Incidence of neoplastic polyps in the ileal pouch of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after restorative proctocolectomy

PURPOSE: Although adenomatous polyps and even adenocarcinomas have been found in the terminal ileum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, the prevalence of neoplastic changes in the pouches of patients who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy is unknown. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of pelvic pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Patients in a polyposis registry who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy were recruited. Demographic, surgical, pathologic, and endoscopic data were obtained from patient records. Video pouchoscopy was done after two enemas and representative biopsies were taken. RESULTS: Of 102 eligible patients, 26 (17 males and 9 females) participated. Median age at ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was 31 (range, 12-58) years. Median follow-up period was 66 (11-156) months. Adenomas were found in the pouch of 11 (42 percent) patients, in the terminal ileum above the pouch in 1 patient, and in the anal canal of 4 patients. Among patients with pouch polyps, three patients had one lesion, three patients had two lesions, and five patients had more than ten lesions. The incidence of polyps increased steadily with time from restorative proctocolectomy. There was no relation between the incidence of pouch polyposis and the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. CONCLUSIONS: Proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is associated with a significant risk of pouch neoplasia in familial adenomatous polyposis patients. The severity of pouch adenomas was not related either to the severity of colonic or duodenal disease. The pelvic pouches of all patients with familial adenomatous polyposis who have undergone restorative proctocolectomy should be examined periodically.     

Omission of temporary diversion in restorative proctocolectomy--is it safe?

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and functional outcome of restorative proctocolectomy (RP) without diversion. METHODS: Fifty patients underwent RP without diversion for ulcerative colitis (82 percent), familial adenomatous polyposis (12 percent), and indeterminate colitis (6 percent). The perioperative course and functional outcome of these patients were compared with another group of 50 patients undergoing RP with diverting ileostomy during the same time period (1989-1991) and closely matched for age, gender, surgeon, diagnosis, extent and duration (median, 10 years) of colitis, prior colectomy (approximately 22 percent), steroid use (40 percent), type of pouch, distance of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis from the dentate line (median, 1.5 cm), and the duration of follow-up (median, 12 months). All patients had a stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without mucosectomy and a smooth conduct of the operation. RESULTS: There was no operative mortality. Anastomotic leaks and pelvic abscess were more common in patients without ileostomy (7/50 or 14 percent vs. 2/50 or 4 percent); 8 of these 9 patients were taking > or = 20 mg of prednisone/day. Septic complications requiring relaparotomy (6 percent vs. 0 percent), prolonged ileus, and fever of unknown origin (10 percent vs. 4 percent) were also more common in patients without ileostomy. Despite similar functional results at 6 weeks and at 12 months after initial pouch function, patients without ileostomy had a poorer quality of life index (5 vs. 8; 10 being best) in the early period (0-6 weeks) of pouch function. CONCLUSION: In equally favorable cases, RP without diversion is not as safe as RP with diversion, especially in patients taking > or = 20 mg of prednisone/day.     

Quality of life after proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis

Nowadays, restorative proctocolectomy is considered the "gold standard" in the surgical therapy of ulcerative colitis. Alternative procedures such as Brooke ileostomy or Kock pouch are limited to special indications. Preservation of function is the decisive advantage of the ileoanal pouch, but preservation of function is not equal to quality of life. Quality of life is a multidimensional concept that is difficult to define and measure. Quality of life can only be assessed by standardized and validated quality-of-life questionnaires. Preoperatively, patients with ulcerative colitis have a restricted quality of life, depending on the intensity of their disease. Proctocolectomy is the curative therapy and improves quality of life. When evaluating quality of life it is not essential if patients are treated by Brooke ileostomy or restorative proctocolectomy. The advantage of restorative proctocolectomy is the improvement in some aspects such as sexuality and physical activity. The "Total Quality-of-Life Index" is not improved. Preoperatively, patients should be informed that preservation of function by restorative proctocolectomy is accompanied by an increased postoperative morbidity in comparison to other procedures. Decreased quality-of-life results when complications occur postoperatively that cannot be controlled over a long period of time. In some cases excision of the ileoanal pouch may be the most sensible way of solving the problems. On the other hand, patients without complications and good function after ileoanal pouch procedure may achieve a quality of life comparable to that of healthy controls. Preoperatively, patients should be aware of this risk-benefit relationship and should share the responsibility of the decision for or against restorative proctocolectomy.     

Factors related to the presence of IgA class antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVES: Few studies have assessed the IgA antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity in ulcerative colitis patients and there is no information about factors related to its synthesis and its status after colectomy. The aims of the study were to assess the serum IgA ANCA prevalence in ulcerative colitis patients, both nonoperated and operated, and to determine the clinical factors related to this positivity. METHODS: Fifty-four ulcerative colitis patients, 63 ulcerative colitis colectomized patients (32 with Brooke's ileostomy and 31 with ileal pouch anal anastomosis), and 24 controls were studied. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies were detected by specific indirect immunofluorescent assays. RESULTS: The percentage of IgA ANCA was significantly higher in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (45%) than in patients with Brooke's ileostomy (22%). There were no differences related to the presence of pouchitis in ileal pouch anal anastomosis patients. Patients with nonoperated extensive colitis (47%) had a significantly higher percentage of IgA ANCA than patients with proctitis (19%). Total percentage of ANCA (IgA and/or IgG) tended to be higher in ulcerative colitis and in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis than in patients with Brooke's ileostomy. However, in ileal pouch anal anastomosis patients, ANCA positivity was mainly due to exclusive IgA production. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of ulcerative colitis patients, and especially colectomized patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, had IgA ANCA, suggesting that ANCA production in ulcerative colitis might be stimulated by an immune reaction in the intestinal mucosa.     

Usefulness of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled anastomosis in left sided colorectal reconstructions. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: District hospital, UK. SUBJECTS: 218 Consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal reconstructions with stapled anastomoses between July 1980 and July 1994. INTERVENTIONS: 154 Anterior resections of the rectum using single or double stapled anastomoses, 37 rejoining after Hartmann's operations, and 28 restorative proctocolectomies with formation of J pouch ileoanal anastomoses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: There were 5/154 clinical anastomotic leaks after anterior resection of the rectum and 1/28 after stapled J pouch ileoanal anastomoses. There were no leaks after rejoining of Hartmann's. The overall clinical leak rate was therefore 3%. 11/154 tumours recurred locally after anterior resection of the rectum (7%) during a mean follow up of 18 months, and 8 (73%) developed within 2 years of operation. All but one recurrence developed after single stapled anastomosis. Dukes' staging remains the most reliable prognostic indicator of the local recurrence of the tumour. There were five postoperative deaths after anterior resection but none after Hartmann's procedure or J pouch ileoanal anastomosis, giving an overall postoperative mortality of 2.3%. CONCLUSION: The use of stapling instruments in left sided colorectal anastomosis is safe and technically easy, with a low clinical anastomotic leak rate and an acceptable rate of local recurrence after anterior resection of the rectum.     

Topical preparations for burns and their evaluation

Omission of a temporary ileostomy in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy is controversial. Although fewer operations may be required and some complications avoided, the risks of anastomotic dehiscence and pelvic sepsis may be greater. Patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy with no ileostomy (Group NI, n = 72) were compared retrospectively with patients given a conventional loop ileostomy (Group I, n = 30). Criteria for avoiding faecal diversion included: absence of severe acute colitis, good nutritional status and favourable surgery with creation of a sound, tension-free anastomosis. Steroid intake was not a contraindication to single-stage surgery. Delayed stomas were necessary in 8% of Group NI. For Groups NI and I, the rates of anastomotic leak (3% vs 3%), pelvic sepsis without demonstrable leak (3% vs 0%), pouch fistula (3% vs 10%) and intestinal obstruction (8% vs 3%) were similar. Closure of the temporary ileostomy in Group I was associated with a 10% complication rate. Cumulative post-operative hospital stay was significantly less in Group NI (median 11 vs 16 days). Functional results at 1 year were similar. A temporary loop ileostomy can be safely avoided in carefully selected patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.     

Musculoaponeurotic fibromatosis of both bones of forearm

PURPOSE: To compare the incidence of stenosis after hand-sewn and stapled ileoanal anastomosis. Stenosis of the ileoanal anastomosis occurs in 5-16% of patients undergoing a restorative proctocolectomy but the incidence using a stapled technique is unknown. METHODS: Between 1976 and 1990, 266 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy or proctectomy at one hospital. In two hundred and eighteen the anastomosis was hand sewn and stapled in 48 (single 33; double 15). RESULTS: Stenosis occurred in 31 (14.2%) of the hand-sewn and in 19 (39.6%) of the stapled anastomoses. This difference was highly significant (P < 0.001). Stenosis was not related to the size of the staple head used or to the stapling technique. There was no relationship between the development of stenosis and pelvic sepsis. Twenty six (hand-sewn 16, stapled 10) of the 48 patients with stenosis needed dilatation under general anaesthetic. CONCLUSION: Stapled anastomoses may result in a high incidence of anastomotic stenosis.     

Coordinated activity of the new "rectum" and anal sphincter after sphincter-saving resection of the rectum for colitis or carcinoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine whether coordinated activity exists across a stapled enteroanal anastomosis. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were studied for a median of one year after complete excision of the rectum and stapled enteroanal anastomosis; 12 patients underwent low anterior resection with coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma, and 17 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis. RESULTS: Maximum anal resting pressures were slightly lower after coloanal anastomosis than after ileoanal anastomosis [median range, 56 (11-60) cm H2O, cf 69 (40-107) cm H2O, P = NS]. During distention of the neorectum, anal sphincter pressures at 2.5, 1.5, and 0.5 cm from the anal verge were significantly lower after coloanal anastomosis compared with after ileoanal anastomosis (P < 0.01 at each station). The volume of neorectal distention required to produce maximal inhibition of the anal sphincter was significantly less after coloanal anastomosis at 50 (range, 20-60) ml of air than after ileoanal anastomosis at 240 (range, 100-420) ml of air (P < 0.01). Minor fecal leakage and urgency of bowel action were significantly more common after coloanal anastomosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Alterations in the dynamic response of the anal sphincter to distention of the neorectum may explain why the clinical results were better after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis than after coloanal anastomosis.     

Attempts to aid the adaptation of pelvic pouch before temporary ileostomy closure

Most patients experience a high stool frequency immediately following the closure of the temporary ileostomy after total colectomy and ileoanal pouch reconstruction. Adaptation occurs within the ensuing weeks to reach a plateau in about three months. Increasing volumes of liquid nutrients were injected, twice daily for two months, into the pelvic pouch through a mucous ileal fistula proximal to the pouch before closing the temporary ileostomy. With this method the number of evacuations per 24 hours was significantly reduced during the first few weeks following the reestablishment of intestinal continuity, compared with a control group (average, 8.5 vs. 18.2, respectively). Patients also had better continence and less urgency to defecate. We suggest this technique in patients undergoing pelvic ileal reconstruction with temporary ileostomy.     

Contribution of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics in determining pouch function

AIM: To determine the contributions of gastrointestinal transit and pouch characteristics to bowel frequency in patients with an ileoanal reservoir and no pouchitis. METHODS: Twenty one patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy, with ileostomy closure at least eight months previously, and who had no history of pouchitis were recruited. They were prospectively classified on the basis of their bowel frequency: 11 patients had good pouch function (bowel frequency less than six per day) and 10 had poor function (bowel frequency more than six per day). Gastrointestinal transit was studied using a dual isotope technique and anal and pouch physiological examination was performed on all patients. RESULTS: Lag phase, 25% and 50% gastric emptying, small bowel transit time, and 10% and 50% pouch filling times, all for solids and liquids, were not significantly different between patients with good and poor function. Anal manometry and pouch and anal electrical sensitivity were also similar in the two groups. The volume of air and water required to elicit an initial sensation and the urge to defaecate were similar in both groups, but the maximum tolerated volume to both air (525 v 245 ml, good v poor function, median values) and water (625 v 370 ml) infusion was significantly (both p < 0.02) lower in patients with poor function. CONCLUSION: Maximum tolerated volume in the pouch, which may reflect pouch size, sensitivity, compliance, or a combination of these is the major determinant of pouch function. Gastrointestinal transit does not seem to be an important determinant of function.     

Urinary changes in patients following restorative proctocolectomy

Following restorative proctocolectomy, the physiological function of the large intestine to absorb water and electrolytes is lost. Therefore, the kidney plays an important role in adjusting the water and electrolyte balance along with the ileal pouch. The reservoir function of the ileal pouch, however, may affect the functional adaptation of urinary changes. To observe the functional adaptation of urinary changes in ileal pouch patients, their changes in urinary output and electrolytes were investigated. Urinary output, pH, and electrolytes were all measured at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery in patients with a J-pouch (n = 30) and compared with those in patients who had undergone ileostomy (n = 11) and healthy controls (n = 22). In the patients with a J-pouch, the urinary output, pH, and sodium concentration were significantly lower than those of the controls at 1 month after the operation. However, they gradually increased to near the control values at 1 year. In patients with an ileostomy, the urinary output, pH, and sodium concentration were lower than the control values up to 1 year postoperatively, but the urinary uric acid concentration was higher than that in the controls in both groups up to 1 year. The patients who had persistent aciduria were given a citrate mixture (3g/day), which effectively normalized the aciduria and also possibly prevented urinary uric acid stone formation.     

Ileoanal pouch function and release of peptide YY

PURPOSE: This study evaluates peptide tyrosine-tyrosine (PYY), intestinal transit, fecal retention time, and anal sphincter manometry in colectomized patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. METHODS: Plasma and pouch PYY, mouth-to-pouch transit time, fecal retention time, and anal canal pressures were studied in 27 patients with ileoanal pouches a mean of 50 (range, 3-84) months after loop ileostomy closure. RESULTS: Basal and peak postprandial plasma PYY were significantly reduced in patients with pouches compared with controls (P < 0.0001). Pouch PYY was decreased compared with control ileal PYY (P = 0.0003). No significant correlation was noted between intestinal transit and total integrated PYY response in patients with pouches (r=0.36; P=0.06). Fecal retention time was related to postprandial total integrated response of plasma PYY (r=0.43; P=0.02), mouth-to-pouch transit (r=0.87; P < 0.0001), and resting (r=0.44; P=0.02) and squeeze (r=0.62; P=0.0006) anal sphincter pressures. CONCLUSIONS: Colectomized ileoanal patients with pouches showed decreased plasma and pouch PYY compared with controls. Intestinal transit was not significantly related to PYY release. However, prolonged pouch fecal retention was associated with greater PYY release, mouth-to-pouch transit, and anal sphincter pressures.     

Implantable control, telemetry, and solar energy system in the moving actuator type total artificial heart

The aim of this study was to determine whether a jejunal pouch would have a lower resting pressure, be more distensible, and have more interdigestive migrating myoelectric complexes and less fecal bacterial overgrowth than would an ileal pouch after proctocolectomy and pouch-distal rectal anastomosis. In six conscious dogs with a jejunal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis and six with an ileal pouch-distal rectal anastomosis (controls), pouch distensibility and motility were measured using a barostat and perfused pressure-sensitive catheters passed per anum, pouch electrical activity was recorded using chronically implanted electrodes, and the number of bacteria per gram of stool was assessed by culture. Dogs with a jejunal pouch had lower resting pouch pressures, more distensible pouches, faster frequencies of pacesetter potentials in the pouch, more phase 3 intervals of the interdigesive migrating myoelectric complex reaching the pouch, but similar numbers and types of bacteria in their stools compared to the dogs with an ileal pouch. We concluded that jejunal pouches have a lower resting pressure, are more distensible, have more cleansing contractions, but a similar fecal flora compared to ileal pouches. A jejunal pouch has features that make it an attractive alternative to an ileal pouch for pouch-distal rectal or pouch-anal canal anastomosis after proctocolectomy.     

Proctocolectomy with ileal W pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis, which is a relatively new procedure, has become a standard procedure for ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring surgical management. The main impact of this procedure is to cure patients of disease and to avoid permanent ileostomy, preserving better defecatory function and acceptable QOL. Some key aspects of our surgical procedure are as follows: 1) two or three separate staged operation, 2) W-shaped reservoir, 3) distal rectal mucosectomy and handsewn ileo-anal anastomosis, 4) short muscular cuff, and 5) temporary diverting ileostomy. Staged operation and diverting ileostomy are helpful to decrease risk of pelvic infection. Total removal of the rectal mucosa is necessary to cure the disease, and shorter muscular cuff decreases operating time and bleeding and thus the risk of pelvic sepsis. The W-shaped reservoir described by Nicholls brings both spontaneous defecation and improved function. We have adopted ileal W-pouch among several types of reservoir to 58 patients with UC since 1984, and found that a large and wide reservoir might allow better defecatory function. There were no cases of serious complications and no needs to remove the reservoir. Mean daily stool frequency was gradually decreased with time, and 4.9 stools per 24 hours at present day, and clinical score of neorectal function also gradually improved according to reduction of stool frequency. Seventy three percent of patients felt their defecatory function satisfactory and 89% of the patients recovered acceptable QOL no less than that obtained during the medically treated period.     

Profile of patients seeking psychiatric treatment from the adult public mental health services in Singapore

The practical procedures of ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) has developed through the two independent lines of thinking. The one idea involved pooling of the intestinal content in an ileal reservoir as S-shaped pelvic pouch by Parks. The other was the concept of rectal mucosal replacement by Peck who grafted a ileal mucosal segment within the totally denuded preserved rectal cuff. The author followed on the later concept and constructed an laterally anastomosed antiperistaltic looped ileum with which the pouch was able to joint directly to the anus in a side to end fashion to form a structure similar to the natural rectal ampulla and always spontaneously evacuable. Currently most of the surgeons in the world who perform IAA use the technique of the J pouch and in the present department, IAA has been performed on 150 patients with UC and 120 with FAP during the last 13 years and the number of these patients is ever increasing. These evidences suggest the operation that has been established is the superior above the other alternative techniques of proctocolectomy.     

Prospective study of morphologic and functional changes with time in the mucosa of the ileoanal pouch: functional appraisal using transmucosal potential differences

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to investigate the morphologic and functional changes with time in the mucosa of the ileoanal pouch. METHODS: A morphologic study by histopathologic analysis, mucosal morphometry, and mucin histochemistry and a functional study by analysis of transmucosal potential difference were performed in 27 patients with an ileoanal J-pouch after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. In 19 patients with a normal ileoanal pouch, two prospective follow-up analyses were performed after median functional pouch times of 14 and 39 months. We also evaluated eight patients with the diagnosis of pouchitis (median follow-up, 52.5 months). RESULTS: In the normal ileoanal pouch group, some degree of chronic and acute inflammatory infiltration was identified in 100 percent and 63.2 percent of cases, respectively, with no significant differences being observed between the two follow-up analyses. The mean villous atrophy index at the first and second follow-up was 0.54 and 0.52, respectively, significantly lower (P < 0.001; an indication of a greater degree of villous atrophy) than the value obtained from the control group with a healthy terminal ileum (0.77). The group of patients with pouchitis exhibited statistically significant differences in the degree of acute and chronic inflammatory infiltration, the extent of ulceration, the crypt depth, and the villous atrophy index, compared with patients without pouchitis. In the normal ileoanal pouch group, the median percentage of sulfomucin with each degree of atrophy (1=mild; 2=moderate; and 3=severe) was 2.6, 4.5, and 20.9 percent, respectively. In patients with pouchitis, the median percentage of sulfomucin was 5.9 percent. The mean transmucosal potential difference at the first follow-up (-25.3 mV) was significantly lower (P=0.001) than at the second (-30.4 mV). Significant differences were apparent with respect to both the normal ileum (-8.9 mV) and the normal rectum (-40.2 mV). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the ileal pouch behaves as a neorectum, with different degrees of colonic metaplasia from a morphologic and a functional perspective.     

Typical complications and their control after restorative proctocolectomy

The overall rate of complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is 60%. This rate, however, includes complications such as bowel-obstruction and hernias. Pouch-related complications occur after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with a frequency of 15-25%. In an analysis of the recent literature the main risk factors are: tension of the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, anastomotic leakage, lack of protective ileostomy, preoperatively undiagnosed Crohn's disease and the experience of the surgeon. We classified pouch related-complications into (1) surgical complications (leakage, bleeding, pelvic sepsis, fistulas); (2) technical problems (long S-pouch spout, rectal cuff stenosis, etc.); (3) functional problems (anal sphincter insufficiency, night incontinence, hypermotility, evacuation disorders); (4) pouchitis; (5) pouch neoplasias. Pathogenesis, diagnostic features, and medical and surgical therapy are discussed in detail. In our own series of 11 pouch-redo operations we had 6 pouch fistulas (3 related to Crohn's disease, 3 postoperative fistulas), 3 wrongly constructed pouches, 1 chronic pouchitis and 1 long S-pouch spout. In 3 cases the pouch had to be excised completely. Two patients remained with a permanent ileostomy. In 6 patients the pouch could be preserved on long term. Due to the technical complexity, the need to understand pathophysiology and the need for a differentiated diagnostic procedure, this operation should be performed only in specialised centers.     

Microsatellite instability and frameshift mutations in the Bax gene in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma

Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at higher risk for cancer. Risk factors are duration of disease, extent of colitis, associated primary sclerosing cholangitis and possibly early onset of UC in childhood. Epithelial dysplasias are considered as precursors of colorectal cancer within the concept of an inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence. Dysplasia originates multifocally and is difficult to identify by colonoscopy. Histomorphological diagnosis can also be problematical. Surveillance programs utilize colonoscopy with random biopsies to diagnose dysplasia in patients with risk factors. The efficiency of these programs can be markedly increased when certain rules are applied. The ultimate aim must be to perform a proctocolectomy in patients at higher risk before invasive cancer develops. With only a few exceptions, colorectal cancer in UC can be treated by restorative proctocolectomy. Partial resection of the colon should be avoided because of the high frequency of occult carcinomas and multifocal carcinogenesis. There are first results that indicate a higher risk for malignant deterioration in the terminal ileum. After an ileoanal pouch procedure patients with chronic pouchitis seem to have a higher risk for dysplasia. At the moment the risk for malignancy cannot be calculated because of the relatively short follow-up time after ileoanal pouch procedures. However, it is recommended that after restorative proctocolectomy patients be followed by endoscopy and random biopsies for the rest of their lives.     

Long-term quality of life after continence-preserving proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis

After ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), quality of life is a relevant factor for the assessment of the operation's success, in addition to postoperative morbidity and functional outcome. Between 1982 and 1995 restorative proctocolectomy was performed in 453 patients (UC: n = 332; FAP: n = 121) at the Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg. We studied postoperative quality of life through a long-term follow-up study (median follow-up time 43.2 months). This study 1 year or more following ileostomy closure of persons who had undergone J-pouch anastomosis (n = 243 total; UC n = 185, FAP n = 58) revealed that at the time of follow-up, the underlying disease (UC versus FAP) and successfully treated complications are without influence on the quality of life. The patient's age (P < 0.01) and the presence of unsuccessfully treated complications (P < 0.0001) showed a significant influence on the quality of life. There was a distinct relation between the functional index and the quality of life index (coefficient of correlation r = -0.714). However, quality of life, comparable to that of healthy controls, can be achieved with UC and FAP patients by restorative proctocolectomy only if postoperative complications can be avoided or are successfully treated.     

Restorative proctocolectomy with end to end pouch-anal anastomosis in patients over the age of fifty

This study was to examine whether 'fit' patients over the age of 50 who require elective surgery for ulcerative colitis are suitable candidates for restorative proctocolectomy, providing that they are continent before operation and that the anal sphincter is preserved in its entirety without stripping of the mucosa or endoanal anastomosis. Between 1986 and 1991, 18 patients 50 to 66 years old (median 55 years: nine men) underwent restorative proctocolectomy with end to end ileoanal anastomosis without mucosal stripping (12 quadruplicated (W), four duplicated (J), two no reservoir). The results were compared 12 (range three to 24) months later with those of 18 matched patients who were less than 50 years of age (median 34 years). In patients over 50, median resting anal pressure was 88 (range 44-131) cm water before and 80 (47-138) cm water after the operation (NS). In patients under 50, median resting anal pressure was 76 (51-128) cm water before and 77 (36-137) cm water after operation (NS). Resting anal pressure in older patients did not differ significantly from that in younger patients either before or after the operation. Both sensory and reflex anal functions were preserved as well after operation in the older patients as in the younger ones. The clinical results in patients over 50 were slightly inferior to the results for the younger patients, but the difference was small and not significant. Hence age alone is not a contraindication to restorative surgery provided that the anal sphincter is preserved in its entirety.