Biodistribution studies on L-3-[fluorine-18]fluoro-alpha-methyl tyrosine: a potential tumor-detecting agent

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate a clinical algorithm that predicts nodal status in patients with prostate cancer and to assess the impact on the outcome. METHODS: Between September 1988 and December 1994, 192 patients with organ-confined prostate cancer and considered surgical candidates for radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) were stratified using the algorithm: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 20 ng/mL or less, Gleason score 7 or lower, and clinical Stage T2a or lower. Patients failing any of these criteria were placed in the high-risk group and underwent a pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patients who satisfied all the criteria were placed in the low-risk group and underwent RPP without evaluation of the pelvic lymph nodes. Another contemporaneous cohort of patients (n = 65) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) without use of the algorithm and were used as a control group. Patients were monitored for at least 24 months. RESULTS: In the RPP group, 177 patients were considered low risk according to the algorithm and were not offered staging lymphadenectomy before surgery, whereas 15 patients were categorized as high risk for metastasis and underwent staging lymphadenectomy. In the RRP and lymphadenectomy group, 41 patients were considered at low risk and 24 at high risk of disease spread according to the algorithm. In the RPP group, low-risk patients (no lymphadenectomy) had a PSA recurrence rate (27%) similar to that of low-risk patients in the RRP group with negative lymph nodes (29%), P = 0.8. Similarly, high-risk patients with negative lymph nodes in both groups had a similar recurrence rate (53% for RPP and 50% for RRP). Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that PSA was the most significant predictor for disease recurrence (P = 0.0004) followed by preoperative Gleason scores (P = 0.02) and clinical stages (P = 0.03). Multivariate stepwise analysis demonstrated that Gleason score and clinical stage did not add to the prediction of recurrence over PSA alone. CONCLUSIONS: Staging lymphadenectomy can be omitted in low-risk patients without deleterious effects on the outcome as measured by PSA recurrence.     

Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence

OBJECTIVES: Urinary incontinence is a significant complication of radical pelvic surgery. A better understanding of the neuroanatomy of the rhabdosphincter has led to the modification of the radical retropubic prostatectomy to optimize the recovery of postoperative urinary control. METHODS: Mock radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed on fresh cadavers to determine which surgical maneuvers could injure what may be the continence nerves. To assess the clinical significance of modifying the radical retropubic prostatectomy based on these anatomic studies, a contemporary series of 60 consecutive patients who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy with continence nerve preservation was compared with a control group of 38 consecutive patients who had a standard anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: At the level of the prostatic apex, both the pelvic and pudendal nerves gave intrapelvic branches that bilaterally coursed to the external urinary sphincter to enter at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions. The mock radical prostatectomy revealed that the nerves to the external urinary sphincter were most prone to injury when a right angle clamp was used to develop a plane between the posterior rhabdosphincter and anterior rectum and if the urethral anastomotic sutures were placed at the 5 and 7 o'clock positions. In addition, blunt dissection of the tips of the seminal vesicles injured the inferior hypogastric plexus. Modifications to preserve the continence nerves were incorporated in the anatomic radical prostatectomy. Although overall continence rates were similar for the two groups (98.3% for continence nerve-preserving radical prostatectomy versus 92. 1% for standard prostatectomy), continence nerve preservation decreased the time to achieve continence. CONCLUSIONS: During radical retropubic prostatectomy, surgical maneuvers that avoid injury to the continence nerves resulted in the more rapid return of urinary control.     

Pathologic features and clinical outcome after anatomic radical prostatectomy by transcoccygeal approach

OBJECTIVES: A nonrandomized prospective study was conducted aimed at verifying the clinical outcome and pathologic features of a group of patients submitted to transcoccygeal radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Radical transcoccygeal prostatectomy was performed at our institution in 26 patients after laparoscopic (24 cases) or open surgical (2 cases) pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eighteen patients were selected because they were considered to be at risk for nodal metastases on the basis of preoperative staging (prostate-specific antigen level of 20 ng/mL or greater and/or Gleason score greater than 5); the remaining 8 manifested incidental prostate carcinoma. RESULTS: Intraoperative complications included rectal injury in 1 patient (3.8%) and massive blood loss in another. Transitory leakage at the site of the urethrovesical anastomosis and urethrorectal fistula occurred postoperatively in 2 patients. The rate of positive surgical margins was 26.9%. The mean follow-up time is 27 months (range 3 to 39 months). Total urinary continence was obtained in 21 patients (80.8%); 5 patients (19.2%) still require urinary pads. Four patients (15.4%) have experienced tumor recurrence evidenced only by increased serum prostate-specific antigen levels. Local tumor recurrence with positive biopsy of the urethrovesical junction was diagnosed in 3 patients (11.5%), and 1 (3.8%) experienced systemic tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Radical transcoccygeal prostatectomy is a safe procedure for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer, both from a clinical and a pathologic point of view. Operative complication as well as pathologic features and clinical outcome reported in this series of patients must be related to selection criteria used in most cases. The exact role of radical transcoccygeal prostatectomy in the clinical setting has yet to be defined. According to these preliminary results, radical transcoccygeal prostatectomy should be further investigated in the treatment of incidental carcinoma after transurethral resection of the prostate or suprapubic prostatectomy and could become an elective indication in such cases.     

HpSS: a new silver staining method for Helicobacter pylori

Fifty-seven patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated by radical prostatectomy or external radiation therapy following pelvic lymphadenectomy. Comparing the outcome of radiotherapy with that of prostatectomy in 42 T2 patients without lymph node metastasis, the 5-year cause-specific survival did not differ between the radical prostatectomy group (n = 31) and radiotherapy group (n = 11). The 5-year disease-free survival of the prostatectomy group, however, was superior to that of radiotherapy group (p = 0.01). To cure patients with T2 prostate cancer, therefore, it is supposed that radical prostatectomy should be performed. To improve the treatment outcome after radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery for prostate cancer has been attempted in our institution. Phantom experiments using a linear accelerator demonstrated a round dose distribution, and high reproducibility of prostate positioning was confirmed by CT when a thermoplastic immobilization device was used to fix the pelvis. In one patient with localized prostate cancer treated by radiosurgery, acute complication has not been recognized during the 5 week follow-up. Radiosurgery may be available to treat clinically localized prostate cancer.     

Immunoepidemiology of Dracunculus medinensis infections I. Antibody responses in relation to infection status

OBJECTIVES: The sites of recurrent carcinoma of the prostate were localized with radiolabeled monoclonal antibody, and these sites were correlated with the response of patients treated with pelvic radiation after prostatectomy. METHODS: Radionuclide scans were performed with indium 111-labeled CYT-356, a monoclonal antibody that binds to prostate epithelial cells, in 48 men diagnosed with recurrent carcinoma detected by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening after radical retropubic prostatectomy. RESULTS: In 48 patients with recurrent carcinoma detected by PSA screening following radical retropubic prostatectomy, 73% had monoclonal antibody activity beyond the prostatic fossa, and only 3 patients (6%) had activity in the prostatic fossa alone; 65% had monoclonal antibody activity in pelvic lymph nodes despite the fact that lymph node dissections were pathologically negative at the time of prostatectomy in 90% of the patients; and 23% of patients had monoclonal antibody activity in abdominal and extrapelvic retroperitoneal nodes. Of 48 patients, 13 underwent external beam radiation therapy after monoclonal antibody scans. Six patients had scans showing activity beyond the field of radiation, and radiation therapy failed in 4 of these patients. Seven patients had scans with no activity beyond the field of radiation therapy, and radiation therapy failed in only 2 of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The scans frequently show monoclonal antibody uptake in pelvic, abdominal, and extrapelvic retroperitoneal sites beyond the region of limited obturator node dissections and may account for the understaging and subsequent failure of radical prostatectomy in some patients. The monoclonal antibody scan seems to be a good predictor of which patients will respond to radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy, but because these patients often have nodal activity beyond the radiated field, this initial response may not be curative.     

Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE: During radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer tumor at the surgical margin is a relatively frequent finding. We summarize the literature on the incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The literature was reviewed for data on positive margins during radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. RESULTS: Positive surgical margins may result from artifacts induced by tissue processing, incising inadvertently into the prostate or incising into extraprostatic tumor that has extended beyond the limits of resection. Patients with 10 ng./ml. or greater preoperative prostate specific antigen, biopsy Gleason score 7, multiple positive biopsies, or clinical stage T2b, T2c or T3 cancer have a higher risk of positive margins. Preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging may be useful in staging a select group of patients. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation reduces the incidence of positive margins but does not appear to delay progression or improve survival. The surgical approach, retropubic or perineal, may influence the location and etiology of positive margins. In general, nerve and bladder neck sparing procedures do not compromise tumor removal in appropriately selected patients. Positive margins increase the risk of progression and correlate with decreased cancer specific and overall survival. There is no consensus on the management of positive margins. External beam radiation and androgen deprivation may be administered as adjuvant therapy or at the time of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor at the specimen edge is an adverse prognostic factor. With appropriate patient selection and meticulous surgical technique some positive margins can be prevented. Controlled prospective randomized studies of postoperative therapy are needed before definitive recommendations can be made for treating positive margins.     

Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques

PURPOSE: We compared the results of extended (obturator, hypogastric, common and external iliac nodes) to modified (obturator and hypogastric nodes only) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 189 patients with stage T1 to T3 prostate cancer underwent modified (150) or extended (39) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for pelvic nodal assessment before definitive treatment. RESULTS: Twice as many lymph nodes were removed via extended than modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (mean 17:8 versus 9.3). The overall positivity rate was 23 of 189 lymph nodes (12.2%), including 14 of 150 (7.3%) for modified and 9 of 39 (23.1%) for extended dissection (p = 0.02). Two patients (22%) who underwent extended dissection had positive lymph nodes in the external iliac area. Patients who presented with the high risk features of prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater, or stage T2b disease or greater had a 26.5% (p = 0.0002), 22% (p = 0.0006) or 16.4% (p = 0.003) likelihood of positive lymph nodes, respectively. For extended versus modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection node positivity in high risk patients was 27% versus 18.8% (p = 0.4), 30 versus 26.4% (p = 0.8) and 25.4 versus 14.6% (p = 0.17) for Gleason score 7 or greater, PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. and disease stage T2b to T3a, respectively. Patients who underwent the extended procedure had a higher complication rate (35.9 versus 2%, p < 0.0001). No laparotomy was required. CONCLUSIONS: Despite yielding a 2-fold higher node count and higher node positivity rate, extended laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection offers no advantage over modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for diagnosing positive lymph nodes when results are analyzed by prognostic factors. The extended procedure is associated with a much higher complication rate. In patients with the high risk features of PSA greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater and stage T2b to T3a disease modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed safely and effectively to help identify those who may benefit most from curative therapy.     

Selection of patients for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical prostatectomy: a decision analysis

Indications for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical prostatectomy have not been established. Criteria to predict lymph node metastases were derived from the preoperative evaluations of 164 prostate cancer patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy. Decision analysis was used to determine which criteria would be optimal indicators for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to intended radical prostatectomy. Besides a digital rectal examination suggesting uncontained tumor, which was the best indication for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy, the most useful criteria were sonographic tumor volume > or = 3 cc and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > or = 20 ng/mL. If either parameter was met, the sensitivity for identifying patients with pelvic lymph node metastases was 88 percent and the positive predictive value was 42 percent. When both were met, the sensitivity fell to 47 percent but the positive predictive value increased to 67 percent. A combination of Gleason biopsy score and PSA was the best criterion that was independent of transrectal ultrasonography. Using a PSA > or = 15 ng/mL for tumors with Gleason biopsy score > or = 7 or a PSA > or = 25 ng/mL for tumors with a Gleason biopsy score of 5-6 had a sensitivity of 71 percent and positive predictive value of 48 percent for identifying patients with pelvic lymph node metastases. In selecting patients for laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy prior to radical retropubic prostatectomy, criteria with a positive predictive value greater than 39 percent maximize the utility of laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. Prior to radical perineal prostatectomy, laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy will identify pelvic lymph node metastases that would otherwise be undetected by prostatectomy alone. The sensitivity of selection criteria, therefore, should be increased, as long as the positive predictive value remains above 20 percent.     

Hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy: a 3-year followup

PURPOSE: Hormonal treatment administered before radical prostatectomy has been shown to decrease the rate of positive surgical margins. We determine whether preoperative hormonal treatment has any impact on the subsequent failure rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 122 patients with stages T1bNxM0 to T3aNxM0, grades 1 to 3 prostate cancer, including 64 randomly assigned to immediate radical retropubic prostatectomy and 58 randomly assigned to radical retropubic prostatectomy preceded by 3 months of pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. We performed intention to treat analysis on the data with failure defined as lymph node involvement, serum prostate specific antigen greater than 0.5 ng./ml., or the need for postoperative hormonal or radiation adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The positive margin rate was 23.6 versus 45.5% in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy versus prostatectomy only groups (p = 0.016). There were 20 failures (34.5%) in the pretreatment plus prostatectomy subgroup and 26 (40.6%) in the prostatectomy only group (p = 0.48). A negative surgical margin was associated with a significantly lower risk of progression than a positive surgical margin (20.8 versus 50.0%, p = 0.0016), and progression was delayed by approximately 1 year after hormonal pretreatment. However, at a median followup of 38 months there was no difference in progression-free survival (p = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS: Although hormonal pretreatment significantly decreased the positive margin rate, it did not result in any difference in progression-free survival when followup exceeded 3 years. Thus, our current results do not support the routine administration of hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy.     

Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions

PURPOSE: We compare the incidence of positive surgical margins in patients who underwent perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy for clinically localized (stage T1, T2) prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, nonrandomized study we reexamined the specimens of 94 consecutive patients who underwent radical perineal (48) or retropubic (46) prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer (stage T1, T2) and with pathological stage pT2 (intracapsular), pT3A (established extracapsular extension without positive margins) or pT3B (extracapsular extension with positive margins) without lymph node involvement (N0). We assessed the presence or absence of extracapsular cancer with or without positive margins, incisions of the prostatic capsule exposing cancer (surgically induced positive margins) or benign glandular tissue. Patients were followed for 3 to 66 months (mean 25) using an ultrasensitive prostate specific antigen assay with a lower detection limit of less than 0.05 ng./ml. RESULTS: The overall incidence of positive margins in cancer tissue was 56% in the perineal and 61% in the retropubic group, and biochemical failure-free survival was 67% each. However, surgically induced positive margins in patients with organ confined disease were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (43 versus 29%, p < 0.05) and associated with a 37% risk of biochemical failure (prostate specific antigen greater than 0.1 ng./ml.) at mean followup. In addition, capsular incisions exposing benign tissue were more frequent in the perineal than retropubic group (90 versus 37%, p < 0.05) irrespective of pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS: Although overall positive margins and biochemical failure rates are similar or identical for the perineal and retropubic approaches for organ confined prostate cancer, the perineal approach is associated with a significantly higher risk of capsular incisions and surgically induced positive margins and, thus, a higher risk of biochemical failure.     

Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence and severity of vesical neck strictures and urinary incontinence after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) for prostate cancer. METHODS: Between August 1983 and December 1991, 481 consecutive patients underwent RRP by 1 of 2 senior surgeons. Strictures were treated by passing a urethral sound. Incontinence was measured by asking patients for a daily "pad count" of pads required to control urinary leakage. Results were compared to patient age, tumor volume, number of neurovascular bundles spared, preoperative urinary complaints, and previous transurethral resection of the prostate. RESULTS: Of 456 patients with adequate follow-up to determine stricture formation, 82.5% had no strictures, 6.8% required a single dilation, 3.7% required 2 dilations, 3.1% required 3 dilations, and 3.9% required more than 3 dilations. Risk of stricture formation was unrelated to every variable studied. Of 458 patients with adequate follow-up to determine recovery of continence, 80.1% required no pads, 8.1% required 1 to 2 pads a day, 6.6% required 3 to 5 pads a day, and 5.2% were totally incontinent 1 year or more after surgery. Incontinence was closely associated with postoperative urinary urgency. CONCLUSIONS: Strictures are a common but easily managed complication of RRP for prostate cancer. Despite substantial surgical experience, we report a somewhat higher rate of postoperative incontinence than other recently reported series. Our experience is more closely matched by published surveys of patient-reported complications after RRP.     

Effects of 17 beta estradiol on the metabolism of labelled arachidonic acid in uteri isolated from intact and ovariectomized rats. Influence of a restricted diet

Of the 69 patients with clinical stage C prostate cancer under 75 years old and with good performance status between 1986 and 1995, 29 underwent radical prostatectomy combined with endocrine therapy, 21 underwent radiation therapy combined with endocrine therapy and remaining 19 patients were treated by endocrine therapy alone. The median followup was 44 months (range 4 to 122). Radical prostatectomy resulted in progression-free rates of 79% and 61% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Progression-free rates were lower in patients with lymph node metastasis or positive surgical margins. In patients with clinical stage T3a-c and well or moderately differentiated tumor, radical prostatectomy resulted in a progression-free rate of 100% at 5 years. However, in patients with clinical stage T4a or poorly differentiated tumor, radiation therapy resulted in a better progression-free rate than radical prostatectomy. These findings suggest that patients with clinical stage T3a-c and well or moderately differentiated tumor will benefit from radical prostatectomy combined with endocrine therapy and that radiation therapy well be effective for advanced diseases.     

Progression in and survival of patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (T3) treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy

PURPOSE: We determine the progression and survival rates in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant treatment, and investigate subgroups of patients who may not benefit from this treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radical prostatectomy was performed in 83 patients with T3 prostate cancer. The patients were divided in subgroups with T3G1 to 2 and T3G3 tumors, which were evaluated for clinical progression, local recurrence, distant metastases, biochemical progression, and overall and cancer specific survival at 5 and 10 years by Kaplan-Meier curves. The results were compared to those of 190 patients with locally confined tumors. RESULTS: At 5 and 10 years overall survival was 75 and 60%, and cancer specific survival was 85 and 72%, respectively. At 5 and 10 years clinical progression was 41 and 69%, local recurrence 18 and 44%, and distant metastases 31 and 50%, respectively. Biochemical progression at 5 years was 71%. Patients with poorly differentiated tumors showed significantly lower survival and higher progression rates compared to those with well or moderately differentiated tumors. Progression and survival in patients with T3G1-2 tumor were not significantly different from those for patients with locally confined tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic prostate cancer (T3) produces acceptable results in those with well or moderately differentiated tumors. The results of progression and survival are not significantly different from those in patients with locally confined prostate cancer. However, patients with poorly differentiated tumors (T3G3) have early progression and need adjuvant treatment following surgery.     

Pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in selected patients with carcinoma of the prostate: development of a system of patient selection

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of pelvic lymph node metastases in men with clinically localized prostate cancer has decreased dramatically over the past decade, possibly due to efforts at early detection. With a significantly lower incidence of pelvic node involvement, it may be possible to identify a segment of patients for whom pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) may be omitted. This study was conducted to develop a method to select patients for whom PLND could be omitted. METHODS: We analyzed serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and final pathologic stage in 481 men with clinically localized prostate cancer. These variables were compared to the risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis determined that combining all three variables provided the best determination of final pathologic stage. A series of probability curves have been created to estimate the risk of positive lymph nodes in a given patient. Based on the distribution of patients in this study and using these probability functions, PLND could be avoided in up to 50% of patients with localized prostate cancer diagnosed by contemporary methods. CONCLUSIONS: In properly selected patients, pelvic lymphadenectomy can be omitted in the staging and treatment of localized prostate cancer.     

Impact of androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy for T1, T2 prostate cancer on the likelihood of curative surgery

BACKGROUND: Extracapsular extension is commonly seen in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer due to understaging of disease. One possible approach to reduce the likelihood of extracapsular disease is androgen deprivation prior to radical prostatectomy, neoadjuvant therapy. However, adequate application is not clear. We analyzed the outcome of neoadjuvant therapy and radical prostatectomy in an attempt to expand our understanding on indications of neoadjuvant therapy. METHODS: Forty-six selected patients with clinical T1 or T2 prostate cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-two patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy (group N) that mainly consists of LH-RH agonist. The duration of neoadjuvant therapy, varied from 1 to 12 months with the mean being 4 months. Twenty-four underwent radical prostatectomy alone (group S). RESULTS: In the group N and group S, 59% and 33% had either organ confined disease (OCD) or specimen confined disease (SCD) respectively. When the patients had OCD or SCD, they were defined as surgically cured patients. In the patients with clinical stage T1b, T1c, and T2 disease, likelihood of surgical cure were 100%, 50%, 46.7% in group N, 100%, 20%, 11%, in group S respectively. In the patients with initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml and more than 10.1 ng/ml, likelihood of surgical cure were 83.3% and 50% in group N, 63.6% and 15.4% in group S, respectively. Likelihood of surgical cure was higher in the patients with well differentiated carcinoma both in group N and group S. All the patients with serum PSA less than 0.1 ng/ml after neoadjuvant therapy had OCD. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvent therapy could be beneficial either in the patients with moderately or in the poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of prostate especially in the group with initial serum PSA more than 10.1 ng/ml. However, in patients both with well differentiated adenocarcinoma and the initial serum PSA less than 10 ng/ml, no evidence of beneficial effect on the likelihood of OCD or SCD was observed. PSA after neoadjuvant therapy could be useful predictor for the pathological outcome.     

Reduced space hidden Markov model training

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends in the clinical stage and pathologic outcome of patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy at a large referral practice during the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing era. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1987 and June 1995, 5,568 patients with prostate cancer (4,774 with clinically localized disease of stage T2c or less) underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy at our institution. Patient age, preoperative serum PSA level, clinical stage, pathologic stage, Gleason score, and tumor ploidy were assessed. Outcome was based on clinical and PSA (increases in PSA level of 0.2 ng/mL or more) progression-free survival. RESULTS: Patient age (65 to 63 years old; P<0.001) and serum PSA level (median, 8.4 to 6.8 ng/mL; P<0.001) decreased during the study period. The percentage of patients with clinical stage T1c prostate cancer increased from 2.1% in 1987 to 36.4% in 1995 (P<0.001), and clinical stage T3 cancer decreased from 25.3% to 6.5% (P<0.001). Nondiploid tumors decreased from 38.3% to 24.6% (P<0.001), and the proportion of patients with pathologically organ-confined disease increased from 54.9% to 74.3% (P<0.001). More cT1c than cT2 tumors were diploid (80% versus 72%; P<0.001), had a Gleason score of 7 or less (75% versus 65%; P<0.001), and were confined to the prostate (75% versus 57%; P<0.001). Five-year progression-free survival was 85% and 76% for patients with clinical stage T1c and T2, respectively (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Since the advent of PSA testing, patients referred to our institution for radical prostatectomy have shown a significant migration to lower-stage, less-nondiploid, more often organ-confined prostate cancer at the time of initial assessment. Cancer-free survival associated with PSA-detected cancer (cT1c) is superior to that with palpable tumors (cT2). Whether these trends translate into improved long-term cancer-specific survival remains to be confirmed with longer follow-up.     

Randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing radical prostatectomy alone and neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Canadian Urologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: A prospective, multicenter, randomized study was done to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal decreases the incidence of positive margins following radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Observations were made of 213 patients randomized to undergo radical prostatectomy alone (101) or to receive a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily followed by surgery (112). Groups were similar at baseline in terms of clinical stage, serum prostate specific antigen and Gleason score. Of 192 patients available for efficacy analysis 9 had stage T1b, 8 stage T1c, 63 stage T2a, 36 stage T2b and 76 stage T2c disease. RESULTS: One or more positive surgical margins were found in 59 of 91 patients (64.8%) in the surgery only group compared to 28 of 101 (27.7%) in the cyproterone acetate group (p = 0.001). Patients who received preoperative therapy had a statistically significantly lower rate of apical margin involvement than those who did not (17.8 versus 47.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in surgical (p = 0.8645) or postoperative (p = 0.173) complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant androgen withdrawal with a 12-week course of 300 mg. cyproterone acetate daily results in a lower rate of positive margins without adversely affecting postoperative recovery. The impact on patient survival will be determined by long-term followup.     

Cost benefit of emerging technology in localized carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE: In a health care environment strongly concerned with cost containment, cost-benefit studies of new technology must include analyses of loco-regional tumor control, morbidity, impact on quality of life, and financial considerations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This nonrandomized study analyzes 124 patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D CRT) and 153 with standard irradiation (SRT) between January 1992 and December 1995, for histologically proven adenocarcinoma of prostate, clinical Stage T1 or T2. Mean follow-up is 1.4 years. Three-dimensional CRT consisted of six or seven coplanar oblique and lateral and, in some patients, AP fields designed to treat the prostate with a 1 to 1.7 cm margin. SRT consisted of 120 degrees bilateral arc rotation. Total doses to prostate were 67 to 70 Gy when pelvic lymph nodes were irradiated or 68.4 to 73.8 Gy when prostatic volume only was treated; dose per fraction was 1.8 Gy. Patients were interviewed weekly for severity of 12 acute intestinal and urinary pelvic irradiation side effects (0 to 4+ grading). Time and effort for 3D RTP and daily treatment with 3D CRT and SRT were recorded. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for gross tumor volume, planning target volume, bladder, and rectum. Actual reimbursement to the hospital and university was determined for 41 3D CRT, 43 SRT, and 40 radical prostatectomy patients treated during the same period. RESULTS: Average treatment planning times (in minutes) were: 101 for 3D conformal therapy simulation, 66 for contouring of target volume and sensitive structures, 55 for virtual simulation, 39 for plan preparation and documentation, 65 for physical simulation, and 20 for approval of treatment plan. Daily mean treatment times were 19 min for 3D CRT with Cerrobend blocking, 16 with multileaf collimation, and 10 with bilateral arc rotation. Dosimetric analysis (DVHs) showed a reduction of 50% in volume of bladder or rectum receiving doses higher than 65 Gy. Acute side effects included dysuria, moderate difficulty in urinating, and nocturia in 25-39% of both SRT and CRT patients; loose stools or diarrhea in 5-12% of 3D CRT and 16-22% of SRT patients; moderate proctitis in 3% of 3D CRT and 12% of SRT patients (p = 0.01). Chemical disease-free survival (prostate-specific antigen < or =2 ng/ml) at 3 years was 90% with 3D CRT and 80% with SRT (p = 0.01). Average initial treatment reimbursements were $13,823 (3D CRT), $10,864 (SRT), and $12,250 (radical prostatectomy). Average total treatment reimbursement and projected cost of management of initial therapy failures per patients were $15,173, $16,264, and $16,405, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional CRT irradiated less bladder and rectum volume than SRT; CRT initial reimbursement was 28% higher than SRT and 12% higher than radical prostatectomy. Because of projected better local tumor control, average total cost of treating a patient with 3D CRT or radical prostatectomy is equivalent to cost of SRT. Treatment morbidity was lower with 3D CRT. Our findings reflect an overall benefit with 3D CRT as a new promising technology in treatment of localized prostate cancer. Dose-escalation studies may enhance its efficacy and cost benefit.     

MR imaging of pelvic lymph nodes in primary pelvic carcinoma with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (Combidex): preliminary observations

The potential of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (Combidex)-enhanced MRI of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with primary pelvic carcinoma is evaluated. Fifteen histologically classified lymph nodes in six patients with known primary pelvic cancer (four prostate; one rectum; one uterus) were evaluated with T2-weighted fast spin-echo (FSE) and T2*-weighted gradient-echo (GRE) MRI at 1.5T 12 to 48 hours after intravenous administration of Combidex at a dose of 1.7 mg Fe/kg. Quantitative image evaluation was performed by comparing signal intensity of individual nodes on pre- and postcontrast images. All patients proceeded to pelvic lymph-node biopsy or surgical dissection, where six were found to be benign and nine were malignant. Of the 15 lymph nodes, four nodes showed a decrease in signal intensity. Of these, three, in which signal loss was homogenous were benign, and one, in which the signal-intensity decrease was heterogeneous, was malignant (micrometastases). No signal change was noted in 11 of 15 lymph nodes of which three were benign (inflammatory) and eight were malignant. Combidex is a promising MR contrast agent for evaluating pelvic lymph nodes. Our preliminary observations suggest that the agent is most useful for classifying normal lymph nodes.