Reinvestigation of Al–Si Spinel Phase in Diphasic Al2O3–SiO2 Gel

Mechanical mixture of γ-Al₂O₃ and amorphous SiO₂, and diphasic Al₂O₃/SiO₂ gels of three different compositions were synthesized. They were subjected to heat treatment to various temperatures in the range 900°–1600°C. Qualitative X-ray diffraction data show that these diphasic gels do not crystallize to a combined mixture of θ-Al₂O₃ and α-Al₂O₃ polymorphs at the intermediate stage, prior to mullite formation. Estimated mullite formation data show that the course of its formation from mixed oxides was different from that of diphasic gels. Results are compared with previous findings and the concept of Al–Si spinel formation in the phase transformation of stoichiometric diphasic gel system is substantiated.     

Application of Compositionally Diphasic Xerogels for Enhanced Densification: The System Al2O3-SiO2

Stoichiometric mullite (71.38 wt% Al₂O₃-28.17 wt% SiO₂) and 80 wt% Al₂O₃-20 wt% SiO₂ gels were prepared by the single-phase and/or diphasic routes. Dense sintered bodies were prepared from both sets of gels in the Al₂O₃-SiO₂ system. Apparent densities of 96% and 97% of theoretical density were measured for the diphasic (using two sols) mullite samples sintered at 1200° and 1300°C for 100 min, respectively; this compared with 85% and 94% for the single-phase xerogels under the same conditions, and to much lower values for mullite prepared from conventional mixed powders. The microstructure of the mullite pellets from diphasic xerogel precursors is also considerably finer.     

Transformation, Microstructure Development, and Densification in α-Fe2O3-Seeded Boehmite-Derived Alumina

Addition of α-Fe₂O₃ seed particles to alkoxide-derived boehmite sols resulted in a 10-fold increase in isothermal rate constants for the transformation of γ- to α-Al₂O₃. Changes in porosity and surface area with sintering temperature showed no effect of seeding on coarsening of the transition alumina gels, but the 200-fold decrease in surface area associated with transformation to α-Al₂O₃ occurred ∼ 100°C lower in seeded gels compared with unseeded materials. As a result of high nucleation frequency and reduced microstructure coarsening, fully transformed seeded alumina retained specific surface areas >22 m²/g and exhibited narrow pore size distributions, permitting development of fully dense, submicrometer α-Al₂O₃ at ∼ 1200°C.     

Size Control of α-Al2O3 Platelets Synthesized in Molten Na2SO4 Flux

α-Al₂O₃ platelet powders were synthesized in molten Na₂SO₄ flux. The size of α-Al₂O₃ platelets was significantly reduced when partially decomposed rather than pure Al₂(SO₄)₃ was used as the source of Al₂O₃; a further reduction in the platelet size was realized through additional seeding with nanosized α-Al₂O₃ seeds. The addition of microsized α-Al₂O₃ platelet seeds significantly influenced the platelet morphology of the final powder, as well. The platelet size of the final powder was in direct proportion to the size of the platelet seeds, and was in reverse proportion to the cube root of the platelet seed content.     

The System Al2O3-Cr2O3-Sio2

Liquidus phase equilibrium data are presented for the system Al₂O₃-Cr₂O₃-SiO₂. The liquidus diagram is dominated by a large, high-temperature, two-liquid region overlying the primary phase field of corundum solid solution. Other important features are a narrow field for mullite solid solution, a very small cristobalite field, and a ternary eutectic at 1580°C. The eutectic liquid (6Al₂O₃-ICr₂O₃-93SiO₂) coexists with a mullite solid solution (61Al₂O₃-10Cr₂O₃-29SiO₂), a corundum solid solution (19Al₂O₃-81Cr₂O₃), and cristobalite (SO₂). Diagrams are presented to show courses of fractional crystallization, courses of equilibrium crystallization, and phase relations on isothermal planes at 1800°, 1700°, and 1575°C. Tie lines were sketched to indicate the composition of coexisting mullite and corundum solid solution phases.     

Crystallization of Beta NaFeO2 from a Glass Along the Na2SiO3-Fe2O3 Join

Fine-particle beta sodium ferrite (β-NaFeO₂), rather than α-Fe₂O₃, may be responsible for superparamagnetic behavior in a glass of composition (in mole fractions) 0.37Na₂O-0.26Fe₂O₃-0.37SiO₂. The 700°C isothermal section of the phase diagram of the Na₂O-Fe₂O₃-SiO₂ system is given, showing a three-phase field bounded by Na₂SiO₃-NaFeO₂-Fe₂O₃; there is no evidence for the existence (at 700°C) of compounds of molar composition 6Na₂O-4Fe₂O₃-5SiO₂ or 2Na₂O-Fe₂O₃-SiO₂. The Moessbauer spectrum of β-NaFeO₂ has an internal magnetic field of 487 kOe at room temperature.     

Crystallization Behavior of Al2O3 in the Presence or SiO2

The independent crystallization sequence of an Al₂O₃ component is modified in the presence of SiO₂ and vice versa. Mixed SiO₂-Al₂O₃, gel (28 wt% SiO₂ and 72 wt% Al₂O₃) forms neither cristobalite nor γ-Al₂O₃ and corundum at 1000°C but forms Si-Al spinel; an amorphous aluminosilicate phase invariably also forms after the gel is heated. However, the composition of this amorphous aluminosilicate phase is not as yet known.     

Conversion from β-Ce2O3·11Al2O3 to α-Al2O3 in Tetragonal ZrO2 Matrix

Composites of β-Ce₂O₃·11Al₂O₃ and tetragonal ZrO₂ were fabricated by a reductive atmosphere sintering of mixed powders of CeO₂, ZrO₂ (2 mol% Y₂O₃), and Al₂O₃. The composites had microstructures composed of elongated grains of β-Ce₂O₃·11Al₂O₃ in a Y-TZP matrix. The β-Ce₂O₃·11Al₂O₃ decomposed to α-Al₂O₃ and CeO₂ by annealing at 1500°C for 1 h in oxygen. The elongated single grain of β-Ce₂O₃·11Al₂O₃ divided into several grains of α-Al₂O₃ and ZrO₂ doped with Y₂O₃ and CeO₂. High-temperature bending strength of the oxygen-annealed α-Al₂O₃ composite was comparable to the β-Ce₂O₃·11Al₂O₃ composite before annealing.     

Effects of Amorphous and Crystalline SiO2 Additives on γ-Al2O3-to-alpha-Al2O3 Phase Transitions

This paper focused on the effects of various phases of SiO₂ additives on the γ-Al₂O₃-to-α-Al₂O₃ phase transition. In the differential thermal analysis, the exothermic peak temperature that corresponded to the theta-to-α phase transition was elevated by adding amorphous SiO₂, such as fumed silica and silica gel obtained from the hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate. In contrast, the peak temperature was reduced by adding crystalline SiO₂, such as quartz and cristobalite. Amorphous SiO₂ was considered to retard the γ-to-α phase transition by preventing γ-Al₂O₃ particles from coming into contact and suppressing heterogeneous nucleation on the γ-Al₂O₃ surface. On the other hand, crystalline SiO₂ accelerated the α-Al₂O₃ transition; thus, this SiO₂ may be considered to act as heterogeneous nucleation sites. The structural difference among the various SiO₂ additives, especially amorphous and crystalline phases, largely influenced the temperature of γ-Al₂O₃-to-α-Al₂O₃ phase transition.     

Precise Determination of the 3CaO·SiO2 Cells and Interpretation of Their X-Ray Diffraction Patterns

The cell dimensions of pure triclinic 3CaO·SiO₂ and monoclinic 3CaO·SiO₂ solid solution (54CaO·16SiO₂·Al₂O₃·MgO) were determined and the powder diffraction patterns were indexed by the method of precise measurement of the spacings. The lattice constants are expressed in terms of triclinic or monoclinic cells corresponding to pseudo-orthorhombic cells derived from Jeffery's trigonal cell. The apparent lattice constants for pure 3CaO·SiO₂ are a = 12.195 a.u., b = 7.104 au., c = 25.096 a.u., α= 90°, β= 89°44'γ= 89°44'; for 54CaO·16SiO₂.-Al₂O₃MgO, a = 12.246 a.u., b = 7.045 a.u., c = 24.985 a.u., β= 90°04'. Precise lattice constants of Jeffery's monoclinic lattice for 54CaO.-16SiO₂-Al₂O₃·MgO are derived as a = 33.091 a.u., b = 7.045 a.u., c = 18.546 a.u., β= 94°08'. High-temperature X-ray patterns showed that pure triclinic 3CaO·SiO₂ transformed to a monoclinic form at about 920°C. and then to a trigonal form at about 970°C. Monoclinic 54CaO.16SiO₂·Al₂O₃–MgO transformed to trigonal at about 830°C. These transitions were reversible and reproducible and were accompanied by only slight deformation of the structure forms.     

Growth of Single-Crystal and Polycrystalline Thin Films of MgAl2O4 and MgFe2O4

Single-crystal and polycrystalline films of Mg-Al₂O₄ and MgFe₂O₄ were formed by two methods on cleavage surfaces of MgO single crystals. In one procedure, aluminum was deposited on MgO by vacuum evaporation. Subsequent heating in air at about 510°C formed a polycrystalline γ-Al₂O₈ film. Above 540°C, the γ-Al₂O, and MgO reacted to form a single-crystal MgAl₂O₄ film with {001} MgAl₂O₄‖{001} MgO. Above 590°C, an additional layer of MgAl₂O₄, which is polycrystalline, formed between the γ-Al₂O₃ and the single-crystal spinel. Polycrystalline Mg-Al₂O₄ formed only when diffusion of Mg²⁺ ions proceeded into the polycrystalline γ-Al₂O₃ region. Corresponding results were obtained for Mg-Fe₂O₄. MgAl₂O₄ films were also formed on cleaved MgO single-crystal substrates by direct evaporation, using an Al₂O₃ crucible as a source. Very slow deposition rates were used with source temperatures of ∼1350°C and substrate temperatures of ∼800°C. Departures from single-crystal character in the films may arise through temperature gradients in the substrate.     

Growth of Tabular α-Al2O3 Grains on Porous Alumina Substrate

Gradient, porous alumina ceramics were prepared with the characteristics of microsized tabular α-Al₂O₃ grains grown on a surface with a fine interlocking feature. The samples were formed by spin-coating diphasic aluminosilicate sol on porous alumina substrates. The sol consisted of nano-sized pseudo-boehmite (AlOOH) and hydrolyzed tetraethyl orthosilicate [Si(OC₂H₅)₄]. After drying and sintering at 1150°–1450°C, the crystallographic and chemical properties of the porous structures were investigated by analytical electron microscopy. The results show that the formation of tabular α-Al₂O₃ grains is controlled by the dissolution of fine Al₂O₃ in the diphasic material at the interface. The nucleation and growth of tabular α-Al₂O₃ grains proceeds heterogeneously at the Al₂O₃/glass interface by ripening nano-sized Al₂O₃ particles.     

Phase Diagram of a Portion of the System Na3AlF6-AlF3-Al2O3.

The system Na₃AlF₆-AlF₃-Al₂O₃ was investigated by a combination of quenching, optical microscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction techniques in order to define liquidus temperatures, univariant lines, and invariant points. Phase fields for the primary crystallization of cryolite, chiolite, aluminum fluoride, α-alumina, and η-alumina were located. A ternary peritectic point contained 28.3% AlF₃-4.4% Al₂O₃-67.3% Na₃AlF₆ at 723°C. A eutectic point of composition 37.3% AlF₃-3.2% Al₂O₃-59.5% Na₃AlF₆ occurs at 684°C.     

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Pressed α-Al2O3-Seeded γ-Alumina Ceramics

High-quality alumina ceramics were fabricated by a hot pressing with MgO and SiO₂ as additives using α-Al₂O₃-seeded nanocrystalline γ-Al₂O₃ powders as the raw material. Densification behavior, microstructure evolution, and mechanical properties of alumina were investigated from 1250°C to 1450°C. The seeded γ-Al₂O₃ sintered to 98% relative density at 1300°C. Obvious grain growth was observed at 1400°C and plate-like grains formed at 1450°C. For the 1350°C hot-pressed alumina ceramics, the grain boundary regions were generally clean. Spinel and mullite formed in the triple-grain junction regions. The bending strength and fracture toughness were 565 MPa and 4.5 MPa·m^1/2, respectively. For the 1300°C sintered alumina ceramics, the corresponding values were 492 MPa and 4.9 MPa·m^1/2.     

Chemical Vapor Deposition of Polycrystalline Al2O3

Polycrystalline Al₂O₃ was chemically vapor-deposited onto sintered Al₂O₃ substrates by reaction of AlCl₃ with (1) H₂O, (2) CO:H₂, and (3) O₂ at 1000° and 1500°C and 0.5 and 5.0 torr. Although the thermodynamics of all these reactions predict the formation of solid Al₂O₃, the deposition rate of the first reaction was considerably greater than that of the second. The third reaction was so slow that no measurable deposit was formed in 6 h at 1500°C. Formation of dense deposits of α-Al₂O₃ was favored by increasing temperature and decreasing pressure. Microstructural examination of the dense deposits showed long columnar grains, the largest of which extended through the deposit from the substrate to the surface.     

Influence of Cr and Fe on Formation of α-Al2O3 from γ-Al2O3

The effect of Cr and Fe in solid solution in γ-Al₂O₃ on its rate of conversion to α-Al₂O₃ at 1100°C was studied by X-ray diffraction. The δ form of Al₂O₃ was the principal intermediate phase produced from both pure γ-Al₂O₃ and that containing Fe³⁺ in solid solution, although addition of Fe greatly reduced crystallinity. Reflectance spectra and magnetic susceptibilities showed that Cr exists as Cr⁶⁺ in γ-Al₂O₃ and as Cr³⁺ in α-Al₂O₃, with θ-Al₂O₃ as the intermediate phase. The intermediates formed rapidly, and the rates of their conversion to α-Al₂O₃ were increased by 2 and 5 wt% additions of Fe and decreased by 2 and 4 wt% additions of Cr. An approximately linear relation observed between α-Al₂O₃ formation and decrease in specific surface area was only slightly affected by the added ions. This relation can be explained by a mechanism in which the sintering of δ- or θ-Al₂O₃, within the aggregates of their crystallites, is closely coupled with conversion of cubic to hexagonal close packing of O^2- ions by synchro-shear.     

Initial Sintering of α-Cr2O3

Since the difference between oxygen-ion and cation diffusion coefficients is greater for α-Cr₂O₃ than for α-Fe₂O₃ or α-Al₂O₃, a study of initial-sintering kinetics was undertaken to show unequivocally which species is rate controlling. Fine powders of α-Cr₂O₃, obtained by thermal decomposition of reagent-grade (NH₄)₂Cr₂O₇, were lightly compacted and their isothermal rates of shrinkage were determined between 1050° and 1300°C. Resultant data follow volume-diffusion sintering models, and calculated diffusion coefficients agree with, those measured for oxygen ions in α-Cr₂O₃. There is little evidence that oxygen diffusion along grain boundaries becomes so enhanced that chromium ions are left in control of the process.     

Formation and Transformation of Cubic ZrO2 Solid Solutions in the System ZrO2—Al2O3

In the system ZrO₂-Al₂O₃, cubic ZrO₂ solid solutions containing up to 40 mol% Al₂O₃ crystallize at low temperatures from amorphous materials prepared by the simultaneous hydrolysis of zirconium and aluminum alkoxides. The values of the lattice parameter, a, increase linearly from 0.5095 to 0.5129 nm with increasing Al₂O₃ content. At higher temperatures, the solid solutions transform into tetragonal ZrO₂ and α-Al₂O₃. Pure ZrO₂ crystallizes in the tetragonal form at 415° to 440°C.     

Formation and Transformation of TiO2 (Anatase) Solid Solution in the System TiO2—Al2O3

In the system TiO₂—Al₂O₃, TiO₂ (anatase, tetragonal) solid solutions crystallize at low temperatures (with up to ∼ 22 mol% Al₂O₃) from amorphous materials prepared by the simultaneous hydrolysis of titanium and aluminum alkoxides. The lattice parameter a is relatively constant regardless of composition, whereas parameter c decreases linearly with increasing Al₂O₃. At higher temperatures, anatase solid solutions transform into TiO₂ (rutile) with the formation of α-Al₂O₃. Powder characterization is studied. Pure anatase crystallizes at 220° to 360°C, and the anatase-to-rutile phase transformation occurs at 770° to 850°C.     

Studies in the System Li2O–Al2O3–Fe2O3-H2O

Subsolidus equilibrium relations in a portion of the system Li2O-Fe₂O₃-Al₂O3 in the temperature range 500° to 1400°C. have been determined near po₂ = 0.21. Of particular interest in this system is the LiFe₅O₈-LiAl₅O₈ join, which shows complete solid solution above 1180°C. Below this temperature the solid solution exsolves into two spinel phases. At 600°C. approximately 15 mole % of each compound is soluble in the other. The high-temperature solid solution and the low-temperature exsolution dome extend into the ternary system from the 1:5 join. There is no appreciable crystalline solubility of LiFeO₂ or of α-Fe₂O₃ in LiFe₅O₈. An attempt to confirm HFe₅O₈ as the correct formulation of the magnetic ferric oxide "γ-Fe₂O₃" was inconclusive, but in the absence of positive evidence, the retention of γ-Fe₂O₃ is recommended. All the metallic oxides of the Group IV elements increase the temperature of the monotropic conversion of -γ-Fe₂O₃ to α-Fe₂O₃. Silica and thoria have a greater effect on this conversion than does titania or zirconia.