Experimental and computational investigation of EVOH/clay nanocomposites

Ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH)/organoclay nanocomposites were prepared via a dynamic melt‐intercalation process. The effect of compatibilizers on the melt blending torque, intercalation level, and morphology of EVOH/organoclay systems was investigated. Maleic anhydride grafted ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA‐g‐ MA), or maleic anhydride grafted linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE‐g‐MA), were used to compatibilize EVOH with clay, at various concentrations (1, 5, and 10 wt %). Computer‐simulation techniques are used to predict structural properties and interactions of EVOH with compatibilizers in the presence and absence of clay. The simulation results strongly support the experimental findings and their interpretation. X‐ray diffraction shows enhanced intercalation within the galleries when the compatibilizers were added. Interestingly, results were obtained for the EVOH/clay/compatibilizer systems, owing to a high level of interaction developed in these systems. Thermal analysis shows that, upon increasing the compatibilizer content, lower crystallinity levels result, until at a certain compatibilizer content no crystallization is taking place. Significantly higher mixing viscosity levels were obtained for the EVOH/organoclay blends compared with the neat EVOH polymer. The storage modulus was higher compared with the uncompatibilized EVOH/organoclay blend in the presence of EVA‐g‐MA compatibilizer (at all concentrations), and only at low contents of LLDPE‐g‐MA. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2060–2066, 2005     

Effects of different compatibilizers on the rheological,thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE blend‐based nanocomposites

The influence of two different compatibilizers and their combination (maleic anhydride grafted high density polyethylene, HDPE‐g‐MA; maleic anhydride grafted linear low density polyethylene, LLDPE‐g‐MA; and 50/50 wt % mixture of these compatibilizers) on the rheological, thermomechanical, and morphological properties of HDPE/LLDPE/organoclay blend‐based nanocomposites was evaluated. Nanocomposites were obtained by melt‐intercalation in a torque rheometer in two steps. Masterbatches (compatibilizer/nanoclay 2:1) were obtained and subsequently diluted in the HDPE/LLDPE matrix producing nanocomposites with 2.5 wt % of nanoclay. Wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), steady‐state rheological properties, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were used to determine the influence of different compatibilizer systems on intercalation and/or exfoliation process which occurs preferentially in the amorphous phase, and thermomechanical properties. The LLDPE‐g‐MA with a high melt index (and consequently low viscosity and crystallinity) was an effective compatibilizer for this system. Furthermore, the compatibilized nanocomposites with LLDPE‐g‐MA or mixture of HDPE‐g‐MA and LLDPE‐g‐MA exhibited better nanoclay's dispersion and distribution with stronger interactions between the matrix and the nanoclay. These results indicated that the addition of maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene facilitates both, the exfoliation and/or intercalation of the clays and its adhesion to HDPE/LLDPE blend. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 130: 1726–1735, 2013     

Properties of uncompatibilized and compatibilized poly(butylene terephthalate)–LLDPE blends

In this work, blends of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) were prepared. LLDPE was used as an impact modifier. Since the system was found to be incompatible, compatibilization was sought for by the addition of the following two types of functionalized polyethylene: ethylene vinylacetate copolymer (EVA) and maleic anhydride‐grafted EVA copolymer (EVA‐g‐MAH). The effects of the compatibilizers on the rheological and mechanical properties of the blends have been also quantitatively investigated. The impact strength of the PBT–LLDPE binary blends slightly increased at a lower concentration of LLDPE but increased remarkably above a concentration of 60 wt % of LLDPE. The morphology of the blends showed that the LLDPE particles had dispersed in the PBT matrix below 40 wt % of LLDPE, while, at 60 wt % of LLDPE, a co‐continuous morphology was obtained, which could explain the increase of the impact strength of the blend. Generally, the mechanical strength was decreased by adding LLDPE to PBT. Addition of EVA or EVA‐g‐MAH as a compatibilizer to PBT–LLDPE (70/30) blend considerably improved the impact strength of the blend without significantly sacrificing the tensile and the flexural strength. More improvement in those mechanical properties was observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH system than for the EVA system. A larger viscosity increase was also observed in the case of the EVA‐g‐MAH than EVA. This may be due to interaction of the EVA‐g‐MAH with PBT. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 989–997, 1999     

Use of modified poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) in the compatibilization of poly(ϵ‐caprolactone)/maize starch blends

In this work, the compatibilization of a poly(?‐caprolactone) with a number‐average molecular weight of 120,000 g/mol (PCL¹²⁰) and maize starch was investigated by the addition of a chemically modified poly(?‐caprolactone). Two types of blends were prepared by melt extrusion. In type A blends, low‐molecular‐weight compatibilizers were used: (1) a poly(?‐caprolactone) with a number‐average molecular weight of 10,000 g/mol that was reacted with maleic anhydride to obtain chains terminating in carboxylic groups and (2) low‐molecular‐weight poly(?‐caprolactone)s (number‐average molecular weights of 600 and 2000 g/mol) with one pendant carboxylic group within the chains. With these groups of blends, tensile testing and scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that the compatibilizers were generally effective in inducing a better dispersion for a 60/40 poly(?‐caprolactone)/maize starch blend with a compatibilizer, improving the mechanical properties in comparison with uncompatibilized blends. The blends with 30% starch were not improved by the addition of compatibilizer, and this may be related to the rheology of the blends during preparation. In type B blends, high‐molecular‐weight compatibilizers were prepared through the grafting of variable amounts of acrylic acid or maleic anhydride to PCL¹²⁰ chains. The best compatibilizer action was obtained with 0.7 wt % maleic anhydride grafted to PCL¹²⁰ because both the dispersion and mechanical properties were further improved in comparison with uncompatibilized blends and type A blends. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Synthesis and properties of reactively compatibilized polyester and polyamide blends

The functionalization of poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) has been accomplished in a twin screw extruder by grafting maleic anhydride (MA) using a free radical polymerization technique. The resulting PBT‐g‐MA was successfully used as a compatibilizer for the binary blends of polyester (PBT) and polyamide (PA66). Enhanced mechanical properties were achieved for the blend containing a small amount (as low as 2.5 %) of PBT‐g‐MA compared to the binary blend of unmodified PBT with PA66. Loss and storage moduli for blends containing compatibilizer were higher than those of uncompatibilized blends or their respective polymers. The grafting and compatibilization reactions were confirmed using FTIR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy. The properties of these blends were studied in detail by varying the amount of compatibilizer, and the improved mechanical behaviour was correlated with the morphology with the help of scanning electron microscopy. Morphology studies also revealed the interfacial interaction in the blend containing grafted PBT. The improvement in the properties of these blends can be attributed to the effective interaction of grafted maleic anhydride groups with the amino group in PA66. The results indicate that PBT‐g‐MA acts as an effective compatibilizer for the immiscible blends of PBT and PA66. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry     

Blends of recycled polycarbonate and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene: comparing the effect of reactive compatibilizers on mechanical and morphological properties

Blends of recycled polycarbonate (PC) and acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene (ABS) were prepared and some mechanical and morphological properties were investigated. To compatibilize these blends, ABS‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (ABS‐g‐MA) and (ethylene–vinyl acetate)‐g‐(maleic anhydride) (EVA‐g‐MA) with similar degree of grafting of 1.5% were used. To compare the effect of the type of compatibilizer on mechanical properties, blends were prepared using 3, 5 and 10 phr of each compatibilizer. A co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder was used for blending. The results showed that ABS‐g‐MA had no significant effect on the tensile strength of the blends while EVA‐g‐MA decreased the tensile strength, the maximum decrease being about 9.6% when using 10 phr of this compatibilizer. The results of notched Charpy impact strength tests showed that EVA‐g‐MA increased the impact strength of blends more than ABS‐g‐MA. The maximum value of this increase occurred when using 5 phr of each compatibilizer, it being about 54% for ABS‐g‐MA and 165% for EVA‐g‐MA. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs showed that the particle size of the dispersed phase was decreased in the continuous phase of PC by using the compatibilizers. Moreover, a blend without compatibilizer showed brittle behaviour while the blends containing compatibilizer showed ductile behaviour in fracture. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry     

Mechanical properties and morphology of polylactide,linear low‐density polyethylene,and their blends

Melt blending of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) and polylactide (PLA) was performed in an extrusion mixer with post extrusion blown film attachment with and without compatibilizer‐grafted low density polyethylene maleic anhydride. The blend compositions were optimized for tensile properties as per ASTM D 882‐91. On the basis of this, LLDPE 80 [80 wt % LLDPE and 20 wt % poly(L ‐lactic acid) (PLLA)] and MA‐g‐low‐density polyethylene 80/4 (80 wt % LLDPE, 20 wt % PLLA, and 4 phr compatibilizer) were found to be an optimum composition. The blends were characterized according to their mechanical, thermal, and morphological behavior. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the presence of compatibilizer enhanced the blend compatibility to some extent. The morphological characteristics of the blends with and without compatibilizer were examined by scanning electron microscopy. The dispersion of PLLA in the LLDPE matrix increased with the addition of compatibilizer. This blend may be used for packaging applications. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Correlation between the morphology and dynamic mechanical properties of ethylene vinyl acetate/linear low‐density polyethylene blends: Effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization

The effects of the blend composition and compatibilization on the morphology of linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) blends were studied. The blends showed dispersed/matrix and cocontinuous phase morphologies that depended on the composition. The blends had a cocontinuous morphology at an EVA concentration of 40–60%. The addition of the compatibilizer first decreased the domain size of the dispersed phase, which then leveled off. Two types of compatibilizers were added to the polymer/polymer interface: linear low‐density polyethylene‐g‐maleic anhydride and LLDPE‐g phenolic resin. Noolandi's theory was in agreement with the experimental data. The conformation of the compatibilizer at the blend interface could be predicted by the calculation of the area occupied by the compatibilizer molecule at the interface. The effects of the blend ratio and compatibilization on the dynamic mechanical properties of the blends were analyzed from ?60°C to +35°C. The experiments were performed over a series of frequencies. The area under the curve of the loss modulus versus the temperature was higher than the values obtained by group contribution analysis. The loss tangent curve showed a peak corresponding to the glass transition of EVA, indicating the incompatibility of the blend system. The damping characteristics of the blends increased with increasing EVA content because of the decrease in the crystalline volume of the system. Attempts were made to correlate the observed viscoelastic properties of the blends with the morphology. Various composite models were used to model the dynamic mechanical data. Compatibilization increased the storage modulus of the system because of the fine dispersion of EVA domains in the LLDPE matrix, which provided increased interfacial interaction. Better compatibilization was effected at a 0.5–1% loading of the compatibilizer. This was in full agreement with the dynamic mechanical spectroscopy data. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 4526–4538, 2006     

The effect of interface characteristics on the static and dynamic mechanical properties of three‐component polymer alloys

The effect of interfacial characteristics on the structure‐property relationships of ternary polymer alloys and blends comprising polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and glass beads (GB) or fibers (GF) was investigated. The systems studied were based on a binary PP/EVOH immiscible blend, representing a blend of a semi‐crystalline apolar polymer with a semi‐crystalline highly polar copolymer. The ternary systems studied consisted of filler particles encapsulated by EVOH, with some of the minor EVOH component separately dispersed within the PP matrix. Modification of the interfacial properties was done using silane coupling agents for the EVOH/glass interface and compatibilization using a maleic anhydride grafted PP (MA‐g‐PP) for the PP/EVOH interface. Both glass fillers increased the dynamic modulus and decreased the damping of the neat polymers and of their binary blends, especially in the rubbery region. GF has a more profound effect on both the modulus and the damping. Glass surface treatments and compatibilization have only a marginal effect on the dynamic mechanical behavior of the ternary blends. Yet, compatibilization shifted the polymers' T_gS to higher temperatures. Both glass fillers increased the elastic modulus of the binary blends, where GF performed better than GB as a reinforcing agent. GF slightly increased the strength of the binary blends while, GB reduced it. Both fillers reduced the ductility of the binary blends. The blends' mechanical properties were related to the morphology and their components' crystallinity. The compatibilizer increases both stiffness and strength and reduces deformability.     

Morphology,deformation behavior and thermomechanical properties of polypropylene/maleic anhydride grafted polypropylene/layered silicate nanocomposites

Nanocomposites polypropylene (PP) with 3 and 7 wt % of clay were prepared by melt mixing. Four types of maleic anhydride grafted PP (MAPP) in broad range of MA groups content (0.3–4 wt %) and molecular weights (MW) were used as polar compatibilizers. The effect of the MAPP kind on both the clay dispersion and miscibility with PP was studied. The mixed intercalated/exfoliated morphologies of nanocomposites in the presence of all studied compatibilizers were revealed by XRD and TEM. The oligomer compatibilizer with 4 wt % of MA groups increases the intercalation ability of polymer into clay galleries but this one has limited miscibility with PP and worsens crystalline structure of polymer matrix. The MAPPs with 0.3–1.3% of MA are characterized by the lower intercalation ability but well cocrystallize with PP. Maximum reinforcing effect is attained using high MW MAPP with 0.6% MA and for nanocomposite with 7 wt % (3.8 vol %) of clay it averages almost 1.7 times relative to neat PP and 1.3 times relative to noncompatibilized composite. Dynamic storage moduli of nanocomposites compatibilized by MAPPs with 0.3–1.3% of MA containing 7 wt % of clay increase up to 1.4–1.5 around 30–75°C and over the whole temperature range remain higher compared with both neat PP and uncompatibilized composite. On the contrary, the oligomer MAPP with 4 wt % of MA groups decreases the thermal–mechanical stability of nanocomposite at high temperature compared with both PP and uncompatibilized composites. The study of nanocomposites flammability showed that creating complex composites containing both layered silicate and relatively small amount of magnesium hydroxide can be a successful approach to reduce the combustibility of PP‐based nanocomposites. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

双单体接枝物增容PP/EVOH共混物形态结构及性能

采用反应型双螺杆挤出机制备了双单体接枝物聚丙烯（PP）接枝马来酸酐（MAH）和三烯丙基异氰脲酸酯（TAIC）[PP-g-(MAH-co-TAIC)],并以此增容PP/乙烯-乙烯醇共聚物（EVOH）共混物。研究了共混增容体系的相容性、流变性能、结晶性能、力学性能和阻隔性能。红外光谱分析表明, 接枝物加入后,在EVOH的羟基和接枝物的酸酐基团之间发生了反应,体系的相容性因此得以改观;TAIC的加入使PP的接枝率提高了13 %;扫描电子显微镜观察证实,接枝物的加入促进了EVOH和PP之间的界面结合,减小了分散相的尺寸。流变性能测试表明,TAIC的加入抑制了PP的降解;差示扫描量热仪分析表明,接枝物的加入使得PP和EVOH的结晶温度得到了提高。双单体接枝物的共混体系与单一单体接枝物的共混体系相比,对力学性能影响不大,但阻隔性能有所提高,当共单体添加量为0.4份（质量份,下同）时,体系的阻隔性能提高了28 %。     

Barrier property by controlled laminar morphology of LLDPE/EVOH blends

Using the extrusion blown film process, we obtained linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE)/ethylenevinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) blends with an improved barrier property by generating a laminar structure of the dispersed phase in the matrix phase. This laminar morphology induced by drawing and blowing was found to result in a significant decrease in toluene permeability with only 10 wt% EVOH. Effects of compatibilizer content and processing parameters such as blending sequence, screw configuration, and stretch ratio on the toluene permeability and morphology of the blends were investigated. It was revealed that the optimum amount of compatibilizer, maleic anhydride grafted LLDPE, should be used to improve the barrier property of the LLDPE/EVOH blends with a well developed laminar structure. The blending sequence had a significant influence on the permeability of the blends. The blend films exhibited a more pronounced laminar structure when all blend components were simultaneously melt blended in a single screw extruder. In addition, the screw configuration designed to impart a low shear stress and the balanced stretching in the machine and transverse directions were more favorable processing conditions in obtaining high barrier blends.     

Fracture toughness of modified polypropylene/poly(styrene‐ran‐butadiene) blends

Fracture toughness of polypropylene (PP)/poly(styrene‐ran‐butadiene) rubber (SBR) blends as a function of concentration of maleic anhydride (MA) in the maleated polypropylene (MAPP) compatibilizer was investigated under uniaxial static and impact loading conditions. The addition of MAPP to the unmodified PP/rubber blend enhanced the tensile modulus and yield stress as well as the Charpy impact strength. The maximum values were recorded at 1.0 wt% grafted MA in the compatibilizer. V‐shaped blunt‐notched specimens exhibited typical ductile behavior and no breakage of the specimens occurred during the impact fracture tests. Sharp‐notched specimens of uncompatibilized and low‐content MA blends broke in a semibrittle manner, supported by a rapid crack propagation process. Increasing MA content in the blends led to semibrittle‐to‐ductile transition characterized by stable crack propagation. Fracture mechanics experiments, supplemented by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), were also employed to obtain a better understanding of the fracture and deformation behavior. Copyright © 2005 Society of Chemical Industry     

The role of the compatibilizer on the microindentation hardness of iPP/PC blends

Blends of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) and polycarbonate (PC) with and without a compatibilizer were prepared using a Brabender Haake Rheocord at 260°C and 32 rpm. Maleic anhydride grafted styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene (SEBS‐g‐MAH) and maleic anhydride grafted ethylene–propylene diene (EPDM‐g‐MAH) were chosen as compatibilizers and their proportion was set to 5, 10, and 15 wt%, respectively. The thermal properties and crystallization behavior were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide angle X‐ray scattering (WAXS). Micromechanical properties were also investigated using a Vickers microindentation tester. The DSC analysis indicates that the melting temperature of iPP in the all the blends, compatibilized and uncompatibilized ones, remains constant and is almost the same as those of the pure component. On the other hand, it is shown that the degree of crystallinity of iPP in the blends calculated by DSC and WAXS is dependent of the composition of the polymeric mixture. However the hardness (H) decreases with increasing PC content until the composition of iPP/PC (75/25) is reached, whereas for larger PC content values, H increases. The same trend was obtained with the addition of both compatibilizers. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1138–1145, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Morphology and properties of nylon 6 and high density polyethylene blends in presence of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA

In this study, we report the synergistic effect of nanoclay and maleic anhydride grafted polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA) on the morphology and properties of (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/high density polyethylene (HDPE) blend. Polymer blend nanocomposites containing nanoclay with and without compatibilizer (PE‐g‐MA) were prepared by melt mixing, and their morphologies and structures were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and wide angle X‐ray diffractometer (WAXD) study. The size of phase‐separated domains decreased considerably with increasing content of nanoclay and PE‐g‐MA. WAXD study and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed the presence of exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix, as well as, at the interface of the (80/20 w/w) nylon 6/HDPE blend–clay nanocomposites. Addition of PE‐g‐MA in the blend–clay nanocomposites enhanced the exfoliation of clays in nylon 6 matrix and especially at the interface. Thus, exfoliated clay platelets in nylon 6 matrix effectively restricted the coalescence of dispersed HDPE domains while PE‐g‐MA improved the adhesion between the phases at the interface. The use of compatibilizer and nanoclay in polymer blends may lead to a high performance material which combines the advantages of compatibilized polymer blends and the merits of polymer nanocomposites. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2012     

Preparation and properties of styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer/clay nanocomposites: I. Effect of clay content and compatibilizer types

BACKGROUND: Polymer/clay (silicate) systems exhibit great promise for industrial applications due to their ability to display synergistically advanced properties with relatively small amounts of clay loads. The effects of various compatibilizers on styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer (SEBS)/clay nanocomposites with various amounts of clay using a melt mixing process are investigated. RESULTS: SEBS/clay nanocomposites were prepared via melt mixing. Two types of maleated compatibilizers, styrene–ethylene–butylene–styrene block copolymer grafted maleic anhydride (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polypropylene grafted maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA), were incorporated to improve the dispersion of various amounts of commercial organoclay (denoted as 20A). Experimental samples were analyzed using X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Thermal stability was enhanced through the addition of clay with or without compatibilizers. The dynamic mechanical properties and rheological properties indicated enhanced interaction for the compatibilized nanocomposites. In particular, the PP‐g‐MA compatibilized system conferred higher tensile strength or Young's modulus than the SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilized system, although SEBS‐g‐MA seemed to further expand the interlayer spacing of the clay compared with PP‐g‐MA. CONCLUSION: These unusual results suggest that the matrix properties and compatibilizer types are crucial factors in attaining the best mechanical property performance at a specific clay content. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry     

Structure and oxygen‐barrier properties of (linear low‐density polyethylene/ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer)/linear low‐density polyethylene composite films prepared by microlayer coextrusion

Ethylene–vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and linear low‐density polyethylene (LLDPE) blends with 5% LLDPE grafted with 1% maleic anhydride (MAH; EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH), created to increase the interfacial compatibility, were coextruded with pure LLDPE through the microlayer coextrusion technology. The phase morphology and gas‐barrier properties of the alternating‐layered (EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH)/LLDPE composites were studied by scanning electron microscopy observation and oxygen permeation coefficient measurement. The experimental results show that the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers were parallel to each other, and the continuity of each layer was clearly evident. This structure greatly decreased the oxygen permeability coefficient compared to the pure LLDPE and the barrier percolation threshold because of the existence of the LLDPE/EVOH/LLDPE‐g‐MAH blend layers, and the LLDPE layers diluted the concentration of EVOH in the whole composites. In addition, the effects of the layer thickness ratio of the EVOH/LLDPE/LLDPE‐g‐MAH and LLDPE layers and the layer number on the barrier properties of the layered composites were investigated. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 42211.     

Effect of interfacial interaction on the crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO3 composites modified by compatibilizers

To investigate the effect of interfacial interaction on the crystallization and mechanical properties of polypropylene (PP)/nano‐CaCO₃ composites, three kinds of compatibilizers [PP grafted with maleic anhydride (PP‐g‐MA), ethylene–octene copolymer grafted with MA (POE‐g‐MA), and ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer grafted with MA (EVA‐g‐MA)] with the same polar groups (MA) but different backbones were used as compatibilizers to obtain various interfacial interactions among nano‐CaCO₃, compatibilizer, and PP. The results indicated that compatibilizers encapsulated nano‐CaCO₃ particles, forming a core–shell structure, and two interfaces were obtained in the compatibilized composites: interface between PP and compatibilizer and interface between compatibilizer and nano‐CaCO₃ particles. The crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO₃ composites were dependent on the interfacial interactions of these two interfaces, especially the interfacial interaction between PP and compatibilizer. The good compatibility between PP chain in PP‐g‐MA and PP matrix improved the dispersion of nano‐CaCO₃ particles, favored the nucleation effect of nano‐CaCO₃, increased the tensile strength and modulus, but reduced the ductility and impact strength of composites. The partial compatibility between POE in POE‐g‐MA and PP matrix had little effect on crystallization and mechanical properties of PP/nano‐CaCO₃ composites. The poor compatibility between EVA in EVA‐g‐MA and PP matrix retarded the nucleation effect of nano‐CaCO₃, and reduced the tensile strength, modulus, and impact strength. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Property enhancement in polypropylene ternary blend nanocomposites via a novel poly(ethylene oxide)‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene toughener–compatibilizer system

Synthesis and characterization of a novel toughener–compatibilizer for polypropylene (PP)–montmorillonite (MMT) nanocomposites were conducted to provide enhanced mechanical and thermal properties. Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) blocks were synthetically grafted onto maleic anhydride‐grafted polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene/butylene)‐block‐polystyrene (SEBS‐g‐MA). Special attention was paid to emphasize the effect of PEO‐grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐PEO) against SEBS‐g‐MA on morphology, static/dynamic mechanical properties and surface hydrophilicity of the resultant blends and nanocomposites. It was found that the silicate layers of neat MMT are well separated by PEO chains chemically bonded to nonpolar SEBS polymer without needing any organophilic modification of the clay as confirmed by X‐ray diffraction and transmission electron microscopy analyses. From scanning electron microscopy analyses, elastomeric domains interacting with MMT layers via PEO sites were found to be distributed in the PP matrix with higher number and smaller sizes than the corresponding blend. As a benefit of PEO grafting, SEBS‐g‐PEO‐containing nanocomposite exhibited not only higher toughness/impact strength but also increased creep recovery, as compared to corresponding SEBS‐g‐MA‐containing nanocomposite and neat PP. The damping parameter of the same nanocomposite was also found to be high in a broad range of temperatures as another advantage of the SEBS‐g‐PEO toughener–compatibilizer. The water contact angles of the blends and nanocomposites were found to be lower than that of neat hydrophobic PP which is desirable for finishing processes such as dyeing and coating. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry     

Morphological,thermal, rheological,and mechanical properties of PP/EVOH blends compatibilized with PP‐g‐IA

We prepared some blends of polypropylene (PP) and ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH) with and without a compatibilizer. As a new compatibilizer, we synthesized polypropylene grafted with itaconic acid (PP‐g‐IA) using Brabender mixing system. We investigated the morphological, thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of a compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH/PP‐g‐IA) and not compatibilized blends (PP/EVOH). Our experiments showed that carboxylic acid groups in PP‐g‐IA and hydroxyl group in EVOH formed strong in situ hydrogen bond in the compatibilized blends, resulting in better morphological and mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends than those of not compatibilized blends. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 56:1240–1247, 2016. © 2016 Society of Plastics Engineers