Improved specificity of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography compared to standard tests for evaluation of coronary artery disease in women presenting with chest pain

The detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) by noninvasive methods has been hindered in women by the high rate of false-positive results. To determine the feasibility and accuracy of transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography for identification of CAD in women, we studied 84 patients (age 51 +/- 11 years) who underwent symptom-limited exercise treadmill testing, exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy, and coronary angiography for evaluation of anginal chest pain. Of the 84 patients, 62 had normal coronary arteries or nonsignificant coronary lesions, and 22 had significant stenosis of > or = 1 major coronary artery. During treadmill exercise, repolarization changes were observed in 16 of 21 patients with CAD and in 19 of 60 patients with normal coronary arteries. With thallium scintigraphy, a reversible defect was observed in 19 of 22 patients with CAD and in 12 of 60 patients with normal coronary arteries. Regional wall motion abnormalities during dobutamine infusion developed in 18 of 22 patients with CAD and in none of the 62 patients with normal coronary arteries. All 3 tests had similar sensitivity for detection of CAD (76% for exercise treadmill test, 86% for thallium scintigraphy, and 82% for transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography). However, transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography had significantly higher specificity than the other 2 tests (100% vs 68% for exercise treadmill test and 80% for thallium scintigraphy; p = 0.0001). Thus, transesophageal dobutamine stress echocardiography is accurate for evaluation of CAD among women presenting with chest pain; its use should be considered when more conventional tests are equivocal or technically suboptimal.     

Dobutamine stress echocardiography: clinical utility and predictive value at various infusion rates

Dobutamine stress echocardiography has increasingly been used to assess patients for coronary artery disease. Despite the popularity of this test, the optimal dose of dobutamine has not been established. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography at various infusion doses and its utility as a predictor of perioperative risk in patients undergoing a noncardiac surgical procedure. One hundred thirteen consecutive patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography, subsequent cardiac catheterization and/or a noncardiac surgical procedure. Three patient groups were analyzed on the basis of peak dobutamine infusion rates (17 +/- 4, 29 +/- 2, and 40 +/- 0 micrograms/kg/min, respectively). The three groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, ejection fraction, and severity of coronary artery disease. In group I, the sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography were 74% and 33%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 78%. In group II, the sensitivity and specificity improved to 84% and 78%, with a positive predictive value of 89%. In group III, the sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 80%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 86%. In the noncardiac surgical group there was only one nonfatal cardiac complication among the 50 patients with a dobutamine echocardiogram, which was negative for evidence of inducible ischemia. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that dobutamine stress echocardiography should use an infusion rate of > or = 30 micrograms/kg/min to optimize diagnostic accuracy relative to angiographic coronary artery disease. A test that shows no evidence of new, inducible ischemia predicts a low risk of perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, even at an infusion rate as low as 20 microns/kg/min.     

Long-term prognostic significance of dobutamine echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: results of a 5-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVES:This study sought to assess the long-term prognostic utility of dobutamine stress echocardiography in predicting fatal and nonfatal cardiac events. BACKGROUND: Although dobutamine stress echocardiography has improved sensitivity and specificity for detection of coronary artery disease, little is known of its predictive value for long-term cardiac events. Therefore, we followed up 120 consecutive patients who underwent dobutamine echocardiography for suspected coronary disease from March 1989 to August 1991. METHODS: All patients presenting for coronary angiography for chest pain were eligible for recruitment. Follow-up was 100% complete at 5 years (range 3.0 to 6.1). Cardiac events were defined as cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction or the need for coronary revascularization (coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery). RESULTS: Positive (n = 78) and negative (n = 42) dobutamine test groups differed in their rates of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (37.2% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.001, respectively) and mortality. Of 26 total deaths, 22 occurred in the group with positive dobutamine test results (28% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.018); all 7 cardiac deaths occurred in this group as well (9% vs. 0%, p < 0.045). By multivariate regression analysis, positive results on dobutamine echocardiography remained independently predictive of future cardiac death after left ventricular ejection fraction and other clinical variables were accounted for. CONCLUSIONS: A positive finding on dobutamine echocardiography is an independent predictor of long-term cardiac mortality, whereas a negative finding confers a significantly reduced likelihood of cardiac death as much as 5 years from initial testing. We conclude that dobutamine stress echocardiography can be used to predict which patients with suspected coronary artery disease are at low risk for cardiac death and do not require concurrent nuclear or invasive testing.     

Diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography

PURPOSE: To analyze the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography. METHODS: We studied 304 consecutive patients using dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography who underwent coronary angiography within a month of the exam. Patients received high dobutamine doses associated or not with atropine. RESULTS: The global sensitivity was 92%, specificity was 72% and diagnostic accuracy was 87%. Analyzing 120 patients with normal LV function, we found sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 79% and accuracy of 82%. CONCLUSION: Dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography is an accurate method for the detection of coronary artery disease.     

Dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine stress echocardiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise stress test, analysis of agreement, and impact of antianginal treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the usefulness of dipyridamole echocardiography, dobutamine-atropine echocardiography, and exercise stress testing in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and to analyze the agreement among the tests. DESIGN: Performance of these three tests in random order on a consecutive cohort of patients. SETTING: A tertiary care and university center. PATIENTS: One hundred two consecutive patients with chest pain and no history of coronary artery disease. INTERVENTIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiography, dobutamine-atropine echocardiography, exercise stress testing, and coronary angiography. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Dobutamine-atropine test was positive in 49 (77%) of 63 patients with coronary artery disease, dipyridamole test in 49 (77%), and exercise stress test in 44 (68%; p = NS). Both echocardiographic tests showed an overall specificity (dipyridamole, 97%; dobutamine, 95%) higher than exercise stress test (79%; p < 0.05). Sensitivity of dipyridamole testing decreased from 93 to 61% (p = 0.002) if patients were receiving antianginal treatment but sensitivity of dobutamine-atropine testing was not affected (77% in patients receiving and not receiving treatment). When results were considered as positive-negative, agreement between dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine echocardiography was 85% (kappa = 0.70). With regards to regional analysis, concordance was good (93% for segments, kappa = 0.76; and 95% for coronary arteries, kappa = 0.92). Major complications were more frequent during dobutamine-atropine (n = 7) than during dipyridamole infusion (n = 2) (p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine-atropine and dipyridamole echocardiography have a similar sensitivity and a higher specificity than that obtained by exercise ECG for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Similar information is obtained with dipyridamole and dobutamine-atropine echocardiography. It is our thought that pharmacologic stress echocardiography should be used as a first-step test to rule out coronary artery disease in patients not capable of exercising.     

Exercise echocardiography with left atrial stimulation: advantages and limitations of the method

Exercise echocardiography seems a relatively reliable diagnostic technique for evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease. The prognostic aspects of the stress echo have widely been documented with the use of various stressors (exercise, dipyridamole, dobutamine, pacing). Rapid atrial pacing echocardiography is highly specific and sensitive technique for the detection of the coronary disease, especially in patients who are unable to perform an active stress test. This technique minimizes the factors decreasing image quality during exercise (chest wall movements and hyperventilation). Exercise echocardiography is safe, relatively cheap, and can be done in every hospital.     

Transport and storage of Helicobacter pylori from gastric mucosal biopsies and clinical isolates

Presence of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) identifies a high risk subgroup after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has recently emerged as a promising non invasive test to detect the presence and extent of coronary artery disease. Forty six consecutive patients (38 males, 8 females; mean age 48.6 +/- 10.4 years) of Q-wave acute myocardial infarction were subjected to submaximal treadmill test (TMT) and dobutamine stress echocardiography to see their ability to predict multivessel coronary artery disease as detected by coronary angiography before hospital discharge. Dobutamine infusion was started at 5 micrograms/kg/min to a maximum of 40 micrograms/kg/min, to achieve 70 percent of the age predicted heart rate. Appearance of new regional wall motion abnormality was interpreted as positive DSE for MVD. Mean peak infusion dose of dobutamine used in the study was 28.56 +/- 5.67 micrograms/kg/min. In none of the patients, the test had to be terminated due to side effects. The sensitivity and specificity of DSE to predict MVD was 80 percent and 93.7 percent, respectively as compared to 45 percent and 86 percent for submaximal TMT. Thus, DSE in patients of AMI before hospital discharge is a safe procedure with fairly accurate prediction of multivessel coronary artery disease.     

A case report of ulcerative colitis complicated with protein losing enteropathy and colon cancer in a young female

AIMS: To assess the ability of dobutamine echocardiography to detect multivessel coronary artery disease and to determine predictive factors for multivessel disease with or without beta-blockers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography and coronary angiography (evaluation of chest pain 76, extent of coronary disease after myocardial infarction 19, other indications 6). RESULTS: Ten patients in whom the test was prematurely terminated were excluded. Out of 91 patients who underwent dobutamine echocardiography, 54 patients had multivessel disease (sensitivity of dobutamine test 93%, specificity 46%). Heart rate at the maximum dose of dobutamine or atropine was 88 +/- 21 beats/min for multivessel diseases and 104 +/- 21 beats/min without multivessel disease (p < 0.001). A cut-off value < 94 beats/min discriminated patients at risk for multivessel disease. After adjusting for treatment with beta-blockers, heart rate < 94 beats/min, ECG signs of ischemia, and abnormalities on baseline echocardiogram with remote asynergies during dobutamine testing were independent predictors of multivessel disease in the multivariate analysis (probability > 90% when at least two factors were present). CONCLUSION: A heart rate < 94 beats/min at peak dose of dobutamine or after atropine, ECG signs of ischemia, and the presence of abnormalities on echocardiogram at rest with remote asynergies during dobutamine stress testing were independent predictive factors of multivessel coronary artery disease.     

Primary rhabdomyosarcoma of the brain: observations on a case with clinical and radiological evidence of cure

BACKGROUND: After heart transplantation, accelerated coronary vasculopathy is a major factor that limits long-term survival and is usually detected by serial coronary angiography. The aim of this study was to determine whether dobutamine stress echocardiography could accurately identify the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. METHODS: Two sequential controls by dobutamine stress echocardiography were performed at an 18-month interval in 37 heart transplant recipients at the time of their routine coronary angiography. The first control (control 1) occurred 37+/-20 months after transplantation, and the second control (control 2) occurred after 56+/-21 months. Standard echocardiographic views were acquired at baseline and at incremental dobutamine infusion levels. Regional wall motion score was calculated in a 16-segment model, and each segment was graded from 1 (normal) to 4 (dyskinesia). Visual and quantitative coronary angiographic analysis were used to assess the severity of the coronary vasculopathy. RESULTS: The incidence of coronary vasculopathy increased from 46% (17/37 patients, four of whom had stenoses > 50%) at control 1 fo 70% (26/37 patients, six of whom had stenoses > 50%) at control 2. Progression of coronary vasculopathy was diagnosed by coronary angiography in 25 patients (new abnormalities in 19 and worsening of previous abnormalities in 6). Dobutamine stress echocardiography correctly identified the progression of vasculopathy in 21 of these 25 patients (84%) with new abnormalities in 17 and worsening in four. In the four remaining patients with evidence of progression of vasculopathy on coronary angiography, the result of dobutamine stress echocardiography was abnormal in three patients and normal in only one. Therefore dobutamine stress echocardiography results were abnormal in 12 patients at control 1 (sensitivity: 65%, specificity: 95%) and in 27 at control 2 (92% sensitivity, 73% specificity). CONCLUSION: Dobutamine stress echocardiography is a sensitive, noninvasive method to diagnose the progression of allograft vasculopathy, and a negative test result is a strong predictor of absence of allograft coronary vasculopathy. Therefore serial routine coronary angiography may be deferred when dobutamine stress echocardiography results are normal.     

Usefulness of isometric hand grip exercise in detecting coronary artery disease during dobutamine atropine stress echocardiography in patients with either stable angina pectoris or another type of positive stress test

Dobutamine atropine stress echocardiography (DASE) detects coronary artery disease (CAD) by increasing myocardial oxygen demand causing ischemia. The sensitivity of the test for detection of CAD is reduced in patients with submaximal stress. We hypothesized that increasing cardiac work load by adding isometric exercise would improve the detection of ischemia during DASE. We studied 31 patients, mean age 57+/-11 years, with angiographically documented CAD. Patients underwent DASE using incremental dobutamine doses from 5 to 40 microg/kg/min, followed by atropine if peak heart rate was <85% of predicted maximal. Hand grip was then performed for 2 minutes at 33% of maximal voluntary contraction, while dobutamine infusion was maintained at the peak dose. The addition of hand grip during dobutamine stress was associated with a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (143+/-21 vs 164+/-24 mm Hg, p = 0.001) and left ventricular end-systolic circumferential wall stress (72+/-30 x 10(3) dynes/cm2 vs 132+/-34 x 10(3) dynes/cm2, p = 0.004). Wall motion score index increased from 1.0 at rest to 1.15+/-0.18 with dobutamine (p = 0.0004 vs rest), and increased further to 1.29+/-0.22 with the addition of hand grip (p = 0.004 vs dobutamine). Ischemia was detected in 19 patients (62%) with dobutamine-atropine stress alone and in 25 (83%) after the addition of hand grip (p <0.05). The addition of hand grip during DASE is feasible, and improves the detection of myocardial ischemia.     

Stress echocardiography with dobutamine. A new method for diagnosis of ischemia

Dobutamine stress echocardiography was performed in 24 patients with angiographically defined coronary artery stenosis, before they underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Ischemia was detected on stress-ECG in 13 patients. In 19 patients ischemia could be detected with dobutamine stress echocardiography. The method was highly sensitive for detecting ischemia in patients with two vessel or three vessel disease and in patients with affection of only the left anterior descending artery. In patients with one vessel disease the method showed low sensitivity. The most common side effects of dobutamine infusion were flushing and palpitations. One patient suffered atrial fibrillation and one patient had a short and self-limiting ventricular tachycardia. The method seems to be a useful and safe supplementary tool for detecting myocardial ischemia. It is also useful for characterizing the physiological effect of coronary artery stenosis.     

Comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography and treadmill exercise electrocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Critical analysis of treadmill exercise testing (TMET) for the detection of coronary artery disease has revealed many shortcomings. Excellent diagnostic accuracy has been reported for dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). METHODS: A prospective comparison of DSE and TMET for the detection of coronary artery disease in routine clinical practice was performed using contrast cineangiography (significant stenosis > or = 50%) as a gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients (82 men, 34 women) were studied. Significant stenosis was detected by coronary angiography in 92 patients (79%). Single vessel disease occurred in 28, double-vessel disease in 32, and multivessel disease in 32 patients. Although sensitivity of DSE was better than that of TMET (82 versus 40%), specificity was worse (63 versus 79%). Positive predictive values for both DSE and TMET were good at 89 and 87%, respectively, whereas negative predictive values were poor for both (47% for DSE, 26% for TMET). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, DSE performs better than TMET in terms of sensitivity and positive and negative predictive value. Its lower specificity than that of TMET may lead to more patients being referred for diagnostic coronary angiography. The poor negative predictive value of DSE and TMET means that one should not be falsely reassured by normal results.     

Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND: The analysis of wall motion abnormalities with dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) is an established method for the detection of myocardial ischemia. With ultrafast magnetic resonance tomography, identical stress protocols as used for echocardiography can be applied. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 208 consecutive patients (147 men, 61 women) with suspected coronary artery disease, DSE with harmonic imaging and dobutamine stress magnetic resonance (DSMR) (1.5 T) were performed before cardiac catheterization. DSMR images were acquired during short breath-holds in 3 short-axis views and a 4- and a 2-chamber view (gradient echo technique). Patients were examined at rest and during a standard dobutamine-atropine scheme until submaximal heart rate was reached. Regional wall motion was assessed in a 16-segment model. Significant coronary heart disease was defined as >/=50% diameter stenosis. Eighteen patients could not be examined by DSMR (claustrophobia 11 and adipositas 6) and 18 patients by DSE (poor image quality). Four patients did not reach target heart rate. In 107 patients, coronary artery disease was found. With DSMR, sensitivity was increased from 74.3% to 86.2% and specificity from 69.8% to 85.7% (both P<0.05) compared with DSE. Analysis for women yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose dobutamine magnetic resonance tomography can be performed with a standard dobutamine/atropine stress protocol. Detection of wall motion abnormalities by DSMR yields a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy in comparison to DSE.     

Nursing informatics

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the ability of on-line vectorcardiography (VCG) to detect myocardial ischaemia as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography after an episode of unstable coronary artery disease. DESIGN: Dobutamine stress test (incrementally infused doses of 5, 10, 20, 30 and 40 microg kg(-1) per minute) was performed during simultaneous VCG monitoring. QRS vector difference (QRS-VD), ST vector magnitude (ST-VM), ST change vector magnitude (STC-VM) and T change vector magnitude (TC-VM) were monitored. A new wall motion abnormality or worsening of abnormal wall motion was regarded as indicating a positive dobutamine stress test. SUBJECTS: Fifty-five patients with unstable angina pectoris and 16 patients with an acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction were studied 5-8 days after admission. RESULTS: A positive dobutamine stress test was observed in 37 patients (52%). The sensitivity, specificity and total accuracy of identifying patients with a positive dobutamine stress test by VCG were: 38%, 91% and 63% for QRS-VD; 59%, 88% and 73% for ST-VM; 84%, 79% and 82% for STC-VM; and 86%, 23% and 56% for TC-VM. Patients with a positive dobutamine stress test showed higher maximum VCG values than patients with a negative dobutamine stress test (QRS-VD, P < 0.01; ST-VM, P < 0.001; STC-VM, P < 0.001). The maximum VCG values were related to the number of segments showing new or worsening wall motion abnormality (QRS-VD: r=0.41, P < 0.001; ST-VM: r=0.44, P < 0.001; STC-VM: r=0.57, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: STC-VM and ST-VM seem to be the best VCG variables for detection of myocardial ischaemia as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography.     

Feasibility and safety of dobutamine/atropine echocardiography following acute myocardial infarct

BACKGROUND: Due to the increased utilization of this test for the evaluation of chest pain and for prognostic stratification in patients with a recent myocardial infarction, the results of 235 consecutive tests have been analyzed to evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of side effects induced by dobutamine. A potential limitation to the clinical utilization of dobutamine stress echocardiography is the higher incidence of side effects comparison with to other non invasive tests for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease reported by some authors. METHODS: Dobutamine/atropine stress echocardiography was performed in 256 patients affected by acute myocardial infarction. Dobutamine was infused starting with the dose of 5 micrograms/kg/min over 3 minutes with incremental steps of 10-20-30-40 micrograms/kg/min over 3 minutes and atropine, in cases of poor chronotropic response, under 2D-echocardiographic and 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring. RESULTS: The test was interrupted only in 4 cases for atrial fibrillation (2 patients) and symptomatic hypotension. Patients were divided according to the absence (G1) or presence (G2) of cardiac arrhythmias during the test. Patients of G2 differred from patients of G1 only in respect of the maximal dose of dobutamine infused and the incidence of a wall motion abnormality in the basal echocardiogram. CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine/atropine echo stress test may be considered a safe test for the evaluation of the presence and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with a previous or recent myocardial infarction.     

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy of the dipyridamole echocardiography test in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis for noninvasive detection of coexisting coronary artery disease. METHODS: The high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography test was performed in 52 patients with severe aortic stenosis; all patients also underwent coronary angiography, independent of test results, before cardiac operation. RESULTS: The dipyridamole echocardiography test was completed without major complications. One patient had transient atrial fibrillation that was reversed by aminophylline. Thirty-one patients (60%) had a negative test result; all had normal coronary arteries. Ten of the 21 patients (48%) with a positive test result had coexisting coronary artery disease. The positive predictive value of the dipyridamole echocardiography test for detection of coronary disease in patients with severe aortic stenosis was 48%. The negative predictive value was 100%. The sensitivity was 100% and the specificity was 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Dipyridamole echocardiography is a safe and feasible tool in patients with severe aortic stenosis eligible for a cardiac operation. A negative test result reliably rules out a significant stenosis, whereas a positive one is much less accurate in predicting coronary artery disease.     

Regional wall motion changes with dobutamine as a pharmacological stress test during cardiac catheterization in patients with significant coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: Preliminary study to test the feasibility of pharmacological stress testing during cardiac catheterization, thus combining anatomical and functional information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 21 consecutive patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, referred for diagnostic catheterization. Biplane ventriculography was performed before and during dobutamine infusion. The patients were subdivided into 3 groups: Group I (n = 11, 52%) with at least one territory supplied by a significantly stenosed coronary artery and showing normal resting regional wall motion. Group II (n = 6, 29%) patients in whom the affected vessel(s) supplied exclusively a territory with regional wall motion abnormalities at rest. Group III (n = 4, 19%) had no significant coronary artery disease and served as control. RESULTS: In group I, 9/11 (82%) patients and in group II, 3/6 (50%) patients showed either ischemia or viability reactions or both after dobutamine stress. Overall, substantial functional information was gathered in 12/17 patients (71%). Control patients showed no worsening of regional wall motion under dobutamine. Neither global left ventricular ejection fraction nor left ventricular end diastolic pressure were as accurate in detecting ischemia as regional wall motion analysis. In patients who had only ischemia and no viability reaction as judged by regional wall motion analysis, ejection fraction fell significantly in 4/6 (67%) patients; end diastolic pressure on the other hand rose significantly in 3/6 (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine stress testing performed during cardiac catheterization is convenient, feasible and safe and yields clinically useful information in a high percentage (71%) of patients with significant coronary artery disease. Further experience is needed to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of this new approach.     

Cardiac rupture with dobutamine stress echocardiography

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is a safe method for the evaluation of coronary artery disease, myocardial function, and viability. The potential for cardiac rupture exists. Although clinical and electrocardiographic criteria may be helpful in identifying those patients at risk for cardiac rupture, the criteria are neither sensitive nor specific enough to exclude patients or make recommendations regarding which patients should undergo dobutamine stress echocardiography in the post-infarction period. Physicians must be aware of the possibility and be prepared to treat cardiac rupture when performing dobutamine stress echocardiography.     

Noninvasive diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis in women with limited exercise capacity: comparison of dobutamine stress echocardiography and 99mTc sestamibi single-photon emission CT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) and simultaneous 99mTc sestamibi (MIBI) single-photon emission CT (SPECT) imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis in women. PATIENTS: Seventy women with limited exercise capacity referred for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: DSE (up to 40 microg/kg/min) was performed in conjunction with stress MIBI SPECT. Resting MIBI images were acquired 24 h after the stress test. Ischemia was defined as new or worsened wall motion abnormalities confirmed by DSE and as reversible perfusion defects confirmed by MIBI. Significant coronary artery disease was defined as > or = 50% luminal diameter stenosis. RESULTS: DSE was positive for ischemia in 35 of 45 patients with coronary artery stenosis and in 2 of 25 patients without coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity = 78% CI, 68 to 88; specificity = 92% CI, 85 to 99; and accuracy = 83% CI, 74 to 92). A positive MIBI study for ischemia occurred in 29 patients with coronary artery stenosis and in 7 patients without coronary artery stenosis (sensitivity = 64% CI, 53 to 76; specificity = 72% CI, 61 to 83; and accuracy = 67% CI, 56 to 78 [p < 0.05 vs DSE]). In the 59 vascular regions with coronary artery stenosis, the regional sensitivity of DSE was higher than MIBI (69% CI, 62 to 77 vs 51% CI, 42 to 59, p < 0.05), whereas specificity in the 81 vascular regions without significant stenosis was similar (89% CI, 84 to 94 vs 88% CI, 82 to 93, respectively). CONCLUSION: DSE is a useful noninvasive method for the diagnosis of coronary artery stenosis in women and provides a higher overall and regional diagnostic accuracy than dobutamine MIBI SPECT in this particular population.     

Evaluation of patients with diabetes mellitus for coronary artery disease using dobutamine stress echocardiography

BACKGROUND: There is a high prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with diabetes mellitus. Detection of inducible ischaemia using treadmill exercise testing may be limited by the relatively poor inherent predictive accuracy of the test. The purpose of this study was to determine the value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) for the detection of CAD in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Patients with diabetes mellitus referred for cardiac assessment were considered eligible for study. DSE was performed in a standard fashion. Significant CAD was defined as a > 50% luminal diameter stenosis on coronary angiography. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients (mean age 59 years) with diabetes mellitus were studied prospectively using DSE. Risk factors for CAD included hypertension in 19, family history in 21, hypercholesterolaemia in 14, history of smoking in 38. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of DSE for detection of CAD were 82, 54, 84 and 50% respectively. CONCLUSION: The specificity of DSE for CAD in patients with diabetes mellitus is low. Whether this reflects an underdetection of small vessel disease by contrast coronary angiography or whether it relates to test performance is unclear.