Is percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in chronic total coronary occlusion justified? Long term results in a series of 201 patients

Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total coronary occlusions has a low primary success rate and is associated with a high percentage of restenosis. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the long-term benefits of these procedures. In a series of 201 patients with 203 chronic total occlusions, the technical success rate was 51%, the clinical success rate was 46% with 3% of major complications. The only factor associated with a favourable outcome was the presumed duration of the occlusion. The clinical follow-up period was established at 6 years. The result of the initial procedure was used to establish two groups of patients: group I, clinical success, and group II, clinical failure. Patients in group I had a probability of survival greater than that of those in group II (97 vs 92%; p < 0.05); survival without coronary bypass surgery was also significantly better (89 vs 74%; p < 0.003). On the other hand, the probability without angioplasty was less in group I (70 vs 77%; p < 0.01), the result of a high restenosis rate (48%). A Cox analysis identified clinical success of angioplasty as a good prognostic factor for survival. Moreover, the clinical status at long-term was significantly better in patients in group I. These results indicate that in patients with chronic total coronary occlusions, the success of angioplasty has a favourable effect on long-term outcome both in terms of survival and in quality of life. They must be interpreted in the light of the limitations inherent in a retrospective study and should be confirmed by prospective trials.     

Excimer laser angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty in functional and total coronary occlusions

Registries of excimer laser coronary angioplasty have reported good results in the treatment of complex coronary artery disease, including total or subtotal coronary occlusions. One hundred three patients (103 lesions) with a functional or total coronary occlusion were included in a randomized trial (Amsterdam-Rotterdam [AMRO] trial, total of 308 patients), 49 patients were allocated to laser angioplasty and 54 patients to balloon angioplasty. The primary clinical end points were death, myocardial infarction, coronary bypass surgery, or repeated coronary angioplasty of the randomized segment during a 6-month follow-up period. The primary angiographic end point was the minimal lumen diameter at follow-up in relation to the baseline value (net gain), as determined by an automated contour-detection algorithm. Laser angioplasty was followed by balloon angioplasty in all procedures. The angiographic success rate was 65% in patients treated with excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty compared with 61% in patients treated with balloon angioplasty alone. No deaths occurred. There were no significant differences between the laser angioplasty group and the balloon angioplasty group in the incidence of myocardial infarctions (1 patient vs 3, respectively, p = 0.36), coronary bypass surgery (4 patients vs 2, respectively, p = 0.34), repeat angioplasty (10 patients vs 8, respectively, p = 0.46) or primary clinical end point (15 patients vs 12, respectively, p = 0.34). The net gain in minimal lumen diameter and restenosis rate (>50% diameter stenosis at follow-up) were 0.81 +/- 0.74 mm and 66.7%, respectively, in patients treated with laser angioplasty compared with 1.04 +/- 0.68 mm and 48.5%, respectively, in patients treated with balloon angioplasty (p = 0.59 and p = 0.15, respectively). Excimer laser-assisted balloon angioplasty demonstrated no benefit over balloon angioplasty with respect to initial and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in the treatment of patients with functional or total coronary occlusions of >10 mm in length.     

Impact of diabetes mellitus on percutaneous revascularization (CAVEAT-I). CAVEAT-I Investigators. Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial

We examined the relation between diabetes mellitus and outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization in the Coronary Angioplasty Versus Excisional Atherectomy Trial (CAVEAT-I), a randomized trial comparing treatment with either percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or directional atherectomy for de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Acute success and complication rates, 6-month angiographic restenosis rates, and 1-year clinical outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing each procedure. Acute success rates between diabetic (n = 191) and nondiabetic (n = 821) patients were similar for both revascularization techniques. Except for the need for dialysis, complication rates were also similar. Six months after atherectomy, diabetic patients had significantly more angiographic restenosis than nondiabetics (59.7% vs 47.4%) and significantly smaller minimum luminal diameters (1.20 vs 1.40 mm). Diabetics undergoing atherectomy required more frequent bypass surgery (12.8% vs 8.5%) and more repeat percutaneous revascularizations (36.5% vs 28.1%) than nondiabetics undergoing atherectomy. Restenosis rates, minimum luminal diameters and repeat revascularizations between diabetics and nondiabetics undergoing angioplasty were similar. The higher restenosis and repeat revascularization rates and the smaller minimum luminal diameter at follow-up in diabetic patients suggest that atherectomy may provide only modest benefit for these patients. The increased restenosis rate in diabetics undergoing atherectomy (but not angioplasty) requires further evaluation.     

Procedural results and late clinical outcomes following multivessel coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes in a large consecutive series of patients undergoing percutaneous multivessel stent intervention. BACKGROUND: High restenosis and recurrent angina rates have limited the clinical outcomes of multivessel coronary angioplasty before stents were available to improve angioplasty results. METHODS: We evaluated in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes (death, Q-wave myocardial infarction [MI], and repeat revascularization rates at one year) in 398 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in two (94% of patients) or three native arteries, compared to 1,941 patients undergoing stenting procedure in a single coronary artery between January 1, 1994 and August 29, 1997. RESULTS: Overall procedural success was obtained in 96% of patients with two- or three-vessel stenting and in 970% of patients with single-vessel stent intervention (p = 0.36). Procedural complications were also similar (3.8% for multivessel versus 2.9% for single vessel, p = 0.14). During follow up, target lesion revascularization was 15% in multivessel and 16% in single-vessel interventions (p = 0.38), and repeat revascularization (calculated per treated patient) was also similar for both groups (20% vs. 21%, p = 0.73). There was no difference in death (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.26), and Q-wave MI (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) was lower following multivessel interventions. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (p = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Unlike previous conventional angioplasty experiences, multivessel stenting has (1) similar in-hospital procedural success and major complication rates and (2) similar long-term (one year) clinical outcomes compared with single-vessel stenting. Thus, stents may be a viable therapeutic strategy in carefully selected patients with multivessel coronary disease.     

Effects of different protective agents on the phototoxicity of fluoranthene to Daphnia magna

OBJECTIVE: To determine if a risk prediction model for patients with unstable angina would predict resource utilization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four hundred sixty-five consecutive patients admitted for unstable angina to a tertiary care university-based medical center were prospectively evaluated from June 1, 1992, to June 30, 1995. The proportion of patients receiving coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty, and coronary artery bypass grafting were analyzed according to four risk groups on the basis of a previously published model: Group 1, <2% risk of major complication; Group 2, 2.1% to 5% risk; Group 3, 5.1 % to 15% risk; and Group 4, >15.1 % risk. Hospital length of stay and estimated cost of hospitalization based on DRG and specific payer ratio of cost-to-charge were also compared between groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the influence of estimated risk and procedures on hospital costs. The four groups were well matched for gender, hypertension, tobacco history, and previous percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and myocardial infarction. Group 4 had a higher incidence of previous coronary bypass grafting (35% vs 10%, p=0.001) and triple vessel or left main coronary artery disease compared with Group 1 (44% vs 13%, p=0.041). Group 4 patients were more likely to be admitted to the coronary care unit compared with Group 2 or Group 1 patients (80% vs Group 1: 51% [p= 0.001]; and vs Group 2: 53% [p=0.001]), more likely to receive heparin (87% vs 71%, p=0.007), and more likely to receive a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker (89% vs 74%, p=0.008) than Group 1. Coronary angioplasty rates were similar for all groups, but Group 4 patients were more likely to receive coronary bypass grafting than Group 2 or Group 1 (27% vs Group 2: 12%, p=0.004 and vs Group 1: 8%, p=0.002). Hospital length of stay was highest in Group 4 and lowest for Group 1. Average hospital costs were significantly less in Group 3 than in Group 4, but higher than in Group 1. Multivariate analysis determined a dependency of costs on risk group with Group 2 having costs 31.4% (95% CI=9.8 to 57.2), Group 3 46.7% (24, 3 to 73.1), and Group 4 75% (46.9 to 110.7) higher than Group 1. The use of procedures also significantly increased costs, with PTCA-treated patients having a 44.9% (26.7 to 65.7) increase in costs compared with medically treated patients, and surgically treated patients having a 204.7% increase in costs. CONCLUSION: Resource utilization as assessed by the use of revascularization procedures, length of stay, and hospital costs are influenced by patient acuity estimated from a prediction model on the basis of estimated risk of cardiac complications. The model exerts independent influence on cost even after adjustment for various procedures. The use of revascularization procedures, especially coronary artery surgery, remains a large determinant of hospital cost.     

Cytochrome P450 2E1 mRNA in the rat prostate: detection and quantitation by competitive reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction

Conventional balloon angioplasty treatment of aorto-ostial stenoses in native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts is associated with a low primary success rate, a high complication rate and a high incidence of restenosis. The short-term outcome of Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in aorto-ostial lesions was compared with that of balloon angioplasty. Thirteen patients underwent stent implantation for 13 de novo lesions (four in the left main coronary trunk, two in the right coronary artery, seven in the vein graft) between January 1994 and December 1995. Fourteen patients underwent balloon angioplasty for 14 de novo lesions (five in the left main coronary trunk, four in the right coronary artery, five in the vein graft between January 1986 and April 1992. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics. Initial success was obtained in all patients in the stent group, compared with 71% of the balloon angioplasty group. Insufficient dilation was the main cause for such failure in the balloon angioplasty group. Baseline reference diameters were similar (3.40 +/- 0.65 mm in the stent group vs 3.36 +/- 0.42 mm in the balloon angioplasty group) and there was no difference in baseline minimal luminal diameter (1.41 +/- 0.74 vs 1.08 +/- 0.56 mm). Minimal luminal diameter was significantly greater in the stent group than in the balloon angioplasty group at both post-procedure and follow-up examinations (post: 3.36 +/- 0.58 vs 2.69 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.01; follow-up: 2.33 +/- 0.96 vs 1.52 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05). There was no subacute occlusion in either group. The overall angiographic restenosis rate (> 50% stenosis) was lower in the stent group (17%) than in the balloon angioplasty group: the restenosis rates of native lesions were 0% in the stent group and 40% in the balloon angioplasty group; those of saphenous vein graft lesions were 33% in the stent group and 50% in the balloon angioplasty group. Although the number of patients was limited, these results suggest that Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation may be a safe and effective strategy for treating aorto-ostial lesions in both native coronary arteries and saphenous vein grafts.     

Randomized trial of direct coronary angioplasty versus intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to obtain preliminary data on the relative clinical utility of direct coronary angioplasty compared with that of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction. BACKGROUND: The relative merits of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and direct coronary angioplasty as treatment for acute myocardial infarction are incompletely understood, and randomized trials of these treatments have been extremely limited. METHODS: One hundred patients with ST segment elevation presenting to a single high volume interventional center within 6 h of the onset of chest pain were randomized to receive either streptokinase (1.2 million U intravenously over 1 h) or immediate catheterization and direct coronary angioplasty. Patients were excluded for age > or = 75 years, prior bypass surgery, Q wave infarction in the region of ischemia or excessive risk of bleeding. All patients were then treated with aspirin (325 mg orally/day) and heparin (1,000 U intravenously/h) for 48 h until catheterization was performed to determine the primary study end point, namely, infarct-related artery patency at 48 h. Secondary end points were in-hospital death, left ventricular ejection fraction at 48 h and time to treatment. RESULTS: There was no difference in the baseline characteristics of the two treatment groups. Overall patient age was 56 +/- 10 years, 83% of patients were male, 11% had prior infarction, 40% had anterior infarction and 97% were in Killip class I or II. Although time to treatment was delayed in the angioplasty group (238 +/- 112 vs. 179 +/- 98 min, p = 0.005), there was no difference in 48-h infarct-related artery patency or left ventricular ejection fraction (patency 74% vs. 80%; ejection fraction 59 +/- 13% vs. 57 +/- 13%; angioplasty vs. streptokinase, p = NS for both). There were no major bleeding events, and the mortality rate with angioplasty (6%) and streptokinase (2%) did not differ (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that intravenous thrombolytic therapy might be preferred over coronary angioplasty for most patients because of the often shorter time to treatment.     

Revascularization in patients with prior coronary bypass surgery

Increasingly over the past several years, patients have returned after coronary surgery for reintervention procedures. This reflects immediate postsurgical complications and the relentless progression of coronary artery disease in the native circulation and in the bypass grafts. Although there are randomized comparative data for coronary bypass surgery (CABG) versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and medical therapy, these trials have always excluded patients with previous (GABG). OBJECTIVES: We attempted to compare the risks and benefits of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and repeat coronary artery bypass grafting (re-CABG) in patients with previous coronary bypass surgery (CABG). METHODS AND RESULTS: This study examines follow up data (15.4 +/- 11.0 months) from 130 patients with previous CABG, who required either PTCA (Group A, n = 73) or re-CABG (Group B; n = 57) at a single center from 1994 to 1997. Follow up data were obtained from subsequent office visits and telephone calls. The PTCA and re-CABG groups were similar with respect to gender (86% vs 94% males), mean age (62 +/- 9 vs 59 +/- 10 years), angina CCS classes 3 and 4 (73% vs 69%), diminished left ventricular function (23% vs 26%), risk factors such as diabetes (19% vs 17%), hypercolesterolemia (49% vs 45%) and smoking (48% vs 39%) and three-vessel native coronary artery disease (67% vs 72%). The symptomatic status prior to the revascularization procedure was similar in both groups. Complete and functional revascularization was achieved in 85% of the PTCA group and in 92% of those with re-CABG (p = NS). During the hospital stay the complication rates were lower in the PTCA group. Actuarial survival was different at follow up (p = 0.04). Both PTCA and re-CABG groups resulted in equivalent event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina and urgent revascularization). The need for repeat revascularization at follow up was significantly higher in the PTCA group (PTCA 28% vs re-CABG 10%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In this non-randomized study of patients with previous CABG requiring revascularization procedures, PTCA resulted in lower procedural morbidity and mortality risks. At follow up, both PTCA or CABG were similar for event-free survival; PTCA offered lower overall mortality, although it is associated to a greater need for subsequent revascularization procedures.     

Comparison of balloon angioplasty versus debulking devices versus stenting in right coronary ostial lesions

Angioplasty of aorto-ostial stenosis is associated with lower procedural success and a higher complication rate. The aim of the present study was to compare the acute and long-term results of balloon and new device angioplasty in 110 consecutive patients with right coronary ostial lesions. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the angioplasty device used: group I (balloon only, n = 26), group II (debulking devices including excimer laser, directional and rotational atherectomy, n = 26), group III (stent, n = 58). Procedural success was highest in group III (96%) followed by group I (88%), and group II (77%). In-hospital complications were similar among the groups (p = NS). Patients in group III achieved the highest acute gain (2.61 mm) followed by groups II (1.92 mm), and I (1.39 mm, p <0.05). During follow up, target lesion revascularization and/or bypass surgery was required in 24% of patients in group III compared with 47% and 40% in groups I and II, respectively (p <0.05). Cardiac-event free survival was highest in the stent group (74%, p <0.005) and was similar between the balloon (39%) and debulking device groups (45%). Thus, among the currently available technologies, stenting of right coronary ostial lesions appears to provide excellent angiographic and long-term results.     

Mechanical debulking versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of true bifurcation lesions

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate angiographic and long-term results of debulking versus balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation lesions. BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown true bifurcation lesions to be a high risk morphological subset for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Although atherectomy devices have been used to treat bifurcation lesions, no studies have compared the outcomes of these alternative treatment modalities. METHODS: Between January 1992 and May 1997, we treated 70 consecutive patients with true bifurcation lesions (defined as a greater than 50% stenosis in both the parent vessel and contiguous side branch) with conventional PTCA (n = 30) or debulking (with rotational or directional atherectomy) plus adjunctive PTCA (n = 40). Paired angiograms were analyzed by quantitative angiography, and clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was 73% in the PTCA group and 97% in the debulking group (p = 0.01). Major in-hospital complications occurred in two patients in the PTCA group and one in the debulking group. Treatment with atherectomy plus PTCA resulted in lower postprocedure residual stenoses than PTCA alone (16+/-15% vs. 33+/-17% in the parent vessel, and 6+/-15% vs. 39+/-22% in the side branch; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). At 1 year follow-up, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR) was 53% in the PTCA group as compared with 28% in the debulking group (p = 0.05). Independent predictors of the need for repeat TVR were side branch diameter >2.3 mm, longer lesion lengths, and treatment with PTCA alone. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of true bifurcation lesions, atherectomy with adjunctive PTCA is safe, improves acute angiographic results, and decreases target vessel revascularization compared to PTCA alone. The benefits of debulking for bifurcation lesions were especially seen in lesions involving large side branches.     

The relation between multiple sleep latency test findings and the frequency of apneic events in REM and non-REM sleep

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the immediate results and the 6-month angiographic recurrent restenosis rate after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis. BACKGROUND: Despite excellent immediate and mid-term results, 20% to 30% of patients with coronary stent implantation will present an angiographic restenosis and may require additional treatment. The optimal treatment for in-stent restenosis is still unclear. METHODS: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) analyses were performed before and after stent implantation, before and after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis and on a 6-month systematic coronary angiogram to assess the recurrent angiographic restenosis rate. RESULTS: Balloon angioplasty was performed in 52 patients presenting in-stent restenosis. In-stent restenosis was either diffuse (> or =10 mm) inside the stent (71%) or focal (29%). Mean stent length was 16+/-7 mm. Balloon diameter of 2.98+/-0.37 mm and maximal inflation pressure of 10+/-3 atm were used for balloon angioplasty. Angiographic success rate was 100% without any complication. Acute gain was lower after balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis than after stent implantation: 1.19+/-0.60 mm vs. 1.75+/-0.68 mm (p=0.0002). At 6-month follow-up, 60% of patients were asymptomatic and no patient died. Eighteen patients (35%) had repeat target vessel revascularization. Angiographic restenosis rate was 54%. Recurrent restenosis rate was higher when in-stent restenosis was diffuse: 63% vs. 31% when focal, p=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: Although balloon angioplasty for in-stent restenosis can be safely and successfully performed, it leads to less immediate stenosis improvement than at time of stent implantation and carries a high recurrent angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months, in particular in diffuse in-stent restenosis lesions.     

Procedural outcome and follow-up results of balloon angioplasty versus new device interventions for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses

Strategies for dilatation of bifurcation stenoses have continued to evolve over the past several years. However, there is limited experience on the efficacy of various nonballoon interventional devices and their results in comparison with balloon angioplasty. We, therefore, analysed our data in 72 patients of coronary artery disease with true bifurcation stenoses with balloon angioplasty or new device interventions (NDI). All patients underwent dilatation of both the primary vessel and side branch ostial stenosis. Balloon angioplasty using double guidewire with sequential or simultaneous (kissing balloon) balloon inflation in the two vessels was performed in 42 patients. Thirty patients underwent NDI, using directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) in 12, rotablation in 6 and elective coronary stents in 12 patients. There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and angiographic variables between patients in the two groups. While the preprocedural luminal diameter stenosis was similar, the residual stenosis was significantly less, both in the primary vessel and side branch, after NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. The procedure was successful in 96.6 percent patients treated with NDI and 83.3 percent with balloon angioplasty (p < 0.01) with relief of obstruction in both branches without any major complications. Freedom from subsequent coronary events in the form of angina, myocardial infarction, PTCA, bypass graft surgery of death was significantly more, both at 6 months (92% versus 65.6%, p < 0.001) and 12 months (81.8% versus 53.1%, p < 0.001) in the group of patients treated with NDI compared to balloon angioplasty. It is, therefore, concluded that NDI including DCA, rotablation and elective stenting are associated with higher rate of success, lesser complications and better event-free survival in comparison to balloon angioplasty for treatment of true bifurcation stenoses.     

Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to examine whether oversized implantation of the new, less shortening Wallstent provides a more favorable long-term clinical and angiographic outcome in chronic total occlusions than does conventional coronary balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Restenosis and reocclusion remain major limitations of balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions. Enforced mechanical remodeling by implantation of the oversized Wallstent may prevent elastic recoil and improve accommodation of intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Lumen dimension was measured by a computer-based quantitative coronary angiography system (CAAS II). These measurements (before and after intervention and at 6-month follow-up) were compared between the groups with Wallstent implantation (20 lesions, 20 patients) and conventional balloon angioplasty (266 lesions, 249 patients) for treatment of chronic total occlusion. Acute gain (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that before intervention), late loss (minimal lumen diameter after intervention minus that at follow-up) and net gain (acute gain minus late loss) were examined. RESULTS: Wallstent deployment was successful in all patients. High pressure intra-Wallstent balloon inflation (mean +/- SD 14 +/- 3 atm) was performed in all lesions. Although vessel size did not differ between the Wallstent and balloon angioplasty groups, acute gain was significantly greater in the Wallstent group (2.96 +/- 0.55 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.34 mm, p < 0.0001). Although late loss was also significantly larger in the Wallstent group (0.81 +/- 0.95 vs. 0.43 +/- 0.68 mm, p < 0.05), net gain was still significantly greater in this group (2.27 +/- 1.00 vs. 1.18 +/- 0.69 mm, p < 0.0001). Angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter stenosis) occurred at 6 months in 29% of lesions in the Wallstent group and in 45% of those in the balloon angioplasty group (p = 0.5150). CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the oversized Wallstent, with full coverage of the lesion length, ensures resetting of the vessel size to its original caliber before disease and allows greater accommodation of intimal hyperplasia and chronic vessel recoil. Wallstent implantation provides a more favorable short- and long-term clinical and angiographic outcome than does conventional balloon angioplasty for chronic total occlusions.     

Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stenting

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown that multivessel coronary angioplasty is feasible and provides similar long-term survival as bypass surgery in selected patients. However, the higher need for repeat intervention, in particular, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, remains a problem. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that multivessel stenting is safe and effective in reducing the need for repeat interventions, in particular, the need for bypass surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between March 1993 and June 1995, 100 consecutive patients (243 lesions) had multivessel coronary stenting. High-pressure stent optimization was used in all patients. Procedural success was achieved in 97% of lesions; 2 patients (2%) required emergency bypass surgery. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 89% of patients at 5.2+/-2.5 months. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 22% of the lesions, but 37% of patients had > or = 1 lesion with restenosis. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 21 +/- 10 months: target lesion revascularization was needed in 30 patients (30%), repeat angioplasty in 28 patients (28%) and coronary bypass surgery in 2 patients (2%); the overall survival rate was 96% (2% noncardiac death). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel coronary stenting can be performed with high success rate and low need for emergency bypass surgery. Compared with historical results with multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, patients who undergo multivessel stenting need less repeat interventions, in particular, less coronary bypass surgery and have similar long-term survival.     

One-year outcomes of diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

Risk factors and outcomes associated with non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) in diabetics and nondiabetics were analyzed for 376 consecutive patients, 77 with diabetes (20%) and 299 nondiabetics (80%), who had non-Q-wave MI and had percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) performed before discharge from hospital during the period from January 1992 to February 1996. Diabetics were slightly older (64 +/- 10 years vs 61 +/- 12 years, p <0.053), had more prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery (27% vs 12%, p <0.001), and hypertension (77% vs 49%, p <0.001). There was no significant difference in unstable angina, saphenous vein graft PTCA, single versus multiple vessel disease, or history of MI. PTCA success rates for diabetics versus nondiabetics were similar (96% vs 97%, p = NS). In-hospital complications such CABG, recurrent MI, repeat PTCA, stroke, and death were not statistically significant between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, survival in diabetics (92%) was similar to nondiabetics (94%, p = NS), although event-free survival (PTCA, CABG, MI, death) was worse in diabetics (55% vs 67% for nondiabetics, p <0.05). Although diabetic patients with non-Q-wave MI represent a cohort with more risk factors for poor outcome, aggressive in-hospital revascularization with PTCA results in an excellent short-term outcome as well as 1-year survival similar to the nondiabetic patients. However, total events at 1-year follow-up are more common in the diabetic patients, suggesting that more aggressive screening and therapy in follow-up may be warranted, and that a diabetic with non-Q-wave MI will require increased utilization of cardiovascular resources in the first year after the event.     

Randomised trial of coronary intervention with antibody against platelet IIb/IIIa integrin for reduction of clinical restenosis: results at six months. The EPIC Investigators

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty occurs in at least 30% of patients in the first six months and, as yet, there is no known treatment to decrease this event. We tested a monoclonal antibody Fab fragment (c7E3) directed against the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin, the receptor mediating the final common pathway of platelet aggregation, to see whether it reduced the frequency of clinical restenosis. Patients who had unstable angina, recent or evolving myocardial infarction, or high-risk angiographic morphology, were randomised to receive c7E3 bolus and a 12 hour infusion of c7E3 (708 patients), c7E3 bolus and placebo infusion (695 patients), or placebo bolus and placebo infusion (696 patients). With maintenance of the double-blind state, patients were followed-up for at least 6 months to determine the need for repeat angioplasty or surgical coronary revascularisation and the occurrence of ischaemic events. By 30 days, 12.8% of placebo bolus/placebo infusion patients had had a major ischaemic event (death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularisation), compared with 8.3% of c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion patients, yielding a 4.5% difference (35% reduction, p = 0.008). At 6 months, the absolute difference in patients with major ischaemic event or elective revascularisation was 8.1% between placebo bolus/placebo infusion and c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion patients (35.1% vs 27.0%; 23% reduction p = 0.001). The favourable long-term effect was mainly due to less need for bypass surgery or repeat angioplasty in patients with an initial successful procedure, since need for repeat target vessel revascularisation was 26% less for c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion than for placebo treatment (16.5% vs 22.3%; p = 0.007). The c7E3 bolus/placebo infusion group had an intermediate outcome which was not significantly better than that of the placebo bolus/placebo infusion group. These results extend the benefit of c7E3 bolus/c7E3 infusion from reducing abrupt closure and acute-phase adverse outcomes to a diminished need for subsequent coronary revascularisation procedures. Because this therapy carries a risk of bleeding complications and has been studied only in high-risk angioplasty patients, further evaluation is needed before it can be applied to other patient groups.     

The immediate results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty at Hospital San José de Monterrey

We analyzed 69 consecutive PTCA performed upon 64 patients from January 1990 to May 1992. Age was 55 +/- 12 years and 80% were male. Fifty-nine percent were smokers, 32% had hypertension, 16% a remote myocardial infarction, 14% diabetes, 12% previous PTCA, and 6% previous coronary artery bypass surgery. Total cholesterol was 238 +/- 75 mg/dl. Most of the subjects had an acute coronary syndrome, with unstable angina in 31 and a recent myocardial infarction in 23. Angiographically, 52% had single vessel disease, 39% had double vessel and 9% triple vessel disease. LVEF was 55 +/- 11%, LVEDP 17 +/- 10 mm Hg, and 44% had wall motion abnormalities. We dilated 1.4 lesions/patient (1-4), for a total of 100 lesions. Luminal stenosis was reduced from (mean +/- SEM) 88.5 +/- 1.1% to 22.6 +/- 2.2% (p < 0.0001). The procedure was a total clinical success in 85.6% of the patients and a partial clinical success in 4.3%. Complete revascularization was achieved in 62.3% and incomplete but adequate revascularization in 26%. Multiple lesions dilatation was performed in 30% of the patients and multiple vessel angioplasty in 17%. Forty-seven lesions were on the LAD distribution (91.5% angiographic success), 24 on the circumflex (95.8% angiographic success), 26% on RCA (88.4% angiographic success) and 3 in others. There was a 10% failure and 13% complication rates, but more than half of them were successfully managed medically, although 5.7% required urgent CABG. One patient died.     

Peri-operative benefits of beating-heart coronary revascularization in patients with triple vessel disease

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perioperative benefits of the offpump coronary artery surgery to conventional surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) assistance. METHOD: Retrospective study comparing 50 consecutive patients with triple vessel disease (TVD) operated upon with CPB assistance to 50 consecutive patients with TVD operated on beating heart (BH) by the same surgeon between January 1996 and August 1997 at the Montreal Heart Institute. Matching criteria between the 2 groups were: first time operation, normal left ventricular ejection function (LVEF), and coronary TVD. RESULTS: Demographic data and risk factors were comparable in both groups. Unstable angina was the most common surgical indication (CBP: 72%, BH: 62%). The average number of grafts were comparable in both groups (CBP: 3.5 vs 0.6 vs BH: 3.3 +/- 0.4, p = 0.06) as well as the preoperative LVEF (CEC: 60 +/- 1% vs CB: 62 +/- 1.2%, p = 0.38). Arterial lactate count was lower in the BH group during the perioperative period (3.0 +/- 1.0 vs 3.9 +/- 1.7 mM) as well as the maximal CK-MB level (BH: 20 +/- 6.4 vs CBP: 40 +/- 3.5 IU/L, p = 0.003), transfusional needs (CB: 34% vs CEC: 66%, p = 0.003), and postoperative creatinin level (BH: 100 +/- 4.2 vs CBP: 120 +/- 7.1 mM, p = 0.001). Postoperative HB level was also higher in the BH group (110 +/- 14 vs 104 +/- 12, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our data confirm potential benefits from BH surgery on patients affected with triple vessel disease relatively to transfusional needs, and myocardial as well as renal protection.     

Cataract extraction rates in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 through 1994

Management of Q-wave acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to differ between the United States and Canada, with more catheterization and revascularization procedures performed in the United States, but with little or no apparent difference in clinical outcomes. No previous studies have evaluated management differences for the acute coronary syndromes of unstable angina pectoris and non-Q-wave AMI. We therefore compared treatments and outcomes between 14 United States and 4 Canadian tertiary care centers participating in an observational registry of all consecutive admissions for unstable angina or non-Q-wave AMI between 1990 and 1993. A random, stratified sample was selected for detailed assessment and follow-up. There were 1,733 patients enrolled in United States centers and 642 in Canadian ones. In United States centers patients were less likely to receive intravenous nitroglycerin, heparin, beta blockers, calcium antagonists, or > or = 2 anti-ischemic agents. Coronary arteriography during index hospitalization was equally frequent in both countries (63.4% vs 66.9%, p = 0.781), but at 6 weeks and 1 year coronary arteriography was slightly less frequent in the United States patients. Revascularization by coronary angioplasty or bypass surgery was equivalent at 6 weeks and 1 year; however, there were trends toward less angioplasty and more bypass surgery in the United States than in Canada. Patients at United States centers stayed in the hospital fewer days than patients at Canadian centers (mean 8.2 vs 12.1 days, p <0.001). Death or AMI by 6 weeks was not different (4.8% vs 4.4%, p = 0.633), nor was it different at 1 year (10.0% vs 10.2%, p = 0.836). The combined outcome of death, AMI, or recurrent ischemia was more common in United States than in Canadian patients at 6 weeks (18.4% vs 13.9%, p = 0.004). Our findings indicate that United States physicians and hospitals did not consistently utilize more resources and were not more aggressive than their Canadian counterparts when treating acute coronary syndromes during this period.     

Comparison of six-month outcome of coronary artery stenting in patients <65, 65-75, and >75 years of age

We studied 1,238 patients receiving 1,880 coronary stents. In-hospital outcomes were divided by age into <65 years (n = 747, group 1), 65 to 75 years (n = 326, group 2), and >75 years (n = 165, group 3). Procedural success was 97.2%, 95.1%, and 98.8% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = NS). There was 1 death (group 1). Myocardial infarction occurred in 1.2%, 2.8%, and 1.8%, bypass surgery occurred in 0.9%, 1.8%, and 1.2%, and repeat balloon angioplasty in 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0% of patients in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = NS for all comparisons). Vascular complications occurred in 2.8%, 4.9%, and 6.1% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p <0.05). Six-month follow-up of patients was divided by age: <65 years (n = 564, group 1); 65 to 75 years (n = 221, group 2); and >75 years (n = 122, group 3). Event-free survival was 94.5%, 90.5%, and 89.3% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = NS). Death occurred in 0.4%, 0.5%, and 1.6%; myocardial infarction occurred in 1.2%, 2.3%, and 1.6%, and target vessel revascularization in 4.3%, 8.6%, and 7.4% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p = NS for all comparisons). Thus, coronary stenting produced favorable in-hospital and 6-month outcomes in all 3 age groups. Age itself should not preclude patients from undergoing coronary stenting.