Use of the BioHole™ device for the creation of tunnel tracks for buttonhole cannulation of fistula for hemodialysis

Buttonhole cannulation is a method of cannulation of native arteriovenous fistulae traditionally practiced by self‐cannulators. At St Michael's Hospital, this method has been modified to allow its use in problematic fistulae by multiple cannulators. In a busy dialysis unit, the need for a few specific cannulators to establish the tunnel tracks in combination with the variable dialysis schedules creates logistical challenges. A new method of creating tunnel tracks with the use of the BioHole^? device was evaluated. Buttonhole tracks were created in 12 patients using a peg of polycarbonated material with a holder (BioHole^? kit). The peg was inserted into the path left by the hemodialysis sharp needle following the index cannulation. Four of the 12 patients had an alternate access. Buttonhole tracks were successfully created in all the patients, albeit in 2 patients, the initial attempt to establish buttonhole tracks was aborted due to complications and the procedure was rescheduled. Compared with the modified buttonhole technique, pain on cannulation following track creation was significantly less in the BioHole^? group (P<0.001). Ease of cannulation was significantly improved in the BioHole^? group (P<0.05) when compared with that in thrice‐weekly patients using the modified buttonhole technique. Hemostasis postdialysis did not differ between the study groups. The use of the BioHole^? device is effective in the creation of tunnel tracks for buttonhole cannulation, is associated with less pain, and simplifies the logistics of arranging patient and nurses' schedules.     

The salvage of aneurysmal fistulae utilizing a modified buttonhole cannulation technique and multiple cannulators

We describe the St Michael's Hospital (SMH) modified buttonhole (BH) cannulation technique as a method that offers a solution for fistulae with aneurysmal dilatation due to repetitive cannulation in a restricted area. This is a prospective cohort study of 14 chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients with problematic fistulae (marked aneurysmal formation and thinning of the overlying skin, bleeding during treatment, and prolonged hemostasis post-HD) because of repetitive, localized cannulation. Each patient was followed for 12 months. The protocol was as follows: creation of tunnel tracks by 1 to 3 experienced cannulators per patient, using sharp needles. After the tunnel tracks were established and cannulation was easily achieved with dull needles, additional cannulators were incorporated with the guidance of a mentor. Bleeding from cannulation sites during dialysis ceased within 2 weeks and skin damage resolved within 6 months in all patients. Hemostasis time postdialysis decreased from 24 to 15 min. Cannulation pain scores decreased significantly. Access flows and dynamic venous pressure measurements remained unchanged. No interventions were required to maintain access patency. In 2 cases, the aneurysms became much less evident. Complications included one episode of septic arthritis and one contact dermatitis. A third patient developed acute bacterial endocarditis 9 months following completion of her follow-up. The SMH modified BH cannulation technique can salvage problematic fistulae, prevent further damage, and induce healing of the skin in the areas of repetitive cannulation. This technique can be successfully achieved by multiple cannulators in a busy full-care HD unit.     

Clinical effects of buttonhole cannulation method on hemodialysis patients

Although the buttonhole cannulation method is now widely used as an alternative to the rope‐ladder method in most countries, only the latter method is used in Korea. This study was performed to investigate clinical benefit of the buttonhole technique for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) cannulation in maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thirty‐two patients receiving HD via mature AVF were included and AVF cannulation was performed by 20 experienced nurses. During the 8 weeks, AVFs were cannulated by the rope‐ladder method with 15‐gauge sharp needles. After creating of 2 pairs of tunnel tracks by sharp needles for 7 weeks, AVFs were cannulated by the buttonhole method using 15‐gauge blunt needles during the 16 weeks. Vascular access blood flow rate (BFR), dialysis venous pressure (DVP), and dialysis adequacy (Kt/V) were measured within the first week of the two cannulation methods. Cannulation pain, hemostasis time, and nurse's stress were evaluated at the end of the two methods. There were no statistical differences in vascular access BFR (P = 0.139), DVP (P = 0.152), and dialysis adequacy (P = 0.343) between the two methods. However, the buttonhole method shortened hemostasis time (P = 0.001) and decreased cannulation pain (P = 0.001) as well as nurse's stress (P = 0.001) compared with the rope‐ladder method. In conclusion, the buttonhole cannulation method improves hemostasis time, cannulation pain, and nurse's stress without a change in vascular access BFR and dialysis adequacy in HD patients.     

Supercath Safety Clampcath buttonhole creation: Complication of catheter breakage

The creation of buttonhole tracks with Supercath Safety Clampcath is a novel and simple technique that allows dull fistula needle insertions with relative ease and diminished pain. As greater experience with this procedure develops, new issues arise for consideration. We report an unexpected complication of Supercath Safety Clampcath catheter breakage that may be due to physical distortions as a result of its location in the antecubital fossa just proximal to the elbow joint. We present a review of our experience and a framework for the safe ongoing use of this device for creation of buttonholes in fistula for hemodialysis.     

The impact of extended-hours home hemodialysis and buttonhole cannulation technique on hospitalization rates for septic events related to dialysis access

Few studies adequately document adverse events in patients receiving long, slow, and overnight hemodialysis (NHD). Concerns about high rates of dialysis access complications have been raised. This is an observational cohort study comparing hospital admission rates for vascular access complications between alternate nightly NHD (n=63) and conventional hemodialysis (n=172) patients established on chronic hemodialysis for at least 3 months. Overall, hospital admission rates and hospital admission rates for cardiac and all infective events are also reported. The NHD cohort was younger and less likely to be female, diabetic, or have ischemic heart disease than the conventional hemodialysis cohort. When NHD and buttonhole cannulation technique were used simultaneously, there was a demonstrated increased risk of septic dialysis access events: incidence rate ratio 3.0 (95% confidence interval 1.04-8.66) (P=0.04). The majority of blood culture isolates in NHD patients were gram-positive organisms, particularly Staphylococcus aureus. Alternate nightly NHD did not significantly change total hospital admissions or hospital admissions for indications other than dialysis access complications, compared with conventional hemodialysis. Our data suggest that buttonhole cannulation technique should be used with caution in patients performing extended-hours hemodialysis as this combination appears to increase the risk of septic access complications. Randomized-controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.     

The Buttonhole Technique of Fistula Access: A Personal Experience

Iam a 16-year home hemodialysis patient using the buttonhole method of needle insertion into my arteriovenous fistula. From the beginning of my home training I was taught to stick myself. Like most patients, I was taught to rotate needle sites up and down my arm. I used this method for 10 years. In 1990, I learned about the buttonhole technique; I started using it and am still using it today with great success. In this method needles are inserted in the exact same holes. There is no pain with this technique, and there is a great sense of confidence in having fixed, well-known sites; I am certain to have a successful stick almost every time. The buttonhole technique practically eliminated infiltrations. Since I see no reason why the buttonhole sites cannot be used on a daily basis, I am looking forward to using the technique when daily hemodialysis becomes available.     

Home hemodialysis associated infection—The “Achilles' Heel” of intensive hemodialysis

Home hemodialysis (HHD) is emerging as an important alternate renal replacement therapy. Although there are multiple clinical advantages with HHD, concerns surrounding increased risks of infection in this group of patients remain a major barrier to its implementation. In contrast to conventional hemodialysis, infection related complication represents the major morbidity in this mode of renal replacement therapy. Vascular access related infection is an important cause of infection in this population. Use of central vein catheters and buttonhole cannulation in HHD are important modifiable risk factors for HHD associated infection. Several preventive measures are suggested in the literature, which will require further prospective validation.     

Challenges of providing maintenance hemodialysis in a resource poor country: Experience from a single teaching hospital in Lagos,Southwest Nigeria

Providing maintenance hemodialysis is associated with high costs and poor outcomes. In Nigeria, more than 90% of the population lives below the poverty line, and patients with end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) pay out‐of‐pocket for maintenance hemodialysis. To highlight the challenges of providing maintenance hemodialysis for patients with ESRD in Nigeria, we reviewed records of all patients who joined the maintenance hemodialysis program of our dialysis unit over a 21‐month period. Information regarding frequency of hemodialysis, types of vascular access for dialysis, mode of anemia treatment and frequency of blood transfusion received were retrieved. One hundred and twenty patients joined the maintenance hemodialysis program of our unit during the period under review. Seventy‐two (60%) were males and the mean age of the study population was 47 + 14 years. The mean hemoglobin concentration at commencement of dialysis was 7.3 g/dL + 1.6 g/dL. The initial vascular access was femoral vein cannulation in all the patients. A total of 73.5% of the patients required blood transfusion at some point with 33% receiving five or more pints of blood. Only 3.3% of the patients had thrice weekly dialysis, 21.7% dialyzed twice weekly, 23.3% once weekly, 16.7% once in two weeks, 2.5% once in three weeks and 11.7% once monthly. At the time of review, 8.3% of the patients had died while 38.3% were lost to follow‐up. Majority of patients with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis in our unit were poorly prepared for dialysis, were under‐dialyzed, and were frequently transfused with blood with resultant poor outcomes.     

Remove or not,that is the question: A case report on carotid artery cannulation during indwelling venous hemodialysis catheter

A 58‐year‐old woman visited the emergency department for acute occlusion of arteriovenous fistula. One session of hemodialysis was scheduled via temporary venous hemodialysis catheter before thrombectomy. Unfortunately, neck arterial cannulation was discovered after complete placement of catheter. The catheter was removed immediately but bleeding could not be stopped. Pseudoaneurysm over the right carotid artery was proved by angiography and repaired by graft stent. Arterial cannulation during venous hemodialysis catheter insertion is a rare but serious complication and there is no standard response recommended. Immediate removal of the misplaced hemodialysis catheter might not be the best choice. We suggest to leave the misplaced catheter in artery until further intervention in consideration of complications and repair access. Every hemodialysis center should standardize responses to arterial cannulation during venous hemodialysis catheter indwelling, especially carotid puncture happens, according to the medical facility.     

Six years of experience with nightly home hemodialysis access

Background: Lynchburg Nephrology Dialysis Incorporated started its nightly home hemodialysis (NHHD) program in September 1997. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate episodes of exit‐site infections, catheter sepsis, and safety and longevity of accesses for patients doing NHHD. Method: If internal jugular (IJ) catheter was chosen, the patient was started on 2 mg coumadin per day when catheter was placed. If catheter malfunctioned, it was blocked with a thrombolytic agent and coumadin was adjusted to meet a goal international normalized ratio (INR) of 1.5 to 2.25. If the problem persisted, the catheter was exchanged. For catheters, a threaded lock cannula (BD InterLink device, BD) was used to prevent air emboli and infections and a locking device was used to prevent disconnects. If arteriovenous (AV) fistula was used, four buttonholes were established using 16‐gauge needles. If AV graft was used, patients were taught the rope ladder cannulation technique using 16‐gauge needles. Results: As of September 1, 2003, 45 patients have completed training and have performed 27,063 treatments at home. Total catheter time at home was 930 months. Total AV fistula and AV graft times at home were 190 and 20 months, respectively. Upon completion of training, 34 patients were using tunneled IJ catheters, 10 were using AV fistulas, and 1 was using an AV graft. The IJ catheter exit‐site and sepsis infection rates were 0.35 and 0.52 episodes per 1000 patient‐days, respectively. Mean catheter life was 8.5 months with the longest being 66.7 months and the shortest being 0.2 months. The AV fistula and graft exit‐site and sepsis infection rates were 0.16 and 0 episodes per 1000 patient‐days, respectively. Catheter complications included one episode of disconnect due to patient's failure to use the locking device, one episode of central stenosis, and one episode of intracranial hemorrhage, due to prolonged INR, with resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: Data support the fact that tunneled IJ catheters, AV fistulas, and AV grafts are effective and safe permanent accesses for patients on NHHD.     

The use of vascular access audit and infections in home hemodialysis

Vascular access‐related infection is an important adverse event in home hemodialysis (HHD). We hypothesize that errors in self‐cannulation or manipulation of dialysis vascular access are associated with increased incidence of access‐related infection. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all prevalent HHD patients at the University Health Network. All vascular access‐related infections were recorded from 2006 to 2013. Errors in dialysis access were ascertained by nurse‐administered vascular access checklist. Ninety‐two patients had completed at least one vascular access audit. Median HHD vintage was 2.3 (0.9–5.0) years in patients with appropriate vascular access technique and 5.8 (1.5–9.4) years in patients with erroneous vascular access technique. The overall rate of infection between patients with and without appropriate vascular access technique was similar (0.27 and 0.28 infections per year, P = 0.166). Among patients who were identified with errors in dialysis access manipulation, patients with five or more errors were associated with higher rate of access‐related infection (mean of 0.47 vs. 0.16 infection per patient‐year, P < 0.001). The use of vascular access audit is a feasible strategy, which can identify errors in vascular access technique. Patients with a longer median HHD vintage are associated with higher risk of inappropriate vascular access technique. Patients with multiple errors in vascular access technique are associated with a higher risk of dialysis access‐related infection. Prospective evaluation of the impact of vascular access audit on adverse vascular access events is warranted.     

Initial clinical experience with a new heparin-coated chronic hemodialysis catheter

In this paper we wish to report our clinical experience with a new heparin-coated dialysis catheter with a symmetric tip. Over a 16-month period, 60 heparin-coated Tal Palindrome^™ catheters were placed in 57 patients. Catheter patency, catheter-related complications, and reasons for catheter removal were recorded. The patient's initial cause of end-stage renal disease, underlying diseases, and site of access were recorded as well. Patients were specifically followed for development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Patient ages were 34–91 (average 66). Fifty-four percent of patients had a history of diabetes. Sixty catheters were placed for a total of 5353 catheter-days. The average catheter indwell time was 107 days (range of 2–381 days). Catheter-related infection occurred in 6 patients over the study period, with a rate of 1.12/1000 catheter-days. Bacteremia occurred in 3 patients with a rate of 0.56/1000 catheter-days. Six catheters were removed or exchanged due to malfunction. There was no incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Initial clinical experience with the heparin-coated Tal Palindrome^™ hemodialysis catheter demonstrated safe, reliable use, and low infection rates.     

Stenosis and thrombosis—unveiled complications of buttonhole cannulation

The vascular access is the mainstay of hemodialysis. Arteriovenous fistula has been prioritized as the first choice of long‐term vascular access for its inferior rate of complications and improved patient survival. Rope ladder and buttonhole venipuncture are the most common techniques for arteriovenous fistulae cannulation. Much of the concern regarding buttonhole cannulation is the increased risk for potentially severe systemic infections. Increased risk for stenosis and thrombosis has been addressed but not confirmed. We discuss two cases of stenosis and thrombosis related to buttonhole puncture which heralded angiography intervention, raising awareness for the demand of close surveillance of arteriovenous fistulae when using buttonhole cannulation.     

Clinical hemodialysis experience with percutaneous arteriovenous fistulas created using the Ellipsys® vascular access system

Introduction: The aim of this study is to report our clinical hemodialysis experience using a percutaneous arteriovenous fistula (pAVF) created with the Ellipsys® vascular access system. This pAVF device creates a permanent AVF anastomosis between the proximal radial artery (PRA) and the deep communicating vein (DCV) in the proximal forearm. Methods: The medical records of all patients with a pAVF were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical data analyzed included reliability of pAVF use, quality of dialysis, rate and success of puncture, and pAVF related complications, along with incidence of subsequent interventions. Findings: Between May 2017 and November 2018, 34 patients had a pAVF created with technical success in 33 patients (97%). Twenty‐eight out of 34 (82%) patients had successful two‐needle cannulation within 10 days to 6 weeks after pAVF creation. The mean Kt/v was 1.6 (1.2‐2) and the average recirculation was 10%. Fifteen patients (44%) needed no further access intervention. Twelve patients (35%) required an additional procedure to assist maturation of the pAVF in order to facilitate puncture. The average blood flow measured at the brachial artery, before the first cannulation, was 850 ml/min. From causes unrelated to the procedure, four patients died during the follow‐up study. Two patients required revision to a surgical AVF. None of the pAVFs developed aneurysmal degeneration steal syndrome, or high access flow related issues. Discussion: The Ellipsys® pAVF offers a safe and functional vascular access for hemodialysis. Advantages included prompt access maturation, avoidance of high flow AVFs, and a simple nonsurgical procedure with high patient satisfaction. Functional outcomes are equivalent and likely better than surgical fistulas. There appears to be less aneurysmal degeneration and need for future re‐intervention. Objective dialysis parameters indicate excellent quality of hemodialysis for the patient.     

Coronal mode ultrasound guided hemodialysis cannulation: A pilot randomized comparison with standard cannulation technique

Background: Infiltrations from cannulation result in significant morbidity including loss of hemodialysis (HD) vascular access (VA). Cannulation is dependent on personnel skill and VA characteristics. Surface marking of VA lacks real‐time information and traditional ultrasound (US) devices are large, expensive, requiring skilled operators. Sonic Window© (Analogic Ultrasound, Peabody, MA, USA) is a coronal mode ultrasound device (CMUD) approved for VA cannulation. Methods: Single center randomized, prospective pilot study comparing handheld US‐guided cannulation of new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to standard cannulation practices. Patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) on in‐center HD who had a new AVF cleared for cannulation and dialysis were enrolled. Patients with new AVF received either standard cannulation (control group) or image guidance using CMUD (study group) for 3 weeks. Ultrasound characteristics of VA, cannulation practices and complications end points were obtained. Results: An infiltration rate of 9.7% was noted during the study. Slightly lower odds ratio (OR) of infiltration was observed in the study group (OR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.26–3.41, P value = 0.93). Study group yielded longer time for assessment (101.8 ± 80.2 vs. 22.3 ± 22.5 seconds, P = < 0.001), increased cannulation time (41.1 ± 70.6 vs. 25.0 ± 27.9 seconds, P = 0.04), and increased patient satisfaction (94.6% vs. 82%, P = 0.04) compared to control group. Number of cannulation attempts, needle size, arterial or venous needle insertion, and tourniquet usage between groups were not statistically different. Conclusion: Handheld ultrasound is a safe and useful aid in cannulation of dialysis access.     

Cannulation and vascular access-related complications in hemodialysis: Factors determining successful cannulation

Little is known about cannulation of the vascular access (VA), such as the number of successful cannulation procedures, frequency of complications caused by cannulation, and VA failure. Incident patients were followed for 6 months, from the first successful cannulation with 2 needles—both used for the hemodialysis treatment. Data included patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medication. Vascular access characteristics included: type of VA and location, vein diameter assessed by Duplex ultrasound, length of the cannulation route, and maturation period. Longitudinal data were collected by dialysis nurses, using identical questionnaires, and a standardized method to register data from each dialysis session. Among 10 Dutch dialysis facilities, clinical data from 120 patients were collected from June 2005 to March 2007. The use of autogenous arteriovenous fistulae (P<0.001) and limited length of the cannulation route (P<0.003) negatively affect the outcome of cannulation and complications such as use of single-needle (SN) dialysis and central vein catheters (CVC). Previous use of CVC and SN hemodialysis were significant predictors for VA failure (P<0.0001). The present study demonstrated that during the first 6 months of a newly placed VA, a huge number of cannulation-related complications such as miscannulation, use of CVC, and SN dialysis are encountered. Despite the fact that guidelines recommended the arteriovenous fistulae as the preferred VA, cannulation-related complications can lead to increased morbidity. The length of the cannulation route positively correlates with successful cannulation. Therefore, adjusted cannulation techniques might be indicated to improve VA outcome.     

Ultrasound-guided cutaneous nerve chemo-ablation for severe access site neuropathic pain—A case report

Neuropathic pain at the cannulation site is challenging, both for the patient and the dialysis team. We present a case of a middle-aged man on chronic hemodialysis, who developed excruciating pain at the cannulation area without incident, limiting his dialysis sessions. Multidisciplinary collaboration allowed identification of the cutaneous nerve—the inferior lateral cutaneous nerve of the arm, relaying his pain. Subsequent ultrasound-guided phenol chemoablation resulted in the complete resolution of his pain and allowed continued use of the well-functioning fistula for dialysis.     

Long-term outcomes of transposed basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae

The need for reliable, long-term hemodialysis vascular access remains critical. To determine the long-term outcomes of transposed basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae (BVT) and their comparability with other vascular accesses, we determined retrospectively the primary and secondary patency rates in 58 BVT and in a total of 58 arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) at a single center. Fifty-eight BVT were placed in 57 individuals, 69% after prior vascular access failure. Ten BVT failed before initial use and 2 patients expired with functioning accesses before dialysis initiation. In all 58 BVT, 46.8+/-10.8% functioned at 3 years, with median survival 30.8 months. Limiting analyses to the 46 BVT that were ultimately accessed, 3-year primary and secondary patency rates were 38.3+/-7.7% and 56.5+/-12.6%, respectively. Lower ejection fraction (p=0.054) and greater numbers of prior permanent dialysis catheters (p=0.005) were present in those with failed BVT. Compared with AVF, BVT had similar 3-year primary and secondary patency rates. The secondary patency rate was significantly better for BVT vs. AVG over the observation period; at 3 years, the rates were 56.5+/-12.6% vs. 9.1+/-6.0% (p=0.002), respectively. Basilic vein arteriovenous fistulae are valuable hemodialysis accesses. Although nearly 20% of newly placed BVT will not function before first use, those that are functional have median survivals exceeding 6 years, and 38% will not require intervention within 3 years of initial use.     

Blood Access Outcomes Associated with Short Daily Hemodialysis

With the growing number of reports that daily hemodialysis (DHD) improves clinical outcomes and quality of life, there has been increased interest in the effects of more frequent venipunctures on blood accesses. Since 1996, we have converted 30 patients (27 in‐center, 3 home) from conventional 3/week dialysis to short, daily, 6/week dialysis (sDHD). Twenty‐five patients started for medical indications. End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) causes were diabetes mellitus (in 7), hypertension (6), glomerulonephritis (8), hereditary nephritis (2), and other (7). Mean (±SD) age was 57 ± 16 years. Patients had an average of 3.8 major comorbidities in addition to ESRD. Thirty patients were followed on sDHD for 388 patient‐months: 9 patients died after 4.2 ± 6.7 months, 3 were transplanted at 5.4 ± 2.2 months, and 3 were disenrolled at 9.3 ± 10.5 months. Fifteen patients remain on sDHD at 20.4 ± 14.1 months. Access problems for the 12 months prior to sDHD were compared to those that occurred while the patient was on sDHD. Problems were tracked by access type. There were 40 different accesses in 30 patients with a cumulative 28.07 access‐years pre‐DHD; 24 of these accesses were artificial bridge grafts (ABG) of either polytetrafluoroethylene or bovine material. There were 27 access problems pre‐DHD, or 0.962 problems per access‐year. On sDHD these same 30 patients had 41 accesses for 34.44 access‐years; 23 of these were ABGs. There were 31 access problems or 0.900 problems per access‐year. There were no significant differences in access problems comparing pre‐DHD with on‐sDHD, either in aggregate or when analyzed by access type. After 39 months of observation, there does not appear to be an increase in blood access problems when patients are converted from conventional dialysis to sDHD.     

We Should Strive for Optimal Hemodialysis: A Criticism of the Hemodialysis Adequacy Concept

Adequacy of hemodialysis is frequently equated with Kt/V_urea , the amount of urea clearance (K) multiplied by time (t) and divided by urea distribution volume (V). Several formulas have been developed to calculate Kt/V_urea from the pre‐ and post‐dialysis urea concentrations. In three‐times‐weekly hemodialysis, a single pool (spKt/V_urea) value of 1.3 per treatment is commonly considered to indicate adequate therapy.
Despite providing the recommended spKt/V_urea of 1.3 per treatment, short dialysis with rapid ultrafiltration is associated with multiple intradialytic and interdialytic complications. Patients experience cramps, nausea, vomiting, headaches, fatigue, hypotensive episodes during dialysis, and hangover after dialysis; patients remain fluid overloaded with subsequent poor blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy, diastolic dysfunction, and high cardiovascular mortality.
According to Webster's dictionary, "optimal" means most desirable or satisfactory; "adequate" means sufficient for a specific requirement or barely sufficient or satisfactory. Optimal dialysis is the method of dialysis yielding results that cannot be further improved. New approaches, including hemeral quotidian or long nocturnal dialysis, provide opportunities to abandon the notion that adequate dialysis is "good enough" for our patients. Optimal dialysis should be our goal. Dialysis sessions should be long and frequent enough to provide excellent intra‐ and interdialytic tolerance of hemodialysis, normalization of serum calcium and phosphorus, blood pressure control, normal myocardial morphology and function, and hormonal balance, and to eliminate all, even subtle, uremic symptoms.