Discrepancies between diagnosed asthma, asthma-like symptoms and a test for abnormal lung function

For the diagnosis of asthma, it is neither clear to which degree various tests and symptoms identify the same subjects nor how these characteristics are best combined. We assessed the interrelationship between physician-diagnosed asthma, asthma-like symptoms and abnormal airway function in a population based sample of 495 12-15 year old schoolchildren. Participants filled in a questionnaire and underwent baseline spirometry (FEV1%), provocation with treadmill exercise (EXE) and with inhaled methacholine (PD15), and monitoring of peak expiratory flow (PEF) twice daily for two weeks. Most symptomatic subjects with any test positive were identified by PD15 alone (75%) or in combination with PEF monitoring (89%). Although interest agreement was weak (kappa < 0.40 for all pairs), significant associations were found between PD15 and EXE, between PEF and EXE and between FEV1% and PD15. However, PEF variability and methacholine responsiveness seem to identify different varieties of airway pathophysiology, and the combined use of the two tests may be helpful as an epidemiological screening tool for asthma.     

Changes in neurokinin A airway responsiveness with inhaled lysine-acetylsalicylate in asthma

Endogenously released cyclooxygenase products modulate the bronchoconstrictor response to various stimuli in asthma. Little is known of the change in airway responsiveness to neurokinin A (NKA) after cyclooxygenase blockade. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we have investigated the effect of the potent cyclooxygenase inhibitor, lysine acetylsalicylate (L-ASA) administered by inhalation, on the bronchoconstrictor response both to neurokinin A (NKA) and methacholine in nine asthmatic subjects. Subjects attended the laboratory on four separate occasions to receive nebulized L-ASA (solution of 90 mg.mL-1) or matched placebo (glycine, solution of 30 mg.mL-1) 15 min prior to bronchial challenge with NKA or methacholine, in a randomized, double-blind order. Changes in airway calibre were followed as forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and agonist responsiveness, expressed as the provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 from baseline (PC20). L-ASA elicited a significant fall in FEV1 from baseline. When compared with placebo, inhaled L-ASA reduced the airway responsiveness to NKA in 8 of the 9 subjects studied, the geometric mean (range) values for PC20 NKA increasing significantly from 153.2 (52.0-258.9) to 303.1 (83.4-668.5) micrograms.mL-1 after placebo and L-ASA, respectively. However, no significant change in airway responsiveness to methacholine was recorded after L-ASA, their geometric mean (range) PC20 values being 1.60 (0.17-9.59) and 1.53 (0.09-14.01) mg.mL-1 after placebo and L-ASA, respectively. The small decrease in airway responsiveness to neurokinin A after administration of lysine acetylsalicylate by inhalation suggests that endogenous prostaglandins may play a contributory protective role in the airway response to neurokinin A in human asthma.     

Comparative influence of a single allergen exposure on the different components of airway response to methacholine

We compared the effects of an allergen challenge on airway responsiveness to methacholine, the slope of the dose-response curve (DRC) and post-methacholine fall in forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/FVC, and determined whether any changes in these parameters were related to the presence and magnitude of the late asthmatic response (LAR) in mild stable asthma. Twenty-three allergic asthmatic subjects had an allergen challenge, preceded and followed 24 (n = 12) and/or 48 (n = 22) h later by a methacholine challenge. Sixteen subjects had a dual asthmatic response to the allergen. On the post-allergen methacholine challenge, as compared with the pre-allergen test, differences in mean fall in FVC or FEV1/FVC at 20% fall in FEV1 and the slope of the DRC did not achieve statistical significance, even in the group with LAR, which showed a significant increase in airway responsiveness at 24 h. There was, however, a correlation between allergen-induced changes in PC20 and (1) the change in post-methacholine FVC fall in the LAR group at 48 h, and (2) the change in the slope of the DRC in the early-asthmatic-response group at 24 h. In conclusion, allergen-challenge-induced changes in airway response to methacholine are heterogeneous among asthmatic subjects and although it may increase airway responsiveness (PC20), particularly in late responders, it minimally affects the other aspects of airway response to methacholine, suggesting that a more powerful or sustained allergic stimulus is required to modify the latter.     

Lack of correlation between bronchoconstrictor response and bronchodilator response in a population-based study

Bronchodilator and bronchoconstrictor responsiveness have been considered physiological opposites in patients with obstructive airways disease. Provocation challenges have been replaced by bronchodilator tests in the assessment of cases of severe airways obstruction. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator responsiveness, and their supposed interchangeability, in a general population. From the Vlagtwedde-Vlaardingen follow-up study, 101 adults were recruited (mean (SD) age 55 (11) yrs, 67 males and 34 females, and 31 were smokers). All completed a questionnaire on airways symptoms. Bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator responsiveness were assessed with cumulative dose-response curves, using histamine and terbutaline, respectively. Thus, it was possible to relate histamine sensitivity of the airways (the concentration of histamine, at which forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) falls by 10% (PC10)) to the maximal bronchodilator response (delta FEV1) and the sensitivity to the bronchodilator (cumulative dose of inhaled terbutaline at which FEV1 increases by 10% (RD10)). Subjects with a bronchoconstrictor response (PC10 < or = 16 mg x mL(-1); n=38) had more respiratory symptoms than those without (n=63) (40 versus 21%) and also lower baseline FEV1 values (90 versus 96% predicted), but had comparable bronchodilator responsiveness. Subjects with a bronchodilator response (delta FEV1 > or = 9% of the predicted value; n=13) did not differ from those without (n=88) for all parameters, including symptoms, allergy and pulmonary function. In those with a bronchoconstrictor response, there was a weak but significant correlation between the PC10 and RD10 (rho=-0.32), but not between PC10 and delta FEV1. This study suggests that bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator responsiveness are not highly correlated, even in subjects with airways obstruction. Symptoms were associated with the presence of a bronchoconstrictor, but not a bronchodilator, response. We conclude that bronchoconstrictor and bronchodilator responsiveness are two different phenotypic markers that are not interchangeable in epidemiological studies.     

Antibody detection after antepartal rhesus prophylaxis: normal values or sensitization

Although poorly reproducible spirometric tests, "test failures," are associated with respiratory morbidity, it is not clear what causes them. Bronchial responsiveness was examined in relation to test failure for forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1.0) (1979 definition of the American Thoracic Society) in 249 bakers, 165 chemical industry workers, and 204 office workers. The first two groups were studied by the same methods and were combined. Test failure was observed in 4%, and for 38% the provocative dose of inhaled methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1.0 relative to FEV1.0 after the inhalation of normal saline (PD20) was < or = 120 mumol (7% with a PD20 of < or = 8 mumol). Test failure was not related to the level of PD20. Of the office workers, 3% had test failure, 11% a PD20 of < or = 8 mumol of histamine, and no significant relation was observed. The study does not exclude the possibility that bronchial responsiveness might be related to test failure in patients with airway disease or that a clearer relation might be demonstrable in a larger study, but it does suggest that it is not a major determinant of test failure.     

Metered-dose inhaler to deliver methacholine in bronchial provocation testing: a pilot study

BACKGROUND: Nonspecific bronchial provocation tests may be simplified by the use of hand-held devices to deliver methacholine. OBJECTIVE: To study the feasibility of using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) to administer methacholine in bronchial provocation tests, and the ability of such a device to diagnose bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) accurately. METHODS: In an open randomized crossover pilot study, we compared the provocative dose that induces a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20 FEV1) obtained with the methacholine MDI with that obtained using a conventional nebulizer in 20 hyperresponsive and 20 nonhyperresponsive subjects. The MDI delivers 400 doses of 100 microg of methacholine, and was used via a spacer. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) was defined as a PD20 FEV1 <2,000 microg with the conventional test using the nebulizer. The tests were performed in each subject in a randomized order, 1 to 7 days apart. RESULTS: Of the subjects who had a nebulizer PD20 FEV1 <2,000 microg, all but one had an MDI PD20 FEV1 <800 microg. When 800 microg was taken as the threshold for the diagnosis of BHR with the MDI test, the accuracy of this test to diagnose BHR was 97.5%, and the two tests were highly concordant for the diagnosis of BHR (Pearson chi2, 36.19; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: A hand-held device may be suitable for delivery of methacholine during bronchial provocation tests, if these results are confirmed in large samples.     

Inhaled steroids modify bronchial responses to hyperosmolar saline

We investigated the effects of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) on airway sensitivity (provocative dose producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline (PD20)) and reactivity (slope of the dose-response curve) to inhaled aerosols of hyperosmolar (4.5%) saline, and histamine or methacholine. This was an open study on 13 patients referred to the laboratory by their respiratory physician for investigation of their asthma. These challenges were performed on separate days before (initial visit) and 8.8 +/- 0.8 (SD) weeks (range 5.6-12.4 weeks) after (visit 1) a treatment period with BDP (dose range 600-1,500 micrograms.day-1). At visit 1 there was a significant reduction in sensitivity to 4.5% NaCl and histamine/methacholine and in reactivity. The PD20 increased 5.6 fold for 4.5% NaCl and 4.1 fold for histamine/methacholine. All patients remained responsive to histamine/methacholine and a fall in FEV1 > 20% to 4.5% saline was documented in 10 of the 13 patients. We conclude that treatment with BDP reduces sensitivity and reactivity to both osmotic and pharmacological challenge.     

Potentiating effect of inhaled acetaldehyde on bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in asthmatic subjects

BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that acetaldehyde induces bronchoconstriction indirectly via histamine release. However, no study has been performed to assess whether acetaldehyde worsens bronchial responsiveness in asthmatic subjects so this hypothesis was tested. METHODS: Methacholine provocation was performed on three occasions: (1) after pretreatment with oral placebo and inhaled saline (P-S day), (2) after placebo and inhaled acetaldehyde (P-A day), and (3) after a potent histamine H1 receptor antagonist terfenadine and acetaldehyde (T-A day) in a double blind, randomised, crossover fashion. Nine asthmatic subjects inhaled 0.8 mg/ml acetaldehyde or saline for four minutes. After each inhalation a methacholine provocation test was performed. RESULTS: Methacholine concentrations producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20-MCh) on the P-A day (0.48 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.08) and T-A day (0.41 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.77) were lower than those on the P-S day (0.85 mg/ml, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.54). There was no change in the PC20-MCh between the P-A and T-A days. A correlation was observed between the logarithmic values of PC20-MCh (log PC20-MCh) on the P-S day and the potentiating effect of acetaldehyde on the methacholine responsiveness [(log PC20-MCh on P-A day)-(log PC20-MCh on P-S day)] (rho = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: Acetaldehyde induces bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with asthma by mechanisms other than histamine release.     

Testing bronchial hyper-responsiveness: provocation or peak expiratory flow variability?

BACKGROUND: Assessing bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) is a main diagnostic criterion of asthma. Provocation testing is not readily available in general practice, but peak expiratory flow (PEF) is. Several guidelines promote the use of PEF variability as a diagnostic tool for BHR. This study tested the agreement between histamine challenge testing and PEF variability, and the consequences for diagnosing asthma. AIM: To investigate the possibility of assessing BHR by PEF variability, using a histamine provocation test as a reference. METHOD: Subjects with signs of symptoms indicating asthma (persistent or recurrent respiratory symptoms or signs of reversible bronchial obstruction) (n = 323) were studied. They had been identified in a population screening for asthma. A histamine provocation test and PEF variability were assessed over a three-week period. Asthma was defined as signs or symptoms together with a reversible airflow obstruction or BHR to the histamine challenge test. BHR was defined as a PC20 histamine of < or = 8 mg/ml or a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation between PC20 and PEF variability was calculated using Spearman's rho. Furthermore, a decision tree was constructed to clarify the role of BHR in diagnosing asthma. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients had a reversibility in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of > or = 9% predicted, 131 patients showed a PC20 of < or = 8 and 11 patients had a PEF variability of > or = 15%. Overall correlation was poor at only -0.27 (P < 0.0001). One hundred and fourteen of the 131 patients diagnosed as having asthma when the histamine challenge test was used were not diagnosed by PEF variability. CONCLUSION: PEF variability cannot replace bronchial provocation testing in assessing BHR. This indicates that PEF variability and bronchial provocation do not measure the same aspects of BHR. If BHR testing is required in diagnosing asthma, a bronchial provocation test has to be used in general practice as well.     

Preparing nurse leaders for the future: views from Canada

Airway responsiveness assessed using histamine and methacholine is safe, reproducible and relatively easily undertaken in adults and children. Results are similar for methacholine and histamine although methacholine is better tolerated. Responsiveness is increased in children and the elderly, and in women compared to men, possibly due to body size effects. Baseline lung function confounds the interpretation of airway responsiveness and may explain the effect of smoking in most studies. Results are most usefully expressed as the provocative dose producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) or the dose-response slope (DRS). When technical factors are controlled the reproducibility of the test is from one to two doubling doses. Measurements of airway responsiveness have been widely used in clinical and research practice. However, assessing their value in diagnosing asthma is limited by the lack of a gold standard for the definition of asthma. Using a cut-off value of 8 mg/mL or 8 mumol for PD20, the tests will discriminate asthmatic from non-asthmatic subjects (based on questionnaire definitions of asthma) with a sensitivity of around 60% and a specificity of around 90%. These properties of the test result in positive and negative predictive values of 86% and 69% when the prevalence of asthma is high (50%-as in the clinical setting) and 40% and 95% when the prevalence of asthma is low (10%, as in general population studies). In the usual clinical setting, assessing the significance of atypical or non-specific symptoms, the tests are of intermediate value in predicting the presence of asthma and less useful in excluding asthma. The additional benefit of testing airway responsiveness to measuring peak flows or to a trial of therapy has yet to be fully assessed. Testing of airway responsiveness may be of value in assessing occupational asthma, asthma severity and the effects of potential sensitizers or treatments. In research, tests of airway responsiveness are more useful for excluding cases of asthma. In population studies, they serve as an objective marker of abnormal airway function which may be genetically determined and, like allergy, are strongly associated with asthma. The predictive value of airway hyperresponsiveness for the development of airway disease is yet to be clearly established. In epidemiology the benefits of measuring airway responses must be weighed against the added inconvenience and cost that is incurred.     

Dose equivalence and bronchoprotective effects of salmeterol and salbutamol in asthma

BACKGROUND: Salbutamol is the most widely prescribed short acting beta 2 agonist and salmeterol is the first long acting inhaled beta 2 agonist. The dose equivalence of salmeterol and salbutamol is disputed. Estimates of weight-for-weight dose ratio have ranged from 1:2 to 1:16. A study was undertaken to clarify the true dose ratio. METHODS: The bronchoprotection afforded against repeated methacholine challenge by inhaled salmeterol 25 micrograms and 100 micrograms and salbutamol 100 micrograms and 400 micrograms was compared in a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial. Subjects were 16 stable asthmatics with a baseline forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) of > or = 65% predicted, screening concentration provoking a fall in FEV1 of 20% (PC20FEV1) of < or = 8mg/ml, and a shift in PC20FEV1 of more than two doubling concentration steps following inhalation of salbutamol 400 micrograms. On five separate occasions subjects underwent methacholine challenge before and 30 and 120 minutes after drug administration. PD20FEV1 was calculated for each challenge. FEV1 at 90 minutes after drug administration was also recorded. RESULTS: Bronchoprotection afforded by salmeterol was increased at 120 minutes compared with 30 minutes and protection by salbutamol was decreased. Protection by both doses of salmeterol was similar to salbutamol 100 micrograms at 30 minutes but significantly greater at 120 minutes. FEV1 at 90 minutes was significantly greater after salmeterol 100 micrograms than after placebo, but there were no other significant differences between treatments. Maximal observed protection was equivalent for salmeterol 100 micrograms and salbutamol 400 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS: The data are compatible with a weight-for-weight dose ratio for salmeterol:salbutamol of < or = 1:4.     

Metaproterenol responsiveness after methacholine- and histamine-induced bronchoconstriction

We investigated whether the bronchodilator response to a beta-adrenergic agonist is influenced by the mechanism of induced bronchoconstriction. Normal subjects and asymptomatic asthmatics inhaled a dry aerosol (mass median aerodynamic diameter, 1.5 microns) with increasing concentrations of methacholine or histamine to produce a 35% decrease in specific airway conductance (SGaw), followed by a single inhalation of a metaproterenol aerosol. By studying normal subjects and asthmatics, we were able to compare metaproterenol responsiveness after widely divergent doses of the bronchoprovocative agents but the same degree of bronchoconstriction. Airway deposition of methacholine, histamine, and metaproterenol was measured using a quinine fluorescence technique. Mean baseline SGaw, metaproterenol responsiveness, and metaproterenol mass deposited were similar in normal subjects and asthmatics. Likewise, mean SGaw after completion of methacholine and histamine challenge, and the subsequently deposited metaproterenol mass were similar in the two groups. After methacholine challenge (mean +/- SD provocative drug mass causing a 35% decrease in SGaw, PM35: 8.94 +/- 5.96 mumol in normal subject and 0.30 +/- 0.29 mumol in asthmatics), metaproterenol increased mean SGaw by 89 +/- 33% in normal subjects and by 190 +/- 55% in asthmatics (p < 0.05, two-way analysis of variance). After histamine challenge (PM35, 2.92 +/- 2.49 mumol in normal subjects and 0.17 +/- 0.29 mumol in asthmatics), metaproterenol increased mean SGaw by 111 +/- 38% in normal subjects and 113 +/- 69% in asthmatics (p = not significant). Thus, for the same degree of bronchoconstriction, metaproterenol responsiveness was influenced by the dose of methacholine but not the dose of histamine. The differential metaproterenol response could be related to a functional antagonism between muscarinic and beta-adrenergic agonists.     

Slowing the deterioration of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease observed during bronchodilator therapy by adding inhaled corticosteroids. A 4-year prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To determine if deterioration in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during bronchodilator therapy could be slowed by additional treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid. DESIGN: A 4-year prospective study. SETTING: Twenty-nine general practices in the catchment area of the University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. PATIENTS: The study included 56 patients (28 with asthma and 28 with COPD) who showed an annual decrease in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of at least 80 mL in combination with at least two exacerbations per year during bronchodilator therapy alone. Forty-eight patients completed the study. INTERVENTION: During the first 2 years of treatment, patients received only bronchodilator therapy (salbutamol, 400 micrograms, or ipratropium bromide, 40 micrograms). During years 3 and 4, they received additional treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 micrograms two times daily. RESULTS: Prebronchodilator FEV1 increased 458 mL/y (95% CI, 233 to 683 mL/y) during the first 6 months of beclomethasone treatment; FEV1 then decreased 102 mL/y (CI, 57 to 147 mL/y) during months 7 to 24. The annual decline in FEV1 during beclomethasone treatment was less than the decline of 160 mL/y seen before beclomethasone therapy (difference, 58 mL/y; 95% CI, 2 to 87 mL/y). Only in patients with asthma did beclomethasone treatment improve bronchial hyperresponsiveness (assessed by determining the concentration of histamine that provoked a 20% decrease in FEV1 [PC20]) by 3.0 doubling doses per year (95% CI, 0.8 to 5.2 doses per year). Beclomethasone treatment was associated with improvement in peak expiratory flow rate, alleviation of symptoms, and a decrease in the number of exacerbations in both patient groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding beclomethasone, 800 micrograms daily, slowed the unfavorable course of asthma or COPD seen with bronchodilator therapy alone. This effect was most evident in asthmatic patients.     

Respiratory symptoms, lung function tests, airway responsiveness, and bronchoalveolar lymphocyte subsets in B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia

A respiratory questionnaire was completed and spirometry, tests for lung volumes, diffusion capacity for CO, and methacholine bronchial challenge were performed in 24 outpatients with B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), aged 44-79, presenting in different stages of their disease. In 10 patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid was also obtained. Ten of twenty-four patients had symptoms consistent with chronic bronchitis, unrelated both to smoking history and to the clinical stage. Abnormal values (< 2 SD) were found in 4 patients for total lung capacity (TLC), in 9 for vital capacity (VC), 8 for forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), 11 for MEF50, 15 for MEF25 and in 7 for diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. Seven of nineteen patients had PD20FEV1 at less than 1,600 micrograms of methacholine chloride. There was a significantly negative correlation between white blood cell count and VC (r = 0.41, P < 0.05). A positive correlation was found between PD20FEV1 and FEV1/VC (r = 0.61, P < 0.01). The mean and SEM for BAL cells/ml was 463 (71.8) x 10(3). No leukemic cells but a marked increase in T lymphocytes (32.5 +/- 7.8%) were found in BAL fluid. There were significantly negative correlations between the number of BAL CD3+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.61, P < 0.05), and between the number of BAL CD8+ T lymphocytes and PD20FEV1 (r = 0.84, P < 0.01). In conclusion, patients with B-CLL have a high prevalence of respiratory symptoms, small airway dysfunction and CD8 "alveolitis" related to airway responsiveness; despite the well-known lung interstitial lymphocyte infiltration in B-CLL, leukemic cells are not found in BAL fluid.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness after cervical spinal cord injury

Cervical spinal cord injury results in interruption of sympathetic airway innervation, which originates from the upper thoracic spine, whereas parasympathetic nerve supply, arising in the vagal nuclei of the brainstem, remains intact. To assess the effect of such an altered neural environment on airway reactivity, bronchoprovocation testing was performed on eight subjects with nonacute traumatic lesions of the cervical spine, all of whom were lifetime nonsmokers without history of respiratory symptoms prior to their injury. Bronchial challenge was subsequently repeated after pretreatment with the anticholinergic agent, ipratropium bromide, an inhibitor of airway muscarinic receptors. All subjects demonstrated hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (the concentration of methacholine producing a fall in FEV1 of 20 percent from baseline [PC20] = 1.42 +/- 1.61 [SD] mg/ml). Airway hyperreactivity was completely blocked by pretreatment with inhaled ipratropium bromide (mean PC20 > 25 mg/ml [p < 0.0001]). The bronchial hyperresponsiveness observed in this population most likely reflects the loss of sympathetic airway innervation and resultant unopposed cholinergic bronchoconstrictor tone which results from transection of the cervical spine. Blockade of methacholine hyperresponsiveness with ipratropium bromide suggests a muscarinic receptor-mediated phenomenon.     

The inhibition of yohimbine injected intrathecally on electroacupuncture-induced analgesia and release of beta-endorphin from rat brain

No study has investigated the effects of ethanol on bronchial responsiveness in patients with alcohol-induced asthma, although acetaldehyde, which is a metabolite of ethanol and is thought to be a main factor in alcohol-induced asthma, causes both bronchoconstriction and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. The purpose of this study was to investigate the direct action of ethanol on the airway in patients with alcohol-induced asthma. First, we investigated the bronchial response to inhalation of ascending doses (5, 10, and 20%) of ethanol in nine patients with alcohol-induced asthma. Then, the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was measured in 14 patients who were pretreated with saline or 20% ethanol in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Ascending doses of inhaled ethanol caused no significant changes in FEV1. The methacholine concentrations producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20-MCh) after 20% ethanol (0.769 mg/ml, GSEM 1.514) were significantly (P = 0.0357) higher than those after saline (0.493 mg/ml, GSEM 1.368). This indicates that ethanol has a reducing effect on nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with alcohol-induced asthma; this paper is the first report on the effects of ethanol on bronchial responsiveness.     

Scorpion stings in Spain. Popular therapies, proverbs and pharmacopoeias]

There is evidence that bronchial responsiveness to allergen is quantitatively correlated with bronchial responsiveness to nonspecific stimuli in subjects with allergic asthma. This association has been questioned in occupational asthma due to low molecular weight substances. It was the aim of this study to assess the quantitative association of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine (MCh) and platinum salts (Pt), in the form of hexachloroplatinic acid, in workers with occupational asthma due to platinum salts. Fifty seven subjects with exposure to Pt, work-related asthma, and a positive bronchial challenge with Pt, underwent skin prick tests with Pt and bronchial challenge with MCh. Using the provocation concentration causing a > or = 50% fall in specific airway conductance (PC50sGaw(Pt)) as dependent variable, anamnestic data (period from first symptoms to removal, period between removal from exposure and diagnosis, and smoking), season of the investigation, skin prick tests with environmental allergens, total immunoglobulin E (IgE), skin reactivity to Pt (Pt concentration causing a 2 mm wheal), and PC50sGaw(MCh) were included as independent variables for regression analysis. Fifty two subjects (91%) showed a PC50sGaw(MCh) < 8 mg.mL-1 (geometric mean for all subjects 1.6 mg.mL-1). Responsiveness to Pt varied widely between subjects (geometric mean of PC50sGaw 9 x 10-5 mol.L-1, range 2 x 10-7 to 10-2 mol.L-1). There was no univariate correlation between bronchial responsiveness to MCh and Pt, but there was a correlation between skin reactivity to Pt and PC50sGaw(Pt) (r = 0.6). This association could not be improved by considering PC50sGaw(MCh), the period from first symptoms to removal, or the period between removal from exposure and diagnosis. The parameters that showed the highest (negative) associations with PC50sGaw(Pt) were skin reactivity to Pt and the period between removal from exposure and diagnosis (r = 0.65). We conclude that there is a moderate association between bronchial responsiveness to platinum salts and skin reactivity to platinum salts. However, there is no association between methacholine responsiveness and bronchial responsiveness to allergen in occupational asthma due to platinum salts.     

The effect of inhaling a dry powder of sodium chloride on the airways of asthmatic subjects

Wet aerosols of 4.5% sodium chloride (NaCl) are often used to assess the bronchial responsiveness associated with asthma. We questioned whether dry NaCl could be used as an alternative. Dry powder NaCl was inhaled from capsules containing either 5, 10, 20 or 40 mg to a cumulative dose of 635 mg. The powder was delivered via an Inhalator or Halermatic. The airway sensitivity to the dry and wet NaCl was compared in 24 patients with asthma aged 19-39 yrs. All subjects responded to both preparations and the geometric mean (95% confidence intervals) for the provocative dose of NaCl causing forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) to fall 20% from baseline (PD[20,NaCl]) for dry NaCl was 103 mg (68-157) versus 172 mg (102-292), p<0.03 for the wet NaCl. The response to dry NaCl was reproducible and on repeat challenge the PD20 was 108 mg (75-153). The mean maximum fall in FEV1 was approximately 25% on each of the two test days. Spontaneous recovery occurred within 60 min after challenge with dry NaCl and within 5 min after bronchodilator. There were no serious side-effects requiring medical attention, however some patients coughed on inhalation of the 40 mg dose and three gagged. Arterial oxygen saturation remained within normal limits. We conclude that a suitably prepared dry powder of sodium chloride could potentially replace wet sodium chloride to assess bronchial responsiveness in patients with asthma, but further studies are required to establish the long-term stability of the dry powder preparation.     

Effect of age upon airway obstruction and reversibility in adult patients with asthma

OBJECTIVE: In a cross-sectional study we evaluated the effect of aging (separately from that of duration of disease) on airway obstruction and reversibility by comparing two groups of non-smoker patients with asthma. METHODS: We compared two groups of patients: group A, which had 50 subjects (8 men and 42 women) aged 59.7+/-4.6 years (mean +/- SD), and group B, comprised of 51 subjects (19 men and 32 women) who were 35.7+/-7.4 years old. The groups were selected because of comparable baseline degree of obstruction (FEV1 % of predicted, 67.8+/-20.3 in group A; 73.0+/-19.6 in group B, NS) and duration of the disease (14.0+/-11.7 years vs 11.2+/-9.1, NS). Spirometric examination, with a bronchodilator test, was performed and subjects not reaching 85% of predicted were submitted to a 4-week course of inhaled steroids. RESULTS: Although a higher number of subjects from group B responded to the acute bronchodilator test (p < 0.001), the maximum response achievable with treatment (steroid or bronchodilator) (deltaFEV1 expressed as the percent of predicted) was not statistically different between groups (12.0+/-17.5 vs 16.0+/-23.9). The mean FEV1 attainable after treatment (deltaFEV1%PT) was significantly lower in the older group (p = 0.0006). Within groups, the baseline FEV1% did not correlate with age; it was inversely correlated with the duration of the disease (p < 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively). In both groups deltaFEV1 was inversely related with the baseline FEV1, whereas FEV1%PT was correlated with the duration of the disease, with a slope nearly doubled in group B (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both the process of aging and the prolonged exposure to disease effects are important factors in determining the functional characteristics of chronic asthma: In particular, aging is associated not only with a reduced acute responsiveness to bronchodilators, but also with a reduced slope of the duration-FEV1%PT relationship that suggests a slowing of the rate of loss of reversibility of uncertain biological meaning.     

The detection of cytochrome P450 2E1 and its catalytic activity in rat testis

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler (MDPI, Leiras Taifun, Finland) with that of a same dose of salbutamol inhaled from a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer (pMDI + S) in protecting against methacholine (Mch) induced bronchoconstriction. This was a 3 day, randomized, cross-over, partly blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre study where the pMDI + S was used as an open control. Twenty-six asthmatic outpatients with a baseline FEV1 > or = 60% of predicted and with bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20 FEV1 < or = 890 micrograms of Mch) were studied. On each study day the patients underwent an Mch provocation 30 min after inhaling placebo from the MDPI or a dose of 100 micrograms of salbutamol from the MDPI and from the pMDI + S. PD20 FEV1 and dose-response slope [DRS; maximal change in FEV1 (%)/dose of Mch (mumol)] were used to evaluate efficacy. The median values of PD20 FEV1 were 250, 622 and 1737 micrograms after placebo MDPI, salbutamol pMDI + S and salbutamol MDPI, respectively. The corresponding DRS values were -11.0%, -4.5% and -2.0% mumol-1. With both parameters, all differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from Leiras Taifun MDPI offers better protection against Mch-induced bronchoconstriction than 100 micrograms of salbutamol from a pMDI connected to a large volume spacer device.