首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到5条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Efforts to determine whether Δ?-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ?-THC) and anandamide elicit similar discriminative stimulus effects have yielded conflicting results. The difficulty in establishing a discriminative cue to anandamide may be due to its metabolic instability. Rats were trained to discriminate either Δ?-THC or O-1812, a metabolically stable anandamide analog, from vehicle to avoid this issue. O-1812 and Δ?-THC substituted for each other; however, both drugs were more potent in the O-1812-trained rats. Further, O-1812 only substituted for Δ?-THC at response rate decreasing doses. The CB? antagonist, SR141716A, blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of both drugs but augmented their rate effects. O-1839, a VR? agonist, failed to substitute for either cannabinoid. These results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of Δ?-THC and O-1812 are similar, but subtle differences also exist. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

2.
The acute and chronic effects of ramelteon, an MT?/MT? receptor agonist, were evaluated in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) to assess discriminative stimulus effects in comparison with traditional benzodiazepine receptor agonists and to assess physical dependence potential. Discriminative effects of ramelteon were compared with midazolam in untreated monkeys and in diazepam-dependent monkeys that discriminated flumazenil. Dependence potential of ramelteon after daily 1-year administration (and intermittent discontinuation) was evaluated with standard operant procedures. Ramelteon did not produce benzodiazepine-like discriminative stimulus effects at doses up to 10 mg/kg. Long-term treatment or its discontinuation had no significant effect on spontaneous behavior, operant behavior, body weight, motor activity, or posture. These findings suggest that ramelteon is not likely to have benzodiazepine-like abuse or dependence liability. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

3.
This study examined whether the cannabinoid antagonist, SR 141716A, could be established as a discriminative stimulus in rhesus monkeys treated with Δ?-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ?-THC). Stimulus control was established with SR 141716A (1.0 mg/kg) in 3 Δ?-THC-treated monkeys (1.12 mg/kg/day) in 113-124 sessions. The SR 141716A discriminative stimulus was dose related, attenuated by an acute injection of Δ?-THC, and not mimicked by cocaine or ketamine. SR 141716A-appropriate responding occasioned by temporary discontinuation of Δ?-THC treatment was attenuated by Δ?-THC and not ketamine. The SR 141716A discriminative stimulus in Δ?-THC-treated monkeys appears to be mediated by cannabinoid receptors and could be related to Δ?-THC withdrawal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

4.
Asymmetrical generalization between drugs on drug-discrimination procedures has been demonstrated for sedative and stimulant drugs in animals and to some extent with sedative drugs in humans. The aim of this experiment was to examine the discriminative-stimulus effects of d-amphetamine in methylphenidate-trained humans. A previous study demonstrated that methylphenidate substitutes for d-amphetamine in d-amphetamine-trained humans. Six healthy human participants first learned to discriminate 30 mg oral methylphenidate. Doses of oral methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, triazolam, and placebo were then tested to determine whether they share discriminative-stimulus and self-reported effects with 30 mg methylphenidate. Methylphenidate and d-amphetamine dose-dependently increased methylphenidate-appropriate responding and produced prototypical stimulant-like effects. Triazolam produced low levels of methylphenidate-appropriate responding and prototypical sedative-like effects. The results of this experiment are concordant with previous studies and suggest that the behavioral effects of oral methylphenidate and d-amphetamine overlap extensively and that the discriminative-stimulus effects of methylphenidate and d-amphetamine are symmetrical. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

5.
Concurrent cigarette smoking and cocaine use is well documented. However, the behavioral pharmacology of cocaine and nicotine combinations is poorly understood, and there is a need for animal models to examine this form of polydrug abuse. The purpose of this study was twofold: first to assess the effects of nicotine on the discriminative stimulus effects of cocaine, and second, to study self-administration of nicotine/cocaine combinations in a novel polydrug abuse model. In drug discrimination experiments, nicotine increased the discriminative stimulus effects of low cocaine doses in two of three monkeys, but nicotine did not substitute for cocaine in any monkey. Self-administration of cocaine and nicotine alone, and cocaine + nicotine combinations was studied under a second-order fixed ratio 2, variable ratio 16 (FR2[VR16:S]) schedule of reinforcement. Cocaine and nicotine alone were self-administered in a dose-dependent manner. The combination of marginally reinforcing doses of cocaine and nicotine increased drug self-administration behavior above levels observed with the same dose of either cocaine or nicotine alone. These findings indicate that nicotine may increase cocaine's discriminative stimulus and reinforcing effects in rhesus monkeys, and illustrate the feasibility of combining cocaine and nicotine in a preclinical model of polydrug abuse. Further studies of the behavioral effects of nicotine + cocaine combinations will contribute to our understanding the pharmacology of dual nicotine and cocaine dependence, and will be useful for evaluation of new treatment medications. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved)  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号