Influences of copolymerization conditions on the structure and properties of isotactic polypropylene/ethylene–propylene random copolymer in situ blends

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of in situ isotactic polypropylene/ethylene–propylene random copolymer blends by propylene bulk polymerization and subsequent gas‐phase copolymerization of ethylene with propylene. Different copolymerization conditions, such as the reaction time, monomer pressure, and composition, were investigated, and their influences on the structure and properties of the products were studied. Raising the monomer pressure was the most effective way of speeding up the copolymerization, but it caused more increases in the random copolymer than the block copolymer fractions. Increasing the ethylene content of the monomer feed also resulted in higher reaction rates and copolymer contents, but the ethylene contents of both the random and block copolymer fractions were also raised. In situ blends that contain more than 50 wt % copolymer were prepared. The mechanical properties of the blends, including the impact strength and flexural modulus, were regulated in a rather broad range with changes in the copolymerization conditions. The properties were highly dependent on the amount, distribution, and chain structure of the copolymer fractions. The impact strength was influenced by both the random copolymer and block copolymer portions in a complicated way, whereas the flexural modulus was mainly determined by the amount of random copolymer. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 84: 445–453, 2002; DOI 10.1002/app.10415     

Study of crystallization and melting behavior of polypropylene‐block‐polyethylenes copolymers fractionated from polypropylene and polyethylene mixtures

A series of ethylene–propylene block copolymer fractions of differing compositions, while still retaining broad molecular weight distributions, were obtained by fractionation of polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) copolymers prepared by sequential polymerization of ethylene and propylene. The crystallization and melting behavior of the polypropylene‐block‐polyethylene fractions were studied. It was observed that the major component could suppress crystallization of the minor component, leading to a decrease in crystallinity and melting temperature. Non‐isothermal crystallization showed that crystallization of the ethylene block was less influenced by composition and cooling rate than the propylene block. At fast cooling rates, the ethylene block could crystallize prior to the propylene block. Isothermal crystallization kinetics experiments were also conducted. We found that the block copolymers with minor ethylene components had smaller Avrami exponents (n ≈ 1.0), hence indicating a reduced growth dimension of the PE crystals by the pre‐existing PP crystals. On the other hand, the ethylene block exhibited much larger Avrami exponents in those block copolymers with major ethylene contents. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry     

Structural characterization of reactor blends of polypropylene and ethylene‐propylene rubber

Blends of isotactic polypropylene (PP), ethylene‐propylene rubber copolymer (EPR), and ethylene‐propylene crystalline copolymer (EPC) can be produced through in situ polymerization processes directly in the reactor and blends with different structure and composition can be obtained. In this work we studied the structure of five reactor‐made blends of PP, EPR, and EPC produced by a Ziegler‐Natta catalyst system. The composition of EPR was related to the ratio between ethylene and propylene used in the copolymerization step. The ethylene content in the EPR was in the range of 50–70 mol %. The crystallization behavior of PP and EPC in the blends was influenced by the presence of the rubber, and some specific interactions between the components could be established. By preparative temperature rising elution fractionation (P‐TREF) analysis, the isolation and characterization of crystalline EPC fractions were made. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 2155–2162, 2004     

Rheology,structure, and properties of ethylene–vinyl acetate/metallocene‐catalyzed ethylene–α‐olefin copolymer blends

The rheology, morphology, thermal, mechanical, and adhesive properties of blends containing ethylene–vinyl acetate and metallocene‐catalyzed ethylene–α‐olefin copolymers, containing butene and octene comonomers, were investigated. On the basis of the thermal and rheological properties and scanning electron microscopy observations, we deduced that these blends were immiscible, both in the solid and melt states over the whole range of compositions. Rheological properties were correlated to blend morphology with the Palierne emulsion model. The butene‐based blends had better mechanical properties, which was attributed to their finer morphology, lower interfacial tension, and better adhesive properties. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 94: 881–889, 2004     

Correlation of rheology and morphology and estimation of interfacial tension of immiscible COC/EVA blends

Rheology and morphology of cyclic olefin copolymer (COC) / ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer (EVA) immiscible blends with droplet and co-continuous morphologies were experimentally examined and theoretically analyzed using emulsion and micromechanical models. The blends showed an asymmetric phase diagram in which the EVA-rich blends had smaller dispersed size domains as compared to the COC-rich blends. This could be explained based on the higher melt elasticity and viscosity of COC as compared to EVA determined by the rheological investigations. The rheological tools were used to investigate the miscibility of the blends. From the melt viscosity data it is found that the COC/EVA blends show a positive deviation behavior at all compositions which is a hint for strong interaction between the COC and EVA. Analysis of Cole-Cole and Han diagrams revealed that COC/EVA blends, at high EVA contents, were more compatible than COC-rich blends. For the droplet morphology, Palierne model was more successful but, by increasing the dispersed phase content some deviation was observed. In the co-continuous region, the Coran model was in good correspondence with the experimental data as compared to the Veenstra’s model. The storage and loss modulus of EVA-rich blends had a better correspondence with the Palierne model than the COC-rich blends which further confirmed the morphological findings. Interfacial tension calculated for the COC/EVA blends using the Palierne model, were about 1.2 and 15 mN/m² for EVA-rich (10/90) and COC-rich blends (90/10), respectively. In both EVA-rich and COC-rich systems the interfacial tension increased with increasing the dispersed phase content.     

Rheological,mechanical and thermal properties of propylene‐ethylene block copolymer/polyalphaolefins blends

The rheological, thermal, and mechanical properties of propylene–ethylene block copolymer (PPB) blends with predominantly atactic molecular structure of low molecular weight polypropylene and propylene copolymers with either ethylene or 1‐butene (APAO) have been studied. It has been found that blend properties depend on comonomer type, content, and molecular weight of APAO as well as blend composition. APAO having ethylene comonomer showed better miscibility with PPB than the other ones, and high comonomer content of APAOs gave dramatic increase in impact strength over 30 wt%. It has been concluded that APAO can be used as an effective modifier of PPB. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:1905–1911, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Properties of a propylene-ethylene block copolymer

Although polypropylene has a unique combination of properties, its impact strength at low temperatures is sometimes insufficient. This need has been met by polypropylene/polyisobutylene blends. Today, polypropylene type copolymers (block copolymers) are available with low temperature toughness and property and processing advantages over the above blends. Ordinarily, copolymers from addition polymerization are random. In a block copolymer, the monomeric units of propylene are segregated from those of the second monomer. A block copolymer, propylene, low pressure polyethylene, ABS and polypropylene-polyisobutylene blends are compared as to general and mechanical properties, stress relaxation, stress rupture performance, low temperature performance (impact strength), high temperature performance (flexural stiffness) and processability. Not every material was used in each test. Block copolymers find applications in automotive and appliance industries, industrial parts and packages for cosmetics and food.     

Compatibilization of poly(vinyl chloride) with polyamide and with polyolefin by using poly(lauryllactam‐random‐caprolactam‐block‐caprolactone)

The compatibilization of various poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) blends was investigated. The blend systems were PVC‐polyamide 12 (PA12), PVC‐polypropylene (PP), and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber (EPDM) with a new compatibilizing agent, random‐block terpolymer poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) or systems containing these copolymers. The results were compared to those obtained in previous studies using poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) copolymer. The new block copolymer was specially synthesized by reactive extrusion. Observation by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that compatibilized blends had a finer morphology than the noncompatibilized blends. Addition of 10 weight percent (wt%) of block copolymer proved to be sufficient to give a significant improvement of the mechanical properties of the immiscible PVC blends at room temperature and at high temperatures that were above the glass transition temperature of PVC. For polyolefins, a three‐component compatibilizing system including maleated polypropylene, polyamide 12, and block copolymer was used. It was found that poly(ω‐lauryllactam‐random‐?‐caprolactam‐block‐?‐caprolactone) was the more efficient compatibilizing agent for the modification of PVC‐polyamide 12, PVC‐polypropylene, and PVC‐ethylene‐propylene‐diene rubber blends. J. VINYL. ADDIT. TECHNOL., 11:95–110, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Characterization of phase morphology of polymer melts (PP/PE blends) via rheology

The viscoelastic behavior of high impact polypropylene (PP) melts, a multiphase system with an isotactic PP matrix and inclusions consisting of mainly amorphous ethylene–propylene copolymer (EP), is strongly influenced by the size of small inclusions. The dynamic moduli of such two‐phase systems (reactor products) are well described by Palierne's emulsion model. For this analysis the reactor product is separated into matrix and dispersed phase via the different solubility in xylene. This analysis also provides information on the ratio interfacial tension to particle size of the dispersed phase. With morphology data (particle size) of the solidified heterophasic samples (Transmission Electron Microscopy), we estimate the interfacial tension between PP and EP copolymer via the emulsion model of Palierne and from the relaxation time spectra according to Gramespacher and Meissner. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 2007     

The measurement of compositional heterogeneity in a propylene–ethylene block copolymer

¹³C nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) and Fourier transform infra-red (FTi.r.) spectroscopies, as well as wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), differential scanning calorimetry (d.s.c.) and temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF), have been combined to measure the composional heterogeneity of a commercial propylene–ethylene block copolymer. It has been shown that the copolymer contains molecular species with a wide variation in composition, and the copolymer products range from amorphous ethylene–propylene rubbers (EPR) to crystallisable propylene–ethylene statistical copolymers, polyethylene and polypropylene homopolymers as well as blocks of various lengths. The so-called block copolymer was composed of about 15% amorphous EPR, 5% random copolymer, 28% block copolymers with long propylene and long ethylene sequences, and 52% homopolypropylene. The crystallisation and melting behaviour of these fractions have been investigated.     

Chain structure and mechanical properties of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene)in‐reactor alloys synthesized with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst by gas‐phase polymerization

Two polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloy samples with a good polymer particle morphology were synthesized by sequential multistage gas‐phase polymerization with a spherical Ziegler–Natta catalyst. The alloys showed excellent mechanical properties, including both toughness and stiffness. With temperature‐gradient extraction fractionation, both alloys were fractionated into five fractions. The chain structures of the fractions were studied with Fourier transform infrared, ¹³C‐NMR, and thermal analysis. The alloys were mainly composed of polyethylene, polyethylene‐b‐polypropylene block copolymer, and polypropylene. There also were minor amounts of an ethylene–propylene segmented copolymer with very low crystallinity and an ethylene–propylene random copolymer. The block copolymer fraction accounted for more than 44 wt % of the alloys. The coexistence of these components with different structures was apparently the key factor resulting in the excellent toughness–stiffness balance of the materials. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 640–647, 2005     

乙丙嵌段共聚物相对分子质量及链结构对PP/EPR共混体系结构与性能的影响

设计合成了一系列不同相对分子质量和乙烯平均序列长度的乙丙嵌段共聚物（EP）,并将其作为聚丙烯（PP）/二元乙丙橡胶（EPR）共混体系的增容剂,考察了EP用量、相对分子质量及乙烯平均序列长度对共混体系性能及分散相形态演变的影响。结果表明,EP增容PP/EPR体系时存在最佳添加量,少量EP的加入可有效提高PP/EPR共混体系的抗冲击性能,并对分散相尺寸及形态起到良好的调控作用;同时,EP的相对分子质量越大对共混体系的冲击性能提高越明显,EP的组成与EPR越接近,对共混体系的增容效果越明显。     

Effect of Mono- and Multichlorinated Organic Compounds—Chlorocyclohexane and Hexachloro-p-xylene—On the Catalytic Properties of Titanium–Magnesium Catalysts in the Homo- and Copolymerization of Ethylene with 1-Hexene

Ethylene polymerization and ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization over the titanium–magnesium catalytic system in the presence of chlorocyclohexane (CHC) and hexachloro-p-xylene (HCPX) has been studied. Modification of TMC with chlorocyclohexane and hexachloro-p-xylene increased catalyst activity severalfold for both ethylene polymerization and ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization. The key kinetic regularities of ethylene homopolymerization and ethylene/1-hexene copolymerization in the presence of CHC and HCPX were determined, and the copolymerization constants were measured. Molecular characteristics and the copolymer composition were determined for the synthesized samples of ethylene homopolymers and ethylene/hexene copolymers. Modification of the titanium–magnesium catalyst with chlorinated organic compounds reduced 1-hexene content in the copolymer; polymerization was sensitive to 1-hexene as a regulator of polymer molecular weight. The potential mode of action of chlorinated organic modifiers on catalytic properties of titanium–magnesium catalyst is discussed.     

Synthesis of ethylene/1‐octene copolymers with controlled block structures by semibatch living copolymerization

A kinetic model was developed for the living copolymerization of ethylene/1‐octene using the fluorinated FI‐Ti catalyst system, bis[N‐(3‐methylsalicylidene)‐2,3,4,5,6‐pentafluoroanilinato] TiCl₂/dried methylaluminoxane is presented. The model was first validated by batch polymerization experiments. Kinetic parameters were estimated from the model correlations with online ethylene consumption rates and end‐of‐batch copolymer molecular weight. The model was then used to calculate the microstructural properties of ethylene/1‐octene copolymers with controlled composition profiles (uniform, diblock, and step triblock), which were synthesized using sequential comonomer feeding policies in semibatch copolymerization. The synthesized block copolymers had the exact composition distributions and molecular weights as the model simulated. It was demonstrated that the polymer chain microstructure in the living copolymerization of olefins could be precisely regulated by using semibatch comonomer feeding policies. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 4686–4695, 2013     

Comparison of olefin copolymers as compatibilizers for polypropylene and high‐density polyethylene

Some polyolefin elastomers were compared as compatibilizers for blends of polypropylene (PP) with 30 wt % high‐density polyethylene (HDPE). The compatibilizers included a multiblock ethylene–octene copolymer (OBC), two statistical ethylene–octene copolymers (EO), two propylene–ethylene copolymers (P/E), and a styrenic block copolymer (SBC). Examination of the blend morphology by AFM showed that the compatibilizer was preferentially located at the interface between the PP matrix and the dispersed HDPE particles. The brittle‐to‐ductile (BD) transition was determined from the temperature dependence of the blend toughness, which was taken as the area under the stress–strain curve. All the compatibilized blends had lower BD temperature than PP. However, the blend compatibilized with OBC had the best combination of low BD temperature and high toughness. Examination of the deformed blends by scanning electron microscopy revealed that in the best blends, the compatibilizer provided sufficient interfacial adhesion so that the HDPE domains were able to yield and draw along with the PP matrix. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Synthesis of polypropylene graft copolymers from a hydroxyl‐groups‐containing polypropylene precursor via atom‐transfer radical polymerization

Isotactic polypropylene graft copolymers, isotactic[polypropylene‐graft‐poly(methyl methacrylate)] (i‐PP‐g‐PMMA) and isotactic[polypropylene‐graft‐polystyrene] (i‐PP‐g‐PS), were prepared by atom‐transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) using a 2‐bromopropionic ester macro‐initiator from functional polypropylene‐containing hydroxyl groups. This kind of functionalized propylene can be obtained by copolymerization of propylene and borane monomer using isospecific MgCl₂‐supported TiCl₄ as catalyst. Both the graft density and the molecular weights of i‐PP‐based graft copolymers were controlled by changing the hydroxyl group contents of functionalized polypropylene and the amount of monomer used in the grafting reaction. The effect of i‐PP‐g‐PS graft copolymer on PP‐PS blends and that of i‐PP‐g‐PMMA graft copolymer on PP‐PMMA blends were studied by scanning electron microscopy. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical Industry     

Influence of copolymerization conditions on the structure and properties of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys synthesized in gas‐phase with spherical ziegler‐natta catalyst

A spherical TiCl₄/MgCl₂‐based catalyst was used in the synthesis of polyethylene/polypropylene/poly (ethylene‐co‐propylene) in‐reactor alloys by sequential homopolymerization of ethylene, homopolymerization of propylene, and copolymerization of ethylene and propylene in gas‐phase. Different conditions in the third stage, such as the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture and the feed ratio of ethylene, were investigated, and their influences on the compositions, structural distribution and properties of the in‐reactor alloys were studied. Increasing the feed ratio of ethylene is favorable for forming random ethylene–propylene copolymer and segmented ethylene–propylene copolymer, however, slightly influences the formation of ethylene‐b‐propylene block copolymer and homopolyethylene. Raising the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture results in the increment of segmented ethylene–propylene copolymer, ethylene‐b‐propylene block copolymer, and PE fractions, but exerts a slight influence on both the random copolymer and PP fractions. The impact strength of PE/PP/EPR in‐reactor alloys can be markedly improved by increasing the feed ratio of ethylene in the ethylene–propylene mixture or increasing the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture. However, the flexural modulus decreases as the feed ratio of ethylene in the ethylene–propylene mixture or the pressure of ethylene–propylene mixture increases. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 102: 2481–2487, 2006     

Characterization and properties of polypropylene‐block‐poly(ethylene‐co‐propylene) synthesized by short‐period polymerization

The morphology and mechanical properties of novel block copolymers consisting of isotactic polypropylene (PP) and ethylene–propylene rubber (EPR) synthesized by a short‐period polymerization method were examined using differential scanning calorimetry, atomic force microscopy, dynamic mechanical analysis, and a rheooptical technique. It was found that the novel block copolymers show a single glass transition and EPR segments are trapped into the amorphous region of PP. Furthermore, the rheooptical analysis demonstrates that a drawing process of the EPR‐rich block copolymer induces orientation of the PP lamellae in the EPR matrix. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 74: 958–964, 1999     

PP/PE blends. IV. Characterization and compatibilization of blends of postconsumer resin with virgin PP and HDPE

The mechanical properties of blends of isotactic polypropylene and high-density polyethylene with a postconsumer resin (recycled dairy containers) were investigated over the entire composition range. Modification of these blends with an ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer or an ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymer was also investigated. Isotactic polypropylene/postconsumer resin blends have satisfactory impact and tensile properties at postconsumer resin contents of less than 50% for certain applications. At higher postconsumer resin contents, the tensile properties were adversely affected. The impact properties remained satisfactory. Addition of an ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer improved the mechanical properties of these blends to levels equal to or greater than those for neat isotactic polypropylene. Ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers were also able to improve the mechanical properties, but not as efficiently as did the ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer. Blends of high-density polyethylene and a postconsumer resin had poor impact and tensile properties. Although the ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer and ethylene/vinyl acetate copolymers were able to improve these properties, the improvement was insufficient for general recycling, except at lower (≤25%) postconsumer resin contents. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 70: 2081–2095, 1998     

星状羟基功能化聚苯乙烯/聚乙烯两嵌段共聚物的合成

采用CpTiCl3/I4/Zn催化体系引发苯乙烯活性自由基聚合,之后引入乙烯,以MAO为助催化剂催化乙烯配位聚合,合成无规聚苯乙烯-聚乙烯嵌段共聚物aPS-b-PE。考察了聚合温度、时间、乙烯压力和Al/Ti摩尔比等反应条件对共聚合的影响。使用氯仿对共聚物进行抽提,采用GPC、DSC和 13C NMR对氯仿可溶部分的结构和性能进行了表征。DSC结果显示,共聚物的玻璃化转变温度Tg为86 ℃,属于无规聚苯乙烯相玻璃化转变温度,熔点Tm为112 ℃,属于聚乙烯相的熔点。13C NMR结果证明聚苯乙烯链段为无定形态。这些表征结果表明星状羟基功能化aPS-b-PE共聚物是嵌段结构。