Preoperative diagnosis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Is there an indication for routine intravenous cholangiography?

In a retrospective study including 163 patients we investigated the necessity of i.v. cholangiography in preoperative routine diagnostic workup prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We evaluated the evidence of i.v. cholangiography concerning the anatomy of the biliary system, the evidence of common bile duct or cystic duct stones and the influence on the further therapeutic procedure. While the common bile duct could be demonstrated in 96.3%, the cystic duct could be visualized in only 54.6%. One out of two patients with a short cystic duct was identified. Stones in the gallbladder were recognized in 72.4% of cases, while only two out of three patients with common bile duct stones were diagnosed. In nine cases a deep junction of the cystic duct was found, but there was no influence on further operative procedure. Thus we found no improvement after routine use of i.v. cholangiography concerning the evidence of common bile duct stones or avoidance of intraoperative lesions of the common bile duct. The routine use of i.v. cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy is therefore not justified.     

Laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound. An alternative to cholangiography?

The purpose of this study was to compare laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound (LICU) examination of the biliary duct system with cholangiography for delineation of duct anatomy and determination of presence or absence of ductal calculi. Thirty-one patients had LICU examination of the extrahepatic bile ducts after exposure of the gallbladder but prior to dissection of the cystic duct. After LICU examination, cystic duct dissection and cholangiography were done. Evaluation of duct anatomy and decision for duct exploration were based on findings of both tests. All patients had successful LICU examination and 30 had successful cholangiography. Duct size as determined by LICU corresponded precisely with cholangiography. LICU provided useful anatomical information in two patients with aberrant anatomy and detected cholangiogram. LICU aids in delineation of biliary duct anatomy and accurately determines presence or absence of duct calculi.     

Laparoscopic intracorporeal ultrasound cystic duct length measurement: a new technique to prevent common bile duct injuries

The incidence of common bile duct injury remains high. Intracorporeal ultrasound mapping of cystic duct anatomy, prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), may assist surgeons in avoiding common bile duct injuries. A technique for intraoperative intracorporeal predissection ultrasound imaging (IIPUI) of the cystic duct length was tested. During LC, gallbladder adhesions were lysed, and with the gallbladder retracted by grasping forceps, the ultrasound examination was performed. Using a 7.5-MHz articulating ultrasound probe, visualization of the extrahepatic biliary tree was obtained in five separate planes. Success in visualizing each plane, time for ultrasound examination, and predissection accuracy of cystic duct length measurement were recorded. Intraoperative cholangiography or direct measurement of the dissected cystic duct was used to determine accuracy of the ultrasound cystic duct length estimates. Forty-three patients underwent IIPUI during LC. The time required to perform the examination varied, with a range of 5 to 17 min (mean 9.5 min). Success of visualization in planes 1 through 5 was 44%, 95%, 98%, 98%, and 70%, respectively. The accuracy rate for cystic duct length ultrasound measurement was 87.1%. No complications related to the examination were observed. In this preliminary study, cystic duct length was determined by predissection intracorporeal ultrasound with a high level of accuracy. Predissection imaging may assist in preventing common bile duct injury during LC.     

Routine intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography

BACKGROUND: Whether intraoperative laparoscopic cholangiography should be routine is debatable. METHODS: We reviewed the cholangiography experience in 669 consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomies. RESULTS: Mean age of the patients was 39 years, 78% were female, and 29% had acute cholecystitis. Cholecystectomy was completed laparoscopically in 606 (91%). Laparoscopic cholangiography was completed in 562 (93%) and 348 (62%) were routine (no preoperative indication). The mean operating time in 1996 was 61 minutes. Out of the 348 routine cholangiograms, 17 demonstrated evidence of unsuspected choledocholithiasis. Five patients had choledocholithiasis documented by laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Two patients had normal postoperative cholangiopancreatography. One of 10 patients managed expectantly was readmitted postoperatively with obstructive jaundice. In 4 patients, routine cholangiography revealed unexpected anatomy, and in 2, this prevented misidentification and transection of the common bile duct. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic cholangiography is safe, quick, detects unsuspected choledocholithiasis, and can prevent common bile duct transection. It should be routine.     

Control of the temporal aspect when considering risk factors for acute otitis media

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, initially performed in France in 1987, has rapidly spread to other European countries, the United States, and elsewhere. Of the techniques that have evolved, the "French" technique, in which the surgeon stands between the patient's legs, and the "American" technique, in which the surgeon stands on the patient's left side, are the most commonly used. In the former technique, the liver is retracted via the mid-clavicular cannula and the infundibulum of the gallbladder via the anterior axillary port. In the latter technique, the liver is retracted by axial traction on the gallbladder through the anterior axillary cannula and the infundibulum through the mid-clavicular cannula. This position may increase the risk of bile duct injury. The technique selected for operative cholangiography should be adapted to the problem at hand. Cystic duct cholangiography shows ductal calculi more reliably due to better filling of the common bile duct; direct puncture of the gallbladder is safer when the biliary anatomy is unclear. A number of European studies confirm the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mortality rates vary between 0% and 0.1%, and duct injury rates range between 0.2% and 0.6%. Conversion, which is done in 3% to 8% of cases, may be necessary in the case of uncontrollable hemorrhage, bile duct injury unsuitable for laparoscopic repair, or if the gallbladder is densely scarred (scleroatrophic). It can also be done for safety reasons, when the anatomy is unclear. Complications include bile collections due to accessory duct or cystic duct stump leaks or less commonly to common duct injury. The average postoperative stay is longer in Europe (3.2 days) than in the United States. A decision tree is presented for the management of common bile duct stones. In general, preoperatively identified ductal stones are removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy, which is then followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy to remove the source of the calculi. The techniques of laparoscopic choledochotomy and transcystic exploration for the removal of stones in the common bile duct are only beginning to be used, but they may well prove to be the most popular procedures. Results with these procedures will need to be evaluated against those obtained with endoscopic sphincterotomy.     

Comparison of laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography in 300 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND: This study compares laparoscopic ultrasonography to fluorocholangiography in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones and delineating biliary anatomy. METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized study of 300 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a university hospital was performed. After port placement but before dissection, laparoscopic ultrasonography of the extrahepatic CBD was performed in both transverse and longitudinal planes. Cystic duct fluorocholangiography was attempted in all patients. RESULTS: Of 300 patients, CBD stones were detected in 26 (9%) with 25 of these (96%) detected on laparoscopic ultrasonography. Sonography identified the location and size of the CBD as well as anomalous anatomy prior to dissection. No CBD injuries were encountered. End-fire transducers were easier to use than rigid or flexible side-fire transducers; all gave excellent image quality. CONCLUSIONS: In this large study, laparoscopic ultrasonography and fluorocholangiography were equally sensitive in detecting CBD stones. Sonography delineates the biliary anatomy noninvasively and does not require dissection or opening of the biliary system. Laparoscopic ultrasonography may improve the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, especially in cases of acute inflammation or distorted anatomy.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones. At present, no consensus has been reached on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of concomitant common bile duct stones. Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy during the same anesthetic procedure could be a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent a prospective endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Fourty-four patients (35%) had at least one predictive factor for common bile duct stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy were performed on the same day. Endoscopic ultrasonography was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy by the same endoscopist in case of common bile duct stones on endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were routinely followed up between 3 and 6 months and one year after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested common bile duct stones in 21 patients (17%). Endoscopic ultrasonography identified a stone in 17 of 44 patients (38.6%) with predictor of common bile duct stones and only in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) without predictor of common bile duct stone. Among these 21 patients, one patient was not investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because of the high risk of sphincterotomy, 19 patients had a stone removed after sphincterotomy, one patient had no visible stone neither on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, nor on exploration of the common bile duct after sphincterotomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in 104 patients (83%). However, two patients in this group were investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because endoscopic ultrasonography was incomplete in one case and because endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in the second case but a stone in the left hepatic duct was detected by ultrasonography. A stone was removed after endoscopic sphincterotomy in these two patients. In the group of 102 patients without stone, 91 out of 92, continued to be asymptomatic during a median follow-up of 8.5 months. One patient with symptoms one month after cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy but no stone was found. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy is a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct for all patients. This alternative is only justifiable in patients with predictor of common bile duct stones.     

Bile leakage resulting from clip displacement of the cystic duct stump: a potential pitfall of laparoscopic cholecystectomy

We present the case of a patient who underwent successful endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for bile leakage resulting from clip displacement of the cystic duct stump sustained during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). This 69-year-old man was admitted with symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. After LC was performed, intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) revealed no abnormal findings. However, postoperatively, bilious material began to appear from the intraabdominal drain. Subsequent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) showed bile leakage from the end of the cystic duct stump. ENBD was performed. Cholangiography using the ENBD tube 14 days later failed to show a bile leak. The ENBD was subsequently removed. The patient improved rapidly with no complaints. Bile leakage due to clip displacement from the cystic duct stump is a potential pitfall of LC, especially if IOC is normal. We recommend careful cystic duct ligation, combined with the use of superior quality ligation clips, to prevent this complication. ENBD is a useful technique to prevent bile leakage after this complication.     

Value of intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

By introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, an increase of accidental common bile duct injuries up to 1.2% has been reported. In the present study of 325 cholecystectomies we evaluated whether mandatory intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) can reduce the rate of accidental bile duct injuries or, at least, identify them early in order to make an adequate repair possible. In addition 163 patients underwent preoperative intravenous cholangiography (IVC). Both imaging techniques were compared with regard to their sensitivity in the detection of anatomic variations and stones of the extrahepatic bile duct system. Our results demonstrated a great advantage of the IOC. The IOC was feasible in 98.1% of the cases and presented a complete depiction of the extrahepatic bile duct system in 99.3%. IVCs showed the biliary system in 91.4% of the cases but without visualization of the cystic duct in 51.5% and the hepatic confluence in 16%. Anatomic variations of the bile duct system which consecutively influenced the operative management were found in additional 27.6% exclusively by IOC. 71.4% of bile duct stones were not detected by IVC. The intraoperative time consumption of IOC was unimportant. The x-ray-load was clearly lower by a factor of 3.5. There was no complication after IOC. In comparison, 6.1% of patients demonstrated an anaphylactic reaction by IVC. One common duct injury (0.3%) was detected intraoperatively by IOC and at the same operation treated without postoperative complications. In conclusion, we recommend an IOC in addition to a thorough preoperative ultrasound-examination. By this technique intraoperatively identified stones of the common bile duct can be sufficiently treated by postoperative endoscopic extraction and anatomic variations of the bile duct system will be visualized and therefore accidental injuries will be avoided.     

Psychopathology as adaptive development along distinctive pathways

The vast majority of post-operative bile duct strictures occur following cholecystectomy, these injuries having been seen at an increased frequency since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Bile duct injuries usually present early in the post-operative period, obstructive jaundice or evidence of a bile leak being the most common mode of presentation. In patients presenting with a post-operative bile duct stricture months to years after surgery, cholangitis is the most common symptom. The 'gold standard' for the diagnosis of bile duct strictures is cholangiography. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is generally more valuable than endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in that it defines the anatomy of the proximal biliary tree that is to be used in surgical reconstruction. The most commonly employed surgical procedure with the best overall results for the treatment of bile duct stricture is a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The results of the surgical repair of bile duct strictures are excellent, long-term success rates being in excess of 80% in most series. Recent data have suggested that, at intermediate follow-up of approximately 3 years, an excellent outcome can be obtained following repair of bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Percutaneous and endoscopic techniques for the dilatation of bile duct strictures can be useful adjuncts to the management of bile duct strictures if the anatomical situation and clinical scenario favour this approach. In selected patients, the results of both endoscopic and percutaneous dilatation are comparable to those of surgical reconstruction.     

In vitro activity and clinical evaluation of cefixime in urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND: The management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in the era of operative laparoscopy is evolving. Several minimally invasive techniques to remove CBDS have been described, including preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), postoperative ERCP, lithotripsy, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration, and laparoscopic choledochotomy with common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Because of the risks and limitations of these procedures, we utilize laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents as an adjunct to CBDE. METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) by either choledochotomy or the transcystic technique with placement of endobiliary stents. These patients were identified during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as having occult choledocholithiasis, using routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: CBDS were successfully removed in all patients as demonstrated by completion cholangiography and intraoperative choledochoscopy. Eighty percent of patients were discharged the following day; the first three patients in this series were observed for 48 h prior to discharge. No patient required T-tube placement and closed suction drains were removed the morning after surgery. Stents were removed endoscopically at 1 month. Six- to 30-month follow-up demonstrates no complications to date. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting reduces operative morbidity, eliminates the complications of T-tubes, and allows patients to return to unrestricted activity quickly. We recommend laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents in patients undergoing LCBDE.     

Routine intraoperative cholangiography and its contribution to the selective cholangiographer

Routine intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy is controversial. In order to address this debate, we asked the following questions: What intraoperative information is provided to the surgeon? What IOC criteria or standards are necessary to observe this information? Between 1990 and 1993, 624 laparoscopic cholangiography (LC) cases were performed at Virginia Mason Hospital, during which 86% (535) of the patients underwent successfully performed IOCs. Each of these cholangiograms was sought, and 420 (78%) were reviewed by a radiologist and a surgeon. Specific items involved the presence or absence of filling defects, bile duct diameter, contrast leaks, flow into the duodenum, benign or malignant stricture, contrast in a portion of the pancreatic duct, and anomalous ducts. "Relevant findings" were defined as filling defects, stricture, leaks, and the following anomalous ducts: a bile duct from the right side of the liver entering near or into the cystic duct. The entire biliary tree was visualized in 86%, and the bifurcation was seen in 95% of the cases. Considering these deficiencies, we found a 10% incidence of filling defects. Anomalies were common in the biliary tree (39%), and knowledge of the presence of some of them are important for safe dissection (at least 4%). Also, at least 68 relevant findings would have been missed in 420 LC cases without IOC. If the IOC had not visualized the biliary tree proximal to the cystic duct, 30 of 68 or 44% of these findings would not have been observed. If an IOC is performed on a routine or selective basis, the study should visualize the entire biliary tree.     

The case for routine operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The debate over routine versus selective intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy continues because of a paucity of objective data to support or refute the case for either approach. The introduction of fluoroscopic techniques during the performance of cholangiography is an important step forward because it decreases the operative time for the technique and because real-time visualization may also diminish the number of false-positive and false-negative results. Routine cholangiography improves the surgeon's ability to delineate the biliary anatomy when the need arises and undoubtedly facilitates the development of skills useful for the laparoscopic management of common bile duct calculi. Normal results on intraoperative cholangiography are also reassuring to the surgeon, given the current visual and tactile limitations of laparoscopy. As a result of these considerations as well as our procurement of a digital fluoroscopic system and the need to train surgical residents in cholangiographic techniques, we have adopted a policy of routine fluoroscopic intraoperative cholangiography on all patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Obligatory intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Despite growing experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy in up to now 1100 operations lesions of the bile ducts sometimes occur. We therefore decided to perform intraoperative cholangiography obligatorily and increased our rate of intraoperative X-ray control from 30% in the first 500 operations to 98.2% in the last 500 operations. The mean operation time in the radiography group was 44.8 min. After introduction of intraoperative cholangiography no bile duct lesions were encountered, but in 4.6% of all patients with this examination previously unknown choledocholithiasis was diagnosed.     

Selected versus routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still widely advocated and standard in many departments, however, this is discussed controversially. We have developed a new diagnostic strategy to detect bile duct stones. The concept is based on an ultrasound examination and on a screening for the presence of six risk indicators of choledocholithiasis. 120 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively screened for the presence of six risk indicators of choledocholithiasis: history of jaundice; history of pancreatitis; hyperbilirubinemia; hyperamylasemia; dilated bile duct; unclear ultrasound findings. The sensitivity of ultrasound and of intraoperative cholangiography in diagnosing bile duct stones was also evaluated. For the detection of bile duct stones, the sensitivity was 77% for ultrasound and 100% for intraoperative cholangiography. 20% of all patients had at least one risk indicator. The presence of a risk indicator correlated significantly with the presence of choledocholithiasis (p < 0.01, chi-square-test). The negative predictive value of the total set of risk indicators was 100%. Following our diagnostic concept, we would have avoided 80% of intraoperative cholangiographies without missing a stone in the bile duct. This study lends further support to the view that the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not necessary.     

Comparison of routine and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

To evaluate the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we compared the frequency of concomitant common bile duct stones, their clinical outcome, and the frequency of bile duct injury between a group of 128 patients with routine preoperative ERC (group A) and 1010 patients with selective ERC (group B). Overall, 48 patients (4.2%) had duct stones, but the predictive signs were absent in six of them (12.5%). The stones were demonstrated by ERC and removed by sphincterotomy in all 11 patients in group A. Of 37 patients in group B, 22 were diagnosed by selective ERC and underwent endoscopic removal. Of four patients whose stones were found by operative cholangiography, one had immediate open surgery, another passed a stone spontaneously, and the other two underwent postoperative sphincterotomy, which failed in one. The stones were not recognized until pain recurred in the remaining 11 patients. Sphincterotomy was successful in nine patients but failed in the other two. Thus postoperative sphincterotomy failed in 3 of 13 patients (23%), necessitating open surgery. Forty-two patients overall (3.7%) had aberrant biliary tract anatomy, which did not lead to bile duct injury in any of the patients. Morbidity of routine ERC (3.1%) was lower than that of selective ERC (7.4%) (p < 0.05). It should be noted that a certain proportion of duct stones may be missed by selective ERC, necessitating laparotomy when sphincterotomy fails. The routine use of preoperative ERC may be justified at institutions where the expertise is available, at least until laparoscopic lithotomy becomes easy.     

Surgical significance of extrahepatic biliary tree anomalies

A patient with an anomalous insertion of the right hepatic duct into the cystic duct was noted during cholecystectomy and confirmed by operative cholangiography. This case and related anomalies of the bile ducts are of sufficient importance that, because of the technical difficulties and dangers incidental to their presence, no surgeon who operates on the gallbladder and bile ducts can afford to be unaware of their existence. Adequate exposure, careful dissection, and accurate knowledge of the regional anatomy plus a realization of the frequency and multiplicity of abnormalities of the extrahepatic biliary tree are requisites for safe biliary tract surgery. In addition, carefully performed operative cholangiography can be an indispensable aid in the clarification of anatomic variations. In case of recognized operative injury to the extrahepatic biliary tree, primary repair or biliary-intestinal anastomosis can usually be carried out with good results.     

Case report: malignant haemobilia detected in the gallbladder--retrograde cholangiographic findings

Haemobilia caused by gallbladder cancer is a rare condition and cholangiography rarely detects gallbladder haemorrhage because cancer cells or blood clots obstruct the cystic duct. We describe a patient with haemobilia caused by gallbladder cancer, in whom retrograde cholangiography showed a cast-like filling defect in the common bile duct and, in addition, several string-like defects in the gallbladder. The string-like defects appeared to be streams of clotted blood flowing towards the common bile duct in this case of relatively minor haemorrhage.     

Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Switzerland. A prospective 3-year study of 10,174 patients. Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery

BACKGROUND: We set out to analyze the technical aspects, intraoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a multi-institutional study representative of Switzerland. METHODS: Data were collected from 10,174 patients from 82 surgical services. A total of 353 different parameters per patient were included. RESULTS: We found intraoperative complications in 34.4% of patients and had a conversion rate of 8.2%. This rate was significantly increased in patients with complicated cholelithiasis and in those with previous upper-but not lower-abdominal surgery. In most cases, conversions to open procedures were required because of technical difficulties due to inflammatory changes and/or unclear anatomical findings at the time of operation. Bleeding was a common intraoperative complication, that significantly increased the risk of conversion. Patients with loss of gallstones in the peritoneal cavity had increased rates of abscesses. The rate of common bile duct injuries was 0.31%, but it decreased significantly as the laparoscopic experience of the surgeon increased. The rate of common bile duct injuries was not increased in patients with acute cholecystitis or in the 1.32% of patients undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Intraoperative cholangiography did not reduce the risk of common bile duct injuries, but it allowed them to be diagnosed intraoperatively in 75% of patients. Local complications were recorded in 4.79% of patients, and systemic complications were seen in 5.59%. The mortality rate was 0.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure, the rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy is still substantial. The conversion rate depends both on the indication and intraoperative complications. There is still a 10.38% morbidity associated with the procedure; however, the incidence of common bile duct injuries, which decreases with growing laparoscopic experience, was relatively low.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy causing injury to biliary tracts. Analysis of the results of 26,440 operations in Hungary

The authors analyse the etiology, diagnosis, treatment and outcome of 148 biliary tract injuries in connection with 26,440 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in 89 domestic institutes between January 1st, 1991, and December 31st, 1994. There was no significant correlation between the amount of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed in one institute and the incidence of biliary tract injuries and postoperative bile leakage (wide range of figures were found in different institutes), but in the second year of practice, the incidence of both complication decreased (there was statistically significant difference between the regression co-efficients). There was no significant correlation between the laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed and the rate of conversion, but the co-efficient of the regression curve showing the correlation of the absolute number of laparoscopic cholecystectomies and conversions significantly decreased in the second year of practice. In institutes having significantly more conversions, more cases of bile leakage was found also. There is a significantly positive relationship between biliary tract injuries and postoperative bile leakage; the more lesions are found in an institute, the more cases of bile leakage they have. There was no significant relationship between the incidence biliary tract injuries and postoperative bile leakage and the usage of intraoperative cholangiography, preoperative intravenous cholangiography and/or ERCP. The partial and complete injuries of main bile ducts were detected intraoperatively significantly more often while most of the lesions of the area of cystic duct were detected postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the types of the only postoperative recognized injuries and the time of establishing the diagnosis. Simple suture was performed in 69.2% of the partial injuries (with or without T-tube or other drainage), while 63.3% of the complete transsections were treated with biliodigestive anastomosis. In univariant analysis the type of injury, the primary treatment modality did not affect on the outcome (the ratio of cured and expired), but significantly more patients continue to have complaints following biliodigestive anastomosis than following the treatment of lesions around the cystic duct. The older the patient is, the worse the prognosis is. The primary treatment modality (biliodigestive anastomosis or biliary tract reconstruction with or without drain) did not significantly altered the necessity of reoperation. Thermic injury caused significantly more partial than complete lesion. Disturbance in identification of the anatomic structures leads significantly more partial or complete main bile duct injuries than lesion in region of the cystic duct and causes more complete transsections than partial lesions. According to multivariant analysis the outcome is significantly influenced in an adverse way by the necessity of repeated interventions and higher age.