Comparison of screening instruments for alcohol problems between black and white emergency room patients from two regions of the country

A number of brief screening instruments to identify alcohol dependence exist, but the validity of these instruments across ethnic groups or regions of the country is not well established. The sensitivity and specificity of a number of standard screening instruments (CAGE, brief MAST, AUDIT, TWEAK, and RAPS), as well as other measures (History of Trauma Scale, breathalyzer reading, self-reported drinking before the event, and consuming five or more drinks at a sitting at least monthly) are compared against ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria for alcohol dependence between probability samples of Black and White emergency room patients in Santa Clara County, CA (n = 716) and in Jackson, MS (n = 1330). Variability in the sensitivity of screening instruments among current drinkers was found to be greater between samples for both Blacks and Whites, than for Blacks compared with Whites within the same sample. The AUDIT, TWEAK, and RAPS seemed to perform well by gender and injury status for both Blacks and Whites in the two samples, and no significant differences were found in the performance of these instruments across sample sites. To evaluate the influence of regional differences in alcohol dependence on differences found in the performance of screening instruments, using logistic regression with the simultaneous entry of demographic variables (age, gender, ethnicity, injury status, and site) and drinking variables (breathalyzer reading, self-reported drinking before the event, and drinking five or more drinks at a sitting at least monthly) to predict alcohol dependence in a merged sample of these patients (Jackson vs. Santa Clara) site was not found to be significant. Data suggest that, whereas region of the country may not be important in predicting alcohol dependence in emergency room populations, regional differences in the performance of screening instruments for alcohol dependence may exist, even when ethnicity is taken into account. Given distinct regional differences in drinking patterns and problems in the U.S., further research on commonly used screening instruments is needed to determine those screeners most efficient for identifying problem drinking.     

Analysis of cut points for screening instruments for alcohol problems in the emergency room

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a number of alcohol screening instruments (CAGE, Brief MAST, AUDIT, TWEAK), in an emergency room population, against ICD-10 criteria for harmful drinking and for alcohol dependence from the CIDI, by gender, race and injury status. METHOD: A probability sample of patients were interviewed (N = 1,330) at the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Analyses were carried out on only current drinkers (n = 771; 58% of the sample). Instruments were compared on sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine optimum cut points. RESULTS: Overall the TWEAK and AUDIT performed best (in relation to sensitivity and area under the ROC curve) at standard cut points (3 and 8, respectively) for both harmful drinking and alcohol dependence. These instruments did not perform equally well across all subgroups, however, particularly among women, and among whites where the CAGE, with a cut point of 1, outperformed both the TWEAK and AUDIT at standard cut points. The TWEAK at a cut point of 2 also did as well as the CAGE at a cut point of 1 among women. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that standard screening instruments do not perform equally well across ethnic and gender subgroups and that consideration of alternative cut points may be appropriate in some populations.     

Alcohol disorders in Canada as indicated by the CAGE questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To describe alcohol disorders in the general Canadian population, using as a standard indicator the CAGE questionnaire (Have you felt you needed to cut down on your drinking? Have you felt annoyed by criticism of your drinking? Have you felt guilty about drinking? Have you felt you needed a drink first thing in the morning [eye-opener]?). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from Canada's Alcohol and Other Drugs Survey (CADS), a national telephone survey conducted in 1994 of a representative sample of 12,155 people aged 15 years or more. PARTICIPANTS: The CAGE questionnaire was administered to 5894 drinkers who had consumed alcohol in the 12 months before the CADS survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents with positive (2 or more affirmative responses) and negative results on the CAGE questionnaire were compared as to demographic characteristics, alcohol consumption and harmful consequences of their drinking. Independent predictors of a positive result were identified by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 5.8% of CAGE-tested current drinkers had a positive result on the past-year CAGE in 1994. The proportion of respondents reporting alcohol-related problems in one or more areas of their life was 7 times greater among drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire than among those with a negative result (66.8% v. 9.5%) (p < 0.0001). When all demographic characteristics were controlled for simultaneously, male sex, residence in the Atlantic provinces, Quebec or the Prairies, single/never married or divorced/separated marital status, and low education level were found to be independent risk factors for a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire. About 85% of the respondents with a positive result had not sought help for their drinking. Applying the estimated sensitivity and specificity of the CAGE questionnaire in detecting alcohol dependence, as per criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, in a general US population, the authors estimated that 4.1% of Canadians had an alcohol dependence in 1994. CONCLUSION: The large proportion of current drinkers with a positive result on the CAGE questionnaire who did not seek help for their drinking underscores the need for identification and brief interventions by physicians. Further research is needed to elucidate the underlying reasons for regional differences in CAGE status.     

Dodecylphosphocholine micelles as a membrane-like environment: new results from NMR relaxation and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement analysis

PURPOSE: To identify specific alcohol use beliefs and behaviors among local high school students; to determine whether relationships exist between alcohol use and various sociodemographic and lifestyle behaviors; and to assist in the development and implementation of alcohol abuse prevention programs. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved the completion of a questionnaire by 1236 Grade 9-13 students (86% response rate) from 62 randomly selected classrooms in three Canadian urban schools. Data analyzed here are part of a larger lifestyle survey. RESULTS: A total of 24% of students reported never having tasted alcohol, 22% have tasted alcohol but do not currently drink, 39% are current moderate drinkers, 11% are current heavy drinkers (five or more drinks on one occasion at least once a month), and 5% did not answer. Reasons stated most often for not drinking were "bad for health" and "upbringing," while reasons stated most often for drinking were "enjoy it" and "to get in a party mood." Student drinking patterns were significantly related to gender, ethnicity, grade, and the reported drinking habits of parents and friends. Older male adolescents who describe their ethnicity as Canadian are at higher risk for heavy drinking than students who are younger or female, or identify their ethnicity as European or Asian. Current heavy drinkers are at higher risk than other students for engaging in other high-risk behaviors such as drinking and driving, being a passenger in a car when the driver is intoxicated, and daily smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy alcohol use in adolescents remains an important community health concern. Older self-described Canadian and Canadian-born male adolescents are at higher risk for heavy drinking. Current and heavy drinking rises significantly between Grades 9 and 12. Students who drink heavily are more likely to drink and drive, to smoke daily, and to have friends and parents who drink alcohol.     

Availability of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) for a complete health examination in Japan

OBJECTIVE: The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) is an instrument designed to identify hazardous drinkers, harmful drinkers and alchoholics. It was translated into Japanese using the WHOQOL method. The concurrent validity and reliability of the Japanese version of AUDIT were evaluated in a complete health examination. The instrument was also compared with the CAGE questionnaire. METHOD: The subjects were 93 applicants attending for health checks in a human dry dock. They completed self-report questionnaires containing the Core AUDIT and CAGE. and underwent a semi-structured interview conducted by a professional physician. RESULT: From the semi-structured interview, it was determined that 23 of the subjects were problem drinkers and 10 were alcoholics. Analyses indicated that the Core AUDIT was sufficiently sensitive and specific for discriminating problem drinkers and alcoholics. Core AUDIT was also superior to CAGE for discriminating problem drinkers from non-problem drinkers, as well as identifying alcoholics. CONCLUSION: The data suggest that the Japanese version of AUDIT is useful for early detection of hazardous or harmful drinkers.     

Screening trauma patients for alcoholism according to NIAAA guidelines with alcohol use disorders identification test questions

Drinking pattern criteria (drinking frequency and number of drinks per occasion) issued by the National Institute on Alcohol and Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) to screen primary practice patients for alcohol problems were evaluated in 1216 injured patients treated in a regional trauma center. Vehicular crash victims predominated (50.2%, of whom 64.5% were drivers), followed by victims of violence (31.2%) and nonviolent-injury victims (18.5%). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questions #1 (drinking frequency) and #2 (drinks/day) were used to assess the patients for current alcohol dependence (CAD). AUDIT responses roughly approximating NIAAA guidelines (high threshold: drinks > or = 4 times/week, > or = 5 drinks/day) and those indicating less drinking (low threshold: drinks > or = 2-3 times/ week, > or = 3 drinks/day) were chosen. Comparisons were made relative to sensitivity and specificity of responses in detecting CAD. When low threshold responses were used for either question, sensitivity to detect CAD increased overall (#1 from 0.53 to 0.80, #2 from 0.62 to 0.88) as well as among the subgroups of patients, whereas specificity remained high or at acceptable levels overall (#1 from 0.95 to 0.82, #2 from 0.92 to 0.71) and among the subgroups of patients. Study findings suggest that, among injured drivers and other groups of trauma center patients, lesser amounts of drinking should be used as screening criteria for CAD than are used for the general population.     

Relations between dietary restraint and patterns of alcohol use in young adult women.

The present study examined relations between dietary restraint and self-reported patterns of alcohol use, including separate assessment of quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption. One hundred seventy-six female university undergraduates completed the Restraint Scale (RS) and measures of their usual quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption over the past year. Quantity and frequency self-reports were scored separately and were also used to calculate 3 additional drinking variables: a composite weekly alcohol consumption score (drinks per week), a binge drinking categorical variable (where participants were classified as either binge drinkers or non-binge drinkers), and a yearly excessive drinking score (number of times in the past year that each participant consumed at least 4 alcoholic beverages per drinking occasion). RS scores were significantly positively correlated with scores on 4 of the 5 drinking behavior measures (i.e., quantity, drinks per week, binge drinking, and yearly excessive drinking, but not frequency). Thus, chronic dieting appears to be related to a relatively heavy drinking pattern that can be characterized as potentially risky, due to its established associations with adverse health and social consequences. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Reasons for drinking alcohol: Relationships with DSM-IV alcohol diagnoses and alcohol consumption in a community sample.

The relationship between self-reported reasons for drinking and the DSM-IV alcohol use disorders and alcohol consumption was examined. Participants were 777 heavy drinking community residents who completed the Alcohol Use Disorders and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (B. F. Grant and D. Hasin, 1992) and a self-report assessment battery. Drinking to reduce negative affect was greater among drinkers with a current DSM-IV alcohol dependence diagnosis compared with drinkers with no DSM-IV alcohol use disorder. The DSM-IV alcohol abuse and the no-diagnosis groups did not differ in reasons for drinking. A positive association was demonstrated between drinking to reduce negative affect and frequency of intoxication. Drinking for enjoyment was positively associated with the frequency of binge drinking, frequency of intoxication, and average daily ethanol consumption. However, the relationship between drinking for enjoyment and average daily ethanol consumption was stronger among those with no alcohol disorder compared to those with DSM-IV alcohol dependence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Ethnic and sex bias in primary care screening tests for alcohol use disorders

BACKGROUND: The use of self-report screening tests for alcohol use disorders in the primary care setting has been advocated. OBJECTIVE: To test for ethnic and sex bias in three self-report screening tests for alcohol use disorders in a primary care population. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with patients randomly selected from appointment lists. SETTING: University-based family practice clinic. PATIENTS: Probability sample of 1333 adult family practice patients stratified by sex and ethnicity. MEASUREMENTS: Patients completed 1) a diagnostic interview to determine the presence of a current alcohol use disorder and 2) three screening tests: the CAGE questionnaire, the Self-Administered Alcoholism Screening Test (SAAST), and the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). RESULTS: The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the CAGE questionnaire and the SAAST ranged from 0.61 to 0.88 and were particularly poor for African-American men and Mexican-American women. For the AUDIT, the area under the ROC curves was greater than 0.90 for each patient subgroup. The sensitivity of the CAGE questionnaire and the SAAST at standard cut-points was lowest for Mexican-American women (0.21 and 0.13, respectively). Positive likelihood ratios for the AUDIT were similar to or higher than those for the other screening tests, whereas negative likelihood ratios were lowest for the AUDIT (<0.33), indicating the superiority of this test in ruling out a disorder. CONCLUSIONS: A marked inconsistency in the accuracy of common self-report screening tests for alcohol use disorders was found when these tests were used in a single clinical site with male and female family practice patients of different ethnic backgrounds. The AUDIT does not seem to be affected by ethnic and sex bias.     

Prognostic value of some biochemical and immunologic factors in the management of multiple myeloma

The aim of this study was to measure serum carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) in consecutive patients attending a general medical clinic with a range of alcohol intakes to determine its value in assessing such intake. Eighty-one consecutive patients (42 male, 39 female) aged 20-85 years (median = 49.5 years) attending an out-patient clinic were selected for the study. Each patient completed an alcohol diary detailing the units of alcohol consumed in the previous week, a CAGE questionnaire and an alcohol history, and underwent conventional blood tests including mean corpuscular volume (MCV), liver function tests, and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT). CDT was estimated using an enzyme immunoassay (CDTect, Pharmacia). The group comprised of 17 teetotallers, 28 light (<100 g/week), 23 moderate (100-400 g/week), and 13 heavy (>400 g/week) drinkers. Median serum CDT for heavy drinkers (25.5 U/l) was significantly higher than for the rest (median = 17 U/l, Kruskal-Wallis test, P = 0.01). Serum CDT correlated significantly with the CAGE score (Mann-Whitney test, P = 0.01), but poorly with alcohol diary records (r = 0.1, P = 0.4). However the correlations between GGT and diary records (r = 0.43, P = 0.001) and MCV with diary records (r = 0.5, P < 0.001) were significant. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value for elevated serum CDT were 69, 81 and 41% respectively in detecting heavy drinking. The positive predictive values for the various parameters were 43% for elevated serum GGT, 41% for raised erythrocyte MCV, and 75% for a positive score on the CAGE questionnaire. When a combination of the markers CDT, GGT, and MCV was used, elevation in two of the three markers detected heavy drinking with sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 88%, and positive predictive value of 61%. We conclude that, in out-patients with a wide range of alcohol intakes conventional markers such as serum GGT and erythrocyte MCV were more suitable than serum CDT for assessing alcohol intake. Serum CDT when used in combination with serum GGT and erythrocyte MCV was useful in detecting heavy drinking. The importance of careful history-taking including a standardized questionnaire is emphasized.     

Cue exposure in moderation drinking: A comparison with cognitive–behavior therapy.

To date, the published controlled trials on exposure to alcohol cues have had an abstinence treatment goal. A modification of cue exposure (CE) for moderation drinking, which incorporated priming doses of alcohol, could train participants to stop drinking after 2 to 3 drinks. This study examined the effects of modified CE within sessions, combined with directed homework practice. Nondependent problem drinkers who requested a moderation drinking goal were randomly allocated to modified CE or standard cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) for alcohol abuse. Both interventions were delivered in 6 90-min group sessions. Eighty-one percent of eligible participants completed treatment and follow-up assessment. Over 6 months, CE produced significantly greater reductions than CBT in participants' reports of drinking frequency and consumption on each occasion. No pretreatment variables significantly predicted outcome. The modified CE procedure appears viable for nondependent drinkers who want to adopt a moderate drinking goal. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Sexual abuse and the subsequent development of alcohol problems

The literature on sexual abuse and alcohol problems has been reviewed. Various methodological issues are relevant in determining whether there is merely an association or also a causal relationship. These include the definition of sexual abuse, the degree and timing of abuse, the methods of data collection, sample selection, the presence or absence of control groups, possible recall bias, difficulties with prospective studies for this subject, and the definition of alcohol misuse or dependence. Results with community and victim samples are conflicting, but studies on samples of problem drinkers suggest an association between severe alcohol problems and previous sexual abuse, at least in women. The association may be especially strong for earlier and more severe forms of sexual abuse. Possible mechanisms for an association were examined and are: (1) sexual abuse as a cause of alcohol misuse; (2) alcohol misuse predisposing people to sexual assault; (3) sexual assault and alcohol misuse both resulting from another factor; (4) sexual abuse predisposing to other conditions associated with alcohol misuse; and (5) an artefactual association. Regardless of the role of sexual abuse in causing alcohol problems, the available evidence suggests that victims of sexual abuse may present to services with more problematical patterns of drinking and more concurrent psychiatric disorder.     

Screening for problem alcohol drinking in the Swiss population: comparison between an ISPA-developed instrument and the CAGE questionnaire. The Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcoholism

In 1987, the Swiss Institute for the Prevention of Alcohol and Drug Problems (SIPA) developed a set of questions on alcohol-related problems in the general population. The aim of this article is to study the results of the questionnaire used as a screening instrument to detect problem drinking in the Swiss population, and to compare it with the CAGE test. The sample consisted of 953 people aged 20 or over. Among the drinkers (89% of the sample), 91 males (21.7%) and 34 females (8.7%) had a positive SIPA test and 53 males (12.7%) and 17 females (4.3%) a positive CAGE test. The SIPA test was more sensitive than the CAGE in detecting persons who drink regularly and quite heavily but without binge drinking. The item "Eye-opener" of the CAGE is too blunt for application to the Swiss general population and could with advantage be removed from the questionnaire. Females tend to deny alcohol problems much more than males. Binge drinking increases the risk of a positive test (SIPA: OR: 1.9; i.c. 95%: 1.2-3.0; CAGE: OR: 3.3; i.c. 95%: 1.8-6.0). In short, the SIPA test is more suitable in estimating the number of problem drinkers in the Swiss population than the CAGE, which was initially developed for the American medical population. Furthermore, the results suggest the necessity of using a different cut-off for each gender.     

A critical evaluation of several alcohol screening instruments using the CIDI-SAM as a criterion measure

Four alcohol screening instruments (the AUDIT, CAGE, MAST, and Svanum's scale) were administered to a sample of 306 undergraduate students at a Midwestern university and were compared with regard to several test characteristics, using the alcohol section of the CIDI-SAM (DSM-IV version) as the criterion measure. The performance of these instruments was evaluated using two subsets of subjects: (1) students who currently met diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence (n = 35); and (2) students who met diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence in the past and/or at present (i.e., lifetime diagnosis; n = 50). The AUDIT performed significantly better than the other three instruments in identifying students who were currently alcohol dependent, providing a moderate degree of clinical utility with this group. The four instruments did not differ significantly in their ability to identify students with a lifetime diagnosis; each measure provided only a modest degree of clinical utility with this group.     

Progression of consequences among heavy-drinking college students.

Among a sample of 180 male and 226 female undergraduates, 84.2% reported a heavy drinking episode (5+ drinks for men, 4+ for women) within the previous 90 days. Principal-components analysis revealed 3 alcohol-related problem factors among the heavy drinkers (Careless Behavior, Risky/Reckless Behavior, and Authority Problems). Nearly all heavy drinkers experienced a careless behavior that was due to drinking (92.7%), and many reported a risky/reckless behavior (60.2%), yet only one third (33.9%) experienced an authority problem. Guttman scaling procedures revealed a progression from Careless Behavior to Reckless/Risky Behavior to an Authority Problem. Heavy drinkers with an authority problem drank more frequently, consumed more when drinking, endorsed more alcohol expectancies, and reported earlier ages of initial and regular drinking than other groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Reasons for drinking, alcohol use, and alcoholism among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites.

Estimated associations of subjective reasons for drinking with heavy drinking (HD), frequent drinking (FD), and alcohol abuse or dependence (AAOD). Respondents were 725 Mexican-American and 915 non-Hispanic White community residents who reported drinking at least once in the 6 mo before being interviewed. Each reason for drinking and number of reasons given for drinking were associated with HD, FD, or AAOD. However, multivariate models suggested that different reasons may be associated with different types of alcohol involvement. Cultural differences in alcohol involvement were typically not accounted for by cultural differences in reasons for drinking. Drinking to cheer up or to loosen up around people and drinking to induce sleep had different associations with HD and AAOD in different cultural groups. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.

Nationally, college drinkers exhibit the highest rates of alcohol consumption and represent the largest percentage of problem drinkers. Group motivational enhancement therapy (GMET) has been found to catalyze problem drinking reductions among college student samples. Although research supporting the use of single-session GMET in college samples (general and mandated) is emergent, no studies have evaluated a comprehensive model of the potential active ingredients of this group intervention. College students (N = 206; 88% White; 63% men; M age = 18.6) mandated to a university alcohol diversion program were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: the standard-of-care 2-session “Focus on Alcohol Concerns” education group (FAC), a single GMET, or a single alcohol information-only control group (AI) to evaluate the role of 5 putative mediators: readiness to change, self-efficacy, perceived risk, norm estimates, and positive drinking expectancies. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, GMET students demonstrated greater reductions in problem drinking outcomes (drinks per drinking day, hazardous drinking symptoms, and alcohol-related problems). Of the 5 mediators proposed, only self-efficacy emerged as a significant mediator. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers.

This study consisted of a randomized controlled trial of a 1-session motivational intervention for college student binge drinkers. Sixty students who reported binge drinking 2 or more times in the past 30 days were randomly assigned to either a no-treatment control or a brief intervention group. The intervention provided students with feedback regarding personal consumption, perceived drinking norms, alcohol-related problems, situations associated with heavy drinking, and alcohol expectancies. At 6-week follow-up, the brief intervention group exhibited significant reductions on number of drinks consumed per week, number of times drinking alcohol in the past month, and frequency of binge drinking in the past month. Estimates of typical student drinking mediated these reductions. This study replicates earlier research on the efficacy of brief interventions with college students and extends previous work regarding potential mechanisms of change. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)     

Prevalence of alcohol dependence and abuse in general practice

The aim of this study is to deliver representative epidemiological data about the prevalence of alcohol abuse and dependence in general practices in an urban area. In 12 general practices at Luebeck, a Northern German city with 220,000 inhabitants, a total of 929 patients (aged between 14 and 75 years) were screened using the CAGE and the Short Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. If one of these screening questionnaires or the General Practitioners' assessment of the patient indicated an alcohol problem, the patient underwent a standardized diagnostic interview using the alcohol section of the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry. The prevalence rates according to ICD-10 or DSM-III-R were 3.5% for alcohol abuse and 7.2% for alcohol dependence, the sex ratio was 1:2.8 (female:male). These results are compared with previous findings, and general epidemiological implications of this study are discussed.