Lexicographically-ordered constraint satisfaction problems

We describe a simple CSP formalism for handling multi-attribute preference problems with hard constraints, one that combines hard constraints and preferences so the two are easily distinguished conceptually and for purposes of problem solving. Preferences are represented as a lexicographic order over complete assignments based on variable importance and rankings of values in each domain. Feasibility constraints are treated in the usual manner. Since the preference representation is ordinal in character, these problems can be solved with algorithms that do not require evaluations to be represented explicitly. This includes ordinary CSP algorithms, although these cannot stop searching until all solutions have been checked, with the important exception of heuristics that follow the preference order (lexical variable and value ordering). We describe relations between lexicographic CSPs and more general soft constraint formalisms and show how a full lexicographic ordering can be expressed in the latter. We discuss relations with (T)CP-nets, highlighting the advantages of the present formulation, and we discuss the use of lexicographic ordering in multiobjective optimisation. We also consider strengths and limitations of this form of representation with respect to expressiveness and usability. We then show how the simple structure of lexicographic CSPs can support specialised algorithms: a branch and bound algorithm with an implicit cost function, and an iterative algorithm that obtains optimal values for successive variables in the importance ordering, both of which can be combined with appropriate variable ordering heuristics to improve performance. We show experimentally that with these procedures a variety of problems can be solved efficiently, including some for which the basic lexically ordered search is infeasible in practice.     

Solving quantified constraint satisfaction problems

We make a number of contributions to the study of the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem (QCSP). The QCSP is an extension of the constraint satisfaction problem that can be used to model combinatorial problems containing contingency or uncertainty. It allows for universally quantified variables that can model uncertain actions and events, such as the unknown weather for a future party, or an opponent's next move in a game. In this paper we report significant contributions to two very different methods for solving QCSPs. The first approach is to implement special purpose algorithms for QCSPs; and the second is to encode QCSPs as Quantified Boolean Formulas and then use specialized QBF solvers. The discovery of particularly effective encodings influenced the design of more effective algorithms: by analyzing the properties of these encodings, we identify the features in QBF solvers responsible for their efficiency. This enables us to devise analogues of these features in QCSPs, and implement them in special purpose algorithms, yielding an effective special purpose solver, QCSP-Solve. Experiments show that this solver and a highly optimized QBF encoding are several orders of magnitude more efficient than the initially developed algorithms. A final, but significant, contribution is the identification of flaws in simple methods of generating random QCSP instances, and a means of generating instances which are not known to be flawed.     

Solving set-valued constraint satisfaction problems

In this paper, we consider the resolution of constraint satisfaction problems in the case where the variables of the problem are subsets of ${\mathbb{R}^{n}}$ . In order to use a constraint propagation approach, we introduce set intervals (named i-sets), which are sets of subsets of ${\mathbb{R}^{n}}$ with a lower bound and an upper bound with respect to the inclusion. Then, we propose basic operations for i-sets. This makes possible to build contractors that are then used by the propagation to solve problem involving sets as unknown variables. In order to illustrate the principle and the efficiency of the approach, a testcase is provided.     

Relaxations of semiring constraint satisfaction problems

The Semiring Constraint Satisfaction Problem (SCSP) framework is a popular approach for the representation of partial constraint satisfaction problems. In this framework preferences can be associated with tuples of values of the variable domains. Bistarelli et al. [S. Bistarelli, U. Montanari, F. Rossi, Semiring-based constraint solving and optimization, Journal of the ACM 44 (2) (1997) 201-236] defines a maximal solution to a SCSP as the best set of solution tuples for the variables in the problem. Sometimes this maximal solution may not be good enough, and in this case we want to change the constraints so that we solve a problem that is slightly different from the original problem but has an acceptable solution. We propose a relaxation of a SCSP, and use a semiring to give a measure of the difference between the original SCSP and the relaxed SCSP. We introduce a relaxation scheme but do not address the computational aspects.     

Backjump-based backtracking for constraint satisfaction problems

The performance of backtracking algorithms for solving finite-domain constraint satisfaction problems can be improved substantially by look-back and look-ahead methods. Look-back techniques extract information by analyzing failing search paths that are terminated by dead-ends. Look-ahead techniques use constraint propagation algorithms to avoid such dead-ends altogether. This paper describes a number of look-back variants including backjumping and constraint recording which recognize and avoid some unnecessary explorations of the search space. The last portion of the paper gives an overview of look-ahead methods such as forward checking and dynamic variable ordering, and discusses their combination with backjumping.     

Dynamic constraint satisfaction problems over models

In early phases of designing complex systems, models are not sufficiently detailed to serve as an input for automated synthesis tools. Instead, a design space is constituted by multiple models representing different valid design candidates. Design space exploration aims at searching through these candidates defined in the design space to find solutions that satisfy the structural and numeric design constraints and provide a balanced choice with respect to various quality metrics. Design space exploration in an model-driven engineering (MDE) context is frequently tackled as specific sort of constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). In CSP, declarative constraints capture restrictions over variables with finite domains where both the number of variables and their domains are required to be a priori finite. However, the existing formulation of constraint satisfaction problems can be too restrictive to capture design space exploration in many MDE applications with complex structural constraints expressed over the underlying models. In this paper, we interpret flexible and dynamic constraint satisfaction problems directly in the context of models. These extensions allow the relaxation of constraints during a solving process and address problems that are subject to change and require incremental re-evaluation. Furthermore, we present our prototype constraint solver for the domain of graph models built upon the Viatra2 model transformation framework and provide an evaluation of its performance with comparison to related tools.     

Ants can solve constraint satisfaction problems

We describe a novel incomplete approach for solving constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) based on the ant colony optimization (ACO) metaheuristic. The idea is to use artificial ants to keep track of promising areas of the search space by laying trails of pheromone. This pheromone information is used to guide the search, as a heuristic for choosing values to be assigned to variables. We first describe the basic ACO algorithm for solving CSPs and we show how it can be improved by combining it with local search techniques. Then, we introduce a preprocessing step, the goal of which is to favor a larger exploration of the search space at a lower cost, and we show that it allows ants to find better solutions faster. Finally, we evaluate our approach on random binary problems     

Solving constraint satisfaction problems using hybrid evolutionarysearch

We combine the concept of evolutionary search with the systematic search concepts of arc revision and hill climbing to form a hybrid system that quickly finds solutions to static and dynamic constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). Furthermore, we present the results of two experiments. In the first experiment, we show that our evolutionary hybrid outperforms a well-known hill climber, the iterative descent method (IDM), on a test suite of 750 randomly generated static CSPs. These results show the existence of a “mushy region” which contains a phase transition between CSPs that are based on constraint networks that have one or more solutions and those based on networks that have no solution. In the second experiment, we use a test suite of 250 additional randomly generated CSPs to compare two approaches for solving CSPs. In the first method, all the constraints of a CSP are known by the hybrid at run-time. We refer to this method as the static method for solving CSPs. In the second method, only half of the constraints of a CSPs are known at run-time. Each time that our hybrid system discovers a solution that satisfies all of the constraints of the current network, one additional constraint is added. This process of incrementally adding constraints is continued until all the constraints of a CSP are known by the algorithm or until the maximum number of individuals has been created. We refer to this second method as the dynamic method for solving CSPs. Our results show hybrid evolutionary search performs exceptionally well in the presence of dynamic (incremental) constraints, then also illuminate a potential hazard with solving dynamic CSPs     

A knowledge representation for constraint satisfaction problems

We present a general representation for problems that can be reduced to constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) and a model for reasoning about their solution. The novel part of the model is a constraint-driven reasoner that manages a set of constraints specified in terms of arbitrarily complex Boolean expressions and represented in the form of a dependency network. This dependency network incorporates control information (derived from the syntax of the constraints) that is used for constraint propagation, contains dependency information that can be used for explanation and for dependency-directed backtracking, and is incremental in the sense that if the problem specification is modified, a new solution can be derived by modifying the existing solution. The constraint-driven reasoner is coupled to a problem solver which contains information about the problem variables and preference orderings     

Nogood-FC for solving partitionable constraint satisfaction problems

Many real problems can be naturally modelled as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs). However, some of these problems are of a distributed nature, which requires problems of this kind to be modelled as distributed constraint satisfaction problems (DCSPs). In this work, we present a distributed model for solving CSPs. Our technique carries out a partition over the constraint network using a graph partitioning software; after partitioning, each sub-CSP is arranged into a DFS-tree CSP structure that is used as a hierarchy of communication by our distributed algorithm. We show that our distributed algorithm outperforms well-known centralized algorithms solving partitionable CSPs.     

Low-level dichotomy for quantified constraint satisfaction problems

Building on a result of Larose and Tesson for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), we uncover a dichotomy for the quantified constraint satisfaction problem QCSP(B), where B is a finite structure that is a core. Specifically, such problems are either in ALogtime or are L-hard. This involves demonstrating that if CSP(B) is first-order expressible, and B is a core, then QCSP(B) is in ALogtime.We show that the class of B such that CSP(B) is first-order expressible (indeed trivial) is a microcosm for all QCSPs. Specifically, for any B there exists a C — generally not a core — such that CSP(C) is trivial, yet QCSP(B) and QCSP(C) are equivalent under logspace reductions.     

Visual analogy: Viewing analogical retrieval and mapping as constraint satisfaction problems

The core issue of analogical reasoning is the transfer of relational knowledge from a source case to a target problem. Visual analogical reasoning pertains to problems containing only visual knowledge. Holyoak and Thagard proposed that the retrieval and mapping tasks of analogy in general can be productively viewed as constraint satisfaction problems, and provided connectionist implementations of their proposal. In this paper, we reexamine the retrieval and mapping tasks of analogy in the context of diagrammatic cases, representing the spatial structure of source and target diagrams as semantic networks in which the nodes represent spatial elements and the links represent spatial relations. We use a method of constraint satisfaction with backtracking for the retrieval and mapping tasks, with subgraph isomorphism over a particular domain language as the similarity measure. Results in the domain of 2D line drawings suggest that at least for this domain the above method is quite promising.     

Comparing evolutionary algorithms on binary constraint satisfaction problems

Constraint handling is not straightforward in evolutionary algorithms (EAs) since the usual search operators, mutation and recombination, are 'blind' to constraints. Nevertheless, the issue is highly relevant, for many challenging problems involve constraints. Over the last decade, numerous EAs for solving constraint satisfaction problems (CSP) have been introduced and studied on various problems. The diversity of approaches and the variety of problems used to study the resulting algorithms prevents a fair and accurate comparison of these algorithms. This paper aligns related work by presenting a concise overview and an extensive performance comparison of all these EAs on a systematically generated test suite of random binary CSPs. The random problem instance generator is based on a theoretical model that fixes deficiencies of models and respective generators that have been formerly used in the evolutionary computing field.     

Solving constraint satisfaction problems with SAT modulo theories

Due to significant advances in SAT technology in the last years, its use for solving constraint satisfaction problems has been gaining wide acceptance. Solvers for satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) generalize SAT solving by adding the ability to handle arithmetic and other theories. Although there are results pointing out the adequacy of SMT solvers for solving CSPs, there are no available tools to extensively explore such adequacy. For this reason, in this paper we introduce a tool for translating FLATZINC (MINIZINC intermediate code) instances of CSPs to the standard SMT-LIB language. We provide extensive performance comparisons between state-of-the-art SMT solvers and most of the available FLATZINC solvers on standard FLATZINC problems. The obtained results suggest that state-of-the-art SMT solvers can be effectively used to solve CSPs.     

Increasing tree search efficiency for constraint satisfaction problems

In this paper we explore the number of tree search operations required to solve binary constraint satisfaction problems. We show analytically and experimentally that the two principles of first trying the places most likely to fail and remembering what has been done to avoid repeating the same mistake twice improve the standard backtracking search. We experimentally show that a lookahead procedure called forward checking (to anticipate the future) which employs the most likely to fail principle performs better than standard backtracking, Ullman's, Waltz's, Mackworth's, and Haralick's discrete relaxation in all cases tested, and better than Gaschnig's backmarking in the larger problems.     

Dynamic structural symmetry breaking for constraint satisfaction problems

In recent years, symmetry breaking for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) has attracted considerable attention. Various general schemes have been proposed to eliminate symmetries. In general, these schemes may take exponential space or time to eliminate all the symmetries. We identify several classes of CSPs that encompass many practical problems and for which symmetry breaking for various forms of value or variable interchangeability is tractable using dedicated search procedures. We also show the limits of efficient symmetry breaking for such dominance-detection schemes by proving intractability results for some classes of CSPs.