Duodenogastric reflux potentiates the injurious effects of gastroesophageal reflux

Experimental studies have shown that the severity of esophageal mucosal injury in gastroesophageal reflux disease is related to the reflux of both gastric and duodenal juice. The purpose of this study was to determine whether duodenal juice potentiates esophageal injury in patients with reflux disease or, in fact, causes no harm allowing acid and pepsin to do the damage. A total of 148 consecutive patients who had no previous gastric or esophageal surgery underwent endoscopy and biopsy, manometry, and 24-hour esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring. Esophageal injury was defined by the presence of erosive esophagitis, stricture, or biopsy-proved Barrett's esophagus. Exposure to duodenal juice, identified by the absorbance of bilirubin, was defined as an exposure time exceeding the ninety-fifth percentile measured in 35 volunteers. To separate the effects of gastric and duodenal juice, patients were stratified according to their acid exposure time. One hundred patients had documented acid reflux on pH monitoring, and in 63 of them it was combined with reflux of duodenal juice. Patients with combined reflux (50 of 63) were more likely to have injury than patients without combined reflux (22 of 37; P < 0.05). When the acid exposure time was greater than 10%, patients with injury (n = 40) had a greater exposure to duodenal juice (median exposure time 17.2% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.006) than patients without injury (n = 5), but there was no difference in their acid exposure (16.9% vs. 13.4%). Patients with dysplasia of Barrett's epithelium (n = 9) had a greater exposure to duodenal juice (median exposure time 30.2% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.04) compared to patients without complications (n = 25), whereas acid exposure was the same (16.4% vs. 15%). Duodenal juice adds a noxious component to the refluxed gastric juice and potentiates the injurious effects of gastric juice on the esophageal mucosa.     

GERD revisited: advances in pathogenesis

A balance of aggressive forces (reflux, caustic gastric juice) and defensive forces (acid clearance, epithelial defense) determine the occurrence of GERD. Guarding against reflux, the gastroesophageal junction is composed of both a smooth muscle element (the LES) and a diaphragmatic element, which normally supplement each other in both a static condition as well as during dynamic stresses associated with increased intraabdominal pressure or swallowing. With a normal LES pressure, virtually all reflux events occur by tLESR. Susceptibility to stress reflux (abrupt increase in intraabdominal pressure) inherent during periods of diminished LES pressure is dramatically increased by disabling the diaphragmatic sphincter, as occurs with large hernias. During swallowing, large hernias also impair the process of esophageal emptying thereby prolonging acid clearance. These functional impairments of the gastroesophageal junction associated with hiatus hernia lead to increased esophageal acid exposure and offer one explanation for the chronicity of reflux disease.     

Leprosy patients with lepromatous disease recognize cross-reactive T cell epitopes in the Mycobacterium leprae 10-kD antigen

BACKGROUND: Cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GER) may originate in extrathoracic airway receptors made hypersensitive by acid-induced mucosal injury. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of laryngeal disease and dysfunction in the pathogenesis of GER-associated cough in nonasthmatic patients. METHODS: Seven patients with GER-associated cough were compared with 7 patients with GER but no cough. The patients underwent fiberoptic endoscopy for assessment of laryngitis and esophagitis (expressed by scores); esophageal manometry; 24-hour pH monitoring; lung function tests; and histamine inhalation challenge with assessment of bronchial threshold (concentration provoking 10% fall in FEV1 [PC10]), extrathoracic airway threshold (concentration provoking 25% fall in the maximal midinspiratory flow [PC25MIF50]), and cough threshold (concentration provoking 5 or more coughs PCcough). The patients were reevaluated after 3 months of medical treatment for GER. RESULTS: Patients with cough, compared with those without cough, had significantly higher laryngitis scores (P = .002), lower esophageal sphincter pressures, longer time with pH below 4 (P = .003), greater number of episodes of reflux longer than 5 minutes (P = .016), longer esophageal clearance time (P = .048), and significantly lower PC25MIF50 (P = .005) and PCcough (P = .008) values. Laryngitis score was significantly inversely related to either PCcough (P < .001) or PC25MIF50 (P <.01) but not to PC10. Laryngitis score, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all closely related to GER severity. After GER treatment, laryngitis, PC25MIF50, and PCcough were all significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that GER-associated cough is strongly associated with laryngeal disease and dysfunction consequent to acid reflux injury in nonasthmatic patients.     

Barrett's esophagus: pathogenesis, epidemiology, functional abnormalities, malignant degeneration, and surgical management

Barrett's esophagus (i.e. columnar epithelial metaplasia in the distal esophagus) is an acquired condition that in most patients results from chronic gastroesophageal reflux. It is a disorder of the white male in the Western world with a prevalence of about 1/400 population. Due to the decreased sensitivity of the columnar epithelium to symptoms, Barrett's esophagus remains undiagnosed in the majority of patients. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with Barrett's esophagus has a more severe character and is more frequently associated with complications as compared with reflux patients without columnar mucosa. This appears to be due to a combination of a mechanically defective lower esophageal sphincter, inefficient esophageal clearance function, and gastric acid hypersecretion. Excessive reflux of alkaline duodenal contents may be responsible for the development of complications (i.e., stricture, ulcer, and dysplasia). Therapy of benign Barrett's esophagus is directed towards treatment of the underlying reflux disease. Barrett's esophagus is associated with a 30- to 125-fold increased risk for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The reasons for the dramatic rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma, which occurred during the past years, are unknown. High grade dysplasia in a patient with columnar mucosa is an ominous sign for malignant degeneration. Whether an esophagectomy should be performed in patients with high grade dysplasia remains controversial. Complete resection of the tumor and its lymphatic drainage is the procedure of choice in all patients with a resectable carcinoma who are fit for surgery. In patients with tumors located in the distal esophagus, this can be achieved by a transhiatal en-bloc esophagectomy and proximal gastrectomy. Early adenocarcinoma can be cured by this approach. The value of multimodality therapy in patients with advanced tumors needs to be shown in randomized prospective trials.     

Effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia

The aims of this study were to assess the effect of pneumatic dilation on gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia, differentiate esophageal acid due to lactate from acid due to gastroesophageal reflux, and determine if chest pain and heartburn are reliable indicators of gastroesophageal reflux. Eight untreated achalasia patients underwent pre- and postdilation esophageal fluid/food residue lactate and pH analysis, esophageal manometry, 24-hr pH monitoring, and symptom assessment. All patients had a successful clinical outcome and a decrease in lower esophageal sphincter pressure from 29.1 +/- 12.7 to 14.7 +/- 3.8 mm Hg (mean +/- SD; P = 0.04). Abnormal acid exposure was present in two patients before and two patients after dilation. Postdilation acid exposure was mild. Lactate was detected before dilation in all patients. A lactate concentration >2 mmol/liter was associated with acidic residue and one abnormal 24-hr pH profile. There was no correlation between an abnormal 24-hr pH test and age, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, or duration of symptoms prior to treatment. Chest pain and heartburn were unrelated to drops in pH. Gastroesophageal reflux is rare in untreated achalasia and esophageal acidity may result from ingestion of acidic foods or production of lactate. Mild gastroesophageal reflux occurs after dilation but is of no clinical significance. Chest pain and heartburn are not indicators of acid reflux in achalasia.     

Laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease with poor esophageal body motility

Impaired esophageal body motility is a complication of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In patients with this disease, a 360-degree fundoplication may result in severe postoperative dysphagia. Forty-six patients with GERD who had a weak lower esophageal sphincter pressure and a positive acid reflux score associated with impaired esophageal body peristalsis in the distal esophagus (amplitude <30 mm Hg and >10% simultaneous or interrupted waves) were selected to undergo laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication. They were compared with 16 similar patients with poor esophageal body function who underwent Nissen fundoplication. The patients who underwent Toupet fundoplication had less dysphagia than those who had the Nissen procedure (9% vs.44%; P=0.0041). Twenty-four-hour ambulatory pH monitoring and esophageal manometry were repeated in 31 Toupet patients 6 months after surgery. Percentage of time of esophageal exposure to pH <4.0, DeMeester reflux score, lower esophageal pressure, intra-abdominal length, vector volume, and distal esophageal amplitude all improved significantly after surgery. Ninety-one percent of patients were free of reflux symptoms. The laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication provides an effective antireflux barrier according to manometric, pH, and symptom criteria. It avoids potential postoperative dysphagia in patients with weak esophageal peristalsis and results in improved esophageal body function 6 months after surgery.     

Physiology and biophysics in electrocardiography

Simultaneous esophageal and gastric manometry and intraesophageal pH monitoring were performed in 12 patients with gastroesophageal reflux diseases in order to compare the frequency and mechanism of reflux in upright and supine postures. It was found that there was no differences in the number of reflux episodes, acid clearance time and percentage time of pH below 4 (P > 0.05). Frequency of reflux associated with lower esophageal sphinter relaxation (LESR) and gastric press increase was similar in two postures (P > 0.05). The results suggest that upright reflux may be as important as supine reflux in the development of reflux esophagitis. The main machanism of reflux in the two postures is LESR. Increase of gastric press may be a factor leading to gastroesophageal reflux.     

Variables influencing parental perception of inherited metabolic diseases before and after genetic counselling

BACKGROUND: Sixty percent of adults has typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux in Chile. AIM: To report the clinical and laboratory features of patients with gastroesophageal reflux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred thirty-four patients (255 male) with gastroesophageal reflux were included in a prospective protocol that included clinical analysis, manometry and endoscopy in all patients, barium swallow in 427, scintigraphy in 195, acid reflux test in 359, 24 h pH in 175, and differential potential of gastroesophageal mucosa in 73 patients. RESULTS: There was no correlation between the severity of symptoms and the endoscopical severity. Patients with Barret esophagus were 12 years older, were male in a greater proportion and had a higher proportion of manometrically incompetent sphincters than patients with esophageal reflux but without esophagitis or with erosive esophagitis. Severity of acid reflux, measured with 24 h pH monitoring was proportional to the endoscopical damage of the mucosa. There was a close relationship between the mucosal change limit determined with differential potentials and with endoscopy. No short esophagi were found. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux must be assessed using several objective measures to determine the severity of their pathological alterations.     

Re: Second-trimester maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and unconjugated oestriol after early transvaginal multifetal pregnancy reduction

BACKGROUND: There is a certain amount of controversy regarding the need to divide the short gastric vessels (SGV) in laparoscopic fundoplication for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). In addition, there is often difficulty in identifying the crural fibers when encircling the lower esophagus. METHODS: We determine whether it is necessary to divide the SGV by trying to appose the gastric fundus to the anterior abdominal wall intraoperatively. If this could be done easily, the SGV are preserved. When their division is required, a posterior gastric approach is employed. We have also found that the injection of methylene blue into the left crural fibers anterior to the esophagus is helpful in identifying the left side when dissection posterior to the gastroesophageal junction is difficult. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 1995 we performed 20 laparoscopic fundoplications for GERD. All patients had at least grade 3 esophagitis (Savary-Miller scale), increased esophageal exposure to acid (median DeMeester score of 195), and decreased lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. The median operative time was 175 min. There were no conversions to open surgery, and there was no mortality. Three patients developed transient postoperative dysphagia and one patient had pneumonia. The median hospital stay was 3 days; all patients were free of reflux symptoms at follow-up ranging from 7 to 42 months. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the techniques described by us aid in intraoperative decision making and allow laparoscopic fundoplication to be both simple and effective.     

Esophageal function in systemic sclerosis: a prospective evaluation of motility and acid reflux in 36 patients

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disorder which frequently involves the esophagus, with severe gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and dysphagia as clinical consequences of esophageal dysmotility. The relationship between the severity and extent of esophageal acid exposure and the specific manometric disturbances has received little attention. Similarly, a paucity of manometric data exists regarding pharyngeal/upper esophageal sphincter (UES) function in SSc patients. We prospectively studied 36 SSc patients using computerized solid-state manometric and ambulatory dual-pH (upper and lower esophageal) monitoring, to define further the relationship between esophageal dysmotility and severity of GER in these patients. Patients were separated for analysis into two subgroups based on the absence (group 1, N = 25) or presence (group 2, N = 11) of distal esophageal peristalsis. SSc disease variant (diffuse vs. limited) and duration of illness were inaccurate predictors of the presence and severity of esophageal involvement. The mean lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure for the SSc patients (15.8 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, mean +/- SE) was significantly lower (p < 0.01) than that for a control group (26.0 +/- 2.1 mm Hg). There was no significant difference between the mean LES pressure for group 1 (15.0 +/- 1.6 mm Hg) and group 2 (17.5 +/- 1.6 mm Hg) patients. Although distal esophageal aperistalsis was noted in 70% of patients, normal proximal esophageal contraction pressures were documented in all cases. Mean UES pressure was significantly (p < 0.01) lower in group 1 (52.5 +/- 4.6 mm Hg) than in group 2 (80.5 +/- 10.6 mm Hg). The mean duration of UES relaxation and the mean time interval between the onset of UES relaxation and onset of pharyngeal contraction were significantly (p < 0.05) shorter for group 1 than group 2 patients. Pharyngeal pressures, peristalsis, and other aspects of pharyngeal/UES coordination were normal. Excessive distal esophageal acid exposure was often seen in patients in both subgroups, but it was significantly (p < 0.01) greater in group 1. Excessive proximal esophageal acid exposure was documented only in patients with absent distal peristalsis. Linear regression analysis revealed a poor correlation between the severity of esophageal acid exposure and the LES pressure. Thus, the severity and extent of GER in SSc is most closely related to the integrity of distal esophageal peristalsis.     

Reflux esophagitis: manometry and Ph measurement

Manometry and pH-metry are essential in the examination of functional disturbances of the esophagus. Proven indications for manometry are dysphagia of unknown origin and noncardiac chest pain; in reflux esophagitis manometry is used for measuring pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter and detecting motility disorders of the esophageal body, pH-metry is used as long-term pH-metry to quantify gastroesophageal reflux during day and night; furthermore long-term pH-metry is important in the classification of atypical esophagitis. Recording gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal motility may influence planning of therapy and predict prognosis. Before antireflux surgery manometry and pH-metry are useful in judging the clearance mechanisms of the esophagus. Used critically, manometry and pH-metry can be very helpful as cost-effective diagnostic tools in the long-term therapy of reflux esophagitis.     

Home care triage nurse

OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of mechanical factors to the function of different types of fundoplication. DESIGN AND SETTING: An experimental bench-top study using abattoir-sourced pig esophagus and stomach placed on a tray. Preliminary esophageal myotomy ensured free reflux of 'intragastric fluid'. INTERVENTIONS: Anterior, posterior, and total fundoplications were performed on each of ten sets of viscera. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lower esophageal sphincter pressure was measured using a conventional esophageal manometry catheter. Intragastric pressure was measured with a single channel intragastric manometry catheter, whilst the stomach was inflated with coloured water. The maximum intragastric pressure or the pressure measured when the fundoplication yielded to gastric distension was recorded. RESULTS: All three types of fundoplication restored adequate competence to the gastroesophageal junction, although high-volume gastric infusions resulted in fundoplication yield in 4/10 anterior and 4/10 posterior fundoplications. Gastric distension resulted in fundal dilatation and consequent compression of the adjacent esophagus. Fundoplication generated a median rise of 11-13.5 mmHg in lower esophageal sphincter pressure, comparable to pressures reported in the postoperative clinical setting. Significantly greater intragastric volumes and pressures were tolerated following total fundoplication. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that mechanical factors could be major contributors to the ability of a fundoplication to restore gastroesophageal competence. Anterior, posterior and total fundoplications are all effective procedures.     

A randomized controlled trial of two methods for collection of sterile urine in neonates

The cause of laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinomas is likely multifactorial. Smoking is an important factor, but mucosal damage from gastroesophageal reflux may also contribute. The purpose of this study was to determine whether gastroesophageal reflux is more common in patients with laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas than in those without these malignancies. Over an 8-year period, we correlated the results of clinical and radiographic examinations of the pharynx and esophagus to pH monitoring results in 798 patients with a variety of upper aerodigestive tract symptoms and who underwent both pH monitoring and barium esophagography. In this group, 63 patients (52 men, 11 women) had laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas, and 735 patients (319 men, 416 women) had neither malignancy. Abnormal pH findings were defined as a total percentage of esophageal acid exposure time of 6% or more as determined with the esophageal probe, or any reflux event detected with the pharyngeal probe. Thirty-four of 63 patients with carcinomas (54%) had abnormal pH-monitoring results: Esophageal acid exposure was abnormal in 10 patients, pharyngeal acid exposure was abnormal in 7 patients, and acid exposure was abnormal in both areas in 17 patients. Of the 735 patients without malignancies, 365 (50%) had abnormal pH-monitoring results (p > 0.05). In this population of patients, abnormal results of pH monitoring were common, occurring in 399 (50%) of 798 patients, but no significant difference was found between results in those with and without laryngeal or pharyngeal carcinomas. Therefore, our study found that gastroesophageal reflux as shown by pH monitoring was not more common in patients with these malignancies.     

Design and synthesis of small semi-mimetic peptides with immunomodulatory activity based on myelin basic protein (MBP)

Bile reflux has been implicated in the pathogenesis and malignant degeneration of Barrett's esophagus, but clinical studies in patients with adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus are lacking. Ambulatory esophageal measurement of acid and bile reflux was performed with the previously validated fiberoptic bilirubin monitoring system (Bilitec) combined with a pH probe in 20 asymptomatic volunteers, 19 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but no mucosal injury, 45 patients with GERD and erosive esophagitis, 33 patients with GERD and Barrett's esophagus, and 14 patients with early adenocarcinoma arising in Barrett's esophagus. Repeat studies were done in 15 patients under medical acid suppression and 16 patients after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. The mean esophageal bile exposure time showed an exponential increase from GERD patients without esophagitis to those with erosive esophagitis and benign Barrett's esophagus and was highest in patients with early carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus (P <0.01). Pathologic esophageal bile exposure was documented in 18 (54.5%) of 33 patients with benign Barrett's esophagus and 11 (78.6%) of 14 patients with early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Nissen fundoplication but not medical acid suppression resulted in complete suppression of bile reflux. Bile reflux into the esophagus is particularly prevalent in patients with Barrett's esophagus and early cancer. Bile reflux into the esophagus can be completely suppressed by Nissen fundoplication but not medical acid suppression alone.     

Characteristic expression of 105-kDa heat shock protein (HSP105) in various tissues of nonstressed and heat-stressed rats

BACKGROUND: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) are the major mechanism permitting gastroesophageal reflux (GER). Little information is available on how anti-reflux surgery affects reflux mechanisms, especially TLESRs. We evaluated the effects of partial fundoplication (Belsey Mark IV) on reflux mechanisms. METHODS: Sixteen patients were prospectively studied before and after Belsey Mark-IV operation by endoscopy, 24-h esophageal pH-metry, and simultaneous recording of pH and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) characteristics by sleeve manometry. RESULTS: The operation was successful in 14 of 16 patients (87%). Fasting and postprandial reflux decreased significantly (P < 0.01) after the operation. Partial fundoplication significantly (P < 0.05) decreased the number of TLESRs per hour in the fasting and postprandial period from 3.2+/-0.4 and 5.6+/-0.5 to 1.7+/-0.3 and 2.8+/-0.4, respectively. The percentage of TLESRs associated with reflux also decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Basal LES pressure increased from 14.7+/-2.1 mmHg to 17.9+/-2.6 mmHg (not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Partial fundoplication controls GER through a reduction in the number of TLESRs and by decreasing the number of relaxations associated with reflux.     

Esophagitis in Sprague-Dawley rats is mediated by free radicals

Free radical-mediated esophagitis was studied during duodenogastroesophageal reflux (mixed reflux) or acid reflux in rats. The influence of reflux on esophageal glutathione levels was also examined. Mixed reflux caused more gross mucosal injury than acid reflux. Gross mucosal injury occurred in the mid-esophagus. Total glutathione (GSH) in the esophageal mucosa of control rats was highest in the distal esophagus. The time course of esophageal GSH in rats treated by mixed reflux showed a significant decrease 4 hr after initiation of reflux, followed by a significant increase from the 12th hour on. Mucosal GSH was increased in both reflux groups after 24 hr but significantly more so in the mixed than in the acid reflux group. The free radical scavenger superoxide dismutase (SOD) prevented esophagitis and was associated with decreased GSH levels. GSH depletion by buthionine sulfoximine (BSO) prevented esophagitis and stimulated SOD production in the esophageal mucosa. It is concluded that gastroesophageal reflux is associated with oxidative stress in the esophageal mucosa. The lower GSH levels in the mid-esophagus may predispose to damage in this area. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux causes more damage than pure acid reflux. Oxidative stress leads to GSH depletion of the esophageal mucosa in the first few hours following damage but then stimulates GSH production. GSH depletion by BSO does not worsen esophagitis since it increases the esophageal SOD concentration.     

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: clinical experience and outcome in first 100 patients

Using retrospective chart review, the authors evaluated the results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in their first 100 patients. All patients were diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease. More than 90% of the patients in this series were symptomatically improved, and 92% of those studied endoscopically had healed esophagitis and intact fundoplication. No deaths, esophageal injuries, or splenic injuries occurred. Laparoscopic fundoplication can be performed safely and efficiently. Using a linear stapler enables rapid and safe fundi mobilization. Selective manometrics and ambulatory pH monitoring provide excellent results. Laparoscopic Nissen is safe and as effective as the open procedure. Research centers have noted some differences in postoperative function of the lower esophageal sphincter, but symptomatically patient satisfaction is comparable.     

Nissen fundoplication for reflux esophagitis. Long-term clinical and endoscopic results in 109 of 127 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the clinical and endoscopic long-term results of Nissen fundoplication in reflux esophagitis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Nissen fundoplication has been reported to give good results in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux with success rates up to 78-97%. Most of the previous studies on long-term results of fundoplication have, however, been based on interviews with only sporadic endoscopic examinations. METHODS: Of 127 patients consecutively treated with Nissen fundoplication for reflux esophagitis, 109 were available for follow-up after a median of 77 months. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was done in 105 cases, and all the patients with reflux symptoms or abnormal endoscopic observations were referred to esophageal 24-hour pH monitoring and manometry. RESULTS: No symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were reported by 73 of the 109 patients, but dysphagia was present in 47. Endoscopy showed defective fundic wrap in 24 patients. Objective evidence of reflux was found in 24 patients (endoscopic esophagitis in 18 and pathologic 24-hour pH score without esophagitis in 6). Esophagitis was found in 14 of the 24 patients with defective wrap, but in only 4 of the 81 with infact wrap. CONCLUSIONS: Nissen fundoplication alleviated symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and cured esophagitis in great majority of cases. The main determinant of outcome was the state of the fundic wrap.     

Double-blind crossover study of ranitidine and ebrotidine in gastro-esophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is multifactorial disorder in which acid exposure has a central role in the mucosal damage, and the mainstay of medical treatment is the suppression of gastric acid secretion justifying the use of H2 receptors antagonists. In our study we compared the effects of ranitidine and ebrotidine, a novel H2 antagonist with gastroprotective properties, on the motor, pH and endoscopic aspects of GERD in randomized cross-over trial in humans. Twenty patients with endoscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis were included in the study. Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH-metry were done with the use Synectics (Sweden) systems. The same examinations were repeated after 20 days period of treatment with either ranitidine or ebrotidine, given in single dose 300 and 800 mg (nocte) respectively. The pressure within the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in the untreated and treated with ebrotidine or ranitidine patients remained lowered. Patients with GERD showed increase in duration and decrease in amplitude and propagation of peristaltic waves in the esophageal body which were not improved after treatment. Complete healing after 40 days of treatment was comparable with ebrotidine and ranitidine and averaged about 40%. The pH-metry showed improvement in treated patients in the reflux frequency and time pH below 4, ranitidine being more effective than ebrotidine. It can be concluded that GERD patients showed weaker primary peristalsis unrelated to LES pressure and treatment. Treatment with ebrotidine or ranitidine reduced significantly the endoscopic and self-assessment score, ebrotidine and ranitidine being equally effective in healing of esophageal mucosal lesions.     

A new operative technique of posttraumatic syringomyelia: thecoperitoneal shunt]

The aims of this study were to evaluate the gastric emptying of solids in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis, correlate the esophageal motility abnormalities with their gastric emptying status, delineate the symptoms suggestive of abnormal gastric emptying, and assess the effect of metoclopramide in patients with abnormally slow gastric emptying. Twenty patients underwent esophageal motility evaluation and gastric emptying studies with a radiolabeled solid meal. Gastric emptying was also measured in 13 healthy volunteers. Four patients in whom esophageal motility was normal also had an accompanying normal rate of gastric emptying. In 16 patients with abnormal esophageal motility, mean gastric emptying was significantly delayed as compared with that in normal subjects (67.4% vs 49.8% retention of isotope at 2 hours, P < .05). Ten patients had absolute criteria for slow gastric emptying (>+2 SD). However, only postprandial bloating and early satiety were symptoms that accurately predicted slow radionuclide emptying. In four of these patients in whom gastric emptying was slow, 10 mg intramuscular metoclopramide significantly (P < .05 vs baseline) accelerated the gastric emptying of the same test meal. We conclude that (1) gastric emptying of solids was delayed in approximately two thirds of patients with abnormal esophageal motility, whereas it was normal in patients with normal esophageal motor function; (2) metoclopramide significantly accelerated this slow gastric emptying; and (3) delayed gastric emptying contributes to the severity of the gastroesophageal reflux frequently present in patients with progressive systemic sclerosis, and promotility agents offer a valuable therapeutic approach.