共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
金属表面无铬替代处理技术的研究进展 总被引:9,自引:6,他引:3
金属表面铬酸盐转化膜不仅具有优异的耐腐蚀性能,还具有自我修复功能,但是环保的需要使得铬酸盐钝化工艺将逐渐被各种无铬钝化无毒技术所替代。介绍了硅酸盐、钼酸盐、稀土复合转化膜、有机硅烷等各种无铬钝化工艺的优缺点和发展现状。并指出了今后金属表面处理无铬无毒钝化的方向。 相似文献
2.
无铬复合钝化膜的微观组织结构及耐腐蚀性能 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
目的解决热镀锌钢板表面六价铬钝化工艺所产生的环境污染问题。方法以钼酸铵、纳米硅溶胶、单宁酸、硅烷偶联剂KH151和KH792为主要原料配制新型环保的无铬复合钝化液,在镀锌板表面制备钝化膜。采用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、能谱仪(EDS)和X射线光电子能谱仪(XPS)分析无铬复合钝化膜表面的微观形貌、元素组成和化学成分,用电化学工作站测试Mo元素对镀锌板耐蚀性的影响,使用中性盐雾实验研究不同皮模量时膜层的耐蚀性。结果无铬复合钝化膜中的Mo元素可以抑制微裂纹的产生和发展,阻挡腐蚀性介质向金属基体扩散,提高复合硅烷膜的电阻。复合钝化膜的电化学交流阻抗比硅烷钝化膜提高了1.6倍,与六价铬钝化膜接近,可以有效抑制腐蚀电化学反应的发生,降低反应速度,提高膜层的耐蚀性。皮膜量为892 mg/m2时,膜层的腐蚀面积为0,耐蚀性达到六价铬钝化膜水平;皮膜量为1252 mg/m2时,耐蚀性能优异。结论制备的无铬复合钝化膜结合了硅烷钝化膜和钼酸盐钝化膜两方面的优点,提高了膜层的致密性和结合性,膜层耐腐蚀性接近/达到了六价铬钝化的效果。 相似文献
3.
4.
5.
6.
镀锌层三价铬钝化工艺的研究 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
对热镀锌层上采用三价铬盐和三价铬盐加丙稀酸树脂两种钝化液钝化,探讨钝化液浓度、pH、钝化处理温度和时间对膜层耐腐蚀性能的影响。确定其钝化工艺,以取代六价铬盐钝化。试验结果表明,三价铬钝化液的最佳组分是将CrO3还原为三价铬,HNO3为氧化剂,硫酸和硼酸为添加剂。三价铬加丙烯酸树脂钝化液是以Cr2(SO4)3为主盐,次磷酸钠为络合剂,HNO3为氧化剂,硫酸和硼酸为添加剂,再加入与水的最佳体积比为1∶3的丙烯酸树脂为最佳组成。采用三价铬盐或三价铬加丙稀酸树脂钝化均可推迟镀锌层出现白锈的时间,三价铬加丙烯酸树脂钝化液效果更好。 相似文献
7.
近年来,随着人们对工艺环保的关注程度逐渐增强,最初的六价铬酸盐蓝白钝化工艺已经逐渐被三价铬蓝白钝化工艺所取代,三价铬毒性较小,大约为六价铬的1/100,比六价铬更易于处理,且六价铬钝化层中就是以三价铬离子为骨架成膜的,所以三价铬钝化是替代六价铬钝化极好的选择.在此进程中,国内外科技工作者开发出一些无毒的、环保型的 相似文献
8.
9.
机械镀锌镀层钝化与耐蚀性能研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
对机械镀锌层分别用三价铬、稀土和六价铬进行了钝化处理,利用盐雾试验和电化学测试对不同钝化膜的耐蚀性与电化学行为进行了比较研究.盐雾试验结果表明,稀土与三价铬钝化处理的效果均已超过传统的六价铬钝化,比六价铬钝化膜的耐蚀性提高了一倍以上;稀土钝化膜的耐蚀性最好,三价铬钝化膜的耐蚀性仅次于稀土钝化膜的.电化学测试表明,三价铬、稀土和六价铬钝化膜都能够不同程度地抑制腐蚀的阴极电极反应,抑制阴极反应程度最大的是稀土钝化膜,其次是三价铬钝化膜,最小的是六价铬钝化膜.三价铬与稀土钝化工艺的环保和良好的防腐效果使其具有良好的应用前景. 相似文献
10.
11.
取代铬酸盐钝化处理工艺的动向 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
六价铬对人体、特别是对皮肤会造成伤害而成为环境问题,现在铬酸钝化膜,特别是镀锌层的铬酸盐钝化膜在欧洲已经受到限制。本文对铬酸盐钝化膜的性能以及所进行的以三价铬盐或无铬盐取代铬盐钝化的开发状况加以解说。 相似文献
12.
热镀锌板三价铬钝化剂的制备及其钝化膜耐蚀性能 总被引:4,自引:2,他引:2
目的制备钝化膜耐蚀性良好的热镀锌板三价铬钝化剂。方法以铬酸酐、酒石酸盐、无机混酸、纳米硅溶胶为原料,制备三价铬钝化剂。采用该钝化剂对热镀锌板进行钝化处理,通过中性盐雾试验、Tafel极化曲线和交流阻抗谱分析钝化膜的耐蚀性能,并表征钝化膜的表面形貌和元素组成。结果钝化镀锌板经120 h中性盐雾试验后,腐蚀面积仅为5%。与未钝化镀锌板相比,钝化试样的自腐蚀电位有所正移,自腐蚀电流密度降低了约2个数量级。钝化膜表面较为平整,有少量白色颗粒沉积,膜中主要含有C,O,Si,Cr,Zn等元素,且Cr主要以三价和六价存在,Zn以二价存在。结论该三价铬钝化剂可提高镀锌板的耐蚀性能,具有较好的工业使用推广价值。 相似文献
13.
14.
15.
Gang Kong Jintang Lu Shuanghong Zhang Chunshan Che Haijiang Wu 《Surface & coatings technology》2010,205(2):545-550
Two types of molybdate/silane composite films were obtained on the surface of hot-dip galvanized steel sheets by either directly immersing in a solution containing silane and molybdate as additive (single-step process), or firstly immersing in a molybdate solution, then in a silane solution (two-step process). The chemical compositions and microstructures of the films were examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) and reflection absorption infrared spectroscopy (RAIR). The corrosion resistances were investigated by electrochemical measurements and neutral salt spray (NSS) test. The results showed that the molybdate/silane composite film formed in the single-step process had a similar double-layer structure as that obtained in the two-step process. The inner layer was composed mainly of the elements O, Mo, Zn, and P, similar to the single molybdate film; whereas the outer layer was composed mainly of the elements C, O and Si, similar to the single silane film. Compared with the single molybdate or silane film, the corrosion current of the composite films was reduced and the impedance of the films was increased. Accordingly, the corrosion resistance of the composite films was remarkably enhanced to a level which was comparable to or even surpassing that of the conventional chromate passivation film. 相似文献
16.
Commercially available passivation methods for white-rust protection of hot-dip galvanized steel have been investigated. The passivations were either based on trivalent chromium or chromium free. A chromate based conversion coating was used for reference. The treated panels were tested with regard to white rust protection and paintability. The surface chemistry of the conversion coatings was monitored with scanning Auger electron spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Coating thicknesses were measured using Auger electron sputter depth profiling.The passivations were applied with a thickness recommended by the supplier and thus showed large variation. The thickness of the chromium free passivation (Cr-free) is approximately 75 nm. The coating contains the active ions; H3O+, Ti4+, Mn2+, Zn2+, PO43−. The passivation based on trivalent chromium (Cr-III) is approximately 30 nm thick and contains the active ions; H3O+ Cr3+, PO43−, F. The chromate based passivation (Cr-VI) is approximately 5 nm thick and contains the active ions Cr6+/Cr3+, F−.The Cr-free and the Cr-III passivations showed similar white rust protection in the corrosion tests. The corrosion resistance was good although it did not fully reach the level of the Cr-VI passivation. The results from the tests of the painted panels showed that the powder paint worked well on all three passivations. The solvent born paint worked best on the passivation based on trivalent chromium. The water born paint showed poor resistance to blistering in the Cleveland humidity test for all three passivations. In this test the passivation with hexavalent chromium showed slightly better results than the chromate free passivations. 相似文献
17.
18.