基于劈窗算法的Landsat 8影像地表温度反演

陆地表面温度（LST）是表征地表能量交换和地面特征的重要指标,目前遥感技术逐渐成为区域和全球尺度上LST反演的一种便捷工具,而采样不同算法及不同影像的热红外遥感LST反演研究层出不穷,其中基于Landsat数据的反演成果尤为突出。文章利用劈窗算法对Landsat 8遥感影像进行地表温度反演,对比探讨了根据经验值与借助MODIS热红外数据两种不同方式的LST反演结果,并进行北京市热红外波段辐射亮度温度比较,针对地表温度分级进行统计,分析了当地地表温度分布趋势。结果表明：劈窗算法下Landsat 8数据的反演温度更接近实际温度,精度较高且优于MODIS产品;北京市地表温度空间分布格局受地物结构与反射率所制约,高温区主要集中分布于中东部,中低温区分布与林地及水体分布结构较为吻合。     

MODIS地表温度产品的验证研究——以黑河流域为例

分析了影响MODIS地表温度产品精度的主要因素,并对这些因素综合作用下的MODIS地表温度产品的精度验证方法进行了回顾和比较。针对MODIS地表温度产品在干旱半干旱地区误差偏大的状况,以黑河流域为例,对MODIS地表温度产品进行了验证。用于验证的地面观测数据包括自动气象站红外辐射温度计数据和长波辐射数据。这里结合具体的...     

基于分组分裂窗算法的MTSAT-1R地表温度反演

以黑河流域上游和中游为研究区,针对MTSAT-1R卫星数据,运用MODTRAN 4.0及晴空状态下的TIGR大气廓线数据,发展了根据地表比辐射率、大气水汽含量、传感器观测角度分组模拟的分裂窗算法,进行地表温度反演。分析了传感器噪声、地表比辐射率和大气水汽含量3个参数对该算法的影响,并结合模拟数据、地面观测数据及MODIS地表温度产品,对反演结果进行分析评价。结果表明:当传感器垂直观测或大气水汽含量小于2.5g/cm2时,反演精度在1K以内;反演结果与地面观测数据对比差异较小,在阿柔站RMSE为3.7 K(日)/1.4 K(夜),在盈科站RMSE为2.4K(日)/2.0K(夜);与MODIS地表温度产品比较,空间分布呈现出一致性。总之,分组分裂窗算法能较好地用于MTSAT-1R卫星数据进行地表温度反演。     

基于MODIS数据的湖面温度反演算法精度对比研究——以太湖为例

以MODIS(Terra)影像数据为数据源,对比了不同分裂窗算法反演2012年太湖湖泊表面温度结果,并通过太湖水环境自动监测站网实测数据与不同算法结果进行了精度对比分析.结果表明,MODIS地表温度产品(Version 5)和覃志豪算法产品所反演的太湖表面温度精度都很高,其与实测数据的均方根误差分别为1.189℃和0.987℃.在综合数据获取、处理和适用性的基础上,研究认为,在水文、气象和生态等科学研究中可以直接利用MODIS地表温度产品(Version 5)来获取太湖地区的湖泊表面水温.     

基于MODIS 数据的南京市夏季城市热岛分析

城市热岛效应是当前城市环境与气候主要研究内容之一。地表温度与气温之间有紧密的联系, 通过遥感反演地表温度已成为研究城市热岛的有效手段。利用MODIS 数据, 获取地表比辐射率与大气透过率2 个基本参数, 运用劈窗算法反演南京市夏季地表温度。基于不同时相的MODIS数据, 对4 幅南京市地表温度反演图像作对比分析, 较好地显示了南京市城市热岛的空间分布、热岛范围和城市热岛强度, 结果表明南京市夏季热岛问题较为严重。     

陆地资源卫星数据地表温度反演

针对目前陆地资源卫星(Landsat-8)地表温度反演过程中,地表比辐射率估计和敏感度分析中存在的不足,对这两方面进行改进,提出了一种基于Landsat-8数据的地表温度反演算法。该文主要从劈窗算法的推导、参数的估计、敏感度分析等方面进行研究。对于大气透过率的计算,首先用与其有相邻过境时间的MODIS数据反演大气水汽含量,然后通过中分辨率的大气传输模型(Moderate Resolution Atmospheric Transmission,MODTRAN)模拟大气水汽含量与透过率的关系,最后得到大气透过率。对于发射率的计算,通过分类和ASTER提供的光谱库获得。将大气辐射传输方程模拟的地表温度与此劈窗算法反演的地表温度做比较,结果表明平均精度达到0.82K。最后研究了大气水汽含量对地表温度的影响。结果显示,当大气水汽含量误差为0.1g/cm2,其对温度反演精度的影响最大不超过0.3K;当大气水汽含量的反演误差较大的时候,其对温度反演精度的影响较大。     

基于Landsat系列数据地表温度反演算法对比分析——以齐齐哈尔市辖区为例

Landsat热红外系列数据是地表温度反演的一项重要数据源。以齐齐哈尔市辖区为研究区域,基于2002、2008和2016年Landsat TM/ETM+/TIRS系列数据,分别采用单窗算法(MW算法)、单通道算法(SC算法)和辐射传输方程法(RTE算法)进行地表温度反演及对比分析,并利用MODIS地表温度产品对反演结果进行精度验证。结果表明:(1)基于Landsat系列数据,3种算法反演得到的地表温度的空间分布状况一致,总体上市区地表温度较高,水体区域温度最低;(2)基于ETM+数据,SC和RTE算法结果一致性较好,其中SC算法精度最高,MW算法在不同地物覆被区误差均较大;(3)MW算法基于TM数据反演精度最高,RTE算法次之,SC算法较差;(4)基于Landsat 8TIRS数据,SC算法精度最高,RTE算法误差较大。     

喀斯特城市地表温度遥感反演算法比较

针对喀斯特城市快速扩展所引发的热环境问题,提出喀斯特山峰混合像元比辐射率估算方法,使Landsat 8遥感数据的地表温度反演算法适用于喀斯特城市,利用5种单通道算法和劈窗算法反演地表温度,分析反演精度和敏感性因子。结果表明:在我国南方喀斯特地区大气水分含量较高的情况下,单通道算法比劈窗算法精度更高,Jimenez单通道算法(JSC)和覃志豪单窗算法(QMW)更适用于喀斯特城市地表温度反演,反演值和实测值的误差在1.0℃内。反演地表温度的统计值以JSC算法与QMW算法相近,平均值的差值为0.26℃,标准差的差值为0.01℃,建筑和裸岩温度平均值的差值分别为0.43℃和0.54℃,高于水体和茂密植被;Jimenez劈窗算法与Rozenstein劈窗算法相近,平均值的差值为1.14℃,标准差的差值为0.19℃;Weng单通道算法在劈窗算法与JSC和QMW算法之间。各算法对比辐射率ε较敏感,ε每增加0.01,地表温度反演值误差增加0.4～0.7℃;除QMW算法反演值随近地面气温每增加1.0℃而引入近0.5℃误差外,各算法对近地面气温、大气总水分含量、大气透射率的敏感性相对较低。研究结果可为喀斯特城市热环境监测提供科学依据。     

MODIS数据地表温度反演劈窗算法比较

针对MODIS数据,分析比较了QIN和Wan-Dozier两种劈窗算法地表温度(LST)反演精度和误差分布。首先利用辐射传输模型MODTRAN4.0,结合TIGR大气廓线数据,评价两种算法绝对精度,然后基于误差传递理论分析评价二者的总精度,最后对两种算法的LST反演结果进行比较。研究表明针对所有廓线数据,两种算法绝对精度相差不大,但Wan-Dozier算法绝对精度受地表温度和水汽含量变化的影响程度要大于QIN算法;两种算法总精度相差不大,且主要误差源均为算法绝对精度和地表比辐射率精度,QIN算法反演结果对地表比辐射率的敏感性要略高于Wan-Dozier算法;两种算法得到研究区LST分布情况基本一致,均可表现空间LST分布差异,其中水体和裸土的LST反演结果差异较大,城镇和植被平均温度差异在0.5 K以内。     

基于MODIS 影像数据的劈窗算法研究及其参数确定

劈窗算法是目前由热红外遥感数据获取陆面温度的主要方法。在介绍劈窗算法的一般表现形式的基础上, 我们推导出适合于MOD IS 影像数据的劈窗算法。大气透过率和地表比辐射率是求解地表温度的两个关键参数。由于MOD IS 图像分辨率较低,MOD IS 像元主要由水面、植被和裸土3种地物类型构成, 故可依据这3 种地物的构成比例确定地表比辐射率。从遥感影像上反演大气的水汽含量, 再根据大气水汽含量与大气透过率的关系计算出大气透过率。最后将文中推导的劈窗算法用于江苏省地表温度的反演。反演出来的地表温度图显示出明显的地表温度空间差异、城市热岛效应和不同的地物类型。     

Reconstruction of MODIS land-surface temperature in a flat terrain and fragmented landscape

Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land-surface temperature (LST) products provide important and reliable time-series data for the examination of global climate change, water cycling, and ecological evolution. In particular, in recently developed remote-sensing evapotranspiration models, such as the Surface Energy Balance Algorithm for Land and the Surface Energy Balance System, LST is a critical parameter that can directly influence the accuracy and integrity of final results. However, clouds and other atmospheric disturbances, which cover a large area throughout most of the year, are read as blank values by these programs, creating a problem. To solve this, a number of algorithms have been proposed to reconstruct LST data, but few can be used to evaluate flat and relatively fragmented landscape regions, such as the Yellow River Delta in China. Here, we conducted an analysis where we considered the LST of a flat area to be mainly influenced by land cover and other environmental elements (e.g. soil moisture). We used maps such as land cover, normalized difference vegetation index, and MODIS band 7 as additional data in the reconstruction model. All of the LST pixels we used were randomly divided into two parts: one part was used to train the model, and the other part was used to validate the calculated results. Three different methods have been developed to reconstruct LST data – linear regression, regression tree (RT) analysis, and artificial neural networks. In comparing these methods, we found that the RT method is able to estimate the LST of MODIS pixels with the greatest accuracy, and that it is both convenient and useful for reconstructing the LST map in flat and fragmented regions.     

Algorithms Comparison of Land Surface Temperature Retrieval from Landsat Series Data：A Case Study in Qiqihar，China

Land Surface Temperature（LST)is considered to be one of the significant indicators of urban environment analysis.Landsat thermal infrared series data is an important data source for retrieving surface temperature.In this paper，the thermal infrared band of the Landsat data in 2002，2008 and 2016 were used to retrieve LST by three different algorithms in municipal area of Qiqihar，China.These algorithms were the Mono-Window algorithm（MW algorithm)，the Single Channel algorithm（SC algorithm) and the Radiation Transport Equation method（RTE algorithm).And the results of the retrieval were compared to each other and verified by MODIS surface temperature products.The LST distribution maps were accomplished according to the retrieval results.The results showed that：(1)The spatial distribution of the LST obtained by the retrieval of the Landsat series by the three algorithms is consistent，and the LSTof the urban center is higher and thetemperature of water is the lowest；(2)Based on ETM+ data，the consistency between SC and RTE algorithm results is good，among which the SC algorithm has the highest precision，and the MW algorithm has large errors in different land cover areas；(3)The retrieval results by MW algorithm based on the TM data has the highest accuracy，RTE algorithm results is second，and the LST form SC algorithm is less consistent with the corresponding MODIS temperature products；(4)Based on the Landsat 8 TIRS data，the SC algorithm has the highest accuracy and the RTE algorithm has a large error.     

Quality assessment and validation of the MODIS global land surface temperature

This paper presents an evaluation of the Earth Observing System (EOS) Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) thermal infrared bands and the status of land surface temperature (LST) version-3 standard products retrieved from Terra MODIS data. The accuracy of daily MODIS LST products has been validated in more than 20 clear-sky cases with in situ measurement data collected in field campaigns in 2000–2002. The MODIS LST accuracy is better than 1°C in the range from ?10 to 50°C. Refinements and improvements were made to the new version of MODIS LST product generation executive code. Using both Terra and Aqua MODIS data for LST retrieval improves the quality of the LST product and the diurnal feature in the product due to better temporal, spatial and angular coverage of clear-sky observations.     

Land Surface Temperature Data Fusion of Landsat ETM and MODISby Combining TsHARP and STITFM Model

Land Surface Temperature (LST) is an important parameter that describes energy balance of substance and energy exchange between the surface and the atmosphere,and LST has widely used in the fields of urban heat island effect,soil moisture and surface radiative flux.Currently,no satellite sensor can deliver thermal infrared data at both high temporal resolution and spatial resolution,which strongly limits the wide application of thermal infrared data.Based on the MODIS land surface temperature product and Landsat ETM+image,a temporal and spatial fusion method is proposed by combining the TsHARP (Thermal sHARPening) model with the STITFM (Spatio\|Temporal Integrated Temperature Fusion Model) algorithm,defined as CTsSTITFM model in this study.The TsHARP method is used to downscale the 1 km MODIS land surface temperature image to LST data at spatial resolution of 250 m.Then the accuracy is verified by the retrieval LST from Landsat ETM+ image at the same time.Land surface temperature image at 30 m spatial scale is predicted by fusing Landsat ETM+ and downscaling MODIS data using STITFM model.The fusion LST image is validated by the estimated LST from Landsat ETM+ data for the same predicted.The results show that the proposed method has a better precision comparing to the STITFM algorithm.Under the default parameter setting,the predicted LST values using CTsSTITFM fusion method have a root mean square error (RMSE) less than 1.33 K.By adjusting the window size of CTsSTITFM fusion method,the fusion results in the selected areas show some regularity with the increasing of the window.In general,a reasonable window size set may slightly improve the effects of LST fusion.The CTsSTITFM fusion method can solve the problem of mixed pixels caused by coarse\|scale MODIS surface temperature images to some degree.     

基于HJ-1B卫星数据的南京市地表温度反演研究

地表温度(LST)是全球变化的过程参数,应用HJ-1B-RS热红外数据,采用辐射传输法(RTE)、覃志豪单窗算法(Qins’)和普适性单通道算法(JM&S)对南京市地表温度进行反演。结果表明:3种算法均能较好地反映南京地区的地表温度趋势。RTE反演精度最高,与MODIS地温产品的差值多集中在2.1 K左右;Qins’的反演结果略低,温差多集中在3.87 K左右;而JM&S的结果明显偏低,温差多集中在5.96 K左右。结合土地利用类型图对地表温度进行分析,RTE温度结果中,温度最高的建设用地与温度最低的水体的温度相差4.1 K;Qins’温度结果中建设用地与水体的温度相差4.38 K;JM&S温度结果中建设用地与水体的温度相差2.15 K。RTE和Qins’更能体现不同土地利用类型之间的温度差异及对城市热岛的贡献。     

FY3A/MERSI地表温度反演

MERSI是我国第二代极轨气象卫星上的重要传感器,可获取高空间分辨率和高时间分辨率的对地观测影像。为使Jimènez-Mu珘nozSobrino算法更适用于FY3A/MERSI传感器通道特性,更新了大气函数的估算系数,并引入观测角度因子,以获取更为精确像元间更为平滑的地表温度。用MODTRAN4模拟验证该算法精度,得引入角度因子后反演精度显著提升,所有角度下平均误差为-0.6±2.2K。用实测的敦煌戈壁地表温度和MODIS地表温度产品评价MERSI反演结果,显示MERSI地表温度的空间分布准确,结果精度也较高。与实测温度对比,平均误差为1.74K,均方根误差小于1.9K。研究区域与MODIS地表温度间差异平均为2.6307K。虽然会受云检测精度和观测亮温偏高的影响,由MERSI反演的高精度地表温度在相关科研和业务方面仍然具有极好的应用前景。     

Generation of Landsat surface temperature product for China, 2000–2010

Land surface temperature (LST) is a key parameter in the physics of land surface processes on regional and global scales. Although there are MODIS and Landsat land surface reflectance products, there is no LST product for Landsat data due in part to many challenges in the development of an operational Landsat LST product generating system because Landsat possesses only one thermal infrared channel. The aim of this article is to describe the Landsat LST product generation project launched by the Centre for Earth Observation and Digital Earth (CEODE), Chinese Academy of Sciences. The generalized single-channel (SC) algorithm proposed by Jiménez-Muñoz et al. is used for LST retrieval. It is fully operational, requires minimal input data requirements, and has acceptable precision. Total atmospheric water vapour content is the key input parameter required by the SC algorithm. In this project, the MODIS water vapour product is employed to derive total atmospheric water vapour content. In this way, an operational Landsat LST product generation program was constructed by integration of MODIS and Landsat satellite imagery.