项重写系统弱基终止性的归纳证明

1.引言项重写系统是一种受到广泛研究和应用的形式计算模型。一个项重写系统由一组称为重写规则的定向等式组成。例如,下面的R是一个由五个重写规则组成的、定义用({0,s})表示的自然数集N上的两倍函数d(x)=2×n:N→N的项重写系统:     

基于重写的成批归纳证明技术

1 引言 归纳法是刻划软硬件行为和性质的一种重要方法,归纳证明的自动化始终是一个研究热点.近二十年来,涌现出了大批证明方法和实验系统.这些成果大致可分为两类:第一类方法使用项结构上的显式归纳论证,其典型工具是1979年由Boyer和Moore提出的NQTHM证明器[1].     

项重写系统的并行实现方案

项重写系统的并行归约可以提高归约的效率，在无共享内存的Ｔｒａｎｓｐｕｔｅｒ网络上实现时要考虑任务的分配，项的拼装，归约任务的控制等问题，其中怎么样减少机间的机内进程的通信慢提高系统效果的关键。本文从控制方式角度讨论在不同拓扑结构的Ｔｒａｎｓｐｕｔｅｒ网络上实现项重写系统的方案，重点介绍基于树形结构下的控制方法，进程安排和通讯形式。     

依赖项重写系统及其在程序设计语言中的应用

面重写系统是一种简洁通用的计算模型，在许多领域中有着重要的应用。     

重写系统的模块分解

Ｍｉｄｄｅｌｄｏｒｐ和Ｔｏｙａｍａ证明，强加构造原则到项重写系统可获得完备概念的模块性，并且系统分解成的各部分间可共亨函数符号和重量写规则。本文推广他们的结论，当构造性的项重写系统引用定义在其它系统中的函数符号时，完备概念的模块性仍保持。该结论对代数规范和基于项重写的编程语言等方面是很有意义的。     

项重写的图实现

图重写能够有效地实现项重写。文章从项重写的图实现的角度出发，研究了图重写模拟项重写的正确性和完备性：在无环出现的情况下，图重写对一切项重写下正确；在无环出现的条件下，图重写对左线性合流的项重写是完备的。     

基于重写技术的自动定理证明

重写技术是处理等式理论的一种有效方法,它已成功地应用到带等词的一阶谓词逻辑中定理的自动证明。本文介绍基于重写的定理证明方法的基本思想,以及几种具体的证明技术,最后将这类方法与经典的归结证明方法加以比较。     

关于归纳证明的探讨

归纳定理证明是一种难度较大且较有前途的一种自动定理证明方法。较早的归纳定理证明器是Boyer一Moore于1979年提出的BM证明器,BM证明器采用的是传统的结构归纳法,对所证公式中的每个函数项都根据其所谓归纳模板提出相应的归纳方案,然后对这个归纳方案进行分析、比较和整理,得出整个     

半正则重写系统及其合流性

本文着重研究重写系统的合流性,通过引入符号测度的概念,本文定义了半正则重写系统,并证明了半正则重写系统的合流性。     

模式化简序与重写系统的终止性

本文引入了模式化简序的概念,并给出了基于模式化简序的重写系统终止性判别方法。本文还着重研究了模式递归路径序,同时定义了重写规则相对模式集的上下扩张概念,以此给出了用模式递归路径序判别终止性的有效方法,原有的递归路径序是模式递归路径序的一个特例。     

Matrix Interpretations for Proving Termination of Term Rewriting

We present a new method for automatically proving termination of term rewriting. It is based on the well-known idea of interpretation of terms where every rewrite step causes a decrease, but instead of the usual natural numbers we use vectors of natural numbers, ordered by a particular nontotal well-founded ordering. Function symbols are interpreted by linear mappings represented by matrices. This method allows us to prove termination and relative termination. A modification of the latter, in which strict steps are only allowed at the top, turns out to be helpful in combination with the dependency pair transformation. By bounding the dimension and the matrix coefficients, the search problem becomes finite. Our implementation transforms it to a Boolean satisfiability problem (SAT), to be solved by a state-of-the-art SAT solver.     

Vicious Circles in Orthogonal Term Rewriting Systems

In this paper we first study the difference between Weak Normalization (WN) and Strong Normalization (SN), in the framework of first order orthogonal rewriting systems. With the help of the Erasure Lemma we establish a Pumping Lemma, yielding information about exceptional terms, defined as terms that are WN but not SN. A corollary is that if an orthogonal TRS is WN, there are no cyclic reductions in finite reduction graphs. This is a stepping stone towards the insight that orthogonal TRSs with the property WN, do not admit cyclic reductions at all.     

Proving termination of context-sensitive rewriting by transformation

Context-sensitive rewriting (CSR) is a restriction of rewriting that forbids reductions on selected arguments of functions. With CSR, we can achieve a terminating behavior with non-terminating term rewriting systems, by pruning (all) infinite rewrite sequences. Proving termination of CSR has been recently recognized as an interesting problem with several applications in the fields of term rewriting and programming languages. Several methods have been developed for proving termination of CSR. Specifically, a number of transformations that permit treating this problem as a standard termination problem have been described. The main goal of this paper is to contribute to a better comprehension and practical use of transformations for proving termination of CSR. We provide new completeness results regarding the use of the transformations in two restricted (but relevant) settings: (a) proofs of termination of canonical CSR and (b) proofs of termination of CSR by using transformations together with simplification orderings. We have also made an experimental evaluation of the transformations, which complements the theoretical analysis from a practical point of view. This leads to new hierarchies of the transformations which are useful to guide their practical use when implementing tools for proving termination of CSR.     

Autowrite: A Tool for Term Rewrite Systems and Tree Automata

Autowrite is an experimental software tool written in Common Lisp Oriented System (CLOS) which handles term rewrite systems and bottom-up tree automata. A graphical interface written using McCLIM, (the free implementation of the CLIM specification) frees the user of any Lisp knowledge. Software and documentation can be found at http://dept-info.labri.u-bordeaux.fr/~idurand/autowrite. Autowrite was initially designed to check call-by-need properties of term rewrite systems. For this purpose, it implements the tree automata constructions used in [F. Jacquemard. Decidable approximations of term rewriting systems. In Proc. 7th RTA, volume 1103 of LNCS, pages 362–376, 1996; I. Durand and A. Middeldorp. Decidable call by need computations in term rewriting (extended abstract). In Proc. 14th CADE, volume 1249 of LNAI, pages 4–18, 1997; Irène Durand and Aart Middeldorp. On the complexity of deciding call-by-need. Technical Report 1196–98, LaBRI, 1998; T. Nagaya and Y. Toyama. Decidability for left-linear growing term rewriting systems. Information and Computation, 178(2):499–514, 2002] and many useful operations on terms, term rewrite systems and tree automata.     

Mechanizing Weakly Ground Termination Proving of Term Rewriting Systems by Structural and Cover-Set Inductions

The paper presents three formal proving methods for generalized weakly ground terminating property, i.e., weakly terminating property in a restricted domain of a term rewriting system, one with structural induction, one with cover-set induction, and the third without induction, and describes their mechanization based on a meta-computation model for term rewriting systems-dynamic term rewriting calculus. The methods can be applied to non-terminating, non-confluent and/or non-left-linear term rewriting systems. They can do "forward proving" by applying propositions in the proof, as well as "backward proving" by discovering lemmas during the proof.     

On Term Graphs as an Adhesive Category

The recent interest in bisimulation congruences for reduction systems, stimulated by the research on general (often graphical) frameworks for nominal calculi, has brought forward many proposals for categorical formalisms where relevant properties of observational equivalences could be auto- matically verified.Interestingly, some of these formalisms also identified suitable categories where the standard tools and techniques developed for the double-pushout approach to graph transformation [A. Corradini, U. Montanari, F. Rossi, H. Ehrig, R. Heckel and M. Löwe, Algebraic approaches to graph transformation I: Basic concepts and double pushout approach, in: G. Rozenberg, editor, Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, I: Foundations, World Scientific, 1997, pp. 163–246] could be recast, thus providing a valid alternative to the High-Level Replacement Systems paradigm [H. Ehrig, A. Habel, H.-J. Kreowski and F. Parisi-Presicce, Parallelism and concurrency in highlevel replacement systems, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 1 (1991) 361–404].In this paper we consider the category of term graphs, and we prove that it (partly) fits in the general framework for adhesive categories, developed in [S. Lack, and P. Sobociński, Adhesive categories, in: I. Walukiewicz, editor, Foundations of Software Science and Computation Structures, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. 2987 (2004), pp. 273–288, P. Sobociński, “Deriving bisimulation congruences from reduction systems”, Ph.D. thesis, BRICS, Department of Computer Science, University of Aaurhus (2004)], extended in [H. Ehrig, A. Habel, J. Padberg and U. Prange, Adhesive high-level replacement categories and systems, in: G. Engels and F. Parisi-Presicce, editors, Graph Transformation, Lect. Notes in Comp. Sci. (2004)] and applied to reduction systems in [V. Sassone, and P. Sobociński, Congruences for contextual graph-rewriting, Technical Report RS-04-11, BRICS, Department of Computer Science, University of Aarhus (2004)]. The main technical achievement concerns the proof that the category of term graphs is actually quasi-adhesive, obtained by proving the existence of suitable Van Kampen squares.     

Term rewriting and beyond — theorem proving in Isabelle

The subject of this paper is theorem proving based on rewriting and induction. Both principles are implemented as tactics within the generic theorem prover Isabelle. Isabelle's higher-order features enable us to go beyond first-order rewriting and express rewriting with conditionals, induction schemata, higher-order functions and program transformers. Applications include the verification and transformation of functional versions of insertion sort and quicksort.     

Lifting Infinite Normal Form Definitions From Term Rewriting to Term Graph Rewriting

nfinite normal forms are a way of giving semantics to non-terminating rewrite systems. The notion is a generalization of the Böhm tree in the lambda calculus. It was first introduced in [Ariola, Z. M. and S. Blom, Cyclic lambda calculi, in: Abadi and Ito [Abadi, M. and T. Ito, editors, “Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1281, Springer Verlag, 1997], pp. 77–106] to provide semantics for a lambda calculus on terms with letrec. In that paper infinite normal forms were defined directly on the graph rewrite system. In [Blom, S., “Term Graph Rewriting - syntax and semantics,” Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2001)] the framework was improved by defining the infinite normal form of a term graph using the infinite normal form on terms. This approach of lifting the definition makes the non-confluence problems introduced into term graph rewriting by substitution rules much easier to deal with. In this paper, we give a simplified presentation of the latter approach.     

Nonterminating Rewritings with Head Boundedness

We define here the concept of head boundedness,head normal form and head confluence of term rewriting systems that allow infinite derivation.Head confluence iw weaker than confluence,but sufficient to guarantee the correctness of lazy implementations of equational logic programming languages.Then we prove several results.First,if a left-linear system is locally confluent and head-bounded.then it is head-confluent.Second,head-confluent and head-bounded systems have the heau Church-Rosser property.Last,if an orthogonal system is head-terminating,then it is head-bounded.These results can be applied to generalize equational logic programming languages.