Grass as a high potential by-product: Buffalo grass to biogas and the increase of system performance and stability

Buffalo grass and alkaline-pretreated buffalo grass samples were co-digested with cow manure separately to generate biogas in anaerobic reactors. The study considered a solid content of 20% (10% buffalo grass and 10% cow manure). The methane (CH₄) content and CH₄ yield of the distinct experiments were compared. For the untreated buffalo grass, the weighed buffalo grass was mixed with cow manure and water. For the alkaline-pretreated buffalo grass, the weighed buffalo grass was soaked in 1% sodium hydroxide for 1 day prior to being mixed with cow manure and water. The untreated and pretreated buffalo grass-manure were fed semi-continuously at the rate of 125 mL/day for five days feeding in a 5 L reactor, with 40 days hydraulic retention time. The experiments were conducted for approximately 100 days. Results were reported when the systems were in steady-state conditions. The chemical oxygen demand (COD) conversion efficiency of co-digestion of the untreated and pretreated buffalo grass-manure were 46.21 and 62.76%, respectively, and for the total volatile solids (TVS) were 68.50 and 71.80%, respectively. The CH₄ contents generated from co-digestion of the untreated and pretreated buffalo grass-manure were 48.32% and 50.36%, respectively. The CH₄ yields generated from co-digestion of the untreated and pretreated buffalo grass-manure were 328 and 385 L/kgTVS conversion, respectively. It was observed from the experiments that pretreatment of the buffalo grass prior to co-digestion provided system stability during biogas production.     

Using sugarcane leaves and tops for exploiting higher methane yields: An assessment study

Sugarcane leaves and tops are lignocellulosic agricultural by-products which are considered a significant input for biogas production. Their potential pretreatment by sodium hydroxide prior to co-digestion with cow manure helps increase the methane (CH₄) content, biodegradation efficiency of the lignocellulosic materials and CH₄ yield. The untreated and pretreated sugarcane leaves and tops to cow manure and water of different ratios were digested and co-digested in the 5 L reactors by semi-continuous operation with hydraulic retention time of 40 days. The pretreated sugarcane leaves and tops to cow manure at the initial prepared ratio of 100 g:100 g, in 800 mL water which was corresponding to the organic loading rate (OLR) of 0.61 kg COD/m³·day was recommended. At this ratio, the chemical oxygen demand and total volatile solids degradation efficiency was 68.80 and 72.52%, respectively, the CH₄ content was 44.52% and the CH₄ yield was 331 L/kg COD degraded. According to the results, there is an average of 3.7% deviation between the practical model based on the thermodynamic balance equations carried out using the Aspen Plus and the experimental study. The highest exergy destruction rate is found at 21 kW where the sugarcane leaves and tops, and cow manure ratio is 100 g:100 g, in 800 mL water. The highest energy and exergy efficiencies of the overall system are calculated as 45.53% and 46.02%, respectively.     

Co-digestion of poultry manure and residues from enzymatic saccharification and dewatering of sugar beet pulp

This study investigates the co-digestion of poultry manure (PM) with sugar beet pulp residues (SBPR) obtained from saccharification and dewatering of sugar beet pulp. The laboratory-scale experiments were conducted under batch and semi-continuous conditions at mesophilic temperatures (35 °C). Batch tests gave specific biogas and methane yields of 590 dm³/kgVS_fed and 423 dm³CH₄/kgVS_fed, respectively for SBPR, whereas the corresponding values for PM were 434 dm³/kgVS_fed and 300 dm³CH₄/kgVS_fed. The co-digestion of PM with SBPR was found to increase biogas and methane yields compared to the manure alone. In semi-continuous reactor experiments, the highest methane yield of 346 dm³ CH₄/kgVS_fed was achieved for the mixture containing poultry manure with 50% SBPR (weight basis) and a solids retention time (SRT) of 20 days. However, when poultry manure was digested as a sole feedstock, the biogas production was inhibited by ammonia, whereas the co-digestion of PM with 25% SBPR was slightly affected by volatile fatty acids, which concentrations exceeded 4000 g/m³.     

Methane and hydrogen sulfide production during co-digestion of forage radish and dairy manure

Forage radish, a winter cover crop, was investigated as a co-substrate to increase biogas production from dairy manure-based anaerobic digestion. Batch digesters (300 cm³) were operated under mesophilic conditions during two experiments (BMP1; BMP2). In BMP1, the effect of co-digesting radish and manure on CH₄ and H₂S production was determined by increasing the mass fraction of fresh above-ground radish in the manure-based co-digestion mixture from 0 to 100%. Results showed that forage radish had 1.5-fold higher CH₄ potential than dairy manure on a volatile solids basis. While no synergistic effect on CH₄ production resulted from co-digestion, increasing the radish fraction in the co-digestion mixture significantly increased CH₄ production. Initial H₂S production increased as the radish fraction increased, but the sulfur-containing compounds were rapidly utilized, resulting in all treatments having similar H₂S concentrations (0.10–0.14%) and higher CH₄ content (48–70%) in the biogas over time. The 100% radish digester had the highest specific CH₄ yield (372 ± 12 L kg⁻¹ VS). The co-digestion mixture containing 40% radish had a lower specific CH₄ yield (345 ± 2 L kg⁻¹ VS) but also showed significantly less H₂S production at start-up and high quality biogas (58% CH₄). Results from BMP2 showed that the radish harvest date (October versus December) did not significantly influence radish C:N mass ratios or CH₄ production during co-digestion with dairy manure. These results suggest that dairy farmers could utilize forage radish, a readily available substrate that does not compete with food supply, to increase CH₄ production of manure digesters in the fall/winter.     

Biomethane Production from co-fermentation of agricultural wastes

Biomethane (CH₄) was recovered from co-digestion process of waste glycerol and banana wastes. The wastes used contain waste glycerol with varying concentrations from 7.5 to 90 g L⁻¹ and banana peel in the range 2.5–10 %w·v⁻¹. The co-substrate mixture ratio was implemented in 0.5 L batch reactor operated at 37 °C and pH 7 for 120 h. The composition of biogas gas and liquid samples (COD, VFA, pH, alkalinity) were analyzed every 12 and 24 h, respectively. The optimum condition to produce CH₄ was found at 7.5 g L⁻¹ waste glycerol mixed with 7.5% banana peel. The highest CH₄ yield and CH₄ production potential were 0.281 m³ kg⁻¹ COD and 652 mL, respectively.     

Effect of CoMo metal loading on H2 and CNTs production from biogas by integrative process

Effect of CoMo metal loading to MgO (1, 5, 30 and 50 wt%) on conversion of biogas by an integrative process was investigated at 900 °C under atmospheric pressure. The integrative process combines the direct methanation of CO₂ in biogas and the CH₄ decomposition to upgrade biogas to CH₄ and decompose to hydrogen and carbon nanotubes. Methane dissociative reaction is governed by the concentration of active metals on the catalyst surface, while DRM reaction is suppressed. The 30 wt%CoMo catalyst shows the optimal loading for production of high-purity H₂ (>90v/v%) and high yield of MWCNTs (2.33 gCNT/gCat-h) with 100%CO₂ conversion and 95%CH₄ conversion. Meanwhile, 1 wt%CoMo catalyst provided the single-walled CNTs with diameter of 2.5 nm, high surface area of 165 m²/g and high graphitization of I_G/I_D = 6.14.     

Green biohydrogen production in a Co-digestion process from mixture of high carbohydrate food waste and cattle/chicken manure digestate

This study was investigated biohydrogen production on the effects of different ratio of food waste to seed digestate and pH value from co-digestion process in anaerobic reactor. The seed digestate was mixture of cattle manure 45%, corn silage 25%, chicken manure 15%, and olive pomace 15% which was collected from the biogas plant in central Italy. It was found that the peaks of total biogas and the biohydrogen productions were 1355 ± 26 and 436 ± 10 mL whereas the biohydrogen yield was 50.4 mL/g-VS (45.8 mL/g-COD) with 43.33% COD removal rate, the bacteria to substrate volatile solids (VS) ratio was 2:1 where seed digestate to food waste was 6:4 under pH 6.5. As a consequence, food waste with a high COD concentration can be adapted C/N ratio by the cattle manure and chicken manure in the seed digestate which resulted in a high biohydrogen production. The food waste co-digestion system mixed with biogas plant digestate is one of approach to increase total biogas production.     

Methane yield of oat husks

The biogas yield of solid manure from dairy cattle depends on its quality and the proportion of excreta and organic litter material contained within. The biogas yield of both faeces and straw is available in literature. Straw is a common litter material of mixed farms. However, straw is scarcely available on dairy farms. Oat husks are appropriate to replace or supplement straw for use as litter material. In this study, the actual methane yield and the total methane potential of oat husks were determined. Based on an optimized test with ground oat husks, the total methane potential resulted from regression and extrapolation of the experimental data. The total methane potential was determined with 242 L_N CH₄ kg⁻¹ VS added. Additionally, the actual methane yield over retention time at a digestion temperature of 37 °C was determined, using untreated oat husks. For 42 days of retention, the methane yield was 202 L_N CH₄ kg⁻¹ VS added at 52% CH₄ content. Results indicate that the methane yield of oat husks reaches the same level as that of straw. The total methane potential is not higher, but digestion of oat husks may proceed faster. Verification of the laboratory results on-farm revealed that the contribution of oat husks to overall methane production of a prototype biogas plant for solid manure might reach up to 80%.     

Predicting the increase of methane yield using alkali pretreatment for weeds prior to co-digestion

The increase was predicted of the methane (CH₄) yield between untreated and pretreated weeds prior to co-digestion with cow dung. The mixed substrate slurry of weed was prepared using a ratio of weed to cow dung to water of 10:10:80, respectively. The total volatile solids (TVS) and total solids (TS) of the mixed substrate slurry of the untreated weeds were the two parameters input in the developed equation. Four types of weeds were used in the test: French weed, para grass, water lettuce, and sedge. The results showed that the % increase in CH₄ yield depended on the ratio of TVS/TS of the mixed substrate slurry of the untreated weeds. The proposed developed equation was Y = 221.05X – 152.46, where X is the initial ratio of TVS/TS of mixed substrate slurry of untreated weed and cow dung, and Y is the % increase in CH₄ yield obtained when the weed is pretreated using 1% sodium hydroxide for 24 hr prior to co-digestion. Water hyacinth was used as the substrate to verify the equation, and the results indicated that the equation performed well. Verification confirmed that the proposed equation successfully provided an accurate (within 10%) prediction of the % increase in CH₄ yield. The equation could be useful in developing pretreatment options for weed co-digestion and environmental management.     

The effect of waste paper on the kinetics of biogas yield from the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth

The effect of waste paper on biogas yield produced by co-digesting fixed amount of cow dung and water hyacinth in five digesters A-E was studied at room temperature. Waste paper was observed to improve biogas yield in digesters B-E with digester A acting as the control. However, as the amount of waste paper increased the biogas yield was observed to decrease. Kinetic model based on first order kinetic was derived to estimate the maximum, ultimate, biogas yield and also the ultimate methane yield from these biomass mixtures. The maximum biogas yield estimated using this model for digesters B-E were 0.282, 0.262, 0.233, and 0.217 lg⁻¹ VS fed with goodness of fit (R²) of 0.995, 0.99, 0.889, and 0.925 respectively, which were obtained by fitting the experimental biogas yield (y_t) against (exp(kt)−1)/exp(kt). The ultimate biogas and methane yield at very low batch solid load were extrapolated to be 0.34 and 0.204 lg⁻¹ VS fed respectively. In essence, the addition of waste paper in the co-digestion of cow dung and water hyacinth can be a feasible means of improving biogas yield and also alternative means of recycling waste paper. Furthermore, the kinetic model developed can compliment other models used in anaerobic digestion of agricultural and solid waste.     

Co-digestion of waste glycerol and glucose to enhance biogas production

Co-digestion in anaerobic fermentation has been widely used to improve biogas production. The biogas production from co-digestion of glucose and glycerol was studied in laboratory-scale batch reactors under mesophilic temperatures, pH 7. The batch experiments involved a variation of glycerol/glucose ratios with initial chemical oxygen demand (COD) for all conditions was fixed at 5,200 mg L⁻¹. The highest yield of biogas production was obtained from glycerol/glucose with 5:5 ratio. The cumulative biogas production was 298.2 mL, and the maximum production rate was 8 mL hr⁻¹. The findings suggested that co-digestion is a potential method to achieve glycerol waste treatment and energy recovery at the same time.     

Low temperature anaerobic digestion of mixtures of llama,cow and sheep manure for improved methane production

Biogas production in anaerobic digestion in farm-scale units is typically performed under mesophilic conditions when used for producing domestic fuel and stabilizing animal waste for the use of digested manure as a fertilizer. Previous studies on the digestion of llama and cow manure have shown the feasibility of producing biogas under altiplano conditions (low pressure and low temperature) and of llama manure as a promising feedstock. The present study concerns the utilization of various mixtures of feedstocks from the Bolivian altiplano under low temperature conditions (18–25 °C). Laboratory scale experiments were performed on the digestion of mixtures of llama, sheep and cow manure in a semi-continuous process using ten 2-L stainless steel digesters to determine the effects of organic loading rate (OLR) and the feed composition. The semi-continuous operation of mixture of llama–cow–sheep manure proved to be a reliable system, which could be operated with good stability. The results suggest that in a system digesting a mixture of llama-cow-sheep manure at low temperature (18–25 °C) the maximum OLR value is between 4 and 6 kg VS m³ d^?1. The methane yields obtained in the mixture experiments were in the range 0.07–0.14 m³ kg^?1 VS added, with a methane concentration in the gas of between 47 and 55%.     

Optimization of mechanical pre-treatment of Laminariaceae spp. biomass-derived biogas

Macroalgae have not met their full potential to date as biomass for the production of energy. One reason is the high cost associated with the pretreatment which breaks the biomass's crystalline structure and better exposes the fermentable sugars to anaerobes. In the attempt to overcome this technological barrier, the performance of a Hollander beater mechanical pretreatment is assessed in this paper. This pretreatment has been applied to a batch of Laminariaceae biomass and inoculated with sludge from a wastewater treatment plant. The derived biogas and methane yields were used as the responses of a complex system in order to identify the optimal system input variables by using the response surface methodology (RSM). The system's inputs considered are the mechanical pretreatment time (5–15 min range), the machine's chopping gap (76–836 μm) and the mesophilic to thermophilic range of temperatures (30–50 °C). The mechanical pretreatment was carried out with the purpose of enhancing the biodegradability of the macroalgal feedstock by increasing the specific surface area available during the anaerobic co-digestion. The pretreatment effects on the two considered responses are estimated, discussed and optimized using the tools provided by the statistical software Design-Expert v.8. The best biogas yield of treated macroalgae was found at 50 °C after 10 min of treatment, providing 52% extra biogas and 53% extra methane yield when compared to untreated samples at the same temperature conditions. The highest biogas rate achieved by treating the biomass was 685 cc gTS⁻¹, which is 430 cc gTS⁻¹ in terms of CH₄ yield.     

Enhanced methane fermentation of municipal sewage sludge by microbial electrochemical systems integrated with anaerobic digestion

Sewage sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant was fed into a microbial electrochemical system, combined with an anaerobic digester (MES-AD), for enhanced methane production and sludge stabilization. The effect of thermally pretreating the sewage sludge on MES-AD performance was investigated. These results were compared to those obtained from control operations, in which the sludge was not pretreated or MES integration was absent. The soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) in the raw sewage sludge after pretreatment was 31% higher than the SCOD in untreated sludge (5804.85 mg/L vs. 4441.46 mg/mL). The methane yield and proportion of methane in biogas generated by the MES-AD were higher than those of the control systems, regardless of the pretreatment process. The maximum methane yield (0.28 L CH₄/g COD) and methane production (1139 mL) were obtained with the MES inoculated with pretreated sewage sludge. Methane yield and production with this system using pretreated sewage were 47% and 56% higher, respectively, than those of the control (0.19 L CH₄/g COD, 730 mL). Additionally, the maximum SCOD removal (89%) and current generation were obtained with the MES inoculated with a pretreated substrate. These results suggested that sewage sludge could be efficiently stabilized with enhanced methane production by synergistic combination of MES-AD system with pretreatment process.     

Fugitive methane emissions from an agricultural biodigester

The use of agricultural biodigesters provides a strategy for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while generating energy. The GHG reduction associated with a biodigester will be affected by fugitive emissions from the facility. The objective of this study was to measure fugitive methane (CH₄) emissions from a Canadian biodigester. The facility uses anaerobic digestion to produce biogas from cattle manure and other organic feedstock, which is burnt to generate electricity (1 MW capacity) and heat. An inverse dispersion technique was used to calculate emissions. Fugitive emissions were related to the operating state of the biodigester, and over four seasonal campaigns the emission rate averaged 3.2, 0.8, and 26.6 kg CH₄ hr⁻¹ for normal operations, maintenance, and flaring periods, respectively. During normal operations the average fugitive emission rate corresponded to 3.1% of the CH₄ gas production rate.     

Biogas production in low-cost household digesters at the Peruvian Andes

Low-cost tubular digesters originally developed in tropical regions have been adapted to the extreme weather conditions of the Andean Plateau (3000-4000 m.a.s.l.). The aim of this study was to characterise biogas production in household digesters located at high altitude, operating under psychrophilic conditions. To this end, two pilot digesters were monitored and field campaigns were carried out in two representative digesters of rural communities. Digesters’ useful volume ranged between 2.4 and 7.5 m³, and hydraulic residence time (HRT) between 60 and 90 days. The temperature inside the digester’s greenhouse ranged between 20 and 25 °C. Treating cow manure, a specific biogas production around 0.35 m³ kg_VS⁻¹ was obtained, with some 65% CH₄ in biogas. In order to fulfil daily requirements for cooking and lighting, biogas production should be enhanced without increasing implementation costs as not to impede the expansion of this technology at household scale. In this sense, HRT below 60 days and OLR above 1 kg_VS m⁻³ day⁻¹ should be investigated to decrease digesters’ volume (i.e. costs) and increase biogas production rate. The adaptation of conventional gas burners to biogas characteristics can also contribute in improving the efficiency of the system.     

Nymphoides peltatum as a novel feedstock for biomethane production via anaerobic co-digestion with waste sludge

Nymphoides peltatum (NP) is exploited as a novel feedstock for biomethane production via anaerobic co-digestion with waste sludge (WS). Batch experiments are conducted under mesophilic condition at NP/WS of 1/3, 2/2, 3/1, 0/4 and 4/0 based on volatile solids (VS). Prior to anaerobic digestion (AD), NP undergoes only natural drying and grinding. The maximum net cumulative methane yield (265.16 mL CH₄·g VS_added^?1) and the highest gross VS removal rate (56.12%) are obtained at NP/WS of 1/3. The kinetic analysis by the modified Gompertz model fit hinted that 28 days is adequate for methane recovery and co-digestion significantly accelerates the digestion rate. Synergetic effect is corroborated to exist in co-digestion due to amiable conditions in term of total ammonia nitrogen, free ammonia, pH, volatile fatty acids and total alkalinity. High-throughput 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals that Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Methanosarcina and Methanosaeta are conducive to AD of NP.     

Hydrogen and methane production from untreated rice straw and raw sewage sludge under thermophilic anaerobic conditions

Bioenergy produced from co-digestion of sewage sludge (SS) and rice straw (RS) as raw materials, without pretreatment and additional nutrients, was compared for the one-stage system for producing methane (CH₄) and the two-stage system for combined production of hydrogen (H₂) and CH₄ in batch experiments under thermophilic conditions. In the first stage H₂ fermentation process using untreated RS with raw SS, we obtained a high H₂ yield (21 ml/g-VS) and stable H₂ content (60.9%). Direct utilization of post-H₂ fermentation residues readily produced biogas, and significantly enhanced the CH₄ yield (266 ml/g-VS) with stable CH₄ content (75–80%) during the second stage CH₄ fermentation process. Overall, volatile solids removal (60.4%) and total bioenergy yield (8804 J/g-VS) for the two-stage system were 37.9% and 59.6% higher, respectively, than the one-stage system. The efficient production of bioenergy is believed to be due to a synergistically improved second stage process exploiting the well-digested post-H₂ generation residues over the one-stage system.     

Sustainability accounting for the construction and operation of a plant‐scale solar‐biogas heating system based on emergy analysis

Domestic heating systems have long been playing a significant role in China's energy structure. The sustainability of a hybrid solar‐biogas heating system (SBHS) under various feedstock fermentation scenarios was evaluated using emergy analysis. Representative emergy indices such as transformities, emergy yield ratio (EYR), environmental loading ratio (ELR), emergy sustainability index (ESI), ratio of waste treatment (%W), feedback yield ratio (FYR), and emission mitigation intensity (EMI; g/10¹⁰ sej) were selected to evaluate the sustainability performance of different feedstock scenarios including cow dung (CD), swine manure (SM), and poultry manure (PM). The results showed that PM fermentation scenario had greater market competitiveness, lower environmental pressure, better sustainability, and self‐organizing ability than the other two options. However, both the emergy efficiency and the CO₂ emissions mitigation intensity of PM scenario were worse than that of the SM and CD. Moreover, compared with other biogas systems and traditional agricultural systems, the hybrid SBHS was proved to be a promising mode for the treatment of rural manure waste with favorable economic benefits and environmental sustainability.     

Anaerobic co-digestion technology in solid wastes treatment for biomethane generation

Anaerobic co-digestion is considered to be an efficient way of disposing solid wastes which can not only reduce environmental burden, but also produce bioenergy. Co-digestion of solid wastes in the absence of bacteria inoculums with variable mixing ratios of three wastes has been experimentally tested for 35 days digestion time to determine the biogas potential. The temperature remained relatively constant at a mesophilic range of 29–36°C throughout the study. An average pH of 7.4 was recorded from all digesters. The average biogas yields obtained from the four digesters (D1, D2, D3 and D4) were 13.31, 15.67, 16.52 and 19.12 L/day, respectively. The cumulative result showed that from co-digestion of D4 43.67%, 22.02% and 15.71% more biogas was produced, respectively, than others. The maximum and average COD reduction was 57% and 31%, respectively, in co-digestion wastes. The biogas comprised average of 61% CH₄, 33.5% CO₂, 222 ppm H₂S, and 4.7% H₂O, respectively.