Thermal conductivity issues of EB‐PVD thermal barrier coatings

The thermal conductivity of electron‐beam physical vapor deposited (EB‐PVD) thermal barrier coatings (TBCs) was investigated by the Laser Flash technique. Sample type and methodology of data analyses as well as atmosphere during the measurement have some influence on the data. A large variation of the thermal conductivity was found by changes in TBC microstructure. Exposure at high temperature caused sintering of the porous microstructure that finally increased thermal conductivity up to 30 %. EB‐PVD TBCs show a distinct thickness dependence of the thermal conductivity due to the anisotropic microstructure in thickness direction. Thin TBCs had a 20 % lower thermal conductivity than thick coatings. New compositions of the ceramic top layer offer the largest potential to lower thermal conductivity. Values down to 0.8W/(mK) have been already demonstrated with virgin coatings of pyrochlore compositions.     

Microstructure behaviour and influence on thermally grown oxide formation of double‐ceramic‐layer EB‐PVD thermal barrier coatings annealed at 1,300 °C under ambient isothermal conditions

To resist high thermal loads in turbines effectively, turbine blades are protected by thermal barrier coatings in combination with additional air cooling. State‐of‐the‐art yttria stabilised zirconia top coats do not operate at temperatures higher than 1,200 °C. Promising candidates for alternative top coats are pyrochlores, lanthanum zirconate and gadolinium zirconate. But lifetime of pyrochlores is short because of spallation. However, combinations of yttria stabilised zirconia and lanthanum zirconate or gadolinium zirconate as multilayer systems are promising top layers operating at higher temperatures than yttria stabilised zirconia. Such thermal barrier coatings top coats as double‐ceramic‐layer systems consisting of 7 wt.% yttria stabilised zirconia and lanthanum zirconate or gadolinium zirconate were deposited by Electron Beam‐Physical Vapour Deposition. The focus of the work was set on the influence of the coating design and the microstructure variation generated at different rotating speeds on the adhesion and thermally grown oxide behaviour after isothermal oxidation at 1,300 °C. Phase formation of the thermal barrier coatings top coats was obtained using X‐ray diffraction. After isothermal oxidation tests for 50 h at 1,300 °C, both, microstructure change and the formation of the thermally grown oxide were investigated. While the pyrochlore single‐ceramic‐layer are completely spalled off, microstructure of the double‐ceramic‐layer reveals only crack initiation. The thermally grown oxide thickness was determined by means of scanning electron microscopy. A high aluminum and oxygen content in the thermally grown oxide is found using X‐ray spectroscopy. Existence of α‐phase in Al₂O₃ was proved by X‐ray diffraction. After isothermal testing, no phase transformation can be detected regarding the double‐ceramic‐layer coatings.     

Thermal cycling and isothermal oxidation behavior of quadruple EB‐PVD thermal barrier coatings

Increase of energy efficiency by increasing the turbine inlet temperature is the main driving force for further investigations regarding new thermal barrier coating materials. Today, thermal barrier coatings consisting of yttria stabilized zirconia are state of the art. In this study, thermal barrier coatings consisting of 7 weight percent yttria stabilized zirconia (7YSZ) and pyrochlore lanthanum zirconate (La₂Zr₂O₇) were deposited by electron beam physical vapor deposition. Regarding thermal cycling and isothermal oxidation behavior different layer architectures such as mono‐, double‐ and quadruple ceramic layers were investigated. The thermal shock behavior was examined by thermocycle tests at temperatures in the range between T = 50 °C ‐1,150 °C. Additionally, the isothermal oxidation behavior at a temperature of T = 1,150 °C with dwell times of t= 50 h and t = 100 h was studied in the present work. The conducted research concerning the behavior of various thermal barrier coating systems under thermal cycle and isothermal load highlights the potential of multilayer thermal barrier coatings for operating in high temperature areas.     

Tailoring protective coatings for all‐oxide ceramic matrix composites in high temperature‐/high heat flux environments and corrosive media

The application range of porous all‐oxide ceramic matrix composites (CMCs) can be significantly extended through deposition of protective coating systems. Typical applications include protection against erosion, wear and foreign object damage as well as a reduced permeability. Environmental barrier coatings (EBC) are mandatory in order to guarantee sufficient lifetime of the CMC components under high temperature‐, high heat flux conditions and corrosive attack (combustor liners, thermal protection systems for atmospheric reentry). Limited thermal stability of today’s oxide fibers requires additional thermal barrier functionality for EBCs in order to keep the effective CMC bulk temperatures below 1200 °C. Depending on the specific application DLR’s coating concept for all‐oxide CMCs is based on either a single reaction‐bonded aluminium oxide (RBAO) coating or a hybrid coating system consisting of a RBAO bond coat followed by an EB‐PVD YSZ/FSZ top coat and is highlighted for three case studies. Deposition techniques (magnetron sputtering, MOCVD) alternative to EB‐PVD as well as the suitability of fibrous and cellular materials for thick EBC/TBC layers are explored.