A new macroinitiator for the synthesis of triblock copolymers PA12‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PA12

A new PDMS macroinitiator is proposed for the anionic ring‐opening polymerization of lactams. This α,ω‐dicarbamoyloxy caprolactam PDMS macroinitiator was readily obtained in quantitative yield, by an original synthesis scheme in two steps, which involved the scarcely reported reaction of isocyanates with silanol groups. It was then shown that this bifunctional macroinitiator enabled to synthesize triblock copolymers PA12‐b‐PDMS‐b‐PA12 by polymerization of lauryl lactam (LL) at high temperature (200°C) in inert atmosphere under conditions compatible with reactive extrusion processes. Another related high molar weight α,ω‐diacyllactam PDMS macroinitiator was also successfully used in the polymerization of LL under the same conditions, therefore overcoming the limitations formerly reported for this type of macroinitiators during the polymerization ε‐caprolactam (ε‐CL) at a much lower temperature (80°C). Triblock copolymers with a wide range of PA12 /molar weights (M_n: ～ 10,800–250,000 Da) were eventually obtained by using both types of macroinitiators. DMTA and DSC analyses showed that their thermal properties were strongly dependent upon their respective contents in soft and hard blocks. Such triblock copolymers already appear very promising for the highly effective in situ compatibilization of PA12/PDMS blends as shown by recent complementary results obtained in our laboratory. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl PolymSci 102: 2818–2831, 2006     

A novel approach to the preparation of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer and polyamide 6 blends by in situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactam

Blends of thermoplastic polyether‐based urethane elastomer (TPEU) and monomer casting polyamide 6 (MCPA6) were prepared using ε‐caprolactam as reactive solvent, with caprolactam sodium as a catalyst in the presence of TPEU, with TPEU content varying from 2.5% to 10% by weight. In situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization and in situ compatibilization to prepare TPEU/MCPA6 blends were carried out in one step. The TPEU chains, which underwent thermal dissociation in amine solvents to bear isocyanate groups, acted as macroactivator to initiate MCPA6 chain growth from the TPEU chains and form graft copolymers of TPEU‐co‐MCPA6 to improve compatibility between TPEU and MCPA6. The structure and thermal properties were characterized by means of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscopy. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) with polyamide and with polyolefin by using poly(lauryllactam‐random‐caprolactam‐block‐caprolactone)

The compatibilization of various poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends was investigated. The blend systems were PVC‐polyamide 12 (PA12), PVC‐polypropylene (PP), and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM) with a new compatibilizing agent, random‐block terpolymer poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) or systems containing these copolymers. The results were compared to those obtained in previous studies using poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) copolymer. The new block copolymer was specially synthesized by reactive extrusion. Observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that compatibilized blends had a finer morphology than the noncompatibilized blends. Addition of 10 weight percent (wt%) of block copolymer proved to be sufficient to give a significant improvement of the mechanical properties of the immiscible PVC blends at room temperature and at high temperatures that were above the glass transition temperature of PVC. For polyolefins, a three‐component compatibilizing system including maleated polypropylene, polyamide 12, and block copolymer was used. It was found that poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) was the more efficient compatibilizing agent for the modification of PVC‐polyamide 12, PVC‐polypropylene, and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber blends. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL., 11:95–110, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Kinetics of the in situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization of poly(propylene) and polyamide 6 blends

In previous articles, we reported on a novel reactive extrusion process to obtain a compatibilized blend of polymer A and polymer B. It consisted in polymerizing the monomer of polymer A in the presence of polymer B. A fraction of the latter contained initiating sites from which the polymerization of monomer A took place. As such, both polymer A and a graft copolymer of polymer A and polymer B were formed in the process. That process was called in situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization of polymer blends. Its feasibility was illustrated for in situ polymerized and in situ compatibilized poly(propylene) and polyamide 6 (PP/PA6) blends. The latter were prepared by activated anionic polymerization of ?‐caprolactam (CL) in the presence of PP in a batch mixer and a twin‐screw extruder, respectively. A fraction of the PP contained isocyanate groups from which PA6 grafts were formed. Sodium caprolactam (NaCL) was used as the catalyst and a diisocyanate compound was used as the activator. In this study, we report on the effects of various parameters on the kinetics of the anionic polymerization of CL in the presence of PP. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 91: 1498–1504, 2004     

Morphology and thermal behavior of MCPA6/SAN blends prepared by anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ϵ‐caprolactam

In this article, a series of blends of monomer casting polyamide 6 and styrene‐co‐acrylonitrile (MCPA6/SAN) were prepared by in situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ?‐caprolactam. Their morphology and thermal behaviors were investigated by means of scanning electron microscope, differential scanning calorimeter, and wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD), respectively. The SAN phase had much finer domain in MCPA6/SAN than that in the PA6/SAN blends prepared by melt blending of PA6 and SAN. All the melting and crystallization parameters of MCPA6/SAN blends decreased gradually with the increase of SAN content, while the melting temperature was almost unchanged. These results were due to the hydrolysis reaction of SAN that occurred during the anionic polymerization of ?‐caprolactam. In addition, WAXD results showed that only α crystal forms existed in the MCPA6/SAN blends. In addition, the mechanical property of MCPA6 was improved obviously by incorporating a certain amount of SAN. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 100: 1357–1363, 2006     

Structure and properties of polyimide‐g‐nylon 6 and nylon 6‐b‐polyimide‐b‐nylon 6 copolymers

Polyimide‐g‐nylon 6 copolymers were prepared by the polymerization of phenyl 3,5‐diaminobenzoate with several diamines and dianhydrides with a one‐step method. The polyimides containing pendant ester moieties were then used as activators for the anionic polymerization of molten ε‐caprolactam. Nylon 6‐b‐polyimide‐b‐nylon 6 copolymers were prepared by the use of phenyl 4‐aminobenzoate as an end‐capping agent in the preparation of a series of imide oligomers. The oligomers were then used to activate the anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam. In both the graft and copolymer syntheses, the phenyl ester groups reacted quickly with caprolactam anions at 120°C to generate N‐acyllactam moieties, which activated the anionic polymerization. All the block copolymers had higher moduli and tensile strengths than those of nylon 6. However, their elongations at break were much lower. The graft copolymers based on 2,2′‐bis[4‐(3,4‐dicarboxyphenoxy)phenyl]propane dianhydride and 2,2′‐bis[4‐(4‐aminophenoxy)phenyl]propane displayed elongations comparable to that of nylon 6 and the highest moduli and tensile strengths of all the copolymers. The thermal stability, moisture resistance, and impact strength were dramatically increased by the incorporation of only 5 wt % polyimide into both the graft and block copolymers. The graft and block copolymers also exhibited improved melt processability. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 99: 300–308, 2006     

Tough polyamide 6/core–shell blends prepared via in situ anionic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam by reactive extrusion

In this study, the molten ε‐caprolactam (CL) solution of maleated styrene‐ethylene/butylene‐styrene block copolymer (SEBS‐g‐MA) and polystyrene (PS) containing catalyst and activator were introduced into a twin screw extruder, and polyamide 6 (PA6)/SEBS/PS blends were successfully prepared via anionic polymerization of CL by reactive extrusion. The mechanical properties measurements indicated that both the elongation at break and notched Izod impact strength of PA6/SEBS/PS (85/10/5) blends were improved distinctly with slight loss of tensile and flexural strength as compared to that of pure PA6. The images of transmission electron microscopy showed that a core–shell structure with PS core and poly (ethene‐co‐1‐butene) (PEB) shell was formed within the PA6 matrix. Fourier transform infrared was used to investigate the formation mechanisms of the core–shell structure. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 53:2705–2710, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Toughening and compatibilization of polyphenylene sulfide/nylon 66 blends with SEBS and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS triblock copolymers

In this study, styrene‐b‐ethylene/butylene‐b‐styrene triblock copolymer (SEBS) and maleic anhydride grafted SEBS (SEBS‐g‐MA) were used as compatibilizers for the blends of polyphenylene sulfide/nylon 66 (PPS/PA66). The mechanical properties, including impact and tensile properties and morphology of the blends, were investigated by mechanical properties measurements and scanning electron microscopy. Impact measurements indicated that the impact strength of the blends increases slowly with elastomer (SEBS and SEBS‐g‐MA) content upto 20 wt %; thereafter, it increases sharply with increasing elastomer content. The impact energy of the elastomer‐compatibilized PPS/PA66 blends exceeded that of pure nylon 66, implying that the nylon 66 can be further toughened by the incorporation of brittle PPS minor phase in the presence of SEBS or SEBS‐g‐MA. The compatibilization efficiency of SEBS‐g‐MA for nylon‐rich PPS/PA66 was found to be higher than SEBS due to the in situ forming SEBS interphase between PPS and nylon 66. The correlation between the impact property and morphology of the SEBS‐g‐MA compatibilized PPS/PA66 blends is discussed. The excellent impact strength of the nylon‐rich blends resulted from shield yielding of the matrix. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Effect of in situ synthesized macroactivator on morphology of PA6/PS blends via successive polymerization

In situ polymerization and in situ compatibilization was adopted for preparation of ternary PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends by means of successive polymerization of styrene, with TMI and ε‐caprolactam, via free radical copolymerization and anionic ring‐opening polymerization, respectively. Copolymer poly(St‐g‐TMI), the chain of which bears isocyanate (? NCO), acts as a macroactivator to initiate PA6 chain growth from the PS chain and graft copolymer of PS‐g‐PA6 and pure PA6 form, simultaneously. The effect of the macroactivator poly(St‐g‐TMI) on the phase morphology was investigated in detail, using scanning electron microscopy. In case of blends with higher content of PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer, copolymer nanoparticles coexisting with the PS formed the matrix, in which PA6 microspheres were dispersed evenly as minor phase. The content of the compositions (homopolystyrene, homopolyamide 6, and PS‐g‐PA6) of the blends were determined by selective solvent extraction technique. The mechanical properties of PA6/PS‐g‐PA6/PS blends were better than that of PA6/PS blends. Especially for the blends T10 with lower PS‐g‐PA6 copolymer content, both the flexural strength and flexural modulus showed significantly improving because of the improved interfacial adhesion between PS and PA6. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

In situ compatibilization of PET/PS blends through reactive copolymers

Polymer blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polystyrene (PS) are immiscible and incompatible, which has been well recognized. Styrene–glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymer has been synthesized by suspension polymerization and employed in this study as an in situ compatibilizer for the polyblends of PET and PS. This copolymer contains reactive epoxy functional groups that are able to react with PET end groups ? OH and ? COOH) under melt conditions to from SG-graft-PET copolymer. The presence of a small amount of phosphonium catalyst (200 ppm) accelerated the graft reaction and results in a better compatibilized blend. The compatibilized PET/PS blend has a smaller phase domain and higher viscosity than does the corresponding noncompatibilized blend. Mechanical properties of the compatibilized blends have also been improved significantly over the corresponding noncompatibilized blends. © 1993 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Effect of compatibilizer in acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene toughened nylon 6 blends: Ductile–brittle transition temperature

The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were determined for compatibilized nylon 6/acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene (PA6/ABS) copolymer blends. The compatibilizers used for those blends were methyl methacrylate‐co‐maleic anhydride (MMA‐MAH) and MMA‐co‐glycidyl methacrylate (MMA‐GMA). The ductile–brittle transition temperatures were found to be lower for blends compatibilized through maleate modified acrylic polymers. At room temperature, the PA6/ABS binary blend was essentially brittle whereas the ternary blends with MMA‐MAH compatibilizer were supertough and showed a ductile–brittle transition temperature at ?10°C. The blends compatibilized with maleated copolymer exhibited impact strengths of up to 800 J/m. However, the blends compatibilized with MMA‐GMA showed poor toughness at room temperature and failed in a brittle manner at subambient temperatures. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 2643–2647, 2003     

Influence of in situ compatibilization on in situ formation of low‐density polyethylene/polyamide 6 blends by reactive extrusion

Low‐density polyethylene/polyamide 6 (LDPE/PA6) blends were in situ formed by reactive extrusion, in which in situ polymerization of ε‐caprolactam (CL) and in situ copolymerization of maleic anhydride grafted low‐density polyethylene (LDPE‐MA) and CL took place simultaneously. The latter reaction could be considered as in situ compatibilization, and the influence of in situ compatibilization on the morphologies, thermal properties, and rheological behaviors of the blends was investigated in this work. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the in situ compatibilization could dramatically reduce the dispersed phase sizes and narrow the size distribution. The thermal properties indicated that in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) cooling scans, fractionated crystallization of the PA6 component was observed in all cases and was promoted with increasing the amount of LDPE‐MA. The DSC second heating scans showed the in situ compatibilization could stimulate the formation of the less stable γ‐crystalline form of PA6 in the blends. Dynamic rheological experiments revealed the in situ compatibilization had enhanced the viscosity, storage modulus, and loss modulus of the blend and reduce the corresponding slope values of the storage modulus and loss modulus. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer and polyamide 6 blends by in situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization of ϵ‐caprolactam

The blends of thermoplastic polyether‐based urethane elastomer (TPEU) and monomer casting polyamide 6 (MCPA6) were prepared using ε‐caprolactam (CL) as a reactive solvent, and CL sodium as a catalyst at various TPEU contents (2.5–15 phr by weight). In situ anionic ring‐opening polymerization and in situ compatibilization of TPEU/MCPA6 blends were realized in one step. The dissociated TPEU chains acted as macroactivator to initiate MCPA6 chain growth from the TPEU chains. The formed block copolymers (TPEU‐co‐MCPA6), which have been confirmed by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and ¹H‐NMR analysis, improved the compatibility between TPEU and MCPA6. In addition, both differential scanning calorimetry and dynamic mechanical analysis studies revealed that the crystallinity temperature, melting temperature, the degree of crystallization, and the glass‐transition temperature of MCPA6 component remarkably shifted to a low temperature with increasing TPEU content. Mechanical properties demonstrated that the impact strength and the elongation‐at‐break of the blends significantly increased with the content of TPEU, whereas a progressive decrease occurred in tensile strength, flexural strength, and flexural modulus. WAXD spectra showed that only α‐form crystal of PA6 component existed in the TPEU/MCPA6 blends. Furthermore, scanning electron microscopes (SEM) of the cryo‐fractured surfaces confirmed a substantially improved compatibility, and reflected a seemly single‐phase morphology. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46: 1196–1203, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Novel polyethylene‐b‐polyurethane‐b‐polyethylene triblock copolymers: Facile synthesis and application

A series of novel polyethylene‐b‐polyurethane‐b‐polyethylene (EUE) triblock copolymers is successfully prepared through a facile route combining the thiol‐ene chemistry, addition polymerization, and coupling reaction. The resulting EUE triblock copolymers are characterized by Nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H NMR), Fourier transform‐infrared spectra (FT‐IR), High temperature gel permeation chromatography (HT‐GPC), Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), and Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, the EUE triblock copolymers have been evaluated as compatibilizers in the polymer blends of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer (TPU) and high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The SEM results show that the compatibility of immiscible blends is enhanced greatly after the addition of EUE triblock copolymers. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016 , 133, 42967.     

Tracer‐compatibilizer: Synthesis and applications in polymer blending processes

This article reports on a route to synthesizing fluorescent labeled graft copolymers, on the one hand; and on a concept of tracer‐compatibilizer for facile build‐up of emulsification curves of polymer blends, on the other hand. For these purposes, blends composed of polystyrene (PS) and polyamide 6 (PA6) are chosen. The synthesis of the corresponding tracer‐compatibilizer consists of three steps: (1) copolymerization of styrene with 3‐isopropenyl‐α,α'‐dimethybenzyl isocyanate (TMI); (2) conversion of a fraction of the isocyanate moieties of the resulting copolymer into anthracene ones upon reacting with 9‐(methylamino‐methyl)anthracene (MAMA); and (3) polymerization of ε‐caprolactam (CL) from the remaining isocyanate moieties. The resulting fluorescent labeled graft copolymer, denoted as PS‐g‐PA6‐Ant, is used to build up emulsification curves of PS/PA6 blends in a twin screw extruder (TSE), showing great usefulness of the concept of tracer‐compatibilizer. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 2012. © 2011 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Properties of anionic polymerized ε‐caprolactam in the presence of carbon nanotubes

The results of the investigations of the relations between structure, physical and usage properties of polyamide 6 (PA6) reinforced with multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWNTs) are presented. A method of in situ anionic bulk polymerization of ε‐caprolactam in the presence of MWNTs was used for the preparation of reinforced PA6. The polymerization product was crushed, and the pellets of PA6 and PA6/MWNTs composites were injection molded to produce the standard test specimens for various measurements. The surface morphology (SEM), thermal (DSC, TGA, DMTA), and mechanical properties (tensile strength, Charpy's notched impact strength) of these materials were examined. Some differences between our specimens and those obtained by hydrolytic polymerization of ε‐caprolactam (CL) were found. It was found that a small amount of carbon nanotube decreases the crystallinity degree of PA6 matrix in the composites. The thermal stability was higher than that for neat PA6. DMTA results showed that the magnitudes of the storage modulus are higher for the PA6/MWNTs composites than for the unmodified PA6 in the temperature range between ?90 and 200°C. The tensile strength and tensile modulus are higher compared with the neat PA6. The elongation at break showed no noticeable change in the range of MWNTs loading considered, while the Charpy's notched impact strength slightly decreased. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

Rheological,thermal, and morphological properties of ABS–PA1010 blends

Noncompatibilized and compatibilized ABS–nylon1010 blends were prepared by melt mixing. Polystyrene and glycidyl methacrylate (SG) copolymer was used as a compatibilizer to enhance the interfacial adhesion and to control the morphology. This SG copolymer contains reactive glycidyl groups that are able to react with PA1010 end groups ( NH₂ or  COOH) under melt conditions to form SG‐g‐Nylon copolymer. Effects of the compatibilizer SG on the rheological, thermal, and morphological properties were investigated by capillary rheometer, DSC, and SEM techniques. The compatibilized ABS–PA1010 blend has higher viscosity, lower crystallinity, and smaller phase domain compared to the corresponding noncompatibilized blend. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 72: 683–688, 1999     

Effect of mixing protocol on compatibilized polymer blend morphology

We investigated the effect of mixing protocol on the morphology of compatibilized polymer blends made with premade compatibilizer and reactively formed in‐situ compatibilizer in a custom‐built miniature mixer Alberta Polymer Asymmetric Minimixer (APAM). The compatibilized blends show a finer morphology than uncompatibilized blends if the polymers are mixed together in the dry state and then fed into the mixer. It is found that premelting one polymer, and premixing polymers and compatibilizer, both greatly affect the compatibilized blends' morphology. The effects are complex since the dispersed phase particle size and distribution of the compatibilized blends may be smaller or larger when compared with the uncompatibilized system, depending on the material's physical and chemical properties; for example, diblock molecular weight or the preference of copolymer to migrate to a particular phase can change the final morphology. Good mobility of the copolymer to reach the interface is crucial to obtain a finer morphology. Micelles are observed when a high molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) is used for a PS/PMMA blend. Because of its enhanced mobility, no micelles are found for a low molecular weight diblock copolymer P(S‐b‐MMA) in a PS/PMMA blend. For PS/PE/P(S‐b‐E) blends, finer morphology is obtained when P(S‐b‐E) is first precompounded with PS. Because the block copolymer prefers the PE phase, if the P(S‐b‐E) block copolymer is compounded with PE first, some remains inside the PE phase and does not compatibilize the interface. In the case of reactive blend PSOX/PEMA, premelting and holding the polymers at high temperature for 5 min decreases final dispersed phase particle size; however, premelting and holding for 10 min coarsens the morphology. POLYM. ENG. SCI. 46:691–702, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers.     

Nanophase morphology and crystallization in poly(vinylidene fluoride)/polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene blends

An approach to achieve confined crystallization of ferroelectric semicrystalline poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) was investigated. A novel polydimethylsiloxane‐block‐poly(methyl methacrylate)‐block‐polystyrene (PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS) triblock copolymer was synthesized by the atom‐transfer radical polymerization method and blended with PVDF. Miscibility, crystallization and morphology of the PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends were studied within the whole range of concentration. In this A‐b‐B‐b‐C/D type of triblock copolymer/homopolymer system, crystallizable PVDF (D) and PMMA (B) middle block are miscible because of specific intermolecular interactions while A block (PDMS) and C block (PS) are immiscible with PVDF. Nanostructured morphology is formed via self‐assembly, displaying a variety of phase structures and semicrystalline morphologies. Crystallization at 145 °C reveals that both α and β crystalline phases of PVDF are present in PVDF/PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS blends. Incorporation of the triblock copolymer decreases the degree of crystallization and enhances the proportion of β to α phase of semicrystalline PVDF. Introduction of PDMS‐b‐PMMA‐b‐PS triblock copolymer to PVDF makes the crystalline structures compact and confines the crystal size. Moreover, small‐angle X‐ray scattering results indicate that the immiscible PDMS as a soft block and PS as a hard block are localized in PVDF crystalline structures. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry     

AB‐ and ABC‐type di‐ and triblock copolymers of poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)] and poly[styrene‐block‐(ε‐caprolactone)‐block‐lactide]: synthesis,characterization and thermal studies

Polystyrene terminated with benzyl alcohol units was employed as a macroinitiator for ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone and L ‐lactide to yield AB‐ and ABC‐type block copolymers. Even though there are many reports on the diblock copolymers of poly(styrene‐block‐lactide) and poly(styrene‐block‐lactone), this is the first report on the poly(styrene‐block‐lactone‐block‐lactide) triblock copolymer consisting of two semicrystalline and degradable segments. The triblock copolymers exhibited twin melting behavior in differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis with thermal transitions corresponding to each of the lactone and lactide blocks. The block derived from ε‐caprolactone also showed crystallization transitions upon cooling from the melt. In the DSC analysis, one of the triblock copolymers showed an exothermic transition well above the melting temperature upon cooling. Thermogravimetric analysis of these block copolymers showed a two‐step degradation curve for the diblock copolymer and a three‐step degradation for the triblock copolymer with each of the degradation steps associated with each segment of the block copolymers. The present study shows that it is possible to make pure triblock copolymers with two semicrystalline segments which also consist of degradable blocks. Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry