Influence of food on the oral bioavailability of loratadine and pseudoephedrine from extended-release tablets in healthy volunteers

The effect of a high-fat breakfast on the bioavailability of the components of an extended-release tablet containing 10 mg loratadine in the immediate-release coating and 240 mg pseudoephedrine sulfate in the extended-release core was studied in 24 healthy male volunteers in a single-dose, two-way crossover study. The drug was administered after a 10-hour overnight fast or within 5 minutes of consuming a standardized high-fat breakfast. Serial blood samples were collected over a 48-hour period, and plasma was analyzed for loratadine and its active metabolite descarboethoxyloratadine (DCL), and pseudoephedrine. For pseudoephedrine, maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUCzero-infinity) were similar after both treatments, indicating no relevant food effect on the bioavailability of pseudoephedrine. Also, the absorption profiles of pseudoephedrine (from Wagner-Nelson analysis) were similar for the fed and fasted treatments, indicating no apparent differences in absorption. Plasma concentration-time profiles and values for Cmax and AUCzero-infinity of DCL were similar for the two treatments, indicating no relevant food effect on the pharmacokinetics of DCL. In contrast, for loratadine, administration with food resulted in a significantly increased mean Cmax (53%) and AUC from time zero to the final quantifiable sample (AUCif) (76%). However, the resultant Cmax and AUC of loratadine under fed conditions were well below those previously obtained at steady-state after multiple-dose administration of loratadine (40 mg/day) that were shown to be safe and well-tolerated in several clinical studies. The effect of food on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profiles of the components of a combination loratadine/pseudoephedrine extended-release tablet is not likely to be clinically significant.     

The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of clemastine and phenylpropanolamine in single-component and combination formulations

Studies were conducted in healthy male volunteers (n = 171; age range, 19-49 years; 22-27 subjects per study) to examine the following: pharmacokinetics and dose proportionality of the antihistamine clemastine; the effect of coadministration of phenylpropanolamine and clemastine on the pharmacokinetics of the two drugs; and the bioavailability of clemastine tablets and combination tablets of clemastine and sustained-release phenyl-propanolamine under fasted and fed conditions after single-dose administration and at steady state. All studies used crossover designs, with randomized drug treatments separated by a 7-day washout period for the single-dose studies, and with administration every 6 or 12 hours for 7 days per treatment for the steady-state studies. After single oral doses of clemastine solution (1,2, and 4 mg), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were dose proportional. Clemastine showed a first-pass reduction in the extent of absorption, with oral bioavailability calculated as 39.2 +/- 12.4%. Extravascular distribution of drug was suggested by the high volume of distribution (799 +/- 315 L) and low Cmax (0.577 +/- 0.252 ng/mL/mg) observed at 4.77 +/- 2.26 hours after administration, and by the biphasic decline in plasma concentration. The terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) of clemastine was 21.3 +/- 11.6 hours. Steady-state concentrations of clemastine were consistent with linear pharmacokinetic processes, and clearance was unaffected by age in the range studied, or by race. Clemastine solution and tablets were bioequivalent, and food had no significant effect on rate and extent of absorption of clemastine. The 1- and 2-mg clemastine tablets showed proportional bioavailability. Coadministration of clemastine with phenylpropanolamine did not significantly influence the pharmacokinetics of clemastine or the AUC and elimination t1/2 of phenylpropanolamine, but reduced the rate of absorption of phenylpropanolamine. Combination tablets containing 1 mg or 2 mg of immediate-release clemastine plus 75 mg of sustained-release phenylpropanolamine for twice daily administration were bioequivalent to the separate components and showed no significant interaction with food.     

Pharmacokinetics and effect of food on the bioavailability of orally administered venlafaxine

Venlafaxine is a unique antidepressant currently under evaluation for treatment of various affective disorders. The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of venlafaxine were evaluated in healthy volunteers after oral administration. The bioavailability of 50 mg of venlafaxine as a tablet relative to a solution was determined in a two-period randomized crossover study. The rate of absorption from the gastrointestinal tract was assessed by the time to peak plasma concentration (tmax), a model-dependent calculation of the first-order absorption rate constant, and a model-independent calculation of mean residence time. The extent of absorption was assessed by peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two formulations for either the rate or extent of absorption. Similarly, systemic concentrations of the active O-demethylated metabolite did not significantly differ after administration of the two venlafaxine formulations. AUC ratios indicated that the relative bioavailabilities of the parent drug, and formulation of metabolite were approximately 98% and 92%, respectively, for the tablet versus the solution. A separate study was conducted to examine the influence of food on venlafaxine absorption from the 50-mg tablet. A standard, medium-fat breakfast eaten immediately before drug administration delayed the tmax of venlafaxine but did not affect Cmax or AUC. Therefore the tablet formulation of venlafaxine is bioequivalent to the oral solution, and the presence of food appears to decrease the rate but not the extent of absorption of venlafaxine from the tablet formulation.     

Classification of infective endocarditis by Duke''s criteria and transesophageal echocardiography: a 1-year retrospective analysis

The effects of a high-fat meal on the bioavailability of oxycodone hydrochloride, administered as a recently developed 40 mg controlled-release (CR) tablet or a 20 mg immediate-release (IR) solution, were evaluated in a randomized crossover study in 22 normal male and female subjects. Serial blood samples were collected for 36 h after dosing and analyzed for oxycodone by a validated method using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. There was no significant food effect with CR oxycodone as judged by 90% confidence interval (CI) analysis of AUC0-infinity and Cmax values under fed and fasted conditions. For the IR solution, both oxycodone bioavailability and peak plasma oxycodone concentration were significantly altered by consumption of the high-fat meal, with the mean value for AUC0-infinity increasing to 120% (CI = 109-132%) and the mean value for Cmax decreasing to 82% (CI = 47-91%) of values observed in the fasted condition. Adverse events reported for both formulations were mostly mild to moderate in severity and typical of those observed with opioids.     

Effect of food on the bioavailability of stavudine in subjects with human immunodeficiency virus infection

A randomized, three-way crossover study was carried out to determine the effects of food ingestion on the pharmacokinetics of stavudine (d4T). Fifteen subjects with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and CD4(+) cell counts of >/=200/microliter received 70 mg of d4T in a fasting state or 1 h before or 5 min after a standardized high-fat breakfast. A 7- to 15-day washout period was included between treatments. Blood and urine were collected before and for 10 h after dosing, and plasma and urine d4T concentrations were determined with a validated radioimmunoassay. Plasma drug concentration-time data were analyzed with a noncompartmental model. The mean maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax) and the time to Cmax (Tmax) for administration of d4T after a meal were significantly lower and longer (P = 0.0001 for both measures) than those observed in the fasting state, although the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) was not significantly different. Neither of these parameters was significantly altered when d4T was taken 1 h before a meal. The bioavailability of d4T taken after a meal was 95% of that observed in the fasting state, and it was 97% when d4T was administered before a meal (P > 0.05 for both comparisons with the fasting state). The results of this study indicate that (i) ingestion of food does not affect the bioavailability of d4T and that patients with HIV infection can take it without regard to meals, and (ii) absorption is essentially complete within 1 h when d4T is administered in the fasted state.     

Differential changes in copy numbers of rice mitochondrial plasmid-like DNAs and main mitochondrial genomic DNAs that depend on temperature

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low-dose methotrexate (MTX) in the early phase (3 months) after the start of antipsoriatic therapy. METHODS: Ten male and female psoriatic patients who failed to respond to previous conventional therapy were treated with 15 mg oral MTX once per week. The pharmacokinetics in plasma and the urinary excretion of MTX and 7-hydroxymethotrexate (7-OH MTX) were investigated after doses 1, 5 and 13 (corresponding to phases I, II and III, respectively). On the same occasions, MTX accumulation in erythrocytes obtained before MTX administration was investigated. Pharmacodynamics of MTX were evaluated using the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score. RESULTS: There were marked intersubject differences (range of coefficients of variation 34.9-76.3%) in the area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax) and clearance (CL) of MTX. Total CL was proportional to renal clearance (CLR) (r2 = 0.735, P < 0.0001) which accounted for 73 (19)% of the former. There was a strong linear relationship (r2 = 0.819, P < 0.0001) between CL of MTX and creatinine clearance. Within 48 h of drug administration, the urinary excretion of MTX was 46-99% of the dose, while that of 7-OH MTX was 1.5-8.6%. In 8 of 10 patients, more than 70% of the MTX dose was recovered. No intraindividual variations of MTX kinetic parameters during treatment were observed. MTX concentrations in erythrocytes reached the steady-state concentration in the range 40.7-170 nmol.l(-1) after 2 months of therapy. Pharmacodynamic measurement versus pharmacokinetics revealed a significant inverse relationship between PASI score and MTX AUC (rs = -0.912, P < 0.002) and between PASI score and erythrocytic MTX (rs = -0.988, P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: The relationship between MTX pharmacokinetics (AUC or erythrocytic MTX) and pharmacodynamics (PASI score) may exist. It is likely that the efficacy of psoriasis therapy with MTX could be improved by adjusting the dose according to plasma concentrations obtained after the first MTX administration.     

Gemfibrozil decreases autoantibodies against oxidized low-density lipoprotein in men with combined hyperlipidaemia

The pharmacokinetics of the non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs are influenced by circadian rhythms and ketoprofen (K) absorption by food, to investigate the influence of these two factors, 12 subjects were treated, in random order, orally by a fast release tablet (FR 100 mg), by a fast-slow release tablet (FSR 150 mg) and by an intramuscular solution (i.m. 100 mg). The 3 treatments were administered, with a standardized meal, at 8 h a.m and 8 h p.m, and also at 1 h p.m with FR. The daily dosing was 300 mg by oral administration and 200 mg by i.m. route. Serum concentration profiles of K were determined by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters of K were not modified by the time of intramuscular injection. The oral absorption of K (Tmax) was significantly delayed at 1 h p.m and more even at 8 h p.m. The maximal serum concentration (Cmax) was significantly decreased at 1 h p.m (about 50%, p < 0.001) and also at 8 h p.m. The oral bioavailability, evaluated by the area under the K serum concentration curve, was not modified, those of FSR was significantly lower than FR (6%, p < 0.05). This study shows that the time of K administration delayed the Tmax and food decreased the Cmax without loss of bioavailability.     

Oral ganciclovir dosing in transplant recipients and dialysis patients based on renal function

BACKGROUND: An oral formulation of ganciclovir (GCV) was recently approved for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. This study was designed to determine the bioavailability of GCV and to test a dosing algorithm in transplant and dialysis patients with different levels of renal function. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic studies were carried out in 23 patients who were either a recipient of an organ transplant or on hemodialysis. Drug dosing was established by the following algorithm based on calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl): CrCl = [(140-age) x body weight]/(72 x Cr) x 0.85 for women that is, CrCl >50 ml/min, 1000 mg every 8 hr; CrCl of 25-50 ml/min, 1000 mg every 24 hr; CrCl of 10-24 ml/ min, 500 mg every day; CrCl < 10 ml/min (or on dialysis), 500 mg every other day after dialysis. GCV was taken within 30 min after a meal. The patients received oral GCV for between 12 days and 14 weeks. Serum specimens (or plasma from patients on hemodialysis) obtained at steady state were analyzed for GCV concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. In nine of the transplant recipients, absolute bioavailability was determined by comparing GCV levels after single oral and intravenous doses of GCV. RESULTS: The following GCV concentrations (mean +/-SD) were determined: with CrCl of > or =70 ml/min, the minimum steady-state concentration (Cmin) and maximum concentration (Cmax) were 0.78+/-0.46 microg/ml and 1.42+/-0.37 microg/ml, respectively, with a 24-hr area under the concentration time curve (AUC0-24) of 24.7+/-7.8 microg x hr/ml; with CrCl of 50-69 ml/min, the Cmin and Cmax were 1.93+/-0.48 and 2.57+/-0.39 microg/ml, respectively, with an AUC0-24 of 52.1+/-10.1 microg x hr/ml; with CrCl of 25-50 ml/min, the Cmin and Cmax were 0.41+/-0.27 and 1.17+/-0.32 microg/ml, respectively, with an AUC0-24 of 14.6+/-7.4 microg x hr/ml. For one patient with a CrCl of 23.8 ml/min, the Cmin and Cmax were 0.32 and 0.7 microg/ml, respectively, with an AUC0-24 of 10.7 microg x hr/ml. With CrCl of <10 ml/min, the mean Cmin and Cmax were 0.75+/-0.42 and 1.59+/-0.55 microg/ml, respectively, with a mean AUC0-24 of 64.6+/-18.8 microg x hr/ml. Absolute bioavailability, for the nine patients so analyzed, was 7.2+/-2.4%. For those patients with end-stage renal failure, GCV concentrations fell during dialysis from a mean of 1.47+/-0.48 microg/ml before dialysis to 0.69+/-0.38 microg/ml after dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability of oral GCV in transplant patients was similar to that observed in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. However, levels between 0.5 and 1 microg/ml (within the IC50 of most cytomegalovirus isolates) could be achieved with tolerable oral doses. The proposed dosing algorithm resulted in adequate levels for patients with CrCl greater than 50 ml/min and for patients on dialysis. For patients with CrCl between 10 and 50 ml/min, the levels achieved were low and these patients would likely benefit from increased doses.     

Initial concentration-time profile of gentamicin determines efficacy against Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047

In vitro studies were designed to investigate the influence of peak drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and, consequently, the trough concentration on the bactericidal effects of gentamicin against Enterobacter cloacae (MIC, 0.5 mg/liter) by simulating bolus versus infusion administration and bolus dosing with altered drug clearance. Bacteria in the lag phase were exposed to gentamicin concentration-time profiles modelling either bolus or infusion dosing (AUC constant, Cmax changing) with 30-min postdose peak concentrations (Cpeak30) of 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/liter or bolus dosing with normal and double drug clearance (Cmax constant, AUC changing) corresponding to normal clearance profiles with Cpeak30 of 6 and 8 mg/liter. Exposure to gentamicin caused early bactericidal effects apparent by 2 h, followed by variable bacteriostatic and recovery phases. Exposure to bolus profiles resulted in greater bactericidal activity than the corresponding infusion profile up to a Cpeak30 of 8 mg/liter. At a Cpeak30 of 10 mg/liter, there were no differences in bactericidal effect. Double clearance profiles had a reduced bactericidal effect at 6 mg/liter compared to the corresponding normal clearance profile, but no differences in bactericidal effect were observed for 8-mg/liter double and normal clearance profiles. These results suggest that the initial exposure (i.e., 0 to 30 min) is a more important determinant for bacterial killing than the AUC or trough concentration for this bacterium. Subject to confirmation of these findings with other gram-negative bacteria, to optimize aminoglycoside efficacy the initial exposure (Cmax) should be maximized by giving higher doses or bolus administration at intervals which may not produce detectable trough concentrations. Clinical trials with a broad range of patients, especially those with higher clearance, would confirm these in vitro observations and define optimal dosing recommendations.     

Lack of interaction between bromfenac and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics of methotrexate (MTX) and bromfenac administered separately or coadministered in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients received their usual weekly oral dose of MTX on Days 1 and 8 and bromfenac 50 mg every 8 h from Days 4 to 9. On Days 1 and 8 serial blood and urine samples were collected to study the pharmacokinetics of MTX and 7-hydroxymethotrexate (7-OHMTX). Bromfenac pharmacokinetics were studied on Days 7 and 8. Concentrations of the analytes were assayed using validated high performance liquid chromatography methods. RESULTS: Nine patients, 5 women and 4 men, completed the study. No statistically significant changes were observed in any of the pharmacokinetic variables evaluated for bromfenac with or without MTX. Bromfenac also did not alter the pharmacokinetics of low dose MTX. However, some significant changes were observed in the pharmacokinetics of 7-hydroxymethotrexate: a 30% increase in dose normalized area under the serum concentration time curve (mean +/- SD) to 3102 +/- 1397 micrograms.h/l and a 16% decrease in renal clearance to 10.0 +/- 6.7 ml/h/kg. Eight patients had mild or moderate adverse events: most were considered unrelated to the study drug by the investigator. One patient did not complete the study because of moderate hypertension. No patient had clinically important abnormal laboratory test results. CONCLUSION: No clinically significant changes in MTX pharmacokinetics were detected in patients with RA when bromfenac was added to MTX therapy. Although 7-OHMTX concentrations were elevated, the changes were small and unlikely to be of clinical significance. MTX did not alter the pharmacokinetics of bromfenac.     

Bayesian calculation of methotrexate clearance after low dose intramuscular administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine a pharmacokinetic procedure (Bayesian method) for estimation of methotrexate (MTX) clearance, using only 2 blood samples, in outpatients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with low dose intramuscular (i.m.) MTX. METHODS: Population pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained by the weighted least squares (WLSQ) method in plasma samples from 14 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In each patient, 11 samples were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay, at Time 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after i.m. administration. These measures were validated by pharmacokinetic studies in 20 other patients with RA. Individual total body clearance of MTX was calculated using only 2 plasma samples (at 0.5 and 2 h after i.m. injection) by the Bayesian method using the population pharmacokinetic parameters. The clearance measures obtained by the Bayesian method were compared with those obtained by the WLSQ method. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic variables (clearance, half-life, area under the curve) of 14 patients were determined, as well as the covariance and the mean values necessary to apply the Bayesian method. No significant difference was found between clearance values obtained by the Bayesian method compared to the WLSQ method, confirming the validity of the Bayesian values. CONCLUSION: The present population pharmacokinetic parameters allowed the determination of individual clearance of MTX with only 2 plasma samples (0.5 and 2 h after administration) in patients treated with low dose im MTX. Individual clearance is used to modulate MTX administration in patients presenting adverse reactions in spite of good clinical response. Individual determination of MTX pharmacokinetics in patients at risk for adverse MTX reactions could be useful for adjustment of the drug regimen.     

Pharmacokinetics and safety of propiverine in patients with fatty liver disease

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics of propiverine after single and multiple dosing in patients with and without fatty liver disease. METHODS: The serum concentration-time curves of propiverine and its main metabolite propiverine-N-oxide were investigated in 12 patients with mild to moderate impairment of liver function (mean antipyrine clearance 26.0 ml x min(-1)) and in 12 controls (antipyrine clearance 42.8 ml x min(-1)). Subjects were treated orally with propiverine hydrochloride (Mictonorm) for 5 days (15 mg t. i. d.) to reach steady state. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed for propiverine and its main metabolite with regard to peak serum concentration (Cmax), area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) and elimination half-life (t1/2). Adverse events were reported by 12 patients. Five patients with fatty liver disease and seven patients with normal liver function complained of dry mouth and/or blurred vision. All adverse events reported were transient and mild. CONCLUSION: No pharmacokinetic differences relevant for safety were observed, comparing patients with and without fatty liver disease following repeated oral administration of propiverine. Thus there seems to be no need to adjust the dose in patients with mild to moderate impairment of liver function.     

Pharmacokinetics of clentiazem after intravenous and oral administration in healthy subjects

This study characterized the pharmacokinetics of clentiazem (CLZ) after a single intravenous bolus (IV) and oral (PO) dose in humans. Twenty-four healthy male subjects (28.5 +/- 5.2 years; 77 +/- 8.2 kg) received IV (20 mg) and PO (80 mg) doses of CLZ as part of a four-way, randomized, complete crossover study. Serial blood samples were drawn up to 48 hours after administration of the drug. Plasma samples were analyzed for CLZ and three metabolites by a high-pressure liquid chromatography method. The values (mean [CV, %]) for systemic clearance, volume of distribution at steady-state, and half-life of CLZ were 63.6 L/hour (23.5), 756.1 L (19.1), and 10.6 hours (33.1), respectively, after IV administration. The peak plasma CLZ concentration (Cmax) and time to Cmax were 37.0 ng/mL (38.7) and 3.7 hours (22.9), respectively, with a lag time after PO administration. The absolute bioavailability of PO CLZ was 45% (30.7). The ratio of area under the curve of N-desmethyl CLZ to that of CLZ increased from 0.15 (57.0) after IV to 0.60 (21.4) after PO administration, suggesting a significant first-pass effect. The mean residence time and mean absorption time of CLZ were 12.3 hours (24.3) and 3.1 hours (88.1), respectively. The plasma concentration-time data of CLZ can be described by either a one- or two-compartment pharmacokinetic model.     

Bioavailability of dextromethorphan (as dextrorphan) from sustained release formulations in the presence of guaifenesin in human volunteers

A multiple dose bioavailability study with six healthy male human volunteers was conducted. The bioavailability of an experimental sustained release tablet containing dextromethorphan hydrobromide (DXP-HBr), was compared with a marketed sustained release DXP-HBr suspension in a three-way crossover study. Plasma samples, collected serially after oral drug administration, were analysed for the major metabolite of dextromethorphan (DXP), dextrorphan (DX), using a specific HPLC method with fluorescence detection. The bioavailability parameters; area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to peak (Tmax), were obtained from the plasma concentration-time data. Additionally, pharmacokinetic parameters such as mean residence time (MRT), accumulation factor (R), fluctuation index (Fi), total body clearance (Cl), and the average concentration (C) were estimated by using model independent kinetics approach. Analysis of variance of the data revealed that the presence of guaifenesin in the test formulation does not appear to have a statistically significant (p > 0.05) effect on the bioavailability of dextromethorphan as dextrorphan. The relative bioavailability of the tablet dosage form with respect to the suspension was found to be 113% on Day 1 and 110% on Day 6.     

Effect of timing of food on absorption of cefpodoxime proxetil

The effect of a high-fat meal and the timing of this meal on the absorption of a 400-mg oral dose of cefpodoxime proxetil was evaluated in 20 healthy, adult, male volunteers in a four-way crossover study. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve, peak plasma concentration, and urinary recovery were significantly greater (P = .0001) after administration of cefpodoxime proxetil tablets with and 2 hours after a meal relative to dosing under fasted conditions or 1 hour before a meal. The time to peak concentration did not differ significantly among treatments, which suggests that food did not affect the rate of drug absorption. These results indicate that absorption of cefpodoxime proxetil is enhanced when tablets are taken with food or shortly after a meal.     

Influence of gastrointestinal site of drug delivery on the absorption characteristics of ranitidine

The absorption characteristics of ranitidine after delivery to three locations in the gastrointestinal tract were compared in an open-label study of eight healthy males. Subjects received ranitidine HCl (150 mg) for injection via a nasoenteric tube directly into their stomach, jejunum, or cecum sequentially in three separate periods (24 hr apart). Plasma samples were collected at periodic time intervals for 12 hr following each dosing and analyzed for ranitidine concentration by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mean concentrations following cecal dosing were lower (P less than 0.05) than concentrations following gastric or jejunal dosing at each sampling time except baseline. Mean concentrations following gastric and jejunal dosing were similar except at 2 hr (gastric greater than jejunal). Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for cecal administration were different (P less than 0.05) from either the gastric or the jejunal periods with the exception of Tmax. There was no difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter after gastric or jejunal dosing. The relative bioavailability after cecal administration was less than 15% of that observed after administration into the stomach or jejunum. Additionally, Wagner-Nelson analysis indicated that the rate of ranitidine absorption was much slower following cecal administration than after gastric or jejunal dosing. Two plasma concentration peaks were observed in three of eight subjects after gastric dosing, in eight of eight subjects after jejunal dosing, and in zero of eight subjects after cecal dosing. These data demonstrate that the absorption profile of ranitidine is equivalent, in extent and duration, after delivery to the stomach or jejunum, while absorption from the cecum is significantly less.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparative bioavailability of two atenolol tablet formulations in healthy male volunteers after a single dose administration

The bioavailability of 2 atenolol tablet formulations (Angipress from Laboratórios Biosintética, and Atenol from Wellcome ICI Laboratory, Brazil) were compared in 18 healthy male volunteers who received a single 50 mg dose of each atenolol formulation. The study was conducted following an open randomized 2-period crossover design with a 14-day washout interval between doses. Plasma samples were obtained over a 24-hour interval and atenolol concentrations were determined by HPLC with fluorimetric detection. From the plasma atenolol concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained: AUC(zero-24) (area under the concentration vs time curves from 0-24 h), ke (terminal elimination constant), t1/2 (terminal first order elimination half-life), AUC (area under the concentration vs time curves extrapolated to infinity), Cmax (maximum achieved concentration), Tmax (time to achieve Cmax) and Cmax/AUC. All these variables were analyzed using both parametric and nonparametric statistics. Geometric mean Angipress/Atenol individual percent ratios were 99.6% for AUC(zero-24), 99.7% for AUC, 98.0% for Cmax, 102.8% for t1/2, 97.2% for ke and 97.8% for Cmax/AUC, with all their 90% confidence intervals within the bioequivalence range 80-125%, thus showing similar patterns of absorption and disposition. Arithmetic mean for individual Tmax differences was 0.8 h, and the 90% confidence interval did not include the zero value. Based on these results and in accordance with the European Union and the US Food and Drug Administration bioequivalence requirements we conclude that both atenolol formulations are bioequivalent for both the extent and the rate of absorption.     

Bilateral isolated metastases of malignant melanoma to the cerebellopontine angle

PURPOSE: Peak drug concentration (Cmax) measures the extremity of drug exposure and is a secondary indicator of the extent of absorption after area under the concentration time curve (AUC). Cmax serves as the indicator of absorption rate in bioequivalence (BE) studies in the US (1). The use of Cmax, not the time to Cmax (Tmax), as the metric to assess absorption rate causes erratic inferences in BE studies, and incorrect conclusions for some. We can improve BE efficiency (i.e., get the answer right the first time), by properly analyzing the time to Cmax (Tmax) instead of Cmax. METHODS: We have previously redirected attention to Tmax as the unconfounded absorption rate variable, instead of Cmax, and have called for equally spaced sampling times during the suspected absorption phase to improve the performance of the rate metric (2). Equal spacing converts Tmax easily into a count variable and we illustrated an appropriate statistical analysis for counts. This paper provides some measurement theory concepts to help judge which is the more appropriate analysis, and also provides parametric confidence limits for Tmax treatment differences. Three separate BE studies are then analyzed by both methods. RESULTS: By focusing on the differences in conclusions, or inferences, this paper identifies three major issues with the current FDA "recommended" analysis of BE studies. First, Cmax, a continuous variable peak-height or extent measure has usurped Tmax's function and performs erratically as a substitute measure for the rate of absorption. Second, Tmax, should be analyzed as a discrete attribute, not as a continuous variable. Third, since several extent measures (AUC, Cmax), not one, are actually being analyzed, an adjustment for multiple testing is mandatory if we are to maintain the size of the test at the desired alpha level (13), and not inadvertently use a narrower bioequivalence window than is intended. These actions all can have serious unintended consequences on inferences, including making inappropriate ones.     

True post-micturition urinary incontinence of the male

The effect of food on the bioavailability of brofaromine hydrochloride was investigated in a randomized cross-over study. Eight healthy male volunteers were given single peroral doses of 75 mg brofaromine hydrochloride after overnight fasting or a fat- and protein-rich breakfast. Mean (+/- SD) areas under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) were 9.66 (2.35) mumol l-1 h when given to the fasted volunteers and 11.82 (3.78) mumol l-1 h (p = 0.0413) when given after a substantial breakfast. Mean (+/- SD) maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were 0.71 (0.13) mumol l-1 when given to the fasted volunteers and 0.85 (0.22) mumol l-1 (p > 0.05) when given after breakfast. Thus, both the average AUC and Cmax were increased by approximately 20 per cent when brofaromine hydrochloride was given with food. The times when Cmax was reached (tmax) as well as the elimination half-lives were not influenced by concomitant intake of food. The tolerability was the same whether brofaromine was given before or after food in healthy volunteers. The slight effect of food on the bioavailability of brofaromine should be of little therapeutic consequence because of the observed wide inter-subject variability of the plasma levels.     

The novel anti-migraine compound zolmitriptan (Zomig 311C90) has no clinically significant interactions with paracetamol or metoclopramide

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated potential pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between the novel anti-migraine compound zolmitriptan (Zomig, formerly 311C90) and paracetamol and/or metoclopramide. METHODS: In an open-label, randomised, crossover study, 15 healthy volunteers received single oral doses of 10 mg zolmitriptan alone, 1 g paracetamol alone, 10 mg zolmitriptan + 1 g paracetamol, 10 mg zolmitriptan + 10 mg metoclopramide or 10 mg zolmitriptan + 1 g paracetamol + 10 mg metoclopramide on five separate occasions. RESULTS: Metoclopramide had no significant effects on the pharmacokinetics of zolmitriptan or the active zolmitriptan metabolite 183C91, nor did it affect interactions between zolmitriptan and paracetamol. Paracetamol marginally increased the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) (11%) and the area under the curve (AUC) (11%) and reduced the renal clearance of zolmitriptan (9%); similar small effects were seen on 183C91. The AUC, Cmax and half-life of paracetamol were reduced by concomitant zolmitriptan (by 11%, 31% and 8%, respectively), whilst the mean residence time showed a small increase (+0.7 h). There was a trend towards a transient increase in blood pressure following all regimens containing zolmitriptan; this effect was small, was consistent between all zolmitriptan regimens as well as with previous studies, and was considered to be clinically insignificant. Zolmitriptan was well tolerated after all treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of zolmitriptan and paracetamol resulted in a slight increase in bioavailability of zolmitriptan and a reduced rate and extent of paracetamol absorption. These findings are considered to be of no clinical significance and there is no reason to avoid concomitant administration of paracetamol and/or metoclopramide with zolmitriptan.