Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost

OBJECTIVE: To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias. SETTING: Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996. SUBJECTS: 400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group. Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs. RESULTS: More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (chi2 = 6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was 335 pounds (95% confidence interval 228 pounds to 441 pounds) more than the cost of open repair. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive.     

A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open). METHODS: A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group 1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences. RESULTS: The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open. CONCLUSIONS: TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically reduced.     

Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Early results

BACKGROUND: In February 1993 a prospective randomized multicenter trial was initiated to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty to Shouldice herniorrhaphy as performed by surgeons of nonspecialized clinics. METHODS: Until January 1994, 87 patients with 108 hernias took part in the trial (43 Shouldice and 44 laparoscopic repairs). RESULTS: The laparoscopic procedure took significantly longer than did the open operation but caused less pain as measured by pain analogue score and consumption of paracetamol and narcotics. The postoperative complication rate was 26% in the open and 16% in the laparoscopic group. The patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged earlier and their convalescence was shorter than after open hernia repair. There has been one early recurrence in the laparoscopic and two in the open group to date with a mean follow-up of 201 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernia repair causes less pain than the conventional operation and enables the patient to return to full work and usual activities earlier. The recurrence rate will not be known for 5 years.     

Mesh inguinal herniorrhaphy: a ten-year review

Inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common surgical operations, with approximately 10 to 20 per cent performed for recurrence. Reviews by specialized hernia centers show mesh repair has a recurrence rate of 0.2 per cent. Detractors of this repair include increased cost, technical difficulty, and risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare mesh versus nonmesh inguinal herniorrhaphy at a large teaching institution. From 1985 to 1994, 892 patients underwent primary repair for inguinal hernia at the Veterans Administration Hospital at Memphis, TN. Patients were stratified by repair [Lichtenstein (Mesh), open anterior (Bassini, Marcy, McVay, and Shouldice), laparoscopic (Lap), and preperitoneal (Post)]. Operative time for Mesh repair (111 +/- 2 minutes) was longer than for Bassini or McVay (91 +/- 2 and 98 +/- 2 minutes; P < 0.05), and Lap repairs were longer than all others (192 +/- 16 minutes; P < 0.05). Hospital stay averaged 2.2 +/- 0.1 days for Mesh versus 2.6 +/- 0.1 days for all repairs combined (P = not significant). Mesh patients developed four wound infections (1.0%), none requiring mesh removal, versus nine infections (1.8%) in other groups (P = not significant). One Mesh patient (0.3%) developed recurrence, compared with 16 (3.5%) with open anterior repair (P < 0.01). Inguinal herniorrhaphy using an open mesh repair technique provides superior recurrence rates without increasing risk for infection, length of stay, or technical difficulty.     

Laparoscopic repair and groin hernia surgery

Over the past 15 years, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy has made the transition from an experimental to a proven procedure. With increasing laparoscopic skills in the surgical community, many surgeons are now faced with the question of when to recommend laparoscopic herniorrhaphy to their patients. A surgeon's best hernia repair is the one with which they have had the greatest experience. This results in the lowest recurrence and complication rate in his or her hands. Certainly, simple, unilateral hernias and bilateral hernias can be repaired with either anterior or laparoscopic techniques. Many times, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is too much surgery for a young patient with a unilateral hernia. In such a case, repair is best performed with the patient under local anesthesia. Also, young patients in whom it is advantageous to avoid mesh should not undergo laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. The authors prefer laparoscopic TEP herniorrhaphy in patients with recurrent hernias, bilateral hernias, and unilateral hernias with a suspected contralateral hernia. There is also a consensus that patients with multiple recurrent hernias in whom a preperitoneal repair is appropriate are best served with a laparoscopic repair. Surgeons without advanced laparoscopic skills or without the time to develop the skills necessary to perform laparoscopic herniorrhaphy should consider referring patients with recurrent hernias to surgeons with experience in TEP. TEP is preferable to TAPP because of its lower complication and recurrence rates and in the authors' hands is the "best repair." TAPP should be reserved for patients with prior lower abdominal wall incisions that make the dissection of the peritoneum from the underside of the incision impossible. Patients who cannot tolerate general anesthesia or who have had extensive lower abdominal surgery should not undergo laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Complication and recurrence rates, although initially higher than traditional repairs, have now fallen to equal or lower levels at centers experienced in laparoscopic techniques. Prospective randomized trials prove that when patients are selected properly and surgeons are adequately trained and proctored, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy can be performed with acceptably low incidences of recurrence and complications.     

Day-case laparoscopic hernia repair

Some 114 patients (median age 52 years) underwent laparoscopic hernia repair as a day-case procedure. Twenty-one patients had bilateral and 11 recurrent hernias. Some 113 patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair but one required conversion to open operation. Mean operating time was 24 min for unilateral and 38 min for bilateral repair. In an operating session of 3.5 h, up to five patients (mean 4.4) underwent surgery and as many as seven hernias were repaired. More than 10 per cent of patients were found to have a previously undiagnosed hernia on the opposite side. A total of 111 patients were discharged home on the day of surgery. Major complications included one omental bleed and one small bowel obstruction. Seroma was the commonest minor complication and occurred in 7 per cent of patients. More than 35 per cent of patients needed no postoperative analgesia. To date there has been one recurrence (follow-up range 2-18 months).     

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: the new gold standard of hernia repair?

The surgical treatment of the common inguinal hernia has been one of the most analyzed and debated topics in medicine. Recently, with the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques has led to it's application for inguinal hernia repair. Current laparoscopic herniorrhaphies are based on the principles of conventional open preperitoneal repairs and are classified into two types: 1) transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and 2) totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Common advantages to both techniques include a decrease in postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activity, and improved cosmesis. Both laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantage of requiring general or regional anesthesia and increased procedural costs. Lastly, there is a concern that laparoscopic hernia repair has not been around long enough to know the risk of late recurrences. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, however, is a viable alternative to standard open inguinal hernia repair.     

The effect of Gynostemma pentaphyllum mak (GP) on carcinogenesis of the golden hamster cheek pouch induced by DMBA]

AIM: of this study is to compare two similar groups presenting inguinal herniae, one group having laparoscopic herniography and the other having a Bassini or Fruchaud repair. METHOD: Since September 1994, in our department, patients presenting with symptoms of unilateral or bilateral inguinal herniae to our practice were offered the transperitoneal or preperitoneal approach as an alternative of open surgical repair. We considered the first 50 patients operated by laparoscopic technic (35 M and 15 F), age between 22-72 years (group A), and similar group operated by Bassini or Fruchaud technic (group B). All the patients had general anesthesia and perioperative antibiotics. In the group A we used Prolene, Mercilene or Plastex mesh. The following parameters were assessed: 1) operative time from incision to closure: 2) amount and type of analgesia required postoperatively; 3) morbidity related to the procedure; 4) interval before returning to full activity; 5) early recurrence rate; 6) hospital cost. RESULTS: The mean operative time for unilateral herniae in group A was 70 +/- 10 minutes versus 40 +/- 12 minutes in group B. Group A required to return to work was significantly shorter for the patients in group A (7 +/- 3 days) compared with group B patients (25 +/- 10 days). Although no recurrent herniae have yet been found in patients from either group; follow-up was only 2-18 months in the two groups. The cost of hospital care of group A patients exceeded that of group B by approximately 1.7 more. IN CONCLUSION: was consider that although is more expensive, the laparoscopic procedure in treatment of inguinal herniae, has more benefits for the patients.     

Three thousand one hundred seventy-five primary inguinal hernia repairs: advantages of ambulatory open mesh repair using local anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists over the relative advantages of open mesh repair compared with open stitching methods and the laparoscopic approach. STUDY DESIGN: Two thousand nine hundred six (2,906) consecutive unselected adult patients underwent 3,175 primary inguinal hernia repairs using polypropylene mesh, under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis. The age range was 15-92 years. The study specifically investigated the postoperative course with regard to pain, complications, and time of return to work. RESULTS: There were no postoperative deaths and no cases of urinary retention. Two percent of patients developed a hematoma. The incidence of deep infection was 0.3%. No case of testicular atrophy occurred. Postoperatively 19% of patients used no analgesia at all; 60% used oral analgesics for up to 7 days. There was a gradual decrease in time of return to work over four successive 1-year periods. Manual workers returned to work in 15 days (median) in the first year, reducing to 9 days in the fourth year. The overall median time of return to work across the whole group was 9 days. There were eight recurrences with an 18-month to 5-year followup. CONCLUSIONS: Open mesh repair under local anesthesia is an effective day case technique, particularly in the elderly and medically unfit. The economic benefits are enhanced by low morbidity, early return to normal activities and low recurrence rates.     

Femoral venous flow dynamics during intraperitoneal and preperitoneal laparoscopic insufflation

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy may be performed using an intraperitoneal or a preperitoneal approach. Anecdotal and experimental evidence indicates that alterations in lower extremity venous flow, which occur during intraperitoneal laparoscopic insufflation, may be associated with an increased risk of deep vein thrombosis. However, no study has directly compared femoral venous flow during intraperitoneal insufflation with that during preperitoneal insufflation. METHOD: In eight consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic herniorrhaphy under general anesthesia, flow through the common femoral vein was evaluated with B-mode and color flow duplex. Pre- and intraperitoneal pressures were standardized to 10 mm Hg, and respiratory tidal volumes were standardized to 10 cc/kg. Flow measurements were taken at end expiration. Flow through the common femoral vein was measured after induction of anesthesia, during intraperitoneal insufflation, during preperitoneal insufflation, and between insufflations to ensure return to baseline. RESULTS: All patients in the study were males. Their mean age was 59 years. Mean flow in the common femoral vein was essentially identical at baseline (138 ml/min) and during preperitoneal insufflation (135 ml/min). Alternatively, mean flow in the common femoral vein was significantly reduced during intraperitoneal insufflation (65 ml/min, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Flow in the common femoral vein is significantly reduced during intraperitoneal insufflation. However, flow in the common femoral vein is not affected by preperitoneal insufflation. These data suggest that laparoscopic preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair may pose as less a risk of thromboembolic complications than laparoscopic intraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.     

Thyrotoxicosis presenting as a life threatening hypokalaemic paralysis: investigation of the Na/K pump in isolated leucocytes

Laparoscopic femoral herniorrhaphy using a preperitoneal plug and patch appears to be a feasible laparoscopic approach to femoral hernia. A modified preperitoneal femoral hernia repair with mesh and resection of incarcerated small bowel has been successfully completed under laparoscopic guidance in a 64-year-old patient with incarcerated femoral hernia. To our knowledge, this is the first such case reported in the United States. With further experience, laparoscopic femoral herniorrhaphy could provide a viable alternative to the standard treatment of femoral hernia.     

Double-gracilis anorectal neosphincter: technique of reconstruction after necrosis of the distal part of the muscles

BACKGROUND: The Lichtenstein tension-free repair has become the standard method for repairing inguinal hernia in many surgical units. This study compared two methods of mesh fixation. METHODS: Fifty men undergoing unilateral primary Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups. In the control group polypropylene mesh was secured with 2/0 polypropylene sutures and the skin closed with subcuticular 3/0 polydioxanone. In the study group polypropylene mesh was secured with skin staples and the skin was closed with staples from the same staple gun. Duration of the operation was recorded. Early follow-up was achieved by patient review at 6 weeks and postal questionnaire at 12 weeks. RESULTS: The operation was significantly shorter when staples were used (median 20 min 0 s versus 29 min 30 s, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications or pain score. The study group reported earlier return to normal activity (4 weeks 0 days versus 6 weeks 2 days, P < 0.01) although there was no difference in the time taken to return to work or driving. CONCLUSION: The use of skin staples to secure mesh in the Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair significantly reduced the duration of the operation and was as effective as conventional mesh fixation with polypropylene in the short term.     

Recurrent inguinal hernia: preferred operative approach

Inguinal herniorrhaphy remains one of the most common general surgical operations, with approximately 10 to 20 per cent performed for recurrence. Subsequent repairs provide considerable technical challenge, as well as substantially greater risk of developing further recurrence. Mesh repair is advocated by several specialized hernia centers, demonstrating re-recurrence rates less than 2 per cent. Detractors of this repair include cost, technical difficulty, and risk for infection. The purpose of this study was to compare results of mesh and nonmesh repairs for recurrent inguinal hernia, either using an anterior or posterior approach, at a large teaching institution. From January 1, 1985, to December 31, 1994, 146 patients underwent repair for recurrent inguinal hernia at the Veterans Administration Hospital at Memphis, Tennessee. Patients were stratified by type of repair: Lichtenstein (Mesh), open anterior (OA), Bassini, Marcy, McVay, Shouldice, and preperitoneal with or without mesh. Patient ages and weights were similar between groups. Mean operative time for Mesh repair (104 +/- 4 minutes) was longer than that for OA repairs (80 +/- 5 minutes, P < 0.05) or preperitoneal without mesh repairs (92 +/- 5 minutes, P < 0.05). Mesh-based posterior repairs had the longest operative times (116 +/- 5 minutes). Hospital stay averaged 2.8 +/- 0.3 days, similar among all groups. One wound infection (1.0%) occurred in patients undergoing Mesh repair, which required operative drainage. No patient required removal of mesh. Two patients in the Mesh group (5.9%) developed recurrence compared with four recurrences (18.0%) in patients undergoing OA repairs. Only one patient with a mesh-based posterior repair recurred (1.9%) compared to eight without mesh (21.6%, P < 0.01). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 12 years. Repair of recurrent inguinal hernia using either an anterior or posterior mesh repair technique, performed at a teaching facility, provides superior recurrence rates without increasing risk for infection or length of stay. Preperitoneal mesh based repair is the preferred technique.     

Cephalosporin vs penicillin

Smaller individual series on the outcome of laparoscopic hernioplasty techniques have been reported. This study reports on the complications of 3,229 laparoscopic hernia repairs performed by the authors in 2,559 patients. The TAPP (transabdominal preperitoneal) technique was the most frequently performed: 1,944 (60%). The totally preperitoneal technique was performed 578 (18%) times. The IPOM (intraperitoneal onlay mesh) repair was performed 345 (11%) times. The plug-and-patch technique was used 286 (9%) times and simple closure of the hernia defect without mesh was used in 76 (2%) repairs. Overall, there were 336 (10%) complications: 17 (0.5%) major and 265 (8%) minor. There were 54 (1.6%) recurrences, with a mean follow-up of 22 months. The TAPP technique had 19 (1%) recurrences and 141 (7%) complications. There were four bowel obstructions in this subgroup from herniation of small bowel through the peritoneal closure and trocar sites. The totally preperitoneal technique had no recurrence and 60 (10%) complications. The IPOM group had 7 (2%) recurrences and 47 (14%) complications. The plug-and-patch technique had 26 (9%) recurrences and 24 (8%) complications. The simple closure of the internal ring had 2 (3%) recurrences and 10 (13%) complications. Laparoscopic hernioplasty is not without complications. Laparoscopic hernioplasty is not without complications. Training, experience, and attention to technique will prevent some of these complications.     

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. A preperitoneal tension-free approach

At the present time laparoscopic herniorrhaphy appears to be successfully performed by utilizing a preperitoneal approach. The major indications are bilaterals hernia and the recurrent hernia. Other routine hernias may be done at the decision of the surgeon and patient depending upon the necessity of rapid return to work and desire to minimize pain. Utilizing this approach, the recurrence rate at the present time is less than 1%, which compares favorably with all other types of repair.     

Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernias can be repaired by laparoscopic techniques, which have had better results than open surgery in several small studies. METHODS: We performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernias were treated by extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior repair. We recorded information about postoperative recovery and complications and examined the patients for recurrences one and six weeks, six months, and one and two years after surgery. RESULTS: Six patients in the open-surgery group but none in the laparoscopic-surgery group had wound abscesses (P=0.03), and the patients in the laparoscopic-surgery group had a more rapid recovery (median time to the resumption of normal daily activity, 6 vs. 10 days; time to the return to work, 14 vs. 21 days; and time to the resumption of athletic activities, 24 vs. 36 days; P<0.001 for all comparisons). With a median follow-up of 607 days, 31 patients (6 percent) in the open-surgery group had recurrences, as compared with 17 patients (3 percent) in the laparoscopic-surgery group (P=0.05). All but three of the recurrences in the latter group were within one year after surgery and were caused by surgeon-related errors. In the open-surgery group, 15 patients had recurrences during the first year, and 16 during the second year. Follow-up was complete for 97 percent of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with inguinal hernias who undergo laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly and have fewer recurrences than those who undergo open surgical repair.     

Controlled trial of preperitoneal local anaesthetic for reducing pain following laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized trial was performed to determine whether local anaesthetic solutions injected into the preperitoneal space may provide additional pain relief following transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair were allocated randomly to receive (1) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg, (2) bupivacaine 1.5 mg/kg with 1 in 200000 adrenaline, (3) bupivacaine 3 mg/kg or (4) saline instilled into the preperitoneal space at the end of the operation. An independent clinical assessor determined the level of pain using a visual analogue pain score and noted the parenteral and oral analgesia requirements at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after operation. Results: At each of the time intervals, there was no significant difference between the groups for pain scores (at 24 h, P = 0.71) or the number of doses of either morphine (at 24 h, P = 0.73) or oral analgesia (at 24 h, P = 0.89). There was also no significant difference in the time to return to normal activity or work between the groups. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that instilling local anaesthetic into the preperitoneal space has no significant effect on postoperative pain relief requirement following laparoscopic hernia repair. Other methods of reducing postoperative pain should be sought that may facilitate day-case laparoscopic hernia surgery.     

Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one year follow up

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcome and costs between laparoscopic and open hernia repair. DESIGN: Prospective randomised study. SETTING: One university and two district hospitals in Sweden. SUBJECTS: 200 men aged 25-75 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, hospital stay, complications, and time to recovery. A cost-minimisation-analysis was used in which the total costs were calculated for a defined period of time for each option. RESULT: The one year follow-up rate was 98%. Mean (SD) operation times in the laparoscopic and open groups were 72 (30) and 62 (25) minutes, respectively (p = 0.009). Hospital stay and complication rates did not differ between the groups. Among employees the mean (SD) periods off work in the laparoscopic and open groups were 10 (8) and 23 (21) days, respectively (p = 0.0001). The mean direct costs of the laparoscopic operation were increased by SEK 4037 (US$ 483) but the savings in indirect costs resulting from earlier return to work were SEK 11392 (US$ 1364). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernia repair gave the employed patients faster recovery and return to work, and was the most cost-effective strategy provided that both direct and indirect costs were included.     

The nuclear scaffold structures and plasmid DNA replication in the cells of higher eukaryotes]

In a prospective randomized trial comparing the totally preperitoneal (TPP) laparoscopic approach and the Stoppa procedure (open), 100 patients with inguinal hernias (Nyhus IIIA, IIIB, IV) were followed over a 3-year period. Both groups were epidemiologically comparable. In the laparoscopic group, operating time was significantly longer (p = 0.01), but hospital stay (3.2 vs. 7.3 days) and delay in return to work (17 vs. 35 days) were significantly reduced (p = 0.01). Postoperative comfort (less pain) was better (p = 0.001) after laparoscopy. In this group, morbidity was also reduced (4 vs. 20%; p = 0.02). The mean follow-up was 605 days, and 93% of the patients were reviewed at 3 years. There were three (6%) recurrences after TPP, especially at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve, versus one for the Stoppa procedure (NS). For bilateral hernias, the authors suggest the use of a large prosthesis rather than two small ones to minimize the likelihood of recurrence. In the conditions described, the laparoscopic (TPP) approach to inguinal hernia treatment appears to have the same long-term recurrence rate as the open (Stoppa) procedure but a real advantage in the early postoperative period.     

Risks and benefits of laparoscopic hernia-plasty (TAPP). 5 years experiences with 3,400 hernia repairs

In the present study, for the first time the aspects of risk, benefit and the costs of laparoscopic hernioplasty in the transabdominal technique with preperitoneal placement of a polypropylene mesh are examined prospectively in a very large group of patients with 3,400 hernia repairs. The median operation time was 45 min for unilateral primary hernias, 50 min for unilateral recurrent hernias and 76 min for bilateral hernias. The frequency of complications showed a significant dependence on the individual steps in the development of the method and the individual learning curve. The same is true for the rate of recurrency. Whereas initially the rate of serious complications was 2.75%, the rate of minor complications 11% and the rate of recurrences 4.5% the corresponding figures are at present 0.4%, 4.4% and 0.5%. Laparoscopic hernioplasty proved to be equally as effective in the treatment of primary hernias, recurrent hernias and bilateral hernias. The large number of 11 surgeons participating proves that laparoscopic hernioplasty can be learned and that even in a teaching hospital it can be performed safely, efficiently and cost-effectively.