Introduction to instrument development: scaling methods

Endoscopic removal of biliary calculi is a safe and effective alternative to surgical exploration of the common bile duct. However, as stones increase in diameter, endoscopic retrieval becomes more difficult and hazardous. Mechanical lithotripsy is an endoscopic technique used to crush common bile duct stones that are too large to be removed by conventional methods. In the 3 years following the introduction of this technique at our institution, 145 patients underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy improved the overall success rate of common bile duct clearance from 86.2% to 94.5%. No morbidity or mortality was associated with the procedure. Therefore, we recommend mechanical lithotripsy when bile duct stones cannot be removed with conventional techniques.     

Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a prospective study

The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the feasibility, success rate, safety, and short-term results of single-stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and ductal stones in 100 consecutive, unselected patients. Common bile duct (CBD) stones were diagnoses at routine intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy in 100 of 950 patients with gallstones undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Unsuspected CBD stones were present in 39 patients (4.1% of 950; 39% of 100); 26 patients were referred for surgery after failed endoscopic sphinctertomy (ES) performed elsewhere. Transcystic duct CBD exploration (TC-CBDE) was the procedure of choice. When it was not feasible, choledochotomy and direct CBD exploration (D-CBDE) was performed. Use of biliary drainage was liberal. A completion cholangiogram was obtained for all patients. Laparoscopic treatment of CBD stones was successful in 96 patients: after TC-CBDE in 63 and after D-CBDE in 33. Four operations were converted to open surgery (4%). Retained stones, observed in five patients, were treated by ES in two cases and by percutaneous endoscopic/fluoroscopic lithotripsy in three. Minor morbidity included biloma (n = 2), port site infection (n = 2), and subumbilical hematoma (n = 1). Major morbidity was bile leakage from the cystic duct stump in two cases due to clips or transcystic duct drainage displacement, respectively. One elderly, high risk patient died after being referred for several failed attempts of endoscopic clearance; she died from cardiogenic shock 3 days after successful laparoscopic treatment. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is feasible and safe in most patients, with short-term results that compare favorably with the results of sequential ES/LC reported in the literature.     

Laser lithotripsy of difficult bile duct stones: results in 60 patients using a rhodamine 6G dye laser with optical stone tissue detection system

INTRODUCTION: Laser lithotripsy of bile duct stones has become a widely accepted endoscopic treatment modality for giant, impacted, or very hard stones. The procedure is usually carried out under direct endoscopic control in view of the potential risk of bile duct injuries in "blind" laser application. AIMS: To investigate the use of a rhodamine 6G laser lithotriptor with an integrated optical stone tissue detection system (oSTDS). METHODS: From 1 September 1991 to 7 March 1997, 60 patients with giant or impacted common bile duct stones refractory to endoscopic papillotomy stone extraction, and mechanical lithotripsy were treated via the endoscopic retrograde route using a rhodamine 6G dye laser (595 nm, 2.5 micros, 80-150 mJ pp, Lithognost Telemit/Baasel Corp., Germany) with integrated oSTDS. In case of tissue contact oSTDS cuts off the laser pulse after 190 ns (transmission of 5-8% of the total pulse energy). 47 patients (78.3%) were subjected to x ray targeting (oSTDS) alone, five (8.3%) to choledochoscope targeting alone, and eight (13.3%) to both techniques. RESULTS: At the end of treatment 52 (87%) patients were completely stone-free. The only major complications included transient haemobilia, cholangitis, and pancreatitis in five patients. All five were successfully treated by conservative methods. CONCLUSIONS: Laser lithotripsy using the described rhodamine 6G dye laser with oSTDS seems to be safe and effective and allows "blind" fragmentation of difficult common bile duct stones under radiological control only.     

Dormia baskets impacted in the bile duct: release by extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic extraction of bile duct stones may be complicated by impaction of the Dormia basket with captured stones, or rupture of the traction wire of the basket during mechanical lithotripsy. In an attempt to release impacted baskets by nonoperative means, we studied the efficacy of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in this dangerous clinical situation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen extracorporeal shock-wave treatments were performed in 12 consecutive patients (eight women and four men; mean age 73.2 +/- 13.2 years, range 46-86 years) with an electrohydraulic shock-wave lithotriptor, using fluoroscopy (n = 13) or ultrasound (n = 1) for targeting. A total of 1845 +/- 334 (mean +/- SD) shock-wave discharges at a voltage of 22 +/- 4 kV were delivered per treatment. Nine treatment sessions (64%) were performed while patients were under general anesthesia. An attempt to extract the Dormia basket was made after disintegration of the captured stone had been confirmed by fluoroscopy. RESULTS: It was possible to remove the Dormia basket by nonsurgical means in 11 of the 12 patients (92%) after one treatment session, and after three treatment sessions in the remaining patient. Thus, disintegration of the stones allowed extraction of the Dormia basket in all patients. None of the patients needed surgical intervention. All patients were rendered free of bile duct stones after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and subsequent endoscopic removal of the fragments. No adverse effects of shock-wave therapy with subsequent extraction of the Dormia baskets were observed. CONCLUSION: Shock-wave therapy represents a primary nonsurgical therapeutic option in patients with either impacted Dormia baskets or broken devices which cannot be extracted by endoscopic means.     

Current results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for lithiasis of the common bile duct

Between January 1989 and June 1990, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 308 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones (mean age: 74 years). Complete clearance of common bile duct was achieved at the first attempt in 65% of cases. This rate was significantly related to the size and the number of biliary stones. The success rate reached 97 percent after repeated endoscopic sessions (127 patients), mechanical lithotripsy (20 patients), extracorporeal or intracorporeal lithotripsy (18 and 11 patients, respectively). During the month following the endoscopic sphincterotomy, 39 patients (13%) developed one or more complications and 11 patients (3.7%) died. The complication rate was related to the time elapsed between biliary opacification and endoscopic sphincterotomy (P = 0.04) and between endoscopic sphincterotomy and total common bile duct clearance (P = 0.0007). No patient younger than 75 years died, but death occurred in 4.5% of the patients older than 75 years. Thirty patients (10%) developed endoscopic sphincterotomy-related complications. Cholangitis and bleeding were the most frequent complications (4 and 2%, respectively). Cholangitis occurred more frequently among the patients older than 75 (P < 0.05) or when transhepatic guided endoscopic sphincterotomy or intracorporeal lithotripsy was used (P < 0.005). Cholangitis led to death in 2 patients, 86 and 87 years old (0.7%). Endoscopic sphincterotomy related complications developed within 48 hours in all but 4 patients (2 patients with pancreatitis and 2 patients with cholecystitis).     

K+ Channel density increases selectively in the endfoot of retinal glial cells during development of Rana catesbiana

BACKGROUND: We investigated the bile duct wall thickness measured on intraductal US in patients who had not undergone biliary drainage, with special attention to the influence of cancer at the distal bile duct, bile duct stones, obstructive jaundice, longitudinal cancer extension, and primary sclerosing cholangitis on wall thickness. METHODS: The study included 183 patients. Patients who had undergone previous biliary drainage were excluded. Intraductal US was performed by the transpapillary route with use of a thin-caliber ultrasonic probe (2.0 mm diameter, 20 MHz frequency). The bile duct wall thickness (width of the inside hypoechoic layer) was retrospectively measured on US images. RESULTS: Bile duct wall thicknesses of the common hepatic duct for the control group (n = 95), cancer at the distal bile duct group (n = 9), bile duct stone group (n = 56), and obstructive jaundice group (n = 17) were 0.6 +/- 0.3 mm (mean +/- SD), 0.8 +/- 0.5 mm, 0.8 +/- 0.6 mm, and 0.8 +/- 0. 5 mm, respectively. No significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between them. However, wall thickness for the cancer extension to the common hepatic duct group (n = 4, 2.0 +/- 0.4 mm) and sclerosing cholangitis group (n = 2, 2.5 +/- 0.4 mm) were significantly greater than in the other groups (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have not undergone previous biliary drainage, the bile duct wall thickness was not thicker in patients with obstructive jaundice. However, the duct wall was significantly thicker in patients with either longitudinal cancer extension or primary sclerosing cholangitis compared with that of other groups.     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and lithiasis of the common bile duct: prospective study on the importance of preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the standard treatment of symptomatic gallstones. At present, no consensus has been reached on the diagnostic and therapeutic methods of concomitant common bile duct stones. Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary, by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy during the same anesthetic procedure could be a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent a prospective endoscopic ultrasonographic evaluation prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. Fourty-four patients (35%) had at least one predictive factor for common bile duct stones. Endoscopic ultrasonography and cholecystectomy were performed on the same day. Endoscopic ultrasonography was followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy by the same endoscopist in case of common bile duct stones on endoscopic ultrasonography. Patients were routinely followed up between 3 and 6 months and one year after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Endoscopic ultrasonography suggested common bile duct stones in 21 patients (17%). Endoscopic ultrasonography identified a stone in 17 of 44 patients (38.6%) with predictor of common bile duct stones and only in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) without predictor of common bile duct stone. Among these 21 patients, one patient was not investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because of the high risk of sphincterotomy, 19 patients had a stone removed after sphincterotomy, one patient had no visible stone neither on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, nor on exploration of the common bile duct after sphincterotomy. Endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in 104 patients (83%). However, two patients in this group were investigated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography because endoscopic ultrasonography was incomplete in one case and because endoscopic ultrasonography was normal in the second case but a stone in the left hepatic duct was detected by ultrasonography. A stone was removed after endoscopic sphincterotomy in these two patients. In the group of 102 patients without stone, 91 out of 92, continued to be asymptomatic during a median follow-up of 8.5 months. One patient with symptoms one month after cholecystectomy underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy but no stone was found. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography followed, if necessary with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and sphincterotomy is a diagnostic and therapeutic alternative for common bile duct stones making possible a laparoscopic cholecystectomy without intraoperative investigation of the common bile duct for all patients. This alternative is only justifiable in patients with predictor of common bile duct stones.     

Detection of choledocholithiasis: comparison of unenhanced helical CT and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

PURPOSE: To compare unenhanced helical computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the detection of common bile duct calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within 13 months, 51 patients (aged 18-94 years) with clinically suspected choledocholithiasis underwent unenhanced helical CT immediately before undergoing ERCP. CT scans were evaluated for the presence of bile duct stones, ampullary stones, the gallbladder and gallbladder stones, intrahepatic biliary dilatation, and the size of the bile duct at the porta hepatis and in the pancreatic head. ERCP images were evaluated for the presence of bile duct or ampullary stones, as well as for biliary dilatation. RESULTS: Unenhanced helical CT depicted common bile duct stones in 15 of 17 patients found to have stones at ERCP. Three patients had stones impacted at the ampulla, all of which were detected with CT. In addition, there was one false-positive finding at CT. CT had a sensitivity of 88%, a specificity of 97%, and an accuracy of 94% in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. CONCLUSION: Unenhanced helical CT is useful for evaluating suspected choledocholithiasis.     

Percutaneous transhepatic lithotripsy using a choledochoscope: long-term follow-up in 14 patients

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to estimate the long-term prognosis of patients with bile duct stones who undergo electrohydraulic lithotripsy guided by choledochoscopy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Since 1987, at our institution, 14 patients with bile duct stones have been treated using percutaneous electrohydraulic lithotripsy guided by choledochoscopy. The procedure was performed 5-7 days after biliary drainage using a 5-mm choledochoscope placed through an 18- to 20-French sheath. All patients underwent follow-up CT, sonography, or both every 6-12 months after treatment. RESULTS: No complications occurred in the 14 patients who underwent treatment. During a mean follow-up period of 4.8 years (range, 2-9 years), two (14%) of the 14 patients developed recurrent common bile duct stones, and another two (14%) developed recurrent small intrahepatic stones; all patients remained asymptomatic. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous electrohydraulic lithotripsy can be safely performed using a 5-mm choledochoscope. Recurrent calculi may be seen in 28% of patients.     

Differences between responses of naive and activated T cells to anergy induction

OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and efficacy of the Alexandrite laser for intracorporeal lithotripsy of renal and ureteral stones in conjunction with ureterorenoscopy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 137 patients with 169 calculi in 143 renoureteral units who were treated with the Alexandrite laser via a retrograde (91.5%) or antegrade (8.5%) endoscopic approach. RESULTS: Adequate intraoperative fragmentation of the stone was observed in 88.8% of the cases. No intraoperative complications were attributable to the laser. At a mean follow-up of 34 days, the overall stone-free rate was 74.4%. The stone-free rate for ureteral stones (n = 115) was 80%, whereas the stone-free rate for renal stones (n = 22) was only 44%. In the best subgroup of ureteral stones (10 mm or less in the distal ureter), the stone-free rate was 97.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The Alexandrite laser is a safe modality for intracorporeal lithotripsy and is highly effective for ureteral stones less than 10 mm in size.     

Endoscopic mechanical lithotripsy of difficult common bile duct stones

BACKGROUND: Mechanical lithotripsy for the management of difficult common bile duct stones has sometimes yielded conflicting results. METHODS: A series of 162 consecutive patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy was evaluated retrospectively and a large number of variables tested for their association with successful outcome. RESULTS: The procedure was safe (morbidity rate 1.8 per cent) and effective (84.0 per cent stone clearance rate). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that stone size was the only outcome predictor (mean(s.d.) diameter of grasped versus non-grasped stones 21.7 (6.7) versus 28.3(10.4) mm; F = 10.72, 98 d.f., P = 0.002). The cumulative probability of bile duct clearance ranged from over 90 per cent for stones with a diameter less than 10 mm to 68 per cent for those greater than 28 mm in diameter (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Patients at high risk of lithotripsy failure (stone diameter of 28 mm or more) might more wisely undergo surgery or other non-surgical procedures, such as extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or long-term biliary stenting.     

Retained common bile duct stones after endoscopic sphincterotomy: temporary and longterm treatment with biliary stenting

Basket extraction after endoscopic sphincterotomy failed to clear the bile ducts immediately in 85 (30%) of 283 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones. Temporary biliary drainage was established by the insertion of a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent before further planned endoscopic attempts at stone removal. In 84 patients (21 male: 63 female, mean age 77 years) this measure relieved biliary obstruction, mean serum bilirubin falling from 101 to 18 umol/l by the time of the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Six patients died from non-biliary causes with temporary stents in situ. Common bile duct stone extraction was achieved endoscopically in 50 of the remaining 79 patients after a mean of 4.3 months (range 1-12), 34 (68%) requiring only one further procedure. Three patients were referred for biliary surgery. Single stents were also effective for longterm biliary drainage in the remaining 26 elderly patients with unextractable stones. The main biliary complication of stenting was 13 episodes of cholangitis but all except one responded to medical treatment and early stent exchange. If common bile duct stones remain after endoscopic sphincterotomy, a single 7 Fr double pigtail stent is effective and safe for temporary biliary drainage before further endoscopic attempts at duct clearance and for longterm biliary drainage especially in the old and frail.     

Echographic characteristics of retinal arterial macroaneurysm

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Caroli's disease causes relapsing episodes of cholangitis due to the presence of intrahepatic lithiasis. Strategies for cholangitis prevention are still widely debated. Ursodeoxycholic acid, hepaticojejunostomy, partial hepatectomy, or transplantation, have all been proposed as therapeutic options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of therapeutic endoscopy, and especially endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES), in the management of Caroli's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1983 and 1995, six patients with Caroli's disease (mean age 52, range 17-75) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for acute cholangitis. Sphincterotomy was performed if common bile duct stones were present. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy, (ESWL) or intraductal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (IEL) were performed if necessary. RESULTS: The mean number of endoscopic sessions per patient was four (range three to seven). Sphincterotomy was performed in five patients and cholangioscopy in three. ESWL was performed twice in each of four patients. A Strecker expandable metal stent was placed in one patient to maintain sphincterotomy patency. In one patient, two sessions of IEL and pulsed laser were carried out. Complete clearance of intrahepatic stones was achieved in four of the six subjects (66.6%) and partial clearance in two patients. No morbidity or mortality was observed. During the follow-up (mean 6.2 years; range: 2.1-16.3), only two patients had acute cholangitis at nine months and three years, respectively, after the endoscopic treatment. Both had residual intrahepatic stones left after the initial endoscopic attempt at clearance. CONCLUSION: ERCP is a necessary diagnostic procedure which should always be carried out in patients with Caroli's disease. Our experience shows that ES does not result in an increased incidence of cholangitis and that therapeutic endoscopy allows complete clearance of intrahepatic stones in the majority of patients with unresectable symptomatic Caroli's disease. Nevertheless, the oncological risk in these patients remains unchanged, and they still have an increased risk of cholangiocarcinoma.     

Ca(2+)-permeable, outwardly-rectifying K+ channels in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana

Advances in cannulation techniques and instruments have helped in difficult bile duct cannulation and thus stone extraction. For small common bile duct (CBD) stones, endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation has been proposed as an alternative to endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). The technique must undergo further evaluation before recommending its routine use. For most patients with bile duct stones, EPT remains the method of choice. Out of 8204 patients treated in three surgical endoscopy centers (Chile, Germany, and India), 86% to 91% of all CBD stones could be extracted subsequently after EPT using a Dormia basket; 4% to 7% required mechanical lithotripsy (ML) before removal and 3% to 10% of the patients needed other sophisticated techniques, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL), laser-induced shock-wave lithotripsy (LISL), or extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). The local expertise and availability of equipment determines the choice of method used. In general, EHL or LISL is used for impacted CBD stones including stones in Mirizzi syndrome refractory to ML. ESWL is best suited for intrahepatic stones. Permanent stenting can be offered to poor risk patients instead of extensive procedures to clear the bile duct. Using currently available nonsurgical techniques, fewer than 1% of all patients with bile duct stones still require surgical intervention.     

Posterior stabilization of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with a Leeds-Keio artificial ligament. A biomechanical analysis in a porcine vertebral model

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) appears to be the best imaging method for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. The aim of this preliminary, prospective, controlled study was to assess the accuracy of EUS and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. METHODS: From December 1995 through April 1997, all patients referred because of suspicion of the presence of common bile duct stones were included in the study. EUS and MRCP were performed. Each examination was performed by a different operator unaware of the result of the other procedure. The definitive diagnosis was established by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with sphincterotomy or a surgical procedure. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (18 men, 25 women) with a mean age of 60.9 +/- 14.5 years (range 25 to 81 years) were included in the study. Eleven patients were excluded because of unavailability of magnetic resonance imaging(n = 5) or EUS (n = 6). Ten patients (31.2%) had choledocholithiasis. For this diagnosis, the sensitivity of EUS was 100%, the specificity was 95.4%, the positive predictive value was 90.9%, and the negative predictive value was 100%. The corresponding values for MRCP were 100%, 72.7%, 62.5%, and 100%, not significantly different from EUS results. The accuracy of EUS was 96.9%, and that of MRCP was 82.2%. CONCLUSION: This preliminary study confirmed EUS as an accurate and noninvasive procedure for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. MRCP, which had a high sensitivity and high negative predictive value, might be an accurate technique for patients with a contraindication to EUS.     

Outcome of mechanical lithotripsy of bile duct stones in an unselected series of 704 patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This paper evaluates the potential benefit of non mechanical bile duct stone lithotripsy techniques. The efficacy, limitations and risks of mechanical lithotripsy as first choice procedure were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed by Erlangen-type papillotomes, stone extraction by Olympus baskets and mechanical lithotripsy by the Wurbs-system. In an unselected series of 704 patients, everyone with common bile and hepatic duct stones (independent of size, number, location and stone consistency) was included in the study. RESULTS: Complete stone clearance by endoscopic sphincterotomy and basket extraction was possible in 87.6%. Additional mechanical lithotripsy led to a success rate of 98.4% and in combination with ESWL of 98.5%. In 11 patients without possibility of endoscopic stone removal (1.6%), 4 had no access transpapillary (B-II-situs or duodenal diverticulum), 5 anatomical problems (S-shaped common bile duct, intrahepatic stones or impacted stones in cystic duct orifice), and 2 refused further endoscopic interventions. Complication rate was 1.4% (thereof 1.1% successful treatment by endoscopic or surgical means), lethality rate 0.3%. CONCLUSIONS: A very high rate of stone clearance by standard endoscopic procedures is possible. In those patients where mechanical lithotripsy is not successful, other non-surgical lithotriptic procedures either cannot be applied because of anatomical reasons or if performed, the improvement in success rate is marginal.     

Sulbactam/ampicillin in comparison with cefuroxime for infections of the lower respiratory tract. Results of a prospective, randomized comparative study

Gallbladder removal using laparoscopic techniques has rapidly been adopted by surgeons around the world. Questions have been raised concerning laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including the safety of the operation, its implications for management of common bile duct stones, and the means by which surgeons should be trained. In the present series, 424 patients were referred to a single surgeon for cholecystectomy during a 22-month period. A traditional open cholecystectomy was performed in 9 patients (2.1%) because of presumed contraindications to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was attempted in the remaining 415 patients (97.9%). On the basis of preoperative investigations, 19 patients (4.6%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction were performed in the 13 patients (3.1%) demonstrating choledocholithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was converted to an open operation in 8 patients (1.9%) owing to dense adhesions, obscure anatomy, or cholangiographic abnormalities. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed in 407 patients (96%) in 95 +/- 2 minutes (mean +/- SEM). Surgical trainees were involved in all operations and performed 68% of the procedures under supervision. Cystic duct cholangiograms were obtained selectively in 129 patients (30.4%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 3 patients, including 1 patient with a minor injury to the common bile duct (0.2%). There was no perioperative mortality, and major complications occurred in 6 patients (1.4%). Minor complications were seen in 12 others (2.8%), and one patient required reoperation for a trocar injury to the jejunum. Prolonged follow-up has revealed one case of asymptomatic retained common bile duct stones (0.2%). Laparoscopic cholecystectomy can therefore be performed in more than 95% of patients with no mortality and minimal morbidity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prediction of recurrent choledocholithiasis by quantitative cholescintigraphy in patients after endoscopic sphincterotomy

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is widely used for the removal of stones from the bile duct, but stones recur in about one fifth of patients. AIMS: To investigate hepatic clearance by quantitative cholescintigraphy (QC) in patients after EST and to discern the relationship between biliary emptying and stone recurrence. METHODS: One hundred and forty nine patients who had EST and clearance of the bile duct for choledocholithiasis were selected. All patients were confirmed to have complete EST by sphincter of Oddi manometry and underwent QC soon after normalisation of liver function. Regular clinical follow up was performed for each patient. RESULTS: During a mean 36 month follow up, 22 (14.8%) patients developed recurrent stones in the bile duct. Irrespective of the status of the gall bladder, patients with recurrent stones had a slower hepatic clearance of radioisotope during QC compared with patients without stone recurrence, but only the differences in cholecystectomised patients had statistical significance. After carrying out multivariate analysis, one parameter of QC, percentage clearance of maximal count at 45 minutes, was found to be the only significant factor for stone recurrence. All recurrent stones in the common bile duct were successfully removed at endoscopy. CONCLUSION: Slower hepatic clearance as shown by QC is an important factor responsible for stone recurrence after sphincter ablation.     

In vitro activity and clinical evaluation of cefixime in urinary tract infection

BACKGROUND: The management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) in the era of operative laparoscopy is evolving. Several minimally invasive techniques to remove CBDS have been described, including preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), postoperative ERCP, lithotripsy, laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration, and laparoscopic choledochotomy with common bile duct exploration (CBDE). Because of the risks and limitations of these procedures, we utilize laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents as an adjunct to CBDE. METHODS: Sixteen patients underwent laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) by either choledochotomy or the transcystic technique with placement of endobiliary stents. These patients were identified during laparoscopic cholecystectomy as having occult choledocholithiasis, using routine dynamic intraoperative cholangiography. RESULTS: CBDS were successfully removed in all patients as demonstrated by completion cholangiography and intraoperative choledochoscopy. Eighty percent of patients were discharged the following day; the first three patients in this series were observed for 48 h prior to discharge. No patient required T-tube placement and closed suction drains were removed the morning after surgery. Stents were removed endoscopically at 1 month. Six- to 30-month follow-up demonstrates no complications to date. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic endobiliary stenting reduces operative morbidity, eliminates the complications of T-tubes, and allows patients to return to unrestricted activity quickly. We recommend laparoscopically placed endobiliary stents in patients undergoing LCBDE.     

Comparison of routine and selective endoscopic retrograde cholangiography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy

To evaluate the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) before laparoscopic cholecystectomy, we compared the frequency of concomitant common bile duct stones, their clinical outcome, and the frequency of bile duct injury between a group of 128 patients with routine preoperative ERC (group A) and 1010 patients with selective ERC (group B). Overall, 48 patients (4.2%) had duct stones, but the predictive signs were absent in six of them (12.5%). The stones were demonstrated by ERC and removed by sphincterotomy in all 11 patients in group A. Of 37 patients in group B, 22 were diagnosed by selective ERC and underwent endoscopic removal. Of four patients whose stones were found by operative cholangiography, one had immediate open surgery, another passed a stone spontaneously, and the other two underwent postoperative sphincterotomy, which failed in one. The stones were not recognized until pain recurred in the remaining 11 patients. Sphincterotomy was successful in nine patients but failed in the other two. Thus postoperative sphincterotomy failed in 3 of 13 patients (23%), necessitating open surgery. Forty-two patients overall (3.7%) had aberrant biliary tract anatomy, which did not lead to bile duct injury in any of the patients. Morbidity of routine ERC (3.1%) was lower than that of selective ERC (7.4%) (p < 0.05). It should be noted that a certain proportion of duct stones may be missed by selective ERC, necessitating laparotomy when sphincterotomy fails. The routine use of preoperative ERC may be justified at institutions where the expertise is available, at least until laparoscopic lithotomy becomes easy.