Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach in patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis

BACKGROUND: The Optimal management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains controversial. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted in 145 of the 481 patients who had a preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram before their laparoscopic cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram was successful in 138 patients (95%), and common duct calculi were found in 72 (50%) of them. Endoscopic sphincterotomy with ductal clearance was achieved in 62 of 67 patients during a mean of 1.4 sessions (range, 1 to 5). Five (3.4%) patients had complications after endoscopic intervention, all of which resolved uneventfully . Fourteen patients underwent laparoscopic common duct exploration, five had failed endoscopic extraction, five had their common duct stones left intentionally for laparoscopic intervention, and, in addition, four of the seven patients who had a failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiogram had stones identified by intraoperative cholangiogram. Ten of these 14 patients underwent a successful laparoscopic common duct exploration. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully completed in 134 of the 145 patients, and none had major intraoperative or postoperative complications. The mean postoperative stay was 2.7 days for those patients who underwent a successful laparoscopic procedure. The overall mean number of admissions for completing the treatment was 2.3. CONCLUSIONS: Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic approach is a viable option for patients with gallstones and choledocholithiasis.     

Sequential intraluminal endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment for bile duct stones associated with gallstones

BACKGROUND: On the basis of a flowchart including prior or current jaundice or pancreatitis, abnormal liver function, ultrasound or IV cholangiography, bile duct (BD) stones were suspected in 71/593 patients referred for gallstones. METHODS: When endoscopic retrograde cholangiography detected BD stones, endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) and endoscopic BD clearance were attempted, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). BD stones were found in 44/71 patients. The sensitivity values of preoperative conditions were: 92% for IV cholangiography, 88% for abnormal liver function, 50% for ultrasound, and 37% for jaundice at admission. RESULTS: Endoscopic clearance succeeded in 37 patients and LC was completed in 33 patients. Conversion to open surgery (9%) was comparable with the rate in patients without BD stones. The median hospital stay for the sequential endoscopic and laparoscopic treatments was 13 days (range 4-54) or 22 days if open surgery was used. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, BD stones can be endoscopically cleared preoperatively in most patients without interfering with LC.     

Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic management of cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis

With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, optimal management of common duct stones remains controversial. Seven hundred six patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy in our institution from January 1990 through January 1992. From this group of patients, 50 were identified as having clinical or radiographic evidence of common duct stones. Thirty-one patients demonstrated preoperative risk factors for common duct stones and underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The risk factors included jaundice (19%), pancreatitis (23%), elevated liver function tests (52%), and ultrasound evidence of choledocholithiasis (6%). Preoperative ERCP was performed in 94% of patients. There were two failures due to periampullary diverticula. Common duct stones were identified in 18 patients (62%) and successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy in all of these patients. Nineteen patients were found to have unsuspected common duct stones on intraoperative cholangiography. Eighteen patients (95%) underwent successful ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy with stone extraction. Overall, major morbidity was 2% and included one patient who experienced endoscopic sphincteroplasty. The three endoscopic failures were managed by open common duct exploration, laparoscopic duct exploration, and combined laparoscopic and open common duct exploration. We conclude that combined laparoscopic and endoscopic therapy is a viable option for the management of cholelithiasis with choledocholithiasis.     

Comparison of routine and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

To evaluate the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we compared the frequency of concomitant common bile duct stones, their clinical outcome, and the frequency of bile duct injury between a group of 128 patients with routine preoperative ERC (group A) and 1010 patients with selective ERC (group B). Overall, 48 patients (4.2%) had duct stones, but the predictive signs were absent in six of them (12.5%). The stones were demonstrated by ERC and removed by sphincterotomy in all 11 patients in group A. Of 37 patients in group B, 22 were diagnosed by selective ERC and underwent endoscopic removal. Of four patients whose stones were found by operative cholangiography, one had immediate open surgery, another passed a stone spontaneously, and the other two underwent postoperative sphincterotomy, which failed in one. The stones were not recognized until pain recurred in the remaining 11 patients. Sphincterotomy was successful in nine patients but failed in the other two. Thus postoperative sphincterotomy failed in 3 of 13 patients (23%), necessitating open surgery. Forty-two patients overall (3.7%) had aberrant biliary tract anatomy, which did not lead to bile duct injury in any of the patients. Morbidity of routine ERC (3.1%) was lower than that of selective ERC (7.4%) (p < 0.05). It should be noted that a certain proportion of duct stones may be missed by selective ERC, necessitating laparotomy when sphincterotomy fails. The routine use of preoperative ERC may be justified at institutions where the expertise is available, at least until laparoscopic lithotomy becomes easy.     

Laparo-endoscopic "rendezvous": a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stone clearance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy may fail due to difficulties in cannulating the papilla major. In this study we propose a new technique that facilitates the cannulation of the papilla and the common bile duct stone clearance during a standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Its clearance percentage, complication rate and post-operative stay have been evaluated and compared with standardized procedures such as open surgery and endoscopic sphincterotomy before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: In a group of 16 patients presenting with cholelithiasis and common bile duct stones or papillitis, the sphincterotome was driven across the papilla into the choledochus by a Dormia basket passed in the duodenum through the cystic duct during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Measures of outcome were clearance rate, mortality, morbidity and hospital stay. Furthermore, data obtained from this sample of patients were compared with those from another two groups of 16 patients in which choledocholithiasis was managed either by endoscopic sphincterotomy performed before laparoscopic cholecystectomy or by open cholecystectomy and trans-duodenal sphincterotomy. RESULTS: The rate of cannulation of the papilla and of the common bile duct stone clearance was 100% when the combined endo-laparoscopic approach was used in 15 patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy (93,7%) and in 15 patients with open sphincterotomy (93,7%), cholecystectomy was successful in every case. The groups were statistically similar with regard to complications; none of the patients required blood transfusion. The mean post operative stay was 95.2 hours (range 48-240) for the first group, 350.1 hours (range 192-1680) for the second and 69.7 hours (range 24-132) for the third. CONCLUSION: The laparo-endoscopic rendezvous, though still in evolution, is an efficacious method which can be used during the laparoscopic strategy of common bile duct clearance.     

15 years of endoscopic therapy in choledocholithiasis

INTRODUCTION: The relevance of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones has increased since the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 1989-1990. METHODS: The number, indications, success and complication rate of ERCP were analyzed retrospectively in 1121 consecutive patients with bile duct stones treated at Berne University Hospital between 1980 and 1994. RESULTS: The number of patients undergoing endoscopic stone extraction increased slowly from 1980 to 1990, but has shown a 4-fold increase in the last 5 years parallel to the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Failure to diagnose and remove bile duct stones decreased 5-fold from 23% (14 of 60 patients) in 1986 to 4.4% (10 of 225 patients) in 1994. Major complications occurred in 3.2% (30 of 617 patients) and consisted of acute pancreatitis (1.6%), hemorrhage of the papilla (1%), and cholangitis (0.6%). The severity but not the number of complications has decreased in the last 15 years. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones are usually treated by endoscopic stone extraction combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Open operation with bile duct exploration is reserved for a small subgroup of patients with specific problems.     

Factors predictive of early complications of endoscopic treatment of bile duct calculi

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Factors associated with an increased early complication rate of the endoscopic sphincterotomy procedure have been identified. Precut or needle knife papillotomy has been shown to improve the success rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy, but has often been reported to be hazardous. In order to identify patients with bile duct stones at risk for a complicated course in connection with endoscopic clearance of the calculi, factors predictive of early complications were sought. METHODOLOGY: 417 consecutive patients with bile duct calculi at endoscopic retrograde cholangiography were considered for endoscopic treatment in our department from 1981 to 1992. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 246 patients with intact gallbladders and in 147 with prior cholecystectomy, 55 of whom had retained calculi. RESULTS: There was a 9.4% overall and 7.1% major early complication rate of the EST procedure and a 30-day mortality of 0.5% (2 patients, non-procedure related). In 22% (6/27) of the patients with major complications, surgery was required or preferred to additional endoscopic measures. Complete stone removal failed in 35/393 patients (8.9%). The immediate and early complication rate of standard sphincterotomy was not found to be increased in patients with prior or present biliopancreatic complications, failed bile duct clearance at first attempt, or juxtapapillary diverticula. It was the same after standard sphincterotomy as after precut papillotomy followed by immediate or delayed sphincterotomy. No increased morbidity was found after failed therapy as compared to failed diagnostic precut papillotomy. There was neither a greater need for, nor an increased complication rate following, precut papillotomy in patients with, as compared to those without, juxtapapillary diverticula. Endoscopic experience did not influence the complication rate. There were no significant differences regarding outcome or risk factors associated morbidity between patients with and without intact gallbladder. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm that endoscopic treatment is safe and that precut papillotomy can be performed without increased morbidity. Furthermore, none of the commonly identified factors associated with increased morbidity were found to be risk factors in this study.     

Management of choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

The development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rekindled the issue of management of choledocholithiasis. A number of options exist including pre or postoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (ERCP-ES), laparoscopic common duct exploration or open common duct exploration. We present here our experience with the management of choledocholithiasis in patients treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. From January 1991 to January 1995, 900 patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. 71 ERCP were carried out in 71 patients with suspicion or evidence of choledocholithiasis. Common duct stones were detected in 44 patients. Preoperative ERCP was done in 56 patients, with suspicion of choledocholithiasis, based on clinical, laboratory or ultrasonographic findings. 29 of these patients (51.7%) had common duct stones, that were successfully removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy. One patient suffered mild pancreatitis and a second one had transient hyperamylasemia. Postoperative ERCP was performed in 15 patients. Indications for ERCP were the evidence of common duct stones in intraoperative cholangiography in 7 cases, and clinical or laboratory suspicion of choledocholithiasis, 3 months to 3 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Stones were detected in 100% of the patients. In 11 patients (73.3%), the stones were extracted by endoscopic sphincterotomy and 4 patients underwent open common duct exploration. Two patients had transient hyperamylasemia. ERCP is a safe and effective method for detection and treatment of common duct stones. ERCP prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients suspected of having choledocholithiasis, is safe and offers with good results. Rutinary intraoperative cholangiography is recommended, for the detection of unsuspected choledocholithiasis and as an effective treatment (postoperative-ERCP, open or laparoscopic common duct exploration) can be chosen depending on surgeon's skills and patient's characteristics.     

Sulbactam/ampicillin in comparison with cefuroxime for infections of the lower respiratory tract. Results of a prospective, randomized comparative study

Gallbladder removal using laparoscopic techniques has rapidly been adopted by surgeons around the world. Questions have been raised concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including the safety of the operation, its implications for management of common bile duct stones, and the means by which surgeons should be trained. In the present series, 424 patients were referred to a single surgeon for cholecystectomy during a 22-month period. A traditional open cholecystectomy was performed in 9 patients (2.1%) because of presumed contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in the remaining 415 patients (97.9%). On the basis of preoperative investigations, 19 patients (4.6%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction were performed in the 13 patients (3.1%) demonstrating choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was converted to an open operation in 8 patients (1.9%) owing to dense adhesions, obscure anatomy, or cholangiographic abnormalities. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed in 407 patients (96%) in 95 +/- 2 minutes (mean +/- SEM). Surgical trainees were involved in all operations and performed 68% of the procedures under supervision. Cystic duct cholangiograms were obtained selectively in 129 patients (30.4%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 patients, including 1 patient with a minor injury to the common bile duct (0.2%). There was no perioperative mortality, and major complications occurred in 6 patients (1.4%). Minor complications were seen in 12 others (2.8%), and one patient required reoperation for a trocar injury to the jejunum. Prolonged follow-up has revealed one case of asymptomatic retained common bile duct stones (0.2%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can therefore be performed in more than 95% of patients with no mortality and minimal morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Control of the temporal aspect when considering risk factors for acute otitis media

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, initially performed in France in 1987, has rapidly spread to other European countries, the United States, and elsewhere. Of the techniques that have evolved, the "French" technique, in which the surgeon stands between the patient's legs, and the "American" technique, in which the surgeon stands on the patient's left side, are the most commonly used. In the former technique, the liver is retracted via the mid-clavicular cannula and the infundibulum of the gallbladder via the anterior axillary port. In the latter technique, the liver is retracted by axial traction on the gallbladder through the anterior axillary cannula and the infundibulum through the mid-clavicular cannula. This position may increase the risk of bile duct injury. The technique selected for operative cholangiography should be adapted to the problem at hand. Cystic duct cholangiography shows ductal calculi more reliably due to better filling of the common bile duct; direct puncture of the gallbladder is safer when the biliary anatomy is unclear. A number of European studies confirm the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mortality rates vary between 0% and 0.1%, and duct injury rates range between 0.2% and 0.6%. Conversion, which is done in 3% to 8% of cases, may be necessary in the case of uncontrollable hemorrhage, bile duct injury unsuitable for laparoscopic repair, or if the gallbladder is densely scarred (scleroatrophic). It can also be done for safety reasons, when the anatomy is unclear. Complications include bile collections due to accessory duct or cystic duct stump leaks or less commonly to common duct injury. The average postoperative stay is longer in Europe (3.2 days) than in the United States. A decision tree is presented for the management of common bile duct stones. In general, preoperatively identified ductal stones are removed by endoscopic sphincterotomy, which is then followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy to remove the source of the calculi. The techniques of laparoscopic choledochotomy and transcystic exploration for the removal of stones in the common bile duct are only beginning to be used, but they may well prove to be the most popular procedures. Results with these procedures will need to be evaluated against those obtained with endoscopic sphincterotomy.     

Laparoscopic management of acute cholecystitis with subtotal cholecystectomy

Approximately 20 per cent of laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed for acute cholecystitis require conversion to open cholecystectomy because of severe inflammation. In a retrospective review of 125 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gallbladder disease from January 1995 through June 1997, 31 had acute cholecystitis. Eight patients underwent a subtotal cholecystectomy because of severe inflammation. There were no conversions to open cholecystectomy and no intraoperative complications. Selected patients were evaluated and treated for common duct stones with preoperative endoscopy to avoid intraoperative cholangiography. One patient had a retained common duct stone successfully managed with postoperative endoscopy. Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy is a safe and effective alternative to conversion to open cholecystectomy for severe inflammation associated with acute cholecystitis. Endoscopic assessment and treatment of common duct stones when indicated either before or after surgery omits the use of intraoperative cholangiography and potential injury to the inflamed ducts.     

Choledocholithiasis at the hepatic confluence mimicking a hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Adenocarcinomas of the bifurcation of the hepatic ducts (Klatskin tumors) are a relatively rare cause of obstructive jaundice. Differential diagnosis includes other neoplastic lesions, sclerosing cholangitis, Mirizzi's syndrome and benign strictures. We present a 46 year-old white female with a 2 month history of epigastric pain and progressive jaundice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) revealed a filiform stenosis of the right hepatic duct and an obstructed left hepatic duct, an image strongly suggestive of a Klatskin tumor. The correct diagnosis was achieved, however, by percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC), which disclosed a gallstone at the common hepatic duct bifurcation and multiple small concrements in the left hepatic duct. After endoscopic removal of the gallstones in the biliary tree and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the patient was discharged on the third post-operative day. Protuberant tumors and round biliary stones may be confused at ERCP.     

Laparoscopic transcystic choledochoscopy

Preoperative prediction of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is imprecise. Cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the best method for detection of CBDS. Treatment of most stones detected at LC can be safely accomplished using transcystic choledochoscopy and stone extraction. This technique is applicable in nearly 90% of patients with CBD calculi. It may be preferable to endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) in younger patients and is probably equivalent to ES in patients over 65 years of age.     

Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting

Basket extraction after endoscopic sphincterotomy failed to clear the bile ducts immediately in 85 (30%) of 283 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones. Temporary biliary drainage was established by the insertion of a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent before further planned endoscopic attempts at stone removal. In 84 patients (21 male: 63 female, mean age 77 years) this measure relieved biliary obstruction, mean serum bilirubin falling from 101 to 18 umol/l by the time of the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Six patients died from non-biliary causes with temporary stents in situ. Common bile duct stone extraction was achieved endoscopically in 50 of the remaining 79 patients after a mean of 4.3 months (range 1-12), 34 (68%) requiring only one further procedure. Three patients were referred for biliary surgery. Single stents were also effective for longterm biliary drainage in the remaining 26 elderly patients with unextractable stones. The main biliary complication of stenting was 13 episodes of cholangitis but all except one responded to medical treatment and early stent exchange. If common bile duct stones remain after endoscopic sphincterotomy, a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent is effective and safe for temporary biliary drainage before further endoscopic attempts at duct clearance and for longterm biliary drainage especially in the old and frail.     

Choledocholithiasis and gallstone pancreatitis

Gallstones are commonly found within the main bile duct (MBD) of patients undergoing cholecystectomy. Retained MBD stones are a common cause of obstructive symptoms and complications. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and sphincterotomy (ES) is the recommended modality for both the detection of such stones and their extraction. Recent trials of ERCP in conjunction with laparoscopic cholecystectomy suggest that it should be reserved for use post-operatively. Gallstones within the MBD are the most common single cause of acute pancreatitis. Initial treatment is supportive, although new agents designed to suppress the systemic inflammatory response are under development and have proved beneficial in clinical trials. Severe cases should be treated with systemic antibiotics and early removal of the obstructing stones by ERCP and ES. Prophylactic cholecystectomy is recommended to prevent further attacks of gallstone pancreatitis.     

Cardiac transplantation in patients aged 60 years or older

The indications and best technique for peroperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain unclear, but the operation has been associated with an increased use of preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Cystic duct cholangiography, particularly in the hands of the trainee, can be time consuming, and bile duct injury may be caused by attempts to cannulate the cystic duct. This study analyses 113 consecutive patients undergoing peroperative cholangiography through the gallbladder, or cholecystocholangiography. It was successful in 92 (81.4%) patients, the procedure adding less than 10 min to the operating time. There were no cholangiogram-related complications. Common anatomical variations included both short and particularly wide cystic ducts. This information helps to minimize the risk of damage to the common bile duct. This study demonstrates that cholecystocholangiography is a safe, simple, and effective alternative to cystic duct cholangiography with virtually no "learning curve." It provides a "road-map" of biliary anatomy and identifies common bile duct stones prior to the commencement of dissection. Unsuccessful cholecystocholangiography does not preclude the use of cystic duct cholangiography later in the operation. Difficult anatomy is demonstrated prior to dissection. When unsuspected bile duct calculi necessitate open exploration, further laparoscopic dissection is avoided.     

Selected versus routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Routine use of intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is still widely advocated and standard in many departments, however, this is discussed controversially. We have developed a new diagnostic strategy to detect bile duct stones. The concept is based on an ultrasound examination and on a screening for the presence of six risk indicators of choledocholithiasis. 120 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were prospectively screened for the presence of six risk indicators of choledocholithiasis: history of jaundice; history of pancreatitis; hyperbilirubinemia; hyperamylasemia; dilated bile duct; unclear ultrasound findings. The sensitivity of ultrasound and of intraoperative cholangiography in diagnosing bile duct stones was also evaluated. For the detection of bile duct stones, the sensitivity was 77% for ultrasound and 100% for intraoperative cholangiography. 20% of all patients had at least one risk indicator. The presence of a risk indicator correlated significantly with the presence of choledocholithiasis (p < 0.01, chi-square-test). The negative predictive value of the total set of risk indicators was 100%. Following our diagnostic concept, we would have avoided 80% of intraoperative cholangiographies without missing a stone in the bile duct. This study lends further support to the view that the routine use of intraoperative cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not necessary.     

Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct

Between January 1989 and June 1990, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 308 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (mean age: 74 years). Complete clearance of common bile duct was achieved at the first attempt in 65% of cases. This rate was significantly related to the size and the number of biliary stones. The success rate reached 97 percent after repeated endoscopic sessions (127 patients), mechanical lithotripsy (20 patients), extracorporeal or intracorporeal lithotripsy (18 and 11 patients, respectively). During the month following the endoscopic sphincterotomy, 39 patients (13%) developed one or more complications and 11 patients (3.7%) died. The complication rate was related to the time elapsed between biliary opacification and endoscopic sphincterotomy (P = 0.04) and between endoscopic sphincterotomy and total common bile duct clearance (P = 0.0007). No patient younger than 75 years died, but death occurred in 4.5% of the patients older than 75 years. Thirty patients (10%) developed endoscopic sphincterotomy-related complications. Cholangitis and bleeding were the most frequent complications (4 and 2%, respectively). Cholangitis occurred more frequently among the patients older than 75 (P < 0.05) or when transhepatic guided endoscopic sphincterotomy or intracorporeal lithotripsy was used (P < 0.005). Cholangitis led to death in 2 patients, 86 and 87 years old (0.7%). Endoscopic sphincterotomy related complications developed within 48 hours in all but 4 patients (2 patients with pancreatitis and 2 patients with cholecystitis).     

Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This paper evaluates the potential benefit of non mechanical bile duct stone lithotripsy techniques. The efficacy, limitations and risks of mechanical lithotripsy as first choice procedure were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed by Erlangen-type papillotomes, stone extraction by Olympus baskets and mechanical lithotripsy by the Wurbs-system. In an unselected series of 704 patients, everyone with common bile and hepatic duct stones (independent of size, number, location and stone consistency) was included in the study. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance by endoscopic sphincterotomy and basket extraction was possible in 87.6%. Additional mechanical lithotripsy led to a success rate of 98.4% and in combination with ESWL of 98.5%. In 11 patients without possibility of endoscopic stone removal (1.6%), 4 had no access transpapillary (B-II-situs or duodenal diverticulum), 5 anatomical problems (S-shaped common bile duct, intrahepatic stones or impacted stones in cystic duct orifice), and 2 refused further endoscopic interventions. Complication rate was 1.4% (thereof 1.1% successful treatment by endoscopic or surgical means), lethality rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A very high rate of stone clearance by standard endoscopic procedures is possible. In those patients where mechanical lithotripsy is not successful, other non-surgical lithotriptic procedures either cannot be applied because of anatomical reasons or if performed, the improvement in success rate is marginal.