Usefulness of the intubating laryngeal mask airway for cases with predicted difficult intubation

We evaluated the usefulness of the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients who were predicted to have possible difficult airway. Patients with possible difficult airway were defined as those with limited head extension, Mallampati's classification of grade IV, thyro-mental distance < 4 cm, or Cormack grade III-IV on the laryngoscopy. The control group was consisted of the patients without these conditions or impaired mouth opening. Insertion of the ILMA was successfully performed in all patients of both groups. In the group of possible difficult airway, 83% of patients were intubated through the ILMA successfully, and in the control group, 86%. We conclude that the ILMA may become an additional tool in patients with difficult intubation.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA): initial experience in Singapore

We have evaluated the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) for ventilation and for blind tracheal intubation. After induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl 1 microgram kg-1 and propofol 3 ml kg-1, the ILMA was placed successfully on the first attempt in all 100 patients. After administration of atracurium 0.5 mg kg-1, blind tracheal intubation was successful in 97% of patients--50% on the first attempt, 42% on the second and 5% on the third. Success was improved by pulling the metal handle of the ILMA towards the intubator in an "extension" manoeuvre, if intubation was not possible on the first attempt. These findings confirm the effectiveness of the ILMA in an Asian population.     

The intubating laryngeal mask airway: an initial assessment of performance

A new prototype of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA), the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA), was used to facilitate tracheal intubation in 100 fasted patients presenting for elective surgery. Alignment of the ILMA with the larynx was assessed fibreoptically before intubation without the investigator performing the intubation being aware of the view score. Ease of intubation correlated with the view obtained and with the degree of manipulation of the ILMA needed to achieve tracheal intubation. Intubation was successful in 93 patients. Of the seven intubation failures, five occurred in the first 20 patients. Conventional connection to the breathing system and ventilation of the lungs of the patients were possible throughout the intubation procedure.     

Laryngeal mask and reduction of nasal bone fractures

A retrospective study was conducted in 116 patients who underwent anesthesia for reduction of nasal fracture under laryngeal mask for ventilation and protection of the airways. One patient had secondary intubation due to difficult insertion of the laryngeal mask. No episode of hypoxemia related to blood inhalation occurred. The laryngeal mask may be proposed to maintain the airway in this surgical procedure.     

Nasal fibreoptic tracheal intubation in anaesthetised patients breathing via a modified laryngeal mask airway

A modified laryngeal mask airway was used to facilitate nasotracheal intubation with a fibreoptic laryngoscope. A size 4 laryngeal mask airway was modified by creating a defect at the base of the stem and removing the bars to allow passage of the fibreoptic laryngoscope from the nasopharynx to the larynx. The laryngeal mask airway cuff was split and the cut edges were sealed with silicone. This design allowed the cuff to function normally and allowed removal of the split laryngeal mask airway after the tracheal tube had been 'railroaded' into place. Thirty-four patients were studied. The split laryngeal mask airway was easily inserted with satisfactory airway maintenance in 32 patients. Nasal airway endoscopy and laryngoscopy were successfully achieved with the split laryngeal mask airway in place in 31 of 32 patients. Railroading the tracheal tube over the fibreoptic laryngoscope with the split laryngeal mask airway in place was successful in all 31 of these patients. This prototype split laryngeal mask airway allows good airway maintenance while fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation is performed.     

The laryngeal mask airway and positive-pressure ventilation

BACKGROUND: The utility of the laryngeal mask airway during positive-pressure ventilation has yet to be determined. Our study was designed to assess whether significant leaks occurred with positive-pressure ventilation and if leaks were associated with gastroesophageal insufflation. METHODS: Forty-eight patients undergoing elective surgery were studied. After induction of anesthesia and paralysis, controlled ventilation was used with four different peak pressure settings in each patient (15, 20, 25, and 30 cmH2O). The order of ventilator pressure settings was assigned from a randomized block schedule. Data collected included inspiratory and expiratory volumes, qualitative assessments of gastroesophageal insufflation, and leak at the neck. After data collection during laryngeal mask use, the anesthesiologist intubated the trachea and measurements were repeated for tracheal tube ventilation. Leak was calculated by subtracting the expiratory from the inspiratory volume and expressed as a fraction of the inspiratory volume. RESULTS: Ventilation with the laryngeal mask airway was adequate at all ventilation pressures and comparable with tracheal tube ventilation. Leak fraction (mean +/- SD) at 15, 20, 25, and 30 cmH2O for laryngeal mask ventilation were 0.13 +/- 0.15, 0.21 +/- 0.18, 0.25 +/- 0.16 and 0.27 +/- 0.17, respectively, and 0.03 +/- 0.03, 0.05 +/- 0.03, 0.05 +/- 0.03 and 0.04 +/- 0.03, respectively, for tracheal tube ventilation. Leak fractions for ventilation with the laryngeal mask were consistently greater than those measured for tracheal tube ventilation at similar ventilation pressures. Leak fraction with laryngeal mask ventilation increased with increasing airway pressures, whereas leak with tracheal tube ventilation remained unchanged. The frequency of gastroesophageal insufflation ranged from 2.1% at a ventilation pressure of 15 cmH2O to 35.4% at 30 cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: Ventilation using the laryngeal mask appears to be adequate if airway resistance and pulmonary compliance are normal. Gastroesophageal insufflation of air will become a problem in the presence increased ventilation pressure.     

Ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway by inexperienced personnel when using an introducer

The Portex introducer for the laryngeal mask airway was designed as an aid to successful insertion, acting as an idealised 'artificial hard palate' to guide the tip of the laryngeal mask into the correct position. A number of authors have investigated laryngeal mask insertion by unskilled personnel in certain situations, one example being nurses during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We investigated whether the introducer had any effect on the incidence of first-time successful LMA placement by unskilled personnel. These were nonanaesthetist doctors, randomly assigned to have one attempt at LMA insertion in an anaesthetised patient, with and without the introducer. In 44 patients with the LMA being inserted according to the manufacturer's instructions, there was a 68% success rate (14 failures). In 45 patients with the LMA being inserted with the aid of a Portex introducer, there was a 96% success rate (two failures). This was a highly significant improvement (p < 0.001).     

The laryngeal mask--a valuable instrument for cases of difficult intubation in children. Anesthesiologic management in the presence of Pierre-Robin syndrome

In cases of craniofacial and mandibulofacial malformations, which are mostly treated during childhood, difficult intubation conditions must generally be expected. In such cases, the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) an alternative instrument for use in endotracheal intubation is a new aid for ventilation. In certain instances, it can be used alone to induce general anaesthesia. Reports of endotracheal intubation by means of the LMA in adults have also been published. CASE REPORT: In our case, a 6-year-old boy with Pierre-Robin syndrome (triad: micrognathia, broad palatoschisis, glossoptosis) needed dental resetting. After induction of anaesthesia in this very cooperative boy with thiopentone and fluothane and relaxation with succinylcholine, it was not possible to examine the hypopharynx by laryngoscopy preparatory to nasal intubation as usual. Repeated blind attempts at nasal intubation (again with spontaneous breathing) failed, as did the attempt at fibreoptic bronchoscopic intubation, because of the narrow anatomical conditions. Finally, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA; size 2) was introduced, and as a result of this ventilation was achieved. However, endotracheal intubation was required for performance of the surgical resetting. With the fibreoptic bronchoscope, we could verify the central position of the LMA over the glottis. A tracheal tube (size 4) was inserted across the laryngeal airway without optic control. The tube connector was disconnected and a normal guide inserted into the tube to remove the LMA. The dental resetting was also performed by oral intubation. CONCLUSION: Therefore, the LMA is not only a ventilation aid, but also a valuable tool in difficult intubation conditions. In our opinion, it is necessary to provide this tool in every anaesthetic unit.     

Fibreoptic intubation using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and Aintree intubation catheter

A cuffed oropharyngeal airway has recently been introduced which has larger internal dimensions than a comparable Guedel airway. This allows a ventilation/exchange bougie, the Aintree Intubation Catheter, mounted on a fibreoptic laryngoscope to pass through it. Its 15-mm connector and pharyngeal cuff suggested the possibility of using a Rüsch sealed-port angle piece to allow ventilation through the oropharyngeal airway during fibreoptic laryngoscopy. This study investigated using this equipment to intubate the trachea through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway in paralysed patients, whilst maintaining ventilation manually with a Bain system. In 20 patients, airway control was satisfactory throughout and tracheal intubation was accomplished without complications. The cuffed oropharyngeal airway was easy to manipulate to improve a suboptimal fibreoptic view of the larynx. This may give it an advantage over the laryngeal mask airway when used as a ventilation/intubation conduit.     

The use of the laryngeal mask in a female patient with an unpredictable difficult intubation

A laryngeal mask was used after repeated ineffective attempts at intubation. Preoperative examinations failed to defect signs of a possible difficult intubation. Laryngoscopy showed a true glottis, but it was impossible to insert tube No. 6 in the trachea. Failure of attempts at intubation made us use a laryngeal mask for maintaining the patency of the upper airways. Anesthesia coursed smoothly in the presence of stable hemodynamics and gas exchange. Use of laryngeal mask helped solve the problem of unpredictable difficult intubation and provide reliable patency of the upper respiratory airways in a female patient with latent stenosis of the subglottal space.     

The laryngeal mask airway: a new standard for airway evaluation in thoracic surgery

BACKGROUND: Thoracic surgeons typically perform fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB) before thoracotomy, usually on the day of the operation after intubation with a single-lumen endotracheal tube (ETT) and before insertion of a double-lumen ETT. This routine requires two laryngoscopies and two intubations. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) is an airway device developed in England and approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1991 for clinical use in the United States. It requires neither mask ventilation nor laryngoscopy and allows FOB visualization of the epiglottis, larynx, and entire trachea. We assessed the LMA as an alternative to a single-lumen ETT for FOB before thoracotomy. METHODS: Through prospective assessment, 50 patients underwent FOB after insertion of an LMA before thoracotomy. Pulse rate, blood pressure, ease of insertion of the LMA, quality of FOB, and complications of LMA insertion were assessed. RESULTS: During LMA insertion, blood pressure and pulse rate increased less than 5% from baseline in all patients. The LMA was inserted successfully in all patients within 10 seconds. No complications occurred as a result of LMA insertion. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion of the LMA causes minimal hemodynamic response. From the time of induction of general anesthesia, insertion of the LMA is quick, simple, and safe and eliminates the need for endotracheal intubation with a single-lumen ETT before double-lumen tube insertion. The LMA, in contrast to the ETT, allows a complete survey of the larynx and trachea. The LMA is autoclavable, reusable, and cost effective. Therefore, in patients who require FOB immediately before thoracotomy, LMA use should be the standard for airway evaluation.     

Clinical assessment of the single use laryngeal mask airway--the LMA-unique

We conducted a clinical comparison of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the new single use PVC LMA (LMA-Unique) in 100 fasted adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were allocated to one of two groups: group 1 (n = 50) was managed by two consultants and group 2 by two trainee anaesthetists. Airway management was randomized prospectively within each group, and cuff pressure in both devices was maintained at a maximum of 50 mm Hg with upward size substitution if leaks persisted during intermittent positive pressure ventilation (IPPV). Insertion with the recommended technique was successful in all patients (85 first attempt). One patient (group 1) required four attempts for insertion of the LMA-Unique and in one patient (group 2) the LMA-Unique was replaced by a tracheal tube because of persistent leaks during IPPV. In 99 patients IPPV was uneventful. The adjusted mean volume of air for cuff inflation in the LMA-Unique was significantly less in group 1 (P = 0.0013). At fibreoptic laryngoscopic examination, the vocal cords or arytenoids, or both, could be seen in 92% of patients in group 1 and in 90% of patients in group 2. Immediate throat soreness was reported in four patients in group 1 and in seven in group 2. The results suggest that the LMA-Unique was similar in clinical performance to the LMA.     

Difficult intubation and brain-stem anaesthesia

PURPOSE: To present a case of difficult intubation with brainstem anaesthesia after retrobulbar block with bupivacaine and lidocaine and sedation with midazolam and to point out that close monitoring and timely treatment is important in preventing an unfavourable outcome. CLINICAL FEATURES: An 82-yr-old man with treated hypertension and stable angina was scheduled for cataract extraction. Physical examination revealed a class 2 airway. He had a retrobulbar block after topical tetracaine drops, with bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% with hyaluronidase under sedation with 1 mg midazolam. Five minutes after the block, respiration slowed, he became unresponsive and oxygen saturation decreased to 80%. Immediate ventilation with mask without additional oxygen improved saturation. Attempted tracheal intubation failed: the epiglottis could not be visualized despite flaccid jaw and extremities. A laryngeal mask airway was placed which was leaking and adequate ventilation could not be achieved but a second laryngeal mask airway was placed successfully. CONCLUSION: This case emphasizes the need for dose monitoring and personnel capable of managing the difficult airway when intra-orbital anaesthesia is used.     

The laryngeal mask in pediatric anesthesia

We carried out a perspective study in order to assess the ease of insertion, the type and the incidence of perioperative complications connected with the use of the Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA). We examined 300 consecutive patients, M/F 261/39, average age 4.2 yrs. (range 0.1-16), ASA I-II, who underwent surgical operations of short or average length not involving the pleural, the oropharyngeal or the peritoneum cavity. The choice about anesthesia was left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. In 27 cases the position of the LM was controlled through a flexible fiberoptics. In 269 patients (89.6%) the LMA was correctly positioned during the first attempt. In 27 patients (9%), 2 or more attempts were necessary, and in 4 patients (1.4%) it was not possible to set the LMA. No differences of statistical significance were noticed between the different size of LMA, with regards to the facility of insertion. The control through fiberoptics showed a correct position, from an anatomical point of view, in 11 patients (41%), whereas in 13 patients (48%) some signs of partial obstruction were noticed (epiglottis interposing between the opening of LMA and larynx) and in 3 patients (11%) vocal cords are not visible. The following complications took place: laryngeal spasm on induction (2.3%), cough or movements on positioning (2.3%), hypoxia (4.3%), obstruction (1%), laryngeal spasm on awakening (1.7%), trauma (5%) and vomiting (0.3%). No connections were found between the size of LMA and total complications. Nevertheless, cough or movement during positioning and laryngeal spasm on awakening were significantly more frequent with LMA n. 3. In our experience, the LMA proved to be effectual and safe in the control of the airway during elective operations in pediatric surgery.     

Unilateral hypoglossal nerve paralysis following the use of the laryngeal mask airway

We report a unilateral hypoglossal nerve paralysis following the use of a laryngeal mask airway in a 62-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis undergoing a shoulder joint replacement. Cervical epidural anaesthesia was combined with general anaesthesia using nitrous oxide administered via a laryngeal mask airway with the patient in the right lateral decubitus position. The next morning, the patient was noted to have a right hypoglossal nerve palsy. Compression of the nerve between the laryngeal mask airway cuff, distended with nitrous oxide, and the hyoid bone, was considered to be the cause of the nerve paralysis.     

Co-induction and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison of thiopentone versus propofol

Conditions for insertion of the laryngeal mask airway were assessed in 70 unpremedicated patients comparing the co-induction with midazolam-alfentanil-thiopentone and midazolam-alfentanil-propofol. Following pre-induction doses of midazolam 0.04 mg.kg-1 and alfentanil 10 micrograms.kg-1, patients received equipotent doses of either thiopentone or propofol. Whilst jaw relaxation and ease of laryngeal mask insertion were similar between the two groups, patients receiving propofol were less likely to have undesired responses requiring additional boluses of induction agent (p < 0.05). We conclude that, using these doses, propofol is superior to thiopentone for laryngeal mask airway insertion when using a co-induction technique.     

Pulmonary airway resistance with the endotracheal tube versus laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients

BACKGROUND: The hypothesis that airway resistance is less with the laryngeal mask airway than with the endotracheal tube was tested. METHODS: Thirty-six paralyzed, anesthetized adult patients with no respiratory disease (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3; age, 18-80 yr) were randomly allocated (9 men, 9 women in each group) to receive either a size-4 laryngeal mask airway or an endotracheal tube (men, 9-mm ID; women, 8-mm ID). A pulmonary monitor with flow transducer and esophageal balloon was used to measure peak airway pressure and mean airway resistance (device resistance plus pulmonary airway resistance) at three different tidal volumes (5, 10, and 15 ml/kg). Device resistance was measured in vitro with the distal end of the endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway open to the atmosphere and using the same ventilator settings. Pulmonary airway resistance was derived by subtracting the mean device resistance from the mean airway resistance. RESULTS: Peak airway pressure, mean airway resistance, device resistance, and pulmonary airway resistance were greater for the endotracheal tube (all P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The laryngeal mask airway triggers less bronchoconstriction than does the endotracheal tube in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients. This may have implications for maintaining intraoperative pulmonary function and reducing the risk for atelectasis and pulmonary infection.     

Airway control during percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: pilot study with the intubating laryngeal mask airway

Percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy has become a common procedure for bedside insertion of tracheostomy tubes in the intensive care unit. Management of the airway during the procedure using the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and other methods has been described. The intubating laryngeal mask airway has several potential benefits for airway management during percutaneous dilatation tracheostomy compared with the LMA. These include the use of both the fibreoptic bronchoscope and tracheal tube if necessary. We report the results of a pilot study of 10 patients that illustrates these advantages.     

Perinatal management of unanticipated congenital laryngeal atresia

Unless ventilation is achieved within minutes of delivery, patients with congenital laryngeal atresia will not survive. There are 2 settings in which survival is more likely: a tracheotomy may be immediately performed in the delivery room, or a communication may exist between the airway and the pharynx, allowing for air exchange. In the latter case, there are no characteristic findings on prenatal sonography to suggest the diagnosis and to ensure that preparations for immediate tracheotomy are made. We describe a neonate with unanticipated laryngeal atresia and a high tracheoesophageal fistula. Ventilation was maintained first by face mask and then by esophageal intubation until a tracheotomy could be performed. This report provides detailed photodocumentation of the anomaly, discusses the mechanism of air exchange, reviews the relevant embryological development, and outlines a protocol for perinatal management of unanticipated laryngeal atresia.     

Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (ETCO2) difference during spontaneous ventilation through a face mask, a laryngeal mask (LMA), or a cuffed oropharyngeal airway. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, cross-over study. SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at a university department of orthopedic surgery. PATIENTS: 20 ASA physical status I and II patients, without respiratory disease, who underwent ankle and foot surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After a peripheral nerve block was performed, propofol anesthesia was induced and then maintained with a continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (4 to 6 mg/kg/h). A face mask, a cuffed oropharyngeal airway, or an LMA were placed in each patient in a random sequence. After 15 minutes of spontaneous breathing through each of the airways, ventilatory variables, as well as arterial, end-tidal, and mixed expired CO2 partial pressure, were measured, and physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio was calculated. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Expired minute volume and respiratory rate (RR) were lower with LMA (5.6 +/- 1.2 L/min and 18 +/- 3 breaths/min) and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (5.7 +/- 1 L/min and 18 +/- 3 breaths/min) than the face mask (7.1 +/- 0.9 L/min and 21 +/- 3 breaths/min) (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.013, respectively). Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio and arterial to end tidal CO2 tension difference were similar with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (3 +/- 0.4 mmHg and 4.4 +/- 1.4 mmHg) and LMA (3 +/- 0.6 mmHg and 3.7 +/- 1 mmHg) and lower than with the face mask (4 +/- 0.5 mmHg and 6.7 +/- 2 mmHg) (p = 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Because of the increased dead space/tidal volume ratio, breathing through a face mask required higher RR and expired minute volume than either the cuffed oropharyngeal airway or LMA, which, in contrast, showed similar effects on the quality of ventilation in spontaneously breathing anesthetized patients.