Biochemical interactions within a ternary complex of the bacteriophage T4 recombination proteins uvsY and gp32 bound to single-stranded DNA

The presynaptic phase of homologous recombination requires the formation of a filament of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) coated with a recombinase enzyme. In bacteriophage T4, at least three proteins are required for the assembly of this presynaptic filament. In addition to the T4 recombinase, uvsX protein, the T4 ssDNA binding protein (gp32), and the uvsY recombination accessory protein are also required. Here we report on a detailed analysis of a tripartite filament containing ssDNA bound by stoichiometric quantities of both uvsY and gp32, which appears to be an important intermediate in the assembly of the T4 presynaptic filament. We demonstrate that uvsY and gp32 simultaneously co-occupy the ssDNA in a noncompetitive fashion. In addition, we show that protein-protein interactions between uvsY and gp32 are not required for the assembly of this ternary complex and do not affect the affinity of uvsY for the ssDNA lattice. Finally, we demonstrate that the interaction of gp32 with the ssDNA is destabilized within this complex, in a manner which is independent of gp32-uvsY interactions. The data suggest that the uvsY protein acts to remodel the gp32-ssDNA complex via uvsY-ssDNA interactions. The implications of these findings for the mechanism of presynapsis in the T4 recombination system are discussed.     

Reduced postoperative analgesic demand after inhaled anesthesia in comparison to combined epidural-inhaled anesthesia in patients undergoing abdominal surgery

A central reaction in homologous recombination is synapsis, which involves invasion of duplex DNA by a homologous single strand. A key intermediate in this process is the presynaptic filament, a protein-DNA complex composed of a "strand transferase" polymerized along the invading single strand. In this report, the organization and mechanism of assembly of the bacteriophage T4 presynaptic filament are explored. Three T4 proteins, encoded by the uvsX, uvsY and 32 genes, are involved in this process. It is demonstrated that a well-defined series of events involving multiple protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions is required to mediate a transition from an initial gene 32-DNA complex to a mature presynaptic filament in which the UvsX and UvsY proteins are in contact with the DNA and each other, while most or all of the gene 32 protein is removed from the complex.     

Characterization of the oligomeric states of RecA protein: monomeric RecA protein can form a nucleoprotein filament

Self-assembly of RecA protein in solution and on single-stranded DNA exerts a significant effect on the catalytic activities of this protein. To manipulate the self-association reaction, we examined the effects of various salts on the self-association of RecA from Thermus thermophilus (ttRecA) by circular dichroism spectroscopy and gel-filtration analysis. We showed that the self-association of ttRecA strongly depends on the kind and concentration of the salt, as well as on the protein concentration. Chaotropic ions were especially useful for obtaining RecA in its hexameric and monomeric states. On the basis of these observations, we were able to regulate the oligomeric states of ttRecA and we then examined the activity of RecA in various oligomeric states. Monomeric ttRecA bound to ssDNA and formed a nucleoprotein filament, which showed ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity. These results suggest that the monomeric form of RecA is an intermediate in filament formation on ssDNA.     

Identification and characterization of the fourth single-stranded-DNA binding domain of replication protein A

Replication protein A (RPA), the heterotrimeric single-stranded-DNA (ssDNA) binding protein (SSB) of eukaryotes, contains two homologous ssDNA binding domains (A and B) in its largest subunit, RPA1, and a third domain in its second-largest subunit, RPA2. Here we report that Saccharomyces cerevisiae RPA1 contains a previously undetected ssDNA binding domain (domain C) lying in tandem with domains A and B. The carboxy-terminal portion of domain C shows sequence similarity to domains A and B and to the region of RPA2 that binds ssDNA (domain D). The aromatic residues in domains A and B that are known to stack with the ssDNA bases are conserved in domain C, and as in domain A, one of these is required for viability in yeast. Interestingly, the amino-terminal portion of domain C contains a putative Cys4-type zinc-binding motif similar to that of another prokaryotic SSB, T4 gp32. We demonstrate that the ssDNA binding activity of domain C is uniquely sensitive to cysteine modification but that, as with gp32, ssDNA binding is not strictly dependent on zinc. The RPA heterotrimer is thus composed of at least four ssDNA binding domains and exhibits features of both bacterial and phage SSBs.     

Visualisation of human rad52 protein and its complexes with hRad51 and DNA

The human Rad52 protein stimulates joint molecule formation by hRad51, a homologue of Escherichia coli RecA protein. Electron microscopic analysis of hRad52 shows that it self-associates to form ring structures with a diameter of approximately 10 nm. Each ring contains a hole at its centre. hRad52 binds to single and double-stranded DNA. In the ssDNA-hRad52 complexes, hRad52 was distributed along the length of the DNA, which exhibited a characteristic "beads on a string" appearance. At higher concentrations of hRad52, "super-rings" (approximately 30 nm) were observed and the ssDNA was collapsed upon itself. In contrast, in dsDNA-hRad52 complexes, some regions of the DNA remained protein-free while others, containing hRad52, interacted to form large protein-DNA networks. Saturating concentrations of hRad51 displaced hRad52 from ssDNA, whereas dsDNA-Rad52 complexes (networks) were more resistant to hRad51 invasion and nucleoprotein filament formation. When Rad52-Rad51-DNA complexes were probed with gold-conjugated hRad52 antibodies, the presence of globular hRad52 structures within the Rad51 nucleoprotein filament was observed. These data provide the first direct visualisation of protein-DNA complexes formed by the human Rad51 and Rad52 recombination/repair proteins.     

The DNA binding properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein

Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein is the paradigm for eukaryotic ATP-dependent DNA strand exchange proteins. To explain some of the unique characteristics of DNA strand exchange promoted by Rad51 protein, when compared with its prokaryotic homologue the Escherichia coli RecA protein, we analyzed the DNA binding properties of the Rad51 protein. Rad51 protein binds both single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in an ATP- and Mg2+-dependent manner, over a wide range of pH, with an apparent binding stoichiometry of approximately 1 protein monomer per 4 (+/-1) nucleotides or base pairs, respectively. Only dATP and adenosine 5'-gamma-(thiotriphosphate) (ATPgammaS) can substitute for ATP, but binding in the presence of ATPgammaS requires more than a 5-fold stoichiometric excess of protein. Without nucleotide cofactor, Rad51 protein binds both ssDNA and dsDNA but only at pH values lower than 6.8; in this case, the apparent binding stoichiometry covers the range of 1 protein monomer per 6-9 nucleotides or base pairs. Therefore, Rad51 protein displays two distinct modes of DNA binding. These binding modes are not inter-convertible; however, their initial selection is governed by ATP binding. On the basis of these DNA binding properties, we conclude that the main reason for the low efficiency of the DNA strand exchange promoted by Rad51 protein in vitro is its enhanced dsDNA-binding ability, which inhibits both the presynaptic and synaptic phases of the DNA strand exchange reaction as follows: during presynapsis, Rad51 protein interacts with and stabilizes secondary structures in ssDNA thereby inhibiting formation of a contiguous nucleoprotein filament; during synapsis, Rad51 protein inactivates the homologous dsDNA partner by directly binding to it.     

The human Rad51 protein: polarity of strand transfer and stimulation by hRP-A

The human Rad51 protein is homologous to the RecA protein and catalyses homologous pairing and strand transfer reactions in vitro. Using single-stranded circular and homologous linear duplex DNA, we show that hRad51 forms stable joint molecules by transfer of the 5' end of the complementary strand of the linear duplex to the ssDNA. The polarity of strand transfer is therefore 3' to 5', defined relative to the ssDNA on which hRad51 initiates filament formation. This polarity is opposite to that observed with RecA. Homologous pairing and strand transfer require stoichiometric amounts of hRad51, corresponding to one hRad51 monomer per three nucleotides of ssDNA. Joint molecules are not observed when the protein is present in limiting or excessive amounts. The human ssDNA binding-protein, hRP-A, stimulates hRad51-mediated reactions. Its effect is consistent with a role in the removal of secondary structures from ssDNA, thereby facilitating the formation of continuous Rad51 filaments.     

Protein interactions in genetic recombination in Escherichia coli. Interactions involving RecO and RecR overcome the inhibition of RecA by single-stranded DNA-binding protein

RecA promotes homologous pairing of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) with double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). This reaction occurs inefficiently if the ssDNA substrate is preincubated with Escherichia coli ssDNA-binding protein (SSB). However, RecO and RecR can act together as accessory factors for RecA to overcome this inhibition by SSB (Umezu, K., Chi, N.-W., and Kolodner, R. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 3875-3879). To elucidate the mechanism that underlies this process, we examined protein-protein interactions between RecA, RecF, RecO, RecR, and SSB, and characterized the structure and activity of the ssDNA complexes formed with different combinations of these proteins. We obtained the following results. (i) RecO physically interacts with both RecR and SSB. The interaction between RecO and SSB is stronger than the RecO-RecR interaction. (ii) RecO and RecR do not remove SSB from SSB.ssDNA complexes, but instead bind to these complexes. The resulting RecO.RecR.SSB.ssDNA complexes were more active in RecA-mediated joint molecule formation than were SSB.ssDNA complexes. (iii) RecA can nucleate on the RecO.RecR.SSB.ssDNA complexes more efficiently than on SSB.ssDNA complexes. (iv) When RecA presynaptic filaments were formed in the presence of SSB, RecO, and RecR, the protein-DNA complexes obtained contained 70% of the amount of RecA required to saturate ssDNA. These complexes, however, can mediate joint molecule formation and strand exchange as efficiently as presynaptic filaments which are fully saturated with RecA. Based on these results, we propose dual roles for RecO and RecR in joint molecule formation. First, RecO and RecR bind to SSB.ssDNA complexes and modify their structure to allow RecA to nucleate on them efficiently. Second, RecO and RecR are retained in RecA presynaptic filaments and play a role in the subsequent homologous pairing process promoted by RecA.     

Purification and characterization of XRad51.1 protein, Xenopus RAD51 homologue: recombinant XRad51.1 promotes strand exchange reaction

BACKGROUND: The RAD51 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is homologous to the Escherichia coli recA gene and plays a key role in genetic recombination and DNA double-strand break repair. To construct an improved experimental system of homologous recombination in higher eukaryotes, we have chosen the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis, whose egg extracts might be useful for the in vitro studies. We identified and characterized a Xenopus homologue of RAD51 gene, the XRAD51.1. RESULTS: Recombinant XRad51.1 was expressed in E. coli. The purified XRad51.1 protein showed ssDNA-dependent ATPase activity and promoted the DNA strand exchange reaction between two 55-mer oligonucleotides. The binding stoichiometry of XRad51.1 to ssDNA was determined by fluorescence of poly(d epsilonA), a chemically modified poly(dA), and was found to be about six bases/XRad51.1 monomer in a nucleoprotein filament, a similar value to E. coli RecA protein. The kinetics of the fluorescence change of poly(d epsilonA) after XRad51.1 binding in the presence of ATP was significantly different from that observed with RecA protein. The affinity of XRad51.1 to ssDNA in the presence of ATP was higher than that of RecA protein, and the dissociation of the XRad51.1-ssDNA complex was slower than the RecA-ssDNA complex. CONCLUSIONS: Purified recombinant XRad51.1 protein promoted the strand exchange between short DNA molecules. While the binding stoichiometry of XRad51.1 protein to ssDNA was identical to that of the RecA protein, XRad51.1 has a significantly higher affinity and binding stability to ssDNA than did the RecA protein in the presence of ATP.     

Bacteriophage T4 gp2 interferes with cell viability and with bacteriophage lambda Red recombination

The T4 head protein, gp2, promotes head-tail joining during phage morphogenesis and is also incorporated into the phage head. It protects the injected DNA from degradation by exonuclease V during the subsequent infection. In this study, we show that recombinant gp2, a very basic protein, rapidly kills the cells in which it is expressed. To further illustrate the protectiveness of gp2 for DNA termini, we compare the effect of gp2 expression on Red-mediated and Int-mediated recombination. Red-mediated recombination is nonspecific and requires the transient formation of double-stranded DNA termini. Int-mediated recombination, on the other hand, is site specific and does not require chromosomal termini. Red-mediated recombination is inhibited to a much greater extent than is Int-mediated recombination. We conclude from the results of these physiological and genetic experiments that T4 gp2 expression, like Mu Gam expression, kills bacteria by binding to double-stranded DNA termini, the most likely mode for its protection of entering phage DNA from exonuclease V.     

DNA annealing by RAD52 protein is stimulated by specific interaction with the complex of replication protein A and single-stranded DNA

Homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends critically on RAD52 function. In vitro, Rad52 protein preferentially binds single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), mediates annealing of complementary ssDNA, and stimulates Rad51 protein-mediated DNA strand exchange. Replication protein A (RPA) is a ssDNA-binding protein that is also crucial to the recombination process. Herein we report that Rad52 protein effects the annealing of RPA-ssDNA complexes, complexes that are otherwise unable to anneal. The ability of Rad52 protein to promote annealing depends on both the type of ssDNA substrate and ssDNA binding protein. RPA allows, but slows, Rad52 protein-mediated annealing of oligonucleotides. In contrast, RPA is almost essential for annealing of longer plasmid-sized DNA but has little effect on the annealing of poly(dT) and poly(dA), which are relatively long DNA molecules free of secondary structure. These results suggest that one role of RPA in Rad52 protein-mediated annealing is the elimination of DNA secondary structure. However, neither Escherichia coli ssDNA binding protein nor human RPA can substitute in this reaction, indicating that RPA has a second role in this process, a role that requires specific RPA-Rad52 protein interactions. This idea is confirmed by the finding that RPA, which is complexed with nonhomologous ssDNA, inhibits annealing but the human RPA-ssDNA complex does not. Finally, we present a model for the early steps of the repair of double-strand DNA breaks in yeast.     

DNA strand invasion promoted by Escherichia coli RecT protein

The RecT protein of Escherichia coli is a DNA-pairing protein required for the RecA-independent recombination events promoted by the RecE pathway. The RecT protein was found to bind to both single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) and double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) in the absence of Mg2+. In the presence of Mg2+, RecT binding to dsDNA was inhibited drastically, whereas binding to ssDNA was inhibited only to a small extent. RecT promoted the transfer of a single-stranded oligonucleotide into a supercoiled homologous duplex to form a D (displacement)-loop. D-loop formation occurred in the absence of Mg2+ and at 1 mM Mg2+ but was inhibited by increasing concentrations of Mg2+ and did not require a high energy cofactor. Strand transfer was mediated by a RecT-ssDNA nucleoprotein complex reacting with a naked duplex DNA and was prevented by the formation of RecT-dsDNA nucleoprotein complexes. Finally, RecT mediated the formation of joint molecules between a supercoiled DNA and a linear dsDNA substrate with homologous 3'-single-stranded tails. Together these results indicate that RecT is not a helix-destabilizing protein promoting a reannealing reaction but rather is a novel type of pairing protein capable of promoting recombination by a DNA strand invasion mechanism. These results are consistent with the observation that RecE (exonuclease VIII) and RecT can promote RecA-independent double-strand break repair in E. coli.     

Characterization of a cooperativity domain mutant Lys3 --> Ala (K3A) T4 gene 32 protein

The N-terminal "B" domain of T4 gene 32 protein contains a Lys3-Arg4-Lys5 sequence that has been postulated to provide a major determinant for cooperative binding. In this report, the equilibrium binding properties of a Lys3 --> Ala substitution mutant of gp32 (K3A gp32) and described and compared to a set of substitution mutants of Arg4 previously described (Villemain, J. L., and Giedroc, D. P. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 11235-11246) and further characterized here. K3A gp32 exhibits binding behavior which mirrors that of R4Q gp32. Despite an 6-8-fold decrease in overall binding affinity (Kapp = Kint x omega) at pH 8.1, 0.20 M NaCl, 20 degrees C, the magnitude of the cooperativity parameter is at most 2-3-fold smaller than that of the wild-type protein. The magnitude of omega is independent of salt concentration and type over the range in [NaCl] from 0.125 to 0. 225 M and [NaF] between 0.20 and 0.32 M (log omega = 2.86 +/- 0.19). For comparison, log omega for wild-type gp32 is 2.91 (+/- 0.21) resolved at 0.275 M NaCl and 3.39 +/- 0.11 in [NaF] between 0.40 and 0.45 M. In contrast to omega, the [NaCl] dependence of Kapp is large and markedly nonlinear for both wild-type and K3A gp32s over a [NaCl] range extending from 0.05 M to 0.40 M NaCl. Modeling of the complete salt dependence of Kapp for wild-type, K3A, and R4T gp32s in NaCl and NaF with a simple ion-exchange model suggests that substitutions within the basic Lys3-Arg4-Lys5 sequence do not strongly modulate the net displacement of cations and anions upon poly(A) complex formation by gp32.     

Stimulation by Rad52 of yeast Rad51-mediated recombination

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the RAD51 and RAD52 genes are involved in recombination and in repair of damaged DNA. The RAD51 gene is a structural and functional homologue of the recA gene and the gene product participates in strand exchange and single-stranded-DNA-dependent ATP hydrolysis by means of nucleoprotein filament formation. The RAD52 gene is important in RAD51-mediated recombination. Binding of this protein to Rad51 suggests that they cooperate in recombination. Homologues of both Rad51 and Rad52 are conserved from yeast to humans, suggesting that the mechanisms used for pairing homologous DNA molecules during recombination may be universal in eukaryotes. Here we show that Rad52 protein stimulates Rad51 reactions and that binding to Rad51 is necessary for this stimulatory effect. We conclude that this binding is crucial in recombination and that it facilitates the formation of Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments.     

Probing of DNA-binding sites of Escherichia coli RecA protein utilizing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid

RecA protein of Escherichia coli plays an essential role in homologous recombination of DNA strands. To analyze the interaction of RecA with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), we performed a fluorescence competition assay employing 1-anilinonaphthalene-8-sulfonic acid (ANS) as an extrinsic fluorescent probe. ANS bound to RecA at three sites, leading to enhancement of ANS fluorescence. Addition of synthetic polynucleotides to the RecA-ANS complex in the absence of a nucleotide quenched the ANS fluorescence, indicating displacement of ANS molecules by ssDNA. Less effective quenching by poly(dA) suggests that the nucleoprotein filament on poly(dA) may differ from those on poly(dT) and poly(dC). A titration experiment with poly(dT) and poly(dA) showed clear stoichiometric binding of 3.5 nucleotides per protein. The site size for poly(dC) was 7.0, which could be explained by the formation of a double helix of poly(dC). ATP and other nucleotides also displaced the ANS. To identify ANS-binding sites, ANS was incorporated into RecA by UV irradiation, and fluorescent peptides were isolated from the proteolytic digest. Sequence analysis suggested that ANS binds to or near the ATP-binding region. These results suggest that the fluorescence quenching and photoincorporation assay using ANS may be useful for the analysis of the interaction of a protein and its ligand.     

Modulation of RecA nucleoprotein function by the mutagenic UmuD'C protein complex

The RecA, UmuC, and UmuD' proteins are essential for error-prone, replicative bypass of DNA lesions. Normally, RecA protein mediates homologous pairing of DNA. We show that purified Umu(D')2C blocks this recombination function. Biosensor measurements establish that the mutagenic complex binds to the RecA nucleoprotein filament with a stoichiometry of one Umu(D')2C complex for every two RecA monomers. Furthermore, Umu(D')2C competitively inhibits LexA repressor cleavage but not ATPase activity, implying that Umu(D')2C binds in or proximal to the helical groove of the RecA nucleoprotein filament. This binding reduces joint molecule formation and even more severely impedes DNA heteroduplex formation by RecA protein, ultimately blocking all DNA pairing activity and thereby abridging participation in recombination function. Thus, Umu(D')2C restricts the activities of the RecA nucleoprotein filament and presumably, in this manner, recruits it for mutagenic repair function. This modulation by Umu(D')2C is envisioned as a key event in the transition from a normal mode of genomic maintenance by "error-free" recombinational repair, to one of "error-prone" DNA replication.     

The RPA32 subunit of human replication protein A contains a single-stranded DNA-binding domain

Replication protein A (RPA) is a conserved nuclear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA)-binding protein. Human RPA (hRPA) comprises three subunits of approximately 70, 32, and 14 kDa (hRPA70, hRPA32 and hRPA14). RPA is known to bind ssDNA through two ssDNA-binding domains in the RPA70 subunit. Here, we demonstrate that the complex of hRPA32 and hRPA14 has an ssDNA-binding domain. Limited proteolysis of the hRPA14.32 complex defined a core dimer composed of the central region of hRPA32 (amino acids 43-171) and RPA14. The core dimer bound ssDNA with an affinity of approximately 10-50 microM, which is at least 100-fold more avid than the DNA-binding affinity of the intact dimer. Analysis of the predicted secondary structure of hRPA32 suggests that amino acids 63-150 of hRPA32 form an ssDNA-binding domain similar in structure to each of those in hRPA70. The complex of hRPA14 and hRPA32-(43-171) in turn formed a trimeric complex with the C-terminal region of hRPA70 (amino acids 436-616). The ssDNA-binding affinity of this trimeric complex was 3 to 5-fold higher than hRPA14.32-(43-171) alone, suggesting a role for the C terminus of hRPA70 in ssDNA binding.     

The adenovirus DNA binding protein enhances intermolecular DNA renaturation but inhibits intramolecular DNA renaturation

The Adenovirus DNA binding protein (DBP) imposes a regular, rigid and extended conformation on single stranded DNA (ssDNA) and removes secondary structure. Here we show that DBP promotes renaturation of complementary single DNA strands. Enhancement of intermolecular renaturation is sequence independent, can be observed over a broad range of ionic conditions and occurs only when the DNA strands are completely covered with DBP. When one strand of DNA is covered with DBP and its complementary strand with T4 gene 32 protein, renaturation is still enhanced compared to protein-free DNA, indicating that the structures of both protein-DNA complexes are compatible for renaturation. In contrast to promoting intermolecular renaturation, DBP strongly inhibits intramolecular renaturation required for the formation of a panhandle from an ssDNA molecule with an inverted terminal repeat. We explain this by the rigidity of an ssDNA-DBP complex. These results will be discussed in view of the crystal structure of DBP that has recently been determined.     

Targeted recombination with single-stranded DNA vectors in mammalian cells

We studied the ability of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) to participate in targeted recombination in mammalian cells. A 5' end-deleted adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (aprt) gene was subcloned into M13 vector, and the resulting ssDNA and its double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) were transfected to APRT-Chinese hamster ovary cells with a deleted aprt gene. APRT+ recombinants with the ssDNA was obtained at a frequency of 3 x 10(-7) per survivor, which was almost equal to that with the double-stranded equivalent. Analysis of the genome in recombinant clones produced by ssDNA revealed that 12 of 14 clones resulted from correction of the deletion in the aprt locus. On the other hand, the locus of the remaining 2 was not corrected; instead, the 5' deletion of the vector was corrected by end extension, followed by integration into random sites of the genome. To exclude the possibility that input ssDNA was converted into its duplex form before participating in a recombination reaction, we compared the frequency of extrachromosomal recombination between noncomplementary ssDNAs, and between one ssDNA and one dsDNA, of two phage vectors. The frequency with the ssDNAs was 0.4 x 10(-5), being 10-fold lower than that observed with the ssDNA and the dsDNA, suggesting that as little as 10% of the transfected ssDNA was converted into duplex forms before the recombination event, hence 90% remained unchanged as single-stranded molecules. Nevertheless, the above finding that ssDNA was as efficient as dsDNA in targeted recombination suggests that ssDNA itself is able to participate directly in targeted recombination reactions in mammalian cells.     

The 32- and 14-kilodalton subunits of replication protein A are responsible for species-specific interactions with single-stranded DNA

Replication protein A (RPA) is a multisubunit single-stranded DNA-binding (ssDNA) protein that is required for cellular DNA metabolism. RPA homologues have been identified in all eukaryotes examined. All homologues are heterotrimeric complexes with subunits of approximately 70, approximately 32, and approximately 14 kDa. While RPA homologues are evolutionarily conserved, they are not functionally equivalent. To gain a better understanding of the functional differences between RPA homologues, we analyzed the DNA-binding parameters of RPA from human cells and the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (hRPA and scRPA, respectively). Both yeast and human RPA bind ssDNA with high affinity and low cooperativity. However, scRPA has a larger occluded binding site (45 nucleotides versus 34 nucleotides) and a higher affinity for oligothymidine than hRPA. Mutant forms of hRPA and scRPA containing the high-affinity DNA-binding domain from the 70-kDa subunit had nearly identical DNA binding properties. In contrast, subcomplexes of the 32- and 14-kDa subunits from both yeast and human RPA had weak ssDNA binding activity. However, the binding constants for the yeast and human subcomplexes were 3 and greater than 6 orders of magnitude lower than those for the RPA heterotrimer, respectively. We conclude that differences in the activity of the 32- and 14-kDa subunits of RPA are responsible for variations in the ssDNA-binding properties of scRPA and hRPA. These data also indicate that hRPA and scRPA have different modes of binding to ssDNA, which may contribute to the functional disparities between the two proteins.