Thrombolysis for evolving myocardial infarction in a rural primary care clinic

Early thrombolytic therapy gives maximum benefit in acute myocardial infarction. In remote rural areas with no mobile intensive care service there is a significant delay between onset of symptoms and administration of thrombolytic therapy which has a critical impact on revascularization. Thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase 1,500,000 U was given in a primary care rural clinic to 2 patients with evolving myocardial infarction 45-50 minutes from onset of symptoms. In both patients, who were transported to hospital after the therapy, there were clinical signs of reperfusion. There were no complications during treatment or transportation. We conclude that thrombolytic therapy given for evolving myocardial infarction in a rural primary care clinic is possible and safe.     

Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the relative clinical utility of direct coronary angioplasty compared with that of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The relative merits of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and direct coronary angioplasty as treatment for acute myocardial infarction are incompletely understood, and randomized trials of these treatments have been extremely limited. METHODS: One hundred patients with ST segment elevation presenting to a single high volume interventional center within 6 h of the onset of chest pain were randomized to receive either streptokinase (1.2 million U intravenously over 1 h) or immediate catheterization and direct coronary angioplasty. Patients were excluded for age > or = 75 years, prior bypass surgery, Q wave infarction in the region of ischemia or excessive risk of bleeding. All patients were then treated with aspirin (325 mg orally/day) and heparin (1,000 U intravenously/h) for 48 h until catheterization was performed to determine the primary study end point, namely, infarct-related artery patency at 48 h. Secondary end points were in-hospital death, left ventricular ejection fraction at 48 h and time to treatment. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups. Overall patient age was 56 +/- 10 years, 83% of patients were male, 11% had prior infarction, 40% had anterior infarction and 97% were in Killip class I or II. Although time to treatment was delayed in the angioplasty group (238 +/- 112 vs. 179 +/- 98 min, p = 0.005), there was no difference in 48-h infarct-related artery patency or left ventricular ejection fraction (patency 74% vs. 80%; ejection fraction 59 +/- 13% vs. 57 +/- 13%; angioplasty vs. streptokinase, p = NS for both). There were no major bleeding events, and the mortality rate with angioplasty (6%) and streptokinase (2%) did not differ (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intravenous thrombolytic therapy might be preferred over coronary angioplasty for most patients because of the often shorter time to treatment.     

Clinical and angiographic features of patients with an occluded versus a patent infarct vessel after intravenous streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction

Despite early treatment with thrombolytic agents for acute myocardial infarction, a significant portion of patients fail to achieve a patent infarct artery. To study the various factors related to achieving patency in the infarct vessel, 201 patients who received streptokinase within six hours of symptoms were studied. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization during the same hospitalization at 5.40 +/- 3.26 days after admission. Forty-five (22.4%) patients were found to have an occluded infarct artery (group 1) and 156 (77.6%) had a patent infarct vessel (group 2). There was no difference in the time from onset of symptoms to receiving streptokinase between the two groups. The two groups were similar to each other with regard to age, gender, history of myocardial infarction or angina, and major risk factors for coronary disease. Coagulation parameters before and after streptokinase therapy, reflecting the lytic state, were similar in both groups. The left ventricular end diastolic pressure was significantly higher and the left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2. These observations suggest that despite early initiation of thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction, a significant portion of patients fail to achieve a patent infarct artery. This failure cannot be explained by the observed clinical parameters or the lytic state after streptokinase.     

Dietary-sodium-induced cardiac remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rat versus Wistar-Kyoto rat

OBJECTIVE: To determine lengths and causes of pre- and in-hospital delays in thrombolytic treatment. DESIGN: A prospective national survey covering 48 of the 51 Finnish university, central and general hospitals to obtain basic data before the start of a public campaign to shorten patient-related delay in acute myocardial infarction. SUBJECTS: One thousand and twelve consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction who received thrombolytic therapy over 3 months in 1995 and who represent 40% of all patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The median interval between onset of infarction symptoms and initiation of thrombolytic therapy was 160 min (30-647). Only 13% of the patients received thrombolysis within 60 min and 38% within 120 min. The median time from the onset of symptoms to the call for help was 60 min (5-491), and no difference was found in patients with or without a history of previous myocardial infarction (60 and 64 min, respectively). Only 52% of the patients called to the dispatch centre. The median delay from calling for help to hospital arrival was 40 min (10-170). The median in-hospital door-to-needle thrombolysis delay was 40 min (12-196). In 13% of hospitals the median delay was more than 60 min. The emergency physician encountered difficulties in decision making in 33% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Only 38% of the patient received thrombolysis within 2 h of onset of symptoms. Patient-related delay before they sought help accounted for the major portion of the total treatment delay. Thus the findings emphasize the importance of prompt action when people are confronted with an acute heart attack. Reorganizing the emergency medical service and emergency department routines is also a necessary target to shorten thrombolysis delays. The delay attributable to transporting patients could be shortened by initiating thrombolytic treatment in the pre-hospital setting. In Finnish hospitals, door-to-needle delay was acceptable in cases with clear indications for thrombolysis. However, emergency physicians often had diagnostic difficulties, which led to remarkably longer in-hospital delays.     

Evaluation of drug treatment of myocardial infarction in public hospitals of Andalusia. GAUME (Andalusian Group for performance of Studies on Drug Utilization)

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has changed over the last decade. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of AMI in the clinical practice, with special emphasis in thrombolytic therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective drug utilization survey, collecting data from 26 hospitals belonging to the Andalusian Health Service, Spain, during one month period. Pharmacologic treatment in the first 24 h was obtained. RESULTS: Out of 379 patients recruited, 52.8% received thrombolytic therapy, although another 19% could have obtained some benefit from that therapy. Alteplase was the most frequently used thrombolytic (65.5%). The regimen prescribed was mainly that followed in GUSTO Study (45.8%) or double bolus (43.5%). In a high percentage of patients the thrombolytic selection was not made according to the results of the literature. Women and patients older than 75 years were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy. There was a high utilization of aspirin (89.7%), nitrates (84.4%) and heparin (83.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy was prescribed in a higher percentage of patients than is reported in other trials. In spite of that, thrombolytics should have been used in more patients. As alteplase does not have a definitive benefit over streptokinase, protocol is needed when selecting a thrombolytic agent.     

A two-year retrospective study of patients with acute myocardial infarction in a Norwegian county hospital

The article describes a follow-up study extending over a period of two years (1992-93) of patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction to a Norwegian district hospital. The mortality was 13.8%. In Norway, treatment of acute myocardial infarction is generally standardized, with only minor variations between hospitals. This follow-up illustrates that patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction who do not require emergency surgical intervention can be safely treated in a district hospital.     

Thrombolysis following myocardial infarct. European Secondary Prevention Study

For evaluation of the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction, all cases of ten Zurich hospitals (278, 184 men and 94 women) in the period from 1 January to 31 March 1993 were analyzed retrospectively. 223 patients were released from hospital, 55 died. A follow-up was done 6 months after the patient's discharge by means of a questionnaires to the family doctor (return rate: 65.9%). 48.5% of patients were referred to hospital within the first 6 h. after onset of symptoms, 64% within the first 12 h. 28% (n = 76) of the patients received a thrombolytic therapy, of which 91% (n = 69) got streptokinase and 9% (n = 7) got tissue plasminogen activator. In 81% of the cases the thrombolytic therapy was done within the first hour in hospital, in accumulated 97% of the cases within two hours. In the age group under 65 years (39% of the patients, n = 109), 48 patients received thrombolysis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.0). In the age group between 65 and 74 years (24.5 % of the patients, n = 68), 19 patients received thrombolysis (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.42-0.99; p < 0.05), and in the age group over 74 years (36.5% of the patients, n = 101), 9 patients were received thrombolysis (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05-0.28; p < 0.0001). 31% of the patients (n = 46) received a coronary angiography, 15% (n = 22) had coronary angioplasty, and 11% (n = 1) received coronary bypass surgery. There is evidence that there should be more importance attached to early hospitalization, if acute myocardial infarction is suspected. Thereby age alone should be considered as a contraindication for thrombolytic therapy. The issue of assumed underuse of thrombolytic therapy should be investigated all over Switzerland.     

Symptomatic urinary tract infection in women in primary health care. Bacteriological, clinical and diagnostic aspects in relation to host response to infection

Myocardial infarctions which are derived from embolic source have an incidence of 5-13%. They are at risk of systemic embolism. The pathogenesis of myocardial infarction is similar to that of those myocardial infarction whose etiology is atherosclerosis. This make it susceptible to thrombolysis. We report 3 patients with either inactive rheumatic heart disease, coarctation of the aorta or mechanical valvular prosthesis as the probable causes of an embolic infarction. It was located in the posterior-inferior region with a dorsal extension. These patients were treated with intravenous streptokinase. The three of them fulfilled criteria for myocardial reperfusion. Two of them suffered post-infarction angina. In the first case reocclusion of the righ coronary artery was observed; thus a saphenous vein graft was undertaken. In the second, the persistence of thrombus required three month treatment with anticoagulants. The third patient showed not coronary lesions. In conclusion, thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase in acute infarction of embolic origin prevents the progression of ischemic damage and betters the clinical outcome of the patient. Furthermore such disease should be suspected in patients that have risk factors for systemic embolism and normal coronary arteries and with obstruction of a single vessel.     

Possibilities and limitations of thrombolysis. Benefits and risk in acute myocardial infarct, lung embolism, pelvic and leg vein thrombosis as well as cerebrovascular accidents

The indications for thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis and ischemic stroke are reviewed on the basis of a risk-benefit analysis. There is strong evidence that thrombolysis benefits the majority of patients with acute myocardial infarction. Nevertheless, the overall proportion of patients actually receiving this therapy is disappointingly low (10-30%). Efforts are mainly required in minimizing delays in initiating thrombolysis (patient, doctor, in-hospital) and in providing thrombolytic therapy to an extended proportion of qualifying patients. This implies that many traditional but inappropriate exclusion criteria (e.g. age, presentation 6 to 12 hours after onset of symptoms, hypertension, reinfarction, brief cardiopulmonary resuscitation) are unfounded. Depending on duration of symptoms, infarct localization and age, we favor a differentiated thrombolytic regimen with rt-PA or streptokinase. In contrast to acute myocardial infarction, the risk-benefit ratio for the other thrombotic disorders discussed favours thrombolytic therapy only in a minority of carefully selected patients.     

Call to needle times after acute myocardial infarction in urban and rural areas in northeast Scotland: prospective observational study

OBJECTIVE: To determine call to needle times and consider how best to provide timely thrombolytic treatment for patients with acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: City, suburban, and country practices referring patients to a single district general hospital in northeast Scotland. SUBJECTS: 1046 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction given thrombolytic treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time from patients' calls for medical help until receipt of opiate or thrombolytic treatment, measured against a call to needle time of 90 minutes or less, as proposed by the British Heart Foundation. RESULTS: General practitioners were the first medical contact in 97% (528/544) of calls by country patients and 68% (340/502) of city and suburban patients. When opiate was given by general practitioners, median call to opiate time was about 30 minutes (95% within 90 minutes) in city, suburbs, and country; call to opiate delay was about 60 minutes in city and suburban patients calling "999" for an ambulance. One third of country patients received thrombolytic treatment from their general practitioners with a median call to thrombolysis time of 45 minutes (93% within 90 minutes); this compares with 150 minutes (5% within 90 minutes) when this treatment was deferred until after hospital admission. In the city and suburbs, no thrombolytic treatment was given outside hospital, and only a minority of patients received it within 90 minutes of calling; median call to thrombolysis time was 95 (46% within 90 minutes) minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The first medical contact after acute myocardial infarction is most commonly with a general practitioner. This contact provides the optimum opportunity to give thrombolytic treatment within the British Heart Foundation's guideline.     

Pharmacologic profile of survivors of acute myocardial infarction at United States academic hospitals

Optimal drug therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is well described in the medical literature. However, data on the actual pharmacologic management of patients surviving AMI at academic hospitals is unavailable. The purpose of this study was to document treatment profiles in 500 patients surviving AMI at 12 academic hospitals in the United States. These profiles were compared with established guidelines and were evaluated for trends. Overall, thrombolytics (streptokinase > or = tissue-type plasminogen activator) were administered in 29% of the patients, with a greater proportion of patients receiving beta-blockers than calcium channel antagonists in the initial 72 hours (61% vs 40%; p < 0.005) and at discharge (51% vs 35%; p < 0.005). Further, women were less likely than men to receive thrombolytic therapy (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61; confidence interval [CI], 0.54 to 0.69) or beta-blocker therapy within the first 72 hours (OR = 0.61; CI, 0.55 to 0.67) or at hospital discharge (OR = 0.53; CI, 0.48 to 0.58). Overall, improvements could still be made in the number of patients who receive thrombolytic and acute and chronic beta-blocker therapies after AMI, particularly in women. Changes in treatment profiles may be a reflection of the publication of large clinical trials.     

Withholding thrombolysis in patients with diabetes mellitus and acute myocardial infarction

The benefits of thrombolytic therapy in a patient with diabetes having a myocardial infarction are now well accepted but this treatment may be withheld inappropriately because of concerns about retinal haemorrhage. We therefore examined whether junior doctors alter their use of thrombolysis for the treatment of acute myocardial infarctions according to the type of diabetic retinopathy present. A questionnaire asking whether thrombolysis would be given to a 50-year-old male smoker with insulin-treated diabetes and an acute anterior MI was shown, with four unlabelled retinal photographs, to all doctors prescribing thrombolytic therapy in a south London teaching hospital and an affiliated district general hospital. In all, 24 medical SHOs, 16 medical registrars/specialist registrars, 3 medical senior registrars, and 23 casualty SHOs were interviewed. Of these 89% would thrombolyse such a patient with normal fundi, 55% with background diabetic retinopathy, 54 % if this also involved the macula, and 26% if they saw proliferative retinopathy. The more senior grades were more aggressive in their approach. As we believe that all patients with an acute anterior myocardial infarction and diabetes should be considered for thrombolysis irrespective of their retinal appearance these results suggest thrombolytic therapy is being withheld inappropriately.     

Prehospital thrombolytic therapy of myocardial infarction in Northern Norway. How to improve the service for patients in sparsely-populated areas?

Up to now, thrombolytic treatment in myocardial infarction has been restricted to coronary care departments in Norwegian hospitals. Owing to the highly significant impact of the time elapsing between onset of symptoms and thrombolytic treatment, it has been a challenge to offer patients in remote areas early treatment. The rescue helicopter in Northern Norway is manned by an anaesthesiologist. By taking advantage of this, in combination with strict diagnostic criteria, prehospital treatment with streptokinase is now offered in addition to pain relief, oxygen, nitrates and aspirin, and observation against arrhythmia. By these means, patients in remote areas can receive thrombolytic treatment without the delay caused by transportation and in-hospital examination, and a high level of safety is maintained. It still remains, however, to shorten the patients' and the doctors' delay in notifying the helicopter. It is suggested, that all anaesthesiologist-manned air ambulances implement this technique after consulting local general practitioners and cardiologists.     

Pitfalls in the economic evaluation of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction. The impact of national differences in the cost of thrombolytics and of differences in the efficacy across patient subgroups

BACKGROUND: The economic evaluation of the results of the Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Artery (GUSTO) trial found that recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is more cost-effective than streptokinase for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. AIM: We evaluated the impact on a cost effectiveness analysis, of the differences in the cost of thrombolytics among countries and of differences in efficacy across patient subgroups. METHODS: We considered the crude costs of streptokinase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America, and the 30-day mortality found in the GUSTO trial. We calculated the incremental costs for each life saved when streptokinase is substituted by recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. We also calculated the incremental costs for each life saved for two protocols implying a selective use of streptokinase and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (age-selective protocol: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients < or = 75 years, streptokinase in older patients; site-selective protocol: recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in anterior acute myocardial infarction, streptokinase in non-anterior acute myocardial infarction). RESULTS: The incremental costs for each life saved when streptokinase is substituted by recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in all GUSTO patients vary greatly among countries: the incremental costs for each life saved are 31%, 45%, and 97% higher in Germany, Italy, and the United States of America compared to the United Kingdom. The use of a site-selective protocol implies a halved cost-effectiveness ratio compared to the use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in all cases of acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The cost-efficacy of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator vs streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction varies greatly among countries due to differences in the cost of drugs. (2) A selective use of thrombolytics for some sites of infarction is more cost-effective than the exclusive use of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator.     

Aortic aneurysm leak after streptokinase treatment for myocardial infarction

A leak from an abdominal aortic aneurysm following the administration of streptokinase treatment for myocardial infarction is reported. It is important to assess candidates for cardiac thrombolytic therapy for aortic pathology and give such treatment with extreme caution in those patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms.     

Differential effects of tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase on infarct size and on rate of enzyme release: influence of early infarct related artery patency. The GUSTO Enzyme Substudy

BACKGROUND: The recent international GUSTO trial of 41,021 patients with acute myocardial infarction demonstrated improved 90-min infarct related artery patency as well as reduced mortality in patients treated with an accelerated regimen of tissue plasminogen activator, compared to patients treated with streptokinase. A regimen combining tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase yielded intermediate results. The present study investigated the effects of treatment on infarct size and enzyme release kinetics in a subgroup of these patients. METHODS: A total of 553 patients from 15 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Four thrombolytic strategies were compared: streptokinase with subcutaneous heparin, streptokinase with intravenous (i.v.) heparin, tissue plasminogen activator with i.v. heparin, and streptokinase plus tissue plasminogen activator with i.v. heparin. The activity of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase (HBDH) in plasma was centrally analysed and infarct size was defined as cumulative HBDH release per litre of plasma within 72 h of the first symptoms (Q(72)). Patency of the infarct-related vessel was determined by angiography in 159 patients, 90 min after treatment. RESULTS: Infarct size was 3.72 g-eq.1(-1) in patients with adequate coronary perfusion (TIMI-3) at the 90 min angiogram and larger in patients with TIMI-2 (4.35 g-eq.1(-1) or TIMI 0-1 (5.07 g-eq.1(-1) flow (P = 0.024). In this subset of the GUSTO angiographic study, early coronary patency rates (TIMI 2 + 3) were similar in the two streptokinase groups (53 and 46%). Higher, but similar, patency rates were observed in the tissue plasminogen activator and combination therapy groups (87 and 90%). Median infarct size for the four treatment groups, expressed in gram-equivalents (g-eq) of myocardium, was 4.4, 4.5, 3.9 and 3.9 g-eq per litre of plasma (P = 0.04 for streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator). Six hours after the first symptoms, respectively 5.3, 6.6, 14.0 and 13.6% of total HBDH release was complete (P < 0.0001 for streptokinase vs tissue plasminogen activator). CONCLUSIONS: Rapid and complete coronary reperfusion salvages myocardial tissue, resulting in limitation of infarct size and accelerated release of proteins from the myocardium. Treatment with tissue plasminogen activator, resulting in earlier reperfusion was more effective in reducing infarct size than the streptokinase regimens, which contributes to the differences in survival between treatment groups in the GUSTO trial.     

What are the trends in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy in recent years in patients after myocardial infarct?

The authors compared the status of pharmacotherapy in 587 patients with myocardial infarction in 1991 according to the MONICA study, in hospitals of six districts in the Czech Republic, age group 25-64 years with data for 1995 assembled by means of questionnaires in 749 patients of the same age group, who were after myocardial infarction in selected spas. Thrombolytic treatment proved quite inadequate in 1988-1993 in six districts of the Czech Republic, although it rose slightly from mere 2.9% in 1988 to 11.1% in 1993. In 1995 25.4% patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated by thrombolytic treatment. Conversely anti-platelet treatment was very satisfactory in 1991 as well as in 1995. Promising was also the increase in treatment with beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors in 1995 as compared with 1991. Also the percentage of patients treated by hypolipidaemic treatment increased in 1995. This work indicates the favourable trends in pharmacotherapy of patients with acute myocardial infarction in the acute stage as well as in patients after myocardial infarction.     

The 60 Minutes Myocardial Infarction Project. Characteristics on admission and clinical outcome in patients with reinfarction compared to patients with a first infarction

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate parameters that characterize patients with myocardial reinfarction as compared to patients with a first infarction in clinical practice, and possibly to determine their clinical outcome. METHODS: The 60 minutes Myocardial Project is a German multicentre prospective observational study in which 136 hospitals are participating. Fourteen thousand, nine hundred and eighty consecutive patients with acute Q wave myocardial infarction were included from July 1992 to September 1994. RESULTS: Out of these 14,980 patients, there were 2854 (19%) with reinfarction and 12,126 (81%) with a first infarction. Patients with a reinfarction arrived at the hospital 24 min earlier than patients with a first infarction (pre-hospital delay 156 vs 180 min; P < 0.001); the door-to-needle time with reinfarction was longer (38 vs 30 min; P < 0.001); however, patients with reinfarction were older (69 vs 66 years; P < 0.001), had a lower rate of a diagnostic first ECG (54 vs 71%; P < 0.001) and received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than patients with a first infarction (46 vs 52%; P < 0.001). A low number of patients received primary PTCA ( n = 205) since only a few hospitals offered a primary PTCA service at the time the study was performed. In patients with reinfarction, there were more reasons as to why thrombolytic therapy was not given (24 vs 21%; P < 0.001). Left bundle branch block occurred more frequently in patients with reinfarction (15 vs 8%; P < 0.001). The intra-hospital course in patients with reinfarction was associated with an increase of complications and intra-hospital death (23 vs 15%; P < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Although reinfarction patients arrived earlier at hospital than patients with a first infarction, the former received thrombolytic therapy less frequently than the latter. Patients with reinfarction were older, more frequently had a non-diagnostic ECG on admission and had a higher rate of contraindications against thrombolytic therapy.     

Lipid peroxidation in healthy fetuses, preterm and fullterm neonates

Thrombolytic therapy has been accepted in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Given historical recommendations that thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated in patients receiving CPR, its potential clinical benefit for facilitating conversion of rhythm in patients in refractory cardiac arrest has not been investigated. We present three case reports in which patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction had a witnessed cardiac arrest in the ED. Standard Advanced Cardiac Life Support measures failed in all three cases. A bolus infusion of tissue plasminogen activator was administered during CPR in refractory ventricular fibrillation (two cases) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (one case). Patients were given tissue plasminogen activator and had defibrillation, followed by a spontaneous return of circulation, with resuscitation and subsequent discharge. No postarrest sequelae were observed as a result of thrombolytic use during the resuscitative process. We conclude that bolus thrombolytic infusions during CPR may facilitate spontaneous return of circulation in select patients with confirmed acute myocardial infarction, witnessed cardiac arrest in the ED, and refractory ventricular fibrillation or tachycardia.     

Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction-outcome optimization methods

Early reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce the extent of myocardial necrosis and to improve short and long term prognosis. Gender, smoking, age and site of infarct location may be regarded as prognostic factors for the outcome of AMI and of thrombolytic therapy with streptokinase (STK). The aim of this study was to identify factors, which are related to the results of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. 156 patients (122 males and 34 females) treated with STK were retrospectively analyzed: they were subdivided into 3 groups according to the presumed success of thrombolytic therapy based on the accepted clinical and angiographic TIMI flow criteria. Group 1 = successful (88 patients), group 2 = probably successful (20 patients) and group 3 = failed thrombolysis (48 patients). Multiple regression analysis showed that Killip class (p = 0.0005), time from pain onset to thrombolysis initiation (p = 0.02) and the time of the day in which thrombolysis began (p = 0.037) are independent major predictive factors for successful thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI. Gender, age, smoking and some risk factors are not of similar predictive power. These results may guide us in the optimization of thrombolytic therapy by STK in AMI, different dose regimens for different times of day and probably preference for primary PTCA in the early morning hours.