolantidine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine

We recently demonstrated that some H-antagonists have cocaine or methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, the effects of optical isomers of chlorpheniramine (D-, L- and DL-forms) on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine and methamphetamine were examined in rats trained to discriminate between cocaine (10.0 mg/kg) or methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and saline, to determine whether these effects of H1-antagonists are mediated by the blockade of H-receptors. In generalization tests with optical isomers of chlorpheniramine, the D-, L- and DL-forms all completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but did not generalize to those of methamphetamine. Dose-generalization by the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine did not correlate with the H-antagonistic potency of these drugs. These results suggest that all of the optical isomers of chlorpheniramine have cocaine-like discriminative stimulus effects, but that these effects are not mediated by H1-receptor blockade. On the other hand, the H2-antagonist, zolantidine, generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine, but not to those of cocaine, suggesting that zolantidine may have methamphetamine-like discriminative stimulus effects. In the present study, GBR12909 (dopamine uptake inhibitor) completely generalized to the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, but not to those of methamphetamine, whereas apomorphine (dopamine receptor agonist) generalized more potently to the discriminative stimulus effects of methamphetamine than to those of cocaine. These findings imply that although the dopaminergic system plays an important role in the discriminative stimulus effects of both cocaine and methamphetamine, there may be differences between their effects.     

A Comparison of the Discriminative Stimulus Effects of Δ?-Tetrahydrocannabinol and O-1812, a Potent and Metabolically Stable Anandamide Analog, in Rats.

Efforts to determine whether Δ?-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ?-THC) and anandamide elicit similar discriminative stimulus effects have yielded conflicting results. The difficulty in establishing a discriminative cue to anandamide may be due to its metabolic instability. Rats were trained to discriminate either Δ?-THC or O-1812, a metabolically stable anandamide analog, from vehicle to avoid this issue. O-1812 and Δ?-THC substituted for each other; however, both drugs were more potent in the O-1812-trained rats. Further, O-1812 only substituted for Δ?-THC at response rate decreasing doses. The CB? antagonist, SR141716A, blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs but augmented their rate effects. O-1839, a VR? agonist, failed to substitute for either cannabinoid. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ?-THC and O-1812 are similar, but subtle differences also exist. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Evaluation of the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in combination with (+)-AJ76 or clozapine

Because self-administration and discrimination of a drug by animals correlate with its abuse and subjective effects in humans, interventions that modify the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of the drug may be useful in the treatment of its abuse. The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of the putative dopamine autoreceptor antagonist (+)-AJ76 (AJ) or the atypical antipsychotic clozapine (CLZ) on the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine in monkeys. One group of rhesus monkeys (n = 6) was allowed to self-administer cocaine (0.03 or 0.1 mg/kg/injection i.v. fixed-ratio 10, 2 hr/day). A second group of monkeys (n = 5) was trained to discriminate cocaine (0.2 or 0.4 mg/kg i.m., 10 min presession) from saline in a two lever, food-reinforced, drug discrimination paradigm. When behavior was stable, AJ or CLZ was administered i.m., 15 or 30 min presession. Intermediate doses of both compounds (1.0-3.0 mg/kg of AJ; 0.3-1.0 mg/kg of CLZ) increased cocaine self-administration, while responding remained evenly distributed over the session. A higher dose of CLZ decreased cocaine self-administration in an apparently nonspecific manner. When combined with saline, partial substitution for cocaine was seen in one of three monkeys with AJ and in none with CLZ. In combination with the training dose of cocaine in the discrimination experiment, both AJ and CLZ decreased drug appropriate responding by at least 50% in two of four monkeys, but had little or no effect in the other monkeys up to doses that completely suppressed lever pressing (6.4 mg/kg of AJ; 3.2 mg/kg of CLZ). Taken together, the present findings suggest that any blockade of the reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine by AJ and CLZ was, at best, partial. Furthermore, the stimulant effects of AJ observed in rats were not prominent in monkeys.     

Antagonism of cocaine's reinforcing and discriminative stimulus effects by !a-flupenthixol.

Examined the effects of the D?/D? dopamine receptor antagonist α-flupenthixol in animal models designed to assess abuse-related behavioral effects of cocaine. Rhesus monkeys self-administered cocaine (17 or 33 μg/kg/injection, iv) during 1-hr daily sessions; periods of food-maintained behavior preceded and followed cocaine access. α-Flupenthixol (0.003–0.03 mg/kg, iv) increased self-administration rates, indicating an antagonism of cocaine's reinforcing effects but decreased rates of food-maintained responding. α-Flupenthixol (0.03 mg/kg) blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine (0.3 mg/kg) in squirrel monkeys but did not do so in rats trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline. On the basis of available animal data and preliminary clinical trials, α-flupenthixol may warrant further study as a cocaine abuse pharmacotherapy. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Amphetamine-like discrimination stimulus effects of ephedrine and its stereoisomers in pigeons.

This study assessed the discriminative stimulus effects of (±)-ephedrine and its stereoisomers in pigeons discriminating 1.0 mg/kg of amphetamine from saline. Amphetamine, (±)-, (-)-, and (+)-ephedrine, and cocaine occasioned greater than 80% drug-key responding with the following rank order of potency: amphetamine > cocaine > (-)-ephedrine ≥ (±)-ephedrine ≥ (+)-ephedrine. Neither the α-adrenergic antagonist, phentolamine, nor the β-adrenergic antagonist, propranolol, antagonized the effects of amphetamine or (±)-ephedrine. In contrast, the dopamine receptor antagonist, haloperidol, antagonized the discriminative stimulus effects of amphetamine and (±)-ephedrine as well as those of (-)- and (+)-ephedrine. These results indicate that, like cocaine, (±)-ephedrine and its stereoisomers share discriminative stimulus effects with amphetamine. Moreover, these effects appear to be the result of increased activity in dopaminergic systems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Antipunishment activity of diazepam in rats trained to discriminate diazepam from vehicle.

The anxiolytic and discriminative stimulus effects of drugs in the same rats during a single session were examined in this study. Rats were trained to discriminate diazepam (5 mg/kg) from vehicle in a 2-lever drug discrimination procedure and were then trained to press a 3rd lever under a multiple fixed-interval (60 sec), fixed-ratio 5 + shock schedule of food reward. Diazepam produced substitution for itself in all rats; however, it produced antipunishment effects in some of the rats, suggesting that its discriminative stimulus and antipunishment effects are separable. In contrast, the N-methyl-{d}-aspartate antagonists, NPC 17742 and phencyclidine, failed to substitute fully for diazepam and did not increase punished responding in any of the rats. These results are consistent with those of studies showing that drugs from this class produce weaker antipunishment effects than diazepam does. The potential utility of this new method is that it allows direct comparisons of the antipunishment and discriminative stimulus effects of putative anxiolytic drugs during a single session with the same animals. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Opioid receptors in the midbrain periaqueductal gray regulate prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning.

The authors used a within-subject blocking design to study the role of ventrolateral periaqueductal gray (v1PAG) opioid receptors in regulating prediction errors during Pavlovian fear conditioning. In Stage I, the authors trained rats to fear conditioned stimulus (CS) A by pairing it with shock. In Stage II, CSA and CSB were copresented and followed with shock. Two novel stimuli, CSC and CSD, were also copresented and followed with shock in Stage II. CSA blocked fear from accruing to CSB. Blocking was prevented by systemic pretreatment with naloxone. Blocking was also prevented in a dose-dependent and neuroanatomically specific fashion by vlPAG infusions of the μ-opioid receptor antagonist CTAP. These experiments show that v1PAG μ-opioid receptors contribute to Pavlovian fear learning by regulating predictive error. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

The discriminative stimulus and its reputation: Role in the instigation of drug abuse.

The conditions that permitted the oral self-administration of a drug solution to develop as a reinforcing event for rats, so that a drug solution was preferred to a concurrently available vehicle (water), were elucidated. The genesis of a preference for a solution depended importantly on a history wherein the discriminative stimulus (a light SD) present in proximity to the drug-solution location had been associated with the self-administration of an ethanol solution. Once the SD was established, it stably determined fluid choice even if that fluid was a 2nd source of water. Results indicate that the sources of persistence and malleability of drug abuse behavior may lie in the instigating properties of established discriminative stimuli. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Assessment of the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine antagonist PNU-99194A in rats: comparison with psychomotor stimulants

The present study examined the discriminative stimulus effects of the D3 dopamine receptor antagonist PNU-99194A [5,6-di-methoxy-2-(dipropylamino)indan-hydrochloride] in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Eight rats were trained to discriminate cocaine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) from saline in a two-choice, water-reinforced drug discrimination procedure. In tests of stimulus generalization, PNU-99194A (1.25-40.0 mg/kg, s.c. and i.p.) did not substitute for cocaine. PNU-99194A (5.0-20 mg/kg) also did not significantly block the discrimination of cocaine (10 mg/kg), nor did it potentiate a low dose (1.25 mg/kg) of cocaine. A separate group of eight rats were trained to discriminate PNU-99194A from saline. These subjects met the discrimination criterion within an average of 68 (S.E.M. = 6.5) training sessions; the ED50 for PNU-99194A was 2.6 mg/kg. In stimulus generalization tests, cocaine (1.25-10 mg/kg) did not substitute for PNU-99194A, when administered by either i.p. or by s.c. injection. In addition, neither amphetamine (0.25-1.0 mg/kg) nor caffeine (8.0-64 mg/kg) produced stimulus generalization in these rats. These results indicate that D3 receptors do not play a critical role in the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine. Furthermore, although PNU-99194A is capable of establishing and maintaining discriminative stimulus control in rats, the effects of this D3-preferring antagonist are dissimilar from those of psychomotor stimulants. Given the unique behavioral profile of D3 receptor antagonists, the potential utility of these agents as adjunctive treatments for psychostimulant abuse is discussed.     

Up-regulation of brain N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors following multiple intracerebroventricular injections of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5] enkephalin and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin II in mice

The effects of chronic administration of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin and [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin II, the selective agonists of the delta 1- and delta 2-opioid receptors, on the binding of [3H]MK-801, a noncompetitive antagonist of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, were determined in several brain regions of the mouse. Male Swiss-Webster mice were injected intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin or [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin II (20 micrograms/mouse) twice a day for 4 days. Vehicle injected mice served as controls. Previously we have shown that the above treatment results in the development of tolerance to their analgesic activity. The binding of [3H]MK-801 was determined in brain regions (cortex, midbrain, pons and medulla, hippocampus, striatum, hypothalamus and amygdala). At 5 nM-concentration, the binding of [3H]MK-801 was increased in cerebral cortex, hippocampus, and pons and medulla of [D-Pen2, D-Pen5]enkephalin treated mice. In [D-Ala2, Glu4]deltorphin II treated mice, the binding of [3H]MK-801 was increased in cerebral cortex and hippocampus. The changes in the binding were due to increases in the Bmax value of [3H]MK-801. It is concluded that tolerance to delta 1- and delta 2-opioid receptor agonists is associated with up-regulation of brain N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, however, some brain areas affected differ with the two treatments. The results are consistent with the recent observation from this laboratory that N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors antagonists block tolerance to the analgesic action of delta 1- and delta 2-opioid receptor agonists.     

Psychopharmacological effects of oxycodone in volunteers with and without generalized anxiety disorder.

A number of studies have documented a relationship between anxiety disorders and opioid misuse and abuse, and there is some data to suggest that some people use opioids in an attempt to reduce their anxiety. We tested the hypothesis that volunteers with an anxiety disorder would report a more positive spectrum of subjective effects (i.e., greater ratings of drug liking and wanting to take the drug again) from oxycodone, a mu opioid agonist, than would volunteers without the disorder, and that oxycodone would have greater reinforcing efficacy in volunteers with the anxiety disorder. In addition to subjective and reinforcing effects, the psychomotor and physiological effects of oxycodone also were assessed. Individuals with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD, n = 8) and nonanxious controls (CTL, n = 8) were administered 0, 10, and 20 mg oxycodone (per os) in 3 separate sessions. Oxycodone produced a number of effects in a dose-related fashion in both groups. However, on several subjective effects measures, only CTL participants reported effects of oxycodone (e.g., high, lightheaded). Neither group had statistically significant increases in peak liking or “take drug again” ratings in the oxycodone conditions relative to the placebo condition, and in neither group did the drug function as a reinforcer, as measured by the Multiple-Choice Procedure (Griffiths, Troisi, Silverman, & Mumford, 1993). Anxiety ratings were low in the GAD group (in the absence of drug), and this may have lessened the possibility of detecting a more positive spectrum of oxycodone effects in this group than in the CTL group. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)     

Continuous extrapleural intercostal nerve block for post thoracotomy analgesia in children

The influence of the nicotine antagonist dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DH beta E) was examined on various behavioural effects of nicotine in rats. Motor activity was recorded in photocell cages whereas discriminative stimulus effects were examined using two-lever drug discrimination procedures with a tandem schedule of food reinforcement (n = 8 throughout). DH beta E (0.1-3.2 mg/kg) failed to antagonise the decreases in motor activity that nicotine (0.4-0.6 mg/kg) produced in experimentally naive rats, whereas mecamylamine (1.5 mg/kg) completely blocked this effect of nicotine. DH beta E (0.1-3.2 mg/kg) antagonised the increases in motor activity that nicotine (0.4 mg/kg) produced in rats with extensive previous exposure to both nicotine and the photocell apparatus. In rats trained to discriminate either 0.1 or 0.4 mg/kg nicotine from saline, DH beta E (0.1-3.2 mg/kg) blocked the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine. The block of the discriminative effect could be reversed by increasing the dose of nicotine; DH beta E (1.6 mg/kg) shifted the dose-response curve for nicotine discrimination to the right by a factor of 9.4. In addition, nicotine in doses of 0.32-0.64 mg/kg decreased the overall rate of lever pressing but DH beta E (1.6 mg/kg) did not influence the dose-response curve for this effect. Thus, DH beta E potently blocked the locomotor activating and discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine at doses that did not antagonise its locomotor depressant and operant response rate-reducing effects. This selective blockade supports the involvement of different subtypes of nicotinic receptor in the mediation of diverse behavioural effects. Furthermore, the rightward shift of the dose-response curve for nicotine discrimination suggested a competitive mode of action for DH beta E.