AT2-antagonist sensitive potentiation of angiotensin II-induced vasoconstrictions by blockade of nitric oxide synthesis in rat renal vasculature

1. Although the actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) on renal haemodynamics appear to be mediated by activation of the AT1 receptor subtype, AT2 binding sites have also been evidenced in the adult kidney vasculature. As NO is known to mask part of the renal effects of vasoconstrictor drugs, we queried whether the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions could occur via multiple receptor subtypes during inhibition of NO synthesis. We explored the effect of AT1 and AT2 receptor (AT-R) antagonists on Ang II-induced pressure increases during NO synthase or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibition in rat isolated kidneys perfused in the presence of indomethacin at constant flow in a single-pass circuit. 2. In the absence of NO blockade, the AT1-R antagonist L-158809 (500 nM) antagonized the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions, while the AT2-R antagonist PD-123319 (500 nM) had no effect. 3. Perfusing kidneys in the presence of either NO synthase inhibitors, L-NAME (100 microM) or L-NOARG (1 mM), or soluble guanylyl cyclase inhibitor, LY-83583 (10 microM), significantly increased both molar pD2 (from 9.40+/-0.25 to 10.36+/-0.11) and Emax values (from 24.9+/-3.1 to 79.9+/-4.9 mmHg) of the concentration-response curve for Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 4. In the presence of L-NAME, 500 nM L158809 abolished the Ang II-induced vasoconstrictions whatever the concentration tested. On the other hand, 500 nM PD-123319 reversed the left shift of the concentration-response curve for Ang II (molar pD2 value 9.72+/-0.13) leaving Emax value unaffected (91.3+/-7.6 mmHg). 5. In the presence of L-NAME, the potentiated vasoconstriction induced by 0.1 nM and the augmented vasoconstriction induced by 10 nM Ang II were fully inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by L-158809 (0.05-500 nM). By contrast, PD-123319 (0.5-500 nM) did not affect the 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and concentration-dependently decreased the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction plateauing at 65% inhibition above 5 nM antagonist. 6. Similar to PD-123319, during NO blockade the AT2-R antagonist CGP-42112A at 5 nM decreased by 50% the 0.1 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction and at 500 nM had no effect on 10 nM Ang II-induced vasoconstriction. 7. In conclusion, the renal Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, which is antagonized only by AT1-R antagonist in the presence of endogenous NO, becomes sensitive to both AT1- and AT2-R antagonists during NO synthesis inhibition. While AT1-R antagonist inhibited both L-NAME-potentiated and -augmented components of Ang II-induced vasoconstriction, AT2-R antagonists inhibited only the L-NAME-potentiated component.     

The nature of the spondylolytic defect. Demonstration of a communicating synovial pseudarthrosis in the pars interarticularis

The in vitro effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) in human vessels are not well studied. The development of specific Ang II-receptor antagonists has made it possible to delineate more carefully the receptor mechanisms involved. The objective of this study was twofold: to investigate the effect of Ang II on human coronary arteries and to study the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade with losartan. The setting was contractile experiments with ring segments of coronary arteries. We observed that Ang II is a vasoconstrictor of human coronary arteries, with a pEC50 value of 9.26 +/- 0.22 and Emax of 68.7 +/- 9.61% of potassium-induced contraction. Losartan (10-100 nM) shifted the concentration-response curve of Ang II to the right, with pEC50 values of 7.64 +/- 0.10 and 7.00 +/- 0.15, respectively (p = 0.001), demonstrating the antagonistic properties of losartan. We also noted a decreased maximal response to Ang II after incubation of losartan, with Emax of 51.1 +/- 7.08% and 41.9 +/- 4.70% (p = 0.05), respectively. In conclusion, this is the first report describing the contractile effect of Ang II and the antagonizing effects of losartan in isolated human coronary arteries.     

Communication with patients

The role of nitric oxide (NO) as a bronchodilator has been studied in humans with controversial results. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of endogenous NO on bronchial tone by studying whether nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition with NGnitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME) influences basal bronchial tone, or potentiates methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. In a preliminary experiment in five subjects, a significant reduction in exhaled NO was found after delivering L-NAME (15 mg in saline) (from 3.9 +/- 1.2 to 2.4 +/- 1.1 nmol min-1, P < 0.05). In nine healthy non-smokers, specific airway conductance (SGAW), as a measure of airway calibre, was recorded after delivering, in a double-blind, controlled vs. placebo fashion, both nebulized L-NAME and saline, at baseline and after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. There was no significant difference between the baseline SGAW values before and after delivering L-NAME (0.264 +/- 0.04 and 0.267 +/- 0.05 cm H2O-1 s-1, respectively). After pre-treatment with L-NAME, SGAW values during methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction were not different in comparison to values obtained after saline inhalation. It is concluded that decreased endogenous NO does not influence bronchial tone in healthy people, nor does it modify methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction.     

Mechanisms underlying the chronotropic effect of angiotensin II on cultured neurons from rat hypothalamus and brain stem

The chronotropic effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) was studied in cultured neurons from rat hypothalamus and brain stem with the use of the patch-clamp technique. Ang II (100 nM) increased the neuronal spontaneous firing rate from 0.8 +/- 0.3 (SE) Hz in control to 1.3 +/- 0.4 Hz (n = 7, P < 0.05). The amplitude of threshold stimulation was decreased by Ang II (100 nM) from 82 +/- 4 pA to 62 +/- 5 pA (n = 4, P < 0.05). These actions of Ang II were reversed by the angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist losartan (1 microM). In the presence of tetrodotoxin, Ang II (100 nM) significantly increased the frequency and the amplitude of the Cd2+-sensitive subthreshold activity of the cultured neurons. Ang II also stimulated the subthreshold early afterdepolarizations (EADs) to become fully developed action potentials. Similar to the action of Ang II, the protein kinase C (PKC) activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA, 100 nM) increased the firing rate from 0.76 +/- 0.3 Hz to 2.3 +/- 0.5 Hz (n = 6, P < 0.05) and increased the neuronal subthreshold activity. After neurons were intracellularly dialyzed with PKC inhibitory peptide (PKCIP, 5 microM), PMA alone, Ang II alone, or PMA plus Ang II no longer increased the action potential firing initiated from the resting membrane potential level. However, superfusion of PMA plus Ang II or Ang II alone increased the number of EADs that reached threshold and produced action potentials even in the presence of PKCIP (5 microM, n = 4). The actions of Ang II could also be mimicked by depolarizing pulse and K+ channel blockers (tetraethylammonium chloride or 4-aminopyridine). These results indicate that Ang II by activation of AT1 receptors increases neuronal excitability and firing frequency, and that this may involve both PKC dependent and -independent mechanisms.     

Germline mutations of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in a breast and ovarian cancer patient

Nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated as a modulator of the vascular effects of angiotensin II (ANG II) in the kidney. We used a NO-sensitive microelectrode to study the effect of ANG II on NO release, and to determine the effect of selective inhibition of the ANG II subtype I receptor (AT1) with losartan (LOS) and candesartan (CAN). NO release from isolated and perfused renal resistance arteries was measured with a porphyrin-electroplated, carbon fiber. The vessels were microdissected from isolated perfused rat kidneys and perfused at constant flow and pressure in vitro. The NO-electrode was placed inside the glass collection cannula to measure vessel effluent NO concentration. ANG II stimulated NO release in a dose-dependent fashion: 0.1 nM, 10 nM and 1000 nM ANG II increased NO-oxidation current by 85+/-18 pA (n = 11), 148+/-22 pA (n = 11), and 193+/-29 pA (n = 11), respectively. These currents correspond to changes in effluent NO concentration of 3.4+/-0.5 nM, 6.1+/-1.1 nM, and 8.2+/-1.3 nM, respectively. Neither LOS (1 muM) nor CAN (1 nM) significantly affected basal NO production, but both AT1-receptor blockers markedly blunted NO release in response to ANG II (10 nM): 77+/-6% inhibition with LOS (n = 8) and 63+/-9% with CAN (n = 8). These results are the first to demonstrate that ANG II stimulates NO release in isolated renal resistance arteries, and that ANG II-induced NO release is blunted by simultaneous AT1-receptor blockade. Our findings suggest that endothelium-dependent modulation of ANG II-induced vasoconstriction in renal resistance arteries is mediated, at least in part, by AT1-receptor-dependent NO release.     

Angiotensin II stimulates production of nitric oxide in guinea pig airways via AT1 receptor activation

Angiotensin II (Ang II) and nitric oxide (NO) regulate a variety of physiological functions. In this study, we suggest that inhaled Ang II produces an initial bronchodilation apparently by stimulating NO production via AT1 receptors. Also, we demonstrate that following the initial bronchodilation, Ang II causes bronchoconstriction in the guinea pig, also via AT1 receptors. Both of the findings are important for our understanding of airway functions induced by Ang II.     

Losartan but not verapamil inhibits angiotensin II-induced tissue endothelin-1 increase: role of blood pressure and endothelial function

Endothelin partially mediates angiotensin (Ang) II-induced vascular changes in vivo. This study investigated the effects of the angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonist losartan and the calcium channel blocker verapamil on vascular reactivity and tissue endothelin-1 levels in aortas of Wistar-Kyoto rats treated for 2 weeks with Ang II (200 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)). Ang II increased systolic blood pressure (39+/-4 mm Hg, P<0.05). Concomitant treatment with losartan abolished the Ang II-induced pressure increase (P<0.05), whereas verapamil reduced it only partially (P<0.05). In the aortas of rats with Ang II-induced hypertension, tissue endothelin-1 content was increased threefold and contractions to endothelin-1 were impaired (P<0.05). Interestingly, these alterations were normalized by losartan (P<0.05) but not by verapamil. Hence, there was a strong, negative correlation between contractions to endothelin-1 and tissue endothelin-1 content (r=-0.733, P<0.0001). In contrast, both antihypertensive drugs normalized impaired endothelium-dependent relaxations to acetylcholine and reduced the sensitivity of vascular smooth muscle to sodium nitroprusside compared with Ang II-treated rats (P<0.05). Ang II-induced hypertension enhanced endothelium-dependent contractions to acetylcholine, and these were normalized by either drug. In conclusion, these findings suggest that long-term treatment with Ang II modulates endothelin-1 protein expression in the rat aorta. Although both antihypertensive agents lowered blood pressure and normalized endothelial function, only losartan prevented the increase in tissue endothelin-1 content, suggesting that angiotensin type 1 receptor antagonists but not calcium antagonists modulate tissue endothelin-1 in vivo.     

Birthweight outcomes among Asian American and Pacific Islander subgroups in the United States

OBJECTIVES: The angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist, losartan (orally administered), decreases vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II (Ang II). Oral losartan is converted into the active metabolite, Exp3174, which causes most of the antagonistic effects. Effects of losartan as such have not been studied after its intra-arterial administration in humans. Therefore, we investigated the effects of both intra-arterially and orally administered losartan on AT1-receptor-mediated vasoconstriction. METHODS: Forearm vascular resistance (FVR) was determined by venous occlusion plethysmography in 24 healthy subjects. Ang II (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 ng/kg/min) was infused into the brachial artery, before and after losartan, administered intra-arterially (dose range 100-3000 ng/kg/min) or orally (50 mg once daily for 5 days). RESULTS: Ang II concentration-dependently increased FVR (P < 0.05); tachyphylaxis did not occur. Losartan alone did not change FVR. Intra-arterially infused losartan dose-dependently inhibited Ang-II-induced vasoconstriction. At a concentration of 10(-8) M Ang II, losartan reduced FVR, as a percentage of baseline values, from 287 +/- 30 to 33 +/- 8% (mean +/- s.e.m.; P < 0.05). Orally given losartan reduced FVR from 297 +/- 40 to 73 +/- 19% (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Losartan, intra-arterially administered, causes no effect on baseline vascular resistance, but markedly inhibits Ang-II-induced vasoconstriction in the human forearm vascular bed. Relatively high doses of intra-arterial losartan were required when compared to the antagonism by the orally administered drug. These data indicate that Ang-II-induced vasoconstriction is mediated by AT1-receptors, which are blocked by losartan. The more effective antagonism exerted by oral losartan is presumably explained by the formation of Exp3174. Endogenous Ang II does not contribute to baseline vascular tone in healthy, sodium-replete, subjects.     

Impaired sensorineural function after allergen-induced mediator release

We tested the hypothesis that allergen-induced mediator release augments the magnitude of isocapnic dry gas hyperpnea-induced bronchoconstriction in sensitized guinea pigs. Male Hartley guinea pigs were sensitized by spontaneous inhalation of ovalbumin (OA) aerosol on days 0 and 7 of the study. On day 14, sensitized animals again breathed OA aerosol and were prospectively divided into a group that exhibited labored breathing (LB), presumably reflecting OA-induced inflammatory mediator release, and a group that did not exhibit LB at this time. Control guinea pigs breathed saline aerosol on days 0, 7, and 14. Bronchoalveolar lavage on day 17 disclosed relative eosinophilia in OA+LB, but not in OA-LB, animals. On day 17, the bronchoconstrictor responses to increasing intravenous (i.v.) doses of acetylcholine (ACh), substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA), and capsaicin, as well as dry gas hyperpnea, were measured in vivo in animals from each group. Control and OA-LB guinea pigs exhibited similar responses, but OA+LB animals demonstrated augmented bronchoconstriction induced by i.v. administration of ACh, SP, or NKA. However, despite their augmented responsiveness to these exogenous constrictor agonists, OA+LB animals displayed no greater bronchoconstriction after dry gas hyperpnea or i.v. capsaicin administration. It is known that both dry gas hyperpnea and i.v. capsaicin cause bronchoconstriction in guinea pigs by releasing endogenous tachykinins from airway sensory C-fibers. Thus, our results suggest that allergen-induced mediator release impairs endogenous tachykinin release from airway sensory C-fibers in guinea pigs.     

Effects of prostaglandins and nitric oxide on the renal effects of angiotensin II in the anaesthetized rat

1. The potential influences of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins on the renal effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) have been investigated in the captopril-treated anaesthetized rat by examining the effect of indomethacin or the NO synthase inhibitor, N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), on the renal responses obtained during infusion of Ang II directly into the renal circulation. 2. Intrarenal artery (i.r.a.) infusion of Ang II (1-30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) elicited a dose-dependent decrease in renal vascular conductance (RVC; -38+/-3% at 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1); P < 0.01) and increase in filtration fraction (FF; +49+/-8%; P < 0.05) in the absence of any change in carotid mean arterial blood pressure (MBP). Urine output (Uv), absolute (UNaV) and fractional sodium excretion (FENa), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were unchanged during infusion of Ang II 1-30 ng kg(-1) min(-1) (+6+/-17%, +11+/-17%, +22+/-23%, and -5+/-9%, respectively, at 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)). At higher doses, Ang II (100 and 300 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) induced further decreases in RVC, but with associated increases in MBP, Uv and UNaV. 3. Pretreatment with indomethacin (10 mg kg(-1) i.v.) had no significant effect on basal renal function, or on the Ang II-induced reduction in RVC (-25+/-7% vs -38+/-3% at Ang II 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)). In the presence of indomethacin, Ang II tended to cause a dose-dependent decrease in GFR (-38+/-10% at 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)); however, this effect was not statistically significant (P=0.078) when evaluated over the dose range of 1-30 ng kg(-1) min(-1), and was not accompanied by any significant changes in Uv, UNaV or FENa (-21+/-12%, -18+/-16% and +36+/-38%, respectively). 4. Pretreatment with L-NAME (10 microg kg(-1) min(-1) i.v.) tended to reduce basal RVC (control -11.8+/-1.4, +L-NAME -7.9+/-1.8 ml min(-1) mmHg(-1) x 10(-2)), and significantly increased basal FF (control +15.9+/-0.8, +L-NAME +31.0+/-3.7%). In the presence of L-NAME, renal vasoconstrictor responses to Ang II were not significantly modified (-38+/-3% vs -35+/-13% at 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)), but Ang II now induced dose-dependent decreases in GFR, Uv and UNaV (-51+/-11%, -41+/-14% and -31+/-17%, respectively, at an infusion rate of Ang II, 30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)). When evaluated over the range of 1-30 ng kg(-1) min(-1), the effect of Ang II on GFR and Uv were statistically significant (P < 0.05), but on UNaV did not quite achieve statistical significance (P=0.066). However, there was no associated change in FENa observed, suggesting a non-tubular site of interaction between Ang II and NO. 5. In contrast to its effects after pretreatment with L-NAME alone, Ang II (1-30 ng kg(-1) min(-1)) failed to reduce renal vascular conductance in rats pretreated with the combination of L-NAME and the selective angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist, GR117289 (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.). This suggests that the renal vascular effects of Ang II are mediated through AT1 receptors. Over the same dose range, Ang II also failed to significantly reduce GFR or Uv. 6. In conclusion, the renal haemodynamic effects of Ang II in the rat kidney appear to be modulated by cyclooxygenase-derived prostaglandins and NO. The precise site(s) of such an interaction cannot be determined from the present data, but the data suggest complex interactions at the level of the glomerulus.     

Autosomal dominant hypertension and brachydactyly in a Turkish kindred resembles essential hypertension

1. The aim of this study was to investigate, by use of spectral analysis, (1) the blood pressure (BP) variability changes in the conscious rat during blockade of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis by the L-arginine analogue NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME); (2) the involvement of the renin-angiotensin system in these modifications, by use of the angiotensin II AT1-receptor antagonist losartan. 2. Blockade of NO synthesis was achieved by infusion for 1 h of a low-dose (10 micrograms kg-1 min-1, i.v., n = 10) and high-dose (100 micrograms kg-1 min-1, i.v., n = 10) of L-NAME. The same treatment was applied in two further groups (2 x n = 10) after a bolus dose of losartan (10 mg kg-1, i.v.). 3. Thirty minutes after the start of the infusion of low-dose L-NAME, systolic BP (SBP) increased (+10 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.01), with the effect being more pronounced 5 min after the end of L-NAME administration (+20 +/- 4 mmHg, P < 0.001). With high-dose L-NAME, SBP increased immediately (5 min: +8 +/- 2 mmHg, P < 0.05) and reached a maximum after 40 min (+53 +/- 4 mmHg, P < 0.001); a bradycardia was observed (60 min: -44 +/- 13 beats min-1, P < 0.01). 4. Low-dose L-NAME increased the low-frequency component (LF: 0.02-0.2 Hz) of SBP variability (50 min: 6.7 +/- 1.7 mmHg2 vs 3.4 +/- 0.5 mmHg2, P < 0.05), whereas the high dose of L-NAME not only increased the LF component (40 min: 11.7 +/- 2 mmHg2 vs 2.7 +/- 0.5 mmHg2, P < 0.001) but also decreased the mind frequency (MF: 0.2-0.6 Hz) component (60 min: 1.14 +/- 0.3 mmHg2 vs 1.7 +/- 0.1 mmHg2, P < 0.05) of SBP. 5. Losartan did not modify BP levels but had a tachycardic effect (+45 beats min-1). Moreover, losartan increased MF oscillations of SBP (4.26 +/- 0.49 mmHg2 vs 2.43 +/- 0.25 mmHg2, P < 0.001), prevented the BP rise provoked by the low-dose of L-NAME and delayed the BP rise provoked by the high-dose of L-NAME. Losartan also prevented the amplification of the LF oscillations of SBP induced by L-NAME; the decrease of the MF oscillations of SBP induced by L-NAME was reinforced after losartan. 6. We conclude that the renin-angiotensin system is involved in the increase in variability of SBP in the LF range which resulted from the withdrawal of the vasodilating influence of NO. We propose that NO may counterbalance LF oscillations provoked by the activity of the renin-angiotensin system.     

Video-microscopic assessment of the role of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme in the control of the renal microcirculation

In the present study, we assessed the role of tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme as a determinant of intrarenal hemodynamics by using the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor trandolaprilat and the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan. Afferent and efferent arteriolar diameters were measured with computer-assisted vessel imaging in isolated perfused hydronephrotic rat kidneys. In response to the addition of 1.0 nM angiotensin I, afferent arterioles constricted by 27.3 +/- 2.4% and efferent arterioles by 20.9 +/- 2.4%. These constrictions were similar to those observed after the administration of 0.3 nM angiotensin 11 (33.7 +/- 2.3% and 20.9 +/- 2.4% in afferent and efferent arterioles, respectively). Pretreatment with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor trandolaprilat (0.1-10 microM) blunted the angiotensin I-induced constriction of afferent arterioles (12.7 +/- 1.4%) and completely abolished the angiotensin I-induced constriction of efferent arterioles. Subsequent addition of angiotensin II to the perfusate resulted in a marked decrease of afferent (39.9 +/- 1.8%) and efferent (27.8 +/- 3.3%) arteriolar diameters. Pretreatment with the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan completely blocked the angiotensin I-induced constriction of both afferent and efferent arterioles. Collectively, these data suggest that angiotensin I affects renal microvessels through its conversion to angiotensin II, mediated by locally available tissue angiotensin-converting enzyme, which subserves the local control of the renal microcirculation.     

Losartan blocks aldosterone and renal vascular responses to angiotensin II in humans

In vitro and animal studies have demonstrated that the effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) on aldosterone is mediated through the Ang II type 1 receptor. However, it has been difficult to demonstrate an effect of Ang II type 1 receptor blockade on aldosterone levels in human studies. One possible explanation is that subjects have not been studied under salt-controlled conditions. Therefore, we examined the effects of losartan on the aldosterone and renal plasma flow responses to Ang II infusion in six normotensive subjects under low and high salt conditions. Ang II was infused in graded doses (0.3 to 10 ng/kg per minute) in the presence and absence of losartan (a single 50-mg oral dose). Renal plasma flow was assessed by measurement of para-aminohippurate clearance. Blood pressure, plasma aldosterone levels (low salt conditions only), and para-aminohippurate clearance were measured before and after each Ang II dose. Losartan had no effect on baseline systolic pressure but attenuated the systolic pressure response to exogenous Ang II during both low salt (0.7 +/- 1.9 versus 6.7 +/- 1.4 mm Hg, P = .001) and high salt (2.0 +/- 1.9 versus 12.3 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, P = .006) conditions. Under low salt conditions, losartan reduced the baseline plasma aldosterone level from 1135 +/- 204 to 558 +/- 102 pmol/L (P = .015) and blocked the aldosterone response to Ang II (-49 +/- 110 versus +436 +/- 83 pmol/L, P = .019). During high salt conditions, losartan had no effect on baseline renal plasma flow but attenuated the renal plasma flow response to Ang II (-90.1 +/- 15.1 versus -185.1 +/- 2.6 mL/min per 1.73 m2, P = .013). These data confirm that losartan lowers both basal and exogenous Ang II-stimulated aldosterone levels under low salt conditions. Losartan does not significantly affect baseline renal plasma flow but does attenuate the renal plasma flow response to exogenous Ang II under high salt conditions.     

The angiotensin receptor antagonist 2-ethoxy-1-[[2'-(1H- tetrazol-5-yl) biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]-1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxylic acid (CV11974) attenuates the tubuloglomerular feedback response during NO synthase blockade in rats

Nitric oxide (NO) produced in the juxtaglomerular apparatus may regulate the tubuloglomerular feedback (TGF) response. The inhibition of intrinsic NO results in significant renal hemodynamic changes, a phenomenon similar to that observed after angiotensin II (A-II) administration. We measured stop-flow pressure (Psf) during loop perfusion with artificial tubular fluid in Sprague-Dawley rats to establish whether alterations in TGF responsiveness during NO inhibition depend on the action of endogenous A-II. The NO synthase blocker N omega-nitro-L-arginine-methyl-ester (L-NAME: 10 mg/kg i.v.) significant increased TGF responsiveness, defined as the change in Psf on increasing loop flow from 0 to 40 nl/min compared with control (delta Psf: -21.3 +/- 2.6 vs. -9.7 +/- 0.6 mm Hg, P < .001). After concomitant treatment with the nonpeptide A-II type 1 receptor antagonist 2-ethoxy-1-[[2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) biphenyl-4-yl]methyl]-1H-benzimidazole-7-carboxic acid (CV11974: 1 mg/kg i.v.) and L-NAME, the TGF response was attenuated significantly (delta Psf: -7.6 +/- 1.9 mm Hg, P < .001). On the other hand, Psf in the absence of loop perfusion was increased similarly by L-NAME treatment in the presence (53.7 +/- 2.2 mm Hg) or absence of CV11974 (Psf 50.7 +/- 3.2 mm Hg). These results suggest that augmentation of the TGF response by endogenous NO inhibition depends, at least in part, on the intrinsic A-II activity.     

Vasodepressor actions of angiotensin-(1-7) unmasked during combined treatment with lisinopril and losartan

Blockade of angiotensin II (Ang II) function during 8 days of oral therapy with lisinopril (20 mg/kg) and losartan (10 mg/kg) normalized the arterial pressure (112+/-3/70+/-3 mm Hg) and raised the plasma concentrations of the vasodilator peptide angiotensin-(1-7) [Ang-(1-7)] of 21 male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Treated animals were then given a 15-minute infusion of either mouse immunoglobulin G1 or a specific monoclonal Ang-(1-7) antibody while their blood pressure and heart rate were recorded continuously in the awake state. The concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) in arterial blood were determined by radioimmunoassay. Infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody caused significant elevations in mean arterial pressure that were sustained for the duration of the infusion and were accompanied by transient bradycardia. Although the hemodynamic effects produced by infusion of the Ang-(1-7) antibody had no effect on plasma levels of Ang II, they caused a twofold rise in the plasma concentrations of Ang-(1-7). A pressor response of similar magnitude and characteristics was obtained in a separate group of SHR treated with the combination of lisinopril and losartan for 8 days during an infusion of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II. The pressor response induced by the administration of this competitive, non-subtype-selective Ang II receptor blocker was not modified by pretreatment of the rats with an angiotensin type-2 (AT2) receptor blocker (PD123319). Plasma concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1-7) were not changed by the administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II either in the absence or in the presence of PD123319 pretreatment. These results are the first to indicate an important contribution of Ang-(1-7) in mediating the vasodilator effects caused by combined inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme and AT1 receptors. The comparable results obtained by administration of [Sar1-Thr8]Ang II suggest that the vasodepressor effects of Ang-(1-7) during the combined treatment is modulated by a non-AT1/AT2 angiotensin subtype receptor.     

Nitric oxide derived from sympathetic nerves regulates airway responsiveness to histamine in guinea pigs

Nitric oxide (NO), which can be derived from the nervous system or the epithelium of the airway, may modulate airway responsiveness. We investigated how NO derived from the airway nervous system would affect the airway responsiveness to histamine and acetylcholine in mechanically ventilated guinea pigs. An NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (1 mmol/kg i.p.) significantly enhanced airway responsiveness to histamine but not to acetylcholine. Its enantiomer D-NAME (1 mmol/kg i.p.), in contrast, had no effect. The L-NAME-induced airway hyperresponsiveness was still observed in animals pretreated with propranolol (1 mg/kg i.v.) and atropine (1 mg/kg i.v.). Pretreatment with the ganglionic blocker hexamethonium (2 mg/kg i.v.) completely abolished enhancing effect of L-NAME on airway responsiveness. Bilateral cervical vagotomy did not alter the L-NAME-induced airway hyperresponsiveness, whereas sympathetic stellatectomy completely abolished it. Results suggest that NO that was presumably derived from the sympathetic nervous system regulates airway responsiveness to histamine in guinea pigs.     

A prospective study of omeprazole suspension to prevent clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from stress ulcers in mechanically ventilated trauma patients

We recently reported that administration of Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), an inhibitor of nitric oxide (NO) production, activates the vascular and cardiac renin-angiotensin systems and causes vascular thickening and myocardial hypertrophy in rats with perivascular and myocardial fibrosis. It has been reported that aldosterone may contribute to the development of cardiac fibrosis, but it is not known whether inhibition of NO synthesis affects angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor gene expression and aldosterone secretion. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of NO inhibition on the expression of Ang II receptors in the adrenal gland and on aldosterone secretion in rats. Wistar King A rats received normal water, L-NAME alone (1 mg/mL in the drinking water), or L-NAME and the alpha1-adrenergic receptor blocker bunazosin (0.1 mg/mL in the drinking water) for 1 week. After 1 week of treatment with L-NAME, systolic blood pressure, plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC), and mRNA level and number of Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1-R) were increased. Plasma renin activity, serum angiotensin-converting enzyme activity, and the number of AT2-R were unchanged. Although addition of bunazosin to L-NAME restored systolic blood pressure to the control level, PAC and AT1-R numbers remained significantly higher than those of control level. These results suggest that the increased AT1-R number and PAC induced by the inhibition of NO synthesis were independent of blood pressure and systemic renin-angiotensin system. Therefore, hypertension and myocardial fibrosis induced by NO blockade may be due in part to an elevation of PAC caused by increased AT1-R in the adrenal gland.     

Evidence that angiotensin II, endothelins and nitric oxide regulate mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in rat aorta

We measured the activity of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, enzymes believed to be involved in the pathway for cell proliferation, in rat aortic strips with or without endothelium, and examined effects of angiotensin receptor antagonists, endothelin receptor antagonists and nitric oxide (NO)-related agents. Endothelium removal produced an activation of MAP kinase activity in the strips, whereas the enzyme activity was not affected in the adventitia. The MAP kinase activation was inhibited by either the angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonist losartan or the endothelin ETA receptor antagonist BQ 123. The combination of both antagonists caused an additive inhibition. The angiotensin AT2 receptor antagonist PD 123,319 and the endothelin ETB receptor antagonist BQ 788 did not affect the MAP kinase activation. The NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) caused an activation of MAP kinase in the endothelium-intact aorta and the MAP kinase activation was inhibited by losartan or BQ123. The NO releaser nitroprusside inhibited the MAP kinase activation induced by endothelium removal or angiotensin II. These results suggest that even in isolated arteries, NO of endothelial origin tonically exert MAP kinase-inhibiting effects and endogenous angiotensin II and endothelins in the media are tonically released to cause MAP kinase-stimulating effects in medial smooth muscle.