Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. Recent studies have shown that coronary stenting significantly reduces restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty alone. However, limited information is available on the effect of coronary stenting in diabetic patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We designed this study to analyze the effect of diabetes on restenosis in patients treated with either balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting who were enrolled in a 6-month angiographic follow-up program. Three hundred consecutive patients, 19% of whom were diabetics, who underwent coronary stent implantation during a single-vessel procedure on native coronary vessels and who had 6-month angiographic follow-up constituted the study group (stent group). Three hundred consecutive patients who underwent 6-month angiographic follow-up after single-vessel conventional balloon angioplasty served as control patients (balloon group). Preprocedural, postprocedural, and follow-up angiograms were analyzed with quantitative angiography. In the balloon group, the restenosis rate was almost twofold higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (63% versus 36%; P=.0002) owing to both a greater late loss (0.79+/-0.70 versus 0.41+/-0.61 mm, respectively; P<.0001) and a higher rate of late vessel occlusion (14% versus 3%, respectively; P<.001). In the stent group, restenosis rates were similar in diabetics and nondiabetics (25% versus 27%, respectively). Furthermore, in the stent group, late loss (0.77+/-0.65 versus 0.79+/-0.57 mm, respectively) and the rate of late vessel occlusion (2% versus 1%, respectively) did not differ significantly between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although diabetics have increased rates of restenosis and late vessel occlusion after simple balloon angioplasty, they have the same improved outcome with coronary stenting that has been documented in nondiabetic patients.     

Optimal coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus primary stent (OCBAS): immediate and long-term follow-up results

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare two strategies of revascularization in patients obtaining a good immediate angiographic result after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA): elective stenting versus optimal PTCA. A good immediate angiographic result with provisional stenting was considered to occur only if early loss in minimal luminal diameter (MLD) was documented at 30 min post-PTCA angiography. BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting reduces restenosis in lesions exhibiting early deterioration (>0.3 mm) in MLD within the first 24 hours (early loss) after successful PTCA. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. METHODS: To compare angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization (TVR) of lesions treated with coronary stenting versus those treated with optimal PTCA, 116 patients were randomized to stent (n=57) or to optimal PTCA (n=59). After randomization in the PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). RESULTS: Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study: 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; p < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA group (0.63+/-0.59 vs. 0.26+/-0.44, respectively; p=0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32< or =0.3 vs. 1.24+/-0.29 mm for the stent and the PTCA groups, respectively; p=NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; p=NS) and TVR (17.5% in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; p=NS) were similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (p=NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US $591,740 in the stent versus US $398,480 in the PTCA group (p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs had similar restenosis rate and TVR, but lower cost than primary stenting after PTCA.     

Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary stenting reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty in patients with new coronary lesions. We conducted a prospective, randomized, multicenter study to determine whether intracoronary stenting, as compared with standard balloon angioplasty, reduces the recurrence of luminal narrowing in restenotic lesions. METHODS: A total of 383 patients who had undergone at least one balloon angioplasty and who had clinical and angiographic evidence of restenosis after the procedure were randomly assigned to undergo standard balloon angioplasty (192 patients) or intracoronary stenting with a Palmaz-Schatz stent (191 patients). The primary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis (defined as stenosis of more than 50 percent of the luminal diameter) at six months. The secondary end points were death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and revascularization of the target vessel. RESULTS: The rate of restenosis was significantly higher in the angioplasty group than in the stent group (32 percent as compared with 18 percent, P= 0.03). Revascularization of the target vessel at six months was required in 27 percent of the angioplasty group but in only 10 percent of the stent group (P=0.001). This difference resulted from a smaller mean (+/-SD) minimal luminal diameter in the angioplasty group (1.85+/-0.56 mm) than in the stent group (2.04+/-0.66 mm), with a mean difference of 0.19 mm (P=0.01) at follow-up. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 0.6 percent of the angioplasty group and in 3.9 percent of the stent group. The rate of event-free survival at 250 days was 72 percent in the angioplasty group and 84 percent in the stent group (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Elective coronary stenting was effective in the treatment of restenosis after balloon angioplasty. Stenting resulted in a lower rate of recurrent stenosis despite a higher incidence of subacute thrombosis.     

A clinical trial comparing primary stenting of the infarct-related artery with optimal primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: results from the Florence Randomized Elective Stenting in Acute Coronary Occlusions (FRESCO) trial

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare stenting of the primary infarct-related artery (IRA) with optimal primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with respect to clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with an acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: Early and late restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA after successful primary PTCA significantly contributes to increased patient morbidity and mortality. Coronary stenting results in a lower rate of angiographic and clinical restenosis than standard PTCA in patients with angina and with previously untreated, noncomplex lesions. METHODS: After successful primary PTCA, 150 patients were randomly assigned to elective stenting or no further intervention. The primary end point of the trial was a composite end point, defined as death, reinfarction or repeat target vessel revascularization as a consequence of recurrent ischemia within 6 months of randomization. The secondary end point was angiographic evidence of restenosis or reocclusion at 6 months after randomization. RESULTS: Stenting of the IRA was successful in all patients randomized to stent treatment. At 6 months, the incidence of the primary end point was 9% in the stent group and 28% in the PTCA group (p=0.003); the incidence of restenosis or reocclusion was 17% in the stent group and 43% in the PTCA group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Primary stenting of the IRA, compared with optimal primary angioplasty, results in a lower rate of major adverse events related to recurrent ischemia and a lower rate of angiographically detected restenosis or reocclusion of the IRA.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Evaluating the potential cost-effectiveness of stenting as a treatment for symptomatic single-vessel coronary disease. Use of a decision-analytic model

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting appears to provide more predictable immediate results and lower rates of restenosis than conventional balloon angioplasty for selected lesion types, but its hospital costs are significantly higher. This study was designed to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stenting relative to conventional balloon angioplasty for the treatment of patients with symptomatic, single-vessel coronary disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed a decision-analytic model to predict quality-adjusted life expectancy and lifetime treatment costs for patients with symptomatic, single-vessel coronary disease treated by either Palmaz-Schatz stenting (PSS) or conventional angioplasty (PTCA). Estimates of the probabilities of overall procedural success (PTCA, 97%; PSS, 98%), abrupt closure requiring emergency bypass surgery (PTCA, 1.0%; PSS, 0.6%), and angiographic restenosis (PTCA, 37%; PSS, 20%) were derived from review of the literature published as of September 1993. Procedural costs were based on the true economic (ie, variable) costs of each procedure at Boston's Beth Israel Hospital. On the basis of these data, coronary stenting was estimated to result in a higher quality-adjusted life expectancy than conventional angioplasty but to incur additional costs as well. Compared with conventional angioplasty, stenting had an estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $23,600 per quality-adjusted life year gained. Although the cost-effectiveness ratio for stenting changed with variations in assumptions about the relative costs and restenosis rates, it remained less than $40,000 per quality-adjusted year of life gained--and thus was similar to many other accepted medical treatments--unless the stent angiographic restenosis rate was > 23%, the angioplasty restenosis rate was < 34%, or the cost of stenting (including vascular complications) exceeded that of conventional angioplasty by more than $3000. The alternative strategy of secondary stenting (initial angioplasty followed by stenting only for symptomatic restenosis) was estimated to be both less effective and less cost-effective than primary stenting over a wide range of plausible assumptions and thus does not appear to be cost-effective when primary stenting is also an option. CONCLUSIONS: Decision-analytic modeling can be used to evaluate the potential cost-effectiveness of new coronary interventions. Our analysis suggests that despite its higher cost, elective coronary stenting may be a reasonably cost-effective treatment for selected patients with single-vessel coronary disease. Primary stenting is unlikely to be cost-effective for lesions with a low probability of restenosis (eg, < 30%) or for patients for whom the cost of stenting is expected to be much higher than usual (eg, because of a high risk of vascular complications). Given the sensitivity of the cost-effectiveness ratios to even modest variations in the relative restenosis rates and cost estimates, future studies will be necessary to determine more precisely the cost-effectiveness of coronary stenting for specific patient and lesion subsets.     

Primary stenting of de novo lesions in small coronary arteries: a prospective, pilot study

Technical advancement and new anti-thrombotic regimens have recently shown so much improvement in the results of coronary stenting that the conventional contra-indication for stenting in small coronary arteries (<3 mm) needs to be revised. We undertook a prospective pilot study of elective Palmaz-Schatz stenting in de novo lesions located in coronary arteries of less than 3 mm diameter. Fifty consecutive patients (63 +/- 9 years) with stable (n = 38) and unstable angina (n = 12) were included. Philips-DCI quantitative coronary analysis was used to measure reference diameter, minimal lumen diameter and percent diameter stenosis before PTCA, after stenting and at 6-month angiographic follow-up study. All measurements were performed after intracoronary injection of nitroglycerin (300 microg). All patients received ticlopidine (250 mg/day) and aspirin (100 mg/day). The mean lesion length was 9 +/- 3 mm. The balloon size used for stent delivery was 2.75 mm in 30 patients and 2.5 mm in 20 patients and the mean balloon inflation pressure used for stent deployment was 12 +/- 2 atm. All stents were deployed successfully. In-hospital complications occurred in two patients, diagonal branch occlusion at day 2 requiring emergency PTCA in one and a hematoma at the femoral puncture site requiring surgery in the other. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate remained 2% (nonfatal infarct in one). Follow-up angiography (n = 46, 92%) at 6 +/- 3 months showed a 30% restenosis rate. Target vessel revascularization (TVR) rate was 13%. We conclude that elective stenting in small coronary arteries is feasible and involves an acceptable risk of restenosis.     

Immediate and long-term effect of balloon angioplasty or stent implantation on the absolute and relative coronary blood flow velocity reserve

BACKGROUND: There is controversy regarding the immediate and long-term effects of PTCA on the coronary flow reserve. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with 1-vessel disease and normal left ventricular function were studied after balloon angioplasty (n=34) or stent implantation (n=20). Distal coronary blood flow velocity reserve (CFR) was defined as the ratio of adenosine-induced hyperemic versus baseline blood flow velocity with a 0.014-in Doppler guidewire. The relative CFR was defined as the ratio of the distal CFR and the reference CFR measured in the normal adjacent coronary artery. Hemodynamic and angiographic measurements were performed before and directly after balloon angioplasty or stent implantation and at 6-month follow-up. CFR after PTCA 相似文献   

The feasibility of intracarotid adenosine for the manipulation of human cerebrovascular resistance

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting (CS) in a consecutive series of patients. BACKGROUND: Although stenting in highly selected patient groups reduces restenosis, the results of stenting in a heterogeneous patient group and the effects of clinical and procedural factors on stent restenosis are currently unclear. METHODS: We analyzed the 6-month angiographic outcome of 500 lesions in 463 consecutive patients undergoing successful CS. Clinical, qualitative and quantitative angiographic variables were correlated with restenosis assessed as both a binary and a continuous variable. RESULTS: Restenosis, defined as the presence of >50% diameter stenosis in the dilated segment, was present in 105 (26%) of the 405 lesions with angiographic follow-up. The mean late lumen loss during the follow-up period was 0.79+/-0.64 mm. Implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.0001) and a high acute gain (p < 0.0002) were independently associated with a higher late lumen loss. In contrast, the use of high inflation pressure (p < 0.02) and Palmaz-Schatz stents (p < 0.005) was independently associated with a lower late lumen loss. When restenosis was defined as a qualitative variable, implantation of multiple stents (p < 0.001), stenosis length (p < 0.01), small reference diameter (p < 0.02) and stent type other than Palmaz-Schatz (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of restenosis. None of the clinical variables tested was associated with restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting in an unselected patient group is associated with an acceptable restenosis rate. Although some risk factors were identified, the risk of restenosis was not related to most of the variables tested. This suggests that the superiority of CS over balloon angioplasty, in terms of restenosis, might also apply to subgroups of patients that were not included in the recent randomized studies.     

Are directional coronary atherectomy and Palmaz-Schatz stent more efficacious than conventional balloon angioplasty for treating de novo coronary artery lesions?

It is unclear whether new devices such as directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) or Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation improve long-term outcomes compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in patients with stable angina and de novo coronary artery lesions of type A or type B except for complete occlusive lesions investigated by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A total of 146 patients with stable angina and simple lesions were assigned to either conventional balloon angioplasty (62 patients), DCA (50 patients), or Palmaz-Schatz implantation (34 patients). The acute results and late outcomes were assessed by coronary angiography. The results of the three procedures were similar with respect to procedural success and complications. Patients who underwent stenting or DCA had a larger immediate increase in the diameter of the lumen and a larger luminal diameter immediately after the procedure than those who underwent balloon angioplasty. At six months follow-up, the patients treated by stenting continued to have a larger luminal diameter and a lower rate of restenosis than those treated with balloon angioplasty (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.85 +/- 0.83 mm, p < 0.005; 5.9% vs 29%, p < 0.05) and DCA (2.30 +/- 0.66 vs 1.90 +/- 0.96 mm, p < 0.05; 5.9% vs 24%, NS). The patients treated with balloon angioplasty had a smaller late loss than those treated with DCA or Palmaz-Schatz stent. The patients treated with DCA had a larger loss index than those treated with balloon angioplasty or Palmaz-Schatz stent. Stenting was a significant factor in decreasing the rate of restenosis by logistic regression analysis, compared with balloon angioplasty. The angiographic outcomes were better in patients who received a stent than in those who received other treatments. This study suggests that even lesions stable for treatment by balloon angioplasty and DCA can also be treated with Palmaz-Schatz stents.     

Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II)

BACKGROUND: The multicentre, randomised Benestent-II study investigated a strategy of implantation of a heparin-coated Palmar-Schatz stent plus antiplatelet drugs compared with the use of balloon angioplasty in selected patients with stable or stabilised unstable angina, with one or more de-novo lesions, less than 18 mm long, in vessels of diameter 3 mm or more. METHODS: 827 patients were randomly assigned stent implantation (414 patients) or standard balloon angioplasty (413 patients). The primary clinical endpoint was event-free survival at 6 months, including death, myocardial infarction, and the need for revascularisation. The secondary endpoints were the restenosis rate at 6 months and the cost-effectiveness at 12 months. There was also one-to-one subrandomisation to either clinical and angiographic follow-up or clinical follow-up alone. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Four patients (one stent group, three angioplasty group) were excluded from analysis since no lesion was found. At 6 months, a primary clinical endpoint had occurred in 53 (12.8%) of 413 patients in the stent group and 79 (19.3%) of 410 in the angioplasty group (p=0.013). This significant difference in clinical outcome was maintained at 12 months. In the subgroup assigned angiographic follow-up, the mean minimum lumen diameter was greater in the stent group than in the balloon-angioplasty group, (1.89 [SD 0.65] vs 1.66 [0.57] mm, p=0.0002), which corresponds to restenosis rates (diameter stenosis > or =50%) of 16% and 31% (p=0.0008). In the group assigned clinical follow-up alone, event-free survival rate at 12 months was higher in the stent group than the balloon-angioplasty group (0.89 vs 0.79, p=0.004) at a cost of an additional 2085 Dutch guilders (US$1020) per patient. INTERPRETATION: Over 12-month follow-up, a strategy of elective stenting with heparin-coated stents is more effective but also more costly than balloon angioplasty.     

Stenting for ischemic heart disease

This article examines current indications to intracoronary stenting for percutaneous cardiac revascularization. The data sources are a review of the published English literature, with focus on clinical and randomized trails of coronary artery stenting. Stents reduce the need for emergency bypass surgery in the setting of acute or threatened vessel closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In selected cases, when deployed electively in large native vessels with focal stenosis, clinical and angiographic recurrence are significantly reduced. Preliminary studies have also suggested a potential role in the treatment of saphenous vein graft lesions and restenotic lesions, and in improving on suboptimal results in lesions refractory to balloon dilatation. To prevent stent thrombosis, adjunctive antiplatelet therapy has been shown to be more efficacious than anticoagulation, and optimal stent apposition to the vessel wall appears to be critical. A recent exponential increase in the use of coronary stents has revolutionized the contemporary practice of interventional cardiology. Although technical factors and feasibility have been well refined and shown, evidence-based practice is lacking for many patient subsets.     

Acute angiographic and clinical results of long balloon percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and adjuvant stenting for long narrowings

Historically, long coronary artery stenoses undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) are reported to have reduced procedural and clinical success in comparison with shorter lesions. The efficacy of long balloons (30 or 40 mm) in long lesions was evaluated. Eighty-two patients had 84 PTCA procedures with a primary long balloon. In all, 86 lesions were available for analysis. Data were collected prospectively on standard PTCA procedure forms. Coronary angiograms were reviewed and measured with digital calipers. Hospital charts were examined for complications. PTCA was performed in the left anterior descending artery in 44 cases (51%), the right coronary artery in 29 (34%) and the circumflex artery in 13 (15%). With the use of a modified classification system, 47 lesions (55%) were class C, 24 (28%) were class B2 and 15 (17%) were class B1. Mean lesion length was 22 +/- 11 mm (range 10 to 72), and 38 lesions (44%) were > or = 20 mm. Twelve patients received an intracoronary stent. The long balloon alone produced angiographic success (< 50% residual stenosis) in 77 lesions (90%). Angiographic success was achieved ultimately in all stenoses, using a stent in 7 patients and a short balloon in 2. There were 2 deaths (2%) and 1 Q-wave myocardial infarction (1%). One patient needed coronary artery bypass surgery. Clinical success without death, Q-wave infarction or bypass surgery was achieved in 83 of 86 procedures (97%). In conclusion, the use of long PTCA balloons with adjuvant stenting produced excellent results in these long stenoses. Lesion length was not a precursor of poor angiographic or clinical outcome.     

Bovine endometrial retinol-binding protein secretion, messenger ribonucleic acid expression, and cellular localization during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the safety and efficacy of stent placement in patients with poorly controlled hypertension and renal artery stenoses, which are difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty alone. BACKGROUND: Preliminary experience with stent placement suggests improved results over balloon angioplasty alone in patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. METHODS: Balloon-expandable stents were placed in 100 consecutive patients (133 renal arteries) with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Sixty-seven of the patients had unilateral renal artery stenosis treated and 33 had bilateral renal artery stenoses treated with stents placed in both renal arteries. RESULTS: Angiographic success, as determined by quantitative angiography, was obtained in 132 (99%) of 133 lesions. Early clinical success was achieved in 76% of the patients. Six months after stent placement, the systolic blood pressure was reduced from 173 +/- 25 to 147 +/- 23 mm Hg (p < 0.001); the diastolic pressure from 88 +/- 17 to 76 +/- 12 mm Hg (p < 0.001); and the mean number of antihypertensive medications per patient from 2.6 +/- 1 to 2.0 +/- 0.9 (p < 0.001). Angiographic follow-up at a mean of 8.7 +/- 5.0 months in 67 patients revealed restenosis (>50% diameter narrowing) in 15 (19%) of 80 stented vessels. CONCLUSIONS: Renal artery stenting is an effective treatment for renovascular hypertension, with a low angiographic restenosis rate. Stent placement appears to be a very attractive therapy in patients with lesions difficult to treat with balloon angioplasty such as renal aorto-ostial lesions and restenotic lesions, as well as after a suboptimal balloon angioplasty result.     

Relationship between glomerular epithelial cell injury and proteinuria in IgA nephropathy

The cost of in-hospital percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) has risen since the introduction of the coronary stent. Increased attention is now being given to the PTCA charges in Japan and a multicenter study is necessary with regard to in-hospital charges. To clarify the differences in in-hospital charges for PTCA with and without coronary stent [Stent Group and plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) Group, respectively], we studied the PTCA charges of 352 patients in 6 hospitals. Age, male gender and extent of coronary artery disease were not different. The ratio of acute myocardial infarction ranged from 16% to 64% and that of coronary stenting ranged from 24% to 65% (p < 0.001). In-hospital charge ranged from 1.4 +/- 0.8 to 2.2 +/- 1.0 million yen (p < 0.0001). The procedural charge accounted for 53% to 75% of the in-hospital charge (p < 0.01). The in-hospital charge ranged from 1.6 +/- 0.7 to 3.3 +/- 1.6 million yen in the Stent Group, higher than the charge of 1.1 +/- 0.8 to 1.9 +/- 0.7 million yen in the POBA Group (p < 0.0001). There was a statistical difference in the number of balloon catheters used (1.1 +/- 0.4 to 2.1 +/- 0.9, p < 0.005) but not in the mean number of stents used (1.1 +/- 0.3 to 1.4 +/- 0.7). The procedural charge of the institutes with higher stenting rate (> 45%) seemed to be lower than that of the institutes with lower stenting rate (p < 0.02). In conclusion, there are large variation between institutions in PTCA charges, and in-hospital charges increased with the use of stents on introduction of the Diagnosis Related Group used in the United States. We should charge separately for coronary stenting and POBA. Despite any initial increase in the in-hospital charge for coronary stenting compared to POBA, successful stent implantation will result in a superior saving in procedural charges.     

Another look at the AIDS virus]

Stenting of the internal carotid artery is facilitated by stenting across the carotid bifurcation and sizing the diameter of a self-expanding stent to the large common carotid segment. This usually results in marked oversizing of the self-expanding stent in the internal carotid segment. This study was done to determine the relationship between stent oversizing and late luminal loss index after stenting of the internal carotid artery. Between September 1995 and March 1997, there were 165 patients (189 vessels) who underwent successful carotid stenting with self-expanding stents. Fifty-nine patients (63 vessels) had six-month follow-up carotid angiograms and on-line quantitative angiographic analysis. The mean reference diameter of the internal carotid arteries was 4.93+/-1.31 mm. Nominal stent size was 5 mm in 4 patients, 6 mm in 6 patients, 8 mm in 106 patients, 10 mm in 77 patients, and 12 mm in 1 patient. The average stent/patient was 1.03+/-0.16. There were three patients who had more than 50% diameter renarrowing at follow-up. The mean late loss index was 0.25+/-0.41. By linear regression analysis, there was no clear linear relationship between stent oversizing and late loss index after stenting (correlation coefficient = -0.21, P = 0.09). When analysis of variance with linear contrast was used to analyze six groups of different stent/artery ratios (from 1.4 to > or = 2), late loss indexes are significantly lower in the groups of high stent/artery ratio than the groups of low stent/artery ratio (P = 0.01). The process of oversizing of self-expanding stents deployed in the internal carotid artery does not appear to be associated with late restenosis and high stent/artery ratio seems to be associated with low late loss index.     

Long-term (4- to 6-year) outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting: paucity of late clinical stent-related problems

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective single-center study was to evaluate the longer-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stenting in the treatment of native coronary and saphenous vein bypass graft disease. BACKGROUND: The STRESS (Stent Restenosis Study) and BENESTENT (Belgian Netherlands Stent) trials have demonstrated a decrease in both angiographic restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization in the 1st year for vessels treated by stenting rather than balloon angioplasty. Longer-term (1 to 5 years) clinical results of Palmaz-Schatz stenting are not yet well established. Late migration of the stent, metal fatigue, endarteritis and late restenosis have all been proposed as potential late clinical complications of coronary stent implantation. METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 175 consecutive patients who underwent elective placement of 194 Palmaz-Schatz stents in 185 vessels. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction, recurrent angina or any revascularization) were assessed at 6 weeks, 2, 4 and 6 months, 1 year and yearly thereafter. Clinical follow-up was available on all patients at a mean +/- SD of 54 +/- 17 months. RESULTS: Angiographic success was achieved in 173 patients (98.9%); angiographic restenosis was observed at 6 months in 26.1% of target sites. The survival rate was 86.7% at 5 years, with a 5-year event-free survival rate decreasing progressively to 50.7%, reflecting primarily repeat revascularization procedures (41.2% at 5 years). However, the rate of repeat revascularization of the treatment site (target site revascularization [TSR]) was 14.4%, 17.7% and 19.8% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively, with late (> 1 year) TSR driven by in-stent restenosis in only 3 patients (1.7%). Rates of both 5-year survival (70.5% vs. 93.4%) and event-free survival (21.1% vs. 63.3%) were lower for patients who underwent saphenous vein graft (SVG) stenting than for those with native coronary artery stenting. However, 5-year TSR rates were similar for SVGs (21.9%) and native vessels (19.2%), indicating that the higher incidence of repeat revascularization for SVGs was due to an increase in non-TSR, driven by progressive disease at other sites. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term outcome of stenting shows stability of the treated lesion, with only a slight increase in TSR between 2 and 5 years (17.1% to 19.8%). The progressive increase in repeat revascularization over that period (24% to 41%) and most ongoing late events can be attributed to the progression of coronary disease at other sites, rather than to late deterioration of the stent result itself. Such non-TSR events account for the majority of clinical events in the patients who underwent SVG stenting.     

Procedural outcome and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty versus new device interventions for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses

Strategies for dilatation of bifurcation stenoses have continued to evolve over the past several years. However, there is limited experience on the efficacy of various nonballoon interventional devices and their results in comparison with balloon angioplasty. We, therefore, analysed our data in 72 patients of coronary artery disease with true bifurcation stenoses with balloon angioplasty or new device interventions (NDI). All patients underwent dilatation of both the primary vessel and side branch ostial stenosis. Balloon angioplasty using double guidewire with sequential or simultaneous (kissing balloon) balloon inflation in the two vessels was performed in 42 patients. Thirty patients underwent NDI, using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in 12, rotablation in 6 and elective coronary stents in 12 patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic variables between patients in the two groups. While the preprocedural luminal diameter stenosis was similar, the residual stenosis was significantly less, both in the primary vessel and side branch, after NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. The procedure was successful in 96.6 percent patients treated with NDI and 83.3 percent with balloon angioplasty (p < 0.01) with relief of obstruction in both branches without any major complications. Freedom from subsequent coronary events in the form of angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, bypass graft surgery of death was significantly more, both at 6 months (92% versus 65.6%, p < 0.001) and 12 months (81.8% versus 53.1%, p < 0.001) in the group of patients treated with NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. It is, therefore, concluded that NDI including DCA, rotablation and elective stenting are associated with higher rate of success, lesser complications and better event-free survival in comparison to balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses.     

Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results

BACKGROUND: Treatment of calcified (in contrast to simple) lesions with PTCA has been associated with a lower success rate and more procedural complications. Rotablation can improve acute results, but the high restenosis rate remains a problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with complex and calcified lesions treated with a combination of rotablation and stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with 106 lesions had rotablation prior to coronary stenting. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting was used without subsequent anticoagulation in 93% of patients. Procedural success was achieved in 93.4% of lesions. Acute stent thrombosis occurred in two lesions (1.9%), and subacute stent thrombosis in one lesion (0.9%). Angiographic follow-up was performed in 82.5% of lesions at 4.6 +/- 1.9 months with an angiographic restenosis rate of 22.5%. Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients at 6.4 +/- 3 months; target lesion revascularization was needed in 18% of lesions; Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in 1.3%, coronary bypass surgery in 4.0%, and death in 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal coronary stenting after rotablation in calcified and complex lesions can be performed with a high success rate, an acceptable rate of procedural complications, and a low rate of stent thrombosis. This approach was associated with a low incidence of angiographic restenosis compared with results usually obtained with other interventional strategies in calcified and complex lesion subsets.