Laparoscopic hernia surgery--status of minimal invasive techniques in a spectrum of surgical indications

Endoscopic surgery led in the nineties to a discussion on surgical treatment of hernias. At the present time there are three groups of operative procedures: the conventional procedure--Shouldice, Bassini--the open tension-free procedure with implantation of a mesh--Lichtenstein, Gilbert-Rutkow--and the endoscopic procedure (predominantly transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP) and total extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP)). The debate on the optimal therapy of hernias is understandable in view of the large number of hernia operations which are carried out. Numerous studies, some randomized, have demonstrated both the advantages and the disadvantages of the individual operative procedures. In addition to the recurrence rate and the complications, the cost factor and the associated socio-economic aspects of the particular operation play an increasingly important role in the decision on the method that should be used. In December 1995 some Austrian surgeons, who concerned themselves with problems of hernia repair already before the definitive introduction of laparoscopic hernia repair in today's surgery, came together on the occasion of a "Consensus Conference". During the meeting a summary of all relevant aspects of the complex of problems was worked out and summarized in a catalog of indications for the different operative interventions. The main statement was that the traditional open surgery, which can be performed under local anesthesia is indicated for an unilateral primary hernia. In case of an unclear finding at the contralateral side, as well as in case of a recurrent hernia, an endoscopic procedure is indicated. Meanwhile the Hernia Forum of Zürs ("Zürser Hernienforum") was founded. The function of this forum is the realization of a prospective randomized study for hernia repair in Austria.     

A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open). METHODS: A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group 1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences. RESULTS: The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open. CONCLUSIONS: TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically reduced.     

Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy: the new gold standard of hernia repair?

The surgical treatment of the common inguinal hernia has been one of the most analyzed and debated topics in medicine. Recently, with the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, interest in minimally invasive surgical techniques has led to it's application for inguinal hernia repair. Current laparoscopic herniorrhaphies are based on the principles of conventional open preperitoneal repairs and are classified into two types: 1) transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) and 2) totally extraperitoneal repair (TEP). Common advantages to both techniques include a decrease in postoperative pain, earlier return to normal activity, and improved cosmesis. Both laparoscopic techniques have the disadvantage of requiring general or regional anesthesia and increased procedural costs. Lastly, there is a concern that laparoscopic hernia repair has not been around long enough to know the risk of late recurrences. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy, however, is a viable alternative to standard open inguinal hernia repair.     

The features of contralateral manifestations after the repair of unilateral inguinal hernia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Routine contralateral exploration in infants and children with unilateral clinical inguinal hernia is performed by many surgeons in a selected population of patients based on a presumed high incidence of patent processus vaginalis. Our purpose is to report the actual incidence of contralateral manifestations in infants and children after the repair of unilateral inguinal hernia. METHODS: From July 1985 through December 1995, 1,052 infants and children with unilateral inguinal hernia or hydrocele were treated in our hospital without contralateral exploration. Among them, 1,001 patients (95.2%) were followed up for 1 to 11 years to determine if contralateral hernia developed after unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy. RESULTS: The overall incidence of contralateral hernia was 11.6% (116 of 1,001). In boys, the incidence was 13.1%, 13.7%, and 11.7% in those under 1 year, under 2 years of age, and in total, respectively. In girls, the incidence was 9.6%, 13.9%, 11.3%, in those under 1 year, under 5 years of age, and in total, respectively. The side of the initial repair did not influence the subsequent development of contralateral inguinal hernia. In children with hydrocele, the incidence of contralateral hernias was lower (7.6%). In girls with sliding hernias the contralateral occurrence was 12.5%. CONCLUSION: Given this low incidence of contralateral hernia after unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy, the authors do not recommend contralateral exploration for infants and children with unilateral inguinal hernia.     

Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. A preperitoneal tension-free approach

At the present time laparoscopic herniorrhaphy appears to be successfully performed by utilizing a preperitoneal approach. The major indications are bilaterals hernia and the recurrent hernia. Other routine hernias may be done at the decision of the surgeon and patient depending upon the necessity of rapid return to work and desire to minimize pain. Utilizing this approach, the recurrence rate at the present time is less than 1%, which compares favorably with all other types of repair.     

Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Early results

BACKGROUND: In February 1993 a prospective randomized multicenter trial was initiated to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty to Shouldice herniorrhaphy as performed by surgeons of nonspecialized clinics. METHODS: Until January 1994, 87 patients with 108 hernias took part in the trial (43 Shouldice and 44 laparoscopic repairs). RESULTS: The laparoscopic procedure took significantly longer than did the open operation but caused less pain as measured by pain analogue score and consumption of paracetamol and narcotics. The postoperative complication rate was 26% in the open and 16% in the laparoscopic group. The patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged earlier and their convalescence was shorter than after open hernia repair. There has been one early recurrence in the laparoscopic and two in the open group to date with a mean follow-up of 201 days. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernia repair causes less pain than the conventional operation and enables the patient to return to full work and usual activities earlier. The recurrence rate will not be known for 5 years.     

Repair of ventral hernias with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch

BACKGROUND: Operations for large and recurrent abdominal hernias have a high associated recurrence rate, although it is lower when prosthetic material is used. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) seems to be the best tolerated prosthetic material in surgery. METHODS: A series of 45 ventral hernias repaired using ePTFE for closure or reinforcement of the herniorrhaphy has been evaluated prospectively. Thirty-six were midline incisional hernias and nine were transverse or pararectal ventral hernias. There were 13 recurrent ventral hernias and three defects were operated as an emergency procedure. The patch was sutured to the anterior aponeurosis with a running non-absorbable suture. Some other kind of intra-abdominal procedure was undertaken in 12 cases. RESULTS: ePTFE was well tolerated. Complications occurred in five patients. Major complications were found in three patients: cutaneous necrosis requiring a myocutaneous flap; and infection of the prosthesis (primary, and secondary to enterocutaneous fistula due to diverticulitis, both requiring removal of the patch). Mean follow-up was 39 months and hernia recurrence occurred in only one patient. CONCLUSION: This clinical experience shows that ePTFE is a very reliable prosthetic material for the repair of abdominal wall hernias.     

Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias

Break down after repair of recurrent ventral hernias can exceed 50 per cent. Laparoscopic techniques offer an alternative. This study evaluated the efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for recurrent ventral hernias. A retrospective review on all patients with a recurrent ventral hernia who underwent laparoscopic repair at our institution from August 1995 to June 1997 was performed. Demographic, operative, postoperative, and follow-up data were collected. Thirty-one patients underwent an attempted laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Sixteen were for recurrent hernias; 15 were successfully repaired laparoscopically. The patients were typically obese (mean body mass index, 30 kg/m2), had an average of 2.4 previous open repairs (range, 1-7), and six patients had previously placed intra-abdominal mesh. An average of 3.5 (range, 1-16) defects were found per patient with a mean total hernia size of 130 cm2 (6-480 cm2). In all cases, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene mesh (average, 299 cm2) was secured with transabdominal sutures. Postoperatively patients required an average of 19 mg of narcotics (MSO4 equivalent). Bowel function returned in 1.7 days. Length of stay averaged 2.0 days (1-4 days). There were two complications: cellulitis, which resolved with antibiotics, and skin break-down, which required mesh removal. With follow-up averaging 18 months (7-29 months), there is one recurrence; the case in which the mesh was removed. Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernia seems promising. Decreased hospital stays, postoperative pain, wound complications, and a low rate of recurrence are benefits of this technique.     

Day-case laparoscopic hernia repair

Some 114 patients (median age 52 years) underwent laparoscopic hernia repair as a day-case procedure. Twenty-one patients had bilateral and 11 recurrent hernias. Some 113 patients underwent transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair but one required conversion to open operation. Mean operating time was 24 min for unilateral and 38 min for bilateral repair. In an operating session of 3.5 h, up to five patients (mean 4.4) underwent surgery and as many as seven hernias were repaired. More than 10 per cent of patients were found to have a previously undiagnosed hernia on the opposite side. A total of 111 patients were discharged home on the day of surgery. Major complications included one omental bleed and one small bowel obstruction. Seroma was the commonest minor complication and occurred in 7 per cent of patients. More than 35 per cent of patients needed no postoperative analgesia. To date there has been one recurrence (follow-up range 2-18 months).     

The medical demands of the special athlete

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Before choosing between open and laparoscopic preperitoneal tension-free repair, a study comparing their safety and short-term outcome was needed. No randomised studies comparing the two hernia repair techniques have hitherto been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective randomised study was carried out comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 24) to open preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 25). RESULTS: When comparing unilateral repairs, the mean operation time was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in the open group (55 min) than in the laparoscopic group (66 min). Pain on movement (P < 0.05) and pain on coughing (P < 0.01) receded more rapidly in the laparoscopic group. The median time before return to work or normal activity was 7 days (range 1-60) in laparoscopic and 5 days (1-30) in open repair. There were five (21%) complications associated with the laparoscopic procedure, while the open procedure resulted in two (8%) complications. After a median follow-up of 18 months the recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group was 13% and in the open group 8%. CONCLUSIONS: In this study the open method was associated with fewer complications and recurrences than the laparoscopic technique. Despite the decreased postoperative discomfort after laparoscopic repair, there was no significant difference in median time before return to work or normal activity. These results together with the higher cost of the laparoscopic procedure suggest that the open method is more suitable at least for unilateral hernias.     

Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The use of a mesh in transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP) caries the risk of late rejection or infectious complications related to the mesh. The aim of this study was to describe the extent of these complications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 500 consecutive patients with TAPP for inguinal hernia. Results: Late mesh rejection was observed in three patients at 5-19 months after surgery. The mesh was removed via a suprapubic midline incision. At 3-4 month's follow-up, none of the patients had recurrence of the hernia, even though no hernia repair had been done. CONCLUSION: Late mesh rejection is a potential complication of TAPP and has to be considered when choosing the surgical method of hernia repair.     

Prospective randomized comparative study of laparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty]

To compare the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) and the open Lichtenstein technique, in 1992 a prospective randomized trial was initiated. Until 1995 108 patients with 130 hernias took part in the trial: 64 TAPP (group A) and 66 Lichtenstein (group B). 22 patients had simultaneous bilateral repairs. Laparoscopic approach (group A) was able to expose otherwise-occult controlateral hernias in 3 cases and discovered a complex hernia (a hernia with more than one defect in the wall) in 2 patient in whom a direct hernia had been diagnosed before the operation. Mean operating time for monolateral operations was significantly longer in group A (p < 0.05). The corresponding figures for bilateral operations were longer in group B (p < 0.01). No intraoperative complications, conversions from TAPP to open repair, postoperative deaths. There were not less pain quicker mobility and shorter period of disability in the laparoscopic group (group A). Ten (15.6%) postoperative complications occurred in group A: local hematoma (6 cases, 9.3%), neuralgias (3 cases, 4.7%), urinary retention (1 case, 1.6%). Eight (12.1%) postoperative complications: hematomas (3 cases, 4.5%), urinary retention (3 cases, 4.5%), neuralgias (2 cases, 3%) occurred in group B. Differences were not significant. The current follow-up period is 36 months (15-54) in median. In both groups no recurrences occurred, but 3 patients in group B who were operated on for monolateral hernia (6.5%) discovered to be affected by contralateral hernia. The results of the present report suggest that TAPP does not appear to be associated with better results in terms of complications, pain or period of disability as compared to open tension free hernia repair, but the ability of the laparoscopic approach to expose otherwise-occult defects eliminated the risk of recurrences due to missed hernias.     

Perioperative transfusion, postoperative infection, and recurrence of head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND: Considering the high recurrence rate after conventional inguinal hernia repair, the totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been used. METHODS: The present experience of the authors embraces 1085 patients with a total of 1717 inguinal hernias, including 200 recurrences. The operative technique is described with emphasis on pitfalls and tricks. RESULTS: Analysis of the data concerning the first 403 patients with 1 year complete follow-up reveals a mean (SEM) operating time of 42 (1.2) min for unilateral and 58 (1.0) min for bilateral hernia repair. Mean (SEM) postoperative hospital stay was 2 (0.04) days. Complication rates during and after operation were 0.3% and 3.3% respectively. The morbidity rate at 1 month after operation was 3.5%. The recurrence rate was 0.3% at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Totally preperitoneal endoscopic inguinal hernia repair is safe and reproducible for any type of primary or recurrent inguinal hernia, even in patients with previous subumbilical surgery or severe systemic disease. Careful follow-up is mandatory to assess the late recurrence rate.     

Management of complicated incisional hernias with underlay-technique implanted polypropylene mesh. An effective technique in French hernia surgery

Incisional hernia repair with conventional techniques (simple closure, Mayo-technique) is associated with unacceptable recurrence rates of 30-50%. Therefore, surgical repair using different prosthetic biomaterials is becoming increasingly popular. Further to favourable results by French hernia surgeons, we studied the results of underlay prosthetic mesh repair using polypropylene mesh in complicated and recurrent incisional hernias. METHOD: After preparation and excision of the entire hernia sac, the posterior rectus sheath is freed from the muscle bellies on both sides. The peritoneum and posterior rectus sheaths are closed with a continuous looped polyglyconate suture. The prosthesis used for midline hernias is positioned on the posterior rectus sheath and extends far beyond the borders of the myoaponeurotic defect. The anterior rectus sheath is closed with a continuous suture. The prosthesis for lumbar and subcostal hernias is placed in a prepared space between the transverse and oblique muscles. Intraperitoneal placement of the mesh must be avoided. RESULTS: Between January 1996 and August 1997 we performed a total of 33 incisional hernia repairs (14 primary hernias, 19 recurrent hernias) using this technique (16 women, 17 men, mean age 56.19 +/- 12.92 years). Local complications occurred in four patients (12%): superficial wound infection (n = 2), postoperative bleeding, requiring reoperation (n = 1), minor hemato-seroma (n = 1). One patient suddenly died on the 3rd post-operative day from severe pulmonary embolism (mortality 3%). Twenty-two patients with a minimum follow up to 6 months were re-examined clinically. The average follow-up time for this group was 9 months (range 6-17 months). To date no recurrent hernias have been observed. There were only minor complaints like "a feeling of tension" in the abdominal wall (n = 3) and slight pain under physical stress (n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: The use of prosthetic mesh should be considered for repair of large or recurrent incisional hernias, especially in high-risk patients (obesity, obstructive lung disease) and complicated hernias. The aforementioned technique of underlay prosthetic repair using polypropylene mesh fixed onto the posterior rectus sheath allows for anatomical and consolidated reconstruction of the damaged abdominal wall with excellent results and low complication rates.     

Inguinal hernia repair with the Shouldice technique

The authors analyze the result of Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in 1000 patients. In a total of 1034 hernias, 966 of them were unilateral and 68 bilateral. The hernias were indirect (61.7%), direct (24.9%) and combined (3.5%). There were 102 recurrent hernias (9.9%) and the mean age of the patients was 50 years. In most cases the patients were male (96.9%) and peasants (47.6%). The post-operative follow-up was annual in 65.8% of the patients, for a period up to 10 years. The recurrence rate was 0.8% in the cases of primary hernias and 4.9% in the case of recurrent ones.     

Risks and benefits of laparoscopic hernia-plasty (TAPP). 5 years experiences with 3,400 hernia repairs

In the present study, for the first time the aspects of risk, benefit and the costs of laparoscopic hernioplasty in the transabdominal technique with preperitoneal placement of a polypropylene mesh are examined prospectively in a very large group of patients with 3,400 hernia repairs. The median operation time was 45 min for unilateral primary hernias, 50 min for unilateral recurrent hernias and 76 min for bilateral hernias. The frequency of complications showed a significant dependence on the individual steps in the development of the method and the individual learning curve. The same is true for the rate of recurrency. Whereas initially the rate of serious complications was 2.75%, the rate of minor complications 11% and the rate of recurrences 4.5% the corresponding figures are at present 0.4%, 4.4% and 0.5%. Laparoscopic hernioplasty proved to be equally as effective in the treatment of primary hernias, recurrent hernias and bilateral hernias. The large number of 11 surgeons participating proves that laparoscopic hernioplasty can be learned and that even in a teaching hospital it can be performed safely, efficiently and cost-effectively.     

Inguinal hernia 1998--an assessment of current status

Hernia surgery has considerably changed in recent years. In the era of minimal invasive surgery classical Shouldice repair has become old-fashioned and is increasingly replaced by tension-free techniques using synthetic mesh material. Currently, Shouldice repair remains the treatment of choice in young patients with small primary hernia. Lichtenstein hernioplasty is indicated in young patients with large hernias, and in those over 35 years of age for any size of hernias. Endoscopic operations are restricted to bilateral primary hernias and recurrent hernias. In future, when used on the basis of a reasonable strategy, the variety of operative procedures offers a chance to improve the results of hernia surgery. Further studies are needed to demonstrate which hernia strategy is most reliable in terms of cost-effectiveness, patient comfort, complication and recurrence rate.     

Inguinal hernia--which method leads to the goal? Endoscopic and open surgical procedures are available

In recent years, the methods available for repair of inguinal hernia have greatly expanding, resulting in confusion as to what constitutes a suitable choice. Is it to be laparoscopy or open surgery, plastic mesh yes or no, general anesthesia or local anesthesia? Bassini's operation has now been ousted by the Shouldice procedure, which is suitable for all primary forms of hernia. The Lichtenstein procedure is readily and rapidly carried out under local anesthesia, making it suitable for use in multimorbid and old patients; the recurrence rate is low. The laparoscopic approach can be recommended for patients who, for private or occupational reasons need to be up and about again as soon as possible. It is also particularly suitable for the treatment of recurrent hernias or for the simultaneous repair of bilateral hernias. Disadvantages are the high costs, a lack of long-term results and unusual complications that are not seen in open surgery.     

Preperitoneal prosthesis implantation in surgical management of recurrent inguinal hernia. Retrospective evaluation of our results 1989-1994

Recurrent inguinal hernia represents a great problem in surgery given the frequency of this operation, with a recurrence rate of 0.5-8%. Re-recurrence after repair without implantation of a prosthesis occurs in 1-23% of cases. We analyzed our results of patients with recurrent inguinal hernia, operated according to the method of Stoppa. Between 1989 and July 1994 there were 58 operations upon 55 patients with an average age of 65 years, 79% of whom had unilateral and 21% bilateral hernias. 89% of all patients underwent surgery because of a recurrent inguinal hernia. A Marlex mesh was used in 79% of the case. All patients were followed up (mean 35 months, minimum 12 months). Early complications consisted in one hematoma (1.7%), which had to be drained, as well as one early recurrence (1.7%). No infections were observed. The overall recurrence rate was 12%. However, 60% of all recurrences occurred in the few first years after introduction of this technique at our clinic; with growing number of operations and experience with Stoppa's technique, we obtained a recurrence rate of 6-7% per year. In our opinion, supported by the results of other studies, Stoppa's technique is a successful method in the treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia.